Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
The Matrix Media Movies

The Matrix Trailers, Reloaded and Re-Encoded 266

Posted by Hemos from the bumping-up-the-bit-count dept.
dark_lotus writes "The fine folks at The Matrix website, have re-encoded all 9 trailers from the original Matrix, bumped up the resolution and uploaded them for us to enjoy, including a never before released trailer. Also included, all the missing Reloaded and Revolutions Trailers and TV Spots - all now available to download."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

The Matrix Trailers, Reloaded and Re-Encoded More

The Matrix Trailers, Reloaded and Re-Encoded

Comments Filter:

  • That's nothing (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 22, 2003 @09:30AM (#7785764)
    I did that last night to the actual movies, which are now availiable (sic) to download from a P2P client near you.

    *Spoiler warning*
    The second and third movies are shit.

    • Re:That's nothing (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Dogtanian ( 588974 ) on Monday December 22, 2003 @09:48AM (#7785930) Homepage
      I did that last night to the actual movies, which are now availiable (sic) to download from a P2P client near you.

      *Spoiler warning*
      The second and third movies are shit.

      Moderated -1, Troll?! Who was the humorless geek who moderated this down? It's funny, dammit... even the second bit.

      More importantly, it seems every post in this thread that dares criticise the Matrix sequels is getting marked down, troll or not.

      The third Matrix movie sucked (not the second IMHO)- you're entitled to disagree, but it's what a lot of people honestly think, like it or not.
      • When I first saw it, I thought the second one was pretty good. Part of this was the distinct feeling that we were building up to the answers to some BIG issues in the third movie. When the 3rd kinda wussed out, I think it tainted the second movie for a lot of fans.

      • Re:That's nothing (Score:3, Interesting)

        by Slarty ( 11126 )
        That's kinda funny, I thought had become pretty accepted now that the original rocked and the sequels sucked. Although you're right, Revolutions was (aside from a few cool sequences) much more of a let-down than Reloaded was. And Reloaded was... well, it wasn't a bad movie, but it was so vastly far outside the scope of the original movie that I think people were a bit shocked. It's kind of like comparing LOTR to The Hobbit... same world, waaaaaaay larger scope. Although LOTR worked, Revolutions mostly didn'

    • Re:That's nothing (Score:5, Insightful)

      by nehril ( 115874 ) on Monday December 22, 2003 @10:53AM (#7786386)
      2 and 3 were actually good stories told poorly. They were pretty deep and all the nonsense dialog actually DOES make sense once you see all three and spend some time thinking about it.

      there are some quite brilliant concepts in there that are unfortunately told by the worst possible storytelling (in stark contrast to the first, where the storytelling was so excellent that everything is understood right away).

      you have to really think about what is happening, have a little bit of grounding in physics/philosophy, AND keep in mind that there are no truly wasted scenes (yes, the train station scene was NOT wasted. think about what you learned in it.)
      • (yes, the train station scene was NOT wasted. think about what you learned in it.)

        I learned that boredom is a palpable force, and that it delights in squatting on my chest, slapping me and screaming "Gimme your lunch money!" and "Who's my bitch? WHO'S MY BITCH?"

      • No, sorry, there may be small bits of philosophy in The Matrix which are interesting, but none of it is new, and most of it is just boring rehash thrown together without a lot of thought.

        All of that silly stuff about what's real and what's not has been done better, both in fiction and nonfiction, for a long time. The Matrix just put a lot of guns and special effects around it so that people who don't normally read these kinds of things get sucked in, and the leave having discovered an entire new world. Unf

        • Re:That's nothing (Score:4, Interesting)

          by fbg111 ( 529550 ) on Monday December 22, 2003 @07:13PM (#7790793)
          people who don't normally read these kinds of things get sucked in, and the leave having discovered an entire new world. Unfortunately, they think that because the world is new to them, it must be new to everybody.

          If it achieved exactly that and nothing more, then it accomplished a worthy mission. Do you have any idea how many Americans (at least) there are that read and have an understanding of philosophy, even as presented in the Matrix? That's right, about a relative handful. If this movie did anything to improve that number, then I say bravo!

          On a side note, it seems a lot of people criticize these movies for being redundant in their investigation of our perception of reality. Yes, perhaps it has been done before, but I think the Wachowski's deserve credit for their chosen method of doing so. The concept of the Matrix turned out to be a perfect way of showing (not telling, as my high-school lit teacher admonished us) that our "interface" with reality consists of a nervous system based on electrical impulses, and can conceivably be manipulated, or hacked if you will.

