Review: Oritron NPD3117 Networked DVD Player 145
I tried a computer-based setup and found that my wife and younger children had trouble figuring it all out. At that point I decided I needed to wait for a hardware-based solution that would work well without requiring a clunky computer near the TV.
Enter the OritronHaving decided that nothing was available yet, you can imagine my excitement when I saw a networked DVD player in early October. This was the Oritron NPD3117 Networked DVD Player, also known as their On Media DVD player. This unit plays many audio and video formats -- even photo/JPEG discs. Where it really shines, though, is in its ability to play streaming content over the local network. It can switch between DVD and network content with the click of a button, and is very flexible in supported formats.
What does it do?
But what can this device actually play? Through the disc slot it plays DVD/+-R/+RW, audio CD/-R/-RW, VCD, SVCD, and CDs full of JPEG images or MP3/WMA music. Over the network, it plays MPEG-1 and MPEG-2, JPEG/TIFF/BMP, MP3/WMA, and most AVI files (DivX and XviD for starters). Yes, that's right, it plays DivX over the network! You may ask why it plays AVI-based files only over the network. This is due to the interesting way that the device handles video: any format that is not handled natively is transcoded on the fly on the PC-side. This is why there is a system requirement of 1.2GHz for the PC (though one of my On Media server boxes runs just fine with a 1GHz Athlon). When an AVI file is selected, it converts it to television resolution on-the-fly. No need to pre-convert your files. This means you can watch full-quality on your laptop and desktop (with the higher monitor resolutions), and TV-quality through the unit from the same file. It will not stream DVD's (encrypted or not). It also won't stream a VCD/SVCD per se, but will stream the actual MPEG streams that are encoded for VCD/SVCD when named properly. No proprietary video formats such as Real, QuickTime, or Windows Media Video will play. I do wonder though, if someone were to write appropriate AVI-style codecs for them, if it could be managed somehow ...
The player's interface is mostly well done. I have some complaints that I'll get to in a moment, but overall it works well. Upon first turning on the unit, the player's LED display greets you with "Hello" while the TV shows the logo. It then checks for a DVD in the drive and if present immediately starts to load it. At that point (or if there is no DVD) you can press the On Media button on the remote to switch to network content. (Actually you must wait for this sequence to complete. You can't turn it on and right away press On Media.) The LED display switches to "Online," and lets you browse servers. The next time you switch to On Media mode it will go straight to the last server selected. Going back to the server list is quick and easy. Once a server is chosen it provides options for Pictures, Video, or Music. Selecting one (with the arrows and OK button on the remote) provides you with options for Folders, Playlist, or All. "Folders" shows you all folders on the shared PC. My complaint here is that it flattens them out. All folders appear at root level, which will affect how you name them. "Playlist," of course, lets you select pre-made playlists of files, and "All" shows a single flattened list of all files contained on the server for the chosen media type. Selecting a file starts the media playing.
Music plays, without any fancy visualizations, right on the menu screen. The bottom shows the title information, but you can still continue navigating to other media while it plays. MP3 music can play during a photo slideshow (this is not true of WMA however). Video plays full-screen with media information during the first few seconds along the bottom, or when needed using the Display button. Forward/Reverse works in ten-second intervals (which is also true of music), and no DVD-style slow-mo or zoom options are available. The quality is great, though. Transcoded DivX files look like DVDs (based on source quality of course), and lower quality clips play at the best quality possible. I have played full-screen and widescreen and all ranges of quality and I have never been let down by this unit. It works as advertised.
How does it work?The unit needs to be plugged into your LAN. Instead of providing a CAT5 outlet on the back, it has a PCMCIA slot for a 16-bit wired or wireless 802.11b card. This is not the same as CardBus, which is 32-bit. You must get a 16-bit PC Card and it must be one on the company's approved list. This includes D-Link, Orinoco, Linksys, NetGear, and Microsoft products, so it's not too difficult to find. Best Buy had both the wired and wireless version of the LinkSys cards and may well have had other offerings as well. I was glad they chose this route rather than custom-branded cards at high prices.
I tested the unit with both wired and wireless cards (both from Linksys) and am pleased to report no difference in functionality. I have DHCP setup on my network, and after plugging in the wired card it just works. There are network options screens to enter static information but I didn't test those. After plugging in the wireless card it showed me a list of wireless networks in the vicinity and a simple selection got me online. It supports WEP security (wouldn't want to type all that from the remote though!), and both infrastructure and ad hoc configuration. The wireless option only supports 802.11b, but due to their method of streaming this is not a problem and the content is smooth.
