Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Movies Censorship China

Original 'Fight Club' Ending Restored in China After Censorship Backlash (hollywoodreporter.com) 86

Last month streamers in China discovered that Fight Club had arrived on streaming platform Tencent — but with an entirely new ending where local authorities "rapidly figured out the whole plan and arrested all criminals....."

But now there's been another round of changes, according to the Hollywood Reporter. "After widespread online backlash to clumsy censorship of the film's ending, Chinese streaming service Tencent Video backtracked in recent days and restored most of the cuts it had made." Crucially, Fight Club's complete ending is now viewable in full in China...

News of the cuts went viral around the world and sparked much debate and embarrassment on Chinese social media about local censorship practices.... [I]t would appear that the backlash has been deemed more troublesome than the fictional film's ending, as Tencent has now restored 11 of the 12 minutes it originally cut from the 137-minute movie. The minute still missing is mostly comprised of brief nude sex scenes between Brad Pitt's and Helena Bonham Carter's characters.

Insider reports that changing the original ending provoked comments like these on China's Twitter-like platform Weibo:

- "This has become a Chinese-only joke. Even dogs won't want to watch this."

- "This is exactly why, even if you have streaming platform subscriptions, you still have to watch pirated versions."


And it brought massive attention to China's history of changing movies, notes the Wrap since "word quickly spread across the globe, bringing embarrassment to the country," reports the Wrap: Censorship of American films and TV shows at the behest of Chinese officials has become common as Hollywood has made in-roads in the country over the past decade. Last year, an episode of "The Simpsons" in which the titular family visits China was removed from Disney+ in Hong Kong over a joke made in the film about the Tiananmen Square protests in 1989 and the Chinese government's censorship of the event.
Even the South China Morning Post reported that Chuck Palahniuk, the author of the novel that inspired the film, "appeared to mock the move on Twitter. 'Everyone gets a happy ending in China!' he wrote..." Similar changes have been made to other films in China in the past. Nicolas Cage's 2005 crime film Lord of War had its final half-hour cut and replaced with text reading, "Yuri Orlov confessed all the crimes officially charged against him in court and was sentenced to life imprisonment in the end."
And another example from the Hollywood Reporter: After 20th Century Fox's Queen biopic Bohemian Rhapsody won multiple Oscars in the 2018, it was granted a theatrical release in China — but only after all mentions of Freddie Mercury's homosexuality were cut from the film.
But in this case a global popular outcry appears to have been too embarrasing to endure. According to the Hollywood Reporter now we even have an expected ending to the story of how China tried to censor Fight Club.

"Reversals of censorship actions are extremely rare within China's entertainment industry — but cuts to Hollywood movies are not."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Original 'Fight Club' Ending Restored in China After Censorship Backlash

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 07, 2022 @12:14AM (#62244945)

    Cold food, terrible 'quarantine' hotels, and false positive tests are destroying Olympic athletes.

    China's malevolent government is imploding on its own shortsighted posturing.

  • by RitchCraft ( 6454710 ) on Monday February 07, 2022 @12:14AM (#62244947)
    A.A. Milne's fabulous shows will be available again soon?
    • by Arethan ( 223197 )

      Like zoology-themed shows? Aren't those primarily relegated to south-of-the-border venues? I thought we covered this already [slashdot.org]...

    • That would be good, however the Fight Club is not a direct comment about the CCP and Xi Jinping in particular.

    • Chairman Xi Ping should be honoured to be compared to Winnie the Pooh. One of the greatest characters in children's literature.

      • It's not an insult to be compared to that nice friendly bear. Though it's insult to pretend that all Chinese politics are solely about Xi.
        • "Though it's insult to pretend that all Chinese politics are solely about Xi." What??
        • by SB5407 ( 4372273 )

          It's insult to pretend that all Chinese politics are solely about Xi.

          Yes. But no, right?

          Under the CCP, unless I'm mistaken, Xi Jinping is the state, and the state is Xi Jinping. No large group of people is ever fully homogeneous - no matter what the CCP says - so there is room for nuance in the discussion, but it's not unfair to lay a lot at the feet at Xi. My understanding is that the CCP wants everyone to think that he is infallible, his word inviolate, etc. Of course, that's impossible, but it's the official party line, isn't it?

          Xi Jinping is a Chinese politician who has been serving as General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and Chairman of the Central Military Commission (CMC) since 2012, and President of the People's Republic of China (PRC) since 2013. Xi has been the paramount leader of China, the most prominent political leader in China, since 2012.

