Flashing Back to the Dotcom Era: 24 Hour Dotcom 183
comforteagle writes "I was taken back six years in one swoop by the 24 Hour dotcom project this morning. A group of german folks at the Wizards of OS conference have launched 24 hour sit-in 'to create a dotcom business from scratch in 24 hours.' As of writing there's only three hours left until the IPO on eBay. Half serious, half art project, it looks like great fun."
Dotcom business? (Score:5, Funny)
Really, I'd only be impressed if they subsequently managed to burn through a few million dollars and go out of business within 24 hours - like most other dotcoms in the '90s
Re:Dotcom business? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Dotcom business? (Score:2)
Hidden webcams. www.hothiddentoastercam.com
Re:Dotcom business? (Score:1)
Re:Dotcom business? (Score:5, Insightful)
Where is the 10 million dollar data center, corporate jet, and 5 million lines of worthless code?
Re:Dotcom business? (Score:2)
Makes you wonder. You could write a simple perl scrip to unroll a 5 million itteration loop in C.
But you see, that would be the hacked way (ie. elegant way) of doing it. The real way would be some wise crack programmer thinking he's doing humanity a favor by reinventing an entire framework over and above all existing standard technologies (php, SQL, asp, cf...) just because the first time he dabbled with one of these languages he was unable to output a date in "12. j
Re:Dotcom business? (Score:5, Insightful)
The real problem I see is the number of people. If it did work, and everyone decided to stay with the business (i.e. give their two-week with their current employer), what would their burn rate be? At 50,000-75,00 per employee, you could be potentially burning the better part of a million dollars a month. And would the results of the company be maintainable? (The pace definitely wouldn't be.) Interesting thought exercise, anyway.
3 hours left until the IPO (Score:5, Funny)
Re:3 hours left until the IPO (Score:2)
The companies would most likely dissolve at the end of the weekend when they forgot to ask what irc server C0derMan hangs out on.
They forgot one other part... (Score:3, Insightful)
Half-stupid. The sad part is, someone is going to buy into this heap.
Impulse is a scary force in human nature.
Re:They forgot one other part... (Score:5, Informative)
Half-stupid. The sad part is, someone is going to buy into this heap.
And some suckers already have:
Investors
/Jon Aslund
Re:They forgot one other part... (Score:2)
Re:They forgot one other part... (Score:1)
It's funny, Laugh...
Re:They forgot one other part... (Score:1)
The real sad part (Score:5, Funny)
Their todo list (Score:5, Funny)
From the article:
* 19:00 Building the Office* 19:30 Kick-off party
* 19:45 International expansion
* 22:00 Concepts and planning
* 02:00 Nightly coding
* 14:00 Milestone 1
* 15:00 Milestone 2
* 16:00 Milestone 3
* 16:50 Milestone 4
* 17:00 Press conference
* 18:00 Final candidate 1
* 18:30 Release Party
* 19:00 Final release
* 18:59 Launch, IPO on eBay
They sure do have their priorities right! All the essential ingredients of a dotcom...
Re:Their todo list (Score:1)
Forgive me... (Score:5, Funny)
[ducks]
Re:Forgive me... (Score:2)
That is so 2000... (Score:2)
Conan says:
(...in the year 2000......): 18:59:30 Run out of cash
(...in the year 2004......): 18:59:30 Take the cash and run
Too much profit? (Score:2)
"No more investments, please! Stop sending us money!"
Unless they're trying to drive up their market value
Re:Their todo list (Score:2)
IPO (Score:4, Interesting)
An IPO on eBay? It sounds creepy and foreshadowing of things to come. As if eBay isn't central to our economy enough.
Any /.er's planning to bid?
PHP + MySQL? (Score:1)
Re:IPO (Score:3, Funny)
Re:IPO (Score:2)
Thanks slashdot! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Thanks slashdot! (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Thanks slashdot! (Score:4, Funny)
movabletype blog (Score:3, Funny)
Just put up a shopping cart (Score:1)
getting a dot com (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:getting a dot com (Score:1)
the root servers aren't updated that often, are they? So there is no way to support them and speed that up
But overall a IMHO great and funny project
Re:getting a dot com (Score:2)
Re:getting a dot com (Score:5, Funny)
"Have you heard of the hot new search engine, sixty four dot forty six dot one twenty eight dot two?"
