LOTR to Become a London Musical 205
PenguinRadio writes "Sky is reporting that Lord of the Rings will become 'the most expensive musical ever seen in London', sporting a price tag of 8 million pounds and a running time of nearly 3 and 1/2 hours."
what (Score:3, Funny)
hasn't this been done already? (Score:3, Funny)
Oh wait - that's Wagner's Ring cycle.
Re:hasn't this been done already? (Score:2, Funny)
Bugs: (spoken): Kill the wabbit?
Elmer: YO HO HO! YO HO HO! YO HO...
Bugs: Oh mighty warrior of great fighting stock Might I inquire to ask eh... what's up doc?
Elmer: I'm going to kill the wabbit!
Bugs: O mighty warrior, 'twill be quite a task How will you do it, might I inquire to ask?
E: I will do it with my spear and magic hewmet.
B: Spear and magic hewme
Re:what (Score:5, Funny)
[Mark Hamill & Backing Chorus] Do it for Yoda while we serve our guests a soda!
[Mark Hamill] And do it for Chewie and the Ewoks, and all the other puppets
[Mark Hamill & Backing Chorus] Luke, be a Jedi tonight!
Re:what (Score:2, Funny)
. . . the theme park
. . . the self-help seminar
. . . the fragrance and cosmetic line
. . . The Passion of Frodo
. . . the Time-Life series
Re:what (Score:2)
Sam?
Like 'His Dark Materials' (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Like 'His Dark Materials' (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Like 'His Dark Materials' (Score:2)
I'm going to miss some of the better parts that will be excised for length -- Like Tim Benzedrine and Hashberry, or Arrowroot saving 300 pages of nonsense by avoiding the Tiny X-Shaped Forest.
Re:Like 'His Dark Materials' (Score:2)
Cant wait for some scenes... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Cant wait for some scenes... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Cant wait for some scenes... (Score:4, Insightful)
Kjella
I think we all know what is coming (Score:5, Funny)
/Obvious
Re:I think we all know what is coming (Score:2, Funny)
Re:I think we all know what is coming (Score:2)
Re:I think we all know what is coming (Score:2)
Re:I think we all know what is coming (Score:4, Informative)
Sorry, that website uses broken embed tags and Windows-specific registry CLSIDs to point to quicktime player. I don't have a "registry" or a "quick time" player. For those of us who choose our own browser helper applications (instead of it being decided by a "registry") here is the relevant link [mac.com].
For those of you with a "registry" that decides which applications will open what, and when, you might want to go here [symantec.com].
That is so HOT! (Score:3, Funny)
And they have pointy hobbit ears!
And look at the clothes flying in the air behind Leonard Nimoy; it looks like they're stripping off, too.
Why, it's obvious they are man-starved bisexual hobbit girls, and nancy-boy Nimoy is giving them no satisfaction...
All in all, the stuff of a very perverted fantasy. Too bad Leonard Nimoy ruins it for me, although I am sure there are those for whom he makes it even better....
-ccm
Re:That is so HOT! (Score:2)
Good god man.
That is just plain scary. Its wrong on every level.
ITs like watching hot porn with a hard on and then have goatse.cx fly in your face. I mean like gross.
Re:I think we all know what is coming (Score:2)
LOTR, the... musical? (Score:5, Funny)
LOTR: Riverdance (Score:5, Funny)
Re:LOTR: Riverdance (Score:2, Funny)
Article text - not that anyone reads it anyway... (Score:3, Informative)
Fresh from its runaway success at the Oscars, fantasy epic Lord of the Rings is set to hit the stage as a lavish musical, reports say.
Producers are planning to turn the book series into the most expensive musical ever seen in London, according to the Sunday Telegraph.
News of the musical version comes weeks after the final film installment of the trilogy, Return Of The King, won 11 Academy Awards.
The 8m production will see dozens of actors portray hobbits, elves, wizards and orcs in complex battle scenes.
"I have been in theatre for 25 years and I know the power of theatre in telling epic stories," said co-producer Kevin Wallace, a former collaborator of successful stage composer Andrew Lloyd Webber.
"I believe that we will be able to make a version of The Lord of the Rings that will be a brilliant piece," he told the newspaper.
The show, to open next year, would last a mammoth three and a half hours, Wallace said.
"If Shakespeare can put all England on stage in Henry IV, I am confident that we can put on the whole of Middle Earth and tell the story of the entire trilogy over that time," he said.
