Tour De France Showcases Multitude Of Tech 427
whoda writes "When you think of a bicycle, you most likely think of 2 tires, a chain, some gearing of some sort, and other assorted mechanical bits. However, when Lance Armstrong, Jan Ullrich, and over 180 other riders get together to compete at the Tour de France every year, there is a lot of technology that comes along for the ride too. From Lance's Sunglass'/MP3 Player to the advanced use of composites seen on Tyler Hamilton's
time trial bike, there are many examples of
high technology making the racers faster through better training, materials and
aerodynamics."
Hmmm (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Hmmm (Score:5, Funny)
I hope Jan Ullrich's cousin Lars doesn't find out about this. He'll be PISSED.
The ultimate in technology and bikes... (Score:5, Interesting)
http://www.recumbents.com/whpsc2004.htm
Too bad there's not enough interest to really get some money into the development of these things.
Check out my website...
Re:The ultimate in technology and bikes... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:The ultimate in technology and bikes... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:The ultimate in technology and bikes... (Score:4, Funny)
Bio tech too! (Score:4, Insightful)
rampant doping (Score:4, Interesting)
One does wonder what other sorts of biochemistry are going on with riders(I've always thought it was kind of ironic that Lance was sponsored by a major pharmaceutical, and yes, I am deeply suspicious that Lance's chemo and related drugs somehow altered his body to make him much stronger; I don't think he would be stupid enough to be doping himself), seeing as how doping is rampant in virtually all other sports- and the message to little kids has been nothing of zero tolerance but instead "I'm a good guy, I couldn't have been doing drugs, even though my trainer was caught twice before doping his runners and I failed a drug test" etc etc.
Then there's the baseball players, who were TOLD AHEAD OF TIME they'd be tested. When they were tested- ONE QUARTER of them failed! Unbelievable! That's like telling everyone the answer to a one question quiz, and then having 25% fail!
I forget which bike race it was, but police did a raid on the rider's barracks one night, and it was like a scene from animal house- they had riders leaping out of windows in their underwear, hiding in the bushes, running off, etc. They found dozens upon dozens of drug vials, needles, pills, you name it. It was absolutely pathetic.
Re:Bio tech too! -- and good drugs!!! (Score:5, Informative)
Considering that the main drug of choice for cyclists (EPO) still has no reliable test that can't be beat by a quick I.V. to water down the blood supply.
Nope, they do have a test for EPO now; granted you can still get beneficial effects and test clean, but a "quick IV" won't beat it. They also test hematocrit levels - if they're too high, you're suspended (this is actually not a positive test, since no drugs are detected, but you can't race for "health reasons"). This goes to the heart of how EPO helps performance.
Instead he went from being a sprinter who was a middle of the road time trialist and basically poor climber into a virtuoso. I don't buy it for a minute.
Is this why he was Junior National Time Trial champion? Is this why he road away from the field at World's (1993, and also as a junior (he didn't win as a junior, but he put the hurt on people)). Lance was never a sprinter - he was much more of a rolleur until he was able to reshape his body after chemotherapy (by losing the upper body mass from his triathalon days). THEN he became a good climber.
Check out the book LA Confidential:
Which is the subject of multiple lawsuits by Lance against the author. Also, Walsh (the author) even admits he doesn't prove anything. He merely "implies" that Lance used drugs; I'm guessing Walsh's defence in court will be along these lines.
People like you make me angry. Lance has been the most tested athlete over the last few years and has NEVER tested positive. The French judiciary had a mutli YEAR investigation into his alleged drug taking - the case was thrown out when they couldn't uncover ANY evidence that he had used performance enhancing substances. That investigation even subpeonaed his medical records, btw, so they had full access to all available information.
Go away.
jon
Or maybe he just has (metaphorical) balls... (Score:5, Informative)
"As a close follower of cycling, I have always doubted his cancer story and just assumed he made it up to cover his tracks and maybe make some publicity for one of his suppliers."
I now crown you Supreme Grand Poobah of the Tinfoil Hat Society. And that says a lot given what we read on Slashdot.
Dude, you're assuming the guy FAKED cancer? Because he recovered better/faster than you did? And you don't like it?
"I had similar surgery to Lance (had my left testicle removed)and there was no way I was getting back on a bike for over 9 months."
