More Delays for Ender Movie 334
Arramol writes "IGN reports that difficulties in hammering out a screenplay have resulted in more delays for the Ender's Game movie. Despite attempts by several teams of writers, no script has yet been written that meets necessary standards in the minds of Warner Brothers or author Orson Scott Card. The latest plan involves an entirely new script written by Card himself."
More adaptations/sequels? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:More adaptations/sequels? (Score:2)
Re:More adaptations/sequels? (Score:3, Interesting)
ok. bad example.
on topic, this is a book that will only work if the script is killer. blockbuster sci-fi it is not, and done poorly, it'll just make fans of the series take up pitchforks and torches. if they want to hold off making the film until someone with sufficient talent decides to touch it, that's fine with me. still, regardless of whether it makes a good movie or not, i'd be
Re:More adaptations/sequels? (Score:5, Insightful)
Daniel
Re:More adaptations/sequels? (Score:5, Insightful)
I strongly believe it would make a groundshaking movie if only it was done right. Perhaps the book is not known much out of the geek circles because it is marked SciFi and many people avoid this literature genre out of principle. But if you could sit them down and see the story it would reach them just the same, because it's a damn good story.
Re:More adaptations/sequels? (Score:5, Insightful)
Funny you should say that, as the Harry Potter series is what convinced Card to give Hollywood another go at it. Before that he was convinced that it's just impossible to get enough good child actors to pull it off as live action.
Re:More adaptations/sequels? (Score:2)
Why? You KNOW it's going to suck. Ender's game was filled with lots of psycho-babble, with lots of little moments, and the primary skill Card has is that of describing something beautifully, not in coming up with OMFG! plotlines.
Ender's game has a cult following. It's like a VW - you either love it or hate it. And, sadly, Ender's game will NOT be a big blockbuster, but rather something like "
Re:More adaptations/sequels? (Score:2)
Uh, did you read Ender's Game? Do you remember the huge plot twist at the end of the novel?
Ender's Game would be better as an anime flick (Score:5, Insightful)
As a result of all this, I think live-action would involve too many compromises. This is one film that really would be better done as a cartoon or CG feature. Unfortunately, adult-oriented cartoons have not fared well with U.S. audiences, who seem to expect cute little anthropomorphic Disney sidekicks and musical numbers from anything drawn or rendered. Japan does not have this problem. If I were Orson Scott Card and I wanted to see Ender's Game done right, I'd flip Hollywood the bird and hop on a plane to the land of the rising sun.
Re:Ender's Game would be better as an anime flick (Score:2)
Ender in anime: Evangelion? (Score:4, Insightful)
Shinji, we recall, has been manipulated by his parents, by the government, by the Marduk Institute and by NERV, all in the cause of a vast secret project. He attends a school full of kids who are in the same position as he; all of them have been similarly manipulated, all are on Marduk's list, all are candidates for Evangelion pilots. Shinji has great difficulty relating meaningfully to any of them. He fights, reluctantly, causes enormous damage through little or no fault of his own, hospitalises one classmate, kills another, and gets some severe psychological problems as a result. Finally, some extremely weird shit goes down and an entire species turns into yellow goo.
I'm quite sure that Shinji, Asuka and Rei would fit right in in Ender's world.
Re:Ender in anime: Evangelion? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:More adaptations/sequels? (Score:2)
The majority of good movies have always been adaptations of books or plays. Just look at a list of Oscar-winning movies. Remakes, sequels and TV-related (not to mention video-game inspired) though are usually crap, as we all know.
Re:More adaptations/sequels? (Score:2)
That's pointless cynicism. This isn't new. A majority of Hollywood movies have always been based off of books. It's not some new "in the last few years" kind of thing.
Re:More adaptations/sequels? (Score:3, Informative)
Key word above is "supposedly". It's actually not a very creative industry*. The vast majority of TV and film writers are (to put it bluntly) talentless, literarily ignorant hacks. Good writers, no matter what they write, are invariably voracious readers, and in my experience people who go into TV and film writing often tend to be fans of TV and film rather than readers of bo
How else to film a beloved book? (Score:4, Funny)
No... wait... don't.
too bad... (Score:3, Funny)
Sounds like endgame for Ender's Game.
