Neil Gaiman To Continue 'Good Omens' Story Even If It's Not Renewed For Season 3 (gizmodo.com) 42
In the unfortunate event that Amazon cancels Good Omens, a British fantasy comedy series created by Neil Gaiman, the New York Times bestselling author says a novel would be written to continue where the show left off. For those unaware, Good Omens recently launched season two on Amazon Prime and follows various characters all trying to either encourage or prevent an imminent Armageddon, seen through the eyes of the angel Aziraphale and the demon Crowley. According to Gizmodo's Linda Codega, it "ends on an absolutely devastating cliffhanger. Emotionally speaking." From the report: Neil Gaiman, the co-author of Good Omens (the book) alongside Terry Pratchett and the lead writer on Good Omens (the show), has always been active on Tumblr. Naturally, people have been asking him about that ending -- mostly because Good Omens, for all the hype, hasn't yet been renewed for a third season, and I will reiterate, the ending of season two is heart-wrenching. Gaiman had a lovely answer for one fan [poohbear0915] who asked: "In the unfortunate event that Good Omens is not renewed for a season three, would you consider releasing a script book of what would have happened for the fans to read?" Neil Gaiman responded: "No, I'd write a novel."
Season 2 was great! (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
So..... it seems that it may in fact be ineffable?
Re: Season 2 was great! (Score:2)
I commend you on your masterful use of sarcasm. Rarely have I seen so much packed into so few words.
Re: (Score:3)
I commend you on your masterful use of sarcasm. Rarely have I seen so much packed into so few words.
Well, demons are notoriously bad at determining if something is sarcasm or not, so your comment makes perfect sense.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Its mostly about the aftermath of a failed armagedon, and .... well I wont spoil it, but while it isn't quite as epic as the first season, I think it takes the story in a fairly intreguing path while building on the character arcs of our two protagonists, and its definately building up to something fairly epic for S3 (And it definately does seem like much of it is a setup).
Regardless, S2 has been a critical and popularity hit, so I cant imagine they'd be just canelling one of thier tentpole series so frivol
Re: (Score:2)
particularly since it doesn't seem *that* expensive a production
Haven't seen season 2, but season 1 was extremely expensive. And Amazon has cancelled other high-profile and critically successful shows before. The Tick, for example.
Well all right, that's the only one I know of. I don't know a lot of Amazon shows. I'm still bitter about The Tick though.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Season 2 was great! (Score:2)
Re: Season 2 was great! (Score:2, Flamebait)
Tell me you're a woke retard without telling me you're a woke retard.
There's a difference between an ambiguous relationship or even the occasional unapologetically gay relationship and every single couple in the season (except one bit, not even secondary, couple) being part of the rainbow crew. He was pushing ideology at the expense of the story and there is nothing you can say to deny that.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Uh no (Score:3)
Season 2 was mostly people talking in a bookshop.
Re: (Score:2)
Meh.
I'm a Gaiman fan... and a Pratchett fan... and David Tennant is one of my favorite actors.
That said, season 2 was... meh.
I hope he writes it (Score:1)
Neil and Terry Pratchett's original novel was fantastic; I am often disappointed by tv/cinema adaptations of novels but I loved this one.
However, this Slashdot article is the first time I even hear about season 2! I will binge it tonight, but I can't imagine how many fans like myself might not even be aware of the second season. Perhaps Amazon should have done better at promoting the season!
Either way, I own most of Neil's written works as well as the late Terry Pratchett, I would be first in line for the
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Thanks for that info. Now I do not feel the need to see Season 2. Season 1 was indeed great though.
Re: (Score:2)
Gaiman is one of the most consistently excellent writers out there. I don't remember being disappointed by anything he wrote.
Re: (Score:2)
I like Gaiman's work... (Score:2)
...but I LOVE Pratchett's. If you haven't read any of the Discworld series, start at Number 1, "The Colour of Magic". It isn't the best of the series, but I guarantee you will want to read a lot more of them, so you might as well start at the beginning. The man was an excellent writer, but more important, he was funny as hell.
Re: I like Gaiman's work... (Score:1)
And, after you're done with discword, read his novel "Nation", which he wrote soon after his diagnosis...
The Long Earth series was also quite good.
He wrote until the very end. I miss him dearly
Re: (Score:2)
You and me both, my friend. He's one of my favourite authors, and one of very few who could make me literally laugh out loud when I read his work.
Re: (Score:2)
Amazon is turning into British TV (Score:2)
Every series, no matter how good or popular, gets canceled after 2 seasons.
Except Dr. Who. Also, independent of quality or popularity.
Probably be the same (Score:4, Insightful)
I do hope they stop this absolute woke crap, as it was really distracting and so obvious.
I was surprised at first been then realized, "gays = woke".
Gaiman has been writing stories featuring gay and other spectrum folks as characters since before the word woke ever trigged a single person. He also often features a fairly wide spectrum of ethnicities in his works. In other words this season was not at all unusual for him in regards to what people throw around as "woke" when being critical.
He's the wrong author for you if any of that upsets you as plenty of his material is far more "woke" than this. I've also seen him in modern interviews expressing a lack of use for anyone who calls his work as such. You can expect more of the same.
Re: (Score:3)
That wasnt an endorsement at all but the fact is I wouldnt recommend him to anyone who rants about "woke" in the media unless you're looking for something new to throw a fit over. I would however recommend him to plenty of others as he's a fantastic, critically acclaimed writer of fiction and the only person to win the HUGO award with a comic (although most of his stuff is strictly written word).
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Are you serious? The gay in that show was so understated. The two lesbians never had a moment of intendancy or physical contact. One single kiss defines the confirmed homosexuality of that production. Do you really think straight couples would have been treated with such restraint?
All you're complaining about is the presence of gay in this production. There was nothing excessive about it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I was surprised at first been then realized, "gays = woke".
I don't think that is what was meant. If gays are over-represented on TV, its probably understood that there are just lots of talented gays in the entertainment business, and people write what they know.
However the "wokeness" in Good Omens is next-level, and I too found it a little distracting from what was still one of the best shows on TV. The have female angels including Michael? Angels were God's warriors, and all male, but OK. Blacks? tick. Gays? Tick. But did they really ne
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Hope it will be better... (Score:2)
About that ending (Score:2)
I was in no way *offended* by the two main characters kissing each other, but I wasn't convinced by it.
Aristophile and Crowley have great chemistry as best friends, and their friendship is as important to them as any romantic bond... but there's never been any real sexual tension between them. Not in the book, and not in the show. (Plus, Tennant-as-Crowley gives off very straight vibes).
It seems like the season finale would have worked much better if the kiss had been simply left out. (The scene could ha
Great news (Score:1)