Slashdot's Disagree Mail 100
The less we talk about this first guy, the better. Let's just hope that he found love and a treadmill someplace.
On Mon Aug 25, 2003 ******** wrote:
"Hello, I am a 'generously proportioned' male (375 pounds) with a less than generous penile length (4 inches erect). I seek a vendor of quality inflatable sheep who can give away free samples as I am unemployed. Best regards."
I'm not really sure what this message means. I didn't get the cryptic first mail that he talks about, but it sounds important.
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 ******* wrote:
"Be well advised that my last email contains information about the persons that this script was, in fact, not written for. this section contains authorizations as to ensure that authorizations would work. Also be advised that the infromation therein is no longer valid."
The last two are both from people who obviously used the wrong address. I can assure you that I never accused the second guy of any sexual impropriety.
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 ******** wrote:
"hi, i look for south america road atlas. can be each country or two \ three countries combination gather in one. can you addvice or help me? thanks ahead."
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 ******** wrote:
"Seeing as you accused me of having child pornography AND I DIDN'T and you accused my of ATTEMPTING TO RAPE YOU and I didn't I thought it best that I didn't have any contact with you. You are a disturbed person. Do not contact me. Thank you."
Illin in the panicillin? (Score:2, Insightful)
Is she illin in the panicillin?
Is she chillin in the panicillin?
Is she stealin in the panicillin?
Is she feelin in the panicillin?
Panka panka
Is she liable no suitifiable pliable style is so suitifiable
Is she liable no suitifiable im not on trial but its suitifiable
Is she reliable no suitifiable not just viable but real suitifiable
Is she try-able no suitifiable lying in the aisle im real suitifiable
Is she spillin in the panicillin?
Is she squealin in the panicillin?
Is she feelin in the panicillin?
Is she trilli
Yeah, this is silly. (Score:5, Insightful)
Most of the other "Disagree Mail" actually was about Slashdot, as opposed to being totally unrelated. Yes, you got four emails, but note, they don't even talk about Slashdot or the web. I don't know why you posted these ones.
(What's this crap doing on the front page? I know that I can go into my settings and turn it off, but I'm lazy! This shouldn't be on the front page at all! Even if I'm a lazy bum. Shut up! I hate you!)
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Yeah, this is silly. (Score:5, Funny)
Non-sequitors, false accusations, pointless drivel, and complete misunderstandings. How do you not see how this is related to Slashdot.
Your inflatable sheep is in the post.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Because there was no MS bashing, duh!
Re: (Score:1)
Your inflatable MS sheep is in the post.
Re: (Score:2)
You need to read between the lines, clearly the generously proportioned man was Steve Ballmer.
Re:Yeah, this is silly. (Score:5, Funny)
Well, I hear Vista includes drivers for the aforementioned inflatable sheep. But if you weigh over 300 lbs, they crash after the sheep downloads child pornography and then proceeds to rape you.
This error is known as the Bahhhh Sheep of Death.
Re:Yeah, this is silly. (Score:5, Funny)
"Be well advised that my last email contains information about the persons that this script was, in fact, not written for. this section contains authorizations as to ensure that authorizations would work. Also be advised that the infromation therein is no longer valid."
I dunno, I think that was a direct reference to the Microsoft Windows XP EULA.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Your inflatable sheep is in the post.
Q: Why is it sheep and never horses?
A: Because a horse will say "neigh!"
Is it time for my lithium already, Doctor?
AS much as I enjoy /. mail (Score:2)
I ahve to agree with you on these.
If there just going to be random unfunny unrelated in anyway emails I'm not interested, I could just read my spam.
Re:Yeah, this is silly. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
"Most of my other "Disagree Mail" actually was about Slashdot, as opposed to being totally unrelated. Yes, I sent four emails, but note, they don't even talk about Slashdot or the web. I don't know why I sent these ones.
"(What's my mail doing on the "Disagree Mail"? I know that I can go into my hole and tune you out, but I'm lazy! This shouldn't be on the "Disagree Mail" at all! Even if I'm a lazy bum. Shut up! I hate you!)"
// There, fixed that for ya.