          Further, what was more interesting to me was the conflict of determinism vs. choice, or materialism vs. idealism. That also happened to be the underlying conflict of the Cold War, for anyone who knows anything about Marxism, Soviet Communism, and the Enlightenment ideals of America and the West. I found it most enjoyable to see that conflict played out in the setting of the Matrix: man vs. machine; absolute determinism vs. absolute free will. Since Reloaded and Revolutions dealt more with that conflict, while The Matrix dealt mostly with the nature of reality, I enjoyed the second two movies just as much, and more in Reloaded's case, than the first.
    • Couldn't agree more. Seeing the trailer, with bits from all 3 movies, reminded me how good the first was and how crappy the second two were. True, the first was also new & exciting, but Die Hard 2 was a better sequel than Reloaded. Only T3 kept Revolutions from being the biggest letdown of the year.
    • Too bad they didnt "upgrade" the trailers to using a good program, like WMP or DivX. If something requires me to install an abomination of an OS-killer like QuickTime, I'd rather just skip it.

  • Little late... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by (trb001) ( 224998 ) on Monday December 22, 2003 @09:31AM (#7785768) Homepage
    Doesn't this lose a little meaning when not only have the movies come out, but 2/3 of them are on DVD?

    --trb

  • Won't last for long (Score:3, Funny)

    by dicepackage ( 526497 ) <dicepackage@gmai[ ]om ['l.c' in gap]> on Monday December 22, 2003 @09:31AM (#7785775) Homepage
    This site is about to be brought to its knees

  • Whoever did it (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Lord_Dweomer ( 648696 ) on Monday December 22, 2003 @09:32AM (#7785779) Homepage
    Whoever hit them with the clue-bat, THANK YOU! Even though they're not making money (directly) off the release of these high quality trailers, it is at least a generous offer to fans/collectors. I can't count how many companies have stuff like this sitting around and decide "oh hey, if we put it on a a Super Extended Platinum Edition dvd, they'll buy the whole thing over again!"

    Thank you for actually doing something nice for fans for once Hollywood.

    • Re:Whoever did it (Score:4, Insightful)

      by TopShelf ( 92521 ) on Monday December 22, 2003 @09:38AM (#7785841) Homepage Journal
      That's an excellent point - at first, I didn't see this as a big deal, but you're right that this sort of material usually ends up as DVD filler anyway. You're starting to see studios take a more enlightened attitude towards using the internet as a medium for engaging fans (i.e. the LotR films' cooperation with fan sites), which is a very good thing...

    • Are you kidding? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by *weasel ( 174362 ) on Monday December 22, 2003 @09:41AM (#7785861)
      they're in CYA mode trying to 'reload' any interest in their franchise while they try to cobble together the Revolutions dvd.

      the interest in their films fell way off, and so they're trying to generate some positive press and keep the core fanbase interested.

      This is anything but selfless. They still have a dvd to sell that, judging by the attendance, not so many people care to buy at the moment.
      • "they're in CYA mode trying to 'reload' any interest in their franchise while they try to cobble together the Revolutions dvd. the interest in their films fell way off, and so they're trying to generate some positive press and keep the core fanbase interested. This is anything but selfless. They still have a dvd to sell that, judging by the attendance, not so many people care to buy at the moment."

        This is a very valid point, but realize that this kind of stuff would normally end up as Extras on the upcomin

  • Why? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 22, 2003 @09:32AM (#7785782)
    Why would you download all of the trailers, when you can simply purchase the movies, barring the latest? Is this a recent fad, hoarding "previews"?

    • Re:Why? (Score:3, Insightful)

      by Chibi ( 232518 )

      Why would you download all of the trailers, when you can simply purchase the movies, barring the latest? Is this a recent fad, hoarding "previews"?

      Well, I keep a few trailers on my computer at work. Just to play when I'm bored or going out of my mind because of work (did I just repeat myself there? ;).

      My work computer doesn't have a DVD-ROM drive, and I don't have a portable player. Not to mention, I'd rather not carry my DVDs all over the place, lest they get damaged or stolen.

