DVD Security Group Says It Has Fixed AACS Flaws 388
SkillZ wrote to mention an article at the IBT site discussing a fix to the security breech of the HD DVD and Blu-ray media formats. "Makers of software for playing the discs on computers will offer patches containing new keys and closing the hole that allowed observant hackers to discover ways to strip high-def DVDs of their protection. On Monday, the group that developed the Advanced Access Content System said it had worked with device makers to deactivate those keys and refresh them with a new set."
i'm not so sure... (Score:5, Insightful)
Do they not understand, that if you can view it, you can copy it?
On the other hand, maybe they do understand, and HD-DVD/Blu-Ray 2.0 will offer only un-viewable content. Step 3, profit!
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re:i'm not so sure... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:i'm not so sure... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:i'm not so sure... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:i'm not so sure... (Score:5, Insightful)
Besides we've been here before with DVD region encoding. Everyone got fed up and bought cheap region free DVD players as soon as the Chinese figured out there was a market for them.
Re:i'm not so sure... (Score:4, Informative)
For example. I have a DVD player that made by a no-nane Chinese brand, bought for 30UKP (around 60USD). It's not region free but can be unlocked by a magic button press combination on the remote. Instructions for said inputting magic combination were given to me at the shop when I bought it. It plays anything I throw at it. Even half arsed DVD rips that I failed to burn correctly.
On the other hand, my father has an expensive Sony DVD player. It's region locked, doesn't upscale for his HDTV and takes great offence if anything is slightly out of spec on the DVD disc.
Now to bring this vaguely back on topic, from a consumer point of view, which is better? I suspect those without any knowledge of region encoding (or in the case of HD-DVD, DRM) most would simply conclude the more expensive player is 'broken' and opt for the cheaper region free/DRMless player.
Fair enough, at the moment with HD-DVD they do not have a choice. Bottom line is, while the average consumer might not care about their 'digital rights' they dam well care about their shiny new disks working in their shiny new HD-DVD player. This has the same beneficial effect to my mind, the end of DRM. The movie industry pisses off the average consumer at their peril.
Re:i'm not so sure... (Score:4, Interesting)
So I missed my parental opportunity to reduce the media consum of my children, went to an online shop and ordered the cheapest DVD player I could get for a mere 30 EUR (at the time just US$25), and - oh wonder! - all the scratched DVDs play again, additionally the DVDs my wellmeaning sister-in-law brought from the U.S., which didn't play before, and I can also look at the burned CD with all my family pictures, play MP3 CDs...
The expensive DVD player from Sony now sits in the kitchen and occasionally plays a normal music CD, when there is nothing in the FM worth listening to.
MTBF (Score:3, Funny)
So, runnning 24/7/365, how long does a Sony DVD player work?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
They were already there. So why do they keep working on it? The answer is simple: That's not the goal.
Seriously. You think my neighbor (or any of my family for that matter) could extract a volume key? I would need detailed instructions to do it. No, this already offers the minimal piracy protection that you think is the goal. And nothing short of 100% fool
ps3 cell folding pirates (Score:5, Interesting)
make bluray popular could be used to actually crack the keys the fastest.
Re:ps3 cell folding pirates (Score:5, Insightful)
It's really important that everyone understand that AACS copy protection cannot be brute forced. They're using AES for the actual encryption - if someone wrote a program that could crack that directly the news would be a lot more significant than "DVD copy protection hacked".
Given that AES won't be cracked, any attack on AACS copy protection must be a key recovery attack. Luckily, key recovery attacks aren't that hard when you get a key with every player you buy. But... the fact that cracking AES is hard means that reading HD-DVD/BluRay disks may become completely impossible when players are no longer available.
Hacking something together to read a Beta tape is possible. Annoying. It might cost tens of thousands of dollars to build. But it's possible - it's just analog magnetic patterns on a tape. Reading an HD-DVD without a HD-DVD player won't be possible. That'll be a serious issue for historians in the future, if people don't leave enough pirated DVD-R's around with the unencrypted content on them.
