The L0tR Motion Picture Trilogy Exhibition 118
cremegg writes " BBC News has a story on the upcoming exhibition at the London Science Museum where fans of the trilogy will be able to explore the high-tech toys used to create the special effects in this epic project."
L0tR? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:L0tR? (Score:1, Informative)
Re:L0tR? (Score:3, Informative)
I hope it will be corrected OR
someone might explain the joke to me why it has to be a number 0 instead of O.
Re:L0tR? (Score:1, Funny)
Re:L0tR? (Score:2, Interesting)
Maybe it's in a different font (Score:1)
Re:L0tR? (Score:3, Informative)
Since.. (Score:1, Funny)
!!!!SPOILERS BELOW!!!!
In Return of the King, after Faramir repents trying to steal the ring from Frodo, he is slain defending Merry and Pippin when an orc hurls a Palantir at his head.
Pippin picks this up, and finds that it is a secret link to Sauron's trusty old Win2k Server in the basement of the Dark Tower, Barad-Dur.
Later, as Gondor is brought to its knees by Mordor's military might, all hope seems lost of the Ring-bearer finding his way to Orodruin without b
Re:L0tR? (Score:3, Funny)
oNE r1NG to 8r1|\|G T|-|3|\/| @LL 4N|) 1n tHe |)4R||\|3$$ 81|\||) tH3|\/|
Lotr or Fun ! (Score:1)
But we need to pee
December==Autumn? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:December==Autumn? (Score:4, Informative)
Re: December==Autumn (Score:1)
I of course would never make this mistake in a TRUE programming launguage:
Yay, BASIC rules!
Nice Troll, it was just a joke, you can go back to your cave now, nice troll, nice trolly, nice
*GULP*
*burp*
Re: December==Autumn (Score:2)
-IF &NUMBER EQ 3 THEN GOTO LABEL140 ;
Any takers?
Re: December==Autumn (Score:1)
Re: December==Autumn (Score:2)
It now has loops, e.g. ;
-SET &INDEX = 0
-REPEAT LOOPFLAG FOR &INDEX FROM 1 TO 5 STEP 1
-TYPE HELLO, INDEX = &INDEX
-LOOPFLAG
And yes it is a pain, but it's a control language called DIALOG MANAGER for the FOCUS 4GL.
Best bit of Focus is that assignments are the other way round so all the logic controlling a variables value may be in the same place, e.g. (excuse /. forma
Still can't beat the books (Score:4, Interesting)
Nevertheless need to give credit to the guys for making a movie out of such a huge book
Re:Still can't beat the books (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Still can't beat the books (Score:3, Insightful)
but they're different mediums.
or you could argue that opera version of some theatretical play is better than the plain theatre version, but there would be very little point in it. as a game the quite new title pirates of the caribbean sucks but the movie on the other hand is ok, and they have just about much in common as a book and a movie would have with the same title and resemblance in characters.
the movies are ok movies, and that is
YES, um and no! (Score:2)
Only IMHO of course, feel free to flame me and mod me down.
Re:L0tR? (Score:1, Insightful)
Lowercase l and the ltter 0 were most adquate and it was up to the user to actually tell the diffrence, just like today when most fonts make #1 and l look so similar, let alone O and 0. Older typewriters you'll note have only 23456789.
In fact, my factory invoice for my 1966 ford f-250 uses lowercase o for it's pricelist of options. Other
LOTR (Score:2, Funny)
LOtR 3 Movie Marathon (Score:1)
Re:LOtR 3 Movie Marathon (Score:3, Insightful)
How many hours sitting in one spot?
Why not do this:
Wait until all extended versions are out and get/rent a big screen tv.
Watch at your own pace with more movie.
Re:LOtR 3 Movie Marathon (Score:5, Informative)
It is a promotional gimmick. They are rereleasing the first two movies on celluloid a couple weeks before the premier of ROTK. The rerelease is the extended version from the DVD's.
However Peter Jackson has been upfront about this thing. He says it is purely promotional and they are only doing like 100 theaters with it.
So you are gonna have to be lucky if you want to see it.
Re:LOtR 3 Movie Marathon (Score:1)
high tech? (Score:1, Interesting)
0? (Score:1, Redundant)
"L0tR" (Score:5, Funny)
Re:"L0tR" (Score:1)
: D (Score:1)
Glad I just moved to London just in time
Re:What high tech toys? (Score:1)
Duracell would disagree with you.
Damnit it's not a trilogy (Score:2, Insightful)
(Sorry. Just one of my pet peeves.)
Re:Damnit it's not a trilogy (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Damnit it's not a trilogy (Score:5, Insightful)
Sadly, they were pretty much irrelevent to the movie makers as well.
Re:Damnit it's not a trilogy (Score:1)
Re:Damnit it's not a trilogy (Score:1)
Frodo lives.
Re:Damnit it's not a trilogy (Score:3, Informative)
It was only after this situation became publicized (and protested) did they back down and start paying Tolkien his due. And even then it was only because a serious boycott was being organized.
