Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Star Wars Prequels Media Movies

George Lucas to Receive Lifetime Achievement Award 277

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

George Lucas to Receive Lifetime Achievement Award

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:01AM (#10543636)
    To receive the Lifetime Achievement Award Special Edition in 2005, and the Super Extended Lifetime Achievement Award Special Edition Platinum in 2014.
    • by feidaykin ( 158035 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:17AM (#10543670) Journal
      Yeah, in a recent interview, Lucas said:

      "I was only about 40% happy with the original award. There were things we just couldn't do when I first got it. The new award, I am 95% happy with. The fans of the awards may take some issue with it, but the award is for me, not them."

      Spoiling the joke by explaining it here: The 40% figure is what Lucas said about how happy he was with the original Star Wars when it was finished in 1977. He then went on to say he was 95% happy with Episode I. Which proves that the less happy he is with a film, the more happy everyone else is... ;)

      • the less happy he is with a film, the more happy everyone else is

        I wonder how much he dislikes American Graffity. I bet he totally hates it.

      • Well yes. But it also indicates that he's probably like Rain Man since he can whip out figures like that from his head and actually quantify his gut feelings. Must be something ALL "comic book guys" can relate to. ;P
    • by OverflowingBitBucket ( 464177 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @06:13PM (#10547118) Homepage Journal
      I notice Harrison Ford won it in 2000. So Han (sorry Ford) won it first.

      Give it a few years, and they'll release a special edition of the award, where Lucas wins first.
  • by Nova1313 ( 630547 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:02AM (#10543640)
    I didn't know trashing the trilogy was an achievement... go figure... fp?
  • Yoda Speak (Score:2, Funny)

    by TheKidWho ( 705796 )
    Award win you shall!
  • I will. (Score:2, Insightful)

    by nblender ( 741424 )
    Yawn. Who cares? A lifetime achievement award for making a bunch of low-quality plot-recipe movies and becoming stinking rich as a result; and we have to give him an award?
    • Re:I will. (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Penguinoflight ( 517245 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:07AM (#10543651) Journal
      That's just the sad thing of this award. If the film industry had realized the long ranging impact of the 3 originals, they probably would have handed Lucas the award in the 80s. By now recieving an award doesn't make any sense because of low quality prequals, etc... but how can you know something is a classic in less than 10 years?
    • Re:I will. (Score:5, Insightful)

      by mankey wanker ( 673345 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:12AM (#10543661)
      Hey, I practically hate most of the guy's movies - but let's not forget what Lucas has done for special effects, cinema sound, etc. Somehow he was also partly responsible for the film "Mishima" which I think is quite brilliant. "American Graffiti" wasn't bad either.

      But anyway, the next time the special effects appear to be seemless and the sound quality vibrates your theater seat - remember Lucas for caring about that stuff. He's certainly moved some things along which is more than most people do.
      • Re:I will. (Score:5, Insightful)

        by arose ( 644256 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:29AM (#10543715)
        I take good movies in black and white with mono sound over bad movies with excelent visual and sound effects.
        • Then again, you should thank Lucas for that as well as he and Skywalker Ranch are very involved with old film preservation and restoration (though not into preserving his own films...but that's beside the point here...but perhaps after he's gone, Skywalker Ranch will "restore" the original 1977 Star Wars...hey, stranger things have happened.)
        • Re:I will. (Score:3, Informative)

          by kamapuaa ( 555446 )
          I take good movies in black and white with mono sound over bad movies with excelent visual and sound effects.

          It's not just stupid blockbusters. ILM type effects, as they trickle down to cheaper and cheaper production companies, have a huge influence on movies high and low, probably the largest change in the look of films since French New-Wave techniques. "Amelie" used CGI effects in nearly every scene (if just to increase contrast), low-budget "Eurotrip" inserted the Tower of London to a scene of Prague

        • Re:I will. (Score:4, Insightful)

          by NanoGator ( 522640 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @11:35PM (#10548497) Homepage Journal
          "I take good movies in black and white with mono sound over bad movies with excelent visual and sound effects."

