Americans Are Consuming More Foreign Content than Ever (axios.com) 215
Content from abroad is boosting its share of the American entertainment diet, thanks in large part to streaming, the pandemic and the creator economy. From a report: "As 'American exceptionalism' has become less of a truth geopolitically, the same goes for entertainment," says Brad Grossman, founder and CEO of ZEITGUIDE. The U.S. demand share for non-U.S. content was higher each quarter in 2020 than in the previous two years, according to data provided to Axios from Parrot Analytics, which measures demand for entertainment content "This trend started in mid 2019, so it pre-dates COVID-19, but the strong upward trend has continued into 2020," says Wade Payson-Denney, an insights analyst at Parrot. In Q3 2020, non-U.S. shows accounted for nearly 30% of demand in the U.S. The data shows that U.S. audiences are discovering content from previously unfamiliar markets, like India, Spain and Turkey. The top 5 international markets in the U.S. by Q4 2020 were the U.K. (8.3%), Japan (5.7%), Canada (3.2%), Korea (1.9%), and India (1.5%), per Parrot.
American exceptionalism' has become less of a .. (Score:2, Insightful)
"American exceptionalism' has become less of a truth"
I was going to write a rant that that is something an American would say, talking the place up... but it is true.
Religious crazy people, extremism, racism, incarceration of citizens, gun ownership, bad health care for a rich country, wealth divide etc etc.
"Merica is exceptional, and as soon as Americans realise it, the better.
Re:American exceptionalism' has become less of a . (Score:5, Insightful)
The reason americans are consuming more non-US material is because people have access to it. We have hit the threshold where almost all people own a roku or something similar.
The lockdowns forced people to have more time on their hands. Hollywood did not release or produce their usual amount of crap, and there was no real sports this year.
The more adventurous went to other parts of Netflix and Amazon video and realized that there is some decent stuff out there, and started to look around in their Roku for more.
Re: (Score:3)
Re:American exceptionalism' has become less of a . (Score:5, Insightful)
> It might also be Americans looking to see if there is ANY content out there that isn't constantly trying to shove WOKE content down their throats....
Exactly. In recent years hollywood has become so hyper politicized that storytelling has fallen away to be replaced by a predictable series of stale state propaganda points. Its almost but not quite as thick as china produced content.
Its so formulaic and repetitive that it is failing as entertainment - in the same way that communist countries failed to produce entertainment due to overbearing propaganda departments.
People are flocking to foreign content because it is not burdened with hyper PC quotas and content, or at least is filled with unfamiliar ones that the viewers dont recognize as clearly.
Re: (Score:3)
The remake of Ghostbusters comes to mind when they had to do an all female version, and I think the other night, maybe after the superbowl, they now have female Queen Latifa as the Equalizer...who has as far as I Know..always been male.
Why not come up with NEW and exciting characters that are female or xyz "under represented" race rather than try to rewrite history and canno
Re: (Score:2)
Some truth to it, but foreign content has been available for years depending on the market one lived in. Especially Spanish related.
Re: (Score:2)
> because people have access to it.
Exactly this! Gee, who knew that people would watch foreign films if they are available!
This bullshit policy of geoblocking stops income and drives people to piracy. It needs to stop. I _want_ to watch more movies outside my geo region, am willing to pay for it, but can't due to business short sightedness??? What kind of business turns away customers???
I have no problems watching foreign movies IF they are available!
For example, a few years back I watched Hawaizaada [netflix.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Fine by me.
Re:American exceptionalism' has become less of a . (Score:4, Insightful)
And yet, it remains one of the best nations on the planet.
You really need to get a passport.
Re: (Score:3)
I have a passport issued not by the US government.
Since the 1960s the rate of US legal resident population born abroad has tripled, the rate of US natives living abroad hasn't changed.
Do you think the entirety of South America and recently even Asia are misguided when they try to enter the country illegally? If you really think America is bad, why do you support open borders and encourage foreigners to come here?
