A Camaro That Leaves A Wake 391
Artana Niveus Corvum writes "I came across this entirely at random, but it seems like someone with too much time on his hands has taken an old idea and improved on it... and come up with something truly unique and cool: a car based on a 2002 Camaro body with a Subaru WRX Turbo engine (300 horsepower) capable of going over 125MPH that doubles as a boat capable of going over 40MPH."
Slashdotted already (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Slashdotted already (Score:5, Informative)
Google images (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Slashdotted already (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Slashdotted already (Score:3, Funny)
Well (Score:5, Funny)
40MPH? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:40MPH? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:40MPH? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:40MPH? (Score:5, Informative)
ianw@mingus:~$ units
2084 units, 71 prefixes, 32 nonlinear units
You have: 40mph
You want: knot
* 34.75905
/ 0.028769486
So about 35 knots
Re:40MPH? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:40MPH? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:40MPH? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:40MPH? (Score:3, Informative)
Not to be a googlewhore, but who knew that Back to the Future [imdb.com] had any real math in it before they saw this [google.com]?
Re:40MPH? (Score:5, Informative)
40mph in knots
it will give you this:
40 mph = 34.7590497 knots
Re:40MPH? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:40MPH? (Score:3, Informative)
no, 1 knot = 1.15 mph = 1.852 km/h
Re:40MPH? (Score:4, Informative)
Ok, a nautical mile is defined to be 6000 feet.
No, it was defined as a minute of arc of latitude. It's been standardised to 1,852 metres or 6,076.1 feet.
But what is the price? (Score:4, Interesting)
Transmission Rancho 4-Speed Manual
Jet Berkeley 12 JE
Length 207"
Width 75"
Height 49"
Weight 2775 Lbs.
Wheelbase 100"
Road Speed 125 MPH
Water Speed 45 MPH
Fuel Capacity 22 Gallons
BUT WHAT IS THE PRICE?
Re:But what is the price? (Score:5, Funny)
Unless of course the make amphibious SUVs, the exhaust contributes to global warming, which raises the water level, which makes them useful.
Where do I get one?
Re:But what is the price? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:But what is the price? (Score:2)
Re:But what is the price? (Score:2)
Slow Down Cowboy!
Slashdot requires you to wait 2 minutes between each successful posting of a comment to allow everyone a fair chance at posting a comment.
Re:But what is the price? (Score:2)
For something as old as it is, I've only seen it broken down once. It's normal route went by my office in Tampa (when I worked there), and to their credit, there were always cute girls on it when it drove by.
Re:But what is the price? (Score:2)
Re:But what is the price? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:But what is the price? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:But what is the price? (Score:2)
Re:But what is the price? (Score:5, Interesting)
Liter for liter, the Subaru engine is better for this application.
Re:Packaging and weight... (Score:5, Informative)
Most twin turbos are able to add less power than a large single turbo. Most twin turbos are in place to reduce turbo lag (smaller impeller means less mass and a lower spool-up time). This is especially true for sequential turbos, but also tends to apply (although not always) to a "per bank" twin turbo system (such as on other boxer cars, like the Porsche 911 twin turbos). For example, many Supra Turbo tuners will rip out the twin turbo system, and drop in a large single turbo, rebuild their motors, and will end up with 700-1000 HP at the crank. I've also heard of Porsche 993TT owners doing the same thing. That extra 70-150 HP figure is just wrong -- that same figure can be accomplished by other means. Clearly, you're a STi affectionado -- I'm sure that you know more about this car than I do. However, unless there's something special about this motor that breaks all the rules of the conventional internal combustion engine, I seriously disagree with your assessment.
There is no reason why a twin turbo system will provide more power to this car. If you want more power, change the fuel mapping, drop in some new injectors and increase the boost pressure. I'm guessing that a primary reason to drop that American iron was to lighten up the front end. Turbos tend to add weight. Think of how much weight an additional turbo and associated plumbing will add. Soon, you'll get to a point of diminishing returns (in engine weight) where your STi motor weighs close to the Camaro motor. Given equal weight, I'd take the American iron -- it's torquier and doesn't lag like a turbo...and are generally far, far cheaper.