          George gave moviemakers better tools. He can't make other moviemakers make better movies.
    • Yawn. Who cares? A lifetime achievement award for making a bunch of low-quality plot-recipe movies and becoming stinking rich as a result; and we have to give him an award?

      I liked his movies a lot, especially as a kid. :-)
      Ahh, those were the days...!

      Only as I've grown older I'm seeing the flaws in his movies, but who's to say a prize should only be given because adults don't like something. I doubt these movies were intended for adults after all, because of the clearly defined "good and evil" so even ver
    • Hint: They give "Lifetime achievement" awards when they think it's time for you to stop making movies.

      Hint 2: This award is being given to him BEFORE the theatrical release of Episode III.

      Therefore, I think this Lifetime Award idea has a lot of merit to it...
  • Hmmmm... (Score:5, Funny)

    by koh ( 124962 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:04AM (#10543643) Journal
    I was unaware that giving birth to Jar-Jar Binks was considered as a "life achievement"...

    Then again, everything depends on what you mean by "achievement".

    • Re:Hmmmm... (Score:5, Funny)

      by meringuoid ( 568297 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:57AM (#10543779)
      It's an immense achievement. Jar-Jar was so bad that it made the Ewoks look like fucking Shaft.
      • "Jar-Jar was so bad that it made the Ewoks look like fucking Shaft"

        I hope you're happy. I'll never be able to watch Shaft again without imagining an Ewok playing the role :).
        • Re:Hmmmm... (Score:4, Funny)

          by Tackhead ( 54550 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @12:08PM (#10544986)
          > > "Jar-Jar was so bad that it made the Ewoks look like fucking Shaft"
          >
          >I hope you're happy. I'll never be able to watch Shaft again without imagining an Ewok playing the role :).

          Who's the furry private dick
          That's a sex machine to all the chicks?
          WICKET!
          Yub dammmn nub!

          Coatee cha tu goo (Shaft!)
          coatee cha tu doo (Shaft!)
          coatee cha tu too (Shaft!)
          Allay loo ta nuv!

    • I think the real achievment here is that, while Jar Jar was completetely OUT OF FREAKING CONTROL in the first prequel, he was actually able to seemlessly STFU and all but go away in the second one.

      I don't think that was the least bit conspicuous :-)
  • by chrisgeleven ( 514645 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:04AM (#10543645) Homepage
    Where is Jar Jar's award!?!?!?!
    • by Anonymous Coward
      Mesah won no award!?!? Yousah kidding! Jar Jar given award by Naboo Princess! Kiss on cheek! Jar Jar no need lifetime achievement award. Mesah still archieve only half lifetime greatness. Yousah gonna see lotsa more of Jar Jar nows!
  • woohoo (Score:5, Funny)

    by Turn-X Alphonse ( 789240 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:05AM (#10543646) Journal
    All we need, now he'll think he's good and remaster Indian jones... and Indie wont shoot first.
    • Re:woohoo (Score:5, Funny)

      by ibentmywookie ( 819547 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @08:27AM (#10543889)
      Indian Jones? What are they outsourcing fucking movie actors now?
    • Re:woohoo (Score:3, Informative)

      by John3 ( 85454 )
      They won't redo the Indiana Jones films because Spielberg and others would have to be involved. Lucas doesn't have 100% control of that series so he needs get approval and signed contracts from too many folks to make changes.
      • "Steve, I'd like to do some work on Jones."

        "George, we finished Jones a long time ago."

        "Yeah, but you know, I was never really happy with it."

        "I was. And after I saw what you did to Star Wars, you can keep your filthy fingers off my flick."

        "What do you mean? Now I'm happy with Star Wars."

        "If you were playing to an audience of one, that would be great. Now go away, I'm fishing."

        "No you're not, you're making a movie."

        "What are you, stupid? Why do you think I'm wearing this silly hat and vest?"