Well thank you for setting the limit of the human experience for us. Really, it's comforting to know you're the pinnacle of human endurance, pain tolerance and tissue healing.
I had similar surgery (hours of slicing and dicing, lots of fun recovering, I assure you) and was back on my bike in 7 WEEKS. And none of my riding friends were pointing at me and saying I must have faked it. I ride a lot, not huge amounts, but 100-125 miles/week typically. My body was used to it. And that's a mere pittance compared to any Tour rider's training schedule.
By your reasoning I must have faked my surgery. Or maybe there are people in this world who just deal with it. Hamilton rode most of the 2003 Tour with freakin' broken collarbone. He must've been faking it too.
"Instead he went from being a sprinter who was a middle of the road time trialist and basically poor climber into a virtuoso. I don't buy it for a minute."
I see. Or maybe it was because he:
Was already a damn good racer before.
Dropped a few dozen pounds during cancer treatment and kept it off (this greatly affects climbing efficiency - 10 lbs of extra mass is a LOT of weight to drag over several mountain passes each day)
Modified his training to use higher cadences (== less time above lactic threshold) to greatly improve his climbing efficiency.
The pain of cancer treatment recalibrated his sense of pain, suffering and misery.
Started actually scouting and RIDING key upcoming Tour stages during training.
Damn sad day when those who've never come close to attaining feel compelled to snipe at those who do.
Tyler Hamilton's Homepage (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Tyler Hamilton's Homepage (Score:3, Insightful)
I would say essentially three guys will be in the running going into the final TT. And, I dont think Tyler is there, it will be Lance, Heras and Ullrich.
Re:Tyler Hamilton's Homepage (Score:4, Insightful)
-Brain Surgery
-Testicular Surgery
-Lungs full of tumors
-Grosjean catheter
-One round of BEP chemotherapy
-Three rounds of VIP chemotherapy
And after all that, he wins 5 TDFs in a row. I think that qualifies as tenacity.
Spoilers (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Spoilers (Score:2)
Re:Spoilers (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Spoilers (Score:2)
Flat land it's easy to hit 30mph on a road bike. Before I broke some bones I used to keep a steady 20mph pace on flat dirt bike trails on my mountain bike.
Re:Spoilers (Score:2)
Wind tunnels & race numbers (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Wind tunnels & race numbers (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Wind tunnels & race numbers (Score:4, Informative)
I'd have to assume, "if they could of, they would of." The Tour rules probably state the race number must be fixed to your back. Here's an excerpt from the Tour website:
Re:Wind tunnels & race numbers (Score:5, Interesting)
Haven't been able to decide how I feel about this yet...actually I wish it was one way or the other:
a) riders can use _any_ man powered 2 wheeled vehicle of whatever design they want...
OR
b) ALL riders ride the exact same bike.
Either technology is a factor, or it isn't. I think it's the middle ground stance that annoys me.
Re:Wind tunnels & race numbers (Score:2)
Numbers (Score:2)
I used to race (badly). The fact that numbers are a source of drag is pretty much common knowledge. I can't remember how the pros attach their numbers in big races, but for most USCF events, they are pinned on, and are pretty much sails on windy days.
Re:Numbers (Score:2)
They tend to be self-adhesive. You can see this when someone retires and they have their numbers removed from their jersey.
Re:Numbers (Score:2, Informative)
Hah. (Score:3, Funny)
It gets a little overboard too (Score:5, Insightful)
While I agree that the use of technology is important in cycling, there's only so much one can do without having to rely on natural talent and training. Spending $180 for a 13 cm piece of metal [performancebike.com] in order to save 50 grams, is a problem. I see it with the guys I ride with. They'll spend a shit load of cash on a Litespeed titanium bike or a Trek 5200 [trekbikes.com] but will still mow down a pizza after a ride and not think about the fact that they can get over those hills a little faster if they weren't carrying a anchor on their gut.
Re:It gets a little overboard too (Score:2)
Re:It gets a little overboard too (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:It gets a little overboard too (Score:2)
All that effort, and they just bounce around.
Hell, just getting a pair of cheap rims with slicks would give those guys better street performance. But for some people, it's not about *actual* performance, it's about flash. Like those kids in civics with tri-level spoilers and coffee-can exhaust pipes. I suppose I shouldn't complain-- those folks are the ones who keep a steady supply of cheap, used hi
Re:It gets a little overboard too (Score:2)
Re:It gets a little overboard too (Score:3, Funny)
It's all about perspective.
