8-Year-Old Calls Out NPR For Lack Of Dinosaur Stories (npr.org) 115
An 8-year-old from Minneapolis recently pointed out a big problem with NPR's oldest news show, All Things Considered. Leo Shidla wrote to his local NPR station: My name is Leo and I am 8 years old. I listen to All Things Considered in the car with mom. I listen a lot. I never hear much about nature or dinosaurs or things like that. Maybe you should call your show Newsy things Considered, since I don't get to hear about all the things. Or please talk more about dinosaurs and cool things.
Sincerely,
Leo
NPR: Leo has a point. All Things Considered is about to turn 50 years old. NPR's archivists found the word "dinosaur" appearing in stories 294 times in the show's history. By comparison, "senator" has appeared 20,447 times. To remedy the situation, All Things Considered invited Leo to ask some questions about dinosaurs to Ashley Poust, a research associate at the San Diego Natural History Museum. Leo wants to be a paleontologist when he grows up.
Sincerely,
Leo
NPR: Leo has a point. All Things Considered is about to turn 50 years old. NPR's archivists found the word "dinosaur" appearing in stories 294 times in the show's history. By comparison, "senator" has appeared 20,447 times. To remedy the situation, All Things Considered invited Leo to ask some questions about dinosaurs to Ashley Poust, a research associate at the San Diego Natural History Museum. Leo wants to be a paleontologist when he grows up.
Old dinosaur in the White House (Score:1, Flamebait)
Re: (Score:1)
Yes, Trump wasn't old.
Now do "Ha ha Biden is senile because he's been stuttering and making gaffes since *checks notes* the 1980s" because Trump wasn't showing any signs of mental deterioration at all.
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
Why are you bringing up Trump? He's not President nor relevant.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
By your logic, Hitler was beneficial to the world because he taught us that we should never have another person like Hitler in the world. ...ignoring, of course, all the horrific shit that was caused by Hitler the first time around.
Thankfully, Trump was nowhere near as intelligent or effective as Hitler. But that doesn't mean that he didn't cause an awful lot of death and destruction we could very bloody well have done without.
Comparing Trump to Hillary is like comparing Hitler to Stalin. Which would be bet
Re: Old dinosaur in the White House (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Don't tell me you fell for that fake graphic on facebook showing thousands of jobs in every state going away because of the pipeline.
Re: (Score:2)
> Don't tell me you fell for that fake graphic on facebook showing thousands of jobs in every state going away because of the pipeline.
Only the gullible former pipeline workers fell for that. What a bunch of rubes; no wonder they're unemployed.
Re: (Score:2)
> piping oil from Canada to an existing plant - there are no jobs involved anymore, compacted to trucks or boats.
For anyone that doesn't understand where the oil sands are... they won't be boating in oil from Canada. It won't be trucked in either.
It will be sent via Buffet/Gates owned rail lines. Granted, that will create some environmental clean up jobs as the trains are expected to derail and spill oil everywhere, 3-4 times a year.
Re: (Score:2)
It would be much better to use oil pipelines that don't spill any oil. But I guess that is just too much to ask for from liberals.
http://boldnebraska.org/keysto... [boldnebraska.org]
Re: (Score:2)
A paper cup with your name on it. Provided your name is Dixie.
All things considered... (Score:5, Insightful)
All things considered... with all the crap we've been seeing/hearing reported on lately, this submission is a refreshing change for today, and I approve of it.
Right on Leo! =)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:All things considered... (Score:4, Funny)
Indeed. Loud angry charging beefy animals 65 million years ago is better than hearing about loud angry charging beefy animals at the Capitol.
Re: (Score:2)
Was there a sale at the congressional cafeteria?
Re: (Score:1)
Yes, they sold out democracy and accountability.