  • by bigwayne ( 650386 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:05AM (#10543647) Homepage
    I can't wait until 20 years down the road, when he releases the DVD of the AFI program, replacing a 60 year old Lucas with a virile 20 year old version of himself. There will be space battles, too.
  • I thought (Score:3, Insightful)

    by jstrain ( 648252 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:05AM (#10543648)
    that that award was for someone who continues to innovate and pursue new things, not someone who does something great and spends the next 20 years tinkering with minute details of said work.
    • Re:I thought (Score:3, Insightful)

      by Snaller ( 147050 )
      that that award was for someone who continues to innovate and pursue new things, not someone who does something great and spends the next 20 years tinkering with minute details of said work.


      He has - you just weren't paying attention. He has caused a shit load of inventions to take place behind the camera. Because of him a ton of people got the money they needed to invent new effects, better sound systems, etc etc.
  • by slimyrubber ( 791109 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:06AM (#10543649)
    For remastering dvd to show a puppet, now with more wrinkles!?

  • by bbzzdd ( 769894 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:06AM (#10543650)

    <Wilhelm-Scream>AHHHHHHHHH! AHHHHHHHH!</Wilhelm-Scream>

    • More appropriately:

      George Lucas: I won the lifetime achievement award.
      Luke Skywalker: No! That's not true. That's impossible!
      George Lucas : Search your feelings. You know it to be true.
      Luke Skywalker: Nooooo! Nooooo.
  • by YodaToo ( 776221 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:09AM (#10543654)
    William Shatner will get a life time achivement award for "acting."

    Although I will say they have finally found a good character for his over-acting on Boston Legal.

    • Yeah, actually I think he fits in well on "Boston Legal"...even though it's "LA Law" meet's "The Practice" meet's "Ally McBeal" (which is no shocker since they were all David E. Kelly productions (Kelly took over "LA Law" at the end btw)).
  • by modifried ( 605582 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:09AM (#10543655) Homepage
    "The Life Achievement Award honors an individual whose career in motion pictures or television has greatly contributed to the enrichment of American culture.

    The criteria stated that "the recipient should be one whose talent has in a fundamental way advanced the film art; whose accomplishment has been acknowledged by scholars, critics, professional peers and the general public; and whose work has stood the test of time." In 1993, AFI trustees extended the criteria to encompass individuals with active careers and work of significance yet to be accomplished. "

    (From http://www.afi.com/tvevents/laa/laasite/ [afi.com])

  • by Goodl ( 518602 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:11AM (#10543657)
    Despite the debacles that are the 'new' trilogy, no fan could watch the extras DVD that came with Star Wars and deny that it brought a lump to the throat to see how the film that defined space adventure for a generation was literally dragged kicking and screaming to the screen, all despite incredible odds, horrendous bad luck and dumbass studio execs through the sheer force of will and unshakable self belief that the story he was telling had to be told. Much as I really dont like how he conducts himself these days, no-one could say the man hasn't earned his place in history and in the hearts and minds of thirtysomethings globally. I can't hear the opening bars of the John Williams theme without getting chills down my spine and I'm sure I'm not the only one.
  • by Dancin_Santa ( 265275 ) <DancinSanta@gmail.com> on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:11AM (#10543659) Journal
    Having the dumb luck to stumble into the greatest movie franchise in history, Lucas has taken that little bit of luck and transformed it into his vision of a complete alternate universe. Had he been any other short-sighted director (Spielberg, I'm looking right at you and your last half of A.I.) the Star Wars trilogy would have simply ended with the dance of the Ewoks. However, Lucas was able to transform that complete story into a more complete story by going back and fixing and editing and putting in scenes that were originally not his vision in the first place. I hate to use the word visionary, but Lucas truly has a vision.

    The problem is that most people cannot understand the mind of a visionary and it isn't until long after they fade into irrelevance that they truly become appreciated. So too it is with Lucas, I believe. Many people are so worried about their childhood memories that they cry wolf every time Lucas decides to change a scene. Nevermind the fact that the whole Star Wars universe makes more sense when the updated (Director's Cut, if you will) scenes are added to the films.

