Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Sci-Fi Idle

HOA Orders TARDIS Removed From In Front of Parrish Home 320

An anonymous reader writes A Florida couple learned that they are much bigger fans of Doctor Who than their homeowner association, after receiving a notice to remove the TARDIS from their driveway. Leann Moder and her husband David were given 15 days to get rid of the big blue box. From the article: "It was built by Moder's father as a wedding set piece, and she and her husband, David, were married in front of it. 'My husband mentioned, "Do you want to do a Doctor Who themed wedding?"' Moder said. 'That could be fun.' Since then, their TARDIS has been used at sci-fi conventions and parties, and was even the focus of a Halloween haunt the Moders set up on their driveway in October." The HOA had no comment on their stance on sonic screwdrivers, or the Eye of Harmony.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

HOA Orders TARDIS Removed From In Front of Parrish Home

Comments Filter:
  • by Qzukk ( 229616 ) on Wednesday January 07, 2015 @07:22PM (#48760549) Journal

    The homeowners association demands that unless every single house has a TARDIS in their front yard, yours must go.

    • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 07, 2015 @07:30PM (#48760611)

      If you don't want to conform, don't buy a home there.

      HOAs are completely up front about those things and if you don't read the bylaws before buying, you're a dumb motherfucker.

      • by Khashishi ( 775369 ) on Wednesday January 07, 2015 @07:48PM (#48760731) Journal

        That's all fine and good when there are infinite houses to choose from. In the real world, resources are limited, and most nice places already have overlords controlling them.

        • by ArcadeMan ( 2766669 ) on Wednesday January 07, 2015 @07:51PM (#48760771)

          That's your fault for buying a house in a Zerg area.

        • by AK Marc ( 707885 ) on Wednesday January 07, 2015 @08:32PM (#48761053)
          Actually very few areas in the US have HOAs. It's just that they are the more rich, white areas, which are more desirable. I've never lived in a place with an HOA, and only a handful of people I know live in such areas. They are often more expensive, as you are paying for the "privileged" of having someone boss you around. There must be lots of people into that. Though my current house is in an HOA area, but the HOA wasn't strong enough, so I bought the house from people who didn't sign the HOA paperwork (no idea how many owners before them didn't), so I own a non HOA house in an HOA neighborhood. Or maybe only the homes that have a plot at the local airstrip have to join the HOA.
          • You're paying for the privilege of having someone boss your neighbors around. You just happen to have to agree to being bossed around as well.
          • by tlambert ( 566799 ) on Wednesday January 07, 2015 @10:30PM (#48761795)

            Actually very few areas in the US have HOAs. It's just that they are the more rich, white areas, which are more desirable. I've never lived in a place with an HOA, and only a handful of people I know live in such areas. They are often more expensive, as you are paying for the "privileged" of having someone boss you around. There must be lots of people into that. Though my current house is in an HOA area, but the HOA wasn't strong enough, so I bought the house from people who didn't sign the HOA paperwork (no idea how many owners before them didn't), so I own a non HOA house in an HOA neighborhood. Or maybe only the homes that have a plot at the local airstrip have to join the HOA.

            Inaccurate. My sister's condo in a not fantastic area of Salt Lake City, Utah, has an HOA, and typical unit price is ~$80-$100K, which will buy you ... nothing ... in most richer areas.

            Typically, an HOA is a corporation the developer creates to market and sell lots and houses in a subdivision (or units in a condo complex). After that, membership becomes part of the restrictive covenants on the deeds of the properties sold within the development boundaries, and after a certain number of units have been sold, the ownership and responsibility is passed off to the owners within the development.

            HOAs cover about 25 million houses in the U.S., and close to 60 million people, which i to say, 20% of the U.S. population.

            Last time I checked, not even 20% of the U.S. population count as "wealthy" (i.e. not having to work unless they choose to do so).

