Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Sci-Fi Books Media

Arthur C. Clarke Talks With The Onion 375

sootman writes "The Onion has an interview with Arthur C. Clarke in this week's issue. My favorite line: 'The asteroid [named after me] is number four thousand and something, and the International Astronomical Federation, which deals with these sorts of things and numbered it, apologized to me because number 2001 wasn't available, having been given to somebody named "A. Einstein."'" Reader ronys point out that Despite the source, the interview is not a spoof or satire."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Arthur C. Clarke Talks With The Onion

Comments Filter:
  • Author's blog (Score:5, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 18, 2004 @11:44AM (#8315999)
    The interviewer's blog can be found here [livejournal.com], for what it's worth.
    • by jsonic ( 458317 ) on Wednesday February 18, 2004 @12:15PM (#8316320)
      O: Another favorite quote you tend to bring up in interviews is, "If there are any gods whose chief concern is man, they can't be very important gods." Can you expound on that?

      ACC: [Laughs.] Well, I was rather a cynic once. But now I've combined all my beliefs into this phrase I've been circulating: "Religion is the most malevolent of all mind viruses." It's adapted from a phrase by the British writer and scientist Richard Dawkins, who said that religion was a mind virus, an idea that infected the mind. He said that not all mind-viruses are malignant; some may even be beneficial. But many are harmful--racist theories, for instance.

      • by indianajones428 ( 644219 ) on Wednesday February 18, 2004 @01:11PM (#8316996)
        How about this one?

        "I'm very fond of the quote--I don't know who said it first--'The best proof that there's intelligent life in the universe is that it hasn't come here.'"

        Arthur C. Cleark quoting Bill Watterson [ucomics.com]....

        Very cool.

  • 2001: A Space Odyssey came out in 1968 if memory serves, isn't Clarke getting a bit old?

    Next they'll be conducting an interview with Philip K. Dick by Ouija Board. Not that this wouldn't be any weirder than The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch or Radio Free Ablemuth...
  • Believe it or not (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Joe U ( 443617 ) on Wednesday February 18, 2004 @11:45AM (#8316011) Homepage Journal
    The Onion does have real interviews and a pretty good AV section.

    The print edition is like a reverse newspaper, with the comic section everywhere and a small non-comic center pull-out.
    • Re:Believe it or not (Score:5, Informative)

      by illuminatedwax ( 537131 ) <stdrange@alumni. ... u ['go.' in gap]> on Wednesday February 18, 2004 @11:50AM (#8316068) Journal
      Actually, it's more like a comic beginning section, followed by a slightly larger Arts section with interviews, reviews of movies, books, and music, as well as picks of upcoming shows in the area (depending on where you get it). The AV section is usually bigger than the joke section, and is usually pretty excellent.

      --Stephen
    • DK2/The Dark Knight Strikes Again was under rated, Miller rules!

      God damn I'm a nerd.

      • DK2/The Dark Knight Strikes Again was under rated, Miller rules!

        Miller does rule but boy did Dark Knight Strikes Again suck. In my humble opinion, of course. Most of it was a poor rehash of Dark Knight Returns and it contained only a few inspired ideas like using the Flash to generate electricity.

    • The Onion AV section holds plenty of weight, even after the joke articles get old.

      I find their music and film criticism to be especially astute; I'm sure there are examples of bad calls but on the whole I find their criticism insightful.

      And their interviews are top-notch.

      The biggest problem with the AV club is the annoying ad click-through. But the content is good enough for me to look past.
    • Yeah, and the interviews are usually excellent. Even if they're interviewing someone I have little interest in (like Amy Sedaris or The RZA), I'll still read it, because I know it'll be interesting. The A.V. Club's reviews are usually pretty good too, though their "Films That Time Forgot" sometimes get thematic from week to week.
  • by sbennett ( 448295 ) <spb.gentoo@org> on Wednesday February 18, 2004 @11:49AM (#8316051)
    he first created the popular axiom "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magick."

    Which of course leads to the corollary: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    • he first created the popular axiom "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magick."

      Which of course leads to the corollary: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."


      All bow before TIVO!