Re: (Score:2)
And yet, it remains one of the best nations on the planet. ... This is the problem with utopians. They do not see what base level of human existence is at current technological level, but utopia that only exists in their imaginations.
A rare selfawarewolf spotted?
Re: (Score:2)
I wish you had reading comprehension. Alas...
Re: (Score:2)
Wolves have been in Europe for 10,000s of years, so they predate human history in Europe. I think that makes them native to Europe, even though they were exterminated from a lot of European areas in the last 500 years or so.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, that's the propaganda line for last thirty or so years, alongside the "wolves don't predate on humans" and other similar anti-factual nonsense. In reality, wolves are Siberian natives, and a very poor fit for European ecology. Even here in Finland, where we have Taiga-type forests covering most of the country like those that wolves are native in, they're still severely depleting biodiversity when a pack migrates to an area because of difference in ecology. It's why they have to keep migrating around, e
Re: (Score:3)
Don't you hate it when people use their time machine to try and show that wolves were in Europe thousands of years ago?
According to the fossil record, the wolf C. lupus ssp. appeared in Europe around 800 thousand years ago (kya) during the Middle Pleistocene and in the mid-latitudes of North America around 100 kya, where its ancestor previously had gone extinct (Wang et al., 2010). The wolf appears to have been well-established in Europe from around 400 kya and onwards (Meloro et al., 2007). Older records are known only from Siberia and Alaska (Beringia), leading to the assumption that wolves originated somewhere in this region, whence they spread all across the Holarctic (Wang et al., 2010).
https://www.frontiersin.org/ar... [frontiersin.org]
Re: (Score:2)
This is a rare case of good feedback on writing style on slashdot. Could you please be more specific on what makes you think it becomes a "rant" rather than a natural progression of narrative within the post. And what part of it you find to be worth being considered a "troll"?
Re: (Score:3)
It is when you consider the unique nature of America and how it functions. Here in Finland, we have among the least police and least incarceration in the world. And then we ran into the problem of having non-native ethnicities. And discovered for several ethnicities, criminality is over ten times that of natives of similar social standing, and that unlike our criminals, they respond very poorly to rehabilitation. Our first attempt to compensate was to train people from their ethnicity as police officers.
Tha
Re: Cue all the whaddabout China morons. (Score:3)
What about China? :D
They've got assholes too!
. . .
Netflix is all Scandinavian now (Score:3)
I don't know what I did in terms of watching to end up with an all foreign language detective profile, but all my Netflix suggestions are:
- Trapped, Icelandic murder mystery
- The Break
- Swedish Dicks
- La Mante
- The Forest
- Deadwind, Love those Finnish mysteries
- Dogs of Berlin
I'm guessing that the lack of new local programming is bringing up these "Netflix Originals" as suggestions to keep me from looking elsewhere.
But it ain't working.
Re: (Score:2)
If you have it, I'd recommend Comrade Detective (on Amazon). It's only 6 episodes, and relatively cheaply made, and pretty cheesy, but it was created in the soviet era (latterly dubbed with american accents - would have been better with local accents, IMHO).
It's essentially an american style cop show, but supposedly made into propaganda. It feels like the writers had watched a few and were really trying to make a hard-hitting cop show, but knew they had to play the party game so threw in a few lines to keep
Re: (Score:2)
Interestingly I haven't seen or even heard of most of these. But a couple or recent Netflix shows have been from all over the place, and mostly very good:
The Spy
Fauda
Kalifat
Lupin
language can be a bit of a spoiler (Score:2)
Subtitles may not be a big issue for the occasional foreign feature film, the foreign language may even add to the experience, but I would assume the situation is a bit different for many people with more mundane entertainment content.
Constantly having to read subtitles can be a bit tedious, and on all shows I have watched, the dubbing -if available at all- is horrible. That's to be expected to some degree I guess, high quality dubbing is difficult and expensive and most of these shows have a tight budget
Re:language can be a bit of a spoiler (Score:5, Funny)
Your comic books contain nothing but subtitles you have to read.
