Disney World Is Shutting Down Its $2,500-a-Night Star Wars-Themed Hotel (npr.org) 330
Thelasko writes: A Star Wars-themed hotel at Walt Disney World is being shut down about a year after opening, the company announced. The hotel, which is marketed as a two-night immersive experience, will take its last bookings Sep. 28 to 30. New bookings are being paused until May 26 to first accommodate those who made reservations after September. [...] The two-night packages start at about $4,800 for two people, and go up to $5,299 for two adults and one child and $5,999 for three adults and one child. Prices include lodging, meals and admission to Hollywood Studios. Upon arriving, guests enter a launch pod to board the Halcyon starcruiser, stay in a room with a space view and are able to interact with the franchise's characters throughout the ship.
Price (Score:2)
Why not just lower the price?
Re:Price (Score:5, Insightful)
There are a couple of possibilities.
1. Cost of providing the service is actually closer to $2500 than people care to admit.
2. Lowering price would reduce profits
3. Current political climate reduces the desire to take such price cuts.
4. They want to stem the bleeding while giving someone the blame.
Re:Price (Score:5, Funny)
For $2,500 I could get pegged in the ass by a top shelf Leia Organa impersonator while being spoon fed yogurt by someone in an equally impressive Jabba costume and still have enough money leftover for a small cocaine party for everyone involved and sufficient liquor to never have to remember any of it. I don't know if the Disney experience could quite live up.
Re: (Score:2)
I can imagine getting it right, but its a lot easier to get it wrong. For many fans the later star wars movies were considered to be pretty poor - which shows its possible to spend hundreds of millions of $ and not make something that a lot of die hard fans want.
An immersive
Re: Price (Score:2)
"There are a lot of wealthy nerds"
Great. A very select few frolic around in Playland while most are busting their asses off trying to stay above water. And a lot of them are nerds.
People who won life's lottery and was born with a silver spoon in their mouth do not intetest me much. In fact, I find them quite revolting.
Re: (Score:2)
May I have the phone number for that party group please?
Re: (Score:3)
It wasn't just a hotel, it was an immersive experience, 24/7. So there wasn't a 'night crew'. I'd say from the article I read that it was closer to a 24/7 park ride than just a Star Wars themed hotel.
[John]
Re: (Score:2)
I did it in 2022. Very cool.
Re: (Score:2)
I was wondering the same thing. The cost of building it is a sunk cost and irrelevant now, so what matters is the operational margin. If they could keep it full, what is the minimum price where they break even? Would lowering the price to something above that result in keeping it full? If so, then that's a pretty simple solution.
However, there's also the opportunity cost if they have some alternate plan for the site. What if they drop the cruise/LARP aspect and just treat it as a high-end Star Wars the
Re: Price (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
When I went, my reservations were 7 months in the future.
The problem, is that at the current price, it's not enough for them to hit their profitability target.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not just the price (which is outrageous). It's not even Star Wars themed. It's Disney Star Wars themed. Nobody gives a shit about the Disney trilogy.
Re: (Score:2)
"on their own land" political much? Most land owners have to get permits to build anything, from a fence to a pool to a garage... and if you don't know that, well... now you do.
Re: Price (Score:2)
Because of micromanaging dictators that really want us to have to ask for permission to go to the bathroom. But more about money flow, and creating jobs for micromanagers because we gutted our manufacturing base.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
typical leftist bullshit, its always someone elses fault
Gee. I wonder what short-fingered orange narcissist they learned that from.
Re: (Score:3)
I'm confused. Your post feels like you're disagreeing with squiggleslash but then your description of the situation agrees perfectly with "not economic". Do you have a point beyond ranting about leftists?
Re: Price (Score:2)
More and more Americans are struggling to put food on the table, or put gas in the car. Especially when some dinky-donk shit jumps off on the other side of the world because of some mental case dictator and prices skyrocket in America as a result.
I'm starting to wish America would return to isolationalism. Keep the problems contained wherever they may arise.