(Maybe we could get Uwe Boll to direct it?)
In retrospect... (Score:2, Funny)
Film's Challenges... (Score:4, Interesting)
1. The characters age from 6yrs old to 12 yrs old. That's a HUGE swing. Them being children and developing are two important themes that need to remain.
2. How are they going to film the Battle Room scenes? It's a 3d fight, so there really isn't a good way of doing it. I think the best way would almost be a first person view directly from Ender, so the battle flows as he sees it, but this would lead to problems in the final battle.
3. The Computer Game at the end (i can't remember it's name). That is going to be an extremely difficult thing to replicate, and build tension with. The build up of hopelessness at the very end will be crucial (more so than in the book) and will be hard to pull of with blips of light.
4. Will they even cover Peter Wiggin? It will be hard to do that as well, especially his rise to power on the nets...
Those are just a few of the problems I see. It's going to be a huge challenge to accuratley represent the book well. The only way I can see it getting done is CG, but this seems to dark for a CG movie.
Re:Film's Challenges... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Film's Challenges... (Score:4, Insightful)
The battleroom is the central focus of the children, battle school, the book. It was the reason EG was turned into a full novel. It has to be done exceedingly well. Sports movies with bad sports almost never work. This will hold true if the battle room isn't shot well, regardless of how little time is spent in there.
I forgot about the psych test, but it is hugely important if they are going to keep the adults opinion about Ender in.
The final battle is going to have to be CG with ships that look like ships, and will cut back to Ender in the cube, watching on a screen. The final explosion will hopefully be awesome.
There's a lot of subtleness behind the children's nakedness... Garden of Eden imagery and all.
I almost feel like they are going to have to raise the ages and take out both fights. The Bonzo one especially. Ender will have to have another sort of killer instinct test...
I don't think this movie can be made successfully. I want it to be good, but there are too many crucial plot elements that won't translate to the screen.
Re:Film's Challenges... (Score:3, Insightful)
This is a controversial book. If they attempt to cater to the PC crowd they condemn it right from the start. The movie should be every bit as controversial as the book or it will fail horribly. The whole gist of the book is having small children as the main
Re:Film's Challenges... (Score:2)
2. Battle rooms scenes should be done the same way Hongkong movies are made today - with a human on a string - those fighting scenes should be really good. If they are given covering uniforms in the Battle room most scenes could be done by grown-up stunt people.
3. Inste
Re:Film's Challenges... (Score:2)
That will be difficult. Probably CG. Everything else is these days... Someone else suggested that this film would work best as anime, which I can't help but think is perhaps the right idea.
3. The Computer Game at the end (i c
Re:Film's Challenges... (Score:2)
Actually, I'd rather hope that they hold off the CG effects as much as possible, short of places where it's a must, like recreating imponderability.
This movie should be more of a drama, an less of an action flic. You know what I mean. We don't want to see some BatMan type beating up scores of opponents single-handedly. We
Re:Film's Challenges... (Score:2)
Re:Film's Challenges... (Score:2)
I'd half-suspected what was going on for a while, but was still shocked when it happened. Had sudden flashbacks to what I once did to a bunch of kzinti rip-offs with a cloaked Excalibur fighter and a temblor bomb, and felt enormously guilty about it :)
It's the shift of perspective that's shocking, especially to our genera
Re:Film's Challenges... (Score:2)
Re:Film's Challenges... (Score:2)
Please, they have tweenagers play like they're high school students all the time. You can take a 16 year old and make them look 12. In the alternative, you can start with a child younger than 6. Or, shorten the age gap where the result is still 12.
"2. How are they going to film the Battle Room scenes? It's a 3d fight, so there really isn't a good way of do
Re:On age and agelessness (Score:2)
Just because someone is 12 doesn't mean he/she is like every other 12 year old. Amazingly enough you can have younger/older characters and still attract people who arn't the same age and gender. If you enjoy a film then you enjoy a film, the actors ages shouldn't come into it as long as they can act well.
Maybe next you'll be telling us no adults watch Harry Potter for Emma Watson..