            • by mrchaotica ( 681592 ) * on Thursday January 08, 2015 @09:22AM (#48764255)

              The main difference between HOA and non-HOA development is not the price range of the development, but rather the age of it. Up until something like the '70s or '80s almost no new subdivisions had HOAs; by the '90s almost all of them did. Therefore, if you want to live in a house less than 30 years old or so, you're probably going to have to accept an HOA.

              The correlation with richer, whiter areas is merely a consequence of white flight.

            • Disclosure: I am a realtor, mostly on the sell side 96% of the time, not representing the buyer. 4% representing the buyer. So I will speak from the selling side. And a big Doctor Who fan from the 80's
              HOA's, condo's, and Co-op's are a form of corporations (non-profit) that run the land you are on and issue a set of rules you need to abide by.

              When you buy into any of the above, you are required to abide by those rules. When I do a transaction I am required to present to you the rules of the association, some

          • by schnell ( 163007 ) <me@s c h n e l l . n et> on Wednesday January 07, 2015 @10:49PM (#48761905) Homepage

            Actually very few areas in the US have HOAs. It's just that they are the more rich, white areas, which are more desirable.

            Not in my experience (for whatever that's worth). I was part of a HOA with the first home I ever bought, which was part of a very middle-class neighborhood of townhouses. The development was a mix of older middle class families and younger first-time home buyers or - increasingly - immigrants who were taking advantage of the mid-2000s real estate situation to buy homes. I received a number of asinine warnings from the HOA about stuff like "you need to repaint your gutters within 30 days or zOMG CONTRACTUAL HELL WILL RAIN DOWN," which was enough to make me hate HOAs forever. But the real ire of the HOA was reserved for the immigrant families.

            And, at the risk of being very politically incorrect, what the HOAs were doing there was fighting behavior that had a potential impact on property values for the whole development. Townhouses with 5-8 cars parked outside around the clock, indicating huge over-occupancy; men hanging out all over the steps and front yard all day; loud parties late into the night, etc. Why? Potential racism aside, it was because the people in the neighborhood were not so well off that a decline in property values due to their neighbors' actions wouldn't have a big impact on them. Years later, when I moved into a much nicer/richer neighborhood, there was no HOA to be found - nor would the proudly wealthy and independent residents have stood for anyone telling them what to do with their property.

            I am not condoning targeting any group for HOA persecution, and again I was very put off by my experience with a HOA. But I am saying that HOAs are not generally needed in neighborhoods that are so rich that anyone who would degrade the property value couldn't move in there anyway. HOAs will tend to be most prevalent in those areas which are "kinda white" and/or "kinda rich" where there is some worry that people who could move in there might disrupt the community or lower property values. In truly rich/white places, there is simply no need for that.

        • Your assertion does not constitute fact. Your first sentence is straw anyway as there never were an infinite number of houses. There are plenty of houses to purchase that aren't in HOA parcels or have "overlords" as you call them. Having owned three houses, I speak from experience.
      • by TechyImmigrant ( 175943 ) on Wednesday January 07, 2015 @07:48PM (#48760737) Homepage Journal

        Not in my case. I didn't see the bylaws of my HOA until I had been it's president for 18 months. It didn't help that it was in a messed up master-sub association hierarchy intended to leave the power in the hands of the developer, so there were multiple sets of rules flying around, only a subset of of which were passed to homeowners.

        Fortunately, that leaves the HOA relatively powerless if it comes to a lawsuit and my goal as president was to stop the crazies trying to use the HOA as a tool to crap on their neighbors and settle old differences.

        HOAs are evil, in that they are perfectly constructed to set neighbor against neighbor. We would be better off without them.
         

        • by Rinikusu ( 28164 ) on Wednesday January 07, 2015 @08:15PM (#48760935)

          And to think, some folks think we could have *no* government at all because private parties would never do such things...

        • by AK Marc ( 707885 )
          If you don't get the bylaws before you buy, and sign them before you buy, then you aren't bound by them. Lots of the HOAs are "illegal" in that sense, and would lose nearly every suit brought against them.
          • by DRJlaw ( 946416 ) on Wednesday January 07, 2015 @08:41PM (#48761147)

            If you don't get the bylaws before you buy, and sign them before you buy, then you aren't bound by them. Lots of the HOAs are "illegal" in that sense, and would lose nearly every suit brought against them.

