Disney+ Added Content Disclaimers to 18 Episodes of 'The Muppet Show' (avclub.com) 379
118 episodes of Jim Henson's classic TV series The Muppet Show are now streaming on Disney+, writes the AV Club — but 18 episodes now begin with a content disclaimer...
The text of the disclaimers, which cannot be skipped past and include little 12-second timers so you know that you have to sit through them, explain that the episodes feature "negative depictions and/or mistreatment of people or cultures," and while "these stereotypes were wrong then and are wrong now," Disney has decided to leave them in order to "acknowledge the [content's] harmful impact, learn from it, and spark conversation to create a more inclusive future together..."
The disclaimer-worthy stuff includes Johnny Cash performing in front of a confederate flag in his episode and the brief appearance of a puppet dressed as a stereotypical Native American (referred to as an "Indian") in the Jim Nabors episode.
MovieWeb adds: Putting a disclaimer on the show is not a new practice at Disney+. The streamer had previously put disclaimers at the start of several classic animated movies, warning viewers about "outdated cultural depictions." Last month, Disney+ took it a step further by pulling many of these movies from kids' profiles, such as Dumbo, Peter Pan, Lady and the Tramp, and The Jungle Book. The titles are still available to watch on adult profiles with a disclaimer.
To celebrate their arrival on Disney+ the Muppets spliced themselves into posters parodying other TV shows, including The Mandalorian.
But MovieWeb also notes reports that two Muppet Show episodes from season 5 also had to be removed — and another episode heavily edited — due to trouble securing the music rights, "something that also prevented most of the series from getting released on home video for years."
The disclaimer-worthy stuff includes Johnny Cash performing in front of a confederate flag in his episode and the brief appearance of a puppet dressed as a stereotypical Native American (referred to as an "Indian") in the Jim Nabors episode.
MovieWeb adds: Putting a disclaimer on the show is not a new practice at Disney+. The streamer had previously put disclaimers at the start of several classic animated movies, warning viewers about "outdated cultural depictions." Last month, Disney+ took it a step further by pulling many of these movies from kids' profiles, such as Dumbo, Peter Pan, Lady and the Tramp, and The Jungle Book. The titles are still available to watch on adult profiles with a disclaimer.
To celebrate their arrival on Disney+ the Muppets spliced themselves into posters parodying other TV shows, including The Mandalorian.
But MovieWeb also notes reports that two Muppet Show episodes from season 5 also had to be removed — and another episode heavily edited — due to trouble securing the music rights, "something that also prevented most of the series from getting released on home video for years."
Disney's version of NC-17... (Score:4, Insightful)
Dumbo, Peter Pan, Lady and the Tramp, and The Jungle Book.
But yeah, there's no such thing as going overboard on incorporating wokeness, just like Kennedy's fine Star Wars productions.
Re: Disney's version of NC-17... (Score:5, Informative)
They actually have a lot of stuff that's only visible on "adult" profiles -- Spider-Man '88, most (but not all) Darkwing Duck, Some 1930s shorts -- which is why my daughter's profile isn't used anymore, because she has to go through my profile to watch the Spider-Man "Lizard, Lizard Everywhere" episode for the 80th time.
Re: Disney's version of NC-17... (Score:5, Insightful)
All that filtering and unskippable items also feeds piracy - you rarely see the useless stuff on pirated content.
Pirated content exists because the hurdles to get the legal content are inserted.
- Different release dates in different regions.
- Voiceovers.
- Unskippable content.
- Sub-quality sound/video because my equipment won't support the latest anti-piracy measures.
- Excessive pricing.
- Tracking where your privacy is invaded.
- Risk of losing your purchased content. Has happened before when a media store service is discontinued.
- DRM in general.
However some 'anti virus' software now nukes pirated content you have downloaded. Google Chrome has a background service that does that. So you have to consider using a 'clean' computer for your shared stuff. Somewhere along the line the cure that antivirus software provide has started to be worse than the disease.
