
DC's 'Brighter' Superman Movie Smashes Box Office Expectations (yahoo.com) 60
James Gunn's Superman "appears to be succeeding in rebooting DC Studios and its most iconic comic book franchise," writes The Hollywood Reporter, noting the film is "headed for a possible record domestic box office debut of $115 million to $120 million."
Gunn is in a unique position, being both the film's writer-director and the co-head of the Warner Bros.-owned DC, which he co-runs with Peter Safran. Overseas, Superman is launching to $100 million-plus from 78 markets after earning $40 million midweek from its first raft of international markets for an early global total of $96.5 million through Friday. Superman will be the first superhero film to cross $100 million in its North American bow since Marvel Studios and Ryan Reynolds' Deadpool & Wolverine launched to $211 million in summer 2024 ("superhero fatigue" has become part of the Hollywood lexicon). And it's the first DC title to cross $100 million in eight long years since Wonder Woman debuted to $103.3 million in 2017.
And if the $225 million tentpole comes in north of $116.6 million, it will beat Zack Snyder's 2013 film Man of Steel ($116.7 million) to rank as the biggest domestic launch ever for a solo Superman pic, not adjusted for inflation. Snyder's mash-up Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice scored the biggest DC opening of all time when earning $166.6 million over Easter weekend in 2016... Gunn's movie is only the third Hollywood title of 2025 to launch north of $100 million after fellow Warners tentpole A Minecraft Movie, which opened to $162.8 million, and Disney's live-action Lilo & Stitch, which sewed up $146 million in its debut. Crossing the century mark is no small feat for any movie in the post-pandemic era, and particularly for the troubled superhero genre.
The pic should enjoy a long run thanks to strong word-of-mouth. Critics and audiences alike are embracing the film. The pic earned an A- CinemaScore from moviegoers, the same grade given to Man of Steel and ahead of Superman Returns' B+. The audience score on Rotten Tomatoes is a stellar 94 percent, while the critics' score is a pleasing 82 percent...
Other upcoming DC Studios projects include HBO's Green Lantern series, Lanterns, and a Supergirl movie due out in 2026.
Superman's weekend debut at nearly $130 million domestically smashes early estimates of around $90 million (according to a senior media analyst at Comscore).
And the film also got a positive reaction from the author of the cultural history Superman: The Unauthorized Biography (writing for NPR): Recent attempts to tell live-action Superman stories have shied away from his bright, hopeful, altruistic nature in favor of making him more cool and relatable (read: dark and brooding). That's not who he is; it never has been. Superman is an ideal. He represents the best we can aspire to be. He's not the hero you relate to, à la Peter Parker/Spider-Man's ongoing struggle to pay his rent and buy Aunt May her damn medicine. He's the hero who inspires you, who shows you the way...
It doesn't have to be about slogging through trauma and shame and shadow-selves and endlessly tedious redemption arcs. Sometimes, it's simpler, cleaner, brighter. And also? Not for nothing? More fun.
And if the $225 million tentpole comes in north of $116.6 million, it will beat Zack Snyder's 2013 film Man of Steel ($116.7 million) to rank as the biggest domestic launch ever for a solo Superman pic, not adjusted for inflation. Snyder's mash-up Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice scored the biggest DC opening of all time when earning $166.6 million over Easter weekend in 2016... Gunn's movie is only the third Hollywood title of 2025 to launch north of $100 million after fellow Warners tentpole A Minecraft Movie, which opened to $162.8 million, and Disney's live-action Lilo & Stitch, which sewed up $146 million in its debut. Crossing the century mark is no small feat for any movie in the post-pandemic era, and particularly for the troubled superhero genre.
The pic should enjoy a long run thanks to strong word-of-mouth. Critics and audiences alike are embracing the film. The pic earned an A- CinemaScore from moviegoers, the same grade given to Man of Steel and ahead of Superman Returns' B+. The audience score on Rotten Tomatoes is a stellar 94 percent, while the critics' score is a pleasing 82 percent...
Other upcoming DC Studios projects include HBO's Green Lantern series, Lanterns, and a Supergirl movie due out in 2026.
Superman's weekend debut at nearly $130 million domestically smashes early estimates of around $90 million (according to a senior media analyst at Comscore).
