Clarion Sci-Fi Auction 73
trickofperspective writes "To defray the cost of this year's session, following budget cuts at host school Michigan State University, the famed Clarion Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers' Workshop is holding an online auction of items donated by past alums. Bidding opens January 28th on items such as a signed limited edition of Neil Gaiman's American Gods, a signed, homeade galley of Cory Doctorow's upcoming Someone Comes to Town, Someone Leaves Town, and more."
Auctions for a cause... (Score:5, Interesting)
Or, perhaps I'm just being too optimistic, and people bid because they go insane at auctions [berkeley.edu].
cause/effect (Score:2)
Re:Auctions for a cause... (Score:1)
I couldn't help but notice he's got 3 different printings of American Gods (none of which are the copy I have.) I assume the Hugo and Nebula awards were good for him. H
Do the doners agree? (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Do the doners agree? (Score:2)
Re:Do the doners agree? (Score:3, Interesting)
Of course, Steve Stirling wrote in members of his writers group in early books, and then killed most of them--and all for free! :)
Re:Do the doners agree? (Score:2, Interesting)
Saw the same sort of thing once. Tom Dietz was working on his third or fourth book, The Gryphon King, and made the same kind of offer that Kurtz did. Hardly anyone at the auction had much in the way of funds, so when one fellow whippe
Re:Do the doners agree? (Score:1, Informative)
Disrespectful. (Score:1)
I hope someone demands their items back and gives them to people who deserve them and will respectful rather then pawn it.
Re:Disrespectful. (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Disrespectful. (Score:2, Insightful)
I've got a Cory promotional flipbook, do you think it would get much on ebay? .. Oh.
Pawning your precious for a good cause (Score:1)
Re:I would not approve (Score:1)
However, the description of the auction does NOT say that they are specifically for the auction. It merely states that they are holding an online auction of items donated by past alums. This statement in and of itself is ambiguous and can be interpreted as "the items were donated to the school, and we've decided to auction them off" or "the items were donated to the school for the auction."
Re:I would not approve (Score:2)
Celebrity auctions to raise funds for worthy causes are common as hell in Los Angeles. I don't think celebrities have their personal assistants call Goodwill any more. They just donate their crap to an auction.
Re:I would not approve (Score:2)
If you gave a friend a nice pair of pearl earrings because you wanted her to have them to look nice, and then she lost her job and was living out of her car, wouldn't you want her to pawn them to be able to eat?
no (Score:2)
But your point is well taken.
Re:no (Score:2)
Pride makes people suffer horribly, though. It's quite a shame.
Re:no (Score:2)
I've done my fair share of this, but I've come to the point where I feel I've done enough. If it was a really close friend that needed help, I'd relent, but for now I'm all hosted out.
Re:I would not approve (Score:3, Insightful)
You labour under a misapprehension. Clarion solicited goods for the auction. I, and all the other donors, made their donations in that spirit.
American Gods (Score:2)
Not that I have anything against Niel - AG was a really great book (and I already have an autographed copy of the "cinema release" version (from his appearance at Exoticon in New Orleans)), and all of his work is brilliant (and so different from all of his other work, that's his
Re:American Gods (Score:3, Informative)
comes with the reader for free (if you request it) (Score:2)
Re:American Gods (Score:1)
you've never read a novella (Score:2)
Money is always tight (Score:3, Interesting)
Writers never make a ton of money, with some notable exceptions. And most of those make thier "real money" off of other properties (film, etc). The same for being an instructor of writers, or a student in writing program. They don't have the same types of alumni that can leave an huge financial endowment, unlike the tech sector.
So they're trying to fund things the way they can, without gouging the students for the six weeks of instruction. Most of the authors have pointers to the auction on their respective sites, so I'm fairly sure most of the approve of the use of their donations.
Wow... 2 in a row! (Score:1, Flamebait)
Old News (Score:3, Informative)
We have recently been informed that Clarion's funding from Michigan State University has been discontinued after the current 2003 workshop.
Read about their funding woes here [msu.edu] It may be worth supporting Clarion, but don't pass this off as breaking news.
you people (Score:2)
I'll tell you when, never.
It's a sci-fi auction, it sounds like news for nerds to me.
Re:Old News (Score:2, Interesting)
And... come on... I linked to the Clarion website in the story. You know how easy it is to find the information about their funding trouble there. I wasn't trying to fool anyone.
Let's just chal
A homeade galley? (Score:1, Funny)
bidding for Harlan Ellison's ego. ?? (Score:2)
don't believe me?
"the official home page for much-lauded author Harlan Ellison." - harlanellison.com/home.htm
Bidding starts at 20,000 quatloos on the newcomer.