Re:On age and agelessness (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Film's Challenges... (Score:2)
Whether or not the actors are nude for the fight scenes, however, is not going to be the biggest problem. As mentioned by other posters, conveying to an audience what is going on in Ender's head in conjunction with t
Cause of conflict: Bonzo Madrid (SPOILER WARNING) (Score:5, Interesting)
SPOILER ALERT: THIS POST CONTAINS KEY PLOT ELEMENTS OF THE BOOK
One of the things I see as a probable cause of conflict is that some of the key scenes in the movie, and key scenes of character development, is that Ender basically gets picked on, and then retaliates by beating is antagonizers to death.
Now, given todays mass market, I dont expect that Warner Brothers wants to spend a hundred million or so on a sci-fi epic and then have to cripple potential box office gross by slapping an R rating on it. The main character is essentially a very likable child who is very smart and a great leader. They want to get children in to see this thing. They wont be able to do that if they have to get an R rating on the movie. But given the brutality of these scenes, I dont see how they can do justice to them without showing the brutality.
If Warner had their way, I would have to guess that they would like to see it cut out entirely, or have Ender not kill them. But I doubt that Orson Scott Card will let that happen. One of the reasons that Ender is ultimately chosen is that when he has to, he strikes without mercy and utterly destroys his opponent. There is no way to portray the character of Ender properly by having him pull a half assed beating on Bonzo, or that first bully, that lets them live.
Beyond that, I dont see any other likley cause of conflict with a script. Like any novel adaption, it will have to be cut down for time constraints.
END COMMUNICATION
Re:Cause of conflict: Bonzo Madrid (SPOILER WARNIN (Score:5, Insightful)
They can't cut that without destroying the whole point of the story. Ender's a nice kid, very smart, and more or less wants to be left alone. But he's been manipulated from the day he was born by a government that wants to train him to personally command the extermination of an entire sentient species. You've got to show that not only is he being driven to react this way against threats, but that the authorities who are watching will never help him, and actually approve of his retaliation with lethal force.
If Ender just turns out to be surprisingly tough, but lets the bullies live... you've negated the character. Ender doesn't do mercy. If there's a serious threat to his safety, he destroys it totally by any means necessary. That's what they wanted. That's what they built.
Did Ender want to kill bonzo? (Score:2)
As I remember, Ender did not want to kill bonzo. In fact, Ender didn't even know that he had.
Re:Did Ender want to kill bonzo? (Score:5, Insightful)
He didn't intend to kill per se, he intended to hurt Bonzo sufficiently that he would never again be a threat. He intended to leave no possibility that Bonzo would go away, lick his wounds and come back for another go. So, he didn't actually intend murder, but he certainly intended to use far more force than was necessary merely for immediate self-defence.
Whether dead, incapacitated, or just terrified to ever go near Ender again, Bonzo would have been destroyed as a threat. That was Ender's goal in every conflict with such people.
Re:Did Ender want to kill bonzo? (Score:2)
Well, that's true, but it doesn't invalidate the points by the parent. Ender agonized about what he did to Bonzo and the first bully after the fact (even without knowing that Bonzo had died, he still disliked what he did to him). However, when cornered, his only goal was survival at any cost.
At the time Ender was in danger, he didn't care if Bonzo was hurt by his actions, which is what the government thought made him such a great leader. He had compassion, but he was definitely capable of doing whateve
Re:Did Ender want to kill bonzo? (Score:2)
What you miss, understandably, is that Ender may not have even *known* that he wanted to kill Bonzo because it was so utterly programmed into him. We can only fully realize it by listening in on some conversations of those who did the programming; but we can glimpse it in Ender's "victory without mercy" attitude that he took to every fight.
Yes, every fight. Ender always fought to the complete defeat of his opponent, he
Re:Cause of conflict: Bonzo Madrid (SPOILER WARNIN (Score:2)
Re:Cause of conflict: Bonzo Madrid (SPOILER WARNIN (Score:2)
Re:Cause of conflict: Bonzo Madrid (SPOILER WARNIN (Score:2)
Lame!
http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2000/11/08 [penny-arcade.com]
Re:Cause of conflict: Bonzo Madrid (SPOILER WARNIN (Score:2)
"Harry Potter: Goblet of Fire" featured a kid getting killed and had mildly disturbing scenes involving that ghost chick checking out Harry's package and Voldemort attempting to kill Harry, yet it only received a PG-13. Episode III featured a pretty gruesome scene with Anakin's skin being burned off, and it only received a PG-13. Frankly, someone under the a
Re:Cause of conflict: Bonzo Madrid (SPOILER WARNIN (Score:5, Funny)
Dude, if Warner had their way, you would just send them the 10 bucks, and let them skip making the movie.
