Evidence of Historical Zombie Attack at Hierakonpolis 244
sertsa writes "A tongue-in-cheek article just published by the Archaeological Institute of America hypothesizes that the formation of ancient Egypt is linked to recurrent Predynastic zombie attacks due to outbreaks of Solanum virus. 'From the very beginning of Predynastic research, Sir W.M. Flinders Petrie reported several headless, but seemingly intact, burials during his famous excavations at Naqada in 1895. Further excavations at Gerzeh and other sites revealed more of these curious burials, but no satisfactory explanation could be proposed at the time. More recently, excavations in the non-elite cemetery at Hierakonpolis (HK43), undertaken from 1996 to 2004, have uncovered more of these strange headless burials in addition to 21 individuals whose cervical vertebrae bear cut marks indicative of complete decapitation. The individuals include men and women ranging in age from 16 to 65. The number and the standard position of the cut marks (usually on the second-fourth cervical vertebrae; always from the front) indicate an effort far greater than that needed simply to cause the death of a normal (uninfected) person. The standard position also indicates these are not injuries sustained during normal warfare.'"
Everyone knows it was not zombie attacks (Score:4, Funny)
Everyone with an ounce of scientific training can tell that these were actually attacks by ninja pirates, and that the vampire zombies were defending the inhabitants.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Everyone knows it was not zombie attacks (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Making them agree to the proposition might be difficult, unless the Ninja is a hot kunoichi and the pirate is played by Johnny Depp...
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, zombies are real! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
reminds me of..... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:reminds me of..... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:reminds me of..... (Score:4, Insightful)
I'm not religious, but am not bothered by people who are.
But creationists annoy the living shit out of me because of the tortured "logic" they try to use while attempting to justify their belief that the earth is only 6000 years old.
Young earth (Score:5, Informative)
The young earth theory isn't even classic Christianity [entouch.net], having become popular in the US in the 18th century. The church fathers had a variety of theories, and literally counting the years was a 17th century invention [wikipedia.org]. Augustine noted that time as we know it is itself part of this creation, and therefore the 6 days in Genesis 1 could not refer to time in this universe. He speculated that the 6 days were a 6 day "seminar" where the new creation was was presented and explained to the angels [rtforum.org].
Re:Young earth (Score:5, Funny)
We're the result of a 6 day Powerpoint presentation??!?
That sure explains a few things...
Re:Young earth (Score:5, Funny)
I mean, look at it. First day, light and darkness, works fine. Reason? Angels were fresh and actually listening.
And from there on it went downhill, right to the 6th day with human. Now tell me, can you sit through 6 days of a boring presentation? I'm fairly sure by the end of the 5th day, every Angel was just sitting there doodling.
Re:Young earth (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
So many obfuscated laws...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
WALLA! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I thought the always ended with the bullet point: "have fun"
Re:Young earth (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
How does their argument go?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If you really want tortured logic, you should see the Unified Theory of Existence [iastate.edu] - it proves that creationism, intelligent design and evolution are only pieces of the puzzle. The truth is much bigger.
Re:huh? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
The single largest cause of
Re: (Score:2)
Stalin kept referring to how "the wheel of history" was on his side, with as little evidence as anyone who claims that God is on their side.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Them bones don' be movin'.
Mebbe some more tequilya.
Re:reminds me of..... (Score:5, Funny)
That's ludicrous! There's plenty of factual evidence that shows the evolutions of hominid skeleton evolution [berkeley.edu] into human skeleton. Curiously they seem to have inhabited the same places that hominid and humans, but there's not yet enough scientific evidence to prove this theory.
Re:reminds me of..... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:reminds me of..... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
PLEASE! (Score:2)
Also, no inside jokes from scientists. After Gary Larson, none of that is allowed anymore.
Mod me as you like!
hmm (Score:5, Funny)
Re:hmm (Score:5, Funny)
Anyone with half a brain, well...
is probably being attacked by a zombie.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
I mean, normal people don't talk like that.
Eh??? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
As a civil servant, I'm supposed to be doing nothing! just ask anybody.
Yes I know someone will point out I'm on slashdot, but I do get a lunch period.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Ghosts work because only sentient creatures will have the 'unfinished business' to keep them here.
Zombies? Well, how do you know there aren't lots of cockroach zombies? It takes all sorts of crap to kill them, maybe they're just already dead?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That's not ectoplasm on your walls...