      Yeah, it's not a h

  • Hmmmm.... Nice. (Score:2, Informative)

    by ejito ( 700826 )
    Wow, that never released trailer is quite stylish. Wonder why it wasn't released? Well, I guess it does seem to give away a lot of the action. The final trailers for Revolutions pretty much gave away everything, though. So, meh.

  • What's the point ? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 22, 2003 @09:36AM (#7785811)
    Have I missed something ?

    I mean, what's the bloody point of creating a new trailer for a film that's long been released ?

    Surely the point of a trailer is to advertise the film ?

    What a complete waste of time. Of course, there will still be some sad geeks that just have to download it and go 'oooo' and 'wow !!', and 'look at that !' for reasons best known to them and their damp tissues.

  • Theatrical Trailer/Broken Link (Score:5, Informative)

    by Veovis ( 612685 ) * <cyrellia@gmail.com> on Monday December 22, 2003 @09:36AM (#7785815) Homepage
    The "Theatrical Trailer" download links to the Superbowl trailer, to get the CORRECT file for Theatrical Trailer the link is

    http://progressive.warnerbros.com/thematrix/us/med /matrix_tr_theatrical_640_dl.zip [warnerbros.com]

  • Sure, they make pretty good trailers (Score:5, Funny)

    by Dr. Spork ( 142693 ) on Monday December 22, 2003 @09:37AM (#7785830)
    Now if only those people would learn how to make a good movie!

  • unreleased trailer (Score:5, Funny)

    by Lord_Dweomer ( 648696 ) on Monday December 22, 2003 @09:38AM (#7785833) Homepage
    I hear in the unreleased trailer, Triniti's nipple pops out while she's in bullet time!

    ............crap....why did my download just die?

  • Just makes me think (Score:4, Interesting)

    by OgreChow ( 206018 ) on Monday December 22, 2003 @09:38AM (#7785839)
    After watching the trailers for the original, having not seen the first movie for a couple of years now, it set me to thinking. Imagine how much cooler the final two movies would have been if Neo had started the revolution of the Matrix from the inside, instead of from the outside.

    Converting people on the inside, gaining an army of followers battling the system.

    • Re:Just makes me think (Score:5, Insightful)

      by cgenman ( 325138 ) on Monday December 22, 2003 @10:05AM (#7786049) Homepage
      Technically, Neo didn't start the revolution from the outside... He didn't start any revolution. To most people in the film, he was just a guy with nifty powers, who didn't show up for the final act. Seeing as how he died before he could tell anyone what he was doing, they probably thought he was full of hot air. Maybe Morpheous' prophecy of the joining of humans and machines will convince people that Neo is responsible. Maybe not.

      Personally, I wanted to watch the machines destroy the giant matrix server in order to get rid of Neo, with Neo flipping through subsystems trying to avoid the path of destruction. Of course, I also wanted the producers to ignore the whole flying at the end of the first movie thing, claiming metaphoric license, and I wanted the second movie to, you know, advance the plot.

      I guess like the unofficial Star Wars prequels, a fan's work is never done.

    • Doesn't work (Score:5, Interesting)

      by TrekkieGod ( 627867 ) on Monday December 22, 2003 @10:12AM (#7786097) Homepage Journal
      You can't "convert" people on the inside. Until they are freed, agents are able to take over their body. It's why, in the first movie, Switch holds a gun to Neo during the entire time they're driving to see Morpheus. It's the reason for the "lady in red" training. It's the reason why, when Neo was running from Smith at the end of the first movie, and he ran into this really crowded place, he uttered "shit".

      Now, sure...you can free a whole bunch of people (which Neo did...Morpheus mentions in reloaded more people had been freed in the past 6 months then had been in the past 6 years). Then you could send them all into the matrix to fight...what? The rest of the humans still plugged in? The very people you're trying to save? Heck, you'd need way too many hovercrafts to get these people up to broadcast depth, all to do something Neo can do on his own. Inside the matrix, he rules. If he can't handle something, no amount of "normal" people can. The only thing Neo was incapable of handling on a pure fight was Smith, and Smith has shown his ability to copy himself even into people that have been freed from the matrix (ie, Bane).

      But yeah...I know what you mean. It would be much cooler to have a whole bunch of really good fight scenes inside the matrix than the whole boring Zion fight. Then again, I know a whole bunch of other people who think the exact opposite, were really tired of the wire-fu, and really liked the Zion battle.