*Sigh* Is he drag racing this thing? Why would he ever want to do that? These are both things that are only really useful in (lame) street races and in drag races. I'm not sure, but I don't think that's what he built this car for.
Re:But what is the price? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:But what is the price? (Score:5, Informative)
Also the pictures of it show an air intake in the trunk. It makes more sense to delete the engine from the front, as you need a place to put the front wheels (which are shown as retracted in the boat-pics) while it's in the water. Just relocate the gas tank to the front. Problem solved.
P.S. I have the mopar chip installed in my car (1994 1/2 beat to hell Dodge Neon) and have been to 135 and still have room to spare (drivetrain tops out at 152mph)
Re:But what is the price? (Score:4, Funny)
I have never heard of a turbo 4 cylinder having a "flatter power curve" than a modern V8. The V8 has a lot more HP at lower RPMS than the turbo 4 (hence more torque).
The only advantage of the STi engine is weight. On an aquatic vehicle, the extra torque of a V8 would not be of much help if it were 30ft below the surface, and diving fast.
Re: (Score:2)
WRX or STi? (Score:4, Informative)
This is a really interesting project either way, neat hack.
Re:WRX or STi? (Score:3, Interesting)
The STi adds a larger turbo, a strengthened block, and different pistons which reduce the friction.
But it's the same engine design.
Re:WRX or STi? (Score:2)
Putting that engine in a Camaro is like dropping a 'vette engine in a Pinto: totally stupid. But maybe the camaro was easier to waterproof.
Re:WRX or STi? (Score:2)
Re:WRX or STi? (Score:4, Informative)
non-STI = 2.0L [edmunds.com], STI = 2.5L [edmunds.com].
Re:WRX or STi? (Score:2)
Re:WRX or STi? (Score:4, Informative)
Oblig. Deadmilkmen quote... BITCHIN CAMARO!! (Score:5, Funny)
"Uh, how you gonna get down to the shore?
Funny you should ask, I've got a car now.
Oh wow, how'd you get a car?
Oh, my parents drove it up here from the Bahamas.
You're kidding!
I must be, the Bahamas are islands, okay, the important thing now, is
that you ask me what kind of car I have.
Uh, what kinda car do ya got?
I've got a
BITCHIN CAMARO!....."
(go find the MP3... legaly of course)
~Z
Re:Oblig. Deadmilkmen quote... BITCHIN CAMARO!! (Score:3, Interesting)
The lyrics are here [lyricstime.com]
'Bitchin' Camaro, Bitchin' Camaro!
I ran over my neighbors
Bitchin' Camaro, Bitchin' Camaro!
Now I'm in all the papers
My folks bought me a bitchin' Camaro
With no insurance to match
So if I happen to run you down
Please don't leave a scratch'
Somehow that seemed more clever when I was 16...
Re:Oblig. Deadmilkmen quote... BITCHIN CAMARO!! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Oblig. Deadmilkmen quote... BITCHIN CAMARO!! (Score:2)
Re:Oblig. Deadmilkmen quote... BITCHIN CAMARO!! (Score:3, Informative)
- Hey Jack, what's happenin'?
- I don't know.
- Well uh, rumor around town says you mighht be thinkin' 'bout goin' down to the shore.
- Uh, yeah, I think I'm gonna go down to the shore.
- Whadda ya gonna do down there?
- Uh, I don't know, play some video games, buy some Def Leppard t-shirts.
- Don't forget your Motley Crue t-shirt; you know all proceeds go to get their lead singer out of jail.
- Uh huh.
- Can't wait to go down. Hey uh, were ya goonna che
Google Cache (Score:4, Informative)
Bitchin Camaro (Score:5, Funny)
It's like a case mod made to look like a can of Hamm's [cox.net].
E-8 (Score:5, Funny)
Article Text (Score:5, Informative)
WaterCar, Inc. is the brainchild of Dave March and his two sons. For over thirty years March has been an avid high performance car and boat enthusiast. His passion and desire has been for building and piloting fast planes, boats and cars. To facilitate his obsession for cars and boats he also developed a knack for repairing wrecked cars and boats. For the past twenty years March started and developed his collision repair business into one of the largest, most state of the art facilities in the world. He then took many of the systems and repair techniques that he developed and co-founded the Caliber Collision Center Franchise which currently has annual revenue of over 155 million.