PC setup is a breeze. You install the On Media software on any PC containing sharable content. Sadly there is no non-Windows support. This may be in part due to the complexity of real-time transcoding and the Universal Plug-and-Play used for network communication that plugs into the associated Windows services. Of course there's no reason why ports of the software couldn't be made, but it would not be a simple translation most likely. Once the software is installed you must select folders to scan for content. This can take some time the first time. In addition to crawling through all the folders you choose, it generates TV-friendly versions of all of your images. This is the only case where it must change a format in advance (let me stress though, it never changes any of your original files). The photo resizing is a good thing. I have a 4.2MP camera and I popped in a CD containing full-size photos. It played them all without a hitch, but there was a noticeable delay as it resized them. This is avoided with the streamed photos due to the pre-sizing. The player does not automatically rescan your folders, however you can set a schedule for it to do so. I use this so any files recorded by my PVR are added to the shared files list for easy viewing. The only downside is you can't setup schedules per folders, just one scheduled interval (though it can include as many folders to scan as desired).
Something nice about the network implementation is one PC can serve multiple units, and one unit can connect to multiple PC's (though only one at a time unfortunately). In addition, on the PC side you can see any connected players in the server interface. Since the player's network settings allows you to rename it you could see "Bedroom," "Living Room," etc. based on your setup.
I called the support number before even getting the unit to get some questions answered. The service people were knowledgeable and didn't take too long to answer, but English wasn't their first language. An attempt at more information via email didn't yield much more information, but they responded within a day. If you dig into their websites and manuals you see references to Koss. I'm not sure if they are manufacturing or supporting the unit, or some other role. I just found that interesting.
Pros:- Well laid out remote with hotkeys to jump to music/video/pictures
- All the A/V in/out connectors (composite, S-Video, component, digital and 6-channel audio)
- Wide range of streaming content with smart choice of transcoding
- Easy network setup for wired or wireless environments
- Great quality of all supported media - you wouldn't know it's streamed!
- Would be nice to play even more content types (Ogg Vorbis, Real/QuickTime/WMV)
- Remote feels too light, makes you wonder how tough it is
- Server could be more flexible with scheduling options.
There are a number of things I would like Oritron to work on, but they aren't showstoppers. More granular forward/reverse, remember position in file if you turn off the unit during a movie, and even better choices for navigation would be nice. They make it clear that the unit is firmware upgradeable, though, so some of these things will hopefully be remedied in the future. The actual network-side of the unit is handled by a product called NetPlay which is licensed by Digital5, a company that just creates and licenses network DVD options for other companies. They will be forced to keep innovating to compete with other, similar offerings, so hopefully we will all benefit.
Overall, I would highly recommend the NPD3117. It's what I've been looking for in most areas. I believe there is even more that they could do to make this unit perfect but it's the closest thing I've seen yet. A great unit!
Some technical notes:- As noted above, the AVI streaming only works for certain AVI types. The On Media website lists the exact FourCC codes that are recognized. I'm not sure why there is the FourCC restriction though. Since it uses the codec to transcode the video it shouldn't care what type of file it is. It has occurred to me that by being creative with codecs one could create interesting hacks that would be streamed to the unit. VNC, static internet portal (headlines, weather), internet music, and web cam streaming come to mind. Email me if you are interested in discussing further...
- According to a company spokesman, server software and firmware updates are coming very soon. According to the same person, certain features (like internet radio) will only be added to future products (I hope they don't forget about their early adopters!). Some "logical next step" features like an integrated web browser probably will not be made available due to interface/experience concerns. They want to position themselves as industry leaders in this area so expect more devices to come in the future.
- The server software only imports media from local fixed drives. I wanted the ability to also import/play DivX content from local CD-R's. I solved this by mounting the drive into an empty NTFS folder. Now it just scans that folder like any other folder. There is a brief stutter when starting a video from CD, but then it plays as flawlessly as other media.
Re:I have a networked DVD player (Score:1)
no carbus (Score:1, Insightful)
If it were an audio device, 802.11b is fine, but for streaming video you really need g or a.
Re:no carbus (Score:1, Insightful)
Er, wha? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Er, wha? (Score:1)
Re:no carbus (Score:2)
Seriously... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Seriously... (Score:1)
A Celery 700 to play multimedia? Surely you just, Mr. Feynman!