Re:Cause of conflict: Bonzo Madrid (SPOILER WARNIN (Score:2)
I agree that Ender has to beat the kids to death in the movie to stay true to the book. But if the movie stays true to the book, then it likely won't show anything beyond a PG-13 style beating.
The key, here, is that when y
It's because it's a wank fantasy. (Score:3, Insightful)
Consider that a kid who seldom fights and is smaller than his opponents invariably manages to beat them to death. He conquers every obstacle before him, commits murder and genocide, and yet is th
Re:Cause of conflict: Bonzo Madrid (SPOILER WARNIN (Score:4, Insightful)
George Lucas showed us all the complete destruction of a populated planet in 1977. Alderaan was full of innocents - it had nothing whatever to do with the Rebel Alliance - but it was destroyed nonetheless.
Were we traumatised? No. We don't see the faces of anyone on Alderaan, we don't see them dying, we see no pain for anybody at all except Leia's as she watches, and Obi-Wan's as he feels a great disturbance in the Force.
However, what if instead of showing the Death Star blowing away Alderaan, we'd seen Vader slapping Leia about the cell, trying to physically brutalise her into telling him the location of the Rebel base? Suppose we'd heard a THX-enhanced crunch as the Sith Lord's black-gloved metal fist smashed the Princess's pretty nose to splinters? THAT would have upset us. That would have earned Star Wars a pretty high rating.
One-on-one physical violence upsets people. The bloodless eradication of millions that we don't have to face does not. It's why Hitler switched from SS firing squads to gas chambers - it upset his troops less that way. Same here. Nobody will mind the destruction of the bugger homeworld, but they may well object to Ender's habit of barehanded manslaughter.
Orson Scott Card's personal views (Score:5, Interesting)
Its his story (Score:2)
do we want a world where everyone acts like a politician? Telling you one thing and believing the opposite, or worse getting into office and doing the opposite?
if bigotry or racism, neither I will attribute to Card, are hidden then how are they ever dealt with?
finally just because he d
Re:Its his story (Score:2)
Re:Orson Scott Card's personal views (Score:2)
"Laws against homosexual behavior should remain on the books" and "Those who flagrantly violate society's regulation of sexual behavior cannot be permitted to remain as acceptable, equal citizens within that society"
And have you read his other books, including those in the Ender world? If he writes the script he'll probably change Ender's name to John Smith, or Yeshua. The man writes nothing but LDS allegories, much less obtuse than Ender's basic innocent self-sacrifice (i.e. Je
Re:Orson Scott Card's personal views (Score:3, Insightful)
So he doesn't like gays? His reasons seem valid enough -- by which I mean they seem to be, at least, intellectually consistent. What's more, I see no evidence that he's ever voted to put anybody into "reeducation camps" or something. Is it not possible to be tolerant but still hold an opinion of your own? I mean, that's kind of the definition of tolerance, isn't it? If
Sort of like Hitchhikers... (Score:3, Interesting)
It won't be an Orson Scott Card story... (Score:2, Insightful)
What's sad... (Score:2)
Oh,let's be serious for a second (Score:5, Insightful)
Screw Ender, someone get to work on Eva. (Score:2)
Mandatory Link (Score:3, Interesting)
http://www4.ncsu.edu/~tenshi/Killer_000.htm [ncsu.edu]
What about Joss Whedon directing? (Score:3, Informative)
So here's what I have to say about Serenity:
This is the kind of movie that I have always intended Ender's Game to be (though the plots are not at all similar).
And this is as good a movie as I always hoped Ender's Game would be.
And I'll tell you this right now: If Ender's Game can't be this kind of movie, and this good a movie, then I want it never to be made.
