A Really, Really Ex-Parrot 91
gyrogeerloose writes "According to a National Geographic News story, what may be the fossilized wing bone of an ancient parrot has been dubbed by its discoverers 'The Danish Blue' in honor of the famous Dead Parrot Sketch. If the 54 million year old bone did in fact belong to a parrot, it would be 'the oldest and most northerly remains of a parrot ever discovered.' There is some dispute among paleontologists about whether the bone was indeed that of a parrot. If it turns out to be so, however, it never had a chance to pine for the fjords — they were not carved out until an ice age millions of years after the bird lived."
Berift of life, it rested in peace (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
jewelry Re:Berift of life, it rested in peace (Score:2)
I just find it creepy. Even if I know what parrot tastes like.
http://www.klimt02.net/jewellers/index.php?item_id=5860 [klimt02.net]
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I blogged it and am getting responses of appreciation for some of the artists work.
I meet the craziest peoples.
Re: (Score:2)
I went to the artists website.
http://www.discemori.com/ [discemori.com]
She has a kitten rug.
Re: (Score:2)
What does parrot taste like? I've often fantasized about cooking up our Amazon Yellowhead...
Re: (Score:2)
It tastes like chicken.
You knew that was coming.
It really tastes like pigeon. ;)
Which kind tastes like quail, the bird not the polytick.
Which reminds me I'm hungry again.
So I'm having....chicken.
At least it'll be a curry and not fried.
Re: Danish Blue (Score:5, Informative)
Re: Danish Blue (Score:5, Insightful)
Misquoting Monty Python is a time-honored tradition in geekdom. After all, if they got it right what would Slashdot readers post about?
Right, that does it. (Score:5, Funny)
*tears off black t-shirt from Thinkgeek, revealing a plaid shirt underneath*
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Oh so now you're a lumberjack? I guess that's ok.
Re:Right, that does it. (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Right, that does it. (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
What about driving a Mitsubishi Warrior?
Nothing says, "I'm a lumberjack and I'm OK" quite like driving a shiny Mitsubishi Warrior around town. And remember those adverts on TV?
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed. Then he can tell us all about how he likes traffic lights.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Excuse me, is this the right room for the cheese shop sketch?
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
No, the cheese shop is in 12a, this is abuse
...
Stupid git!
Re: (Score:2)
Intentional or pure fluke? Python did do a lot I guess
Re: (Score:1)
Danish fjords (Score:2)
Re:Danish fjords (Score:5, Funny)
I once rented a Fjord Fjocus.
Re:Danish fjords (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
While you all keep quoting and mis-quoting Monty Python, I found a weird Douglas Adams reference [photobucket.com].
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Danish fjords (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Nope. It was discovered in Denmark, not Norway. While the "[Scandanavian Country*] Blue" name may have inspired by Monty Python, it was not copied from Monty Python.
*Yes, Denmark is in Scandanavia, in spite of what some people think.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Beautiful plumage.
Re: (Score:1)
Obligatory (Score:5, Funny)
Even Better... (Score:4, Funny)
The particular fossil they found was of the "Humerus" bone.
*rimshot*
Thank you, I'll be here all week. Try the veal!
I'm no expert (Score:1)
But... "The fossil-a large wing bone called the humerus"... could it not be just as likely that it was simply a mutated form of a known parrot that was around at that time (of which the time is hard to define) and possibly died because of said deformaties? not exactly a new species.
Also, is it not possible that this bird was caged in some Captains quarters of a ship, and this was deformed because of that? Or even not a parrot at all?
Considering this is a solitary bone, I wouldnt be handing out any awards be
Those pirates 54 million years ago (Score:4, Funny)
...were vicious with their domesticated parrots.
Re: (Score:2)
lol... whoops, I was off on a tangent thinking about ways it could have been deformed, and completely neglected the actual proposed age of the bone, just lumped "old" as in... I dunno, anything before steam locomotives apparently.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Well, keep in mind that there were no navies 54 million years ago, so it stands to reason that, having the run of the seas, pirates would be quite prolific.
Re: (Score:2)
Good point. On the other hand, the lack of fjords suggests that they may have needed greater endurance than later navies since safe harbors may have been more scarce.
Re: (Score:2)
But what would they need safe harbor from? With their only natural predator not to arrive for fifty-three million, nine hundred ninety-seven thousand three hundred seventeen years?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:I'm no expert (Score:4, Informative)
Exactly which part of "the oldest and most northerly remains of a parrot ever discovered" translates to you into "a known parrot that was around at that time"? No, seriously.