Re:i'm not so sure... (Score:5, Interesting)
Unfortunately, high prices and the lack of working copies/backups makes the legal offerings un-attractive for many. I have kids. I have cases that used to contain working DVD's. Lack of backups is a problem. I'm moving to a Linux Media Center PC. This new format is incompatible. A media server is a much better solution for most families than a shelf of out of order/broken/lost DVD's. The inability to make a backup/working copy is a crime. DVD's in the home make as much sense as a CD player tethered to your iPod instead of a hard drive. Kids don't take CD cases to school anymore. They know they get stolen, lost, broken, etc. They rip the CD's at home and load them on their iPod with the originals safely stored away.
SONY Dreamworks doesn't get it. I bought Open Season. It has some copy protection on it besides CSS. Guess which film won't be in the Media Center? Guess which brand I'm not buying in the future? Chances are that title won't be watched much simply because it's inconvienent. It's like copy protection on CD's. The kids have iPods. They rip their CD's. CD's that don't work are remembered. That artist and label get a critical review on their next release. Kids instead of buying CD's they can't use, look elsewhere such as P-P and sneakernet. Copy protection (Defective product) sends buying consumers elsewhere.
I remember what CD's and DVD's can't be ripped and who put them out.
Since I did buy Open Season, I will be looking for an already ripped copy or a solution to rip it myself. So far, the rip it myself solutions seem to be mostly commercial offerings.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
That will rip incorrectly most of the time; you need to do prescaling using -vf crop=w:h:x:y,scale=x:y,expand=x:y and data you can get from the stdout of mplayer dvd://[title] -chapter [chapter]
Still, there ain't nothin' like gettin' yer hands dirtied on a command line.
You misunderstand the market (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:i'm not so sure... (Score:4, Insightful)
Used to be, industry considered the ridicolous size of CDs protection enough -- 700MB or thereabout would take forever to download, and be completely cost-prohibitive to store on a hard-disc anyway.
Then lossy compression came, and gave results that are acceptable to 99% of the listeners for 1/8th the size or thereabouts, which means we're at less than 100MB for a CD.
Then bandwith grew -- 28.8 gave way to 56.6 gave way to 128kbps and then on to broadband -- initially 700kbps or thereabouts, today typically 2-4Mbps in the USA, 5 - 25 mbps in Norway.
Even at the lowest speed offered by my ISP (6 Mbps symetrical), downloading a 100MB album takes less than a minute and a half, which is trivial.
Then movies. DVDs -- it was argued, hold 5-10GB of data, so are completely impractical to pirate. The same story repeated. Compression came. You can download a 1-2GB version of a 10GB DVD with a quality good enough for 99% of the viewers -- there's much better codecs out there than the ones used on DVD.
1GB of data is like 15 minutes at full throttle even today (still with the LOWEST speed available from Lyse), even the full uncompressed DVD at 10GB or so would be downloaded in about 2 hours, which is still practical.
Now it's argued that whatever NextGen disc at 50GB or thereabouts will not be pirated because the size makes it impractical.
Give me a break. 99% of the people who listen to music find well-encoded 192kbps mp3 to be "good enough", the same people will very likely find a 1-5GB recompressed version of a blueray original "good enough" too. And they'll be able to download and store the original trivially a few years in the future anyway.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
You meant that sarcastically, but actually, you're right [arstechnica.com].
Charging more for HD content isn't going to cut it because a lot of people *with* HDTVs like the quality of DVDs in a progressive scan player (which they are are over the last couple years).
First of all, both HD-DVD and Blu-Ray movies cost the same as DVD's - about $15-$20. Some are as low as $9. So that argument doesn't hold water.
Second, nobody who has an HDTV likes the quality of DVD vs. tru
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
When was the last time someone put in the disc for Pirates of the Carribean 2 and wanted to wade through 3 minutes of "Register this disc" crap.
I have no problem buying discs or even plunking down over $25 for a disc but I don't want crap. I copy all my DVDs for
-backup protection
-convience of movie only
Re:i'm not so sure... (Score:5, Insightful)
Control of the distribution channel is far more important to the industry than any measly piracy. Why? Because they're middle men, and technology that removes the middle man means that they don't have a job anymore. DRM is about job protection, not piracy prevention.
