Cyber-Soap Returns From The Dead 156
An anonymous reader submits "Back in 1995, an experimental "cyber-soap" had a wildly successful launch. With over a million page hits a day (an almost unheard-of amount of traffic at the time), The Spot was named "Cool Site of the Year" in 1995, and by all appearances was a huge success.
As was the case for many projects of the time, though, by 1997 The Spot was gone, another victim of the dot-com bust. However, unlike other dot-com projects, The Spot has been given new life, un der new ownership, and was relaunched in March. Can the Spot, a unique blend of soap opera, blog, and reality show, survive this time around, or is it doomed to end up back in the graveyard of failed websites in which it was first buried seven years ago?"
Hit or miss.. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Hit or miss.. (Score:3, Interesting)
Promotion is everything in media these days. The So, the real question: Will The Spot have enough of an ad budget to get some TV ads to announce the project?
Re:Hit or miss.. (Score:5, Funny)
1. Get a frontpage story on Slashdot. *check*
2.
Re:Hit or miss.. (Score:1)
Damn it! (Score:2)
Re:Hit or miss.. (Score:2)
Re:Hit or miss.. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Hit or miss.. (Score:1)
Except now, the reality show has infected our beloved internet. Well, looks like the Intarweb has now also gone down the shitter along with TV and radio. It was nice while it lasted, guys... Perhaps now I'll have to... go... outside? (The Horror!)
Re:Hit or miss.. (Score:2)
It appears that this stupid site is based on journals that people write daily or something like that. We get involved by reading them. Heres today's
OMG! I was actually recognized by a Spot fan at work yesterday! It was so surreal and uber aw
Re:Hit or miss.. (Score:1)
Died for a reason (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Died for a reason (Score:3, Funny)
A good old-fashioned /.-ing.
Accurate? (Score:5, Insightful)
The dot-com bust in 1997? Huh?
Love them hype-journalism phrases. "Dot-com bubble" and "dot-com bust" are used to explain every negative event in technology.
Re:Accurate? (Score:4, Interesting)
In fact, I don't quite see where they're going to get funding from this go around either...
Re:Accurate? (Score:2)
With the ever-growing number of media wannabe's itching for attention out there and in search of a "platform".. they might pay/hustle to get on a 'show' like this.
Re:Accurate? (Score:1)
i just want funding to support an operation to keep the sight offline. i find it offensive.
FIFO (Score:3, Funny)
The Spot was one of the first in and first out of the Dot-com era...
Must've been exactly that, since I've never heard of it before.
Then again, I was only a baby then.
Re:Accurate? (Score:1, Redundant)
Re:Accurate? (Score:2, Informative)
This is how far I got (Score:5, Funny)
Yep. *Closes browser*
Re:This is how far I got (Score:1)
Re:This is how far I got (Score:1)
Re:This is how far *I* got (Score:2)
Re:This is how far *I* got (Score:1)
Is this Slashdot product placement?
Simply ahead of its time... (Score:3, Insightful)
So, take beautiful actors and inject scripted situations... and away they go. I'm sure this'll spin into something this go around. 1995 was just a little too early.
Re:Simply ahead of its time... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Simply ahead of its time... (Score:2)
It was scripted by 1 person, no actors, no people! (Score:2)
I remember reading The Spot when it first came out. We were all fascinated by it, even though we could tell it was a little bit unreal.
The reason it failed was that it was a complete set-up. None of the characters existed, not even in the sense of an actor/author playing the part. One person wrote all the various blogs; he and a couple other people plotted out the storylines in advance.
Once that broke, interest in the site dropped like a rock.
Re:Wrong! You couldn't be more wrong. (Score:2)
Because it was posted on the site.
Which leads to some interesting "all Cretans are liars"-class of questions. I choose to believe that the site is a complete piece of shit and to get my entertainment elsewhere.
Re:Wrong! You couldn't be more wrong. (Score:2)
You have not offered proof either, only unsubstantiated claims. I haven't looked at the site since 1997, so I neither know nor care what's happened to it since. Maybe the Wayback Machine has copies of the original, but I have better things to do.
Give up, dude; I still don't believe a word you've said, despite the supercilious tone. And I don't feel the need to make you believe me, so if you don't, you don't. Plonk you go into the killfile.
Message to 1995 (Score:5, Funny)
We do not want this. Please take it back. We have enough reality TV shows as it is, who in the HELL would want them on the internet???
Signed,
Conserned Slashdotter.
PS, please tell Al Gore "Thanks for your brilliant contributions".
Re:Message to 1995 (Score:1)
Re:Message to 1995 (Score:4, Funny)
Did you see Demolition Man? Remember the funny joke about the President Schwarzenegger and the 61st Amendment.
Um, well...