The three books in the Lord of the Rings series, chronicling the struggle between good and evil in Middle Earth, were written by
British author JRR Tolkien from 1954-55 and have proved enduringly popular ever since.
Checks watch... (Score:5, Funny)
-S
Re:Checks watch... (Score:2)
Ugh, thanks for reminding me though, I have to remember to NOT log in on April 1. It's good for a joke or two but when nearly ever frickin' site and forum has a big April Fools thing, it cuts the value of the Internet from minimal to nil for an entire day.
Re:Checks watch... (Score:2)
Ruined. (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Ruined. (Score:5, Insightful)
He responded. "Ruined my books? No, they're fine, they're right over there on the shelf."
I feel the same way about this. Certainly it has every chance of being a dismal, laughable production, but the original source material has survived worse lambasting already at the hands of the Harvard Lampoon and a thousand poor imitators writing ten-book doorstop epics in homage to Tolkien. The original LOTR material is going to be just fine.
Ugh (Score:2, Funny)
I'll pass, thank you.
Re:Ugh (Score:2)
A long time ago in the land of the Shire
Lived a brave little hobbit that we all admire!
OOohhh... give it a rest... (Score:5, Insightful)
4000 recent awards, the actors are plastered on every talk show, multiple console games, 3 recent highly pushed movies --shouldn't they just take a breather?
Wouldn't waiting a few years and then bringing the story back in a different format be refreshing for the story?
Davak
Re:OOohhh... give it a rest... (Score:2, Insightful)
NO! These days when content producers find a hit property on their hands they must cram it down the public's throat incessantly and milk it for every last cent they can, now, now, now! Who cares if people get sick of it more quickly that way, as long as short-term profit from it is maximized?
Remember a few years ago when ABC discovered that for some reason people loved "Who Wants to be a Millio
Re:OOohhh... give it a rest... (Score:3, Funny)
Why do you think... (Score:3, Insightful)
It's basicly a breather - because no matter how it turns out, everybody will be concerned with what he has done and will be doing "Welcome to this press conference about King Kong" "When will we
Re:OOohhh... give it a rest... (Score:3, Interesting)
Immediate response on an IRC network: (Score:2)
Please let it be a prank.
Please please let it be a prank.
Some people will apparently have rather strong feelings about this, I suppose.
Sarah Brightman/Nathan Lane .... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:dag nab it! (Score:3, Insightful)
The Nazgul Chorus (Score:5, Funny)
I met him down in Mordor, he gave me the eye -
Da do Sauron-ron, da do Sauron,
And then he nearly slayed me, what a wicked guy!
Da do Sauron-ron, da do Sauron.
Dupe (Score:3, Informative)
-CH
Sounds good (Score:4, Insightful)
What's next, a ten part HBO miniseries?
Re:Sounds good (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Sounds good (Score:2)
Yes, of course! - and then an animated series (a new one, in 3D and stuff), and a spinoff prime-time sitcom, and an LOTR-themed reality TV show, and a MMORPG game...
That will be a great follow-up to the series of books, the first animated series, the current trilogy (with The Hobbit on its way), and about 14 different videogames on several platforms. Each accompanied with its own marketing blitz, so your kid can wear Aragorn tennis shoes and eat Gollum breakfast c
Pushing it... (Score:5, Insightful)
Now, 10 hours of movies are yet quite different from 3 hours of musical. To bring this to the stage in a successful manner, a lot of streamlining and cutting will have to be done, with a tremendous risk of falling short of the original. I will admit that I was sceptical about the movies, and Jackson proved me wrong. I am even more sceptical here.
There are times where it's wise not to tempt fate, and pass on some challenges, instead of taking your shot at it and fail. Come up with your own original story and knockyourself out, no problem. But taint the work of Tolkien with a failed attempt of an adaptation, and people will remember you for a long time...
Yeah but (Score:2, Funny)
didn't the film come out? Won't the musical tell the same story?
Oh no (Score:5, Funny)
Hobbit's scampering about on the stage in a chorus line?
The deadly dance of the orcs?
Sam's love ballad to Frodo?
I can just envision Gandalf dancing, tossing away his hat and staff for a top hat and cane.
There are so many reasons this needs to NOT happen.
Agreed. (Score:2, Insightful)
i hear you and agree. i mean, it was a large enough leap to turn such glorious stories loose with Peter Jackson (i'm not bashing him, hear me out) to make a movie. When i first heard about the movies being made, i was, honestly, afraid. Afraid of how bad they might fuck those wonderful stories up, ruining all the images i'd created of those worlds in my head.