      I could live either way. All I needed was an explanation of what the heck happened. In an all-fantasy story like Lord of the Rings, anything goes...it's fantasy. With the matrix, the first matrix set the boundaries--the reason Neo can do all those things is because he's inside a computer program, and he can change the program somehow. Then, with Revolutions they pulled the whole "the power of the one extends beyond this world" thing. Why? The power of the one was changing the code of the matrix, what other power does he have that allows him to do things outside the matrix? Really, I wouldn't care how they approached the revolution, I just wanted a coherent storyline.

      • The power of the one was changing the code of the matrix, what other power does he have that allows him to do things outside the matrix?

        You may have noticed that the special powers which Neo has outside the Matrix only work on things from the machine world (ability to stop sentinels, ability to 'see' machines/programs (e.g. Smith) while blind). The explanation must be that Neo has some kind of 'wireless connection' to the Matrix, which allows him to communicate with the Matrix without being plugged in. N

    • Re:Just makes me think (Score:5, Interesting)

      by the Man in Black ( 102634 ) <jasonrashaad@@@gmail...com> on Monday December 22, 2003 @10:20AM (#7786151) Homepage
      had started the revolution of the Matrix from the inside, instead of from the outside.

      Converting people on the inside, gaining an army of followers battling the system.

      Which is exactly what Smith did. Makes you think about the convo between Neo and the Oracle:

      Neo: What is he?
      Oracle: He's you.

      I think once all three are out, and can be watched back to back, there will be a better appreciation for the series. I recently re-watched Revolutions (in IMAX! Woo hoo!) and picked up on a lot of things that I missed the first time. Same goes with repeat viewings of Reloaded.

      I think people just wanted a slam-bang action movie with guns and martial arts and cool effects (like the first). Though, knowing the /. crowd, had it been that all we'd be talking about is how 'trite' it was and how they 'basically remade the first movie' and blah blah blah.
      • I think people just wanted a slam-bang action movie with guns and martial arts and cool effects (like the first)

        Actually, this is exactly what I didn't think the first movie was (there was a great deal of philosophical questions raised), and also the reason why I rated it 9 of 10 at IMDb. I found it to be a spectacular combination of ground breaking special effects nicely combined with an unusally "deep" movie. Matrix Revolutions on the other hand... Main characters gone in the major part of the movie, mo

      • That's not what we're looking for. (Score:5, Insightful)

        by biendamon ( 723952 ) on Monday December 22, 2003 @11:55AM (#7786875)
        We're looking for a cohesive plot, believable characters, and (on the geeky side) well-integrated special effects that don't distract us from the story, not an excuse for the movie-makers to bludgeon us over the heads with their cleverness.

        I see in the Reloaded and Revolutions the same problems I see in Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones: A big idea, executed poorly.

        In the first Matrix, parallels with mythical/historical figures were obvious. Neo was a Christ-like figure, Morpheus a prophet, and Cypher a Judas. But Neo was also a conflicted hacker, Morpheus had a personality containing something besides bombast, and Cypher was an interesting villain in his own right. In other words, the characters were certainly analogues for other characters, but they were also themselves. They had senses of humour, they could love and hate, they had weaknesses and strengths, and were, for lack of a better word, human.

        Then came Reloaded, and all of that was lost. The parallels between the characters and figures went from subtle to painfully transparent, and the characters stopped being themselves. They were cardboard representations of the archetypes they were meant to represent.

        What made the first Matrix so compelling was the human element, which was lost in the sequels. Instead, we got Link and his wife as sort of an afterthought, and they are utterly forgettable. We have the guy I can only think of as "Spoon-boy," whose dialogue was so painful to watch I almost asked for my money back. We have Morpheus going from desperate searcher to religious zealot, while the commander who doesn't believe him (the only person in Zion with an ounce of common sense) portrayed as a one-dimensional obstacle to truth and light and all that crap.

        These movies were bad. I mean BAD. But the worst thing about them was that the story concept was still good.

        My suspicion is that the Wachowski brothers suffer from the same problem George Lucas does now. No one will tell them "uhh, guys, this dialogue sucks!" Or better yet "why don't you guys stick to directing and coming up with plotline, and let other people do the writing." Or even "for the love of god, guys, let an editor have a crack at this tripe!"
    • You pretty much described the sequels we were all expecting, particularly after the phone conversation at the end of the first film.