    Lucas truly does deserve this award not only for what rich memories he brought to us when we were still kids, but also for the memories he gives kids of the future. When we look back in 20 years and reminisce about the Star Wars Nonology we will finally see why Greedo had to shoot first and why Jar Jar was crucial to the story of Anakin Skywalker.
    • by Dunkelzahn ( 106055 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:21AM (#10543684) Homepage
      I think Revenge of the Sith is going to change alot of people's views of the Prequels and the Original Trilogy, in a good way. Judging from various leaks, spoilers, and Hyperspace tidbits, I think Revenge of the Sith will be the best of the prequels, and will be more than worthwhile.

      As for Jar-Jar - we're supposed to hate him. He's the dumb bitch who hands the Republic over to Palpatine on a silver platter, so...
      • No, don't give Lucas a free pass on this one. Keep the pressure on.

        The fact remains that it is perfectly possible to create a character that everyone is supposed to hate (say, Governor Tarkin, Darth Vader, Boba Fett, Jabba the Hutt, The Emperor himself, and of course all the lesser Empire underlings who were killed along the way) but Jar Jar was simply stupid, and Lucasfilms' mastery of digital effects didn't extend to making him a believable alien. Maybe they could now, renderfarms are bigger nowadays
        • Look, I don't really like Jar-Jar either, but there's a little more going on in the Phantom Menace than the introduction of Anakin Skywalker.

          First and foremost, the story in the Phantom Menace is about Naboo, the Queen, and some cultural changes that need to take place for them to keep their independence. Sure, we watch the movie and know that it's only a small episode in the grand scheme of things, and that what's really important in this movie is the introduction of Darth Vader, the beginning of his rel

      • "I think Revenge of the Sith will be the best of the prequels, and will be more than worthwhile."

        Now, if that's not glowing praise for a film, I don't know what is.
    • by op51n ( 544058 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @08:06AM (#10543803)
      When we look back in 20 years and reminisce about the Star Wars Nonology we will finally see why Greedo had to shoot first and why Jar Jar was crucial to the story of Anakin Skywalker.

      I totally disagree. I have tried not to care about the changes he continues to make, as I have copies of the original release that will keep me happy, but I just can't fathom his decisions. Well... No, that's not quite true.

      I took a look at the comparison of the three releases, and the apparently dodgy censorship (the red flashes in the prison scene) and Greedo's shooting first, only appear to be ways of making the film more kid friendly. As of course Jar Jar and the awful slapstick he added in the Mos Eisley approach and other inserts also go to show.
      I just can't understand why he is doing this. It removes about thirteen layers from Han's character, making him fairly uninteresting for a start.

      It's not that I'm worried about my childhood memories. Like I say, I have the originals, my memories are intact. The problem is, now anyone who hasn't seen the originals will see the new DVD release, and it's not the same movie. I can fully appreciate a director's wish to go back and fix special effects, and even insert some new scenes to expand the scale - like with Mos Eisley. But I'd do it seriously. Adding laughs into those bits is lame and wrong pacewise.

      Basically, he's taken his movies, and turned them into a cleaner, more child-friendly franchise. I almost wouldn't be surprised if he does release the unaltered remastered editions to get the rest of the available cash, but that depends on if he's willing to allow such violence to be seen! I've lost pretty much all my respect for the guy, aside from, as someone mentioned, what he did for sound and effects in the industry.
      • I almost wouldn't be surprised if he does release the unaltered remastered editions to get the rest of the available cash

        He's been quoted as saying something to the effect of, (massively paraphrased) "I don't like those movies, the special edition versions are the ones I wanted. If you want the originals I'm sure you can dig them up on VHS somewhere, but it won't be coming from me."
    • Nevermind the fact that the whole Star Wars universe makes more sense when the updated (Director's Cut, if you will) scenes are added to the films.

      You see, there's the problem. Great stories, and good movies, don't have to 'make sense' in that way. There's a trick in drama called the 'aesthetic distance' where the audience is supposed to 'buy into' the fact that the performance is an approximation, and expand the spectacle themselves, internally in their own mind.

      Loose ends, paradoxes, etc. are suppose
    • I've got to wholeheartedly agree with the general sense of this article, that Lucas does deserve this award. I think people are overlooking some things when they consider this.

      First of all, Lucas has made more than 5 movies. Second, Lucas has made more than 5 blockbuster movies. (He had to be doing something right.) Third, not only has he made blockbuster movies, but he's made meaningful movies, such as American Grafitti and THX-1138.