"Yeah, but it's a blatant ripoff of sixty four dot forty six dot one twenty eight dot one."
"Well, they only had 24 hours."
Re:getting a dot com (Score:2)
It doesn't even have some of the fun features [metaspy.com] of the others.
What does it mean if it works? (Score:5, Interesting)
"Sorry honey, I can't go visit your parents with you, I'm starting a business today. But I'll be finished with it by Tuesday..."
Another implication...as much as our friends in Redmond slap us in the face with the fact that businesses are all about making money and not about providing goods or services, I wonder how people would trust a business that literally sprang up overnight to be in our best interest?
Re:What does it mean if it works? (Score:2)
My company, hostedlabs.com, is building the first few apps to help mature the technology and then we plan on opening thye system up.
Should be fun!
[body bgcolor="white"] (Score:5, Funny)
<style>
body{
background-color: white;
}
<style>
People never used to forget this, but now I see it all the time... People just assume that the background color on a web page will be white, and design with that in mind.
Well, I've got my browsers set to show gray backgrounds by default, JUST THE WAY GOD INTENDED! None of this white background heresy! Btw, slashdot apperantly dosn't allow >body bgcolor="white"> as a subject, even thought they convert "<>" to "<>" automaticaly. Lame.
Re:[body bgcolor="white"] (Score:2)
Re:[body bgcolor="white"] (Score:2)
Re:[body bgcolor="white"] (Score:2)
In Explorer and Opera, you can add JavaScript to your user style sheet. [quirksmode.org] This technique is used by at least one malware program [myers.name] that sets the default style sheet to point to a CSS file that it drops on your hard drive. The CSS file contains JavaScript that monitors you as you surf porn sites or whatever:
Re:[body bgcolor="white"] (Score:2)
IE was the first browser to default to a white background. The great unwashed masses of HTML jockeys never saw the problem.
This is why we have standards. It's a shame few decide to use them.
Re:[body bgcolor="white"] (Score:2, Insightful)
The problem with white backgrounds (Score:2)
Because (Score:2)
So I have IE set to default to grey. I like it. Once in a while, you'll come across a page that the designer had expected a white background.
Also, as a matter of fact, IE does not default to white, it defaults to the "Window" color specified in display properties. Certan people with goofy c
About Right (Score:5, Funny)
"We have no content, no products or services."
"Don't be so negative, we have kittens!"
"Right, kittens!"
"They can play with the kittens if they register on the site..."
"And registration should be 5 tier'd so we can upscale our sales model."
"Why only 5? Let's go with 10 tiers, so everything from Zinc members right up to Platinum VIP Studs."
"Ok, we're done."
"How long was that?"
"We have about 23.56 hours left."
"Let's get some beer!"
Re:About Right (Score:1)
I am a Slashdot sucker... (Score:5, Funny)
Considering I never lost any money on dot-coms though, it seems like a good investment. Yes? Or no?
I mean, their marketing guy got a story on Slashdot which is more than I can say I've ever accomplished!
Re:I am a Slashdot sucker... (Score:2, Funny)
On behalf of OSDN I would just like to say thank you for your slashdot subscription :-)
Re:I am a Slashdot sucker... (Score:2)
1% should equal to about $17 now
The auction [ebay.com]
And ofcourse, by the time you read this, it might be even higher. Congratulations! Pretty damn good ROI in just few hours
How bubbly. (Score:1)
Dupe alert! (Score:5, Funny)
Here's the original [vasoftware.com].
That is funny (Score:3, Insightful)
Whatever happened to ESR saying he wasn't going to let his new found wealth go to his head. What a pompous ass. Reminds me of a fortune I got the other day (maybe even at the bottom of a
"Don't be humble... you're not that great."
Re:That is funny (Score:2)
I think what's gone to his head is the fame, more than the money. And he's so openly contemptuous of the people whose admiration are the basis of his fame. It's like some kind of Hollywood thing.
What a pompous ass.
Ever been in the same room with him? "Pompous ass" incarnate. I once talked to a computer bookstore owner who had him scheduled for a signing. He just wanted to play with his laptop, get the signatures
like far too many dotcoms... (Score:2)
It seems pretty sketchy to ask people to pony up money without much information about what they are buying and without a track record to show that the market for this thing (whatever it is) actually exists and is capable of supporting this company.