Re: (Score:2)
Can't staff the Cantina (Score:3, Insightful)
Should have done it as part of Disney Cruise Lines (Score:5, Interesting)
Something tells me that had they done this with one of their cruise ships, rather than a hotel, it would have been far more popular and no one would have blinked at the cost.
Re: (Score:3)
That's a great idea. Especially if they dedicated just a few decks or only used internal rooms (which normally are the cheapest).
Re: Should have done it as part of Disney Cruise L (Score:2)
There are a lot of ins and outs and whathaveyous. In Florida, you don't have cast members taking up prime real estate while they sleep. But in international waters, you don't need to give them a break at all!
I bet the experience wears thin quickly, and the cruise would turn into a special sort of hell.
Re: (Score:2)
There are a lot of ins and outs and whathaveyous. In Florida, you don't have cast members taking up prime real estate while they sleep. But in international waters, you don't need to give them a break at all!
I bet the experience wears thin quickly, and the cruise would turn into a special sort of hell.
You could certainly make non-star warsy sections of the cruise ship.
But I think the OP has a good idea. Generally speaking, you stay at a hotel to experience the community, not to stay in the hotel. There's a social expectation that's hard to get over. I mean you want to go to Disney World Resort and then stay in the hotel the whole time?
The exact same thing on a cruise ship sounds adventurous, even if the daily itinerary is exactly the same, and the fact that you are actually at sea would make it way more
Re: (Score:2)
Ridiculous Hotel is finally TOAST (Score:2)
Probably Exactly The Right Move. (Score:3)
They avoid the sunk cost fallacy. If it doesn't appear to become profitable at some identifiable point, cut it loose. Doesn't matter how much you spent.
Good for them.
Re: (Score:2)
They avoid the sunk cost fallacy. If it doesn't appear to become profitable at some identifiable point, cut it loose. Doesn't matter how much you spent.
Good for them.
I'm sure it will be re-themed as a regular resort. It's only a sunk cost if they bring in the bulldozers and turn it back over to the alligators.
Too Expensive to Last (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's not even 24/7. The gullible whales who got suckered into this crap have a rigid schedule they have to follow for their 'events,' with access to virtually nothing outside of a bar or something outside of those events.
Re: (Score:2)
I wouldn't want to do it for a minute longer than it lasted, of course.
Almost everyone who does it loves it.
If you're looking to maximize your return on 6 grand this isn't for you. If you have 6 grand to pile up and light on fire for a fucking weird and wild experience for 2 days, then this is for you.
I did, and do this year too, and I didn't regret it the first time, and I suspect I won't this next time.
But I was always pretty sure this wasn't going to be something that lasted. They'd nee
Well (Score:2, Troll)
cost cutting idea: skimp on costumes (Score:2)
look fellas, no need to be hasty, it's a good idea, just needs a bit of re-jiggering...
let's go with only 2 characters from the IP... slave-outfit Leia and post-scratch Padme... and honestly that's all you need, everything else nobody will notice
then we narrow our target demographic to /. types, then...
enough profit to buy the world!
Re: (Score:3)
then we narrow our target demographic to /. types, then...
Oh, no. The grits-cleanup budget alone makes this plan unworkable.
The Star Wars theme is problematic (Score:2)
Most of the time you're going to be a passive observer or it's going to feel incredibly forced. Or worse, the same 'interactivity' is going to be severely scripted and available to the first person to walk into the trigger area at the hourly repetition. I'm confident enough in that to write about it without having gone on this Disney vacation.
But build it into a more passive experience where you're on a fake cruise ship and 'things happen' like a big 24/7 dinner theatre? And maybe design it on the premis
Failure to launch (Score:2)
Why do people rent hotel rooms? (Score:2)
Mainly to sleep in. It's hard to have the "Star Wars Experience" when most of the time you are sleeping.
Also, most people can't afford what amounts to monthy apartment rent pr. night.
Disney new name with be Di$eny! (Score:2)
Disney new name with be Di$eny!
Re: Disney new name with be Di$eny! (Score:2)
Easier than calling them "Forever + 70 years copywright" I suppose.