            Woefully wrong interpretation of the law in the jursidictions that I'm familiar with.

            The whole reason that rather tony old neighborhoods do not have HOAs while rather tony new neighborhoos tend to have HOAs is that HOAs are created through a deed restriction. When you create the subdivision you create the HOA. Where the subdivision already exists, there's no single body that owns the properties and can tie their deeds together.

            You're on constructive notice concerning deed restrictions. If you fail to research the bylaws and regulations springing out those restrictions, it's on you -- the HOA will likely win the suit that they bring against you.

            • by AK Marc ( 707885 )
              I had no deed restrictions. So the house was never in the HOA, from what people are telling me, and that the HOA must have only existed for those houses that joined the airstrip, though I get HOA notices from the HOA that I'm not a member of.
          • by silfen ( 3720385 )

            If you don't get the bylaws before you buy, and sign them before you buy, then you aren't bound by them

            That's wrong. It's the seller's responsibility to ensure that the buyer is aware of the CC&Rs. If the seller fails in that responsibility, he may be liable to the buyer because the buyer didn't get what he thought he was paying for. But the CC&Rs still apply.

            • by AK Marc ( 707885 )
              No, it's right, but in my cases, the CC&Rs weren't deed restrictions. My statement is 100% correct, but signing the deed to take ownership is binding on them. I've moved into an HOA area, but the HOA wasn't on the deed. It was voluntary. And for the condos I've owned, the CC&Rs weren't attached to the title because you (obviously) don't get a clear title for a condo. You get a part-ownership of a larger item, with cross leases, and other legal tweaks that vary by jurisdiction. That is has covena
          • by LordNimon ( 85072 ) on Wednesday January 07, 2015 @11:02PM (#48761981)

            If you don't get the bylaws before you buy, and sign them before you buy, then you aren't bound by them.

            That is completely false.

        • by silfen ( 3720385 )

          Not in my case. I didn't see the bylaws of my HOA until I had been it's president for 18 months.

          You should have asked for the CC&Rs when you bought the place. If you didn't, it's your fault. If you did and the seller put in writing that they were none, it's his fault and he is liable.

          HOAs are evil, in that they are perfectly constructed to set neighbor against neighbor. We would be better off without them.

          You're free to buy in places without HOAs.

        • I am a Florida HOA and POA president and I agree that there is a huge problem with these orgs having powers over people. There is also a problem with the state of Florida and federal laws not wanting to be of help to condominiums. What it really boils down to is that people don't really get a real deed when they buy a condo. What they get is the right to live in the aprtment if they follow all of the rules. And what rules can and can not be considered are not really controlled by the courts or t
      • Sometimes you run into problems though:
        1. Life changes. People get married and trade in their coupe for a 4 door or even a SUV when they start having kids. However, a home is a much longer term investment.
        2. Not being aware - they should be, but many have the blinders on for the purchase of their new home. Like anything, home buying is something experience makes you better at.
        3. The character of the HOA itself changing - the old busybody dies or retires, you get a new one that's even more a fussbudget

      • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 07, 2015 @07:49PM (#48760751)

        "HOAs are completely up front about those things and if you don't read the bylaws before buying, you're a dumb motherfucker."

        Wrong. The "consent" to the "contract" is usually a legal fiction known as "constructive notice"; i.e., the H.O.A. corporation's governing documents were filed with the county, therefore the homeowner should have known about them.

        This concept was best illustrated in that scene from "The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy", when the construction foreman informs Arthur Dent that "the plans were on display".

        "But Mr. Dent, the plans have been available in the local planning office for the last nine months."

        "Oh yes, well as soon as I heard I went straight round to see them, yesterday afternoon. You hadn't exactly gone out of your way to call attention to them, had you? I mean, like actually telling anybody or anything."

        "But the plans were on display ..."