Re: All things considered... (Score:1)
Like to see NPR ferret out government corruption (Score:1)
All things considered host made $331,000 in 2018 (Score:1)
Based on the other salaries at the non-profit they have dozens of people making over 250,000 per year
https://projects.propublica.or... [propublica.org]
NPR Form 990 - https://projects.propublica.or... [propublica.org]
With a name like "All Things Considered..." (Score:2)
They sure are brushing with a broad stroke. If they want to live up to their name, they better diversify.
Do they take all viewer requests? I for one would love to hear a detailed analysis about the mating habits of the three towed sloth. And with a name like "All Things Considered", they better deliver!
Re:With a name like "All Things Considered..." (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Three towed sloths have a three-way on the back of a tow truck?
Re: (Score:2)
Not sure it was "All Things Considered", but NPR did exactly that a couple days ago. There was much talk about the metabolic rate of the sloth but also a significant analysis of the mating procedure. Especially for you, they included some discussion of their toilet habits. There's probably a podcast of it somewhere.
sloth link here (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I like anything about sloths; and wolves.
BTW, it's toed, as in sloths have 3 toes, and fingers as well.
Oddly enough, the 2-toed sloth still has 3 toes but only has 2 fingers.
Also, can I use more commas, you can't use too many.
He must make "Dinosaurist discrimination" a thing (Score:5, Funny)
He just has to start a few campaigns, get some angry young people on board, get a few courses in Dinosaurism going at Universities, and before you know it there will be law requiring 10% of the NPR's budget to be spent on Dinosaur programs and the next VP will be chosen based on their Dinosauriness and not their merit.
Re: (Score:2)
We do not want to encourage more of the lizard people in politics, or we may end up with Zuckerberg winning an election next.
Re: (Score:1)
I would like to subscribe to your newsletter. :)
Dinosaur Senator (Score:5, Funny)
How many times did Senator and Dinosaur appear in the same search result?
Re: (Score:2)
294
Sorry kid (Score:5, Funny)
Can't spare air time for dinosaurs. Far to many obscure jazz 'musicians' need to remind us all how terrible their life has been in the US . That and urban grazing; it's absolutely necessary that we interview every wierdo urban grazer in the country first.
Re: (Score:1)
Ah, a Typical American Progressive :)
Re: (Score:3)
I'm sorry, I seem to have missed it. Where exactly did the GF post have a race listed?
Dinosaur age (Score:5, Funny)
Some schoolkids in the Museum of Natural History are marveling at some dinosaur bones. One boy, about 8, asks the guard, "Can you please tell me how old the dinosaur bones are?"
The guard replies, "They are 65,000,017 years old."
"That's an awfully exact number," says the boy. "How do you know their age so precisely?"
The guard answers, "Well, the dinosaur bones were sixty five million years old when I started working here, and that was seventeen years ago."
Re: (Score:2)
Like the classic story about advanced scouts. (Score:2)
It's like the classic story about advanced scouts. The commander sends soldier to scout out the enemy forces and report. They come back and report there was a force of 1002 men advancing to their position. The commander is impressed about the accuracy and asks how they counted them, so the soldier goes "well, there were a couple riding up front and I'd say like a thousand in the back".
News Media Twitter/Facebok Accounts must be BANNED (Score:2)
While these 'accuracy' jokes are funny, it is very sad that our professional news media journalists and even statistical pollsters do not understand accuracy. How many times are were presented with 'facts' that 45% of people think A & 35% of people think B, with the stated conclusion that more people think A. Well if accuracy/tolerant/error/margin of the numbers at +/-5%, than the two numbers are the SAME. 45-5=40 and 35+5=40. Their margin of error overlaps meaning there is NO DIFFERENCE.
Either the
Re: (Score:2)
women on average are not very interested in dinosaurs
And you are basing this comment on what, exactly? Because without actual data to make it a rigorous observation, it's simply sexist.
Males tend to be fascinated by large, powerful, and frightening-looking things.
Ok, I'm fairly certain we're solidly in the sexist statements realm here.
And there is an animal called a llama. I don't know what a "lama" is.