Re:Seriously... (Score:5, Interesting)
Funny, because that is just what my $150 used XBOX accomplishes for me. It cost me nothing to mod the xbox (besides two solder points) and now I have a device that can stream just about any format from my PC (xbox media player), in addition to a myriad of other functions. Why would you pay more for this DVD player when it accomplishes that much less?
Re:Seriously... (Score:2)
Re:Seriously... (Score:2)
Re:Seriously... (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Seriously... (Score:3, Insightful)
The Oritron is $169.99 at buy.com. You'd be really hard-pressed to build a complete minimal system for this price, unless you already have a lot of the components. Plus you'd need an IR receiver, either off-the-shelf, or home-built.
Re:Seriously... (Score:2)
Dude, take your xbox and crawl back into the dungeon. The OP was talking about building a PC, not about a game console with a dorky front panel plug-in IR receiver. Besides, you can get the xbox way cheaper than that refurbished at various places.
Re:Seriously... (Score:1)
Re:Seriously... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Seriously... (Score:3, Interesting)
it's just a 'easy' way of getting the picture to the tv screen from the computer. though, buying a extra device doesn't sound that cool to me when you can just buy 1 extra cable to extend the tv-out from that pc to the tv
Re:Seriously... (Score:1)
Re:Seriously... (Score:2)
Re:Seriously... (Score:1)
So, if Slashdot gets /,ed (Score:1)
Low End DVD players (Score:5, Insightful)
"cheapo" DVD player manufacturers.
I would imagine this is due to the fact that they have a smaller *perceived* market share, than the big boys (Sony, Phillips, Panasonic, RCA, etc), and they are trying to temp users from those company's share.
On a side note, this makes me wonder, how deep the penetration is for these off-brand players. Are they flooding the market, and just innovating for the hell of it, or do these features really make a difference in most consumer's minds?
Re:Low End DVD players (Score:3, Informative)
Players capable of streaming content off the network, recording television [crutchfield.com], or doing anything else over and above playing DVDs are a niche market. Until they can compete with a $35 basic DVD playe
Re:Low End DVD players (Score:1)
I don't care if everybody drives Mazdas. I like mine.
Re:Low End DVD players (Score:5, Interesting)
I think the "big guys" are trying to refrain from adding too much too quickly, letting the small ones add features that the RIAA/MPAA might bitch about (DIVX/MP3) so that they can serve as lightning rods.
I think they have a very good size market share simply on affordability, it is easier to convince maybe five people to buy $50 player vs. one person buying a $100 player. They also use cheaper decoders and video amps, but the difference may not be apparent on the cheap TVs most people own.
Re:Low End DVD players (Score:3, Interesting)
I really can't say that any of the Chinese players are following any of the contracts, I doubt that a set-top player is allowed to have a network port or expandability that allows one. I think the **AA organizations are more concerned about online trading than set-top players to persue the issue, they just might be "sli
Re:Low End DVD players (Score:2)
Re:Low End DVD players (Score:1)
Not necessarily so: I first saw both Apex and Oritron DVD players at Wal-Mart.
Re:Low End DVD players (Score:2)
There's a better one (Score:4, Informative)
Links? name? (Score:2)
Re:Links? name? (Score:3, Informative)
Here [scan.co.uk] you go
Seems like a better player, depending on the "ugradeability" of the codecs. It says on the page that they will add support for SMB over ethernet, doesn't say whether you can also access files on other shares from the player.
Re:Links? name? (Score:2, Informative)
Product description:
LN5786
Kiss Technology DP-508 DVD Player DIVX V4+/MPEG4/VCD/SVCD/MP3/DVD-RW with 80GB HDD ( 304.33)
Re:There's a better one (Score:2)
I would have to say.. (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:I would have to say.. (Score:1)
Good point! The unit can stream pictures, music, and video. Generally pictures are legit, music is often legit (don't jump all over me...), but video (at least movies) is pretty rarely legit. I have a computer acting as a PVR so some of my content is TV, and I have home movies on there as well. I agree that the big companies expect most content to be illegal so they don't want to help it. As much as I hate the talk of DRM, its one saving grace may be that convergence devices will really come out of the
Re:I would have to say.. (Score:1)
I could definitely see myself using something like this to preview the editing on my daughter's second birthday party we just had, and make sure that all my changes make sense to my wife or family before I commit it to DVD or VHS.