      We were all looking forward to an incredible sequel involving Neo freeing the people Matrix world as the Agents and whatever else tried desperately to stop him, and then the entire freed world tackling the machines in the third film and destroying their captors in ultimate victory. Neo was supposed to be the superhero to end all superheroes.

      However, the sequels decided to o

  • Torrents? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Seek_1 ( 639070 ) on Monday December 22, 2003 @09:42AM (#7785874)
    If anyone is able to grab them and start a Torrent, I'd be more than happy to join up..

  • Just Watch the Trailers (Score:5, Funny)

    by superdan2k ( 135614 ) on Monday December 22, 2003 @09:46AM (#7785914) Homepage Journal
    You can get the entire plot of the movie with all the deep thoughts and ambiguity by watching the short trailers as opposed to sitting through the whole movie where everything gets ruined by the script.

    And suckage is easier to deal with in small doses.

  • Peter Jackson - learn from this (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Zog The Undeniable ( 632031 ) on Monday December 22, 2003 @09:52AM (#7785962)
    Come on, put the "extended" stuff from RoTK up for download when the cinematic DVD comes out. You can include a special password with the cinematic DVD if you like.

    People will still buy your extended DVD if they want it all on one disc (not forgetting the high quality plastic Denethor figurine in the Collectors' Edition), but they won't be forced to pay $$$ for something they only want to see half an hour of.

  • Bandwidth (Score:4, Funny)

    by NiTr|c ( 130325 ) <hackop@@@inumbrate...net> on Monday December 22, 2003 @10:01AM (#7786024) Homepage
    Is everyone still asleep? For some reason I'm actually able to see the page and download the trailer at higher than 500 bytes per second. Something is wrong, very very wrong.
  • It Bloooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwsssss

    I swear, the slamming he gave it the day after Revolutions came out has to be one of the funniest daily shows lines this year. He kept harping on it for the rest of that week. Everytime me or my wife hear someone mention the matrix, we both end up looking at each other and saying "It Bloooooooowwws" for giggles.

    -chris

  • uh.... (Score:2, Funny)

    by caomania ( 579403 )
    slow news day

  • Of Serials: Matrix, ROTK, and Harry Potter (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Effugas ( 2378 ) on Monday December 22, 2003 @10:27AM (#7786202) Homepage
    So it's kind of interesting.

    As of late, there's been a resurgence in so-called "franchise" movies, where the funding for and expectation of a sequel is a foregone conclusion during the production process. Recently, we've seen three variants of this:

    A) Lord Of The Rings, which filmed all three episodes in one monster shoot, then spent a year between each tweaking for maximum quality.

    B) The Matrix Trilogy, which filmed the second and third episode in a less-monstrous shoot, and originally planned to unveil the conclusion a mere three months after the return. Tweaking was not originally planned for.

    C) Harry Potter, which does not appear to begin production of the next chapter until the previous movie has finished its theatrical run.

    Given these three case studies, it's worth noting that two of them (LOTR and HP) have their plotlines and characters fully fleshed out from day one, far in advance of movie production. Meanwhile, The Matrix sequels were written in response to the success of the original, meaning the third one got a screenplay before the second saw any public scrutiny.

    I think this was the problem.

    Unlike LOTR and HP, which had a healthy community of readers who could be tapped to determine which parts were most interesting and which parts could be sacrificed to the cutting room floor, the Wachowski's flew blind when concluding their series. They tried to show everything they could do, rather than explore the dimensions people were most interested in. When they realized their conclusion answered none of the new questions people couldn't help but ask -- they had no opportunity to recover their loss, save to push a worldwide release.

    It's sad, too. Matrix Revolutions should have been a revolution inside the Matrix; the humans taking over their own virtual world, perhaps saving their own, perhaps abandoning it to the machines. Fundamentally, it should have been about the many within, not the grungy escapees. And so many interesting opportunities were abandoned...the spoon from the Matrix showing up in Zion, for instance. E

    I don't know what happened. But I do know -- the serial format has brought some astonishing successes, and alot of money -- but when it fails, it seems to fail big.

