'Lord of the Rings' Prequel Series Will Explore 'Unseen History' of Middle-Earth (geektyrant.com) 183
The site GeekyTyrant is excited about Amazon's upcoming eight-episode series The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power — premiering September 2 and set in Middle-earth's "Second Age," thousands of years before the events of The Hobbit and The Lord Of The Rings.)
With the film being set in a completely different age, I was expecting Middle-Earth to be very different than what we've seen in the past. As we've seen in the first trailer that was released, the show does has a similar visual style as Peter Jackson's films, but things are definitely going to be different.
During a recent interview with Empire, Rings Of Power concept artist John Howe, teased some of the surprises that are in store:
"This isn't the Middle-earth you remember. This is a world that's very vibrant. The elves are not hidden away in Mirkwood or lingering in Rivendell. They're busy constructing kingdoms. The dwarven kingdom of Moria is not an abandoned mine and the Grey Havens is not yet an abandoned city. I loved having the opportunity to explore that unseen history."
He went on to share that the series will finally explore the oceans of Middle-Earth and says that there will be a set of seafaring elves.
Or, as Amazon's press release puts it, The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power "will take viewers back to an era in which great powers were forged, kingdoms rose to glory and fell to ruin, unlikely heroes were tested, hope hung by the finest of threads, and the greatest villain that ever flowed from Tolkien's pen threatened to cover all the world in darkness...."
The Independent notes the show "has been in the works since 2017" — and that Prime Video bought the rights for $250m (£183m). And now Prime Video has even invited some JRR Tolkien fans to attent a preview screening of the show: [F]ans of Middle Earth were nervous ahead of sitting down to watch footage from the show — but those nerves soon made way for excitement, with fans praising the series as well as the showrunners, JD Payne and Patrick McKay.... Fan Dr Maggie Parke said that the showrunners "kept up with the best of us", stating: "Their passion & knowledge made me feel like they were one of us, they get it. I'm feeling very optimistic...!"
The newspaper quotes another preview attendee's conclusion that ""We, as Tolkien fans, are in good hands! Above and beyond, I was absolutely blown away. I cannot wait to see more — it's just beyond words."
During a recent interview with Empire, Rings Of Power concept artist John Howe, teased some of the surprises that are in store:
"This isn't the Middle-earth you remember. This is a world that's very vibrant. The elves are not hidden away in Mirkwood or lingering in Rivendell. They're busy constructing kingdoms. The dwarven kingdom of Moria is not an abandoned mine and the Grey Havens is not yet an abandoned city. I loved having the opportunity to explore that unseen history."
He went on to share that the series will finally explore the oceans of Middle-Earth and says that there will be a set of seafaring elves.
Or, as Amazon's press release puts it, The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power "will take viewers back to an era in which great powers were forged, kingdoms rose to glory and fell to ruin, unlikely heroes were tested, hope hung by the finest of threads, and the greatest villain that ever flowed from Tolkien's pen threatened to cover all the world in darkness...."
The Independent notes the show "has been in the works since 2017" — and that Prime Video bought the rights for $250m (£183m). And now Prime Video has even invited some JRR Tolkien fans to attent a preview screening of the show: [F]ans of Middle Earth were nervous ahead of sitting down to watch footage from the show — but those nerves soon made way for excitement, with fans praising the series as well as the showrunners, JD Payne and Patrick McKay.... Fan Dr Maggie Parke said that the showrunners "kept up with the best of us", stating: "Their passion & knowledge made me feel like they were one of us, they get it. I'm feeling very optimistic...!"
The newspaper quotes another preview attendee's conclusion that ""We, as Tolkien fans, are in good hands! Above and beyond, I was absolutely blown away. I cannot wait to see more — it's just beyond words."
Comment removed (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, call me Camlost!
no, they are making the unfinished tales of numenor and the middle earth
Re: (Score:2)
*crosses fingers, crosses toes* (Score:5, Funny)
Oh please, please PLEASE let these shows be filled with plenty of angst-driven, interpersonal-relationship drama! We don't get nearly enough of that in other current TV shows and movies!