In 1998 March accepted an offer to sell his business and semi-retired. After putting the finishing touches on his large custom home he built on the golf course in Newport Coast above his 6,000 square foot basement garage/design center equipped with every conceivable tool and piece of equipment imaginable found himself with a lot of spare time and pent up creative juices. This is dangerous combination for Dave March. He was looking for a challenge when his youngest son began looking at amphibious cars. Together they found a 1964 Amphicar and restored it. After all the work, they were disappointed by its performance. It was fun to drive into the water, but once in the water, it was slow and not as much fun as expected.
March threw himself into researching every amphibious vehicle in the world and discovered that amphibious vehicles are much more popular in Europe. And, to his astonishment, he realized that of all the vehicles ever built, no one had successfully built a true high performance amphibious vehicle.
That's when it hit him- why not combine his love of high performance cars and boats into a single, high performance amphibious car? "Everything he needed was right here in Southern California". The best hydraulics are available from the low-rider crowd and the rear-engine drive technology from the high performance sand-rail market. Every drive train combination you could imagine is available for inspection at Glamis. The brakes, suspension and speed accessories come from the hot rod aftermarket industry which is booming in Southern California. The most important part, hull and jet configuration, from the performance- boat industry along with unlimited input from great boat people that are very willing to help. He started thinking he could build a high performance amphibious car from off the shelf parts.
March wanted to build a four-seater, yet still keep the car sporty looking. The 2002 Camaro was the ideal starting point. He purchased a Camaro fiberglass funny-car shell body, added hundreds of labor hours and he had a great looking Camaro car/boat plug. He built the molds from the plug and proceeded to build the first parts.
March built a lightweight stainless frame to mount the suspension and motor to and fit it to the body. The challenge was to make the wheels retractable. He attended a couple of low-rider shows to figure how to make the wheels retractable and settled on using parts from Homies Hydraulics. The motor and jet combo was another significant challenge, particularly getting it all to fit in the trunk area. March wanted the WaterCar to look as much like a stock Camaro as possible.
The first time on the water, the vehicle performed beautifully, with only one significant problem: "It wouldn't plane out!" He made multiple trial trips back and forth to the lake, adding more boost for additional power and tinkering on the jet setup. After some additional work on the bottom, he was finally getting on plane easily and reaching 45 mph. Success at last!
The newest version of March's handiwork drives just like a car on the road and actually handles very well with the Corvette suspension. "It has plenty of power from the Subaru 2.5 Turbo WRX motor. When you go in the water, you simply drive in, put the transmission in neutral, engage the jet, fl
Terra Wind (Score:3, Interesting)
Half the price (Score:5, Informative)
Nice to see that the watercar is 150K while the other Aquada [aquada.co.uk] is 235K.
Now lets see something a slashdot reader can afford.
All they need... (Score:5, Funny)
As long as there's always a canal, that is.
Re:All they need... (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
unique? no. (Score:4, Informative)
Maybe cool, but not unique! There was a story [news.com.au] about a sportcar/speedboat that came up a while back. True, it can only go 100mph on land and 30mph in the water, but I'd say it's close enough to say it's not unique.
Oh yeah, and this site called Slash- something or other posted about the the same vehicle [slashdot.org].
(note: not that I'm upset with the content of this news item, I think it's even cooler to have modded a car to do this than to create one from scratch -- I just have a problem with hype like saying something is new and unique when it's not)
A /. first! (Score:2, Funny)
I like the idea, but... (Score:4, Funny)
I mean come on, that's like spending tens of thousands on a high end stereo and on room acoustics, then playing the Beastie Boys.