And the film also got a positive reaction from the author of the cultural history Superman: The Unauthorized Biography (writing for NPR): Recent attempts to tell live-action Superman stories have shied away from his bright, hopeful, altruistic nature in favor of making him more cool and relatable (read: dark and brooding). That's not who he is; it never has been. Superman is an ideal. He represents the best we can aspire to be. He's not the hero you relate to, à la Peter Parker/Spider-Man's ongoing struggle to pay his rent and buy Aunt May her damn medicine. He's the hero who inspires you, who shows you the way...
It doesn't have to be about slogging through trauma and shame and shadow-selves and endlessly tedious redemption arcs. Sometimes, it's simpler, cleaner, brighter. And also? Not for nothing? More fun.
So adjusting for (Score:2)
Re: So adjusting for (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
hmmm. maybe too close to home.
OK OK but like a Brightburn sorta version of superman would be nice instead of all this fluff.
Re: So adjusting for (Score:3, Interesting)
How sad we do not have an actual superhero to do this and more.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Wonder Woman wasn't a bad entry into the positive DC superhero(ine) category. (Well, at least the first 4/5ths of the first movie.) But I agree Snyder's Batman-fan viewpoint on everything DC related severely screwed over Superman.
(Unpopular view: this isn't bad per-se, it's great to have different visions for how a character should be, but it doesn't mean it always works. Back to more popular view: Superman is hated by many fans of comics for being an OP goodie-two-shoes, and that's fine, but that doesn't m
How many times? (Score:3, Funny)
How many times are they going to re-tell the same Batman and Superman stories?
It happened THIS way.
No, it happened THAT way.
No, it happened THIS OTHER way.
Make up your fucking minds!
Re: (Score:2)
No need to 're-invent' a Superman origin story for modern audiences.
The daily Superman comic strip was in publication from 1939 to 1966. Just pick your favourite arc(s) from the back catalogue and hire some decent writers to flesh out a 90 minute script. Bonus points, set it in the timeframe the original comics were in, a noir period drama.
c.f. Batman for me was always the hammy 60s TV show - setting him in contemporary times never cut it for me, an Austin Powers style remake is in order.
Pick some of the trippier issues! (Score:2)
I can't help but think about picking some of the trippier comics, where you would be convinced that the writers and illustrators were on the good drugs.
Things like Superman having the power to create miniature duplicates, breath hallucigens, that sort of thing.
Re: (Score:2)
Although such a big box office implies a lot of other viewers too.
Re: (Score:2)
Movie studios gamble millions of dollars on a movie. Those are businessmen who want to maximize their possibility of success. So: Bet on some new thing nobody has heard of, OR bet on something everyone knows, has a built-in audience that will take the time to see it, and has shown success in the past? Which would you put your money on?
Re: (Score:2)
At least once more, just to annoy you.
Re: How many times? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Make up your fucking minds!
Why does anyone need to make up their mind? This isn't a history lesson. This is fantasy. Fantasy of people with different opinions on how it played out.
This is good (Score:4, Insightful)
Some times you just want to be entertained, especially when the world seems like it's getting shittier.
I don't need another superhero movie where it spends most of its time trying to depress me. It's OK to go 'full comic', drop the grimdark, and just have fun.
Re: (Score:1)
I wonder when the idiots think Superman went "woke"? Is the woke in the building right now?
Re: (Score:2)
It's woke garbage. It will not be getting my dollars.
Superman originated as the ultimate Good Samaritan. He stayed that way for a long time. Too bad MAGA don't like good people.
This. Also, note this article, [msnbc.com] which talks about how Republicans of the past would have embraced the ethos of Superman.
It's sad that we now live in a world where giving a shit about someone makes you suspect.
Re: (Score:3)
Reviews in all DPG Media outlets were really bad.
Why do we care about reviews from the Defense Planning Guidance committee?
Make. Something. New. (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
It is astonishing to me that a studio would put itself into that kind of position. Especially over something as lame as Superman.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, it's not as risky as it sounds. The studios use "Hollywood Accounting" tricks to make it appear as if they are losing money when in fact they are raking it in. These gross numbers are just part of the smoke-and-mirrors.