However, like far too many dotcoms, they'll probably find someone greed
Re:like far too many dotcoms... (Score:3, Insightful)
part of the 'dotcom' thing is to NOT HAVE THOSE THINGS before kicking off.
however, who knows, they might have invented something brilliant in the 24hours. but they started with a clean table, which was also part of the 'thing' in this project.
.
Re:like far too many dotcoms... (Score:2)
If you get the chance, see the movie "Startup.com"
Re:like far too many dotcoms... (Score:2)
Ok, I confess, we do have a game room.
*points to the Slinky in the corner*
Re:like far too many dotcoms... (Score:1)
I second the suggestion to rent Startup.com!
I saw it a week or two ago. The most interesting thing about it is that it's the real footage of a startup right from the beginning (and to the end...). Originally, a friend of the CEO (an ex-MTV VJ) wanted to make a documentary about the 20-something millionaires and all the opportunity that the Internet brought to young entrepreneurs... It turned out to be a record of the dotcom bust.
Re:like far too many dotcoms... (Score:2)
It may not be a legal copy.
Yeah, but..... (Score:2, Insightful)
--Dave
Did anyone notice... (Score:1)
I need my eyes checked (Score:3, Funny)
I just bought 1 share (Score:2)
Awesome. (Score:3, Interesting)
Cool.
Aj
LMAO! (Score:2)
Visit them ! (Score:5, Informative)
http://dozomo.24hdc.com/ [24hdc.com]
Taken from their site:
What is dozomo?
Dozomo is a quick way to reach every search engine in the world! Just type the name of a search engine followed by a search term, and dozomo will take you there immediately. If you want to search google for "Miles Davis", for example, type "google Miles Davis". To search allmusic for "Miles Davis", just type "allmusic Miles Davis".
Soon they will be millionaires with this !
Re:Visit them ! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Visit them ! (Score:2)
Heh, good point.
I wonder why they did not build a meta-searchengine instead.
Because there are a ton of those, and none of them survived either... Not that I don't agree that it's a much better idea than what they have.
Re:Visit them ! (Score:2)
I typed "googl Obi-wan", and the result was our old favourite NSFW asshole.
Doesn't domain registration alone take longer? (Score:2)
Alex.
Re:Doesn't domain registration alone take longer? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Doesn't domain registration alone take longer? (Score:3, Funny)
Alex.
and it really is performance art! (Score:1)
Yup, it is performance art!
Economics is funny... (Score:1)
At the moment, these kids are really drowning in cash.
Search Proxy at WOS3 (Score:5, Interesting)
The Dozomo team has manipulated the Webproxy at the WOS3-Conference so that when you query Google, you are redirected to Dozomo. The problem is that your search parameters are not passed on. So users are forced to enter their search query a second time and post the dozomo-form. Then they get to google (or whatever search engine they specified).
Bad enough, but it gets worse: When you now modify your search query on google, you are redirected back again - and again, your search query is not passed on!
Querying the web from the conference is a pain at the moment. If I had shares, I would sell them.
Actually this is the inverse of a dot-com (Score:5, Interesting)
I have this vivid recollection of going to visit a Silicon Valley dot-com in 2000. They were bidding to provide the backend for an ecommerce project I was working on for another dot-com (see how incestuous the whole thing was?).
We talked for a while about their underlying technology. I noticed a couple of dozen people scurrying around in the open bay of the converted light industrial warehouse, so I asked the CTO what all of those people were doing. "They're in marketing and sales," he replied confidently.
"So who are your current customers?" I couldn't help but ask.
"Well, our infrastructure is still being rolled out," he answered.
"Umm.. you mean, your datacenter is still in the works?"
"Well, yes, but the application itself is still evolving."
I could tell where this was headed. "What percentage of this functionality we've been talking about is actually available right now, today?"
He at least had enough shame to avert his gaze as he admitted, "Well, we're almost there. I'd say 75% of the functionality is there right now, but by the time we finish you're project, we'll have all of the desired functionality for our product."
These guys had over $10M in funding, and had been in business for four months before we spoke with them. Their revolutionary new technology was essentially an Object Perl framework for building websites. They had no customers. They had no product. They had lots of money. All of their managers were under 30 years old.
THAT was a dot-com.