Re: Disney's version of NC-17... (Score:5, Insightful)
I haven't bought a movie on DVD/BluRay for...geez...at least 15 years. The experience is just horrible, most especially the unskippable commercials and previews. Pirated movies are just...the movies. Just the content. As for streaming services and online media libraries, I'm not even tempted, for all the reasons you list. Plus: the prices are nuts, unless you watch a lot of movies/TV.
I have used music streaming services, including paid ones, but ultimately I'd rather support artists directly. When I want to sample an new artist, I'll stream a few songs to see what they're like, and then buy their music directly. Yesterday, I tried YouTube Music for the first time. Ouch. I thought other free services were annoying, but they've turned the dial to eleven: YouTube Music has a commercial literally after every single song. Is there some sort of race to the bottom?
Re: (Score:3)
I haven't bought a movie on DVD/BluRay for...geez...at least 15 years. The experience is just horrible, most especially the unskippable commercials and previews.
Blu-ray, sure, never owned one. But DVDs? DVDs haven't had unskippable content since 1999 (thanks Jon!)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Blu-rays haven't had unskippable content since MakeMKV was developed.
It's a much better experience to buy the disc (top-quality video), convert it to
mkv, put the disc away for safe keeping, and play it off the nas with a $20 wifi streaming device with VLC on it.
At this point I find 1-2 movies a year that are worth a second viewing so the cost is minimal.
Re: Disney's version of NC-17... (Score:5, Informative)
The only stuff Google Chrome nukes is know malware that attacks Google Chrome. It does not delete your pirated media. I should know, I've never had it delete anything and 90% of what I used Chrome to upload to YouTube Music was pirated.
Re: (Score:3)
It avoids their profiling and ensures we still have it after it is inevitably pulled out of rotation, also will usually have crap like warnings and such edited out.
Re: Disney's version of NC-17... (Score:4, Insightful)
"Darkwing Duck"
Let me guess- all of the slapstick and cartoon violence.
Growing up in the 80s, I watched the old Tom and Jerry, with all of the violence and racial sterotypes, on BROADCAST TV.
Somehow I didn't turn into a raging na zi.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Disney's version of NC-17... (Score:5, Funny)
What is offensive in Dumbo??
The stereotypically-black crows.
Re:Disney's version of NC-17... (Score:4, Interesting)
The issue is that a stereotypically-x can be found almost anywhere you look, especially in visual media. I'm not black but I recall the crows being my favorite characters. In this case I gotta go with this critic [ferris.edu]:
Re:Disney's version of NC-17... (Score:5, Insightful)
a professor at a low-end university in Michigan
Nice ad-hom there. You know it does not matter if the guy is prof at a low end university, the chair of the English department at Oxford, or anyone else for his assessment to be entirely correct.
People that have a problem with the crows in dumbo are pathetic little scolds who are utterly incapable of seeing the good or humanity in any bit of art. Its their opinions that are of no value; quite independent of whatever credentials they may hold.
The circus is gone - its the past. Everything their has its time and place. The thing about sterotypes is they fall into to categorizes - malicious inventions and relatively correct portraits of the majority of folks in some kind of group in a time or place. The crows are fine example - yes they display some culture and social position that was typical of the time for a certain group (reality) but they are depicted as capable, kind, and virtuous! The crows are friends you'd want to have, company you'd want to keep, unless you are racist a-hole that spends their time judging people (or are for that matter) on very superficial matters.
Its like Huck Fin, elements of Jim's character are the product of his world. He might be ignorant (because he has been kept so) but he isn't stupid or foolish. He takes a lot of abuse but he isn't abusive, he is in actual fact too good for all that. He deserves better and you are supposed to be smart enough to take that away from the book. If it portray the subjection of Jim as the way things ought to be or even just the natural order of things it might be objectionable but it does not do so it portrays it as a grave injustice.
Just like message of Dumbo is great message for Children. Sure the crows may look different from you but they are not to be feared, disliked, or rejected for that you should give them a chance and get to know them for who they actually are; they just might be the best friends you'll ever make. Imagine if we judge People not by the color of their skin but by the content of their character, and art not by the superficial details but by the message they work seeks to send!