        "On display? I eventually had to go down to the cellar to find them." "That's the display department."

        "With a flashlight."

        "Ah, well the lights had probably gone."

        "So had the stairs."

        "But look, you found the notice didn't you?"

        "Yes," said Arthur, "yes I did. It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying 'Beware of the Leopard'."

        I've been trying to get documents and records -- including the governing documents, rules and regulations, etc., from my H.O.A. for several years. In response, they decided to stop accepting my H.O.A. dues payments so they could turn around and sue me for not paying them.

        See my web site, madisonhillhoa.com [madisonhillhoa.com] , for details (it hasn't been updated because I've been busy with the court case). You can also get a free copy of my book in PDF form from that site, at madisonhillhoa.com/book [madisonhillhoa.com]

        • by able1234au ( 995975 ) on Thursday January 08, 2015 @01:39AM (#48762529)

          I agree with AC. By sending the money directly to a board member you may be exposing them to risk (losing the money, misusing it etc). You are playing the passive aggressive approach and then getting upset that they are fining you. You are causing the fight.

          I am in Australia and HOA are totally unknown to me. The closest is the agreements that unit (condo) owners have to abide by and i have heard of similar petty issues. One was where the association would not agree to having cable TV laid throughout the condo building so most owners had to install satellite instead. That happened simply because some older owners did not want cable themselves so would not allow the buildings funds to used to install it. Even though it would add value to the building, even if they don't use it themselves. Sometimes people just look for something to fight about.

      • by bobbied ( 2522392 ) on Wednesday January 07, 2015 @07:54PM (#48760787)

        This is not exactly true. Many HOA's "make it up as they go" and you find out later you are in violation of somebody's made up rule.

        Mine, for instance, sent me a warning letter giving me 15 days to remove an "above ground pool" from my back yard (that had been there 4 years previously) but nowhere is "above ground pool" or anything approaching that even mentioned in the deed restrictions. I know, I read though the 30 pages three times looking for it. I even called the property management company and asked them where it was and THEY couldn't find it. Turns out, it was in ANOTHER document, one that I was not aware existed and one that the HOA board had authored well after the deed restrictions where filed on my home, without my knowledge or consent.

        So, what you say is NOT always true. They often do change the rules AFTER the fact and Realtors often gloss over the HOA's authority except to tell you if there are any dues. Usually there is the "transfer paperwork" that is supposed to give you all the details, or at least warn you that there are details you should be warned about, but that is presented to the buyer at closing to sign in a 3 inch stack of paper with hundreds of "initial here" and "Sign here" stickers and who has time to actually understand all that mess? Besides, the REAL details of the HOA are in the deed restrictions and in the 5+ closings in two separate states I've attended in my lifetime I've NEVER seen them in the stack of paperwork.

        Personally, I think HOA's are an OK idea that has been made into a really bad one by the builders who use them. My primary problem with them is that they NEVER ever end. It doesn't matter what happens to my current house, in 100 years the HOA will STILL be there. Something tells me that in 100 years, circumstances are likely to change and the HOA will be a legal problem with no good solution.

        • Comment removed based on user account deletion
        • but that is presented to the buyer at closing to sign in a 3 inch stack of paper with hundreds of "initial here" and "Sign here" stickers and who has time to actually understand all that mess?

          The most expensive and important purchase in your life ... and you sign your name without bothering to read it? Seriously?

          Dumbass, thats your own fault.

          • by anagama ( 611277 )

            If you read the fine print on everything you do every day, you would have about 6 hours a year left to work, sleep, eat, and go on vacation. Secondly, the stuff is such a convoluted mish mash of boilerplate from different sources, an attorney spending a week on the documents would likely only be able to tell you what it means in terms of probabilities (section XI.3.a probably means ______, but it could also mean _____ when read in conjunction with 4.e, etc. etc.).