Re:i'm not so sure... (Score:5, Insightful)
DRM is not about stopping serious copying groups... The warez scene will still rip this media and distribute it online, and dodgy street corner vendors will always have copies for sale. These people simply wouldn't watch these movies if they couldnt get free copies.
DRM is about preventing legitimate users (who are willing to pay) from doing things like format shifting. The media companies want those people who buy movies anyway, to buy additional copies to play on their ipods, portable players etc, rather than converting their existing media.
If I buy a CD, I can produce a copy for the car, i can rip it to my ipod, i can rip it onto my laptop. This is all covered by fair use in some countries. The RIAA/MPAA wants to take away our fair use rights so wring more money out of people...
If they openly admitted the purpose of DRM was to remove people's fair use rights and get more money out of legitimate buyers, there would be public outcry and they'd be taken to court. So instead, they try to claim it's to prevent organised piracy.
The constant cracking of their protection schemes just proves that it doesn't stop piracy _AT ALL_.. If preventing piracy was the true reason for DRM, they would have abandoned DRM years ago, as it's costing them a lot of money to develop while doing nothing to stop piracy.
Give it time... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Give it time... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Give it time... (Score:5, Insightful)
I hope you are proud of yourself; You're what's known as a "tightmod".
Serious Question (Score:3, Interesting)
Is this making a reference to the current crop of HD's that were purchased? Does the software phone home? Just curious. Any thoughts?
Re:Serious Question (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
(From the end of: http://news.com.com/Analyst+Corels+DRM+patch+only+ a+bandage/2100-7355_3-6 [com.com]
We fixed it properly this time... (Score:3, Interesting)
They really want this to be perceived as tight to sign up content providers.
What about the other holes? (Score:5, Informative)
How about future successes [engadget.com]?
Re:What about the other holes? (Score:5, Interesting)
Also, let me point out, I haven't read the code in its' entirety yet, but if I understand correctly, the volume key crack should actually be immune to key revokation, based on my understanding of AACS, key revokation should only effect device ids and once a method of extracting a volume ID is known, the revokation mechanism just no longer matters.
Of course, I'd also like to point out what others have already said. If a program exists that can read the data and decrypt it, then it's 100% obvious that the program can be reverse engineered. This is not an opinion, it's fact. I have on many occassions bypasses hardware dongles, FlexLM, trial periods, etc...
bypassing hardware dongles requires that you reverse engineer the driver to the dongle, this is just plain easy, all you need to do is find a disassembler that can handle the format, or if it's a kernel mode driver, then you just use a kernel mode debugger... not an issue. when you locate where the driver is being attached to from the program itself, then you just emulate the hooks. Even the most advanced dongles are easy to hack this way.
FlexLM... well... come on... this one is just so easy it's not worth talking about
Trial Periods... they can vary... depends on how obscure people want to make the code. But for the most part, they're not that hard. For example, I found a function reference in a DLL on PcAnyware (don't remember the version) called "TimeBomb()" which returned a boolean value. Not really that hard huh?
As for HD-DVD and BluRay... if all else fails, run the player (really really slow) through an emulator like QEmu and trap all IDE calls. Log the previous 1000 instructions run before the hook and then log until the first picture comes up. Then just review the log and read the source code left in the log. Hardest part is making it pretty enough to read... but if it means that much to you... well no problem.
- So... in brief... copyprotection is just a joke... laugh at it!
Re:What about the other holes? (Score:5, Insightful)
I instead of pirating and cracking, took the other road. I voted. Anything that required a hardware dongle is and always had been rejected. The new tack is using your hardware as a dongle with online activation. This is also rejected.
It is the primary reason for my move to Ubuntu instead of Vista.
It is the reason I did not accept the free upgrade to Light Factory. The upgrade removes the dependance on MS SQL server (hurrah), but also changed from a registration key (encoded with user name) to a single hardware online auth (boo hiss). I wrote the company and let them know why I moved to Freestyler instead. I am now moving to Q-Light a Linux console as part of my move from Windows.
Anybody want Lightfactory starter edition?
Vote against dongleware with your wallet. Don't pirate, use an alternative.