Re: (Score:2)
I so wish I had mod points for this comment :)
Re: (Score:3)
You have all the time you want to read them, though. Unlike a movie or TV show.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Please, grow the fuck up.
People all over the planet have managed to enjoy content with subtitles for decades. You'll be fine.
Re:language can be a bit of a spoiler (Score:5, Interesting)
It's interesting that in many genres, people grow to hate dubs for that exact reason. It tends to be "localised" and in anglosphere has absolutely horrible voice actors on top of it.
Of the "Japan" chunk on that pie chart, a significant amount of content is subbed specifically because voice actors in Japan tend to be of high quality in part because of huge dubbing industry. You can actually make a really good living being a voice actor there. Which in turn leads to horrible comparison between that and US dub voice actors, ending in a situation where many if not most people end up preferring subtitles with original foreign voice actors.
Because voice is also needed for things like accents and intonations which are very comprehensible regardless of language in which they are used. Hence original top notch foreign talent being better with subtitles than low quality English one.
Same thing exists in many other non-Anglosphere nations, to the point where big name Hollywood actors end up having the same voice actor playing them across movies.
P.S. Fun anecdote to look up if you want to know more is a story about how Germans chose to use another actor to voice act as Arnold Schwarzenegger in Terminator in spite of him being a native speaker and available for the dub. I won't spoil it, but it's a genuinely interesting and funny story. Google it.
Re: (Score:2)
P.S. Fun anecdote to look up if you want to know more is a story about how Germans chose to use another actor to voice act as Arnold Schwarzenegger in Terminator in spite of him being a native speaker and available for the dub. I won't spoil it, but it's a genuinely interesting and funny story. Google it.
What kind of accent did they use for the Terminator dub? Just using a mainstream German accent wouldn't seem to fit. Maybe a German speaker with a Russian accent?
Re: (Score:2)
No, Japanese plots contain dialogue that can't be directly translated to English, because it wouldn't have meaning without explanation. You can't dub it without dumbing-down or changing the plot.
Only neckbeards want a dumbed-down story. Same for Korean.
American voice actors make a lot of money, too; many A-list actors also do voice acting.
Re: (Score:2)
>Japanese plots contain dialogue that can't be directly translated to English, because it wouldn't have meaning without explanation.
This is true for all languages that represent sufficiently different cultures. Japanese make a great example because of remoteness of their culture in relationship to anglosphere cultures, but it also applies to other cultures who may be less divergent (and as a result, more directly translatable in terms of linguistics). They'll still have dialogue and plot points that cann
Re: (Score:2)
One thing I really like about some fansubs is that they'll include translation notes. I wish professional outlets would follow suit.
Re: (Score:2)
Das Boot (Score:3)
The (original) German submarine movie, was shot in German and English (the actors all spoke both languages). So not really dubbed.
But apparently, the German version with English subtitles was more popular in the USA. Felt more authentic.
Re: (Score:2)
Or as a Flemish friend said to me: nobody else speaks our language, so we learn to speak there's. He was learning his fifth language (Spanish) at the time just for fun. Truly multi-lingual in English and French, and I'm sure his German was damn good too.
Re: language can be a bit of a spoiler (Score:2)
Dubbing is only unusual in the US because usually it wasn't necessary, as content was made in the English language to begin with.
Over here, the broadcasting networks themselves pay for good dubbing, so the original shows usually don't have to. So it does not matter if the show is small. It only matters id the network wants to be successful with it.
This is no different for Netflix & co.
It's just that is seems Netflix didn't realize the amount of work involved with actually being a TV network for the enti
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting that language has come up as the main differentiating feature. I see the difference as cultural. Different cultures view their worlds in different ways & tell different stories about them. I think perhaps that's why people are willing to put up with the inconvenience of the language barrier. To see the world through the eyes of people from other cultures.