Re:Message to 1995 (Score:2)
Re:Message to 1995 (Score:2)
Re:Message to 1995 (Score:2)
Oh God It's Starting (Score:2)
Excuse me while I get my Marimba Castinet push technology and I'll pay for it with my Flooz.
Re:Oh God It's Starting (Score:1)
revisionist history (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:revisionist history (Score:2)
I dont think it'll do that well.. (Score:2, Insightful)
the truth (Score:1, Insightful)
? PARSE ERROR (Score:2)
Re:? PARSE ERROR (Score:2)
At least I got one part right.
The soap opera of my choice (Score:1)
1. relationships are formed
2. couples break up
3. people start to hate eachother
4. people start to love eachother
5. someone dies
6. someone are born
contents of the soap-opera i want to see:
1. Operating systems are installed
2. Operating systems are removed
3. Some company sues another company
4. Some company donates money to another company
5. Software is abandoned
6. New software projects are started.
Why cant anyone make something like this?
Re:The soap opera of my choice (Score:2)
Re:The soap opera of my choice (Score:1)
Re:The soap opera of my choice (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:The soap opera of my choice (Score:2, Funny)
Re:The soap opera of my choice (Score:1)
Will it survive? (Score:2, Funny)
Sorry it's a short post, I have to get back to Everquest.
Re:Will it survive? (Score:2)
I suppose the same could be said about anybody posting on Slashdot...
Re:Will it survive? (Score:1)
It'll die again (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:It'll die again (Score:2)
Re:It'll die again (Score:2)
That's true. They don't. So puhleaze stop doing it yourself.
When I want an on-line soap opera (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:When I want an on-line soap opera (Score:4, Funny)
Insightful?????
Funny, possibly, but insightful???
Re:When I want an on-line soap opera (Score:2)
Re:When I want an on-line soap opera (Score:1)
dot-com bust in 1997? (Score:2, Informative)
I thought the bust was more like 2000-2002. I was laid off in from my comfy biotech position in mid 2001, when the only aspect of the company that had any remote potential was eaten by a bigger fish. Something like 85% of the employees laid off.
Does this anonymous poster have a short-term memory?
Videos on the site (Score:1)
As for the actual content...
Well it's nothing unusual compared to what I have seen in my own blogging experience [xanga.com]. I don't know why I'd bother with this site, there are other sites with more people and more interesting people [xanga.com] out there.
Re:Videos on the site (Score:2)
<EMBED SRC="reed050304x.mov" WIDTH="231" HEIGHT="162" ALIGN="BOTTOM" autostart="false" kioskmode="true">
Personally, I checked the site out and watched 30 second of one video and I've had enough. All the people on it are obvious wanna-be actors... It's like any other reality TV show... I can't stand all the actors already.
Truthfully though, I can see it do well, but only if they put TONS of money in marketing.
-B
Quick, you guys! (Score:3, Funny)
All together now...
*click* *click* *click* *click* *click*
And let's not forget (Score:2)
Re:And let's not forget (Score:1)
It'll Probably Succeed (Score:3, Insightful)
People already lap up blogs and celebrity websites, and watch webcams with frightening regularity, and soap fans already have a large stream of spolier mags and dedicated websites. Now that the dotcom boom has passed, it's more likely that someone will actually generate a decent way to generate money from the system rather than think "it's on the intarweb! It must be profitable".
The only real issue I see with this is there is real competition with actual weblogs and "legitimate" celebrity webpages, where the content is free and more "true to life".
Re:It'll Probably Succeed (Score:1)
I'm pretty sure that CBS' "Big Brother" TV show gets enough viewers to have it running 4 years in a row (BB5 is coming soon). I also believe that its online subscription service, where you can watch the Big Brother contestants 24/7 uncut/uncensored also gets enough subscribers to be profitable.
MTV's "The Real World" has been running 13 years and sees no signs of stopping. Shows like the "New
Cyber-soap? (Score:1)
Product placement goes "reality show"... (Score:5, Interesting)
I spent all of 5 minutes browsing the spot, and it was blatantly obvoius that most "post" we're little more than product placements. "Amanda" "hears" about how [swedish retailer of semi-disposable furniture]'s got some great(!) stuff - going there now!! The "Kai" character takes up surfing - i.e. goes to a named and praised surf shop (link+logo included of course), the guys at shop X we're awesome!!
So, this is apparantly business' take du jour, on the latest mainstream trends online - we get the likes of the spot and the subservient-chicken. Viral marketing ey? Well, let's start spraying some virus-killing poison then.
I'm so reminded of the ad agency in Gibson's Pattern Recognition [williamgibsonbooks.com] it's not even funny.
Wherever and whenever real people try (and do) find each other in - to them - meaningful ways, you can be goddammed sure that advertising leeches will find a way to nestle their way in between them. Gotta get yer earnin' on.