Re:Yeah, this is silly. (Score:4, Insightful)
You can turn it off the front page, but NOT off the RSS feed. So it's still possible to be inflicted by the Idle crap by accident.
Taco, if you MUST persist with Idle (in the face of mostly displeasure) can you not have it as a totally separate site? It's only fair isn't it? Those who don't want this crap need never see it, and the cast-offs from Digg can go to the new Idle site any time they want. Is this not fair?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
This batch of disagree mail proves that people are now writing ridiculous emails just to get into disagree mail. Kind of like people used to shoot for the red zone in the DFC. Anyone here remember the DFC?
Re: (Score:2)
If so, then I want these peoples' crystal balls. The only Disagree Mail above that was written this year was written back in August. (All of them were written in August, but two of them were in August 2005, and one was August 2003. Only one was August 2008.)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't particularly care if it's on the front page, I just don't like it mucking up my RSS feed.
Re: (Score:1)
Dear /. (Score:4, Funny)
oh, BTW, where are my inflatable sheep?
Plural (Score:5, Funny)
I notice you use the plural - you want more than one? What do you plan on doing with them, flock them?
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
My guess is its his way of saying "Flock ewe!" to slashdot...
Re: (Score:1)
Now im just waiting on my inflatable collie with its free jar of peanut butter
Re: (Score:2)
Well, you need atleast two so one of them can get jealous. Once you have a flock the possibilities really open up. Think about it.
Re: (Score:1)
Please, read what you write before you post it (Score:5, Insightful)
How is this crap getting posted to a landmark site of the tech industry? We might be able to put up with news making it to Slashdot three days after everywhere else, but these posts are abysmal.
Re:Please, read what you write before you post it (Score:5, Insightful)
I tried Digg for awhile, but the comments system is crap. I have never peaked at Slashcode, but IMNSHO, the Slashdot comments system is much better. I like it better than Fark and K5, too, though K5 is a close second.
My other big complaint about Digg is I hate all the pap that's always on the front page. At least with Fark, you're GOING for the funny. I don't visit Slashdot for funny. I visit it for interesting tech and science news stories that have been culled down from a great many. I also visit it because real scientists post things on Slashdot.
I can find more specialized content in a variety of blogs, but /. has a mix of things that I am interested in, with a great comments system, and that's why I come back.
Seriously, though, idle IS pants.
-l
Re: (Score:1)
"I tried Digg for awhile, but the comments system is crap. I have never peaked at Slashcode,"
Peak? You think Slashcode is the peak? The peak of what? The peak of programming excellence?
Methinks you meant "peeked". Sorry for the spelling flame, can't help it...
Re: (Score:2)
Your correction is incorrect because you are alleging I used the wrong word, which is false. The problem is I misspelled the correct word. I suggest brushing up on your usage rules. ;)
The Firefox spellchecker doesn't fix all, does it? Peek/peak is not a distinction I am accustomed to making -- certainly not one of my spelling/grammar pet peeves -- despite being a decent speller for the most part. I can't even remember the last time I typed either one... checking my email, it looks like Jan 23, 2008 was the
Re: (Score:2)
For the longest time I've wondered what the appropriate word is to describe Digg's front page. All the "Top x" lists drive me insane. Thanks for letting me know that the correct word for it is "pap".
Re: (Score:1)
but how does it relate to the pap smear? That's what I want to know.
Re:Please, read what you write before you post it (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
tl:dr
"Does anyone else remember when the discussion was (Score:2)
more insightful than the summary?
Nope. Been here 10 years or so, and it's always been like this.
Except for OGG THE OPEN SOURCE CAVEMAN. That guy was insightful. I miss OGG
Re: (Score:2)
This is SlashDot. The discussion is _always_ more insightful than the summary and often the article.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I subscribe to alterslash for a reason.
You should check it out. It makes /. tolerable again!
Re: (Score:2)
I think the disagree mail posts are a welcome break from more serious news, but then I am not under the delusion that Slashdot is a landmark site in the tech industry so we're bound to have different opinions.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
I agree.
To all the complainers: What kind of nerds are you to complain about additional functionality?