        • Buildings do not normally have a service life of 100 years. At some point after 50 years has passed the owners will sell the property and with luck a handsome proffit will be made and parceled out to the owners. The land plowed flat with new buildings may be worth ten times what the original owners paid for their units or even more.
        • sounds to me like it's time to say "I never signed that, so let's just let the court decide if that document is binding on me. My lawyer's number is XXX, consider this your verbal trespass warning so be careful when spying into my back yard. Further direct contact will be considered harassment. Have a good day!"
        • Often times, HOA rules will change through committees or votes held at meetings, etc. I imagine there is a clause in most HOA agreements that rules can change through a specific process that you sign off on in the paperwork.

          Now, in my experience they also don't notify you of pending changes, so it's still pretty shady. Once while I was biking through my neighborhood on a route I don't usually take, I happened to go by the elementary school. There was a small sign next to the driveway where people drop off
      • by caseih ( 160668 )

        HOAs are kind of like unions. Yes you know about them up front, but you can't do anything to opt out, except buy elsewhere. If an HOA is completely opt-in, then I'm okay with it. More and more, though, HOAs are thinly disguised vehicles for keeping property prices artificially inflated. I'm kind of surprised they have the power to force a home buyer to become a part of it (except in the case of a condo complex perhaps, or an area where the grounds are kept by a third party).

      • As a European, I find this "if you don't want to conform, don't buy a home there" stance - why, indeed the very notion of these so-called "homeowner associations" - as yet another proof that Americans are crazy. How come that you can't put a wooden box on your front yard in the "land of the free"?
        • by jellomizer ( 103300 ) on Wednesday January 07, 2015 @08:32PM (#48761059)

          The HOA are a way to have European like snobbery, without complicated birthrights.

        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          by silfen ( 3720385 )

          How come that you can't put a wooden box on your front yard in the "land of the free"?

          You can, if you buy private land. If you buy in an HOA, you cannot.

          As a European, I find this "if you don't want to conform, don't buy a home there" stance - why, indeed the very notion of these so-called "homeowner associations" - as yet another proof that Americans are crazy.

          This works exactly the same way in Europe: you can buy private land, and there are a variety of restrictions, easements, and rules depending on wher

          • That one is easy. You do not own the lawn around your condo. It is a common element and is maintained in its original condition or by a higher standard assigned by the condo board.
          • This works exactly the same way in Europe: you can buy private land, and there are a variety of restrictions, easements, and rules depending on where you buy.

            Yet all the regulations where I live are municipal, and the people responsible for them are elected town officials. We don't have any paragovernmental commercial organizations here.

      • Damn right. How could they have missed the entire paragraph dedicated to the neighborhood-wide ban on lifesize tardis's.
      • A HOA is upfront about the fact that they don't want a TARDIS in your driveway? I doubt it.
        Also, in many cases, the HOA bylaws are not made available to you until closing. By that time, going back on the deal could cause you to lose thousands of dollars in earnest money. The agents know that if you have access to the bylaws, it lowers your chance of wanting to buy in that subdivision as no one wants to have the largest investment in their life subject to the desires of some nosy neighbor who has no investm
        • by AK Marc ( 707885 )
          I've read the rules that state "nothing visible, unless otherwise allowed". and yes, that includes boats, cars and the like. You have to park your boat in the back where nobody can see it, or you are in violation of the HOA rules. Overnight guests must park in your garage or on the street, as they aren't allowed in the driveway overnight. I've seen them down to rules on drawing blinds.
        • by silfen ( 3720385 )

          By that time, going back on the deal could cause you to lose thousands of dollars in earnest money.

          Your approval of the CC&Rs is a contingency that you need to remove. If you don't remove that contingency, it's no different than if the house fails inspection. It's in the seller's interest to get you the CC&Rs ASAP so that you remove that contingency ASAP.

          The agents know that if you have access to the bylaws, it lowers your chance of wanting to buy in that subdivision

          Maybe you need to find a better a

        • Also, in many cases, the HOA bylaws are not made available to you until closing.