Re:I like the idea, but... (Score:5, Funny)
Too much time on their hands? (Score:5, Interesting)
Say what you want about the guy, I bet he has no problem picking up chicks.
carboats are stupid (Score:3, Insightful)
They generally have VERY poor on water performance especially considering for the price of building one of these monstrosities you could have a sports car and a sport boat. Considering the engine on that thing, the boat performance aspect of it is awful it's not even close to being fast for a water craft and it's not even the worlds fastest car boat cross either, not even close, try 80mph but I digress he gave it a good shot.
Car boat crosses then to be very unsafe on land at higher speeds because the hull shape forces air down and builds a bow wave of air making the front end unstable causing at least poor searing response and at worst roll overs and swerving.
This is just a waste of a good car and some boat parts and a whole lot of time. Considering no one's time is free even the cheapest moron with a car could buy a crappy boat working at McDonald's in less time and then he'll have a boat and a car and people won't laugh at him on and off water.
Just FYI my Sea-Doo does over 40mph on water and seats 3 instead of two.
Re:carboats are stupid (Score:2)
If you won't even look at the website before posting your trash talk, try some STFU instead.
Re:carboats are stupid (Score:3, Insightful)
He doesn't need to read the site to understand that a carboat is a technically lame idea. It is unable to perform as well as either a car or a boat. What's wrong with that assessment? If I put together a website about a cluster of 1
Seen these for years (Score:2)
But cool nonetheless.
This was in... (Score:5, Informative)
Subaru engine used in kit planes (Score:4, Interesting)
Boat speeds are measured in knots, not mph (Score:4, Informative)
Pretty decent speed, that....
Morons didn't even check out the website (Score:5, Informative)
1. Camaro has 4 seats, not 2, and this boatcar also has 4 seats.
2. The subaru engine has plenty of power to push a car like this to over 125 mph. The basic camaro RS has less power than that subaru engine and can take a camaro RS to around 135 mph.
3. It uses a jetdrive, not a prop
4. It isn't a converted camaro, rather it's a custom design that looks like a camaro and actually uses many suspension parts from a corvette.
5. If you read the material, you see that the smooth underbody for water use is achieved through moving panels. In land mode, the panels are retracted. This likely disrupts airflow under the body and reduces lift.
6. Unless you're an aerodynamic engineer, STFU about what the boat hull shape will do to the aerodynamics of the vehicle. The original pre-1998 camaro was shaped like a wing and would flip over at speeds over around 180. This thing is sculpted in a rather different fashion and speculation on it's aerodynamic behavior without knowing the cross sectional shape or doing wind tunnel testing is just that - uninformed speculation.
Pitiful negative morons bagging on the article without even looking at the website... How about a big cupful of STFU.
I own a 2002 Camaro SS... (Score:2)
I did that once (Score:3, Interesting)
Pushing a Camaro out of 2.5 feet deep flowing water REALLY sucks.
LK
another video game inspired story... (Score:2)
Forget the Car...Who's the Girl? (Score:3, Funny)
Mirror (Score:4, Informative)
http://slushdot.org/mirror/watercar/ [slushdot.org].
I'm still working on the videos and full images.
hmm.... (Score:3, Funny)
Answers the question, "What Would Jesus Drive?" (Score:2)
Is he cuban? (Score:3, Funny)
Granted, he did a little more than strap some 55 gallon drums on the side as pontoons. But time is a luxury when you're fleeing from the clutches of a ruthless dictator.
Now with better non breaking transmission? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Now with better non breaking transmission? (Score:3, Insightful)
Anyhoo
And don't ev
Never mind the boat.... (Score:5, Funny)
Detail from the site... (Score:3, Informative)
The WaterCar is a fiberglass amphibious vehicle styled after the 2002 Convertible Camaro body style. It is powered by a Turbo charged 2.5 Liter 300 HP Subaru engine. The transmission is a Rancho Type I-4 speed manual transmission. The four wheel independent suspension and brakes are late model C-4 Corvette with stainless steel rotors.
