Spotify's Biggest Update in Over a Decade Includes 'Entirely New' Home Feed, CEO Says (cbsnews.com) 46
A brand new version of Spotify is being unveiled to millions of subscribers on Wednesday, marking the largest change to the platform since it became available on phones more than a decade ago. From a report: In an exclusive interview airing Thursday on "CBS Mornings," Spotify's CEO and founder, Daniel Ek, said the updates include an "entirely new" home feed that is "completely redesigned from the ground up." "You'll see Spotify, I think, come alive. You're gonna see a lot more interactive content," he said. The popular digital music streaming service allows users to access a vast library of songs and podcasts. Ek said with the change, users will be able to see recommended content in the form of clips, and other visual components.
Can someone kindly recap Spotify? (Score:2)
[Anyone smell a brain fart? Me neither and you don't need to search for it. Really.]
Anyway, I do know the name but can't remember anything about the Website. However I remember a bad smell of some sort, so I don't want to do the obvious and visit the website. The article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org] on Wikipedia says it's mostly about music, which probably explains my lack of interest. Tin ear problems...
Is there a Spotify fan in the Slashdot house?
Re: (Score:2)
I'm a pretty big fan after completely ignoring it for years, although the app itself has had its issues. Gives me access to a bunch of my favourite music easily at a moments' notice. A completely proprietary service, but it's the music industry so what can you expect.
I'm unlikely to care about the home feed changes though, I usually just search for something or play from my favourites list.
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks and I'd mod informative or interesting if ever I could.
Re: (Score:2)
Is there a Spotify fan in the Slashdot house?
I like Spotify and everyone I know that uses it likes it. I have infinite access to more smooth jazz, and blues in one place than I could ever get from a music store. Same can be said for indy rock. With out Spotify I would never hear some of these bands.
Re: (Score:2)
Same here, jazz AND heavy metal/hardrock/thrash/etc fan. Learned a whole lot of new (old new) bands, and modern performers of both styles.
Yes, it has its drawbacks, like in some mixes too many of the same songs.
If there is really one thing that should improve it is this algorithm for creating playlists. FFS, it should be really be based upon random number generation, not based upon the popularity of songs.
Something else I noted, I turned on AC/DC radio, and only the first song was AC/DC, e.g. with some o
Re: (Score:2)
This, exactly. If it wasn't for Spotify I would have never found Fatburger, Nils, or Mindi Abair, an that is just jazz. Lets not mention Railway Children, Angels & Airwaves, +44. I could go on and on. Thanks to Spotify I have discovered entire genres that I would NEVER have found, Folk Metal comes to mind.
I agree with you on the playlists. I wish it was a little smarter sometimes. I like a kinds of music. When you put on one of the daily playlist it does get kind of annoying when you got Fra
Re: (Score:3)
I, at least, have zero interest in any algorithmically designed playlist. If I want a playlist, I want to personally add each and every song or album to it.
But that's my preference and my rejection of a faceless company's recommendations; you're quite free to use the app differently than I do.
Re: (Score:2)
Spotify tends to have everything popular, however most of my music (metal) I find on Bandcamp and a good amount of it is not on Spotify for whatever reason. Bandcamp also allows you to purchase albums if you are a collector type. After Bandcamp I'll go to YouTube as I prefer the simpler interface and, as a last resort, will use Spotify (which doesn't suck).
Re: (Score:2)
Mostly the ACK, but strong concurrence on the negative evaluation of YouTube. There is no gravity. YouTube just...
Re: (Score:2)
The simplest explanation is that it's Netflix for music.
Who needs it? (Score:2)
I have my playlists of those songs...or at times I'll pick a song from the 60's-early 90's and hit the radio button on Spotify and see if it picks out any cuts I forgot about or deep ones I might have missed back then.
I really don't need much more
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"Man who says he has a present playlist he spends years developing and no longer uses a UI can't understand why other people would use a UI."
Did I sum up your post correctly? I guarantee you most Spotify users do not sit there playing the same age old playlist over and over again. These services all now have similar libraries and now live and die on their interface and information and suggestions their platform makes. You're not the target market.
Re: (Score:2)
No, I have several playlists....and no, I never mentioned
What a Coincidence... (Score:2)
That's a fun coincidence. I just disabled Spotify on my out of the box windows builds.
--
Coincidence is God's way of remaining anonymous. - Albert Einstein
Re: (Score:2)
I don't even know what Spotify is. Is it a web site that creates dogs?
Don't ask and you shall receive (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Audacious playing my ripped CDs from my own server, in my case.
Re: (Score:2)
The **only** thing I want it to do is play from a playlist, randomly. Don't play what you think I want to hear. Take my playlist, and play it randomly. I'm sick of algorithms always deciding that they're smarter than I am and know what I want to see/hear/read.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I got some big playlists, and I have the impression when these are played randomly that it still prefers to place more popular things first in the queue, or e.g. recently added things, instead of indeed being truly random.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I want stuff like this. I use playlists but sometimes I just want to listen to music IN MY BROADLY DEFINED TASTE but without having to pick and choose. So I use radio feature in Spotify.
Yes, 'cause ... (Score:2)
You're gonna see a lot more interactive content, ...
That's what I want when I want to *listen* to music. That interactive content will really liven up my run, or drive ... Not to mention eat my cell data. Yay! /sarcasm
Interactive? (Score:2)
Spotify would do well to realise they are a commercial success for one main reason, commercial FM radio started playing too many adverts. I recall the day I commuted to work an
Re: (Score:2)
Well that is last thing I want when I am driving.
Just as well that Spotify is only ever used while driving. No chance some people could be browsing through the music on their couch, or trying to find the lyrics to a song at a party or something like that.
Are you American? You should go visit another country and it may blow your mind to see that the entirety of life does not actually happen behind the wheel of a car. ... Well the obvious drunk drive in induced conception excepted of course.
Re: (Score:2)
Sure, your use case applies for some users, I but would bet the vast majority of users are using Spotify for background music while doing something else such as driving, exercising or working. I chose driving as that the more common use case for me and the one where interactivity is genuine issue.
Re: Interactive? (Score:2)
"bUt iT's iNtErAcTiVe"- gotta love that early 1990s way of marketing.
I think things have gotten too "interactive", and I missed the days where being able to script things to do stuff AUTOMATICALLY was a big selling point.
Trash service. (Score:2)
Recommend? (Score:2)
Recommendations NOT influenced in any way by the recording industry? Ok. Otherwise, "sponsored" bs can rot somewhere else.
How about playing what I want (Score:2)
Did they fix podcasts? (Score:2)
Heart meet stomach (Score:2)
"Spotify's Biggest Update in Over a Decade Includes 'Entirely New' Home Feed, CEO Says"
A headline like this these days automatically translates in my mind to "things have been made worse and hard to use, users are crying out in a chorus of complaints."
I don't use Spotify, but whevever someone "improves the user experience", they normally fuck things up way more than improving anything.
Exactly the opposite than what is desired (Score:2)
My wife likes to have music playing 24x7 and she is very particular about her music. I have tried to set up a few old devices (old Samsung phone, iPod, iPad, etc) connected to the Bose system but either their App won't install on an older device or it just stops after not having enough user interaction. We don't want to use a service where we have to play with the UI every few hours just to keep it streaming music. Now they want to add all kinds of cruft to the play list that we don't want. Sorry Spotify, i
nice nice nice (Score:1)