And yes, Australian, British, Canadian, New Zealand, etc. films & TV shows are foreign. They have very different cultures & differe
Are they really? (Score:4, Informative)
First off, Canada is cheating. Americans have watched "Canadian" content for years. Because Canada tends to be cheaper to film in, low budget TV is frequently filmed in Canada.
Secondly, calling UK content "foreign content" is technically correct but it's not very foreign, being in the same language and all. There's also a surprising amount of "technically BBC but filmed for an American audience" stuff out there. (For example, Killing Eve is technically a BBC show. Except it was produced by BBC America which is actually AMC. It aired first in the US despite being "British.")
The article also mentions the other caveat: a lot of "foreign" content being watched isn't quite so much "foreign" as it is "produced by a company that's technically not part of a giant American conglomerate but just so happens to be owned by the same people and exclusively produces content for American companies." So, sure, it's technically foreign, in that it was shot outside the US and used a foreign film crew. But it was paid for by US companies and designed for a US audience and, sometimes, starring US actors with foreign actors left in the background.
Big surprise (Score:4, Insightful)
There are only so many comic book "hero" movies you can watch till you puke.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Yeah no kidding.
I've always wondered whether Americans actually *want* to see the shit they watch or whether they don't know no better. Now that they are getting exposed to foreign content, they might just being to realize what awful mindless tripe their domestic entertainment providers feed them.
Re: Big surprise (Score:2)
Oh trust me, Americans don't want that stuff either. It was fun in the beginning. But it has gotten ridiculous. Anyone can see that offering something different to Americans is /the/ market opportunity right now.
Re: (Score:2)
Most Americans don't even watch any of the "shows."
10M viewers is a really super popular show, but there are 330M Americans.
The 2015 Superbowl had 114M viewers, that's the record. The final episode of M*A*S*H, in 1983, had 105M, and that is the only non-Superbowl in the top 30.
By percent of households, the top was that M*A*S*H episode at 60%. In the top 30 alltime by percent of households, the most recent that wasn't a Superbowl was 1994 Winter Olympics (Ladies' singles). The most recent fictional show on t
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Big surprise (Score:4, Interesting)
Because it seems wokeness is pervading everything in newer content being produced today.
Hell, all Super Bowl day, which you'd think would be chiefly about the game and interspersed with the traditional funny commercials....had woke content all through the day, and I think I saw only 1 funny commercial that wasn't trying to push or promote an agenda.
Oh...I guess there was a little football talk in there but only out of necessity.
Hell, even after the game, you had idiots out there tweeting that Tom Brady winning was somehow racist.
I dunno WTF happend to the US and when my country fundamentally changed underneath me and common fucking sense went out the window.
I think I miss comedy the most....as that now, anyone says anything funny about someone else....there is an immediately backlash from a small but VERY LOUD minority of offended people that will not only shut them down, but cancel culture their entire livelihoods and go after relatives and friends.
But back to subject...in the US, it seems if you watch any new content....you cannot avoid it.
I've virtually given up watching anything on TV, except a bit of the local news to catch the weather.
Other than that, I'm watching reruns of shows from the 60's-80's for the most part. Maybe some 90's too.
I used to be a news junkie, but I can't watch that shit anymore. I just got tired of getting hoarse shouting "Fuck You" at the TV and then realized it wasn't doing anyone any good, so, I just turned it off.
Re: (Score:2)
So true. I thought I am the only one who feels that way, though, considering how widespread that crap has become nowadays.
Re: (Score:2)
So true. I thought I am the only one who feels that way
I also hate superhero movies.
I enjoyed the original Ironman because he was a nerd who got laid, something we all fantasize about. His powers were based on technology, not magic.
I don't mind the moves with one superhero.
But the "team" moves about the Avengers or whoever, make me want to vomit. Thor and Ironman do not belong in the same movie.
