Comcast Raises Cable TV Bills Again -- Even If You're Under Contract (arstechnica.com) 128
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Comcast is raising its controversial "Broadcast TV" and "Regional Sports Network" fees again on January 1, with the typical total price going from $14.50 to $18.25 a month. The newly raised broadcast TV fee will be $10 a month, and the sports fee will be $8.25 a month, Cord Cutters News reported last week. The new fee sizes are confirmed in a Comcast price list for the Atlanta market. The new price hikes will take effect in most of Comcast's regional markets across the U.S. on January 1, but some cities will get the increase later in 2019, a Comcast spokesperson told Ars. The fee sizes can vary by city based on which stations are available, so in some cases they could be less than $10 and $8.25, Comcast said.
The fees, which have become common in the industry, are controversial because they are not included in Comcast's advertised prices and because Comcast imposes fee increases even on customers who are under contract. The broadcast and sports fee increases will also be applied to customers who pay Comcast's promotional rates, which typically last one year, Comcast told Ars. Equipment rental fees are rising, too. Comcast last year raised its modem rental fee from $10 to $11 a month. The new price list for January 1 lists an "Internet/Voice Equipment Rental" fee as $13. Comcast confirmed to Ars that the modem rental fee is rising $2 a month. Customers can avoid that fee by purchasing their own modem.
The fees, which have become common in the industry, are controversial because they are not included in Comcast's advertised prices and because Comcast imposes fee increases even on customers who are under contract. The broadcast and sports fee increases will also be applied to customers who pay Comcast's promotional rates, which typically last one year, Comcast told Ars. Equipment rental fees are rising, too. Comcast last year raised its modem rental fee from $10 to $11 a month. The new price list for January 1 lists an "Internet/Voice Equipment Rental" fee as $13. Comcast confirmed to Ars that the modem rental fee is rising $2 a month. Customers can avoid that fee by purchasing their own modem.
TV=Waste of money (Score:5, Insightful)
I see an ad for TV+Internet for $35 and when all of the fees and taxes are added in it comes out to more like $80. Very deceptive advertising practices. In some cases, its hard to get out of them what the actual fees and taxes will be. Then, probably the make it so the first bill comes only after the 30 day gaurantee is up. There is nothing worth watching on TV anyway (and really even on NetFlix). Much is designed for the lowest common denominator, you can feel your IQ dropping just being exposed to it. Much of the news, especially CNN, is complete disinformation propoganda and lies to turn people into America hating nutjobs. I don't watch TV, and its great.
Cordcutting isn't cheap (Score:2)
I think Comcast figured out that cord cutting isn't cheap. So they have less to fear from competition. If they raise the ala carte prices too then then they also have more room to cut you a deal on that "internet phone cable " bundle.
Re: (Score:2)
However, the only reason cord cutting isn't cheap is the same reason people are on FB:
FOMO.
Why aren't people ok with just NF or Prime?
I talk to people who have like 4, 5 or 6 different streaming services for content.
WTF!?
Why?!?
Re: (Score:2)
I haven't subscribed to cable TV myself in ... at least 15 years. I've had it in the house occasionally due to roommates and the like but never bothered to hook it up for myself.
I do laugh at people who still spend endless hours watching whatever shows. On the odd chance one interests me, i'll download the whole series and watch it at my leisure - usually on a long flight or while commuting.
Otherwise netflix and amazon prime serve their purpose well enough, tho NF is only around because it's more annoying
Re: (Score:2)
Two words: Live Sports.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I do laugh at people who still spend endless hours watching whatever shows.
Often? Are you sitting in your chair at home just laughing and laughing?
I'd say be less concerned with what others are doing and read a book, but this seems to bring you more joy so keep at it :)
Re: (Score:2)
I see an ad for TV+Internet for $35 and when all of the fees and taxes are added in it comes out to more like $80. Very deceptive advertising practices. In some cases, its hard to get out of them what the actual fees and taxes will be. Then, probably the make it so the first bill comes only after the 30 day gaurantee is up. There is nothing worth watching on TV anyway (and really even on NetFlix). Much is designed for the lowest common denominator, you can feel your IQ dropping just being exposed to it. Much of the news, especially CNN, is complete disinformation propoganda and lies to turn people into America hating nutjobs. I don't watch TV, and its great.
Tbh many of these fees are to compensate for regulations you, dear voter, feel are important.
Like taxes at the store, get mad at yourself, not the store.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: TV=Waste of money (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No Reason for Cable/Sat TV (Score:2)
If you spend any appreciable amount of time surfing Cable TV channels, you need to rethink your life.
Netflix, $9 a month
Hulu, something like $9 a month
Amazon Prime, right in there too.