          That is bananas. Here in British Columbia you don't have HOAs, but when you buy a condo or townhouse you fall under the condo board's bylaws. It's perfectly reasonable to ask for them during the due diligence process (and in some cases they're publicly online for all to read, e.g. http://www.freesiavancouver.co... [freesiavancouver.com] ).

          You may be asked to cover the cost of photocopying them, but that's it.

        • by vux984 ( 928602 )

          A HOA is upfront about the fact that they don't want a TARDIS in your driveway? I doubt it.

          My bylaws, for example, state that:

          Only licensed vehicles with current registration and insurance can be left on the driveways, that they must not hang out onto the road, and all wheels must be on the driveway.

          It also has specific exclusions disallowing the long term storage of trailers, boats, and RVs on the driveway (or front yard).

          A tardis, while not mentioned specifically, is definitely against the rules, along wi

        • by jd2112 ( 1535857 ) on Wednesday January 07, 2015 @10:22PM (#48761729)

          A HOA is upfront about the fact that they don't want a TARDIS in your driveway? I doubt it.

          This may be the reason why so few Doctor Who episodes are set in the States...

      • by Charliemopps ( 1157495 ) on Wednesday January 07, 2015 @08:46PM (#48761187)

        If you don't want to conform, don't buy a home there.

        HOAs are completely up front about those things and if you don't read the bylaws before buying, you're a dumb motherfucker.

        A compulsory regulation on your home that exists in nearly every neighborhood you could possibly buy in the town you live is in no way "Optional" In my opion HOA's should be illegal.

        I would never sign an HOA, and when I buy a house that's usually a problem because there are very few houses in town that do not have them. On the bright side, they are not that hard to ruin should you so chose and not mind alienating your neighbors. There are always loopholes, and ways you can make your house so annoying they'll eventually relent and let you do what you want to do. For example, they cannot prevent the construction of an amateur radio tower unless it's unsafe. There are long and drawn out discussions out on the net about how to pull this off, so I'll not get into it. But if done correctly you have a giant geeky eysore up for under $1000

        A fellow around here went to a lawyer and picked appart his HOA contract until he finally settled on blanketing his front yard with toilets. He put daisies in the bowl of each one and called them "Flower pots"

        After hearing all that I almost wish I'd been stupid enough to sign one. I would thoroughly enjoy pranking them constantly.

        • You are exactly why I like having an HOA, even when they don't work in my favor...

          Get into an expensive enough neighborhood and your pranks won't go over very well, people with more money than you have can bankrupt you with lawyer costs.

          Winning isn't required, just ruining you is...

      • No problem. Since you have a TARDIS, you can just use it to go back in time to when the bylaws were made and put in an exclusion clause.

        What? You can't go back in time? Well, then you don't have a TARDIS, you just have a POLICE BOX.
      • by fightinfilipino ( 1449273 ) on Wednesday January 07, 2015 @11:29PM (#48762097) Homepage
        if you think HOAs are "completely up front about those things", you're a dumb motherfucker.
    • by NoNonAlphaCharsHere ( 2201864 ) on Wednesday January 07, 2015 @07:48PM (#48760735)
      That's because HOA board members' heads are smaller on the inside.
    • HOA to homeowners: ELIMINATE!
    • by silfen ( 3720385 )

      That's why you should check the CC&Rs before you buy something somewhere. If you don't like the restrictions, don't buy.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 07, 2015 @07:24PM (#48760563)

    Leaving a TV prop replica sitting in your driveway is douchey. Store it in the garage, or your storage shed, or the back yard, or a storage facility. Nobody in your neighborhood likes Doctor Who so much that they want to come home to your driveway TARDIS every day. Stop being a douche.

    • by blang ( 450736 ) on Wednesday January 07, 2015 @07:40PM (#48760689)

      using words like doucey is just as douchey and should be cause for instant expultion from any proper HOA.

    • by brantondaveperson ( 1023687 ) on Wednesday January 07, 2015 @11:02PM (#48761979) Homepage

      No. No it isn't. It's fine. You Americans love your freedom of speech, but when it comes to living next door to a slightly more interesting house than the usual cookie-cutter bland beige boxes you get all hot under the collar and start using words like "douchey".