If you don't like a function disable it.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
At least you can't read them anymore once the white-on-green color scheme burns out your retinas.
My Theory (Score:5, Interesting)
What spammers did was to use a slashdot email address as a destination. The idea is that a random, unsolicited yet strange email would solicit a reply, at which point you now have a validated email address to sell. Each message played to a particular emotion in hope to get a reply.
Each tactic:
Humility
Severity
Compassion
Offensive
While someone might not reply to offensive emails, that psyce might reply to calls for compassion. Or vice-versa.
This is actually good (Score:1)
Knowing that any letters may be posted publicly, even stupid ones, is a deterrent to sending stupid emails. I have seen it work for a political site I was running in 2002. We had abusive, targeted malware, and/or threatening emails coming in regularly until I started posting them, including full headers & reverse DNS info in the case of the malware.
Re: (Score:1)
I come for the replys (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
landmark site of the tech industry
It's because of things like Disagree Mail (okay, not that in particular but things like it) that makes Slashdot popular.
Alcohol... (Score:2)
Really. I wake up in the morning sometimes dreading what I've sent out over the 'net.
I've sent some strange stuff so I could envision my having asked about sheep or something all while thinking it was very funny. Usually, when I check my sent email messages and my forum posts I do so cautiously and hope for the best.
Re: (Score:1)
What we need is a pervasive set of net goggles [blogspot.com]. Your ISP should provide this service, methinks.
Re: (Score:2)
I think you need Google's Mail Goggles.
Or less beer. Or a computer breathalyser.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Alcohol... (Score:4, Funny)
50 mg of alcohol? Good heavens, I hope you meant 50 ppm.
2 kinds of people (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1, Offtopic)
Fixed it.
Alternatively, there are two types of people: Those who have removed Idle from their front page settings, and those who are going to once they're done posting here
Slow NewsDay? (Score:1, Offtopic)
Yes, I know the press yawns like a hungry, devouring beast. That why we get cr@p in the newspapers and on-air.
However, the web is pull, and you don't need to post when you've got nothing to say. Say it clearly!
Re:Slow NewsDay? (Score:4, Insightful)
you don't need to post when you've got nothing to say.
And yet here we are...
Re: (Score:2)
you don't need to post when you've got nothing to say.
And yet here we are...
.......... yup.
Re: (Score:2)
Me 2.
We don't like reading spam either (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:1, Redundant)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Have you ever done tech support for the general public? There are tons of legitimately side splittingly crazy people out there that I am sure you are crushing by calling their ravings spam.
Re: (Score:1)
Just click the "Reply to This" button and add your "disagree mail"!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes. But don't tell them I told you, otherwise they said the sheep would get it.,,
Oh Dear (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
I For One... (Score:5, Insightful)
Enjoy this mindless humor on a Friday.
"The less we talk about this first guy the better" (Score:2)
So naturally samzenpus decides to talk about him. Brilliant.
Antithesis of John C. Dvorak (Score:2, Insightful)
...who gets NO spam!
It's Samzenpus.... "I GET SPAM!"
Seriously, dude....get a spam filter or something. Stop spamming us with your spam.
Well then (Score:4, Funny)
"Hello, I am a 'generously proportioned' male (375 pounds) with a less than generous penile length (4 inches erect). I seek a vendor of quality inflatable sheep who can give away free samples as I am unemployed. Best regards.""
Well, I guess this answers the question, " Do inadequate fat men dream of inflatable sheep?"
Re: (Score:2)
"Hello, I am a 'generously proportioned' male (375 pounds) with a less than generous penile length (4 inches erect)"
How can he be sure?
Anyways...
Don't you have to touch the circle before you go off on a tangent?
These aren't as funny as someone thinks they are.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, I guess this answers the question, " Do inadequate fat men dream of inflatable sheep?"
Good. Now I can finally rest.
select * from disagree_mail where hilarity="lame" (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
This is becoming pointless (Score:3, Interesting)
These look more like misaddressed emails. Not so entertaining. And not very unique. Maybe it's time to go biweekly with disagree mail???
Re: (Score:2)
It was always pointless. Just chill dude and stop taking it so seriously.