As a general rule, the films I hate the most are the biggest hits. So maybe the Hollywood studios can hire me as a consultant and do the opposite of everything I tell
Re: Big surprise (Score:2)
You would make a great Dogbert!
Re: (Score:2)
I don't hate the superhero movies; I just find them mostly boring. The more meaningless action they have, the more boring they are, the bigger hits they become.
Re: (Score:2)
There are only so many comic book "hero" movies you can watch till you puke.
I used to like movies based on comic books. But I haven't seen any for years due to Marvel overload...
Re: (Score:2)
What's even worse is that if you read comic books back in the 80s like I did, then this shit is a repeat of stuff you grew bored of 30+ years ago. Its like movies have reverted.
Re: (Score:2)
Absolutely! How DARE other people enjoy a genre that you don't like.
Suggestion: Don't watch superhero movies if you don't want to.
Eh (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:EWWWWWW (Score:2)
In the US we have one station that produces content for adults: PBS. The UK alone has far more content of that quality.
I guess it was inevitable that someone would say that, but, serious, that garbage makes me want to puke. You may as well say something like, "The UK along has asparagus, broccoli*, and brussel's sprouts--aka pod people--of that 'quality'. 99% of the crap on PBS and BBC even people in the UK don't want to watch but are forced to pay for thorugh taxes anyway.
*Albert Broccoli and his family being noteworthy exceptions
Re: EWWWWWW (Score:2)
And yet, he's right.
That's the worst part. At least probably for you.
Yes, it makes you want to puke. But that is the real reaaon why. (It triggered you.)
Re: (Score:2)
Americans consume content at a rate higher than the American entertainment industry can/will produce.
That is basically true for every nation/region - especially if you focus on smaller genres like SF etc.
Re: Eh (Score:2)
A lot, though not all of it might be to your taste.
Re: (Score:2)
People are forgetting foreign stations on cable (usually Spanish since America has a lot of Spanish speakers) and the availability of dishes (no, not DishTV). I remember watching Canadian TV for example.
Re: (Score:3)
I dunno, I think the UK, or at least The BBC is about as Politically Correct conscious as the whole US media market is getting.
Hell, The BBC would never have Monty Python on today if it were a new show.
Re: Eh (Score:2)
Just to note: You would have had a good point without that "OMGtuhprogressiveleft" nonsense.
Yes, the USA creates moe content than ever. ... conservative. ;)
And yes, it is mostly just squeezing the same old "i.p." some more and the same old tired tropes. Because the Content Mafia has gone all paranoid since file sharing emerged, and don't want to risk anything new anymore. They have become quite
Re: (Score:2)
Meanwhile, it's actually China of all things that is currently saving Hollywood majors from fate shared by the rest. In that they do not allow progressive leftist dogma in anything shown domestically. And since Hollywood majors want their production to be licensed for viewing in PRC, they limit, reduce in visibility and straight up remove baizuo content where they can.
Which means they have to do traditional hero archetypes to appeal to that audience and to avoid CCP sensors. Which in turn makes their movies
Re: (Score:2)
I unironically can. I grew up in the worst neighbourhood in my country, and among people I had to fight as a teenager were the black block types. I have at least one scar that I know came from encounter with them.
Re: (Score:2)
Line of Duty and No Offence are great. Bodyguard was ok.
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks, I will track them down.
Re: (Score:2)
Acorn TV carries a lot of UK content.
https://acorn.tv/ [acorn.tv]
Re: (Score:2)
Sure, but what I mean is that most of it is crap. What shows are good?
One thing I've noticed (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You didn't notice American Tv (eg. CSI) went metric in about 2007. Real scientists have been using metric for 45 years and the US military (and NATO) adopted metres, via MGRS, in the 1950s although the rest of the US government didn't adopt metres, via USNG, until 2001-2005. It's about time US people joined the rest of the world.
Yet, the USA was the second country (beaten by Russia) to have centesimal (AKA decimal) currency.