          The paramount leader - also named supreme leader - of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and Government of the People's Republic of China (PRC) is a term for the most prominent political leader in China.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]

          • by SB5407 ( 4372273 )

            Because the official party line is a lie/is impossible, the CCP can spin things however they want, whenever they want. What is attributable to Xi and what is not is nearly totally opaque and very hard to discern. The CCP I'm sure will attribute all good things to him (or perhaps the party) and attribute all bad things to rotten individuals in the CCP; the West; America; anyone and everything except Xi or the party as a whole.

            It's such a farce. The official party line ostensibly precludes the possibility tha

    • by OzPeter ( 195038 )

      A.A. Milne's fabulous shows will be available again soon?

      Japanese Olympic figure skater Yuzuru Hanyu is known for fans throwing Winnie the Pooh [time.com] toys onto the ice after his performances. I would have so loved to have seen that in this years olympics.

  • Strange hypocrisy (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Baconsmoke ( 6186954 ) on Monday February 07, 2022 @12:22AM (#62244953)
    You changed the ending to an old movie? You should be so embarrassed. Result: We are embarrassed and will fix this. You are committing genocide on the Uyghurs? You should be so embarrassed. Result: We are not embarrassed and will not change a damn thing.
    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      The CCP clearly is embarrassed about the Uyghurs though. They have been making sure everyone can see Uyghur athletes at the Olympics.

      It's not really surprising though. The part of the government that handles film censorship, if indeed it even was the government and not just Tencent employees, and the part that handles the genocide of the Uyghurs are unlikely to have much overlap.

  • I wonder how that looks
  • by Eunomion ( 8640039 ) on Monday February 07, 2022 @01:31AM (#62245055)
    If I'm not mistaken, the 1997 film "Red Corner" was the last wide-release American film that had the Chinese government in the role of a villain. Literally a quarter of a century ago.

    That is amazing, considering that every other member of the UN Security Council gets roasted in film on a regular basis, and China is the only one that is still explicitly and rigorously authoritarian.
    • by Dutch Gun ( 899105 ) on Monday February 07, 2022 @02:34AM (#62245139)

      Richard Gere is still a non-entity in mainstream Hollywood for never backing down on his advocacy opposing China's occupation of Tibet.

      China is a problem, but they wouldn't be nearly so large a problem if most Western corporations (including Hollywood) didn't subserviently kowtow whenever there's a chance to make just a bit more money. We didn't create that monster, but we sure as hell fed and nurtured it, and continue to do so.

      It's still astounding to me that China is afforded Most Favored Nation trade status. History will look back and wonder how we could be so shortsighted.

      • History will look back and wonder how we could be so shortsighted.

        Yeah, I agree. But there was never any We about it. For some reason, "American" business as a whole generally doesn't like this country's values, and has been trying to do away with them ever since they were first articulated.

        They sympathized with the British Empire, but saw a chance to be kings themselves rather than merely kneel to one. Sympathized with the Confederacy, but it was too disorganized to serve up the level of slavery they dreamed of inflicting on Americans. Sympathized with Nazi German

        • For some reason, "American" business as a whole generally doesn't like this country's values, and has been trying to do away with them ever since they were first articulated.

          Money accretes money. Every business owner thinks they're god's gift to mankind because they create jobs (11!1!!1) and provide services that people want. They nearly always want the government to just get out of the way and let them do anything they see fit, ignoring that they wouldn't be able to even have a business without the government's protections.

          • An MBA I was talking to once said something with the words "my country", and it drew my attention because he had earlier used the same tone and attitude when he said "my car." No sense of identity or personal obligation involved, just meaninglessly bragging about what he considered his property.

            No wonder guys like that admire the CCP: An organization which admits no distinction between itself and China, and meets the living reality of such distinctions with unhinged violence.
    • Stands to reason. You don't bite the hand which feeds you.

      I just grabbed a few movies at random:
      Spiderman Far from home: China is the only foreign market to bring in 9 figures https://www.boxofficemojo.com/... [boxofficemojo.com]
      The Matrix Resurections: Okay it was a failure but China still is second only to the USA in box office figures. Surprisingly did well in Japan too https://www.boxofficemojo.com/... [boxofficemojo.com]
      Avengers: A couple of markets broke the 9 figure threshold, but the UK's number 3 spot with $115m pales in comparison to Ch

      • There is hope in the fact that self-censorship tends, by its very nature, to be self-limiting.

        It creates a vacuum that a motivated artist can exploit, given the right talent and the right timing.

        And the impact of such a "truth bomb" would be lopsided. If the CCP has to bribe or threaten Hollywood every time such a product appeared on the radar, then it will start appearing more and more in order to seek more money. The financial incentive structure they created would be turned on its head very quick
    • That is amazing, considering that every other member of the UN Security Council gets roasted in film on a regular basis, and China is the only one that is still explicitly and rigorously authoritarian.