Throw in some specialty channels on specialty networks and you are at maybe $50 at most (plus internet connection). You can get local channels over the air if you want. And if you are too far away, you probably don't care.
Bottom line..cancel Cable/Sat TV. Get the channels you WANT to watch, and then....go outside.
Re: (Score:1)
P.S. buy a good cable modem if you haven't already, the overall cost is much lower and your provider can't turn your hardware into a hot spot for your neighbors. As for people who worry about equipment failure; most new equipment has a 2 year warranty and will pay for itself in less than 10 months. So even if you bought new equipment every two years when the warranty failed you
Re: (Score:2)
Re:TV=Waste of money (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm not certain why you think that companies who provide a service to the public should be locked in to prices and never be able to raise them...
Because you have a contract. It binds you to stay with the company for a specified period of time to keep your agreed price. It's supposed to bind Comcast in the same way, but the cable company has lawyers you couldn't afford.
Re: (Score:1)
If there weren't such crappy consumer protection laws then Comcast wouldn't be able to alter the deal leaving you praying they won't alter it further, but knowing they will because they can.
Re: (Score:2)
We should add more laws. Because government is not the reason for these monopolies... (hint, even Google can't break through the government barriers.)
Re: (Score:1)
I'm not certain why you think that companies who provide a service to the public should be locked in to prices and never be able to raise them...
Because you have a contract. It binds you to stay with the company for a specified period of time to keep your agreed price. It's supposed to bind Comcast in the same way, but the cable company has lawyers you couldn't afford.
Having more lawyers isn't a reasonable defense for skirting legalities, and can create larger problems in the future. If consumers get pissed enough at getting constantly screwed over by the ones with "more lawyers", then sensible actions go out the window, and unstable minds start talking about who has more guns. This is not a path those in power want to go down. Calmer heads do not always prevail, and history has shown that unending abuse towards the masses often leads to violence.
Personally I would ra
Re: (Score:2)
This is the purpose of class action suits but companies recently discovered they can put an arbitration clause in their contracts denying you the right to hold them accountable through the legal system and instead, on an individual basis, forces you to use a arbiter that almost always rules in favor of the company.
For awhile I tried to vote with my wallet by purposely avoiding doing business with companies that had arbitration clauses but now they're all doing it and so consequently it is impractical, if no
Re: (Score:2)
They will allow you to opt out, should you wish, in writing (snail-mail only) as long as your letter arrives in time.
And, of course, they keep asking you and you must keep opting out. Cute.
Re: (Score:2)
You are a troll.
None of what you says addresses the issue of deceptive practices by a functional monopoly. You distract with a tarbaby argument, that can go back-and-forth, long after the original criticism is lost in a thread of uninformed "debate".
All of which leads me to speculate, only half-idly, how much you are paid by Comcast, to dilute these forums?
Re: (Score:2)
And really. "Service to the public". That's really a rich choice of rhetoric. This Comcast! They're almost like Firefighters, aren't they!
Re: (Score:2)
I'm free to:
(1) Stream video.
(2) Read a book.
(3) Take a train upstate and go on a hike.
(4) Go skiing or biking.
(5) Converse with an actual human.
If all you talk about around the water cooler is the latest pap served up on TV, get better cow-orkers.
Re: (Score:3)
Great! (Score:1)
This is great for shareholder value. Cable TV fees were always too low.
People sometimes invite non-subscribers to watch tv, they should be charged a nominal monthly fee for this.
People sometimes mute commercials, they should be charged for this.
People sometimes use unauthorized/illegal DVRs, there should be be a fee for this.
People sometimes don't watch tv at all, they should be charged for this.
Poeple sometimes flip channels very quickly, missing commercials, they should be charged for this.
Re: (Score:2)
Please don't give those cocksuckers any further ideas.
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
for some they are the only internet choice (Score:2)
for some they are the only internet choice.
Other then maybe slow DSL or capped LTE
Re: (Score:2)
*other than*
This is a great turn of phrase, seeming to prove the point, and of course not.
Not a great choice, maybe not even a fair choice, but a choice. Patience. Band 71.
Re: (Score:2)
Not a great choice, maybe not even a fair choice, but a choice. Patience. Band 71.
It's a choice between internet that is unsuitable for purpose (DSL, LTE) or internet which is more or less suitable for purpose, which is no choice at all.
Re: (Score:2)
Sincerely boycotting Comcast may require tough choices:
- Changing your purpose to match what DSL is suitable for
- Changing your location to another city where the incumbent high-speed high-volume home Internet provider happens to be a company other than Comcast
Re: (Score:2)
Maw has died from dysentary.