Slight correction (Score:1)
NPR's archivists found the word "dinosaur" appearing in stories 294 times in the show's history. By comparison, "senator" , a synonym for "dinosaur," has appeared 20,447 times. [ Emphasis added ]
There, fixed that for you.
This Kid is going places!!! (Score:1)
Finally we have a new Greta (Score:2)
The old one isn't cute anymore.
Re: (Score:2)
All Things Left of Center Considered... (Score:2)
Nothing Else.
Re: (Score:2)
The kid's right, of course . (Score:4, Informative)
I listen to PBS/NPR/BBC radio at various times of the day and they are all about politics and pandemic. The clickbait issues. Interviews with 'important' people who want reelection or publicity. And don't get me started on their fawning over athletes, actors, musicians and chefs. BBC isn't much better with about 30 percent of their news coming from Africa, 30% from the US, 10% sports, and 30% is just smalltalk. Almost nothing about the rest of the world.
But my real gripe is my own NPR station. They take in hundreds of millions as a result of their constant nagging for money. They use it for insipid stories about peoples' personal experience with the virus or heartbreaking cases of school withdrawal. Never, never, never do they explore corruption in the city by elected officials or local monopolies or others. We pay the highest electric bills in the country, but the privately owned utility is a major donor to the station, so the public is never informed. All the criminals donate and thus they will never be investigated.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah but let's face it, everything interesting about dinosaurs was dead and buried 60 million years ago.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Well, that's how they operate. They find one person affected by some issue and tell a sob story about them expecting their listeners to generalize to the whole which is what usually happens. They're usually wrong but that's beside the point. They have a narrative *cough*propaganda*cough to push. NPR in the late 70s and early 80s wasn't anywhere near as useless as it is today.
Re: (Score:2)
1. Fuck off!
2. This definitely falls under the News for Nerds category.
It's a web browser logo Re:Irrelevant (Score:1)
"Dinosaur" is code for "History of Mozilla Firefox" (old logo [wikimedia.org]).
The kid wants NPR to do more stories about web browsers from before he was born. In computer years, Mozilla was using that logo about, oh, 65 million years ago I think.
Interesting... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
The conservative station says man walked around with dinosaurs on the 6th day of creation...
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
You can actually hear this sort of thing on "Christian" *cough*fascist*cough* radio station WDCX at night, all about how man and dinosaur coexisted...
Re:Hmm.. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They've hammered for weeks that the Democrats always meant $2000 checks was $1400 + $600 when that literally never was discussed prior winning Georgia.
Obviously you weren't paying attention then to the discussions about the relief bill in December. The Republicans wanted to send out $600 cheques and the Democrats were seeking $2000 cheques. Once the Democrats agreed to compromise and accept the $600 cheques the discussion changed to speculation/talk that Biden wanted the $600 cheque bumped up to $2000 cheques once he was sworn in.
What’s the proposal to increase those checks?
New legislation already passed by the House could increase the full stimulus check amount to $2,000 (or $1,400 on top of the $600 already approved, for most people). The phaseout structure is still the same, but because the check itself is larger, people making up to $115,000 would still get something.
https://www.washingtonpost.com... [washingtonpost.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
NPR is good at trying to be fair and balance, even though they don't use those words in their slogan. The far left is unhappy with NPR for being too fair. That's NPR at the national stage, whereas local stations may have a much more left bent for their local coverage. The conservative senators Ted Stevens and John McCain were supporters of PBS and NPR. Of course, these days "conservative" has changed to mean "pro-Trump" rather than being an advocate for liberty, freedom, and fiscal accountability.
Re: (Score:2)
Even he didn't believe that man walked around with dinosaurs on the 6th day of creation. Maybe that's because he was an educated man who understood that the word translated as "day" could have been just as easily translated as something akin to "era", back in the day.
Those fools who believe that dinosaur
Re: (Score:2)
When She said "let there be light" ...it was the big bang but then photon and matter did not decouple for some time may be 40000 years
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
May be we should reinterpret the old testament with this yardstick.