Re: Disney's version of NC-17... (Score:2)
Re:Disney's version of NC-17... (Score:5, Informative)
A few things, but the most obvious are the racist stereotypes. The crows are an obvious minstrel show with exaggerated black voices. The song black people sing also includes minstrel-show stereotypes:
Hike! Ugh! Hike! Ugh! Hike! Ugh! Hike!
We work all day, we work all night
We never learned to read or write
We’re happy-hearted roustabouts
Hike! Ugh! Hike! Ugh! Hike! Ugh! Hike!
When other folks have gone to bed
We slave until we’re almost dead
We’re happy-hearted roustabouts
Hike! Ugh! Hike! Ugh! Hike! Ugh! Hike!
We don’t know when we get our pay
And when we do, we throw our pay away
(When we get our pay, we throw our money all away)
Peter Pan has racist stereotypes of Indians ("redskins"), Lady and the Tramp has Anti-Asian stereotypes and basically is from the "Mike Tyson's Punch Out" school of stereotyping, Jungle Book (weakest example) has lazy apes singing dixieland jazz songs. Not listed: Song of the South, for showing how happy slaves were, among other things.
Re:Disney's version of NC-17... (Score:4, Interesting)
Now, if you could see Song of the South, you could analyze and criticize it. I saw it as a child, when it was shown in theaters. It was enjoyable, because I was focusing on the happy aspects, and was growing up in a far northern state with very few non-whites around me. I had no reason to see the other parts at the time.
Having obtained the video of it about a decade ago, I tried to watch it. I could not watch much of it.
Re: (Score:3)
You can see it. It's here on archive.org: https://archive.org/details/So... [archive.org]
Restored in 1080p. Stream or download, no DRM.
It's pretty shocking these days. At the time though it was actually pretty normal, and it wasn't just Disney producing these kinds of cartoons. Take a look at this Bugs Bunny reel: https://youtu.be/_-P9_oUV9Gw?t... [youtu.be]
Re: (Score:3)
Honestly the association with racism for Louis long after the fact says more about people watching today than it does about the incredible performance he gave.
Re: (Score:3)
Wow, Mr. Debate Team turned that around 360 degrees! I bet you don't even see race! Zing!
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
I dunno...that person kind of has a point.
When little kids watch these movies they just see crows and apes singing.
You apparently see something else...
Re: (Score:3)
When you're an adult watching them, they can be cringe worthy. Kids probably don't know what minstrel shows were.
Re:Disney's version of NC-17... (Score:5, Insightful)
When little kids watch these movies they just see crows and apes singing.
You apparently see something else...
And that's precisely how you indoctrinate racism into people's minds. It doesn't need to be overt. You don't need to grow up in a household with a raging white privileged man calling every black man ni**er. You can just feed people subtle examples all their life until they don't even realise they have turned into a racist offensive arse and then accuse everyone else of being "woke".
Re:Disney's version of NC-17... (Score:4, Insightful)
I dunno...that person kind of has a point.
When little kids watch these movies they just see crows and apes singing.
You apparently see something else...
I was born in the 1970s. The first few years of my life I lived where roughly 90% of the people in my neighborhood were middle class whites. When we relocated due to my dad's unemployment, only 25% of my town was white. When I was a kid I was unaware of black minstrel shows. When I heard the word minstrel I thought of the rooster in Disney's Robin Hood. I'm an adult now and recognize the racism.
There is a growing movement about cultural and racial awareness. In the 1980s we were told to be color blind, but that didn't work out so well. To not see color (and other features) is to ignore something that plays a huge part shaping the individual. Growing up white as a minority certainty shaped my ideas of racial prejudice. Needing to avoid certain neighborhoods because of my skin color made me more sensitive to what happened to blacks and their fight for civil liberties. I don't consider myself "woke" and I'm not politically correct for the sake of being politically correct.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
That is widely rumored to be the reason, but it's wrong. The game changed about a year before the rape issue came up. Mike Tyson was only signed to a limited term contract, and by the time they were due to renew the contract, Tyson had already lost the title, so Nintendo didn't see a benefit in renewing.