      To be fair, pretty much all military films benefit from the support of the US military (to provide locations, equipment etc), and this is no small reason why there are so many 'US military saves the world' movies out there. I mean, pretty much any movie outside of historical drama with the US military in it involves them saving the world.

      To an outsider this could easily be construed as US government propaganda, when really it's the same as the Chinese thing - which is that they pay the money/provide the equ

      • I see a more mundane selection bias involved there: Someone is more likely to make a movie about the US military in a present context if they support it than if they don't. Whereas critics are more apt to go to a historical context, because their goal is to educate, and the facts are clearer. Custer, Vietnam, etc. Educating in a present context wouldn't just be controversial, it would actually be a much bigger artistic challenge.

        But that dynamic is very different with the China relationship. Hollywoo
    • It's all about the money... Those other security council members won't ban said movie... China on the other hand? Sorry, marketplace is now closed - and we make up 52% of the global box office...
    • ..That is amazing, considering that every other member of the UN Security Council gets roasted in film on a regular basis,...

      I guess I don't get out to movies much. Aside from Russia, I don't recall any other members of the Security Council [un.org] being portrayed as the villain lately. Oh, I guess there was the Alamo movie which portrayed a member as the villain, but that was set a century before the UN was founded, so I don't know if that counts. Have I been missing any good movies roasting the other members?

      • I was only thinking of the five permanent members, but at least half of the current elected seats also get roasted regularly. Not saying undeservedly (criticism of any government in media is generally soft-pedaled), it just sets up a stark contrast with the total vacuum of mainstream film and TV criticism of a gigantic, profoundly corrupt, and brutally dystopian state like China.

        Someone taught only by movies would be incredulous that China's government ranks significantly worse than Mexico on corruption
  • by demon driver ( 1046738 ) on Monday February 07, 2022 @02:16AM (#62245113) Journal

    ... that China actually rolled back governmentally enforced changes in a foreign movie after public criticism.

    For me, that's the real news here, and they're not bad news, either.

    • Doesn't sound like the government forced them, they just did it preemptively to avoid government action. If it were a state decision, it would never have been reversed, and we would definitely not be hearing criticism of it.
  • ...In that the Hollywood liberals are trying to impede upon fascist/GOP ideas.
  • It's a real pity that real people have to suffer under their ham-fisted implementations of some unholy blend of Josef Stalin and 1984, otherwise Xi's China would be second only to Vlad's Russia as a never-ending supply of laughs for the rest of the world.
  • by TJHook3r ( 4699685 ) on Monday February 07, 2022 @06:03AM (#62245431)
    Once you start reviewing many blockbusters you come to the conclusion that Western audiences like to root for the little guys and the outlaws. I can think of many films that need some rewrites: clearly Luke Skywalker is a disobedient son and should take up his role in the family business and arrest his outlaw friends... Robin Hood should be locked up by the brave Sheriff...
    • Once you start reviewing many blockbusters you come to the conclusion that Western audiences like to root for the little guys and the outlaws.

      Yeah, but we must be on our way past that. I mean how many thin blue line flags do you see at NASCAR events [washingtonpost.com], a sport which grew out of alcohol smuggling by bootleggers during prohibition? It was explicitly about sticking it to the man, but now the crowds are full of people who would love to get down on their faces and lick the man's boots.

  • United States have their own censoring of movies, tv shows, anime from Europe and Asia in order to play in the US. However, I do not think they ever went as far as China and changed endings.

  • Chuck Palahniuk said that the Chinese edits actually make the movie closer too the book and wasn't too upset about it.

    He said that people were censoring his work all of the time but it wasn't "news" until the Chinese did it.

    https://www.vanityfair.com/hol... [vanityfair.com]

  • If I was the oppressive censorship-happy CCP I wouldn't want this movie out there either, but I wouldn't try to chop of the ending and replace it with a line of text which takes a complete U turn from where the entire movie was leading. I'd just ban the movie.

  • ...Only During the Olympics so Travelers Don't Experience How Authoritarian and Fascist China Actually Is Fixed the title.
  • There's a good article in the Wall Street Journal this past weekend on how MGM chose to kowtow to China on the remake of Red Dawn. In the original, nobody worried about offending the Soviets. Now, everybody is bending over to the Chinese government lest they be banned from that market. The Red Dawn remake was originally written and shot with China as the bad guy but MGM chose to modify the whole thing to make North Korea the bad guy to the point of hiring VFX people to replace every visual reference to C

  • In death, stories that have been abused get a name.

Technology is dominated by those who manage what they do not understand.

Working...