What do you think is more upsetting to Microsoft? Pirating MS Office or switching to Open Office? On one they can take legal action. On the other which is more offensive to them, they can do nothing.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm rooting against AACS for a simple reason: I want to buy hardware, software, and media that is 100% devoted to enabling me to do as much as possible as easily as possible. I don't
Re: (Score:2)
If you consider that the difference between SD and HD isnt that obvious to the average ordinary viewing circumstances (see the earlier article on 1080p), and if they simply display upscaled SD instead of HD content if the key is revoked, I suspect that most consumers wouldnt even notice.
Of course, as most DVDrips arent even SD quality, I'm not exactly sure how they imagine degrading to SD is going to prevent any random copy
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
This is exactly what I was hoping would happen. With the XBOX 360 HD-DVD player cracked, what are they supposed to do? Microsoft will throw their huge weight against any suggestion of revoking the player's keys. And if those keys did get revoked, I think they would have finally gone far enough to see a serious consumer backlash
The backlash will range from minor to nothing. One day you will turn on your XOBX 360 and it will said there is a new update ready for the XBOX 360. It will download and install. There are no easily available patch notes when you are in front of the machine. It will have some cool new feature in the dame update like the more informative achievement notification that is already announced. The update will change the keys. The vast majority of 360 owners will never know there was a crack nor that there
Corporate Spin (Score:2, Insightful)
Advanced Content Denial System (Score:2)
and other digital restrictions only available with Vista [badvista.org]. On second thought, I'll pass.
Thanks! (Score:2, Funny)
That sounds like a fantastic place to receive unbiased, neutral, well-researched information about a Microsoft product. Run by the FSF, no less! WOW!!
Re: (Score:2)
I also love how you quote a competing operating system's propaganda site as a 'reliable source'. You're getting sloppy, Twitter.
Re: (Score:2)
"Fixed Flaws"? (Score:5, Insightful)
The flaws aren't fixed. They're just papered over slightly more aggressively. Don't worry, there'll be more flaws.
Re: (Score:2)
How does that work for the people that purchased media that
used the keys which are now expired....
Re: (Score:2)
The real issue is people who purchased [i]players[/i] which used the keys which are now expired. Those people must update their players. In the case of WinDVD, that means downloading an update. In the case of the XBox360 drive that will involve downloading an update. (The XBox360 key is not yet revoked, and in theory they might not revoke it.)
Re: (Score:2)
Until they purchase a new player and expect to play the old
media on it....
Re:"Fixed Flaws"? (Score:5, Informative)
When they revoke keys, they simply remove the old compromised keys from new discs, so players relying on those keys can't play anything.
Re:"Fixed Flaws"? (Score:4, Insightful)
You learn something old every day. Well, I do anyway.
Re:"Fixed Flaws"? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
If I'm interpreting http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=122363 [doom9.org] correctly, there would be 2^22 or 4 million possible keys available. I honestly don't see them running out anytime soon. On top of that, the AACS encryption could be extended pretty much indefinitely, and if the actual implementation is cleverly done, it may be possible to extend it without breaking any hardware players (at least, any pl
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
If so, I imagine less technical users of those discs & players will be extremely annoyed. Think of all the HDTVs that can't pick up hi-def signals because the standards changed. This'll feel like that again.
Re: (Score:2)
Summary, though: a disc can be decrypted by an entire set of keys (I don't know the actual count, but I suspect it's at least thousands) and they can be revoked one at a time on a disc-by-disc basis. They won't be adding new keys (since that creates the exact problem you've described), they'll just be revoking old compromised keys, and presumably they have enough keys ready that they don't believe they will run out.
security breech (Score:5, Funny)
Is that like a chastity belt? Or maybe an adult diaper?
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Even more reason to have nothing to do with it (Score:5, Interesting)
"New high-def DVDs will include updated keys and instructions for older versions of the PC-playback software not to play discs until the software patch has been installed."
No one gives my computer instructions but me. So I will have nothing to do with either of these formats at all. I am just gonna say no and take my business elsewhere.
DVD is quite fine, and where it doesn't then there are hard drives. Hollywood can give me movies in a format I'll accept or they can e2fsck off.
Re:Even more reason to have nothing to do with it (Score:5, Insightful)
Yeah see this is what always gets me about the DRM thing. Either you make it playable or you make it secure. Pick one.