    • by AllUsernamesAreGone ( 688381 ) on Wednesday February 18, 2004 @12:10PM (#8316267)
      Or even the alternative observation from James Klass: "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo."
    • by blorg ( 726186 ) on Wednesday February 18, 2004 @12:13PM (#8316294)
      Black magic? Its behaviour is certainly often incomprehensible.
    • by tramm ( 16077 ) <hudson@swcp.com> on Wednesday February 18, 2004 @12:22PM (#8316373) Homepage
      he first created the popular axiom "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magick." Which of course leads to the corollary: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
      To be pedantic, that is the contrapositive of Clark's Law. The contrapositive is a rule of inference that allows you to reverse the consequent and antecedent: if P implies Q, then not Q implies not P.
      • by Noren ( 605012 ) on Wednesday February 18, 2004 @01:27PM (#8317160)
        To be much more pedantic, that is the contrapositive of Clarke's Third Law(1973), [faqs.org] the popular axiom to which the grandparent referred.

        Clarke's Law(1962), which was later renamed Clarke's First Law, reads:

        When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right.

        When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.
        It is perhaps relevant given the misattribution to Asimov earlier and the corollary reference of the grandparent to also mention Asimov' Corollary to Clarke's First Law (1978):
        When, however, the lay public rallies round an idea that is denounced by distinguished but elderly scientists and supports that idea with great fervor and emotion --

        the distinguished but elderly scientists are then, after all, probably right.
      • To be pedantic, that is the contrapositive of Clark's Law. The contrapositive is a rule of inference that allows you to reverse the consequent and antecedent: if P implies Q, then not Q implies not P.

        To be pedantic myself, what was wrong with what the OP said? A corollary is a minor claim which is logically dependent on a previously-established claim.

        What particular rule of interference was used to deduce the corollary from the original statement isn't really important. There's nothing wrong with calli
  • by Anonymous Coward
    Too bad for us.
  • by Channard ( 693317 ) on Wednesday February 18, 2004 @12:04PM (#8316215) Journal
    I pity the fool who doesn't name an asteroid after one of The Onion's previous interviewees, Mr T.
  • by darnok ( 650458 ) on Wednesday February 18, 2004 @12:07PM (#8316247)
    you've written two autobiographies
  • I did kind of like that one, but I thought a much more interesting Clarke book, concerning the long future, was "The City and the Stars". Anybody else have favorites?
  • Was I the only one who noticed this little quote?

    Incidentally, have you heard about the discovery of the largest living creature on Earth? Would you believe it's two or three miles across, and probably several thousand years old, and still growing? It's this fungus that's eating Oregon. It's a single creature. I'm not quite sure how that's determined.

    Does anyone know WTF he is talking about here? Before I came back to China last year I didn't seem to remember my fellow Oregonians running away in fear f
  • vegetaiton statement (Score:4, Informative)

    by VAXcat ( 674775 ) on Wednesday February 18, 2004 @12:12PM (#8316287)
    http://www.chez.com/lesovnis/htm/marsveg01.htm
  • Fungus Eating Oregon (Score:5, Interesting)

    by airConditionedGypsy ( 703864 ) on Wednesday February 18, 2004 @12:14PM (#8316315)
    In the article, Clarke mentions the "largest living creature" to be a fungus two or three miles across "eating Oregon."

    His word choice leads one to envision doom and death, and I was sufficiently motiviated to search for more info on this beastie.

    http://www.harpers.org/Oregon.html

    http://www.newhouse.com/archive/story1b080700.html

    Google search gets you more.

    on another topic: Anyone amazed at how many quotes this guy has stored up in his head?

  • 20{01,10} (Score:5, Funny)

    by pergamon ( 4359 ) on Wednesday February 18, 2004 @12:16PM (#8316332) Homepage
    O: Have you seen the movie recently at all?


    ACC: No. I want to look at it again, and also 2010, which I did with [director] Peter Hyams, and which was also quite good. I can't remember when I did last see it.


    What's his address? I'll mail him the damn DVDs.
  • by FlashBIOS ( 665492 ) on Wednesday February 18, 2004 @12:23PM (#8316391)
    Here is a link to the vegitation [daviddarling.info] photos that he seems to be talking about. It also includes a breif description of what it might be

    My questions is, why hasn't this been bigger news? Did it come out and I just missed it?