Re:*crosses fingers, crosses toes* (Score:5, Funny)
Don't worry. I hear Sauron became evil because someone didn't call him by his preferred pronoun. Then he went all triggly puff. But it wasn't until after he got a botched gender reassignment surgery the he started to really hate humans. Then he found out that the hormone therapy left him infertile, so he decided to kill everyone.
Re: (Score:2)
Dear God, where are my my mod points for this treasure?
Re: (Score:2)
I have them mate. :P
But please call me just Angelo
Re: (Score:2)
I'm sure they'll also find some way to work how it was actually political polarization which lead to all the wars in LOTR. Bonus points if they invent some sort of middle-earth version of Twitter, probably with actual birds carrying Tweets on tiny little scrolls.
Re: *crosses fingers, crosses toes* (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If its truly supposed to follow the appendices then its going to be a bunch of deities having a pissing match. Tolkien essentially gave Britain a mythology comparable to ancient greece and rome.
It was Nordic mythology that influenced Tolkien heavily. https://theculturetrip.com/eur... [theculturetrip.com] I think we should retcon some highly successful original woke story to turn it into a 1950's man story.
Oh wait, there aren't any.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh please, please PLEASE let these shows be filled with plenty of angst-driven, interpersonal-relationship drama! We don't get nearly enough of that in other current TV shows and movies!
this is Amazon Prime Video not CW so probably just ends up being slightly disappointing and/or forgettable.
Re: *crosses fingers, crosses toes* (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Theres going to be some woke culture in there. Its almost a given. Hopefully not nearly as bad as netflix, or CBS/Paramount. CBS cant do a single show without 2/3rd the cast being some variant of wokeness. It doesnt matter if they find themselves 3000yrs in the future, Apparently wokeness is the ONLY fad to survive more than a century.
Have you seen the amazon commercial where Medusa doesn''t want to kill people, so she buys a pair of sunglasses and people can't see her eyes. Then she goes into a bar, enjoying some time with the gurls. A guy across the bar smiles at the ladies, so Medusa takes off her sunglasses and kills him.
You can bet with misandry like that being used to appeal to the woke, where a smile by a man (plus apparently the forbidden "male gaze") is a valid reason for killing a guy, this LOTR prequel by the same company w
Re: (Score:2)
Wow, that commercial really traumatized you didnt it? You do realize that much like in video games or movies that guy was not actually killed, don't you?
Re: (Score:2)
"plenty of angst-driven, interpersonal-relationship drama"
This is a world where Galadriel's cousin invented war because someone stole his jewelry, in the process cursing the whole family. The things you imagine Amazon to be corrupting the story with are already in the source material.
God make it stop.... (Score:5, Insightful)
Can we please, for the love of the uncertainty principle, stop extending great pieces of entertainment into never ending mediocrity?
It's really too much. Why do we feel the need to destroy our own folklore?
Re:God make it stop.... (Score:5, Insightful)
Can we please, for the love of the uncertainty principle, stop extending great pieces of entertainment into never ending mediocrity?
It's really too much. Why do we feel the need to destroy our own folklore?
because that's what humans always do. Virgil wrote the aeneid crappy fanfic level sequal to the Iliad and the Odyssey, Ovid did shitty Latin rewrites of the Greek myths, medieval monks rewrote the Norse and Celtic mythologies to make gods into weirdly immortal human kings or fairies.
Re:God make it stop.... (Score:5, Interesting)
To counterpoint ....
Some of us like it. LOTRO - the online MMO - had a fantastic exploration of middle earth, and I have amazingly fond memories of years of exploring middle earth and learning more about the lore surrounding the universe that Tolkien created. I'm looking forward to seeing the universe expanded more.
Re: (Score:2)
Expanded or changed? You likely enjoyed the game because it followed the lore of the books and the world created within them. The reason people are complaining with this new series is because Amazon is being too liberal with it. It's like taking a Black Panther movie and then making 60% the tribesman into white/asian/latino people, and then making most male characters weak or pathetic even. That wouldn't fit into that world or even a tribalism society portrayed in the comics. They wouldn't be expanding Blac
Re:God make it stop.... (Score:5, Insightful)
It hasn't even broadcast yet... And Amazon does have a decent track record. Bosch is one of the best TV shows in the last couple of decades.