I'd rather just watch Serenity again.
Re:What about Joss Whedon directing? (Score:2)
That is an extremely lame sentiment (from Card). If I went around with the attitude "my work must be better than the work of X, or I'd rather not do it", I'd end up not doing anything at all. It may be that Card thinks of his novels as being the best in the genre, but who knows what ideas he may have shelved for fear of not besting the novels of others?
development hell (Score:2, Funny)
This movie will be a guaranteed blockbuster (Score:2)
Of course the maker of starship troopers, was not a fascist
Re:This movie will be a guaranteed blockbuster (Score:4, Insightful)
Second, Ender's Game is far from neo-facisim.
Look, its great that you live in a pacifist country like Britian *cough* FALKLANDS *cough*, but honestly - your commenting negativly about a book you never read, comparing it to ANOTHER book you never read, and lumping both into the 'propaganda for the U.S. war machine.' simply to make yourself feel better about
You are talking about two books, BOTH written by soldiers, and both dealing with a lot of inner morality searching of the main characters. In both books, people constantly question the morality and need for war.
Perhapse you should get off your high horse, and actually sample them - before looking even more foolish with your off the cuff and uninformed opinions.
If you want to say 'war is bad', fine, just say it
The twist at the end will be difficult - SPOILER (Score:3, Informative)
I'm worred that the book's plot holes will be shown up with great clarity - in my opinion it's never adequately explained why it has to be a kid who controls the fleet, rather than Wrackham. If the reason is video game skills, then I can see a swing to teenagers not young kids in the lead roles, which makes sense from the studio's point of view but will ruin the empathy.
I don't see the computer simulation episodes being a problem, they will simply look like PS3 games (bacause that's what they will be, there's money in tie-in games). Hollywood never bothers to extrapolate the state of the art when computers are concerned, witness the Nostromo in 'Alien' being less graphically capable than your cellphone.
On the upside of all this rewriting, the longer the movie takes to get made, the better the battle room / war scenes can be done with state of the art CGI.
Re:The twist at the end will be difficult - SPOILE (Score:2)
Re:Plot hole? (Score:3, Funny)
In other words, you go to war with the kids you have, not the kids you want?
-a
Dullest Sci-fi book I ever read (Score:5, Funny)
that I found Enders Games to be the dullest sci fi book I've ever
read and in fact I got so bored I gave up 3/4 way through.
The only other book that got even remotely close in tedium rating
was Radix by A. A. Attanasio.
Enders Game - great book for people who rate political allegory above
anything remotely resembling a good plot.
Re:Dullest Sci-fi book I ever read (Score:2)
Still waiting for Rendezvous with Rama (Score:2)
Better Card than some Hollywood Executive (Score:2)
The author's own writing most likely will make the movie more unique and interesting, and true to his own vision. Hopefully the director will be someone who works hard to get the right shot.
Remember the enemy's political correctness is down (Score:2)
I personally could care less about his personal religion or what he thinks of gays or blacks or chefs. It doesn't matter to me -- he doesn't seem to have any opinion of me, so I'll just let him write.
And write he does. Ender's Game really was such a key element in my youth and I know it was the same of many of my friends. I do
The way it should be... (Score:2)
Every book-gone-movie with a still-living author should be done this way. If the author isn't willing or able to write the entire script, they should be actively involoved in the process- deciding which plot elements are required, approving dialogue, essentially editing the script as it's being created... Sure, not every author is suited for this kind of thinking (ahem: stephenson and his unwillingness to even edit his books down).
Maybe do a miniseries instead? (Score:3, Interesting)
This would allow for the actors to grow physically... start them at just before puberty and hope that they get growth spurts, and as actors. In general it would let the story develop more fully and on a timeline more consistent with the novel... I don't think I sat down and read the whole thing in one night, longer stories can be more interesting because you have to stop and think about the events between reading periods, so take advantage of that.
On the business side of things, they could use the time and revenue to develop the CGI over years instead of months and would be able to reuse the models, effects, etc. and incrementally improve upon them as the CGI becomes more important in the story. The revenue from commercials could seriously offset this development and allow for a really good movie at the end instead of having to blow the whole budget on CGI they could spend more on 'getting it right'.