Re: Disney new name with be Di$eny! (Score:2)
F70C
Re: Disney new name with be Di$eny! (Score:2)
Di$ney
or maybe
Diz-nee
"Sorry folks, but there's profit to be had!"
Re: (Score:2)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Re:Don't say gay (Score:5, Insightful)
It's not like they're reading Henry Miller. In Florida you literally have police investigations of people who show Disney movies in class.
Re:Don't say gay (Score:4)
It boggles my mind that Disney movies - DISNEY MOVIES! - aren't 'clean enough' anymore.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
You seem to have lost your train of thought. How does any of this justify police being called on a teacher who shows a Disney movie?
Re: Don't say gay (Score:5, Insightful)
Not really.
1. LGBTQ and such themes shouldn't be a reason for calling the police. The mere acknowledgement that these people even exist is not abuse or anything like that. If it was actual porn or something, then you might have a point, but then, the police would be equally needed whether it's straight porn, gay/lesbian porn, or any of the other flavors.
2. Disney LGBTQ stuff is so weaksauce that I wouldn't even call it "politically correct" levels. It's the precise amount that Disney thinks will maximize sales and therefore revenue.
Re: (Score:3)
Apparently Lightyear bombed because there was a lesbian couple on screen for literally 1.5 seconds.
They really want to blame everything on "woke".
Re: Don't say gay (Score:5, Informative)
If showing a gay person constitutes "sexual themes" then show does showing a husband and wife. Somehow I can't get upset about any of it. And I mean, my life is pretty empty, but I can think of way less destructive things to fill it with than some politician's culture warrior creed.
Re: Don't say gay (Score:5, Informative)
That's because Disney movies - DISNEY MOVIES are having "alphabet spectrum" (LGBTQQIA+...) themes literally shoved in them for reasons other than to tell a story.
OH NOES!! GAY PEOPLE EXIST!!!
Diverse characters make movies more interesting. It makes the characters deeper, more motivated, and generally makes them more interesting.
Sure, there's times when people go overboard being preachy, but that doesn't seem to be the issue here.
Disney in the past quarter lost 4 million Disney+ subscribers (at $100/yr each, I think), laid off 7,000 workers, list $200M on the movie "Stranger Things" and an untold similar amount of money on the "Buzz Lightyear" movie.
That's nothing to do with having gay people. It's simply that people got through all the Marvel movies on Disney+ and realized there wasn't much else new showing up aside from weekly Marvel or Star Wars series.
More and more people are finding other places to spend their family's limited entertainment dollars, and Disney keeps shoving sexual themes into their products, repelling more and more families...
Cinderella, Beauty and the Beast, Aladdin, Lion King, etc, etc.
There's a romantic relationship at the heart of almost every major Disney film. Where's your objection to "sexual themes" there?
Oh, you only object to the existence of human sexuality when the humans involved are of the same gender.
Oh, and about those 7,000 "good paying jobs" at that proposed Billion dollar campus that Disney cancelled? It is ALL BS - they've been talking about it for two years, never filled a plan, never got construction permits, etc.,
Major projects take more than 2 years to get going, especially when they've probably been slow-walked during the past year as DeSantis started attacking Disney.
Ask yourself:
Who is building new office space as companies embrace remot working?
Who fires 7.000 workers, only to turn around and hire 2,000 more workers?
Who believes Disney, after suffering the recent downturns, enumerated above, really has one billion dollars to fund this "campus" in Florida?
I'll agree that's possible, but you're missing some parts.
Bottom line: I'll believe that the business climate in Florida is the reason when Disney builds it's billion dollar campus and hires 2,000 more worker in another state (like California, for example), but I bet you "dollars to donuts" they have mo such plan to build that 2,000 worker campus anywhere, anytime soon.
You misunderstand: [cnn.com]
The Lake Nona development was envisioned as a regional hub for parks and resorts. Most of the 2,000 jobs, which included roles in finance, technology, and marketing, were set to be moved from California.
Already, around 200 people had moved to Florida, the spokesperson said, and an unspecified number of people had quit.
“We will no longer be asking our employees to relocate,” the memo stated. “For those who have already moved, we will talk to you individually about your situation, including the possibility of moving you back.”