I think I'll at least wait to see it before writing it off.
Re: (Score:3)
And Amazon does have a decent track record.
Um, Wheel of Time anyone???
Re: (Score:3)
And Amazon does have a decent track record. Bosch is one of the best TV shows in the last couple of decades.
Amazon's Wheel of Time is a much more likely reference and it was really bad.
Re: (Score:2)
Amazon is spending almost 6 times as much money making this LOTR show https://www.hollywoodreporter.... [hollywoodreporter.com] as it did on Wheel of Time https://www.express.co.uk/show... [express.co.uk] . Clearly Wheel of Time is not their priority.
... our own folklore? (Score:2)
Can we please, for the love of the uncertainty principle, stop extending great pieces of entertainment into never ending mediocrity?
It's really too much. Why do we feel the need to destroy our own folklore?
Well, clearly Tolkien himself drew upon a great deal of folklore, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
At the end of the day, it's fiction - and over centuries, existing fiction is embellished and modified - e.g. The Bible.
It just happens a little faster now and often the quality leaves little to be desired, but I'm sure the same could be said of much written fiction throughout the ages, that expands upon and/or demolishes existing "folklore".
Re: (Score:2)
Can we please, for the love of the uncertainty principle, stop extending great pieces of entertainment into never ending mediocrity?
It's really too much. Why do we feel the need to destroy our own folklore?
Well, clearly Tolkien himself drew upon a great deal of folklore, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
At the end of the day, it's fiction - and over centuries, existing fiction is embellished and modified - e.g. The Bible. It just happens a little faster now and often the quality leaves little to be desired, but I'm sure the same could be said of much written fiction throughout the ages, that expands upon and/or demolishes existing "folklore".
It is a pity that today's people are not capable of making their own folklore. Tolkien's folklore was distinctly nordic in origin. https://theculturetrip.com/eur... [theculturetrip.com]
But he took influence, not say, make Odin a dark skinned transgender woman.
And that's the difference. If the woke wish to make an incredibly diverse and inclusive mythology, would it not make more sense to create one of their own? If you want to borrow from non fair-skinned people mythologies there are a lot of African mythologies to choose
Reason to Hope (Score:2)
Can we please, for the love of the uncertainty principle, stop extending great pieces of entertainment into never ending mediocrity?
This is not quite the same as what they normally do though. Tolkien did provide a history and storylines for a LoTR prequel in the second age so it's not like they had to make everything up which is what usually ends in disaster as everything gets warped to fit timing and cost budgets and to deliver modern political messages. That does not mean it is going to be a success but it is, perhaps, a reason to hope that it might be.
Re: (Score:2)
"The backstory is already written? We ain't got time for that! We have to be modern and relevant!"
Re: God make it stop.... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I'll turn off the moment Gollem (Smeagol)/Bilbo/Sauron or any of the other characters appear, or even their ancestors appear. If it's thousands of years before, then there should be absolutely no obvious link between characters, otherwise it's just Star Wars prequels all over again.
I guess on the supposed timeline, there should be no men (or else very few), Rivendell should probably just be a shack by a lake, the Elves should just be starting to get organised and the dwarves should probably just be surface-
Re: (Score:2)
People can't LET GO! What was that showbiz line.... leave them wanting more?
You don't give them more until it becomes too much. We do now.
As long as you are willing to consume the stuff they'll exploit everything you like as something to draw your interest -- it's also your fault for picking something familiar despite the long history of failures and how it's simply more difficult to recreate what it was that made the original successful; often the people hired do not know.
Re: (Score:2)
Can we please, for the love of the uncertainty principle, stop extending great pieces of entertainment into never ending mediocrity?
It's really too much. Why do we feel the need to destroy our own folklore?
Deconstructionism. I get crap because I dare utter the word, but taking beloved things and shitting all over them to produce dreck is exactly deconstruction.
If it wasn't, they'd write their own stuff rather than destroying successful stuff.