For the actors / kids this would really give them the time to 'become the characters' as they could start off as regular kids with a few quirks and grow into the personalities that make the book powerful.
For the audience... well how big is the audience for this movie right now? I know very few people outside of sci-fi fans who have read this book unless they were assigned it as summer reading in high school. A TV series could certainly grow the audience size and bring them up to speed on the story at the same time. I hate movies that have to tell this huge backstory because the meat of the plot is at the end but you won't understand the motivations of the characters without the back story.... spend more time in the movie on the events that unfold and let the characters just be who they are the whole time without having to explain how they got to be the way they are.
As a side note, it would be very interesting to do some web based tie in 'marketing' by creating a web community around the idea of Peters forums... where people could discuss the implications of the events in the show...
the downside to all of this is that we already know how it ends... it'd be really cool to not know and have a series that builds up the tension, with a web based extras feature for creating anticipation and a big movie at the end to wrap it all up in a final crescendo.
Production delays (Score:3, Funny)
Re:uh oh... (Score:5, Informative)
As for your question, I think Card started out as a playwright before switching to novels. I'm not sure, but I seem to have picked up this piece of trivia from one of his introductions.
Re:uh oh... (Score:3, Insightful)
According to Robert McKee, [amazon.com] plays are natural venues for dialog, novels are natural venues for inner landscape (thoughts), while the screen needs a more visual approach.
Just because someone demonstrates expertise in both novel-writing and playwriting doesn't mean they can write a good screen play. (Though if I had to bet on whether someone can write a good first screen play I wouldn't hesitate to put my money on Card.)
Re:uh oh... (Score:3, Interesting)
Warner is still strongly committed to making Ender's Game into a great movie, and we agreed to another year or so of option, starting with a new script written by me (a page-one rewrite not based on any previous script, including mine). Guess how I'll be spending my Christmas vacation.
This is very promising, I think. As far as I know, all other elements of the team remain together. I will be working closely with Chartoff P
Re:uh oh... (Score:5, Interesting)
I only hope the movie is as good a quality as the books and are of LotR quality adaption and not a HP quality adaption (the last two movies have really fallen short). Keep the movie as short as you can without cutting down the story. Everything you need and nothing you don't. EG was always deeply about the characters and what is going on inside and between them. That aspect must be maintained. We need to feel the need and the pain of all the characters.
Following the tangent offtopic (Score:3, Insightful)
The last thing I want to see is a LotR-quality movie adaptation of a good book.
The Lord of the Rings movies are very good movies. The camera work, the special effects, the acting, the directing, are all very very good. The trouble is that they aren't good adaptations of the books. It is understandable that plot shortcuts need to be taken when adapting a book to a movie. It is also obv
Goodbye karma (Score:3, Interesting)
Can't speak for the rest of the series, but I thought the original sucked. The premise of it - that war in space is so enormously more difficult than other forms of warfare, that you needed not only life-long training, but to be actually genetically engineered to do it - was ludicrous. Think back to 1940. Aviation was in its infancy, and no one really knew how to co
Re:uh oh... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:uh oh... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:uh oh... (Score:2)
Card is better than you think (Score:3, Informative)
This delay is incredible. I remember looking over an early version of the script about 5-6 years ago for a few minutes (someone who know him had a copy and I'm from his hometown). I can't remember any content, but I know it's been in the talks forever.
Just like DNF
Re:Harsh.. (Score:4, Funny)
Right! Cuz there's no more right-wing, gung-ho, pro-war establishment than today's Hollywood. Damn wingnuts...
Re:Harsh.. (Score:4, Funny)
Are we even talking about the same Orson Scott Card here?
Re:Harsh.. (Score:2)
Whatever conclusions you can draw about Orson Scott Card from his behaviour have absolutely no weight when discussing the themes of his book.
Re:Harsh.. (Score:4, Insightful)
While plenty of readers have free-associated their way into believing that Ender's Game had a pacifist ideal, the fact of the reality is that Card, being the man he is, probably intended it to have the opposite meaning. The world of Ender in Card's eyes is not a dystopia as many readers have thought, but an utopia. The way the war is won at the end of the book, regardless of whatever remorse and respect for the enemy is felt, was how Card thought it should be fought - without diplomacy, without mercy, without belief in innocence, and to the ultimate end.
