Amazon Screenplay-Writing Software Submits Work To Amazon Studios (thestack.com) 33
An anonymous reader writes: Amazon has released new screenplay-writing software aimed to help connect new writing talent to its original content production company, Amazon Studios. Storywriter contains many of the autoformatting tools familiar to users of similar software such as Final Draft and Celtx, but no other screenwriting tool can claim to actually send unknown writers' output to potentially interested producers.
Could this be used for porn? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Why not? I mean you kinda need something besides cocaine to do in between boners. Why not get turned on by the plot just before getting turned on by the content?
Besides, I bet more women would watch more porn if there was a decent plot. Look at the popularity of soft porn like 50 shades of grey.
Re: (Score:2)
Would have been perfect with Morena Baccarin.
Re: (Score:2)
I was wondering where that was going and followed it through to the end. I came!
Re: (Score:2)
Some japanese "eroge", hentai games or whatever you want to call these actually have very good plots. Good enough to stand on their own without the porn.
That's...odd (Score:3)
I simply can not imagine how big that slush pile is going to grow. Even if they run an automated grammar check or something and reject the out-and-out fails without human intervention, they are going to get so many submissions they aren't going to be able to keep up.
I give it two weeks.
Re: (Score:1)
Whatever you're on, you need either a lot less or a lot more.
Small print (Score:5, Informative)
I'm not sure WHAT they could possibly change to rape screenwriters harder, in this, but by God if they think of something, you've already agreed to it! :D
And so another field of human endeavor is Uber-fied
Re: (Score:2)
I'm no lawyer but wouldn't this be considered an agreement of adhesion perhaps even to the point of being potentially unconscionable? I can't see how any rational person would agree to this.
Re: Small print (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
But the person agreeing to it is a screenwriter....definitely not rational.
Re: (Score:1)
What this is saying is that by submitting your idea to Amazon, you're acknowledging that Amazon may be receiving submissions with ideas similar to yours, and that because of this, you should not expect to be compensated for this.
This reads similarly to the release forms that Hollywood studios and agencies require you to sign before they consider submissions, especially unsolicited ones.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, this isn't all that unusual at all. It's pretty consistent with the unsolicited ideas submission policies of most major companies.
With that said, if these terms scare you, and if you don't care about submitting to Amazon, but just want a web-based script writing platform, check out WebScripted TV [webscriptedtv.com]. It's kind of preliminary (translation: I'm the only developer, only user, and only tester), and I had to work around dozens of really bad bugs and misbehavior in various browsers' HTML editing functionalit
Re: (Score:2)
They, the real professionals, might review this site for ideas. They'll just change a few names around, make the setting sightly different, and call the idea their own. This is a stupid idea and they are stupid for enabling it. Nothing good will come of this except for a few key events that are short-lived. It will look like a success on paper (at best) and be in the news no more than three times as a success. If it's in the news beyond that then it will be for negatives such as the above mentioned copying
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I figure that's true for the first few which is why I included that.
I'm sure there will be a few 'success' stories at first.
Perhaps you missed it or I wasn't clear enough? Or do you think they're going to *keep* doing that after the first few and they've gained the PR boost from it? If so then, well, I don't think that's going to happen. They'll end up getting labor at next to nothing if not just outright stealing the ideas and changing them enough to ensure they don't violate any agreements. Their terms of service indicate that they've already concluded that ma
Re: Small print (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
No, they are not agreeing. It's an automated process. You, on the other hand, are agreeing to the terms. They can not be expected to read each and every submission to its conclusion nor can they be reasonably expected to respond to such. No judge, even if they steal your work, will give you any consideration for this. No lawyer will take it on contingency. No jury will award you damages or find in your favor.
I am not a lawyer but this is legal advice: Do not listen to the parent poster without getting profe
Re: (Score:1)
Talented software?! (Score:1)
The title *could* have been written more clearly, you know.. I read it as the *software itself* submitted a screenplay to Amazon. So that's where A.I. develops literary talents? Frankly, it could be an improvement// I suppose.