      Regarding people's newfound hate of Lucas for his remastering/editin
    • I hate to use the word visionary, but Lucas truly has a vision.
      Yes, but people high on LSD also have "visions." Actually, acid explains many of the changes in the DVD edition...
  • OK (Score:2, Funny)

    by jb.hl.com ( 782137 )
    If he won't make a comment, I will.

    WHY!?!
  • past winners (Score:5, Informative)

    by Pompatus ( 642396 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:18AM (#10543673) Journal
    According to MSN Encarta (hey, it was the first one I found on a google search) these are the past winners of the AFI Lifetime achievement award.

    1973 John Ford
    1974 James Cagney
    1975 Orson Welles
    1976 William Wyler
    1977 Bette Davis
    1978 Henry Fonda
    1979 Alfred Hitchcock
    1980 James Stewart
    1981 Fred Astaire
    1982 Frank Capra
    1983 John Huston
    1984 Lillian Gish
    1985 Gene Kelly
    1986 Billy Wilder
    1987 Barbara Stanwyck
    1988 Jack Lemmon
    1989 Gregory Peck
    1990 Sir David Lean
    1991 Kirk Douglas
    1992 Sidney Poitier
    1993 Elizabeth Taylor
    1994 Jack Nicholson
    1995 Steven Spielberg
    1996 Clint Eastwood
    1997 Martin Scorsese
    1998 Robert Wise
    1999 Dustin Hoffman
    2000 Harrison Ford
    2001 Barbra Streisand
    2002 Tom Hanks
    2003 Robert De Niro
    2004 Meryl Streep

    There are some pretty serious names on that list. My point is, why now? The nostalgia for the first trilogy of films is good and all, but really, they were only 3 movies.
  • Well deserved (Score:5, Informative)

    by AndrewStephens ( 815287 ) * on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:20AM (#10543679) Homepage
    Much as we all enjoy reading about how Lucus raped your childhood, his movies are probably only a small part of why he is getting this award. The man is directly responsible for much of the technology behind modern film making - nonlinear editing, sound post-production and reproduction, digital effects, virtual sets, virtual extras, and now he is a leading force in digital film. Not to mention the great strides he made in marketing and licensing :)
    All these techniques were developed for his projects, and there is not a film made today that does not use them in some way.
    He is certainly more deserving than 2001's winner - Barbra Streisand!
    • There is a significant part of the film community that doesn't see a causal link between technical and artist achievement. Many actually see the relative surge in the use of SFX as determintal to cinema. After all blue screen, CGI and digital worlds are just tools. Tools that can be used to create a masterpiece (Citizen Kane has a similar amount of effect shots as Star Wars, yet you wouldn't know) or create a Michael Bay film. I would also like you to consider a timeline of special effects, in many cases
  • Good (Score:4, Funny)

    by Riktov ( 632 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:20AM (#10543680) Journal
    Now he can quit.
    • Re:Good (Score:5, Funny)

      by Ingolfke ( 515826 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @08:41AM (#10543941) Journal
      Wrong, now he has confirmation he needs to pursue episodes VII, VIII, and IX. No, as a lifetime achievement award winner, no one will question his decision to rework the triology so that Han Solo's name is actually Beau, and in episode VII we learn that Beau and Luke are cousins, and Han's long lost father returns, Uncle Jessie. The empire is defeated, but pockets of control remain throughout the galaxy, especially on the planet of Hazzard. Here Beau and Luke, the newly named Dukes of Hazzard, are sent to eliminate the remaining emperial forces. Lando, will of course have taken the Millenium Falcon, but that's ok because Beau will reveal that he has been working on a supped up ship, named after one of the great hearo's of the rebel resistance, the General Lee. Finally the Star Wars vision, the Lucas vision, can be realized.

      Oh... and I've heard in episode VIII Beau and Luke will run into a group of wrongly accused ex-rebel fighters, named Murdoch, Hannibal, Face, and B.A. Barachus. I pity the fool who misses this movie!