Re: (Score:2)
Exactly! Shit, it's like nobody has an imagination anymore! Next, it'll be: "Let's make Gandalf a woman! and the ring will be an NFT!"
Re: (Score:2)
It's really too much. Why do we feel the need to destroy our own folklore?
Because they have power in the minds of people which can be leveraged as psychological weapons in culture wars, and some people are willing to do that.
Really dry material (Score:4, Insightful)
If it's based on some of the stuff from Silmarillion or Unfinished Tales, then it's pretty dry stuff. Also a lot of the Second Age stuff is hard to explain without going through the First Age, which they've never really done on film.
There are some "history of Middle Earth" youtubers that try their best to go through all this material, and it's hit-or-miss despite their best efforts to pad Tolkien's writings. Presenting the forging of the 9, the 7, the One Ring, and the 3 Elven rings in any kind of entertaining way is going to be shitshow. Though the debauchery of Numenor could be entertaining.
Re: (Score:2)
If it's based on some of the stuff from Silmarillion or Unfinished Tales, then it's pretty dry stuff.
You could say the same thing about big parts of the Bible. Yet presumably people were still loving and fighting and fucking and dying in the background even while nothing interesting was going on in the text.
Re: (Score:2)
If it's based on some of the stuff from Silmarillion or Unfinished Tales, then it's pretty dry stuff.
You could say the same thing about big parts of the Bible. Yet presumably people were still loving and fighting and fucking and dying in the background even while nothing interesting was going on in the text.
You mean you don't enjoy the book of numbers?
Re: (Score:2)
Hodor! (Score:2, Funny)
Ow, crap, wrong tv show
Some risk, some opportunity for the material. (Score:5, Interesting)
Visual effects in a trailer are a shockingly reliable predictor of writing values, and the ones I saw in the trailer for the series look like run-of-the-mill game graphics. So I expect the stories to be written for a PG-13 / "Marvel" demographic with little or no exposure to Tolkien's deeper mythology. There will likely be references thrown in here and there to the background, but it'll be token callbacks rather than the core animating spirit.
The way such things usually go, excellence is not only missed, but willfully avoided as an obstacle to franchise-building.
Re:Some risk, some opportunity for the material. (Score:5, Insightful)
So I expect the stories to be written for a PG-13 / "Marvel" demographic with little or no exposure to Tolkien's deeper mythology.
What deeper mythology? Seriously? Tolkien rehashed a bunch of existing stuff, from Beowulf to Finnish folk tales, and in that mythos included some deeply entertaining stuff (Hobbit, Lotr), and some bit more hard to read worldbuilding stuff (Silmarillion), and something in between (published in Unfinished Tales and Lost Tales). There are dozens of different versions of the storylines, and he was basically finetuning the thing until the day he died. I've read all of the older stuff up to Unfinished Tales and enjoyed them very much, but I don't understand what "depths" there are.
There's lots of stuff in there and the world is very much consistent, since you brought it up, so is Marvel multiverse (and MCU). Or even, heck, World of Warcraft. Or Wheel of Time. Lots of fantasy world have eons-spanning timelines due to Medieval Stasis effect.
Re: (Score:3)
So I expect the stories to be written for a PG-13 / "Marvel" demographic with little or no exposure to Tolkien's deeper mythology.
What deeper mythology? Seriously? Tolkien rehashed a bunch of existing stuff, from Beowulf to Finnish folk tales, and in that mythos included some deeply entertaining stuff (Hobbit, Lotr), and some bit more hard to read worldbuilding stuff (Silmarillion), and something in between (published in Unfinished Tales and Lost Tales). There are dozens of different versions of the storylines, and he was basically finetuning the thing until the day he died. I've read all of the older stuff up to Unfinished Tales and enjoyed them very much, but I don't understand what "depths" there are.
There's lots of stuff in there and the world is very much consistent, since you brought it up, so is Marvel multiverse (and MCU). Or even, heck, World of Warcraft. Or Wheel of Time. Lots of fantasy world have eons-spanning timelines due to Medieval Stasis effect.