Let's not forget, the only way the cycle ends is by the creation of a new all powerful authority which would exert total dominance over all others. There's no anti-war message here. Wars are just means to an end - the eventual total consolidation of power.
Re:Harsh.. (Score:2)
So you're saying that if I read a book, and get out of it a certain meaning, that meaning is suddenly no longer valid when I discover the author didn't mean to put it there? I don't know what school of literature criticism you went to.
Who cares what Card intend Ender's Game to be? Unless you treat the text as the only authority on it's own meaning, analysis just becomes a constant game of second-guessing the author.
Re:Harsh.. (Score:2, Interesting)
http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2005/5/28/22428/703
And this.
http://www4.ncsu.edu/~tenshi/Killer_000.htm [ncsu.edu]
Re:Harsh.. (Score:2)
The "Innocent Killer" article, which I've read before, bases it's conclusions on several premises. If you agree with these premises, then the conclusions it presents follow on logically. If you don't, then the conclusions it makes are irrelevent.
One of premises the essay makes is the assertion that no blame is attached to Ender's genocide or murders, and that Ender's own feelings of guilt and remorse are just
Yes, the k5 link does. (Score:2)
Re:Harsh.. (Score:2)
1. Accept Jebus as your savior.
2. Russia wants to take over the world.
Yeah, OK, I guess that to be strictly accurate there is a third message.
3. Card is batshit crazy.
Re:Harsh.. (Score:4, Insightful)
He invents prefectly evil enemies with no redeeming qualities. They are foils; fabricated devices for creating lots of guiltless Ender vs evil battles.
At the very end of the book, Ender communicates with the last remaining Hive Queen. He learns that the buggers were not the ravaging hordes earth thought them, but intelligent beings. He learns that the war between humans and the buggers occurred because the two races could not understand each other. He then writes the book that eventually turns himself into a genocidal monster in the eyes of the public.
If I remember right, in the end Ender gets to have his cake and eat it too. He gets to be the hero for defeating those nasty nasty bugs, but he gets to remain innocent because he didn't know he was committing genocide
Except that he condemns himself as a genocide, and turns the popular opinion of him towards that pole, so that eventually his name is as reviled as Hitler's. Part of the premise of the books is the concept of a perfect general: one who shows sufficient empathy to totally understand his enemy, but one also willing to totally exterminate what he has empathy for. The only way to pull off that combination is by the trickery used by Ender's superiors. Ender doesn't get to have his cake and eat it too - he spends the rest of his very long life atoning for his cake-eating.
Card is a Mormon. Mormons love to seperate people into "worthy" and "unworthy" categories. I know because my family is mormon.
It looks like someone has a bone to pick with the Mormon religion, and is attacking Ender's Game, not because of any particular lack of literary merit, but because it happens to have been penned by a Mormon.
Re:Harsh.. (Score:3, Funny)
Of course I've read it. (Score:2)
I think the original poster may have been referring to Stilson and Bonzo. Ender beats them both to death, remember? And through some authorial legerdemain, it's not really his fault and he gets to feel real bad about it because, y'know, they made him do it. That didn't strike you as a bit of a stacked deck on Card's part?
Ender doesn't get to have his cake and
Screen writing != Novels (Score:3, Insightful)
John Varley wrote the screenplay for Millennium and turned a classic short story into the worst film made by anybody, anywhere.
Good writers think in a much too overblown, theatrical style. It just doesn't translate to the screen.
I wasn't much impressed with the episode which William Gibson wrote for the X files, either.
Re:Screen writing != Novels (Score:2)
Often that is true. Card, how ever, is a playwright turned author. I think he'll do ok ...
Re:Screen writing != Novels (Score:2)
I think the production must have thrown an OutOfMoneyException there...
I just couldn't watch that film. Eventually the book came out and it was pretty good.
The five years since The Golden Globe are almost up. I must start scanning the book shops again.
Re:Here's the thing... (Score:2, Interesting)
Most. Flattering. Troll. EVAR. (Score:4, Interesting)