Tyson lost the title February 1990
Release of Punch-Out!!! (without the Mike Tyson branding) August 1990
Tyson arrested for rape July 1991
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
what about the swedish chef? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:what about the swedish chef? (Score:5, Funny)
He also speaks gibberish. Swedes do not in fact speak gibberish.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: what about the swedish chef? (Score:4, Insightful)
Last time I checked, it was pretty close to gibberish! XD
Re: (Score:3)
Racist!
I'm obviously not being serious, but there is truly a double standard here. The caricatures of Nordic accents that Americans (on the entire political spectrum) very gladly perform would be considered inappropriate by a lot of those same people if the caricatures were Asian ("Herro!"), Indian or one of the other established unmockable 'minorities'.
Re:what about the swedish chef? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: what about the swedish chef? (Score:5, Funny)
That should do it:
s/\p{Ul}\w*/Bork/; s/\w+/bork/
(In Perl style.)
Re: (Score:3)
Well I have tasted swedish food... I can relate to the muppets show
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
1) You're white
2) You're a man.
Re: what about the swedish chef? (Score:3, Informative)
You cannot be white.
(But having even 1/16 of blackness in you makes you "black" though. Because for SJWs, blackness still works like a taint, because they are still racist. Hence Obama being "black" instead of *mixed*.)
And you cannot be male.
(Weirdly, you can dress women's clothes and declare yourself a women though. But not loke Monthy Python. You have to be totally serious about it! Then you are declared "stunning and beautiful", even if you literally look like the Joker. And everything you say is True(TM
Re: what about the swedish chef? (Score:3)
Only if you give a shit.
Remember: They have no power unless you give it to them.
Re:Sexual Harassment (Score:5, Informative)
Miss Piggy is just one of many examples of female-on-male abuse being treated as comedy.
Re:Sexual Harassment (Score:5, Informative)
I'm glad this was modded informative as it's really important. It's not just violence either, the sexual assault of men is often played for laughs in movies and on TV: https://youtu.be/uc6QxD2_yQw [youtu.be]
Re:Sexual Harassment (Score:5, Insightful)
Male on male prison rape has been the target of many many jokes over the years.
After a concerted campaign by many feminists about rape culture, people are slowly, slowly waking up to the idea that maybe rape is actually not funny and that includes male victims, and maybe by extension prisons shouldn't be like that. Feminism it turns out is good for men too. Thankfully I had karma you burn because this post is going straight to -1.
Re: (Score:3)
https://fullfact.org/crime/are... [fullfact.org]
Re:Sexual Harassment (Score:5, Informative)
the reality is that domestic violence / abuse between genders is reversed in the real world a good 10:1
Totally false.
What is true is that most of the worst examples of violence between the sexes seem to be male-on-female, those which create death and/or dismemberment... some high-profile examples of more-literal-than-usual dismemberment aside.
Re:Sexual Harassment (Score:5, Informative)
Others have pointed out that it's not 10:1, but even at 10:1 it would be a major societal concern.
Giving a select portion of the population the monopoly on sympathy for issues that may effect other people is a very bad idea.
News for Nazis? (Score:2)
Wokies gonna woke... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"not being racist" is a mind virus I'm happy to be infected by. I'm not at all sorry it triggers you, I find the histrionics and pearl clutching from the perpetually offended crowd the be hilarious.
Re:Wokies gonna woke... (Score:5, Funny)
Yes, and they rip your arm off if they lose, so might I suggest a new strategy? Oh wait, mis-read. Never mind.
Swedish cheff is racist! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
But what he say is Bork Bork Bork. Which means the opposite.
If they feel the need (Score:5, Insightful)
If they feel the need to do something, I'd rather they put warning labels on it and leave it intact - like they did - than to cut out chunks of the original show.
Sometimes you have to view things in their historical context, though.
Re: (Score:3)
Comment removed (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
The Carol Burnett Show (Score:5, Interesting)
I used to enjoy watching The Carol Burnett Show, but there's no 100% complete collection on DVD. Instead, there are various "best of" collections. So I tried to assemble my own complete collection. In doing so, I found that many episodes have politically incorrect skits full of ugly stereotypes that haven't withstood the test of time. It's both fascinating and disappointing, and now know one reason why a complete collection on DVD doesn't exist.