I really enjoyed Unfinished Tales (despite many of them having massive gaps and/or no start or ending). I think a lot of Tolkien's motivation was seeing the rich mythology that many other cultures enjoyed and trying to build the same thing for the English, and to that extent I think he succeeded. As big as LOTR is his greatest contribution was probably how he defined high fantasy as a genre.
Re: (Score:2)
Tolkien wanted to create an ancient myth for the English, since English history doesn't go back all that far ( compared to other peoples like Greeks, Iranians, Chinese, Egyptians, and Assyrians ). He borrowed from the various legends of those who inhabited the British Isles ( Saxons, Celts, Vikings, etc...) and being as he was a devout Catholic borrowed much from Christian mysticism ( anyone who is familiar with traditional Catholic or Orthodox
Re: (Score:3)
There's lots of stuff in there and the world is very much consistent, since you brought it up, so is Marvel multiverse (and MCU). Or even, heck, World of Warcraft. Or Wheel of Time. Lots of fantasy world have eons-spanning timelines due to Medieval Stasis effect.
I've seen maybe 3 or 4 Marvel movies in the last 20 years and they are not consistent with each other whatsoever. Why would they be? There's no single person writing all the movies or controlling the franchise? The only common thread is the desire for another blockbuster payday. The only time you get consistency in a fictional universe is when it's written / controlled largely by a single person.
Re:Some risk, some opportunity for the material. (Score:4, Insightful)
Tolkien sits at the same table as Shakespeare and Homer.
Re: (Score:2)
Well he did establish an entire genre of fiction.
Yeah, sure, his work is based on Northern European mythology but pretty much everything is based on something and the modern genre of Fantasy clearly starts with him.
Re: (Score:2)
I happen to be rewatching right now (just need to finish up rotk) and I'm still pissed about what Jackson did to Faramir, which fucks up the whole Denethor storyline really. Most changes are made for shit reasons, just so they can throw some more effects in there. They probably took the hobbits toward Gondor just so they could show some otherwise unused angles on the Causeway Forts and justify that part of their CG budget. It certainly added nothing to the story, and oh yeah, it didn't actually make any sen
Re: (Score:2)
My one big gripe with Jackson's Lord of the Rings trilogy was Gimli. He took one of Middle Earth's greatest warriors and turned him into bungling, not terrible funny, comic relief.
Re: (Score:2)
Gimli had to play either the comic relief or the straight man in several scenes in the books too, but that was balanced out by what a badass he was — which was kind of glossed over in the films. You got one shot of him counting kills in the twenties at Helm's Deep and that was about it...
Re: (Score:2)
Even in the Battle of Helm's deep he's a bumbling twit. Every other character present is performing great feats of heroism while Gimli stumbles about the battlefield getting most of his kills by accident. He's basically Jar Jar in the final battle of episode 1.
Re: (Score:2)
I wasn't keen on the Jackson movies either. They left a lot to be desired.
Re: (Score:2)
We just watched the "Tolkien edit" of the hobbit and I've gotta say... they could have hacked out at least another half hour, if not another hour. And that's already around half length.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah like WHERE was Tom Bombadil??
Re: (Score:2)
That's a fair critique and I think I more or less agree. I would say though that "vision" (for lack of a better term) is important for a writer as well and I think he clearly did well there given his work's cultural impact.
Re: (Score:2)
On the one hand, it's good the Tolkien estate has taken a hard line on the usual studio bullshit, and Amazon has to avoid contradicting anything in the literature. But since they're being allowed to set the series in a time with minimal canon to draw on, I expect it to be not much more than fan-fic.
Visual effects in a trailer are a shockingly reliable predictor of writing values, and the ones I saw in the trailer for the series look like run-of-the-mill game graphics. So I expect the stories to be written for a PG-13 / "Marvel" demographic with little or no exposure to Tolkien's deeper mythology. There will likely be references thrown in here and there to the background, but it'll be token callbacks rather than the core animating spirit.
The way such things usually go, excellence is not only missed, but willfully avoided as an obstacle to franchise-building.
I wouldn't say there's "minimal canon" since Tolkien wrote a lot more than the Hobbit and LOTR [wikipedia.org], but within that canon I think there's enough variety that you can do a lot of different stories.