Oooh. Low interest on Slashdot. . . (Score:3, Interesting)
I think it's because the science in our culture is no longer fiction, all the choices have been made, and the scope of possible futures is narrowing rapidly as we zero-in on our final destination.
Sci-Fi did a great job when it really mattered, and to be fair, it still does in the areas which count. --Look at the subjects which have been holding recent fascination in such titles like The Matrix, Firefly, Stargate, Enterprise, Star Wars. There are some very current and interrelated themes running through each of these titles which indicate what the global consciousness is focused on at the moment.
An X-Files sequel? Gee, no shit.
-FL
Re:Oooh. Low interest on Slashdot. . . (Score:5, Interesting)
Pop Sci-Fi with hardly any revealing insights. Mostly, that is why it they are selling it, its not challenging, no one will be offended, no risk.
> I think it's because the science in our culture is no longer fiction, all the choices have been made, and the scope of possible futures is narrowing rapidly as we zero-in on our final destination.
Okay, then please tell me.
How will genetic engineering affect our lives, or nanotechnology? How will the Global Climate Change affect us and our societies? Will China become the next superpower, or will shee break due to socioeconomical difference between the country and the cities? What will happen to the aging industrial societies? Will the globalism destroy cultural indiviuality or will it create transnational subcultures?
And more importantly, which questions did fail I to ask?
Been there. . . (Score:2)
Everybody is currently living out the answers to those questions. Who needs sci-fi when it's here? --Well
Re:Been there. . . (Score:1)
I'm sure that at some point in every age, some pundit has claimed that humanity had done everything which could be done. There is no evidence that current claims that there is nothing left to ponder are of any more worth that those in the past.
Re:Been there. . . (Score:2)
This may be so, but I'm just trying to explain the slumped popularity of Sci-Fi book sales. I think my explanation holds some validity.
-FL
Re:Been there. . . (Score:1)
Besides, SF is something like C&W music in its ups and downs. It's out there skittering around the edges of the mainstream most of the time, and every so often something huge comes along (Star Wars, Garth Brooks) and a huge explosion in popularity occurs. After a while people just get sated and interest again wanes, and it becomes slightly uncoo
Dreamed all the dreams? No, but. . . (Score:2)
Besides, SF is something like C&W music in its ups and downs. It's out there skittering around the edges of the mainstream most of the time, and every so often something huge comes along (Star Wars, Garth Brooks) and a huge explosion in popularity occurs. After a while people just get sated and interest again wanes, and it becomes slightly uncoo
Re:Dreamed all the dreams? No, but. . . (Score:1)
Your point about the fact that some media never seem to return to the strength of their initial heyday is valid, but doesn't really address the point being argued. My original argument was simply that everything has NOT verifiably been done, and so the need to wonder lives on. I have seen no evidence that this is not the case. I have also seen no evidence that SF is waning significantly. True, the Kennedy-era general fervour for space itself is gone, but SF itself seems to be going strong.
Some industry [computercrowsnest.com]
Re:Been there. . . (Score:2)
You failed to answer my question. If we are currently living out the answers, then it should be quite easy to answer those. But we don't know them, there is no consent on a single of these question. We are only living in the infantile states of the said developments and the mid- to long-term development is far from clear.
> but you'll notice that they're all dealt with in the context of already having happened in such pop sci-fi as...
Re:Oooh. Low interest on Slashdot. . . (Score:2)
I think it's because the science in our culture is no longer fiction, all the choices have been made, and the scope of possible futures is narrowing rapidly as we zero-in on our final destination.
We're certainly living in an sf world, but an infinitesmal number of the choices have been made, and the scope of possible futures is still infinite.
It's somewhat telling that you only cite TV and movie science fiction. And I wouldn't even consider Star
Hey, I'm just looking at. . . (Score:2)
This seems like as valid an indicator of how much popular interest Sci-Fi has in our culture as any. --If Sci-Fi were still hugely valid, then the mention of Clarion would ring bells instead of just tinkling them.
As for the number of choices left open to us. . . The possible futures may certainly be infinite, but the broad scope of discernable differences between t
Re:Hey, I'm just looking at. . . (Score:2)
Moreover, sf is really about just predicting the future and warning people about technological pitfalls. That'
Imagination. . . (Score:2)
Moreover, sf is really about just predicting the future and warning people about technological pitfalls. That's a n
Re: Oooh. Low interest on Slashdot. . . (Score:2)
Someone Comes to Town, Someone Leaves Town (Score:2)
Go Clarion Go! (Score:2)
I'm real