So maaaaaybe they cut the campus just to save money, but this had nothing to do with new hires because they weren't going to be new hires.
Instead, look at the exceedingly obvious. DeSantis, for months, has been using the power of government to attack Disney in retaliation for their constitutionally protects speech as part of his Presidential campaign.
Of course Disney cancelled the campus!!! How friggin stupid would Disney be to build more assets in Florida?!?
Re: Don't say gay (Score:4, Insightful)
Is "being gay" in a film a sexual theme? If so, then why is "being straight" not also a sexual theme? There's no sex going on in these movies!
Re: (Score:2)
This reminds me of a 60 Minutes (?) pieces decades ago. Where this town built a major league (baseball/football) stadium and couldn't get a team. Because the major league association wouldn't let them. It was more important to let the already established teams say, "Hey Mr. Mayor, you either play ball with us or we'll go to that new fancy stadium in another state!" The town was just being used as a bargaining chip. And it worked multiple times. (Sorry for lack of details but this was broadcasted a long time
Re: Don't say gay (Score:3)
Sounds like you are to stupid to have read the original Cinderella, little red riding hood , etc.
They are closer to horror stories than children fairy tales.
Like the old meme. Disney made Zeus a kind caring father figure. And not a raging hormonal rapist, with a short temper.
I suggest you look at the original stories, and compare them to the 1950-1960 versions and find out that Disney took horror stories and made them for kids.
That's what has happened. And idiots like you think woke is new. It is calle
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
I'd be more
Re:Don't say gay (Score:5, Interesting)
https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/16... [cnn.com]
Rodriguez responded, “as a leader in this community, I’m not going to stand by and allow this minority to infiltrate our schools God did put me here.”
classic
Re:Don't say gay (Score:4)
Or Robert Heinlein's *Stranger in a Strange Land*. Not a gay book, sure, but it certainly talks a lot about sex.
Ursula LeGuin's *Left Hand of Darkness* lands you right in the forbidden thinking-about-gender territory. And you can pretty much cross out Samuel R. Delaney.
Re: (Score:3)
Editions of the Diary of Anne Frank that include her comments about other women being pretty have been banned.
Re: (Score:3)
PG but slips were signed by parents that their kids could watch such movies.
[John]
Re: Don't say gay (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
*Some* parents are disgusted. Part of the problem in Florida and some other states is that if one single parent is upset by *anything* that happens in schools they will complain that the gun-shy school board will put a stop to it.
Public schools are NOT indoctrinating school kids about sex, they're not converting kids to be gay. But some parents feel that any mention of homosexuality should be banned. The Disney movie that caused the furor only did so because the main character happened to be gay - and ha
Re: Don't say gay (Score:2)
And youâ(TM)re definitely not talking about the parent on the school board that reneged on her signed agreement, and secretly went behind the teacherâ(TM)s back to narc on the teacher to the state, right?
After all, itâ(TM)s the conservative christians that love freedom, are against overbearing government, are upright, forthright, honest, just, a
Re: Don't say gay (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
First step is to make sure the kids are ignorant, then you can abuse them without the kids realizing that it s wrong.
Re:Don't say gay (Score:4, Insightful)
What DeSantis is doing is using the government to force solutions to problems that do not really exist. Despite what Fox News wants people to think, being gay isn't a choice. Pretending there are no gay people doesn't make them vanish. He should focus more on the 80% of the state that's an absolute shit hole.
Re: (Score:2)
What DeSantis is doing is using the government to force solutions to problems that do not really exist. Despite what Fox News wants people to think, being gay isn't a choice. Pretending there are no gay people doesn't make them vanish. He should focus more on the 80% of the state that's an absolute shit hole.
Clearly you do not understand politics.
If you focus on fixing problems that actually exist, one of two things happens: either you don't fix the problem and you look like a failure, or you fix the problem -leaving you without a reason to keep fighting. Either way you lose.
If you focus on made-up problems, you can keep making progress in the fight against the boogeyman, while constantly dramatizing the problem and demanding more power and more money to fight the good fight against it. More money, more power
Re: (Score:2)
I had a sex education class in 6th grade.
