U.K. Says Botnets Good Sign 123
An anonymous reader writes "A UK government official has claimed that botnet infections should be celebrated, as they prove that Britain is a prosperous place with high broadband take-up. Is this an interesting new spin on hacking attacks, or sheer madness?" From the article: "The suggestion that botnet infections have their positive side sparked some surprise within the audience. One attendee pointed out that he 'wouldn't want the value of being number one in infections to be extended to bird flu'."
Don't worry about me! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Don't worry about me! (Score:1)
RFC1149 (Score:2)
yawn (Score:2, Funny)
Politician says something moronic about the internet... I'm shocked and horrified.
Re:yawn (Score:1)
Took me some time but his email address is nigel.hickson@dti.gsi.gov.uk
(email address from http://www.dti.gov.uk/industries/ecommunications/
we should be glad car stereos are stolen (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:we should be glad car stereos are stolen (Score:4, Interesting)
Would you pick a high number, a low number, or something in between?
High number (Score:2)
-everphilski-
Re:High number (Score:2)
Property is theft, (revisited). (Score:2)
I was just reflecting this evening on my way home that it's not much of a generalisation from that to the idea that the best way to avoid being robbed is not to own stuff. Looks like it's an idea whose time has come.
Let's hope it goes away just as quickly.
Re:High number (Score:2)
-everphilski-
Re:we should be glad car stereos are stolen (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:we should be glad car stereos are stolen (Score:1)
A rate is a rate, it doesn't require anything, silly. The original poster's point is that a rate of 1%/yr could be 100,000 out of 10 million, or 10 out of 1000. In other words, North Korea and Monaco probably both have lower car-stereo theft rates than the USA and Iran. That's why he called it a thought experiment, not a math
Re:we should be glad car stereos are stolen (Score:2)
I agree it's better to be explicit, so it's unfortunate the article doesn't specify whether Britain is #1 in botnet infections per person, per computer, per broadband link, or something else.
Re:we should be glad car stereos are stolen (Score:4, Insightful)
That's like... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:That's like... (Score:2)
Re:That's like... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:That's like... (Score:2)
OT, but reminds me of.... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:OT, but reminds me of.... (Score:1)
Re:OT, but reminds me of.... (Score:2)
See, this is why you shouldn't post stuff to the internet when intoxicated.
Re:OT, but reminds me of.... (Score:2)
Re:That's like... (Score:1)
Erm (Score:5, Insightful)
Living in the UK myself, I can tell you that I still know lots of people who don't have broadband, and many of those that do are so uninformed that I don't go near their computers for fear of punching them in frustration.
What the heck is that government official smoking?
Re:Erm (Score:1)
Re:Erm (Score:2)
Re:Erm (Score:4, Interesting)
many of the ISPs are also unsavvy (Score:4, Informative)
Also, because of the purchasing price disparity between the UK and the USA (a US$399 PC might cost UK£399 here), system builders tend to skimp on the additional software provision, as on a spec sheet, throwing in a copy of MS Works often looks better than a decent software firewall. 30-day trial AV subscriptions are also disappointingly frequent
Re:many of the ISPs are also unsavvy (Score:3, Insightful)
Also consider the fact that cable modems (as opposed to ADSL ones) aren't found built into routers (at least, I've never seen one), if the cable providers started providing them instead of the basic modems they'd have to start giving out a considerably more complex piece of kit and wouldn't be able to get of
Re:many of the ISPs are also unsavvy (Score:3, Informative)
ISPs in other countries often distribute routers (Speedtouch 510/530 is reliable and a common choice outside the UK) - and remember more UK broadband is provided by DSL than Cable anyway. (Linksys do make a cable modem-router integrated unit, but I accept the point in that they aren't common.)
Re:many of the ISPs are also unsavvy (Score:2)
Re:many of the ISPs are also unsavvy (Score:1, Funny)
Re:many of the ISPs are also unsavvy (Score:2)
Re:Erm (Score:2)
Re:Erm (Score:1)
Smoking (Score:1)
And yes, being happy with a computer virus is complete madness.