      Which, of course, isn't a word.

      Just get over it. HOAs *should* be illegal, and I wonder how far they'd get if tested in a court of actual law.

    • Leaving a TV prop replica sitting in your driveway is douchey. Store it in the garage, or your storage shed, or the back yard, or a storage facility.

      This thing looks big enough to be a problem for our local zoning board. Basically a full-sized shed or playhouse more less permanently installed on your front yard --- which is not a particularly good idea for any number of reasons.

  • live by the sword (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward

    Die by the sword. If you dislike the rules, don't go live in an HOA. Zero sympathy.

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by sandytaru ( 1158959 )
      These days it's hard to find a new construction home that isn't part of a neighborhood that has a HOA.... unless you build yourself on one of the abandoned PVC farms from 2008. Our house was the show room foreclosed on such a property, and thus we got a new house while escaping the clutches of the HOA that never was.
      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        by Anonymous Coward

        "These days it's hard to find a new construction home that isn't part of a neighborhood that has a HOA"

        Municipal governments have been requiring H.O.A. corporations as a condition of granting building permits to housing developers.

        That way, the home owner gets to pay the private H.O.A. corproation for traditional municipal functions like parks, street maintenance, trash removal, etc., while the government still gets to collect taxes for those goods and services they no longer have to provide.

        The home owners

        • by Calydor ( 739835 )

          It's a good thing Americans revolted over that whole taxation without representation thing and completely removed it from their country for all time, never to be reinstated.

      • by Greyfox ( 87712 )
        Couple years ago when I was in the market, I looked at 11 houses in one day. Funnily, not a single one of them was in an HOA. I made sure of that. I got an awesome house in an awesome neighborhood -- there's a guy a block away who painted his house purple, and has a car that matches the color. Part of what gives the neighborhood its character is that we don't have to worry about a bunch of fucking crab people getting up in our shit. Maybe they should build a bunch of fucking crab people next to their tardis
        • If enough people were to infiltrate the HOA, could the HOA vote to disband itself? That might be a fun hobby...

          Depends on your specific HOA covenants. They will dictate what course of action is necessary to do so. The most common I'm familiar with:

          1) The builder actually maintains final authority over the HOA, so it couldn't possibly be disbanded unless the builder agreed (ie: not gonna happen)

          2) If there is no builder with final authority (mostly that's older HOAs) then the board can decide to put disbandment up for a vote, in which case a certain percentage (either of all homeowners, or of actual voters) would hav

      • by AK Marc ( 707885 )
        So stop shopping for new builds in rich white neighborhoods. You do know why HOAs started? It was't about unifying the look, but as a way of giving homeowners a way of driving out the uppity minorities that tried to buy in the "wrong" neighborhood. They belong on the other side of the tracks.
      • Buy where you want and rehab. You get a good house that you ultimately have crafted to your likes.
    • nonsense, it is possible to fight an HOA and win. all about tactics and psychology.

    • Die by the sword. If you dislike the rules, don't go live in an HOA. Zero sympathy.

      I'd agree with you if it was REQUIRED that prospective byers be notified of more than just the annual cost of the HOA's dues by the seller. Buyers should be presented with the deed restrictions that establish the HOA at the time they make their offer and have a customary length of time to read, get legal advice on and accept the restrictions and costs or be released from the contract to buy. I would also agree with you if HOA's could only enforce rules which are actually recorded each and every deed expli

      • by AK Marc ( 707885 )

        I'd agree with you if it was REQUIRED that prospective byers be notified of more than just the annual cost of the HOA's dues by the seller.

        It has been where I've signed in. I've never been part of an HOA, but the condo rules for the two condos I've had both had the full covenants available at closing. If they aren't there, walk away.

  • by Harlequin80 ( 1671040 ) on Wednesday January 07, 2015 @07:27PM (#48760593)

    Looking at the photos it kinda looks like it is just left on the driveway. But that said I don't like the idea of being told that I have to remove it.