    Yours Truly,

    Dan Kaminsky
    DoxPara Research
    http://www.doxpara.com

    • Re:Of Serials: Matrix, ROTK, and Harry Potter (Score:4, Informative)

      by Zog The Undeniable ( 632031 ) on Monday December 22, 2003 @10:39AM (#7786283)
      The HP schedule is in trouble...film 3 isn't going to be out until June 2004 (the first two were released in Nov 2001 and Nov 2002) and the cast are ageing at a speed only schoolkids can. It's unlikely that film 7, if it's ever made, will be able to use the same Harry, Hermione and Ron unless they're *very* baby-faced twentysomethings.

      Besides, can you think of *any* film franchise that has gone beyond 3 without sucking a very large one? Please, no-one say Police Academy.

    • Meanwhile, The Matrix sequels were written in response to the success of the original, meaning the third one got a screenplay before the second saw any public scrutiny.

      Joel Silver has spoken before about how the Wachowskis came to him with a sci-fi trilogy even around 1994. The idea was an episodic storyline like a comic book.

      They made Bound to prove that they could direct, then started work on the first Matrix movie.
  • It was hyped before the release and after the first day it seemed like they had spent their marketting budget.

    I think I saw one or two ads after the fact but it was almost like it came in with a gusto and left a week later in a wimper.
  • Not saying "bah" out of any sort of disbelief. Quite the opposite. Isn't "baaah" the sound sheep make?
    (note: *I* am making the sheep noises, therefore *I* must be the sheep.)

  • Trailers done by slashdotters? (Score:4, Funny)

    by WalterSobchak ( 193686 ) on Monday December 22, 2003 @11:45AM (#7786770) Homepage Journal
    Did anyone else think, in the "missing trailer", when they showed the text 'In 1999 The Matrix Has You'

    "Shouldn't that be 'In Soviet Russia'?"

    Could not resist, sorry.

    Alex
  • Haven't most of us given up on the Matrix by now? What did it for me was the part with the squid-firing mechs and "we go over them". So the machines can build levitating/hovering squid machines but they can't figure out how to put a solar panel on a helium balloon? Bah!
    • If you didn't notice, the hovercraft lost all powered systems when it went through the electrical storms. What good would it serve the machines to build a helium balloon if all the equipment they floated through the clouds was destroyed?
    • Hey, some of us never give up on "Duck Soup" or "Animal Crackers".
  • You take the blue pill, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill, you stay in wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes.

  • i'm transfixed
    by the politics
    of the matrix
    celluoid intermix.
    Pretentious comics
    too many tricks
    need a dose
    truth be told
    a reality hose
    a sanity fix.
    too much crap.
    directors snapped.
    feedback zapped.
    loop got cracked.

    1 was provoking
    my brain was smoking
    existance is a dream
    the machine
    is stroking.

    2 much kung foo
    used as the glue
    plot disappeared
    keanu shoulda too.

    3 i didn't see
    previews are free
    it's all there
    story scree.

  • Matrix Revolutions Plot Summary (Score:5, Funny)

    by mac os ken ( 732050 ) on Monday December 22, 2003 @02:12PM (#7788099) Homepage Journal
    Morpheus: **its going to hit the fan. The fan an obvious metaphor for Zion.

    Neo: Woah.

    Morpheus: But we've known that since the first movie.

    ...a few minutes later...

    Zion is being attacked. The next hour and a half consists of:
    Shooting robots.
    Shooting robots.
    Shooting robots.
    Shooting robots.
    Shooting robots.
    Shooting the wall.
    Shooting robots.
    Shooting robots.
    "Accidental Friendly Fire." (The guy owed me a few bucks.)
    Shooting robots.
    Shooting bigger robots.

    Neo: I know how to save Zion. I have to login to the kernal and see if he'll grant me root/admin privileges.

    LOGIN: Neo
    PASSWORD: trinitywaseasy

    (Neo clicks Apple > Restart.)
    The End!
    Honestly I don't care about "High Resolution" trailers and other propoganda if the actual content is crap.

  • On the ninth day of Christmas, Slashdot gave to me: 9 Matrix Trailers

    3 days left... :)

  • This is what Hollywood is good at... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by zosa ( 261289 ) on Monday December 22, 2003 @02:49PM (#7788423)
    ...creating trailers. They have become masters of great-looking, action-packed 30 to 60-second spots for movies that are generally pretty poor.
  • They re-released TRAILERS, since they were better than the ACTUAL MOVIES anyway....

    UGH

    Hay W Brothers! How about I give you the finger and you give me my wasted time and money back?

Slashdot Top Deals

Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (10) Sorry, but that's too useful.

Close