The WaterCar can reach speeds in excess of 125 MPH on land and the drivability with the Corvette suspension is outstanding. Once the WaterCars is driven into the water all four wheels are hydraulically retracted with the flip of a switch. The bottom covers that enclose the wheel well are also hydraulically extended to create a smooth high speed bottom which allows the WaterCar to easily hit speeds of 40 MPH on the water. The Marine Drive is a Berkeley 12JE Jet Drive with a place diverter to control the ride depending on water conditions. The WaterCar has four usable seats and the doors are fully functional. The aircraft style lock assembly assures the doors are completely water tight for water operation. The WaterCar has a removable center mount ski pole which makes it ideal for wake boarding or skiing.
This sporty four-seater makes it possible to drive to the lake, experience an exhilarating boat ride and drive back home again without ever leaving your car!
Bitchin' Camaro (Score:3, Funny)
Re:I dont care about the car (Score:2)
Re:I dont care about the car (Score:2)
"OH MY GOD! A FLOATING DELOREAN!"
"I haven't seen a floating delorean since 2004."
"The way I see it, if you're gonna build flotation into a car, why not do it with some style?"
Mirror , just in case (Score:3, Informative)
The mirror of http://www.watercar.com/meetbuilder.html is at http://mirrorit.demonmoo.com/r_215/www.watercar.co m/meetbuilder.html [demonmoo.com]
The mirror of http://www.watercar.com/ is at http://mirrorit.demonmoo.com/r_215/www.watercar.co m/ [demonmoo.com]
The mirror of http://www.watercar.com/photo.html is at http://mirrorit.demonmoo.com/r_215/www.watercar.co m/photo.html [demonmoo.com]
Re:Camaro with a WRX Engine (Score:2)
Re:Camaro with a WRX Engine (Score:2)
Re:Camaro with a WRX Engine (Score:2)
Considering that he started with a Camaro funny car shell and nothing even CLOSELY resembling a complete Camaro, popping a turboed WRX engine (which is actually redundant because both the WRX and STi versions of the motor are turb
Re:Eh, whatever... (Score:2)
Adding AWD to that car would be pointless and expensive.
Re:Eh, whatever... (Score:2)
Expensive, yes, but I wouldn't call it pointless. A friend of mine had a Mitsubishi 3000GT (might have been a Dodge Stealth actually, but the AWD versions are identical except for the headlights and spoiler placement) and it was all wheel drive. He would take turns at speeds that were just nuts, accelerating through them. Some of the freeway ramps marked with a serious 30MPH recommended speed he'd fly around at 80, and have grip to spare. It w
Re:Eh, whatever... (Score:3, Informative)
The Scooby has a pretty large reliability advantage over the 3000 GT in that it uses a much less complex AWD system that is based around viscous couplers. the whole system adds only ~150 pounds to the weight of the vehicle, and is very well built. I have over 130,000 on mine, most of which occured above 80 mph, and so far all I've done to the
Re:Eh, whatever... (Score:2)
AWD is not a silver bullet when it comes to handling, there are many many things that make a bigger difference.
Yeah, it sounds like it's really a Camaro in name only, especially if it's rear-engined.
Re:Eh, whatever... (Score:2)
My 1999 Camaro can do 100 MPH... (Score:2)
...before it hits the chip that cuts the engine. The engine is working, sure, but without the chip I'm sure it could do a lot faster than that. (The engine is at only about 20,000 RPM... I forget what it red lines at, and I'm in a different country at the moment.) I'm sure it could beat 125 MPH without any trouble.
It's only a 3.8L. The V8 can spank it.
Re:My 1999 Camaro can do 100 MPH... (Score:2)
Re:My 1999 Camaro can do 100 MPH... (Score:2)
Oops. Take away a zero. Heh. :)
Re:Engine swap, or augmentation? (Score:2)
Re:Engine swap, or augmentation? (Score:2)
Displacement
I'd imagine they needed space for Waterproofing, or foam, or maybe just needed to cut the weight down.
Re:Engine swap, or augmentation? (Score:2)
At any rate the Subaru engine was chosen for power and size. It was the best solution for a midengined car boat. You have a 2.5 liter turbocharged flat 4 which gives you a smaller engine, a lower center of gravity, and some good ol' Japanese reliability. Also consider the weight savings over a V8.
BTW if you're comparing per liter output, the v8 sucks in this case.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:125 .... we need to set a theshhold. (Score:3, Insightful)