Re:Product placement goes "reality show"... (Score:2)
(ot) Gibson interview, links? (Score:2)
Along those lines, whatcha think of No Maps For These Territories [nomaps.com] - pretty good docu/interview with Mr. Gibson, huh? Fascinating author, great zeitgeist, even greater/unique style of writing.
And way OT: as you obviously know more about Gibson than me, any ideas on what he's writing now?
Cross-media comedy set at Go_Ogle will work (Score:1)
Excerpt:
[The Opportunity Services Group]'s internships for 1.0ers will be set at our online social networking service, code-named Go_Ogle.
The earliest internships will focus on Go_Ogle's leading-edge technology for searching social networks, which is also a 'must-use' in corporate turnarounds.
We will market our interns, suppliers, intern employers, Go_Ogle and OSG through profitable comedy programming, online and on television. The initial television program -- The Secret Lif
Valua America! (Score:1)
great... (Score:1)
but, to remain on topic, it doesnt even seem much of a question of whether or not the show will succeed, its more of the same question every other "Reality Show" faces:
who REALLY gives a shit?
Why the Spot was Interesting... (Score:3, Insightful)
I remember a friend mocking me at the time for thinking anyone would post such stuff for real. But now, with a million blogs/webcams where people post insanely personal information/images for no financial gain, I feel somewhat vindicated...
Re:Why the Spot was Interesting... (Score:3, Interesting)
At the beginning, it was well-done enough that it really was not a slam-dunk either way. It was only in the last 6-9 months or so when it started REALLY coming out that it was an advertising experiment that people lost interest.
For those who weren't active at the time, the best analogy would be the Blair Witch Project, back when it was still a bit "underground". It was j
Re:Why the Spot was Interesting... (Score:1)
date correction (Score:3, Interesting)
I think that's why they said
http://web.archive.org/web/*/www.thespot.com
This isn't 1995 (Score:3, Insightful)
It won't work this time round. I'll watch The O.C.
News that matters ? (Score:1)
It's not even Sunday yet.
God, I can't wait to see what's left over for tommorow.
Sexual choose your own adventure (Score:1)
Heh (Score:1)
Oops.
All My Circuits (Score:1)
"That's what I wanted you to think with your soft, human brain."
ewwwwwhh!! (Score:1)
Yo, Matt - man, thank you so much for the help. Reed and I are gonna seriously take you up on lessons, dude. And PS: we wanna hear some of your tunes!
Lates,
Ka
Without Tara, it's nothing. (Score:1)
Re:Without Tara, it's nothing. (Score:1)
Fond memories (Score:1)
"or is it doomed to end up back in the graveyard" (Score:2)
Anyone remember sfblend? (Score:1)
Died a deserved death (Score:2)
I was a huge fan of the Spot back in '95 and '96. Got really tired of it by the time it was killed off. Loved the dog, but not the too sexy for the dot com bubble silly Cyberian adjective.
If memory serves, when it was thankfully put to sleep, it was because the production company was bought out by AOL which consolidated staff. AOL was heading in an entirely different direction.
The Spot is probably why I can't abide shows like Survivor, The Bachelor, etc. I burned out hard on this stuff.
I checked out the
Re:Died a deserved death (Score:1)
nope... (Score:1)
Wow Carrie is hot... (Score:2)
=^)
1997?? (Score:1)
The 'dot.com' bust occured several years after 1997. It sounds like the site was devoured in the dot.com boom, instead. Was it taken over by a conglomerate, similar to the way a number of good independent sites and companies were 'taken over', i.e. the handover.net thing?
Remembering "The Spot" (Score:3, Insightful)
If I recall correctly though, one of the things that detracted from it was when it became pretty much public knowledge that the whole thing was fictional. Part of the early fascination of "The Spot" was the belief that you were actually reading about the daily lives and adventures of real individuals (hence, the "reality TV" type concept, long before it existed on TV!).
I seem to remember the advertising agency running it really wanting to remain hidden as long as possible, to keep readers believing they really were reading a site hosted by the 20-somethings writing their life stories online. When the truth came out (partly due to magazines like Wired spilling the beans), it just failed to interest me any more.
TheSpot's first failure is part of a book (Score:2)
Basically it's divided into chapters based on sterotype - Garbagemen (support techs, low-level coders etc), Cops & Streetwalks, Social Workers (think AOL chatroom moderaters, online chat h
Relive the past - wayback (Score:2)
Re:Bad idea (Score:2)
Last I checked, the number of female gamers was skyrocketing. It doesn't matter that the medium was (or even still is predominately) male. Bored housewives are surfing - check your spam. Those breast enhancement boobs (haha - it's a pun!) know something about their market.
Just because it's a predominately male medium doesn't mean that there isn't money to be made by innovating and deploying in that medium. In fact, the person who does it right and does it first will probably make the bigg
Re:Bad idea (Score:2)
The internet is being marketed to women almost exclusively now. Presumably because all the men already have it