A series sounds like (Score:2)
A great way to ruin LOTR. They'd better get it right.
Also of course the PR is going to have glowing reviews from 'fans'. I'll wait until real people see it
Silmarillion, or retconning Tolkien? (Score:2)
Predictions (Score:2)
2. There will be sex and nudity.
3. It will suck,
Surprising (Score:2)
What they means is (Score:2)
They have the rights to do stuff that does not affect the existing story or turn the story universe on its head.
By default this means moving away from existing characters and perhaps only mentioning them in passing or in brief.
It can still be hugely cool and I hope they do a good job of it. Moving away from the already told story is likely a very good thing; we don't need more very scary and all-power but incompetent evil lords (Sauron) that use to serve even more powerful yet incompetent evil master (M
"vibrant" (Score:2)
This is a world that's very vibrant.
Ah yes, "vibrant", just what every place and every thing needs more of! (I always know the safest neighborhood to park my car in is the "vibrant" one, for example!)
So much better than that dead, lifeless world, you know, with no life or richness, that Tolkien created. Thanks Amazon!
Unseen"? (Score:2)
What do they mean "unseen"? Did they have their mind's eye spiked with a burnt-ended toothpick when they were reading the material for the last 40 years? Sure, it's incomplete, and inconsistently edited - which part of "work in progress" wasn't clear? - but the outline of the universe is clear, and a lot of canon scenes/ stories.
They'll be mining that literary estate for decades to come.
Re: (Score:2)
I loved having the opportunity to explore that unseen history.
What do they mean "unseen"? Did they have their mind's eye spiked with a burnt-ended toothpick when they were reading the material for the last 40 years?
0.8% of people have absent imagery aphantasia.
I for one love reading, but I do not get pictures of things when I read. I literally don't see them when I imagine them.
I'm sure (Score:3, Insightful)
...what we will discover is
- how a huge chunk of the people of Middle earth will turn out to have been bi, trans, genderfluid, and cross dressers
- all of the important heroes will be women, however that happens to be defined
- how the population will look astonishingly like a Benetton ad with just the *right* mix of ethnicities and skin colors
- there will be a curiously consistent inverse relationship between melanin and evilness
Re: (Score:2)
If it turns out that you're incorrect about this, will you re-examine what made you say this and think about whether your preconceived notions are correct?
Re:I'm sure (Score:5, Insightful)
If it doesn't happen, then it is a fluke.
This is pretty much the trend we're seeing in ALL new content being put out.
It's getting really old, really fast.
Re: (Score:3)
Here's the trailer: https://youtu.be/v7v1hIkYH24 [youtu.be]
I see one guy who might be black, it's dark and hard to tell. One woman who may be non-white. All other characters are white, and the world looks like Europe.
Looking at the cast list confirms this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
As for the relationship between skin tone and evilness, in the novels Tolkien often describes evil creatures as having dark skin. The orks are the most well known example, and of course they are corrupted elves and elves have extreme
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think I need any other rebuttal than that 'other' Amazon series about a widely regarded fantasy work: The Wheel of Time
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7... [imdb.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Shadow and Bone [imdb.com] works without being so Caucasian-centric. But it more of a Victorian-style fantasy setting than a medieval one, not that's important.
Re: (Score:2)
As for the relationship between skin tone and evilness, in the novels Tolkien often describes evil creatures as having dark skin. The orks are the most well known example, and of course they are corrupted elves and elves have extremely pale white skin. I would be surprised if they changed that, given the trailer seems to have gone for a white blond look for the heroes.
Don't forget the Easterlings https://lotr.fandom.com/wiki/E... [fandom.com] . The only major faction of humans who were with Sauron were also the only major human faction that was non-white (at least as far as I remember)
Re: (Score:2)
Oh good, another idiot bringing their idiot culture war in to bother the rest of us. Thanks for that!
Previews (Score:2)
When "critics" go absolutely nuts over a preview, it's usually not a good sign.
Will they explain the Eagles? (Score:3)
I'd like an episode dedicated to J. R. R. Tolkien's official answer [youtube.com] to why the Eagles didn't fly the Fellowship to Mordor.