But that's progress! (1 Cor 13:11)
Re: (Score:3)
Ahh, yes. the "Gone With the Wind" sketch, and the gender-swapped "Star Trek" sketch, could cause some political consternation today. They were both wonderful at the time.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:The Carol Burnett Show (Score:4, Informative)
Apparently every episode has been available on streaming since last year: https://tvweb.com/the-carol-bu... [tvweb.com]
I think the lack of a complete DVD set is probably due to the number of discs it would need. I see there are "best of" collections with 55 episodes + special features, and they are 31 disc sets. At that point I'm not sure many people would pay the extra for another few episodes that probably weren't that great.
Song of the South (Score:2)
Now that shit needed a parental warning of some kind...
"Native American" is wrong, use "American Indian" (Score:5, Informative)
FYI, most American Indians would prefer "American Indian" or "Indian" rather than "Native American".
Re: (Score:3)
It depends who you ask. Some prefer Native American, some American Indian, some Tribal Nations/Natives etc.
Best just to ask if they don't give any indication.
Re: "Native American" is wrong, use "American Indi (Score:4, Insightful)
If youâ(TM)re not a protected class it is just better to avoid all discussion of the matter, and any other pc-adjacent matters.
Donâ(TM)t even mention they exist. Anything you say can and will be intentionally misconstrued and used against you. No matter how dedicated you are to truth, justice, and love, your skin color and their otherizarion will result in attacks.
Re: (Score:3)
No, it's "best" to go with whatever non-offensive term you want to use. And, I don't care if *you're* offended. I'm not being offensive and my intentions are what matters.
That's literally not how offense works. If you're trying not to be offensive, that literally means you're trying not to offend the people you're communicating with, because offense is always in the eye of the beholder.
"Native American" is a non-descriptive term because the country is filled with native Americans who are all different colors and ethnicities. The best descriptive term is "American Indian", although they're not from India. However, people from India or of Indian origin wouldn't use that term, so it's available.
I can't speak for anyone else, but a reason it seems likely to be offensive is that they were neither natives nor Americans when white people got here. The Clovis people got here before the people we think of as Native Americans, and either died off or were killed off by those people. And nobo
Re:"Native American" is wrong, use "American India (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
As an Indian, I don't want indigenous Americans appropriating the word for my nationality.
Re: (Score:3)
I don't know if he's correct regarding all the Indian Nations; but the closest one to me refers to itself as the Puyallup Tribe of Indians [puyallup-tribe.com].
Re: apparently you don't know any indians (Score:2)
s/SCO/Microsoft/
Hating SCO is like hating the person that leatherface stole the face skin from to wear as a mask.
If its harmful why are they showing it ? (Score:2)
Not a fan of disney but ... (Score:4, Insightful)
As Richard Pryor observed, Star Wars has a problem (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:As Richard Pryor observed, Star Wars has a prob (Score:4, Insightful)
Slap disclaimers on everything.... (Score:2)
...until they become meaningless.
Gone with the wind, Song of the South: Yes.
A few seconds of a confederate flag to symbolize "southern" and "country music" in general: no.
This is like putting a "caution wet floor" sign out 24/7.
Re:Slap disclaimers on everything.... (Score:5, Insightful)
A few seconds of a confederate flag to symbolize "southern" and "country music" in general: no.
Why on earth not? Frankly as an outsider, it's weird how much a bunch of people who seem obsessed with their country are also utterly obsessed with being part of the side that failed to destroy it. And so that they could keep slaves too, in complete opposition to any remotely sane reading of the constitution they so profess to love.
Given what the south were fighting for, the Confederate flag is a symbol of oppression.
Re: (Score:3)
Given what the south were fighting for, the Confederate flag is a symbol of oppression.
Yes. But does the Muppet Show stand for oppression? No.
Is the use problematic nowadays? Yes. But as problematic as Song of the South downplaying slavery? No.