The Sony rootkit fiasco really brought home, for me, the need of consumers to assert their rights over their devices. This computer on which I'm writing this is mine. If I had the choice of hardware that would do what I told it or hardware that would obey the whims of the MPAA/RIAA, I'd choose the open hardware. Given the choice of software that does what I tell it to or software that doesn't, the choice is obvious. If there is no choice, I write my own software.
The most insulting thing about the rootkit incident, as well as many such events since, is the notion that just because I'm using my computer to play content owned by someone else they somehow they own my hardware. That's simply not the case.
Here's what I want to know. They're sending a patch to the software that plays the discs, right? It's already too late to change what's on the actual discs because too many are already in the wild, so to speak. What if I just don't update my software/firmware? Or better yet, what if I write my own?
Re: (Score:2)
What would be fun is if somehow all keys were exposed. What would they do then? It'd be CSS all over again.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Even more reason to have nothing to do with it (Score:5, Insightful)
And as the price of Pro HDTV cameras and computers + digital editing S/W drop, you will be able to do a pretty decent all digital-straight to video for a lot less. Sure, you'll still have substantial costs for lighting equipment, audio equipment, makeup, getting filming permits, and so on. But you won't necessarily need to spend money on film and film processing. That's going to open the door to a lot more student and amateur film-making efforts. And yeah, it will still meet Sturgeon's Law, but there *will* be a lot more good stuff mixed in the avalanche of garbage that will fill sites like YouTube.
Re:Even more reason to have nothing to do with it (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Even more reason to have nothing to do with it (Score:5, Insightful)
Indeed.
Look at Infernal Affairs - the original from which "The Departed" was remade - done in Hong Kong it had a budget of roughly 5M USD at the time. The Departed had a budget of roughly $90M and that does not take into account advertising. That's almost a 20:1 ratio and many people argue that "Infernal Affairs" is still the better movie.
Look at "Il Mare (Siworae)" - the original from which the recent Keanu Reeves/Sandra Bullock "The Lake House" was remade - a budget of under 2M USD versus roughly $40M for the remake and if IMDB's ratings are anything to go by, the original was better. Again a 20:1 ratio.
Furthermore, South Korea regularly turns out top caliber movies and yet the most expensive film they've produced, The Host, [wikipedia.org] had a budget of $10M. Most South Korean productions are well under half of that, often closer to $2M, and their quality easily surpasses most of what Hollywood does.
South Korea is one of the few markets in the world where local productions regularly beat out Hollywood for ticket sales (in part because of screen quotas, but that changed recently due to the US State Department doing the MAFIAA's biding and it still didn't put a dent in local cinema). These movies focus on story rather than flash, so there are less special effects. But otherwise the movies look just as good as anything from Hollywood - professionally lit, professional wardrobe, make-up, cinematography, and of course the most important part -- great story telling.
While production costs are cheaper in South Korea and Hong Kong than they are in Hollywood, they are not necessarily less than for a lot of "run aways" where Hollywood outsources various parts of the production to cheaper parts of the world.
So, yes it is easily possible to outdo Hollywood and even produce 'blockbuster quality' (if quality is the right term) movies for far far less than Hollywood does right now.
Re: (Score:2)
Most contracts require the band to pay for the videos. Good huh?
The right to pirate (Score:3, Insightful)
Because we can. Forget about laws in books, even forget that Bill Of Rights that some of you have, they get ignored all the time. Rights are yours if you have the means to enforce your ability to exercise your right.
What about the lazy customer? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Christ, It's not entirely difficult for someone that isn't phased by technology, but I know if I've kicked on my couch on a friday night with a beer, the last bloody thing I want to be doing is getting up, searching for my model of "insert new format player here" d
Respin (Score:5, Insightful)
No no no. Let's just tidy that baby up a bit:
"Makers of software for playing the discs on computers are requiring consumers to download patches that will re-apply the product defects that computing professionals had removed in the weeks prior. Despite the fact that nothing is technically wrong with the older versions of the software, it is being intentionally rendered obsolete to force the update -- no new movies will be viewable on the old software."