All in all, i must say Peter Jackson
Re:Oh no (Score:2)
Even worse (Score:2)
(Groan).
Re:Oh no (Score:2)
Write your own Song contest! (Score:2)
"My name is Smeagol
Got eyes like an eagle
Like to eat fish
but I don't like beagles"
I don't know. Maybe you can do better.
"A lion, is eating, my foot off, somebody call a cop". Oops, that's Mel Brooks.
Paging Joss Whedon... (Score:5, Funny)
I've got a theory, that it's a Nazgul, A dancing Nazgul. No, something isn't right there.
(Frodo)
I've got a theory, that Bilbo is dreamin' And we're all stuck inside his wacky Broadway nightmare.
(Aragorn)
I've got a theory we should work this out.
(The Fellowship except Gandalf)
It's getting eerie, what's this cheery singing all about?
(Gimli)
It could be Elves, some evil Elves. Which is ridiculous 'cause Elves they were persecuted wicked good and loved Middle Earth and fairie power and I'll be over here.
(Merry)
I've got a theory, it could be lunchtime...
[crickets chirping]
Re:Paging Joss Whedon... (Score:2, Funny)
(Gollum)Hobbits arent as cute as everybody supposes!..
whats with the hairy feet and tricksy riddle-poses*??
(* sorry that's the best i could come up with)
Copyright notice! (Score:2)
Paging Troy McClure... (Score:2)
Oh my God, I was wrong It was Earth all along
You've finally made a monkey
Apes: Yes, we've finally made a monkey
Troy: Yes, you've finally made a monkey out of me
Apes: Yes, we've finally made a monkey out of you
Troy: I love you, Dr. Zaius!
Re:Paging Joss Whedon... (Score:2, Interesting)
I lived my life in Bagend
Never an adventure to face
I did not seem so bad though
We figured that was our place
Now I've got this ring
What do I do with that thing?
I am under its spell
Gandalf can it be
It's making me so hard to see
Its power I can tell
How it's keeping me
From aging far less rapidly
(Gandalf:)
I see a world endangered
Nazgul and Orcs everywhere
I always took for granted
The one ring would never be there
But its power shone
Brighter than I've ever known
Now we know so well
Nothing we can do
We 've g
Re:Paging Joss Whedon... (Score:2)
It is already a Symphony (Score:2, Informative)
One station will be Atlanta, [atlantasymphony.org] where he will conduct the ASO (Hi Larry...).
Yes but (Score:3, Funny)
The best part will be when they are pretending to ride horses everywhere, should make any serious scene look totally absurd.
Re:Yes but (Score:2)
Re:Yes but (Score:3, Insightful)
But don't get me wrong. I have the same level of interest at viewing this play as any ordinary joe who is morbidly fasc
Too short (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Too short (Score:2)
Maybe if you are a Tolkien fan of some sort. I watched The Lord of the Rings as a theater play maybe a year before the first film came out, and I really liked it - actually much better than the three films.
Good storytelling doesn't require you to repeat every small detail (or even the bigger ones). It is much more important to get the feeling of you being in that story. The films never gave me that feeling. The theater did. But I haven't read the books.
Re:Too short (Score:2)
Sure, Tolkien is not about details. But the books are so rich, not necessarily on details but in depth, that the movies came out as quite shallow.
Perhaps the theatre has managed to get some depth. But then the story will be so changed it should really be called something else. Go read the books, just take your time and be sure to read The Hobbit first. In a few months come back and tell me your judgement.
Re:Too short (Score:2)
...and nobody would be interested.
I think it is wrong to expect exactly the image you have got after reading a book. It frustrates sometimes me too, but at least you could give one a chance. There's no way they could fit all those books into three and a half hour of theater as you pointed out.
I'll do that. :-)
Re:Too short (Score:2)
Then it is a marketing coup, not theatre.
Sad, true.
So they should not try, or give it another title.
Best number in the show is.... (Score:5, Funny)
...when the Fellowship sings "The Hills are Alive..." on the slopes of Carhadras?
mr. frodo mr. frodo (Score:2, Funny)
*everyone*: MR. FRODO MR. FRODO
Gollum: Can you get the ring?
Sauron: you know, that little thing?
Frodo: Im not sure, but i know I can sing!
*everyone*: MR. FRODO MR. FRODO
and so on..