So yes, it should be addressed, but in a gradual process. If you slap the same boilerplate disclaimer onto everything, then it becomes meaningless. Maybe a warning that the content is older than 1980, An inconsiderate use of a symbol common at that time? Apology in a footnote or the commentary track maybe.
As I said, it should be addressed. But if you th
Re: (Score:3)
Yes. But does the Muppet Show stand for oppression? No.
Exactly. Which is a great idea for them to you know, stop using a symbol of oppression.
Is the use problematic nowadays? Yes.
Good, we agree.
But as problematic as Song of the South downplaying slavery? No.
Never seen it, or heard of it before, but the consensus on this thread seems to be that it's pretty bad, so I'll happily take you word for it.
So yes, it should be addressed, but in a gradual process. If you slap the same boilerplate disclaimer onto ever
Original disclaimer (Score:3)
On one show, Kermit prefaced a skit with: "some scenes may not be suitable for adults".
Lies (Score:3)
Those stereotypes were not wrong in the past. And certainly not wrong in many places in the world now.
So much for contextually accurate for its time (Score:5, Insightful)
Thank god I still own a hard copy of Blazing Saddles. The movie was deliberately offensive to point at the absurdity of it all by using humor to get the point across. Something Mel Brooks is famous for. Eventually Disney will cave to the pressures and just edit scenes entirely. I am glad they arent as of yet, but give cancel-culture time. Whats next, Book burnings and deletions of news reels depicting what went down during the civil rights protests in the 60s? Those that ignore history are doomed to repeat it.
Does anyone honestly think that old clips of washed up stars is somehow going to influence young kids to normalize the behaviors? They were washed up even when they appeared on the show. They havent been relevant since the early 70s. I am fairly sure nobody is paying attention to Jim Meadows (gomer pyle). They just want to see the colorful puppets talking. The eagle giving the news of the time lost all relevance, but pigs in space will always be timeless. The Lime In the Coconut skit will always get a laugh.
stereotypes (Score:4, Insightful)
Content Disclaimer: The below text uses words, which are considered harmful by many authoritarians. It is wrong to use words to convince people, as every opinion has the same value, no matter how completely ridiculously fucked up it is.
Stereotypes have such a bad reputation and yet they evolved for a reason. It helps - especially kids and us when we are new to a domain - to think in simplifications. Otherwise the whole of human knowledge is just too large and complex to comprehend.
And successful stereotypes often have a big grain of truth to them as well, that's why they work. The stereotypical German actually does have features that are present in many Germans. Same for stereotypical other countries, races, religions, professions, dogs, houses, cars, ...
There's a good reason that in school, we are taught the general principles, then usually (physics is famous for that) the next year they teach you "well yes, except..." and unravel more of the details.
There's currently a culture developing around us, which focusses too much on bringing all the complexity and differentiation into everything, from the beginning.
Should we teach kids that all black people are dangerous? Of course not. Should we be allowed to include in a show that Germans like sausage? Why the heck not? Later in life they can still learn that there are Vegetarians in Germany, too.
Many of us were brought up on stereotypes, and we aren't haters of everything. In fact, tolerance often develops when we discover by ourselves that our stereotypes don't always apply. That learning process when you actually meet a person from minority X for the first time and figure out within a few seconds that they're just another person, have a quick (internal) laugh about your stereotype and go on with your life - don't take that from people. It's a better teacher than all your diversity programs.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
you can even see Song of the South outside of the USA just never mention you saw it or you will be attacked.
Re: (Score:2)
you can even see Song of the South outside of the USA just never mention you saw it or you will be attacked.
I don't see why I would be attacked outside of the US for watching a US film, unless that "outside of the US" is somewhere in North Korea. But thanks for the watching tip anyway -- now I'm interested what the fuss is about.
Re: (Score:2)
He's basically saying don't tell folks in the US that you saw Song of the South outside the US or you'll be attacked.
[John]
Re: (Score:2)
Please kill yourself. You are of no use to society, you spam-posting brainless marching moron. ... Have a nice day. :)
Re: (Score:2)
They have already started to do the same for their older more questionable content. Peter Pan and Dumbo are among the movies with similar disclosures.