Tryhard PR (Score:2)
Amazon is trying way too hard to make this appeal to everyone except existing Tolkien fans, and ensure that the half billion dollars they spent on this doesn't go up in flames upon release. They've managed to make sure all the marketing reeks of astroturf.
We can tell from the released footage that Elrond and Galadriel have been body-swapped.
I don't think a black dwarf intrinsically goes against canon, but they need to explain which clan she comes from. There are six possible viable answers, the wrong answ
"JRR Tolkien fans" (Score:3)
Is this the same super fans preview that a video was made about, that got ratio-ed so hard that Amazon took it down?
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Amazon has appropriated Tolkien's life's work and are using it to pander to the alphabet people.
As one of those "alphabet people", I'm not feeling the pandering. LOTR always seemed to me like a thinly veiled military drama metaphor, set in a fantasy world. I recall many years ago my grandmother was visiting at my father's place, and he had one of the movies playing on the TV at the time. After having watched for a bit, my grandmother then said to me:
G: "I've been watching this movie for what seems like hours. They schlepped over here, then they schlepped over there, what is this movie even about?"
Re: A good example of cultural appropriation (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Amazon has appropriated Tolkien's life's work and are using it to pander to the alphabet people.
As one of those "alphabet people", I'm not feeling the pandering. LOTR always seemed to me like a thinly veiled military drama metaphor, set in a fantasy world.
It's a Norse based mythology.
Now from the rest of your post, you don't seem to care for it. Is it your goal that LOTR be ruined?
Hammering 2022 woke values on it does seem to be an attempt to do that.
These folks who have been retconning and waking entertainment would be so much better served by creating their own mythos and running with that rather than appropriating previous work and changing it to their mores.
Because so far, it is looking like they don't have that ability.
Re: (Score:2)
People complain about "retconning" as if it's a relatively new thing, invented for the purpose of making beloved tales into woke fantasies. No; it's been going on for a long time. When I was a kid, serial heroes were routinely resurrected with sketchy (or no) explanation. Arthur Conan Doyle brought Sherlock Holmes back after killing him in the 1894 short story "The Final Problem". Perhaps the most famous example in fairly recent history is "Who Shot JR?" from the TV series Dallas, 42 years ago. "Never mind,
Re: (Score:2)
As one of those "alphabet people", I'm not feeling the pandering.
That's the nature of "pandering," isn't it? It's like compromise: everyone hates the result but can barely live with it.
Re: (Score:2)
Good thing whether someone is pandering or not is a subjective judgement for every individual to make.
I've gotta remember when writing things online that people are just going to assume I'm being facetious unless I spell it out. "Not feeling" in this context means "the pandering isn't having the desired effect". I'm a gay man, and putting LGBTQ+ characters/situations into a bad television show does not magically improve my opinion about said television show. I'd gladly accept less representation in the current crop of what passes for Star Trek, if the writing improved.
The rest of what I wrote about my gr
Re: (Score:2)
0. There was a time when comics were targeted to a specific audience, one that reveled in conventional hetero sexuality, fantasy to them. Has that time passed? Possibly I suppose.
1. I read this: 'Society has been shifting towards where they should have been a long time ago. Which is to not worry about someone's sexual preferences or orientation.'. And I'm lost. What universe does this describe? Not one I live in, nor one I even hear, read, or see, not I even hear of being referenced as real. And I would pre
Re:A good example of cultural appropriation (Score:5, Interesting)
Not least because there is a way to be inclusive while still being true to the lore - Easterlings and Haradrim are described as dark, swarthy etc. To the Westerlings they well be, appearing savage & cruel but that's one point of view. There is plenty of opportunity to tell a story from their own, to perhaps explain their ways & their lore, how they were corrupted and dominated by Sauron, how perhaps some of them resisted, or put up battle that they tragically lost.
But instead we'll probably get black hobbits, and bisexual dwarves. Because who gives a fuck? Certainly not the show runners.
Re: (Score:2)
But instead we'll probably [...] bisexual dwarves.
How would you know?