Strongest little hobbit of them aaaaaaaall... (Score:5, Funny)
Two links (Score:2, Informative)
You can actually find it out on a CD here [euronet.nl] and some Ogg and MP3 files in a another directory here [fenk.wau.nl]
a musical??? (Score:3, Funny)
The Inevitable Silmarillion Comment (Score:5, Funny)
That ought to cure the general public of their love for Tolkien's material in a big hurry!
Can't be any worse... (Score:3, Funny)
"I hate every ape I see From Chimpan-A to Chimpan-Z"
Scene One (Score:3, Interesting)
to be recited by a middle earthsman with a British accent
There once was a hobbit named Smeegle
This Hobbit sure turned rather evil
He beheld that darned ring
Yes, that horrid thing
That made desparate humans to wheedle
We must destroy that curse
Nothing could be worse
Than a crazy wizzard
With eyes like a lizzard
For evil, he has a thirst
I'll take my axe and you your bow,
And on this mission we'll go
We'll cross distant lands
And lend one another a hand
So let's get on with the show!
Script Leaked (Score:4, Funny)
Setting: Stern of ship as it sails West into the sunset.
Scene MCLXXXVIII
(Frodo stands on stool so he can be seen over stern of ship.)
FRODO SINGS:
Mem'ry
All alone in the Shire
I can smile at the old days
Life was beautiful then
I remember
The time I knew what happiness was
Let the mem'ry live again
(Gandalf, stage left)
GANDALF SINGS:
Don't cry for me, Middle Earth
The truth is I never left you
All through my wild days
My mad existence
I kept my promise
Don't keep your distance
(Chorus of elves, dwarves and men start dancing a-la Can-Can, stage right.)
CHORUS SINGS:
Frodo Baggins, Superstar
How tall are you, what have you sacrificed?
Frodo Baggins, Superstar
Do you think you're gay as they say you are?
Re:Script Leaked (Score:2)
In sleep he spoke to me, in dreams he came
That voice which calls to me, and speaks my name
And do I dream again, for now i find
The master of the One Ring is there, inside my mind
Springtime for Sauron (Score:3, Funny)
Middle-Earth was having trouble, what a sad sad story
Needed a new leader to restore its former glory
Where oh where was he
Where could that lord be?
We looked around, and then we found
The Maia for you and me
So, now its Springtime for Sauron, and Middle-Earth
Mordor is happy and gay,
We're marching to a faster pace
Look out here comes the Orcish race
Springtime for Sauron, and Middle-Earth
Winter for Gondor and Rohan
Springtime for Sauron, and Middle-Earth
Come up Ringwraiths, go into your dance.
Nazgul Lord: I did get a magic ring, and that is why I'm the Witch-King.
Nazgul: Don't be stupid, be a braino, don't throw the ring in the volcano.
Springtime for Sauron, and Middle-Earth
(Clash of iron on iron)
Goose-step's the new step today
(Oliphant bellows)
Fell Beasts in the skies again,
(Fell Beast cries shrilly)
Mordor is on the rise again
Springtime for Sauron, and Middle-Earth
Corsairs are sailing once more
Springtime for Sauron, and Middle-Earth
Means
We've got to be going
You know we'll be going to
Rankin-Bass adaptations were musicals (Score:4, Interesting)
I actually think it could be decent if it's done right. Professional stage people know how to grab the audience. I've been to several Broadway shows that I just knew would be crap, and 30 minutes in, I was swinging my feet and humming along just like everybody else. Musicals have a different vocabulary than film, and they just might pull it off.
A few suggestions (Score:2, Funny)
Sarumon, Sarumon.
Does whatever Lord Sauron can.
Casts a spell, any size.
Breeding orcs, just like flies.
Hey there, there goes Lord Sarumon.
Is he strong? Listen, Dork,
He's got armies of super orcs.
Can he change Isengard?
All night long, plotting hard.
Look out! There goes Lord Sarumon.
[more later]
*Rohan* (Sung to the tune of *Roxanne*)
[Lyrics open with Worntongue]
Rohan
You don't have to have to put up a good fight.
Rohan
You don't have to sell out your
Guess where the music is being outsourced (Score:3, Informative)
I smell trouble. (Score:4, Insightful)
The problem is that, for the most part, really epic stories are simply not endemic to the musical theatre art form. How many have there been? And, of those, how many have truly been successful? Even theatre epics, like Show Boat or Les Miserables are still pretty small in scope when compared to something The Lord of the Rings because they focus pretty pointedly on people, whereas LOTR is about big events, big stakes, and even larger plot points.