Re:Erm (Score:3, Interesting)
Getting pwned is never a good thing, no matter what spin machine processes the data.
Note to self: (Score:5, Funny)
Thanks to Bill & Company for creating new metrics to measure civilization's progress.
Wow (Score:5, Funny)
This idiot should be sacked immediately. (Score:3, Insightful)
This idiot should be sacked immediately. Someone with such a powerful position should not be so ignorant. Given that he is so ignorant he should be removed from his position immediately.
Re:This idiot should be sacked immediately. (Score:1)
Freedom (Score:2, Insightful)
Madness! (Score:2, Insightful)
It's sheer madness. There's NOTHING positive about botnets. Hello??
Re:Madness! (Score:3, Informative)
It is a "Bliar Cronie Droid" serial number Pinokio653 speaking. They will more likely die then present you with negative news. Everything has to be spun up, presented positively and be used in an advertisement of some government policy.
People keep comparing Bliar's UK with 1984. Wrong comparison. The right comparison should be "This Perfect Day".
Going full steam ahead for it.
Nigeria: #1 in IT (Score:5, Funny)
Nice spin, slashdot. (Score:5, Informative)
The official quite clearly said "I'm not saying bots are a good thing".
Still, at least it wasn't a dupe.
Similarly, if a NIH official pointed out that "The rise of obesity in the West is better than malnutrition", that wouldn't be a endorsement of obesity, merely a reasonable nuanced assessment of facts.
Re:Nice spin, slashdot. (Score:2)
Re:Nice spin, slashdot. (Score:3, Funny)
bad != good (Score:3, Insightful)
In Other News... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:In Other News... (Score:2)
"wouldn't want the value of being number one (Score:3, Funny)
Next up, how malaria shows you have abundant surface water.
a good sign? like heck... (Score:2)
obviously, i'm stretching things with this comparison -- botnets don't slowly kill people.
but this kind of view is still a crock of sh*t, isn't it?
spindoctors. grrrr..
(now i'll go and read the article, and find out what kind of government official made such a comment)
Good Sign? (Score:1)
Silver linings (Score:2)
e.g.
Drunkeness arrest rates at an all time high! - THIS IS GOOD - because police are being more effective at arresting drunks.
Overall crime rates are massively up - THIS IS GOOD - because while VIOLENT CRIME and MURDER is way up, PETTY CRIME is declining. As there are many more petty crimes than violent ones (or murders), this is a clear win
Oh dear... (Score:1)
In other news (Score:2)
something similar in Spain, but with real state (Score:1, Insightful)
It's sheer madness. (Score:2)
OK, it's badly put (Score:1)
Re:Call for his resignation (Score:2)
Re:Call for his resignation (Score:2)
By the same token... (Score:1)
After all, it means even the criminals can afford these weapons instead of resorting to cheaper ones such as knives and/or manual fighting.
And I have a feeling that the home and office computers of this "U.K. Official" are participating in these celebrated botnets... Maybe he'll find out one day... Then again, likely not.
Re:By the same token... (Score:4, Funny)
Monday's headlines.. (Score:2, Insightful)
To be painfully honest, 'crats all over the world needs to keep their brains disengaged and let their IT specialists do the speechwriting.
That brit just found his "career in decline" light lit.
kiddies == rats (Score:1)
In other news... (Score:1)
"antivirus" to blame (Score:4, Insightful)
The problem is that most of these people who install antivirus software (esp. Norton and Mcafee.. the top vendors pushed by sales reps.) have an unpleasant experience. It slows down their computer, it fails to protect them from {{trojan:general}}, and many consumers feel like they are being scammed.
There is another problem too.. people feel that "antivirus" software should be enough. These are the people who buy antivirus software at "bargain prices" that doesn't include a firewall (which is probably good because it would drive them nuts.) or spyware protection.