Re: (Score:2)
The people in electronics don't know the difference between a USB mouse and a PS/2 mouse. They don't know the difference between a fullscreen and a widescreen DVD (which it seems Wal-mart is the only backwards store still carrying mostly fullscreen). They don't know the difference between an Xbox and an Xbox 360. The guys in the sporting goods don't know the difference between a baitcast and a spin
Proof? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
*That*, incidentally, is surely going to be one hell of an expensive film. Most zombie movies are pretty cheap to make, but World War Z is basically an entire future history made up of awesomely expensive-to-make sequences. I won't give too much away in case there are some /.ers who haven't read the book!
Lurch post (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Preceding the zombie attacks (Score:2, Funny)
French Revolution (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
I for one . . . (Score:2, Funny)
Huh?... (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Hey, it's plausible.
TFA is hilarious (Score:5, Informative)
"While it is an attractive idea, no serious archaeologist would hang their fedora on it without further evidence." Sure; every serious archaeologist wears an Indiana Jones hat, goes without saying.
"Overall, those with cut marks represent less than 4% of the cemetery's population. Thus, one might suggest that the threat of zombification was relatively low, and those manifesting the disease were dealt with swiftly (though in some cemeteries evidence for cannibalism has also been found suggesting that one or two got a good meal first)." It goes on to suggest that the need for swift anti-zombie action may have led to the early invention of government by kings.
If zombies re-emerge as a threat in modern times: "Almost certainly the first sign of infection will come from the Hierakonpolis team. [...] The unfortunate side effect of the infection starting within this specialized group of researchers is that they are generally the least squeamish about decapitation duty. I know for a fact that Sean Dougherty, a physical anthropologist with extensive experience at the site, wouldn't hesitate to lop off the head of any member of the team at any time, and for any reason."
Go read it!
http://www.archaeology.org/online/features/hierakonpolis/zombies.html [archaeology.org]
steveha
Missing brainzzz... (Score:3, Funny)
Oi! I'm not a virus!! (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
In fact it is ironic so long as you don't accept the notion that all anti-gay Republicans are in fact gay. Now...it is less ironic now than it was originally because 2 more Republicans have gotten busted soliciting gay sex in the last 2 months or so. So you could argue that the outcome of events IS what is expected now. Either way it is still damned funny that each one of the clowns voted to make discriminating against gays A-OK
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:I read this in the Zombie Survival Handbook (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:I read this in the Zombie Survival Handbook (Score:4, Insightful)
In the name of our zombie brethern I resent them being lumped together with the bunch that currently runs the US! They already got so much bad press, they really don't deserve that.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:What's the deal with this? (Score:5, Funny)
October, Halloween. Even archaeologists have a sense of humor. Get one today!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
B) There have been several Zombie books of some geek notoriety
C) (this one might be hard for you to grasp) some people where just having a good time and being a little silly. It's almost like there was some event that involved monsters and zombie around this time of year.
Re: (Score:2)
With a handle such as "necro2607," you must be one of the undead insulted by this fiction about your heredity.
Zombies are all around us. I see them all the time working at the local movie theaters taking tickets, making telemarketing calls about vitamin supplements, or even working diligently in bureaucratic jobs (such as secretaries in college financial-aid offices).
Be dead! Be proud!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You're prolly knee-deep in the juju swapping war stories with the Dru Naju.
Re: (Score:2)
It might be kind of obscure, but "solanum" is a reference to the fictional Solanum virus in the Zombie Survival Guide [wikipedia.org] by Max Brooks. It's also alluded to, but I don't think is explicitly named, in the quasi-sequel World War Z [wikipedia.org]. Both are awesome books, btw, and I highly recommend reading them.
Limits of Scientific Humor (Score:2)
I would like to offer the proposition that scientific humor is targeted for a limited audience and that the form of the publication often parodies that of field-appropriate journals. This later point often makes the joke difficult to translate. It's like having a punchline in a monologue where the timing is badly off. Other elements often depend on an understanding of subtle word play or field specific terminology. This is not to say that scientific humor cannot be understood by non-scientists, but mere
Re: (Score:2)
Three additional quick comments.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Doesn't it seem strange that the only guy bashing the articles goes by the name necro2607? Methinks he must be part of the zombie cover-up conspiracy, trying to keep their plans a secret while they raise their unholy army of the dead to conquer the world.
Re:What's the deal with this? (Score:5, Funny)
No, it's not a joke. It's 100% serious. That's why it was posted under the category "It's funny. Laugh." and the first few words of the summary are "A tongue-in-cheek article".
That's the sign of a dead-serious story right there.
Re: (Score:2)
Everything is it's Opposite.. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
OK, then look at the choice quotes of a poster just below:
http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=354929&cid=21289339 [slashdot.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Somehow I doubt the Archaeological Institute of America is too worried about their acreddidation with you.
Re: (Score:2)
Lots of boogymen have historical/medical roots (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)