Some are willing to move for better Internet (Score:2)
to another city where the incumbent high-speed high-volume home Internet provider happens to be a company other than Comcast
Moving? Really?
Yes really, according to these users [slashdot.org]. But not everyone feels moving for better Internet is practical, such as these users [slashdot.org].
Re: (Score:2)
"For a particular subscriber's monthly data transfer volume, the LTE providers are even more expensive than Comcast." Would this phrasing be more honest?
Re: for some they are the only internet choice (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Or satellite and dial-up. :(
Re: (Score:3)
Wow. All this time I thought they were 'competing' for your money. I'm betting they would not accept an eyeball in the post for payment.
Yes, I know your attention is marketable, but if the cable cos worked somewhat like Google or Facebook, for instance, your service would be free, but your TV would be on 24x7, you would have to wait through ads for what you aren't very interested in to actually *see* what you wanted, your DVR would include unskippable ads and would arbitrarily include whatever they wanted
comcast business static ip you are forced to rent (Score:2)
comcast business static ip you are forced to rent the modem
Re: (Score:2)
Are you forced to rent the modem? I think you can buy one.
Re: comcast business static ip you are forced to r (Score:2)
Re: comcast business static ip you are forced to (Score:2)
FIOS terminates ethernet at my house and offers static IP. No equipment rental required, I use my own routers. The only time my bill ever went up was when I switched to higher bandwidth plans, other than that same bill every month. Have been with them for over a decade now.
Re: comcast business static ip you are forced to (Score:2)
Re: comcast business static ip you are forced to (Score:2)
Re: comcast business static ip you are forced to (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Are you forced to rent the modem? I think you can buy one.
You can buy a modem and use your own if you have residential service, or business service with dynamic IP. Citing "security of their network" (yes, really), they do not allow business users with static IP services to bring their own modem.
Also, if you are a business subscriber with a plan over 60Mbits/sec and voice service, they will not let you use only one modem, since their voice modems don't support more than that. Even if you explicitly state you are fine being limited to 60Mbits/sec, they will refuse
Re: comcast business static ip you are forced to r (Score:3, Informative)
I'm not a Comcast fan, but this practice makes total sense and is the norm for the industry.
Because they can (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: Sue them? (Score:2)
Itâ(TM)s called a Contract of Adhesion. Perfectly normal in the business world, courts accept them as written, but reportedly many apply extra scrutiny and give the benefit of doubt to the consumer.
Re:"Cord Cutters" is a term created by cable co's (Score:4, Funny)
It's however like stepping back about 20 to 25 years. The programming on the air wave channels are re-runs of 1990's and early 2000 movies.
Ed Sullivan shows, BuzzR tv is game shows. that's fun.
This is caused by multipathing bounce from Tau Ceti. Go up there and tweak your antenna over another arcsecond.
Re:"Cord Cutters" is a term created by cable co's (Score:4, Informative)
You should tell your HOA that there is a federal law preventing them from restricting antenna installations unless they can show it doesn't put an unreasonable burden on you.
https://www.fcc.gov/media/over... [fcc.gov]
Re: (Score:3)
This. I've fought HOA's over this and won with a single page letter.
They can't argue with Federal law. Mount your dish wherever the heck you want to, and tell them to take a hike.
Side note: stuff like this is why I'll never move to an area with a HOA again. Too many unemployed, busybody, control freaks telling me what I can & can't do on my own property.
Talk about nickle and diming. (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah. This reminds me of the way Photobucket self-destructed, for some reason.
In related news... (Score:2)
Comcast also stated they will be raising fees on their buggy whip rentals, and mandating you buy one.
Re: (Score:3)
If you are pretty far out from the transmission antenna, 30 or 40 miles, you'll need something more substantial than that. You can install an outdoor antenna, in the attic if necessary due to regulations. If your in an apartment building your SOL. Apartment buildings used to have Master Antenna Systems (MATV) to serve the complex for free with an antenna on the roof. But now many condo associations demand that you pay for cable TV as they get this bulk deal to signup the entire building. If your further out
Re: (Score:2)
Even if you rent, you may be able to install an antenna. If you own your property, there are federal laws that allow you to install an antenna for the purpose of receiving video broadcasts and despite what HOAs may claim, you can install them on your roof.
https://www.fcc.gov/media/over... [fcc.gov]
Re: (Score:2)
in the attic if necessary due to regulations
Yeah. I'm waiting for my HOA to try and enforce their antenna rules. Me and the FCC will tell them to go suck an egg.
Roku + digital antenna + streaming service (Score:2)
Problem solved.
I recently got Hulu for $12 a year. It's okay, but I would not pay much more than that. Curiousitystream for $20 a year is a better value for me.
Lots to choose from.
I think you can buy your own cable modem as well.