Schwab
AACS == Barn - Horse (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
The hackers only figured out how to get the old key. This is a new key. The hackers don't have the new key.
What are you, stupid?
Re: (Score:2)
They didn't fix anything (Score:5, Insightful)
What they have done is analogous to re-keying a lock that is susceptible to being picked -- it's only a matter of time before it is picked again. Lather, rinse, repeat. And how long before a hardware player is cracked? If I had one I'd bust into it to see what kind of flash it has. It probably has an on-board JTAG or other programming port to dump the memory like most consumer devices which are mass produced and then flashed assembly style, making obtaining the key quite easy. When the players come down in price I fully expect them to be cracked on a daily basis.
analogous ? (Score:5, Funny)
I'm sorry, but this is /. and we only allow automotive analogies here. Please rephrase.
Re: (Score:2)
Uh, yesterday [slashdot.org]. It's not small beans either: It's the XBOX 360.
Re:They didn't fix anything (Score:5, Interesting)
So not only was AACS not really fixed (Just the key revoked) the velocity of revocation process is slower than the hacking process. And this revocation was a key for a software package, I imagine that the process for revoking the key for a hardware device, like the external Xbox360 HD-DVD drive to be slower, a lot slower.
Also given the nature of this sort of thing, I also figure pretty soon there will be increased interest in hacking a stand alone HD or BD player... as the price comes down I'm sure the allure of forcing revocation of a series of hardware players will attract attention.
I know I'd sure like to do it, if only to annoy and embarrass the AACS group.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
It doesn't work like that. Or at least it isn't supposed to work like that.
The AACS scheme has the ability to revoke individual players - not individual models, but actual single units. They use a lot of fancy set theory to do it, but in ess
breech? (Score:3, Funny)
Sharp edges. Ouch.
The game continues (Score:4, Insightful)
It amazes me that so many people believe that they can do the DRM game and make huge money. Recent news tells me that if the US government is trying to influence other countries to do more about copyright infringement, well then, DRM must not work worth a damn, otherwise there would be no need for US Governmental intervention. With that bit of proof that it won't work, doesn't work, and can't work, it should be relatively obvious to all concerned that the only way that DRM *CAN* work is if governments create laws that make it illegal to not use DRM.
Media and content providers simply have to get on the right bandwagon... DRM isn't it. No matter what fantastically great work they do for any particular DRM scheme it will always end up broken. There is no method that can reasonably ensure secure keys when the unencrypted content has to be present to view it. Sigh, old dogs, new tricks, bad circus experiences....
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, cos copyright law is already so well followed by the populace, I'm sure they'd be all broken up about breaking another law enforcing the use of DRM. Other than that, good post.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
DRM can never prevent piracy, sufficiently knowledgeable people will always be able to crack any DRM scheme. It's not like normal encryption where the key is unknown, your player needs to have the key in order to play the media, so it's simply a matter of extracting the key from whatever obfuscation scheme is being used to hide it, rather than having to crack the encryption itself.
DRM is to prevent fair use, the people who buy legitimate media and exercise their fair use rig
Lesson (Score:2)
Thanks for listening.
Re: (Score:2)
If hackers wait until AACS is as ubiquitous as CSS is today before announcing a crack, then AACS will be a success. It needs to be cracked as soon as possible and as often as possible to show that DRM doesn't work.
No, no, no. (Score:5, Insightful)
The benefit of all these cracks isn't to allow people to copy the movies. That ability was never in doubt -- people will always be able to do that. They'll be able to do that regardless of what the content monopolies do, short of just deciding that they won't release movies anymore (which is fine; there's enough of a demand for entertainment that other people will do it -- there's nothing special about making movies that a lot of people can't do, it just takes a lot of money).
Holding onto a crack until AACS is ubiquitous wouldn't do anything. The ultimate failure of AACS isn't, and never was, in doubt -- all DRM is flawed, and it will eventually be broken.
The question is whether it's possible to convince both the studios/content-creators, and consumers, of the utter futility of DRM in the first place, so they'll stop trying to do it, and stop wasting everyone's time. DRM is nothing but a broken window: it's millions of man-hours and probably billions of dollars of resources diverted from other, more productive, tasks, both to create it and break it. That's the real cost of DRM.