Dude, let's put it like this:
- this thing is 54 _million_ years old
- humans, as in Homo Sapiens, are about 200,000 years old
- even Neanderthals, the only other species that ever reached sentience, isn't that horribly much older. The proto-neanderthals reached Europe some 350-500 thousand years ago, but the fully evolved Neanderthals are a mere 130,000 years old.
- the split between the ancestors of humans and chimpanzees happened some 6 million years ago. Which is to say that at that point, the most evolved form of life was something that was dumber and more primitive than the chimp. It's _not_ something that would build ships and sail the fjords.
So exactly what species would that captain be, 54 million years ago. Are we talking some time-travelling alien that took a different species of parrot from a later time, and then went back to 54 million years ago to dump its skeleton there and confuse a species that didn't even exist yet? Or what?
Heh.
Re: (Score:2)
Golgafrinchan? Unless he wasn't spending a lot of time in the bath tub...
Re: (Score:2)
Cripes they must all have been so rich with the trees gone.
Re: (Score:2)
Now now, I wasn't talking about Bush this time ;)
Re:I'm no expert (Score:4, Insightful)
Off topic, but when you have elephants that recognise themselves in the mirror [livescience.com], apes that can plan tool usage ahead of time [sciam.com], parrots that grasp the concept of zero [alexfoundation.org], and so on, I'm personally honestly no longer convinced claims like this can be made so easily.
Intelligent design response. (Score:5, Funny)
I discovered the only reason that it appears to be 54 million years old in the first place was that God had NAILED it there.
Re: (Score:2)
And parrots would have then evolved to become the dominant species on earth.
Re: (Score:2)
I discovered the only reason that it appears to be 54 million years old in the first place was that God had NAILED it there.
Except "He" only did it 6000 years ago but messed around with radioactive decay to make us think it was 54 million years ago, because everyone knows that "God" is the Ultimate Practical Joker.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I thought "God" was just a device created to prove a point about the silliness of teaching Flying Spaghetti Monsterism at schools in Kansas. Or have I gotten them back to front again?
Re: (Score:2)
Well after all, Peanut butter [youtube.com] disproved evolution a while ago.
Re: (Score:2)
Ohh! That's really good.
Props to a funny joke.
Yaaaaaaaawn (Score:5, Funny)
Man do I need to remember to set the alarm clock...
Polly is a pain to take care of (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
My wife's parents owned two cockatoos (unfortunately, one passed away a few years back, so it is down to one now). When both birds were in the midst of a screech-fest and the phone rang, my father-in-law would answer it "Hello, Jurassic Park!"
BTW, the current theory is that the chicken is the closest living relative of the T-Rex: http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2007/apr/13/uknews.taxonomy [guardian.co.uk]
Imagine the drumsticks you could have eaten back in the Cretaceous! That is, if they didn't eat you first.
So whenever a T-Rex are something new... (Score:3, Funny)
He would remark, "Tastes like me"?
Re: (Score:2)
C'mon, Ug, everything taste like T-rex. Everyone know that. Even Ig know that, and Ig stupid as monolith.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, we have an Amazon Yellowhead. Little bastard may not have the stature of a T-Rex but he has the attitude of one for sure
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah. African greys.
The smarts of a five year old kid, and the attitude of a three year old kid. For sixty years.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I heard they can grow out of it though. Apparently this requires a companion of the same species and appropriate gender... so it's a coin toss really unless the birds are sexed from a blood sample or something. Screeching from absence of people sounds like a spoiled brat though.
It's weird in a way, because compared to budgies african greys seem very slow and calm, even docile. Yet the budgie doesn't throw a tantrum or act like a princess. (they do bite to get a reaction though.) Perhaps it's about ways of e
54 Million years (Score:2, Funny)
What do you mean I can't return it?? A warranty that doesn't last at least 55 million years isn't worth the paper it's written on!
- RG>
In other news ... (Score:2)
... the archeoligists who discovered the parrot sceleton described its plumage as 'lovely'.
Where was Scandinavia 54 million years ago (Score:1)
Fjords (Score:2)
Wouldn't there have been fjords resulting from previous glaciations? It's not as if they're unique to the last one.
I think it's safe to say.. (Score:1)