Shrinking the story down to where it would it would on the musical stage, and still leave room for the things every play needs (exposition, characterization, and, probably most importantly, songs) would be almost impossible under the best circumstances, and most of the people involved simply aren't of the proven calibre necessary to pull all this off. Sure, A.R. Rahman had some kind of a success with Bombay Dreams, but what in Matthew Warchus's resume suggests he's even remotely qualified to handle something on this scale? He's talented, yes, but not with material of this size. His solution to staging one of Broadway's most traditionally opulent musicals--Follies--on Broadway in 2001 was to strip away everything that made it so oversized and, in its original production, so thrilling. If you do that with The Lord of the Rings, what's left?
So, while I wish them the best of luck, they're really facing a difficult struggle, and I'm not sure they will be able to pull it off. Under most circumstances, I would suggest that they rework the idea as an opera, or perhaps a series of operas, but of course, Richard Wagner already did that with Der Ring des Nibeluengen, and the less comparison The Lord of the Rings has with that, the better, I think. It will be unavoidable in any case, but critics (and audiences) will have their knives sharpened going into this, and it will have to be even that much better to win them over. I wouldn't wish on my worst enemy the challenges facing the creators of this musical.
Re:I smell trouble. (Score:2)
Yes, there was a Stephen King musical. But it's bets not to mention it in polite company...
I believe the actual phrase... (Score:2)
Although, I must say that, despite the ridiculousness of its execution by director Terry Hands, who staged the entire thing as a Greek tragedy, there was some excellent music in it. "And Eve Was Weak" and "Evening Prayers" were ravishingly dramatic, "I Remember How Those Boys Could Dance" was heartbreaking, and "When There's No One" was very dramatically stirring, cutting right to the heart of what Margaret must be experiencing
Re:I smell trouble. (Score:2)
And what proven calibre did Peter Jackson have before he started working on the LOTR trilogy?
Re:I smell trouble. (Score:2)
Nice try, but I don't think your analogy works. The problem is that epic stories lend themselves to film much better than stage. Sure, it would have been possible for Jackson to screw up the films--it's happened before with the same property, has it not?--but I maintain that it would have been harder than it will be for Matthew Warchus and company to botch a stage musical using the same subject matter. For one
Website (Score:3, Informative)
That info aside, I know some of the people working on this and they are truly passionate fans of the book. I know nothing about the musical itself, but I'm more than willing to remain open-minded about it's quality until I learn more.
ObDisclosure: I work on Tolkien licensed products.
Only 3 1/2 hours? (Score:3, Funny)
Only 3 1/2 hours?
They're going to cut Tom Bombadil again!
Re:Only 3 1/2 hours? (Score:2)
Now, Glorfindel, on the other hand... you know he's gonna get the shaft again.
Of course this story was rejected back in Oct (Score:2)
Already been done by Rankin Bass (Score:2)
It's actually a catchy tune, for dreck.
I hope not (Score:2)
These kind of mega-musicals are pretty much soulless, special effects driven money making machines. Le Miserables the book is passionate, insightful, and spiritual. Le Miz the musical is a sentimental melodrama. I'd hate to see LotR get the same treatment.
LotR has a lot in common with Victor Hugo's book. On the surface it can be taken as an adventure tale, but there's much more to it. I've probably read the LotR trilogy once a year for the last thirty years.
Taco, you posted this already.... (Score:2)
The working title was "Das Rheingold..." (Score:2)
The Hobbit has already been done (Score:2)
It wasn't really a musical, though there were a couple of songs in it. The play basically consisted of the actors chasing the scenery around the stage and wrestling with elaborate costumes while shouting their lines.
Re:8 Million Quids (Score:2)
Re:8 Million Quids (Score:2)
Re:kewl (Score:2)
Re:um.. great? (Score:5, Informative)
Oy veh...Note that putting the story of Henry IV on stage took Shakespeare two very long plays-- Henry IV parts one and two together are over seven hours, uncut. Even then, the scope of the plays is much smaller than the War of the Ring. Yes, the historical backdrop of Henry IV is a series of wars and rebellions that cover most of England as well as Brittany, but the realy story is much smaller. It's about the (contested) king, his son Hal, and a few other key court figures suh as Hotspur and Falstaff. The real plot is the search for honor by these characters, NOT the wars and the fate of the kingdom. Anyway, to cover the full scope of the war/political story, you have to include two more plays, Richard II and Henry V, which would bring the stage running time to over twelve hours.
So Shakespeare did NOT put "all England" on stage in Henry IV...he was much too smart to try that. Pity the West End producers can't learn from the Bard.