Slashdot (Score:1)
flawed business plan - no patent, no lawsuits (Score:5, Funny)
From the article:
* 19:00 Building the Office
* 19:30 Kick-off party
* 19:45 International expansion
* 22:00 Concepts and planning
* 02:00 Nightly coding
* 14:00 Milestone 1
* 15:00 Milestone 2
* 16:00 Milestone 3
* 16:50 Milestone 4
* 17:00 Press conference
* 18:00 Final candidate 1
* 18:30 Release Party
* 19:00 Final release
* 18:59 Launch, IPO on eBay
They forgot to apply for a patent!
Re:flawed business plan - no patent, no lawsuits (Score:2)
File suit - 20:00
Fact Discovery - 22:30
Initial Report - 22:45
Opposing Experts' Reports - 23:00
Counter-reports - 23:15
Expert Discovery - 24:00
Dispositive Motions - 0:30
Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures - 4:00
Exchange of proposed jury instructions - 4:00
Special Attorney Conference and Settlement
Conference - 4:15
Final Pretrial Conference - 4:30
Filing of proposed jury instructions - 4:30
5-week jury trial - 5:00
Now that's a nice schedule!
(with apologies to Judge Kimball [groklaw.net])
well then (Score:2)
and sneer, I'll sneer at you a lot.
Well at least it worked, er, somewhat (Score:2)
Anyway, some of their code is working, now a meta search engine that returns only the links that I really want, now that'll be a trillion...
Neeeever mind...
The project (Score:2)
Re:The project (Score:2)
I'm not sure how this can be called "impressive" when you can find meta-searches everywhere, and can even download and install one on your own site from hotscripts.com, or some other script source. I'm not sure if this is even a product. On a story. It's a LAN party with a spiffy (?) web si
Such a typical dot-com (Score:2)
Adam Wern, CEO
Eric Wahlforss, CIO
Friedrich-Wilhelm Graf, Chief Designer
Nadia Gisler, Design Consultant
Joni Braun, Photographer
Tav, CTO
Stephan Karpischek, COO
David Thunman, Logistics
Fubbi Minister of desinfo
Antje Taiga, Businesswoman
t, Chief Strategic Officer
enki Chief, Security Officer
Ben Pohl, Documentation
No wonder they got only to Milestone 2 of 4! (Not unlike other firms we know.) And like dot-coms, they had no problem
HEY ! Give these guys credit (Score:2)
Incorporation? (Score:2)
Sunny Dubey
The IPO on EBay is over 400$!!! (Score:2)
Auction Page [ebay.com]
Re:The IPO on EBay is over 400$!!! (Score:2)
Except that a good software developer can make $1000 for 24 hours of work (spread out over 3 days).
-a
Here's the e-Bay link! (Score:2)
Current bid is $434. Remaining bidding time is 2 days 22 hours. The dotcom is dozomo.com [dozomo.com], but the site does not appear to exist.
-
help! (Score:4, Funny)
Hacked Already? (Score:2)
Looks like Mr. Goatse.cx has already found an exploit and made his presence known.
"Waiter... there's a sphincter in my Zope"
Prohibited items on eBay: Stocks (Score:3, Informative)
Prohibited and Restricted Items > Stocks and Other Securities
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission regulates the sale of stocks and other security interests that represent a current investment ownership interest in an entity, and efforts by individuals to raise money or find investors for businesses. Such regulations place substantial restrictions on an individual's ability to sell such items on the Internet through eBay, and therefore eBay does not permit the sale of "securities" on its site. Examples of items not allowed on eBay:
One of their employees is a MODEL! (Score:2)
Google the rest of them. Quite a motley crew they have there.
Mind your P's and Q's... (Score:2)
You might consider capitalizing "German" next time. I'm not German, and I can't say that I like that country, because I met a German once, and he was a jerk, but please be a little more respectful next time, and put a capital letter where it belongs. They make good beer.
(Come on, jump on me for stereotyping an entire people based on one experience with one individual, b
Re:Mind your P's and Q's... (Score:2)
Re:Mind your P's and Q's... (Score:2)
Well, all I can say is, he's an idiot! If he thought you were a decent fellow before he found out you're German, then WTF was his problem?
Anyway, I've seen pictures of Israel on TV, and they have BMWs and Mercedes over there. I also knew an Israeli photographer once, who swore by German lenses and optics. If the
Re:Sarbanes Oxley Act (Score:2)
A picture is worth a thousand words, but here are a few unless you don't understand. I believe that being in Berlin, they are in Germany. If that is the case then they have no worries about the SEC.
Re:Sarbanes Oxley Act (Score:2)