I don't know what these tricks actually are, of course, as I am not in a position to know. But I have read that they are along the lines of: part of making this movie involves building a bunch of wooden props. So the studio contracts with a company to build those props. The company i
Re: (Score:2)
Considering the $200M opening weekend this is having and it's total run and then worldwide, this I bet will quietly approach or even pass $1B in the next 12 weeks if not sooner. That kind of take isn't all that uncommon these days, there were three $1B pictures in 2024.
Also I imagine this is something of a "loss leader" film, this has to be a big deal since this is really the DC tentpole to this new attempt ("I'm sure DC won't fuck this one up" [youtu.be]) at their cinematic universe so they're probably more concerne
Re: (Score:2)
Yours is an example of shooting the messenger, while not addressing the message. At least someone recognized what's important.
Re: Superhero ethics in the modern world. (Score:2)
I almost never agree with that guy but there is entirely no point in making a post where you just paste an AI response. That post is worth about as much as the swastika spam that used to be so common here. It just takes up space and adds nothing to the discussion. Trolls are more interesting.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
But is it incorrect?
Re: (Score:2)
Yes it is incorrect. Blurs the line between reality and fiction, and totally lacks a moral compass. It says because Superman refuses to kill, he is out of sync with the times, and that there would be public backlash because "pragmatic, more violent" solutions are "expected". Written like a total sociopath.
Re: (Score:2)
I hate relying to AI slop, but there is a more interesting argument that it doesn't address here.
Imagine Superman appeared in the real world, today. There would be immense pressure on him to resolve current on-going conflicts. The situation in Ukraine is perhaps one of the easier ones, with Putin being the clear bad guy. What about in Palestine though? One side is committing genocide, while accusing the other of terrorism. Superman would be accused of anti-semitism the moment he got involved. Would be imple
Re: (Score:2)
One of my favourite moments of the Reeve films was when 'bad' Clark fixed the leaning tower of Pisa.
Difficult problems require pragmatic solutions. Too much Kryptonite could kill him, smaller doses might regulate his messiah complex.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Was Superman woke when he went after the Klan? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Superman is not an interesting character (Score:3)
A mostly uninteresting superhero. This perfect man, with perfect super powers and is all powerful gets occasionally challenged a little bit.
Give me batman or something any day. No wonder they have to keep rebooting superman, it's just not an interesting story. Sounds like this one did fine (not inflation adjusted numbers of course) cause its summer
Re: (Score:2)
A mostly uninteresting superhero. This perfect man, with perfect super powers
Agreed. He has it too easy, except for Kryptonite -- and good luck finding some of that.
Give me batman or something any day.
Can't agree here, as it's the opposite problem: Batman is just a rich guy with expensive toys (not unlike Iron Man). No superpowers whatsoever. How are they even considered superheroes?
But I have to admit that the Batmobile in the 1960s Adam West series was totally badass.
Re: (Score:2)
The interesting aspects of Superman are to do with his wanting to be a force for good in a complex world. He can face challenges when the world makes it hard to do the right thing, and he explore what the moral good actually is.
Good. (Score:2)
We need some idealism back. The world got pretty uninspiring.
interesting re-framing of their failures as "super (Score:4, Interesting)
interesting re-framing of their failures as "super hero fatigue"
pretty sure it was a case of shit story with a focus on things that didn't add to the story/action...
We were looking for a fun, action adventure not a hammering over the head about societal issues... You can address those, but don't need to be heavy handed about it.
Re: (Score:1)
You must have missed the era when Superman was punching nazis.
Re: (Score:2)
And the Klan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Progressives may have invented wokeness but conservatives turned it into an artform.
Re: (Score:1)
Progressives may have invented wokeness but conservatives turned it into an artform.
Woke = The Good Samaritan.
Re: (Score:2)
If you can search Twitter I am almost 100% confident you will find someone unironically making that exact argument.
Woke is whatever your imagination requires it to be.
You guys actually want to see this? (Score:2, Insightful)
Brighter pfft (Score:2)
I hate this with a purple passion. As an old fart that grew up in the 70's and 80's that had to live through the shit show that was the SuperFriends era with the wonder twins, the entire reason that DC got bitch slapped by Marvel in that era is because DC was so damn childish and "bright". Marvel covered tough topics and was dark. It was awesome. Marvel also bitchslapped DC at the theaters with their dark take on the superheroes. Prior to Thor Ragnarok, Marvel did humor RIGHT. The injected humor fit with th