Re: One thing I've noticed (Score:2)
As a SI/"metric" guy: The thing is: Units of measurement are arbitrary anyway. The king's foot is as good a yardstick as any.
The problem with "Imperial" units is that they aren't decimalized. If there was a centiyard (inch-like) or a kiloinch or whatever, converting would just a movement of the decimal point. Thar makes a lot of math so much easier.
But "Imperial" units are more focused on fractions. Which is another thing that is very convenient in practical use. Something that the base 10 of the SI is not
Re: (Score:3)
Decimalized is most certainly not the main problem.
But the interconnection of the measurements is.
What is the water pressure in 10m depth? If you need to google that you have not grasped the SI system.
Re: (Score:2)
That only works if you round gravity from 9.8m/s to 10 though. :P As kg of water is defined with gravity acceleration of 9.8m/s^2.
Nope
A lot of the SI wouldn't work as "easy" on Mars or the Moon.
Regarding air pressure yes, but otherwise they would.
Re: One thing I've noticed (Score:2)
A metre being one 10,000,000th of the distance from the North Pole to the equator is not arbitrary in the same way as a kings foot is. A gram being the mass of one cubic centimetre of water is way less arbitary than a pound being 7000 Troy grains, with a grain being a mythical ideal grain of cereal.
Re: (Score:2)
It is rather arbitrary, the planet is its size due to random chance. What is great about a meter it is reproducible answer with the technology of its time. Now that a meter is defined by a resonate frequency it is rather cheap trivial for someone to have a both a meter and and second defined by electronics in a low end lab.
Re: (Score:2)
Plus the plethora of inconsistent measurements for the same thing. Not counting when I have to convert to and from SI, in my work I often use:
Feet, inches, fractions of an inch - often all three combined in one measurement.
Cubic feet, cubic inches, gallons
Miles per hour, fee
Probably not by choice (Score:2, Flamebait)
Re: (Score:2)
I dunno, some of the best movies I've seen in the last couple of years have been foreign. Maybe they paid peanuts to get them on netflix but that doesn't mean they're bad. Back when I had satellite the best shows all tended to be on the Independent Film Channel, many of which were also foreign. American cinema and television is really lousy; of course most foreign stuff is too, but it also means that it's a very low bar for an above average foreign offering to be extremely good relative the the average Ame
Re: Probably not by choice (Score:2)
I disagree that American movies/shows are lousy. Most nowadays is lousy, yes. But as a foreigner, remember that until recently, *most* good stuff we watched over here, *also* came from you guys. You can definitely produce amazing content.
Re: Probably not by choice (Score:2)
*cries in Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency* (The one with Frodo as main character, that sadly went over most people's heads, and was canceled because the main creator was accused (not convicted!) of sexual harassment by the usual cancel culture.)
Re: (Score:2)
The claims that it was cancelled because the creator was accused of sexual assault are overblown. The Hollywood Reporter (about as good a source as you're likely to get for such things) attributes it to declining viewership [hollywoodreporter.com]. The tie to the sexual assault allegations against the creator seem to boil down to "post hoc ergo propter hoc" - not the most convincing argument.
It was an absolutely terrible fit for a weekly broadcast on network television because of how hard it is to break into the show if you mis
Consuming More Foreign Content? (Score:2)
Give it a rest already. Do we really need yet another story about how there’s no actual beef in Taco Bell’s beef tacos?
US content is ...... (Score:2, Insightful)
....flashy, slick and generally big budget, but unsophisticated.
Foreign content is generally a lot more raw, no huge CGI scenes and explosions, actors might not all have perfect teeth and full heads of hair no mayyer their age...but is much better at storytelling.
Re: US content is ...... (Score:2)
I predict a US indie movie culture to grow from this. A new wave, so to speak.
Just like you grew a craft beer culture, and, hipsterism aside, got some really good beers now. I say that as a German.
Re: (Score:2)
At least the hipsters have moved on to sours. Now those of us who actually enjoy IPAs can drink them in peace.