Re: (Score:2)
Not least because there is a way to be inclusive while still being true to the lore
Showrunners don't care about the lore (or have too little rights to use any of the lore they need?)
There are tons of new characters, there are (proto)hobbits, there is dwarven family drama (between father-and-son Durin, no less, even though Durin line are all unique reincarnations).
Why couldn't they just do a non-Tolkien story which isn't bound by any rules?
Re: (Score:2)
"the alphabet people"
Tolkien created multiple writing systems. He is literally an alphabet person.
Re: (Score:2)
"the alphabet people"
Tolkien created multiple writing systems. He is literally an alphabet person.
Not to mention he literally wrote the dictionary.
Re: (Score:2)
Amazon has appropriated Tolkien's life's work and are using it to pander to the alphabet people. Talk about cultural appropriation.
This is truth. Making a "Lord of the Rings Prequel with 2022 woke values is simply purposely destroying Tolkien's work.
Where did all of the diversity characters go after the prequel?
And force fitting 2022 woke western world values onto what is a Nordic Mythology is disconcerting.
Now I have no issue with a mythology that is built from the ground up to be whatever the people with woke values desire. But taking an essentially completed work and changing it to conform to their particular values is indee
Re: (Score:2)
"true to the Silmarillion"
Yeah, I was a bit surprised when I heard the studio was 'creating' a historical Middle Earth. Tolkien kinda created more than enough, I thought to myself.
This is one franchise I may well choose to ignore. And I'm very tolerant of the cultural appropriation most of these franchises go through.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
how can it be "true to the Silmarillion" when the only license they have is for the appendix sections of LOTR, they can't even touch Unfinished Tales not to mention the entire catalog of History of Middle Earth
Missed the sarcasm, perhaps? There is no way that a 2022 sensibilities version of Tolkien's novels could be true to the Silmarillion.
Not even true to the Hobbit and LOTR.
Which is why I believe they should have created their own mythology. In that world, the possibilities are endless. You could even have tribes of gay or transgender elves, who possibly reproduce via magick. Or if not that, since a certain percentage of humans are gay or trans anyhow, just have them join the tribe when they find it appr
Re: (Score:2)
"true to the Silmarillion"
Yeah, I was a bit surprised when I heard the studio was 'creating' a historical Middle Earth. Tolkien kinda created more than enough, I thought to myself.
This is one franchise I may well choose to ignore. And I'm very tolerant of the cultural appropriation most of these franchises go through.
I don't have anything against what would be called fanfic. But it's hard to make interesting stories when you have to deal with the pre LOTR world of the Silmarillion.
A lot of people didn't like it, bit I enjoyed it for what it was. A history book written more as a history book than an adventure.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Nobody really cares what you've personally read.
Re: (Score:3)
In this case, it's about books the movies' authors haven't read. They've apparently googled a list of main characters, but didn't bother even with the plot summary.
Re: (Score:2)
That's nothing new. They'll bring in consultants to do all that for them.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm excited. :)
Re: (Score:2)
It's odd how those invited talk a great deal about the show runners, far less about what they actually saw onscreen. That and assuring us they are less worried after their junket.
Whenever they do something like this everyone in the audience sign NDAs that forbid them from revealing content. They're not talking about what they saw on screen because they aren't allowed to not because of some horrible woke conspiracy.
Re: Strange, almost scripted (Score:2)
They don't have to disclose plot elements to talk about what they saw. I'm not suggesting a conspiracy theory. It's more likely Amazon is doing damage control due to the negative responses to earlier promotional content.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, I don't know what to tell you. To me their comments are what I expect from any early screening.
Re: Strange, almost scripted (Score:2)
Yeah, I suppose we'll see how it works out. Could be a good show, could be a bad one.
Re: (Score:2)
Pretty much, the entire problem with DEI pushes in a nutshell; at least where it comes to culture and the arts, movies, books, tv, music, visual arts, architecture, etc.
We get some warmed over 'Sword and sorcery' fantasy story told umpteen million times with all of its distinctly European social structures and Hebraic moral philosophies save for some odd post modernist sexual revolution stuff and a now rainbow colored cast. Everyone has a nice circle jerk session and congratulates themselves says "see there