-9mm-
Transcoding MPEG4 seems like a bad idea. (Score:4, Insightful)
So, nice try but no thanks. For now, small form-factor PCs are still a much better idea for home entertainment purposes.
Why can't manufacturers get it right and make a simple interface for a networked living room device that decodes video based on MPlayer codecs (that are extensible) and can also record, TiVO like, on a hard drive or (even better) to a drive on the network? Or, best of all, stream video to a good computer on the network with a lossless codec, where it's buffered it and converted to 1-pass Xvid in real time? Come on people, the technology for all this is available. There are no barriers of legality. Just make the good stuff already.
Re:Transcoding MPEG4 seems like a bad idea. (Score:4, Informative)
You mean like this one [scan.co.uk]? Or, slightly cheaper, this one [scan.co.uk]?
Re:Transcoding MPEG4 seems like a bad idea. (Score:5, Informative)
LiteOn LVD-2001 (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Transcoding MPEG4 seems like a bad idea. (Score:1)
There is a special Windows-only program available from KISS that sets up a dedicated "server" for KISS devices. AFAIK the used protocol is proprietary and very, very limited.
In other words: The ethernet version of the KISS is useless for people with a Linux server.
Re:Transcoding MPEG4 seems like a bad idea. (Score:2)
The Philips DVD 737 uses an own Philips chip with much more power. It does not suffer from such problems.
Re:Transcoding MPEG4 seems like a bad idea. (Score:1)
I agree with you about what it could be. MPlayer codecs would make a lot of sense. Even with just a 5GB hard drive for updates you could do a lot. Transcoding seems to be a good next best thing though, since the player can handle more formats than it ever needs to know about. Transcoding takes surprisingly few resources on the host computer, and the quality looks great. I would have been even happier being able to play more content from the built-in disc slot, but honestly if you have space on your net
Re:Transcoding MPEG4 seems like a bad idea. (Score:2)
Maybe Microsoft could sell an Xbox without a DVD-ROM in a smaller, plainer case with XP media center on it, for about the same price as an Xbox is going for now. Then if you wanted to add a dvdrom you could go get one that was USB or something. (USB is already in the current design, I see no real reason to do anything better. You don't need high-speed devices on an appliance.) They could support digital cameras, both still and video, it could be a big seller. If you implement IE then along with the securit
OK - How Much? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:OK - How Much? (Score:1)
umm link (Score:1, Troll)
but no link?
Re:umm link (Score:2, Informative)
http://www.onmediadvd.com/onmediadvd/Oritron%20Net work%20Media.htm [onmediadvd.com]
A Few Gotchas... (Score:5, Informative)
I'll admit, if the product is all that the review makes it out to be then I would be very interested. Cheap, too--it's selling [buy.com] for $169.99 + free shipping. Of course, you still have to add in your connectivity of choice, but regardless, a more than reasonable price considering some of what I've seen from similar media delivery companies such as Escient [escient.com] and SonicBlue [sonicblue.com].
Unfortunately, it seems that it's only a nice deal if you can get it to work. Three reviewers [reviewcentre.com] over at Review Centre are a little less than satisfied:
A second author had difficulties with networking:The third review seems to be quite pleased with the product. Overall, it sounds like a nice player, but it suffers from poor implementation (or at least Q/A in manufacturing). It would be nice, however, if they were able to get these issues resolved. However, if problems such as these are as prevalent as they appear to be, my money if perfectly content with rotting in the bank until something slightly more functional appears on the market. I can only hope the promised firmware updates will help to alleviate the glitches.
Rule No. 153: You cut the fat, you cut the flavor.
1337 (Score:1)
Oritron NPD1337
MediaMVP wants to hear from you.. (Score:3, Informative)
After asking hauppage about linux support I got this response:
- - - - - -
Dear mynamehere
Thanks for your note.
The MediaMVP currently requires a WindowsXP or Windows2000 system. Even though our MediaMVP product development was done under Linux, the "server" part of the system is currently only running with Windows.
There have been a ton of requests for Linux servers, and our engineers are seeing what we can do to support a Linux server. When we do, we will post a free update on our website.