Re: (Score:2)
Tired formulas (Score:5, Insightful)
I, with some initial reluctance, started watching a few mainstream Korean Dramas/Shows a year and a half ago. I had been afraid they'd be similar to the few Japanese dramas which were always super hammy, but I was pleasantly surprised.
If many Americans are looking to foreign content nowadays then there is a good chance it's because of the same feeling I got from the Korean shows -- freshness. Having grown up in the US and seen at least 100 TV shows here, you eventually get burned out on the formula's that get used here. These foreign shows also have their own formulas that they rely on when building shows/stories, but their formulas born out of partially their own culture. So what you end up with is something that's very novel.
A good example I found was in the Crime/Detective genre. The US like's their "mystery" to be wrapped up in a single episode but I found that many Korean shows like to solve the current "mystery" in an episode and then start the next one in the last 15-20 minutes of the episode and pick up in the next episode. This creates a feeling (to me anyway) that there is a progressive storyline in the show. The US TV market has slowly progressed to more narrative driven shows as time has gone on in part thanks to the DVR.
I think the final key thing in this whole "More Americans watching foreign content" is simply that there is a nice backlog of really good shows overseas. If you pick a country like the UK or Korea, and you've never watched anything from there before, then you have at least 50 TV shows you could pick from that are award winning shows on par with stuff like The Wire, GoT, etc. Depending on how fast/slow you consume that content, you could easily have a few years worth of content to get through.
You're not alone (Score:2)
Everyone on the planet has watched everything Netflix et al are offering.
Re: You're not alone (Score:2)
Nah. No Netflix in this household.
I'm not paying criminal leeches. I'm only paying actual creators.
Re: (Score:2)
Does "everything" include the DVD library, because most people forget that part of the company. People have become streaming-myopic in that if it's not streamed over the internet it doesn't exist.
Good (Score:2)
Then they will realize that there aren't that many monsters out there and people everywhere are just people.
We're not enemies. Don't let any propaganda or terrorist convince you otherwise.
Second? (Score:2)
I would have thought Japan would have been first on the list despite the language barrier.
After all, WEEEEBS!
This surprises? (Score:2)
With all the "shelter-in-place" orders (no, no where in the US had real lockdowns), people who normally watch the latest season of, "Real Housewives..." (or whatever replaced it), Survivor, and whatever else they watch these days had nothing to watch after they finished their previous seasons and there were no 2020 seasons for them to binge through. All the back catalogs of foreign shows exist and it's far easier tracked these days.
Seems lots of people have lots of free time (Score:2)
Due To Netflix? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Naturally. When Hollywood basically left Netflix to start up their own money making streaming service. e.g. Disney that left a big hole and Netflix's own original content being slim (DVD library notwithstanding) they took up a lot of anime and other foreign content.
Re: (Score:2)
Finnish (Score:2)
For many years... (Score:2)
Been watching British shows for many years (Doctor Who, Misfits, Shameless), and more recently Australian (Tomorrow People, Spellbinder, Sea Patrol), Columbian (Sempre Bruja), Spanish (Elite), Korean (Cinderella and the Four Knights). Always subtitled non-english shows, as voice dubbing is nearly always really awful.
Re:As long as they are in English (Score:4, Funny)
Because USAins cannot into foreign lingos
Sorry what foreign lingo was that? Google translate was no help.
Re: As long as they are in English (Score:2)
He doesn't want to say "Americans" for "US Americans" and hasn't heard of "'Muristan" either. :D
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
If are such a person and you dared to step outside of your safe space and let yourself being confronted by the actual reality of the planet we're living on, and not only the one that exists in your head, you'd recognize that pretty much the rest of the world is even further to Left than what you might think is Left.
For one, the US is often not depi
Re: Difficult to believe (Score:2)
No, everywhere is ALSO America. They just don't know it (yet). ;) ... sometimes war". :D
But they all got "Coca-Cola,
Re: (Score:2)