      And finally, we might see N-Sync do a cameo in the movie (that would be awesome d00d).
  • by Perdition ( 208487 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:26AM (#10543703)
    but what have YOU done?

  • by pedantic bore ( 740196 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:27AM (#10543708)
    If you RTFA, you'll see that what is being recognized is primarily Lucas's pioneering work in special effects: ILM, Pixar, Lucas Sound, etc. The man might not know how to direct his way out of a paper bag, and his ear for dialog went deaf about twenty years ago, but he has created some wonderful tools for other directors/writers to use. He deserves something for that.

    • by MtViewGuy ( 197597 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @08:14AM (#10543838)
      I mean think about it:

      1. Industrial Light and Magic essentially pioneered the modern age of cinematic special effects. They took "traditional" special effects to new levels of excellence and helped pioneer CGI effects for movies.

      2. Pixar pioneered much of what computer animation can do, and under subsequent leadership of Steve Jobs the company has produced several blockbuster hit movies.

      3. Lucas Sound helped develop the THX certification for high quality movie presentation in the theaters, and it has extended that certification to DVD mastering, too. A THX-certified DVD tends to have high-quality picture and sound on average.
  • Hmm... (Score:3, Funny)

    by kjones692 ( 805101 ) <the.cyborganizer@NOsPAm.gmail.com> on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:27AM (#10543709)
    I sense a disturbance in the force... as if millions of voices cried out in terror, and then were suddenly silenced.
  • American Graffiti (Score:5, Informative)

    by httpamphibio.us ( 579491 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:32AM (#10543723)
    I'm constantly surprised that George Lucas was lucid and creative enough to create American Graffiti... it's a film that has not only withstood the test of time, quite an achievement for what could have easily been just a nostalgia piece, but has the perfect balance of comedy and drama, and manages to develop many different storylines (most multi-threaded films tend to skimp on any sort of real character and story development and the crossover between storylines is often very poor).
  • by Daniel Ellard ( 799842 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:36AM (#10543734)
    I liked THX1138 a lot. American Graffiti was great. Star Wars 4-6: when they came out, people were amazed. The Indiana Jones still looks good (well, except for maybe the last one).

    That's quite a successful run. Maybe not a "lifetime" of achievement, but a bunch of great and/or insanely popular movies in a short period of time.

    It's unfortunate that the recent stuff sucks, but he's still got a pretty amazing record.

  • by Lisandro ( 799651 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:36AM (#10543736)
    "George Lucas is receiving the AFI Lifetime Achievement award. I will make no other comment."

    Oh, c'mon, don't like that. You'll get yours too, eventually!
  • by damieng ( 230610 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:50AM (#10543766) Homepage Journal
    As always a story brings out the most short sighted posters, upset over the treatment of Star Wars.

    Lets not forget that the award is not for Star Wars but for his achievements to the industry.

    Lucas helped found ILM which helped get special effects to the what they are today. Skywalker Sound has contributed to hundreds of films. THX certification got cinemas, film and DVD production quality up.

    And personally, I loved Howard the Duck...
  • by hargettp ( 74445 ) * on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:53AM (#10543772)
    Yet perhaps not so much for the art of movies. Alas, because I enjoyed the original trilogy so much in my childhood.

    He created one of the greatest (and first, I believe) movie merchandizing businesses in history. I would question whether there would be so many "Power Ranger Toys" or "Barney" tie-ins if the Star Wars franchise hadn't done been so successful.

    He has continually expanded the frontier of digital effects in film-making, and although in recent years his studio's work has been eclipsed by other films (e.g., The Matrix, Shrek, Toy Story, Finding Nemo, Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow, etc.), I do believe that nevertheless he deserves credit for the push towards effective uses of digital imagery in cinema.

    He has enhanced the audio experience in most large cinemas in operation today (at least in the US). I can't say how many times I've seen "THX-1138" digital surround sound by Dolby--that sound system was developed in conjunction with Lucas' team.