  • by gosand ( 234100 ) on Wednesday February 18, 2004 @12:27PM (#8316421)
    I highly recommend his book "Greetings, Carbon Based Bipeds", which is a collection of his various writings. Very entertaining reading, especially when you consider the timeframe when some of them were written. (1934-1998) You can pick it up for next to nothing [bestwebbuys.com].
  • by FilmJr ( 754051 ) on Wednesday February 18, 2004 @12:35PM (#8316501)
    This may well have already been mentioned but... The Onion A.V. Club (the serious side of the operation) published a collection of interviews similar to the Arthur Clarke one. Book is called THE TENACITY OF A COCKROACH and includes conversations with other pop culture movers & shakers like Harlan Ellison, Chuck Jones, and George Romero. Jr.
  • by stuffduff ( 681819 ) on Wednesday February 18, 2004 @12:57PM (#8316819) Journal

    CNN is one of the participants in the war. I have a fantasy where Ted Turner is elected president but refuses because he doesn't want to give up power.

    If an elderly but distinguished scientist says that something is possible he is almost certainly right, but if he says that it is impossible he is very probably wrong.

    It has yet to be proven that intelligence has any survival value.

    Politicians should read science fiction, not westerns and detective stories.

    The best measure of a man's honesty isn't his income tax return. It's the zero adjust on his bathroom scale.

    There is hopeful symbolism in the fact that flags do not wave in a vacuum.

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

    The only way to discover the limits of the possible is to go beyond them into the impossible.

    • by cybergrue ( 696844 ) on Wednesday February 18, 2004 @02:00PM (#8317519)
      Clark has his own set of laws, most of which you have mentioned. He reportably created the first three because Isaac Asimov had three, however over time, a 4th has been added. ACC Laws [lsi.usp.br]
      1) "When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong."
      2) "The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible."
      3) "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
      69th) "Reading computer manuals without the hardware is as frustrating as reading sex manuals without the software."
  • by liftwatch ( 731474 ) * on Wednesday February 18, 2004 @01:11PM (#8316997) Homepage

    I was particularly interested in the last couple of paragraphs, regarding a possible film adaptation of Fountains of Paradise, and the fact that Clarke considers that his best/favourite novel.

    Fountains was the first novel to incorporate the modern concept of a space elevator.

    Anyone heard anything else about this news item [liftwatch.org]?

    Personally, I'm hoping for Steven Spielberg. He did a terrific job on Minority Report. Between that, AI, and Taken, he's definitely on a sci-fi roll lately.

    • Personally, I'm hoping for Steven Spielberg. He did a terrific job on Minority Report. Between that, AI, and Taken, he's definitely on a sci-fi roll lately.

      Spielberg's always been doing sci-fi - however, unlike his earlier optimistic films (Close Encounters, ET), the more recent ones (Minority Report, AI) have taken a decidedly dystopian direction.

      The question is whether or not he's doing this to be considered more "serious" as a filmmaker, or if he's just becoming cynical and curmudgeonly in his elder ye

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 18, 2004 @01:31PM (#8317222)
    I discovered this short story by Clarke through a previous /. posting concerning chess. I really enjoyed it so here [ibm.com] it is again.

    Btw, I remember in that posting someone saying there are more possible games of chess than atom's in the universe. How is that possible? And how do you calculate # of games, with pieces moving back and forth ad infinitum?
  • by incom ( 570967 ) on Wednesday February 18, 2004 @02:17PM (#8317690)
    Article+pics [space.com]
    more pics. [marsunearthed.com]
  • Slight nitpick... (Score:3, Informative)

    by CanSpice ( 300894 ) on Wednesday February 18, 2004 @02:44PM (#8318014) Homepage
    The International Astronomical Union's Minor Planet Center [harvard.edu] deals with naming asteroids, not the International Astronomical Federation. As far as I'm aware, there's no such thing as the IAF.
  • Not the CIA (Score:3, Insightful)

    by ajs ( 35943 ) <ajs.ajs@com> on Wednesday February 18, 2004 @03:24PM (#8318488) Homepage Journal
    Clarke goes into the idea behind his book about Fermat's Theorem, and while I like the idea, he should change the CIA to the NSA in the book. The CIA deals with crypto quite a bit, but the worlds largest employer of mathemeticians (or so I have heard them called) would be far more likely to scoop up someone who made a breakthrough in prime number theory: the NSA.

    It just seems they would make much more sense for his book.

Our OS who art in CPU, UNIX be thy name. Thy programs run, thy syscalls done, In kernel as it is in user!

Working...