

Spotify Publishes AI-Generated Songs From Dead Artists Without Permission (404media.co) 11
Spotify was found publishing AI-generated songs on the official pages of deceased artists like Blaze Foley and Guy Clark -- without permission from their estates or labels. The tracks, flagged for deceptive content and now removed, were uploaded via TikTok's SoundOn distribution platform. "We've flagged the issue to SoundOn, the distributor of the content in question, and it has been removed for violating our Deceptive Content policy," a Spotify spokesperson told 404 Media. From the report: McDonald, who decided to originally upload Foley's music to Spotify in order to share it with more people, told me he never thought that an AI-generated track could appear on Foley's page without his permission. "It's harmful to Blaze's standing that this happened," he said. "It's kind of surprising that Spotify doesn't have a security fix for this type of action, and I think the responsibility is all on Spotify. They could fix this problem. One of their talented software engineers could stop this fraudulent practice in its tracks, if they had the will to do so. And I think they should take that responsibility and do something quickly."
McDonald's suggested fix is not allowing any track to appear on an artist's official Spotify page without allowing the page owner to sign off on it first. "Any real Blaze fan would know, I think, pretty instantly, that this is not Blaze or a Blaze recording," he said. "Then the harm is that the people who don't know Blaze go to the site thinking, maybe this is part of Blaze, when clearly it's not. So again, I think Spotify could easily change some practices. I'm not an engineer, but I think it's pretty easy to stop this from happening in the future."
McDonald's suggested fix is not allowing any track to appear on an artist's official Spotify page without allowing the page owner to sign off on it first. "Any real Blaze fan would know, I think, pretty instantly, that this is not Blaze or a Blaze recording," he said. "Then the harm is that the people who don't know Blaze go to the site thinking, maybe this is part of Blaze, when clearly it's not. So again, I think Spotify could easily change some practices. I'm not an engineer, but I think it's pretty easy to stop this from happening in the future."
Scummy Company is Scummy.... (Score:5, Insightful)
Film at 11.
I doubt this is new (Score:3)
Spot-i-FRY (Score:2)
don't think this can be coded (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
IA would start flagging real people that sound like other real people, if you just compare sound.
Per TFA, the suggestion was to not add any song not approved by the person who admins the musician's official page to that page. That seems a pretty straightforward coding solution for that problem. Spotify could go a step further and require approval of any song claimed to be by a certain artist be approved by the artist or their representative to block any fakes. A bigger challenge is how easy it apparently is to upload songs to Spotify to the point using AI to create music and upload it to Spotify has b
Go back further (Score:2)
What kind of concerto grosso could an AI do? PDQ Bach passed away, is there no successor?
But they ASKED the dead! (Score:2)
They didn't complain for some reason.
This will keep happening (Score:2)
I doubt that Spotify would even tell customers even if they know since their reputation is already in the dumps. And they have already been caught inserting generic in-house garbage into "curated" playlists so I'm sure they're VERY interested in using AI generated slop for themselves.