Re: (Score:2)
"aughfull "??? That's awfully awful. I'm in awe.
Re:What about Disney's content (Score:5, Insightful)
That's the problem.... if the disclaimer was:
Warning: The content in this episode of the Muppet Show was considered acceptable at time of production, but may be considered as offensive in today's society. Be advised that if you plan to watch this with your children, you should be prepared to talk to them about how things have changed in a remarkably short time period, and make sure they understand the context of this content. If your children are young enough that this would be a difficult topic to discuss, you may wish to skip this episode, and revisit it at a later time when they can understand that this is no longer acceptable content. ... then I'd be all for it. But I'm sick and tired of people pretending that what is considered racism and intolerance today, wasn't widely considered, including by minorities, as acceptable (if a bit on the edge of then.
Consider the following comedians: Nipsy Russell, Red Foxx, Sammy Davis Jr., Richard Pryor and *early* Eddie Murphy (when he did stand-up). Watch some of their material. Watch their appearances on the old "Man of the Hour" series or "Friar's Club Roasts". Watch Blazing Saddles, for god's sake.
Times have changed. We can't change the past, only learn from it. Disney seems intent on changing the past, rather than using it as an educational opportunity. I've read Huckleberry Finn, the Adventures of Tom Sawyer, AND seen Song of the South-- and appreciated all in their appropriate context. It's insulting to today's youth to think they're too stupid to understand "Things were different then".
Re: (Score:3)
I watched it as a child. Really good shows like Sesame Street, the Muppets, and in the "which one doesn't belong" category, Doctor Who, worked for children because they're fun. They're goofy. Then years later, you watch it again, and realize there was a whole 'nother level of context that had (mostly) flown right past you.
Social commentary and kid's entertainment are not necessarily exclusive-- but writers have gotten lazier over the years, and feel compelled to either produce shows that are effectively
Re: What about Disney's content (Score:2)
Release within reason (e.g. where legal). Where content is anachronistic they can include warnings. For example, they could include some commentary to explain why Finn was sidelined in the sequel trilogy. They could also explain why they shrunk his image on the posters intended for China. People will understand that it was a very different world back in 2017.
Re: (Score:2, Offtopic)
From the notorious Führer Wiener Song, to Beethoven's tune for "An de Freude" -
Deine Führer
Hat ein Wiener,
Nicht zo lang und
Ein Ball schort.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Poorly paid doesn't even begin to describe it. Disney is known to get their call center reps from Arise Virtual Solutions, a company that's hard to google already (as "outsource", "call center", "pay to work" etc. are SEO-optimized to hell) and will probably change their name soon, Blackwater-style.
Here's a nice article on them [propublica.org].
The crows in Dumbo may be somewhat offensive, but if you think disclaimers on them makes the company enlightened keep in mind this is not at all offensive to Disney.
Do not abuse call
Re: Ironically (Score:2)
Really? Because Disney currently employs a squad of 40 people you must apologize and grovel to with scripts for every perceived slight you may have done to an abc-xyz person. And even though some of those people know itâ(TM)s all BS, the power they get from this to cancel any random actor has risen well to their heads.
Not Disney's Fault (Score:2)
"Disney has always been run by fucktards. They produce some good content, sure. But why does it seem that half the girls who go through Disney wind up basically sluts? So given that it seems to be a sex training factory, they have to do stupid shit like this to cover their asses and give the appearance that they care."
Well, to be fair, Disney doesn't sexualize these people. It's the rest of us that do that. We'll sexualize anything put in front of us.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Please, for the love of everything holy... (Score:5, Insightful)
If people can cope with the show mocking their culture, I'm fairly certain I can cope with a 5 second banner warning me that the show might come across as a little outdated in its views.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
While they're at it, they should also explain that Walt Disney was a notorious anti-semite.
He must be turning in his cryogenic freezer.
Re: Did they banned the episode of... (Score:2, Troll)
That's nothing!
Miss Piggy clearly is abusing Kermit and always on the verge of raping him!
But wait! She a woman of color! (pink) So it's aww-right(TM)!