Re: (Score:3)
I think you can buy your own cable modem as well.
I have ComCast Business. Nope, you must rent it. Like a different comment says, I think it's for the business SLA -- in addition, they KNOW what's on the other end, how to access and configure it, and already have a warehouse full of 'em. If you've got your own modem, they don't know how to buy it or configure it, and you probably don't know know or have forgotten. But that's bad for their SLA, so I think modem rental is just a cost of doing business.
Curiousitystream for $20 a year is a better value for me.
I've been thinking about that (CS). Check out this. [vrv.co]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
>I have ComCast Business. Nope, you must rent it.
Nope. I have ComCast Business, and I bought my own modem.
Payback was (as I recall) 6 months. Makes good business sense financially, and turning off any "xfinity hot spots" is great for reducing liability. My Internet service is mine, and any schmuck walking by. Plus my own modem is more reliable. Haven't had to reset the modem yet- contrasted with the monthly routine with theirs.
Modems are a commodity item. There are dozens of flavors on Amazon for cry
Excellent...this may be great timing! (Score:2)
I just noticed yesterday that the local internet supplier is adding fiber to my location. $70/mo for 1Gig/symmetrical. Might finally make the jump...guess I'll hold off moving to Xfinity Mobile.
Equipment rental is highway robbery (Score:2)
And the stupid set top box that they installed several years ago is being charged 10 to 20 $ a month!
Just last week I had an hour long chat with Xfinity rep. Started with the low ball, 80$ a month triple play. Ended up at 130$ a month with two year contract. Compared to Gigabit internet from FiOS currently at 150$. Even that contract price has hidden fees it looks lik
Go on.... (Score:4, Informative)
Terminate service then. (Score:3)
While there may not be anything people can do about keeping their original contract prices, that failure to disclose substantially weakens their ability to hold people to remaining on that contract, and it wouldn't surprise me if they aren't able to actually enforce any early termination fees they might have decided should otherwise apply, particularly since the customer would have had no practical way to anticipate in advance that these changes were about to occur.
Re: (Score:2)
I think that such would only be applicable of a customer were expecting compensation for the changing of the terms of the original contract, for example, compensation equivalent to the difference between their new rates and old for the remaining duration of the contract. Which, as I had already suggested, they probably wouldn't be able to get.
IANAL, but I've read a bit about this sort of thing, and it's my understanding that since the customer would not have had any practical means of anticipating that
Retans fees (Score:1)
Your local TV stations, or more specifically their greedy parent companies, are to blame for the hike in Retransmission Fees. The ACA expects fees to keep going up. [multichannel.com] These fees vary from region to region.
The station owners have been using money from fees to buy more stations so they can leverage cable companies to raise fees.
Getting rid of the fees would require fixing the retransmission consent provision [wikipedia.org] of the 1992 United States Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act. That forces cable op
Re: (Score:2)
This.
I remember when cable TV systems were essentially community antennas. Because reception was crap in hilly areas and local TV broadcasts couldn't be seen in a large part of their market. So the cable systems provided value to the broadcasters (more viewers). And did so without asking for compensation from the local stations and networks.
One approach to breaking up the cable companies would be to offer free re-transmission rights to cooperatively owned cable systems. In effect, going back to the commun
and the wonder why people keep cutting the cord. (Score:1)
the higher the bill gets, the less people will stick around. the prices are already too high. remember when cable was supposed to not have commercials? you pay to watch, and still have to watch commercials. that makes no sense. they should make a free service, and have it paid for by running commercials during the broadcast. but nope, they want $ from everyone involved, from the lowly subscribing customers to the advertisers paying for the commercials. they really wonder why people keep ditching cable, the
Lies! "You can avoid the modem fee" my ass! (Score:1)
The long story is: I called into Tech Support because I wanted to upgrade to their Super Triple Play, because getting virtually EVERY channel and upgraded gigabit internet turn
Re: (Score:2)
How I read it the first time (Score:2)
"with the typical total price gouge from $14.50 to $18.25 a month."
Government intervention, please! (Score:2)
What happens if those customers under contract want to cancel? Will they get slapped with an early termination fee? I'm betting that's the norm.
My Christmas wish: I want the FTC and the FCC to slap around the TV and internet providers until they start acting right.
I'll even negotiate around political and economic ideals. I don't care if the government cancels existing benefits/protections or enacts new requirements, as long as these companies get the message.
shut... (Score:1)
49.99 per month (Score:2)
Aaahahahahahahahaha! *gasp* Hahahahahahahahahaha! (Score:2)
It's like the "Fuck you, I'm out." scene from Half-Baked.
But without anyone/anything cool.
I need a cigarette... and I don't even smoke.