    He was first to expand the idea of film sequels (and series) in modern cinema. Would we have had Die Hard, Die Harder were it not for Lucas? Would we have The Matrix, The Matrix Reloaded, The Matrix Revolutions were it not for Lucas? What about Star Trek the Movie I-IV? Back to the Future I-II? If the original trilogy had not been so popular with audiences, would subsequent sequels & series concepts have been developed other major film studios?

    There may be other such achievements as well, but with the above I think there is a strong case that Lucas reshaped how the business of movies does it's business.
    • by rdean400 ( 322321 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @08:35AM (#10543915)
      although in recent years his studio's work has been eclipsed by other films (e.g., The Matrix, Shrek, Toy Story, Finding Nemo, Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow).

      I would dispute that.

      Pixar really plays to different market segments than Lucas's films, so they haven't really eclipsed Lucas's work. (And to be fair, Pixar itself started out as a division of Lucasfilm, Ltd. It was purchased by Steve Jobs for $10mil in 1986 and rechristened "Pixar".). No Pixar = no Toy Story, and no Toy Story means we probably wouldn't have seen a good wholly computer animated picture yet.

      ILM was the special effects studio for Sky Captain and the World fo Tomorrow, so Lucas's company was part of that one.

      That leaves the Matrix. Although bullet time generated more buzz than massively digitally created armies of Phantom Menace, it's about equivalent on the revolutionary scale. Matrix got perceived as better by having a more well-executed story.

      The fact is engraved into Pixar's HQ: "No amount of technology can turn a bad story into a good one" (Although TPM and AOTC were good stories, poorly told).
    • Would we have The Matrix, The Matrix Reloaded, The Matrix Revolutions were it not for Lucas?

      He has a lot to answer for!
  • We'll Ignore... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by a_peckover ( 228357 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @08:06AM (#10543807)
    ...the parts where he revolutionised film making (THX, Skywalker Sound, ILM, non-linear editing) and where he became the most successful independent film-maker of all time.
  • But I think he should win for giving us the beloved Lucasarts company... :)

    Well, up until the screwed up, and then canceled Sam and Max 2 and Full Throttle.
  • THX1138 was an excellent movie.

    The distributors spat on it at the time.

    Considering his subsequent work, I've always figured you want the definition of "embittered cynic" you look up George Lucas.
  • Boooooooooooo!
  • It's like telling him, until now, you've done everything worthy in your life, please, leave StarWars alone. Don't touch it anymore!
  • Awful Films (Score:2, Flamebait)

    I've just finished watching his lifetime achivement for the first time as an adult, and I can honestly say it sucks and blows arse. Sure, he deserves credit for the fantastic THX quality of the films, that sound and imagery really was top drawer. It's a pity the films themselves stank so badly. Let me qualify my main gripes with them.

    In Star Wars, Luke comes off as some petualant child who went to the sooky child school of acting. If was hard to get involved with his badly written character, and Han Solo co

  • you would think (Score:3, Interesting)

    by geekoid ( 135745 ) <{moc.oohay} {ta} {dnaltropnidad}> on Saturday October 16, 2004 @01:27PM (#10545463) Homepage Journal
    that a place that alledgedly devoted to 'News for Nerds' would appriacte this a lot more.

    1) Made Sci-fi movies Mainstream
    2) Set ground work for technology to make better sci-fi movies
    3) Created the most Kick ass Sci-fi movie of it's time.
    4) Independant film maker

    What's with the haters?
    Quite frankly this 'it's big and worth a lot of money so lets hate it attitude has gotten old.' Except for Google. Speak bad about Google and you'll be moderated down to hell.

    • 1) Made Sci-fi movies Mainstream
      2) Set ground work for technology to make better sci-fi movies
      3) Created the most Kick ass Sci-fi movie of it's time.
      4) Independant film maker


      You forgot:

      5) PROFIT!

      (disclaimer: I've loved Lucas' work since THX1138, and think he deserves the award. But this is Slashdot, and the rules clearly state that All Lists Must End With Profit)
  • by Vinnie_333 ( 575483 ) on Saturday October 16, 2004 @07:32PM (#10547526)
    ...some of the events in his life will be altered so they more closely match the life George originally intended.

To be awake is to be alive. -- Henry David Thoreau, in "Walden"

Working...