So if by releasing cracks for AACS every time they update it, as quickly as possible, it demonstrates to the studios that they're engaging in a war against a guerrilla enemy that they can't possibly defeat, regardless of how much money they spend, perhaps they'll throw in the towel sooner rather than later. It may be a slim chance, but given that Apple has started to see the light, there's some hope.
That's the real benefit of these cracks. Compared to the economic and social cost of the wasted effort, the ability of people to pirate a few movies pales in comparison.
They don't get it - DRM is suicice (Score:3, Interesting)
The number one reason Vista is Sinking Like a Stone [dailytechnobabble.com], is "DRM problems and lack of anything even remotely demonstrating an understanding of how users want to use digital media." If DVD makers tighten up, people are going to route around them the same way they are routing around the RIAA member companies. They will flock to independent film makers and the big dumb publishers will watch their earnings collapse at 20% per year. Their greed goes beyond the already insane limits of copyright and that kind of thing is simply not fun.
Re: (Score:2)
Final Solution (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
--
I know I'm getting offtopic here, but I personally know some people who are rich, own copyrighted content, and are absolutely obsessed with controlling it. They're not people I can understand. They think that every reasonable fair use right should be carefully meted out by themselves alone, that they should be able to revoke rights to anyone at any time for any reason, that allowing a user to copy
Already hacked via Xbox 360 add on VID (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.xboxhacker.net/index.php?topic=6866.0 [xboxhacker.net]
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?&t=124294&p
http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/10/aacs-hacked-to
It's all a big scam (Score:2)
That's right, the people that payed Intervideo for their player that was advertised to play DVD-Audio are TOL. Intervideo pulled the functionality out of their new players and the people that had bought the older version are only going to be able to playback DVD-Audio discs that were mastered pre-revoked keys. Unless they upgrade, in which case they can't play any DVD-Audio.
I'm just s
how do you think the new patch adresses the issue? (Score:5, Interesting)
If you were the implementer of AACS on HD player SW, how would you hide the key? I can think of a few ways:
1. Keep the data in CPU registers and cache.
2. Split the keys up into smaller pieces, and spread them around when in memory.
It seems that both is basically security through obscurity, and that has not worked very well in the future.
If you respond to this with a clever way to do this, make sure you post the reason it will not stand up to hackers as well. Otherwise, keep it to yourself
Re:how do you think the new patch adresses the iss (Score:5, Funny)
Ahh, I see you have already attended the time travel seminar that will be held in two weeks.
Re:how do you think the new patch adresses the iss (Score:4, Funny)
So tell me.. was Duke Nukem Forever worth the wait?
Hooray! (Score:5, Funny)
Subject (Score:3, Interesting)
They're going to have to institute an MS-like "patch Tuesday" to issue new keys.
On the down side, I'm going to have to wait until the weekend before the HDDVD hackers break the new scheme and resume their regular distribution schedule.
Comment removed (Score:3, Interesting)
Reading between the lines of this press release: (Score:3, Insightful)
No, seriously, we did... Really.
So, unless some miscreant goes out and breaks something, yes, it is fixed.
Hackers of the world: It ain't broke, so please don't be taking it apart to find out why. Please! The fact that you can't watch movies you paid for on the equipment you own is a design feature. Please don't meddle with it, it will only make more work for us.
{We have just raised the bar and thrown down the gauntlet, so: On your mark, get set, GO!}
CDs aren't a new format! (Score:4, Insightful)
True Audio CDs have no DRM. New "CDs" that have no DVDs hidden on them should have no DRM, since no one is making pure "CD" DRM anymore. If you buy CDs from non-RIAA labels, you should never run into DRM at all.
Now, DVDs do have DRM. So the question is, how do we get manufacturers to make Laserdiscs again?
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
I firmly believe that the demise of the Vinyl LP was orchestrated by the recording industry, in order to get consumers used to 'digital technolog
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.riaaradar.com/search.asp [riaaradar.com]
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
That led me to think they had to use a revocation list scheme like CA's use. Because without it if , say, Bob's electronics decide to manufacture it's own drive then any HD content made BEFORE it was issued it's key wouldn't play on it. That would be a HUGE barrier t