These security systems are indeed scams. Norton Internet Security 2006 is practically an advertisement for their Systemworks package. The web browsing security is rated as "limited coverage" because it doesn't include parental controls. Instead of blocking ActiveX using a white list, they use a blacklist. Only minor vendors like Panda actually ensure your Windows Updates are applied. People feel ripped off when the trialware that ships with most PCs wears off.
The security software vendors, the retailers, and the computer manufacturers can all do better. The government needs to rate security software, and comission studies to find out why people aren't applying them.
Cybersecurity is something they can actually do something about.. combatting terrorism (especially to our allies) is a much more vague proposition.
Botnets result from highly defective products (Score:1)
The big problem here is that paying customers have been convinced that design defects are normal. Of course the only place they get information these days is from the vendors who sell the defective products or other vendors which have business models dependent on high maintenance defects in them.
Why not celebrate all defects: salmonella in the food is a sign of thrivi
Re:"The government needs" (Score:1)
Ex: Patient's Bill of Rights
Bad example: all scooters must have back-up beepers (the kind used by the disabled)
Cybersecurity is important. The government at least needs the threat of regulation.. in order to promote change.
--Sam
SIGN (Score:1)
Botnets mean prosperity... (Score:2)
STDs should be celebrated (Score:2, Funny)
Whoohoo!!!
Uk Stupidity .. (Score:1)
Celebrate STD's while youre at it! (Score:2)
stupid fuck....
Re:Celebrate STD's while youre at it! (Score:2)
Labour Vs Lib Dems (Score:2)
"we should celebrate that we are number one for [botnet] infections. It says something about our importance and the value within UK Plc"
and the Lib dem guy:
Richard Allan, former Liberal Democrat MP and head of government affairs for Cisco, said he was confident that the problem of botnets would be addressed in the coming months, as network operators wake up to the need to tighten security.
"It's like antivirus. Two years ago, virtually nobody had it. Now, ISPs offer antivirus protectio
Re:Labour Vs Lib Dems (Score:5, Interesting)
Back in February, when few had a clue that our totalitarian Government was plotting the creation of a database on citizens 20x more intrusive than anything else on the planet, Richard was busy trying to explain [theyworkforyou.com] it to any MP who would listen.
He was also one of the few who understood the 'Nazi Enablement Act' [theyworkforyou.com] which granted our Government unlimited power [blogspot.com] under the law.
And he questioned [theyworkforyou.com] the Government on who DID actually seize Indymedia servers [wikipedia.org].
Re:Labour Vs Lib Dems (Score:2)
Re:Labour Vs Lib Dems (Score:1)
Re:Labour Vs Lib Dems (Score:2)
In Other News........ (Score:2, Insightful)
UK govt. officials (Score:1)
... And In A Related Story.... (Score:2)
Spouting drivel while labels demand phone records (Score:2)
Government, smovernment (Score:1)
Re:In real life (Score:1)
It's not up to everyone else to help you protect yourself by employing paranoid and unnecessary levels of security.
No, it shouldn't be up to the user. Why ask members of the online community to be good citizens?
Seriously, some of the wacko security measures that some people claim should be implemented are just plain goofy. A "Firewall"? How fire will keep everyone safe is beyond me
Re:In real life (Score:2)
They're using a connection you're legally liable for to commit what may be criminal actions.
Pretty simple, really.
Re:In real life (Score:1)
Oh, and child pornography! (Score:2)
Re:Oh, and child pornography! (Score:2)
Re:In real life (Score:2)
Hackers are not going to take away all your "performance": Better tell my neighbour that. Her daughter's PC was bogged down with over a thousand pieces of spyware. In the end a reinstall would have been significantly quicker than a spyware-hunt, with the added bonus that there would be no niggling "I thought I got rid of that!" feeling.
Spamming: Yes, my network's protected. That doesn't, however, mean that my mail relay has an infinite amount of system resources. Spam-
Re:what is this idiot thinking? (Score:1)
Re:what is this idiot thinking? (Score:1)
(email address was on http://www.dti.gov.uk/industries/ecommunications/