Re:Damnit it's not a trilogy (Score:2)
Re:Damnit it's not a trilogy (Score:2)
Or, an even better example: KILL BILL. Quentin Tarantino wrote it, conceived it, and filmed it as one movie, but it ended up being nearly five hours long, so he split it in half. KILL BILL I, and KILL BILL II, but it's all one film. If he had made it six hours long and made it KILL BILL I, II, and III, it wouldn't be a trilogy but a single film in three parts.
STAR WARS = trilogy
BACK TO THE FUTURE = TRILOGY
LotR
Re:Damnit it's not a trilogy (Score:2)
Re:Damnit it's not a trilogy (Score:2)
Re:Damnit it's not a trilogy (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Damnit it's not a trilogy (Score:2)
Re:Damnit it's not a trilogy (Score:2)
Re:Damnit it's not a trilogy (Score:2)
Re:Damnit it's not a trilogy (Score:1)
(One of my pet peeves...)
Re:Damnit it's not a trilogy (Score:2)
Re:Damnit it's not a trilogy (Score:5)
There are three books. What harm is there in referring those three books, as a collective whole, a trilogy of books?
Re:Damnit it's not a trilogy (Score:3, Funny)
Tosser.
Great timing! (Score:4, Interesting)
And here was me thinking this country was boring.
Am I the only person (Score:2)
Re:Am I the only person (Score:2)
Re:Am I the only person (Score:5, Informative)
It focuses on the science and technology that made the films possible - from computer-generated
special effects to animatronics.
Separate areas of the exhibition will explain major technological aspects of the films.
It's not dedicated to the work of fiction itself, but to the science and technology that allowed the creation of said work of fiction.
The purpose to which the technology is put doesn't render it invalid as technology. Frankly, given the predominance of film and computer entertainment in modern day, I think this is very relevant from a cultural perspective.
Re:Am I the only person (Score:1)
Most of the costumes and props were in the movies for seconds or less, or from a distance. The exhibition allowed for extended close-up viewing and appreciation of the craft
Re:Am I the only person (Score:1)
I find nothing strange about an exhibition dedicated to "the cutting-edge technology used to bring the story to life." Wouldn't it be normal for a science and history museum to showcase a piece of technology that has significantly affected culture in the English speaking world?
Not enough movies with expensive CG are based on a true story to justify the obvious response.
Re:Am I the only person (Score:3, Informative)
It's not the first time they've done something like this...they did a James Bond exhibition [sciencemuseum.org.uk] earlier.
Y'see, many of the museums in the UK no longer charge admission for regular exhibits (though many have donation boxes at the entrances)...special exhibits like this are a way to both get more people to visit and to make some extra money.
Yawn :-) (Score:4, Interesting)
It is a good one however - I highly recomend everyone who can see it to go and see it
- traskjd
Re:Yawn :-) (Score:1)
BTW, did anyone else in NZ notice the waterwheel on the Hobbiton mill was spinning the wrong way?
Re:Yawn :-) (Score:1)
Re:Yawn :-) (Score:1)
Re:Yawn :-) (Score:2)
http://www.theonering.net/perl/newsview/2/10441767 29
Old News (Score:1, Redundant)
The exhibition launched prior to the film and was first displayed in Wellington, NZ where it received enormous amounts of international press.
The content and existence of the exhibition are OLD news. Hell, I saw it a year ago.
The real news here I suppose is that now its showing in London.
What's the point? (Score:1, Interesting)
So when "The Phantom Menace" arrives, we get our reward for years of patting George on the head and saying "Good BOY!": brilliant special effects that scream THIS IS A SPECIAL EFFECT, and a script apparently ad
Re:What's the point? (Score:2)
Not only that; Lucas cut out all the interesting parts.
Re:What's the point? (Score:1, Funny)
But I really didn't want to see Jar Jar naked.
Also at the London Science Museum... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Also at the London Science Museum... (Score:2, Interesting)
I was there last Wednesday - the Differential Engine II is built according to the specs Babbage laid out but they were unable to build it in his time - the Science Museum commisioned it I believe.
Apart from the Babbage stuff, the computer department wasn't too impressive IMHO. I did like the real WW2 V2 rocket they have on display - I didn't realize it was so huge till I saw it! And the actual Apollo 8 capsule that went around the moon (test-driving for the Apollo 11) was also neat.
Their display of sevent
Re:Also at the London Science Museum... (Score:2)
Seen it - It's great (Score:3, Informative)
I highly recommend attending if it you get the chance.
Jedidiah
Saw this in New Zealand (Score:1)
However, the only "high tech toy" that you can explore of any memorability was the altered perspective wagon chair that lets you see yourself twice the size of the friend sitting next to you.
This always bothers me... (Score:1)
It isn't upcoming... (Score:1)
Re:It isn't upcoming... (Score:1)
Been there, done that... a year ago! (Score:3, Interesting)
Give yourself at *least* 2 hours to really appreciate the detail in all the costumes, etc. It's amazing the work Weta has put into it.
mindslip
Not really that interesting (Score:1)
From the People Who Brought you 'l0pht'... (Score:1)
Geekiness (Score:1, Funny)
I'm sick of hearing about it. This from a man who has watched & followed SW religiously since 1977; was a devoted fan of ST until B5 came along, and who can't wait for the next Alan Moore comic book.
Jeez, guys. R
Re:Sad news ... Stephen King dead at 55 (Score:2)