Me too. DeSantis is in the same generation as me, so I'd assume he feels sex ed isn't in need of any updating. Problem is, the sex ed curriculum my generation was given pretended people like me didn't exist, so I ended up going on adult dial-up BBSes with hardcore gay pr0n for lack of age-appropriate resources. Yay for keeping kids safe. I was rather mature for my age, so I didn't get myself into any sort of real world trouble, but seeing as how we don't send straight kids off to xhamster to learn about
Re:Don't say gay (Score:5, Insightful)
Correct response: Not your business or mine.
Also acceptable: I don't know.
Re: (Score:2)
No, the bill's language is so vague it can very easily be applied to just mentioning why a kid has two mom's.
Re: (Score:2)
"ask your parents"
How about "I think I'm gay, but my parents are extremely homophobic. Help."?
Re: (Score:2)
A teacher telling their students about their spouse shouldn't be a crime.
Telling someone who you are shouldn't be a crime.
Re: (Score:2)
If a second grader asks their teacher "where do babies come from?" The ONLY appropriate answer is "Ask your parents."
The moment the teacher starts talking about eggs, firm male genitals, and penetration (to a second grader), they need to be escorted off school property. Period.
What a load of nonsense. Knowing the basics about sex doesn't hurt children. For the most part, most of them already have some idea. They don't live in some magical information vacuum. They hear things from other kids. Sometimes it's pretty bad information, filtered through multiple people like a game of telephone. Now, bad information about sex, that's harmful. There are some truly idiotic things about sex that over-sheltered kids often seem to believe by they time they're teenagers and start clandestinely
Re: (Score:3)
Now, a ninth grader asks the same question of their biology teacher, there are a number of ways the teacher can safely (and appropriately) answer that question:
If a ninth grader is still confused about this subject, your state is likely to have a very high teen pregnancy rate. Kids often start taking romantic interest in the opposite sex in seventh or eighth grade. That's why sex ed typically starts in middle school. By ninth grade, it is entirely too late.
Re: (Score:2)
that is how the Florida bill imagines the topic will be handled
No. For starters, like I said above: the Florida law is not about sex or reproduction. That was the parent's weird tangent, which was the point of my comment. The Florida law is also not constrained to second graders. There is no reason why the law would not effect a ninth grade classroom, the actual language is that it applies to anything that, "is not age appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards." It does not define what those state standards are, or what
Re: (Score:2)
I had already mapped that terrain by hand in 9th grade.
Maybe we should teach them a bit younger than that... or are knocked up 14 year olds your goal?
Re: (Score:2)
The goal is ignorant kids that are easy targets for the molesters.
Re: (Score:2)
Yep, if you want to molest kids, you gotta make sure they have no idea what you're doing. What groomer wants kids to be educated enough to know it is wrong.
Re: (Score:2)
If a second grader asks their teacher "where do babies come from?"
Nobody cared about kids of any age asking their teachers about the birds and the bees. This entire thing started because some crusty old dude in Florida's legislator dungeon literally had an issue that he believed that teenagers were turning queer for internet points on TikTok. Seriously.
Those of us speaking out against Don't Say Gay did so because we always knew it was going to ultimately target LGBTQ+ adolescents, and wouldn't you know it, we were fucking right. [go.com]
I'm also getting so tired of saying it, bu
Re: (Score:2)
You might have to ask that 4 year old for some picture ID first.
Re: What is this about, really? (Score:5, Informative)
The story is, it's not profitable, because occupancy is very low. That said, there are reservations thru the end of the year, but they are shuttering the 100 room hotel "attraction" in September. Anyone with a reservation is being given a few days to re-book their visit before the resort closes, and to give those customers the best chance to get their second-choice date before closing, they are suspending the accepting of any new reservations for a week or so.
They are trying to carefully, respectfully, close this hotel and stop the hemoraging of money.
Re: What is this about, really? (Score:4, Insightful)
maybe if they lowered the price to 500 a night, it would sell better, just saying
Re: (Score:2)
Lowering prices isn't going to fix shit.