Ken Plotkin
Hauppauge
- - - - - - - - - -
Personally I would buy a couple of them in a sec if it supported linux (where all my media is located)... The point here is that if we let'em know that there is a demand for linux drivers/software they *will* make them.. (hopefully before xmas) So, if you have interest on this kind of a device for linux, send them a nice email at sales@hauppauge.com
Re:MediaMVP wants to hear from you.. (Score:1, Informative)
1) it seems to be a bit picky about which types of mpeg streams it will play. I have had no trouble playing mpeg1 files that I created for the purpose of making svcds. However, I have not had any luck in getting it to play any mpeg2 files. I believe, however, that this is because of my newbie skill level in creating such files.
2) It would be nice to be able to start playi
What I would like. (Score:2)
Re:What I would like. (Score:1)
Discussed earlier here:
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/07/1
I'm seriously considering buying one of these even at the hefty $900 price.
I'd like to see some more up to date feedback on this
XBMP (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:XBMP (Score:1)
Re:XBMP (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
Re:WHat interrests me is... (Score:1)
I wasn't able to test HDTV resolutions due to my setup. The player has component video output and the manual states that it supports HDTV resolutions, but that may only be DVD -- not streaming. I just don't know.
3 Mb/s limit - and prices (Score:1, Informative)
No PVR? No thanks. (Score:2)
VIA EPIA Nehemiah 10000M (Score:2)
The board+cpu is sold together and can be installed into a case yourself, or you can get barebones systems inside little cases cheap
NPD3117 ? (Score:3, Funny)
Best media player on the market. (Score:2, Informative)
- Dolby 5.1 and High definition and progressive video support through component connection options
- DVD, VCD, SVCD, MPEG1&2, DivX, XViD, Ogg, MP3, RM, Quicktime, WMV, TiVo, Shoutcast, JPG and many other formats
- Remote control available
- Built in 100BaseT, with optional 802.11x
- SOFTWARE UPGRADEABLE, with multiple applications already availabl
Re:Best media player on the market. (Score:1)
I like the XBox and PS2-based media players, but then you have a console with joypads plugged into as your entertainment hub. Just my preference, but I'd rather have an device that fits into the setup. Having the network connectivity in an actual DVD player means no funny looking devices by the TV (I don't own a console already).
Re:Best media player on the market. (Score:1)
While I prefer the controller, the remote will work and if everything else in your setup is dark colored, it will fit in fairly well.
Why is doing this with a PC so expensive? (Score:3, Interesting)
My complaint is The PC based inputs are so expensive. My current receiver cost me $300 a couple of years ago. It has 3 video inputs and 5 audio inputs. All of them are RCA jacks if I remember correctly. It has a radio tuner, and the amplifiers and 5.1 surround decoding. Basically your typical lower-midrange receiver.
I can't find a single PC card with more then 3 audio inputs for less then $1200. I don't remember ever seeing a video card with more then one input.
Why aren't these pieces available? Radio cards can be had for $70 fairly easily but the other, more important parts I can't locate. I figured I'd go with external amplifiers to simplify things and that will work out just fine.
I figured for $1000 I should be able to build a PC based receiver that doesn't require fancy menu's or anything tivo like, just a simple LCD interface and a remote. It appears that I'm wrong.
Can you change its region codes ? (Score:1)
Re:Can you change its region codes ? (Score:1)
I searched for region-free and Macrovision codes and wasn't able to find any yet. Forums seemed to have plenty of Oritron codes though (none worked on this model), so maybe new codes will surface soon.
As for your comment on the noisy computer, that was my point! I had that setup for awhile. It was loud and ugly. I could have hidden the unit, but the interface was too clunky. There are ways to improve the setup but I just wanted something drop-in-place.
Simlair products from Kiss Technology (Score:2, Interesting)
It's excellent box but only with bad user interface design. But you can upgrade it when ever Kiss publishes new software versions.
Re:Simlair products from Kiss Technology (Score:1)
These players definitely look like the most interesting at the moment; anyone would like to share their experience with this one?
Gateway's Version (Score:5, Informative)
Pros: Audio and video playing works exactly as advertised (even low-bit MP3s sound great), transcoded video works nicely, wireless works with WEP (although you have to enter the key in 24-bit hex through the remote).
Cons: Library support highly lacking (can't shuffle playlists, only plays alphabetically through an album), plays some DivX files as audio-only (haven't figured that one yet), aforementioned lack of OGG/AAC/QT support.
And why buy it? Can I build a PC with quality audio for $199? Nope.