Again we don't see kangaroos or llamas mentioned in the old testament or any Judeo-Christian-Islamic religion..pointing to the authors of the day can go so far in their scify imagination
no dude (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
You must be hearing it from some crypto-jewish fakeservative station, my station tells me that dinosaurs were put in the ground to test our faith and anyway they don't exist.
Re: (Score:2)
Nonsense! Dinosaurs were dragons, and they were not allowed on the Ark because everyone knows that the dragon is the servant of the devil!
On the other hand, no one seems able to explain why fleas and mosquitoes were allowed on board.
Re: (Score:2)
What superior non-neoliberal news outlet or podcast do you suggest?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
How is that worse than neoconservative bastard wagons of sycophantic garbage?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
You obviously didn't come to your opinion on NPR by listening to it. Anyone weaned on right-wing talk radio is going to find NPR fairly "neoliberal", but they have fairly balanced coverage of current events and a bunch of shows focused on stuff that most people wouldn't find interesting...unless they listened for a bit.
Whatever country you happen to be from, try listening to the another country's publicly funded radio stations. You will get a new perspective on the world, much more-so than listening to so
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Wasn't always that way, but Reagan's Badministration very publicly chastised them budgetarily for not being conservative enough. We almost lost public broadcasting. They try to walk that fine line between not pissing off the neo-cons too badly while at the same time trying not to lie.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What do you suggest as an alternative that's also fair and balanced?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
White male pissed because the white-male-dominated world he always was over-represented in is changing to a world where he will be just represented proportionnaly to his true percentage of the population.
How surprising.
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
Re: (Score:1)
thank you for taking the time to explain to us that you don't know what racism is.
Re: (Score:2)
Pretty sure that ZombieCatInABox's comment is the de facto definition of racism: "The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability" He made assumptions about my character and ability based on race. Dunno how better to explain this. How would you define racism that differs from the dictionary?
Re: (Score:2)
Assuming my entire worldview, history, and personality based on my skin color.
Not racism. It simply doesn't match the definition you linked. Your life experiences color your point of view. It's not a comment on your ability or even your character. Being naïve is not a slight against your ethnicity.
While no two people have exactly the same life experiences. There are experiences that are common enough to be shared by groups of people. Some of the life experiences that might be common among Black Americans is uncommon among White Americans. This shared experience leads to a group
Re: NPR busy being woke (Score:1)
If youâ(TM)re living in a western nation, youâ(TM)re probably not systematically oppressed. Doesnâ(TM)t matter the color of your skin or your gender or your history.
If you can identify a law or decree or memo that instructs the government to treat you different based on the color of your skin, then that is systematic oppression. To my knowledge, no such laws are in place today anywhere in the West.
If you are suggesting we put in place laws that specifically target people of a particular skin
Re: (Score:2)
If you can identify a law or decree or memo that instructs the government to treat you different based on the color of your skin, then that is systematic oppression
That's an overly narrow definition, and I don't agree with it. De facto practices in our institutions are relevant, and were the impetus for civil rights legislation in the United States.
If you are suggesting we put in place laws that specifically target people of a particular skin color, to fix whatever you presume ails that group of people
that's already done.
then that would be systematic racism
how so?
Do you disagree with the principle, that it's somehow two wrongs trying to make a right? Or are you denying that there is racial discriminations in our government, business, economy, and society? I'd love for this racism horseshit to be over, hang out the Mission Accomplished banners, and have a p
Re: (Score:1)
You'll have a hard time proving what you say by good statistics. The consequences for white and Asian criminals are higher in general.
De-facto practices such as what? Because they are all illegal and people make good money if they find a vestige of it. The impetus for civil rights legislation was de jure practices, the government(s) had different lines and signs up for different races, or slavery and different vote counting (2/3rd compromise) which was all legislative.
I disagree with the principle. It is tw
Re: (Score:1)
That being said, what about my definition of racism above warranted your mean comment that I "don't know what racism is"?
Re: (Score:2)