It already sells at capacity for 365 days into the future, at prices only a small fraction of people can afford. That's not enough to be profitable.
Re: (Score:2)
It already sells at capacity for 365 days into the future, at prices only a small fraction of people can afford. That's not enough to be profitable.
It obviously does not sell out for 365 days out. Otherwise, they wouldn't be giving people who have bookings for later in the year an opportunity to rebook earlier, because there would be no slots for the next few months to choose from.
Re: What is this about, really? (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't know where you're getting that from because all available evidence points to the opposite, and honestly it sounds like your making all of this shit up. For the first few months it was booked full, but then it really dropped off around August, and they didn't even allow booking into 2023, so your nose is looking pretty long about the 365 day claim pretty quickly.
https://www.disneyfoodblog.com... [disneyfoodblog.com]
Apparently there was some kind of focus group, which doesn't make any sense to do that soon after opening unless there was some kind of problem with attendance. And if that's not enough, they discounted it, and when 2023 was booking there were very few fully booked out dates.
https://thepointsguy.com/news/... [thepointsguy.com]
And with that the bird's nest is already visible on that long nose of yours. I really doubt their attendance was in any way remarkable after the first five months, and I doubt they could afford to pay all of those actors if attendance was anything less than stellar.
And I hope for your sake that the $6,000 admission price included box seats for Diva Plavalaguna's opera.
Re: What is this about, really? (Score:5, Informative)
Oh and in case there's any doubt remaining:
https://www.wsj.com/amp/articl... [wsj.com]
By last fall, Maciel said the crowds at the attraction had dwindled to the point she noticed there would be only one seating for dinner some nights instead of two.
In January, Disney began canceling multiple Starcruiser âoevoyages,â offering to rebook people to future dates at a discount. It announced another round of cancellations in March for the latter half of 2023.
That month, Disney extended 30% discounts for the Starcruiser to Walt Disney World annual passholders for dates in April, May and June. It also offered deals to people who have Disney Visa cards and to members of the Disney Vacation Club timeshare program.
The hotel was expensive to operate in large part because of the so-called cast members who played roles in the immersive experience, said Dennis Speigel, founder and CEO of International Theme Park Services, which consults on projects at amusement parks.
So there you have it. I'm not sure what motivated you to lie in Disney's behalf, but whatever.
Re: (Score:3)
Didn't allow booking into 2023? What the fuck are you talking about?
Dude, you have to *call* for booking, I have no fucking idea what the shit you're reading on disneyfoodblog is even going on about.
Digging yourself deeper dude...I'm not sure where you're getting this from that you have to call, people very often booked them through travel agents who would also arrange their flights, transportation, etc, as is very often the case with Disney vacations, and those are primarily who Disney communicated the changes through as they happened. In addition to the WSJ article I linked that you ignored, here's some more sources reporting exactly the same thing:
https://touringplans.com/blog/... [touringplans.com]
https://www.sfgate. [sfgate.com]
Re: (Score:3)
"No one goes there anymore, it's too crowded!"
Re:Somehow this is... (Score:4, Insightful)
For a change, it's not the Florida-Man-gone-Politician's fault. Disney was trying to bank on a franchise that lost its appeal to the die hard fanboy crowd who would have saved up for months for that kind of experience and they didn't exactly pull in a new, similar zealous crowd.
2500 a person is also not exactly something that's within reach easily for a lot of people these days. Especially young families.
Re: (Score:2)
How much do hotel rooms and a week of passes for a family of four cost for the park?
Re: (Score:2)
How much do hotel rooms and a week of passes for a family of four cost for the park?
This web site: https://www.mousehacking.com/b... [mousehacking.com] says (for a five day stay):
There are a variety of ways to make your Disney World trip as expensive as you’d like. But for this summary, we’ll focus on a family that upgrades to Contemporary, gets park hopper tickets, adds more days of Genie+ and a couple individual Lightning Lanes, upgrades their dining slightly, and does a ticketed event. This trip comes to:
$8,298 for a family of three
$9,958 for a family of four
$11,378 for a family of five
The Galactic Cruiser thing was more of an expensive immersive experience for about 1.5 days and two nights.