    Would they have more luck if they placed it on a plinth and maybe had it decorated in with a cyberman?

    • I'm willing to bet an ugly Nativity scene with plywood cut-outs would be there 365 days a year without a peep.
  • by cashman73 ( 855518 ) on Wednesday January 07, 2015 @07:27PM (#48760595) Journal
    Of course, a true Whovian will install some nice statues of weeping angels in the front yard!
  • by NEDHead ( 1651195 ) on Wednesday January 07, 2015 @07:33PM (#48760641)

    bada boom

    • Speaking of "About Time", I recommend the movie of that name. It was a bit sad, but I felt worth the ride. Haunting musical score, too.

      • Speaking of "About Time", I recommend the movie of that name. It was a bit sad, but I felt worth the ride. Haunting musical score, too.

        I recommend the 1960s TV comedy series by that name ("It's About Time").

        Oooo! Oooo!

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]

        Strat

  • Silly story (Score:4, Interesting)

    by DoofusOfDeath ( 636671 ) on Wednesday January 07, 2015 @07:33PM (#48760643)

    HOA rules: You can't have $(object X) sitting in your driveway.

    $(object X) being a TARDIS neither makes me outraged, nor makes this news for nerds.

    • and now you are just being silly.

    • by havana9 ( 101033 )

      HOA rules: You can't have $(object X) sitting in your driveway.

      $(object X) being a TARDIS neither makes me outraged, nor makes this news for nerds.

      It amazes me, that in the self-appointed "land of the free" one in his private property has to follow some oddball rules about what is allowed and what is not allowed. Oddball rules that are not readily available to read, and not written by some democratically elected body. Besides I don't like nosy people watching what I'm doing in my home: i always wonders why in the US the houses don't have walls and fences...

  • by Anonymous Coward

    As a corporation, an H.O.A. is a defective product.

    The purpose of a corporation is to protect an investor's personal assets from the debts and liabilities of the corporation.

    For example, if you owned 1,000 shares of Enron, the only thing you had at risk were those shares. The creditors of Enron could not go after your house, your car, your bank account, etc.

    But an H.O.A. corporation works exactly the opposite. The assets of an H.O.A. corporation are the obligations of the home owners to pay the uninsured

  • I'll take "Reasons why I'll never live in a house governed by an HOA", for $1000, Alex?

  • If I can pay for a house I would summarily refuse to be a member of a homeowners association. At the time of buying, I'd check and make sure there's no Home owner's association or if there was make sure the contract said I was somehow exempt or just not a member of the association and not subjects to its bylaws. Possibly having police or attorney presence.

    • by Greyfox ( 87712 )
      The contracts for those houses typically state that you can't sell the house unless the buyer agrees to be in the HOA, so you'd just not be buying that house. But it's not such a problem -- the real estate web sites list whether they're in HOAs or not, so you can just exclude the ones that are. There are plenty of good houses out there without having to get involved with the crab people.
      • by AK Marc ( 707885 )
        I bought a house that was in an HOA, but an owner (previous to the people I bought the house from) didn't get the HOA documents signed at closing. I'm exempt. I'm not a member, and there's nothing they can do about it. You can sign everything but the HOA documents, and leave. What happens next is not well defined. Can the HOA place a lein against your house to require you to sign the documents? Can they sue the previous owners? I'm sure they'll threaten lots, but I've never seen a case where an HOA w
        • Actually, you most likely are not exempt. Most HOA's are a deed restriction on the property and it is explicitly worded in such a way that it carries over to all subsequent owners automatically by virtue of you accepting title to the property. It works in the same manner as being a part of your city or township. When you close on the house, you don't sign anything which states you agree you are subject to the ordinances of your city or township, but that doesn't mean you are exempt from those ordinances. Th

  • EPCOT has a British phone booth but no Police Box. They could really use it. Looks like Parrish is ~111 miles from Orlando.

"All the people are so happy now, their heads are caving in. I'm glad they are a snowman with protective rubber skin" -- They Might Be Giants

Working...