My quick review... (Score:4, Informative)
1) For MP3's or JPEGS it works great.
2) For MPEG2, the video quality is good as it just streams it straight from the PC to the DVD player.
3) For any video that is not MPEG2 it sucks. On a 3 MBit/s MPEG4 file my Athlon XP 1900+ was not able to always keep up with the transcoding. The final video quality was shit compared to watching the same file on the PC.
4) You can only stream stereo sound. Even when I used
5) Navigating during a movie sucks. THere is no way to skip ahead to a specific point in the movie.
6) The PC software installed easily and did not install crap all over my computer. However, the interface for adding media to your library is kinda crappy.
my gateway player (Score:4, Informative)
Same as Gateway Connected DVD (Score:4, Informative)
Pros:
-Fast user interface to navigate (compared to say, the LinkSys network box which is slow as dirt)
-Includes progressive scan DVD player (no DVI-out though)
-Supports all kinds of video formats (with the latest firmware update)
Cons:
-The streaming app is poor in many respects - for example, you can't easily run two instances on the same machine to seperate content into two servers (e.g. one for me, one for my wife). It would be nice of the architecture was more open
-It organizes files by ID3 tags (album, artist), not by folder structure on your hard drive. That means if your files aren't tagged well, the UI is useless, and if you have a lot of partial albums, it's a pain to navigate. Expect to retag your library if it isn't already done well.
-No support for building a play-list on the DVD player - you can only play a single album/artist, a single song, or an existing playlist - no way to build up a queue of songs/albums on the fly.
-No way to change the sorting within an album - it sorts by song title, not track number, and plays in sort order. In the latest software you can work-around this by having it display filenames (which usually include track numbers, thus sort correctly), but then the names are so long you typically can't see the actual song title.
One final feature I wish it had - live streaming of the audio output on the PC to the DVD player, so that (for example), I could fire up Rhapsody and listen to it in my living room.
Altogether a pretty cool product - hopefully they'll address some of these issues in future firmware/software updates. If not, I may end up reverse engineering the networking to see how difficult it would be to create an alternate player.
fyi - They are using ffmpeg for all the transcoding that is mentioned, so it probably wouldn't be too difficult to replicate that aspect.
Windows Only? Say so first. (Score:1)
umm (Score:1)
Just get an xbox with a mod chip, throw in a bigish harddrive and XBMP and you are about to have the best dvd / divx / ogg / wmv / etc. player you've ever used. Get the component / hdtv kit and fill your pants.
Or you can be a lame "legal and free until I die!" and wait for some half crap linux solution to come out. O
What about Gateway? (Score:1)
mini ITX.... (Score:2)
Some other options (Score:4, Informative)
I'm using the Prismiq and the XBMP. Both have advantages, both have issues. Anyone have any other recommendations?
Re:Some other options (Score:1)
(In my pa
Re:Some other options (Score:2)
Re:Some other options (Score:1)
Re:Some other options (Score:1)
Read the FAQ big gotcha for mpeg-2 (Score:2)
http://www.onmediadvd.com/onmediadvd/FAQwhite.h t m# Technical%20Questions
What media formats are supported?
The following formats are supported:
AVI
BMP
ICO
JPEG (must be larger than 108 by 171 pixels)
M3U
MP3 (bit rate must be greater than 80 kbps)
MPEG (must not be greater than 3 MB/sec)
PCT
PLS
PSD
TIFF
WMA (bit rate must be greater than 48 kbps)
I wanted to be able to recoed and stream video from my desktop PC to the TV, but it's can
THANK YOU (Score:2)
Free advertising on slashdot ? (Score:2, Insightful)
Who's got shares in Oritron ?
A real reporter would have at least cited the name of similar products like some comments did.
A PS2 Can Do the Same Thing (Score:1)
Difficult-to-use isn't compulsory (Score:2, Interesting)
PC-based systems don't *have* to have clunky, complicated user interfaces. I've been fiddling around with this stuff for about a year now, and what I have at the moment (apart from the noise) is about as good as one can reasonably get.
I'm using Freevo [sf.net] to provide the user interface, along with a simple IR receiver and remote for input. I went with this rather than MythTV [mythtv.org] because the latter involves the extra administrative overhead of a database -- with Freevo, I can simply drop files into a directory an
would be nice if it was reliable (Score:1)
Hopefully Buy.com will replace it with a working model. It was pretty cool while it worked.
Re:Article (Score:2)