Day one starts at 1:00. Day three you're done after breakfast.
Here's the itinerary https://disneyworld.disney.go.... [go.com]
I guess if you're a superfan it's cool, but for me I'd rather it was just another themed hotel
Re: (Score:2)
Were there ever enough fanboys to keep something like that going for more than a year?
Senate Bill 1718 .(or "HAW HAW!", wait that's us) (Score:2)
Here in reality, construction projects are already faltering because migrants aren't coming in to work.
You'd figure Florida would have learned something from Georgia's example a few years ago [theatlantic.com] when crops had to be left rotting in fields because they didn't have the manpower to harvest. Oh wait, what am I thinking, Conservatives learn from others' experience? phah.
I don't even think that's the problem (Score:2)
I bet it was dirt cheap to make though, and I suspect they made good money off it in the wake of the post new movie excitement until people realized "hey, sure I'm excited about Star Wars getting new content, but this *sucks*".
It looked more like a qui
Re: (Score:2)
The major problem was that in addition to the expense, this wasn't really a hotel you'd stay at for the duration of your Florida vacation. If you wanted to fully get your money's worth out of the experience, you'd be spending most of the time inside the "ship." If you wanted to experience the other 3 parks and possibly the other competing attractions (Universal and SeaWorld), you'd still need to book another hotel and go through the hassle of moving to another resort after your "voyage" ends.
As for the bu
Re: (Score:3)
Start with 10%, now remove all the people too busy, remove all the non-fans, remove all the fans bitter about Star Wars being destroyed, remove all the people who can afford it but have sense, remove all the older folks who'd rather go on another cruise, etc, etc, etc, and you're not left with very many people as shown by Disney's poor real world attendance.
Re:No (Score:3)
But this is https://www.reuters.com/busine... [reuters.com]
Rhonda is really owning those libs and trannies now!
If you know what he's doing, he actually is (Score:2)
In politics what's the #1 thing you need? No, it's not charisma, good looks or even fat sacks of donor cash. It's name recognition.
Bobbleheaded Meatball Ronda is doing this to get his name out on the national stage. Here we are, in a thread that's got fuck all to do with him, talking about him. Everyone in the country will know his name.
When the primary gets going he'll drop all this crap and let Disney win their lawsuits
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
I remember when Disney was the villain. Disney has not improved, but it turns out there are much bigger assholes in the room.
Reneging me again, which people are so assholey they make the Vampire lawyers who run Disney look downtrodden.
Re: (Score:2)
DeSantis went to an ivy league school, he can't be dumb enough to pick a fight with a corporation who has literal buildings for of lawyers who protect their copyright and IP. If you paint a mural on a daycare, the mouse will come knocking. https://apnews.com/article/4d9... [apnews.com]
Re: (Score:3)
Disney is still the villain.
But Emperor DeSantis is trying juggle the cognitive dissonance of his voters pretending to be friendly to business, about small government, and someone who can't get hard unless he's holding his copy of the Constitution wrapped in an American flag, while also trying to crush a business.... with the government... by expanding the government, making a mockery of the separation of powers by getting the legislature to pass almost-certainly-unconstitutional Bill
Re: (Score:2)
The world isn't divided into just villains and heroes, although there are exceptional individuals who fall into one or the other category. In particular corporations tend to act amorally, even when the people who work in them are not particularly amoral.
Disney doesn't have any real and sincere convictions LGBTQIA+ issues. It has simply recognized trends in certain target demographics and is responding to those trends in profit maximizing ways. When Disney tried to stop paying Alan Dean Foster royalties on
Re: (Score:2)
Disney doesn't have any real and sincere convictions LGBTQIA+ issues.
This [thewaltdisneycompany.com] would beg to differ.
I know it's trendy to hate on companies for putting out rainbow kitsch during June and then pretending gays don't exist the other 11 months of the year, but Disney actually has been walking the walk on this one. Why? Because a large percentage of their workforce is LGBTQ+.
Re: (Score:2)