Re:It gets a little overboard too (Score:5, Funny)
Not unique to cycling (Score:2)
Re:Not unique to cycling (Score:2)
More correct would be that no sane person can justify spending $1000's for a improvements that are at best going to help by a few seconds over many miles, unless they're doing time trials and have someone else paying for them....
I suspect that, compared to having the bike adjusted and maintained well, any improvements tow
How to get a lighter bike... (Score:5, Insightful)
A: Lose 500g.
Re:How to get a lighter bike... (Score:2)
A: Lose 500g.
Additional eat fewer of the Powerbars:
FUEL: PowerBar, $1.79
To help replace the 110,000 calories (31 pounds!) Armstrong will burn during the race, he will nosh on some 105 PowerBars and 210 PowerGels. Yum.
Re:How to get a lighter bike... (Score:3, Informative)
Lets put it into real world terms:
I am a cross-country mountain biker, and this season alone my weight has fluctuated anywhere from 170-185 pounds. (185 at the beginning of the season for sure, 170 after my last 24hr relay race, but regularly bouncing between 170 and 180)
And lets say I want to buy a
Re:It gets a little overboard too (Score:3, Funny)
Re:It gets a little overboard too (Score:2)
By spending $180 on a 13cm piece of metal that saves 50 grams does things. First, if it really does save 50 grams and this part is 180 grams, then the "normal" weight is 230 grams, or 27% lighter. 27% is significant. Think of a road bike that goes from 30 pounds to almost 20.
Also, the pizza eating gearhead is promoting (keeping a job for) some other materials geek, whereas the guy that
Re:It gets a little overboard too (Score:2, Informative)
"there's only so much one can do without having to rely on natural talent and training"
However, as I am also maintaining the bike myself, I can appreciate the more expensive parts of more expensive bikes, as they are often easier to clean, adjust and all in all maintain, than cheaper parts.
And if you ever try and climb the hill/mou
Re:It gets a little overboard too (Score:5, Insightful)
I was doing a norba race and once I finished I chilled out on the trail to watch some of the other heats. I saw a guy on a very sweet, expensive and light-looking XC bike carry over a 6-inch log.
In the same race I finished just ahead of a guy I see often on the circuit. He rides on an old rigid bike, and he was hammering through the bony sections anyway. I've broken a rigid bike (stem failed) on the same trail. If had any suspension at all he probably would have toasted me.
The moral ends up being that gear helps, but honing your skills on crappy gear helps you appreciate the pricier stuff even more. When coming up, skill and fitness are paramount - everything else is secondary, and it makes a lot of sense to save your money early on to make sure you like the sport and to get a fitness and skill base going.
Re:It gets a little overboard too (Score:3, Interesting)
Conclusion?
Re:It gets a little overboard too (Score:2)
Re:It gets a little overboard too (Score:2)
That said, I just finished the "triple bypass" here. Its a 120 mile ride over three passes. There were many cool retro bikes being ridden but the most amazing rider was on a unicycle. I can't even imagine going 120 miles in the flats let along over Loveland pass..
Re:It gets a little overboard too (Score:2)
Can be done, but a stadard position cycle works better in this case.
Bents are great, a lot of people who can't ride a standard get to ride, so I love 'em.
Re:It gets a little overboard too (Score:5, Interesting)
I've got a 3 year old $400(CDN) Peugeot mountain bike I bought just for casual riding at the time. This year I've gotten quite a bit more serious and have taken part in a number of cross-country relay races. Up until about a month ago, I was constantly looking at the 'other guys' $4000+ machines and trying to plan how and when I would upgrade.
I finally realized how stupid that would be.
a) most of the guys I ride with have expensive bikes.
b) i never get smoked by them.
c) their stuff breaks as much as mine does, but their parts are _way_ more expensive.
d) haven't had _my_ bike stolen.
e) I do it for FUN.
f) I will NEVER be taking it to the top level and thus will NEVER be able to actually reap the minute benefits one can get from really expensive bikes.
And unlike cars, where it's easy to argue that a bmw or mercedes is worth the money over a ford as they are more fun to drive, comfortable...blah blah whatever, I have NO problems with my bike and the expensive bikes I've ridden certainly don't feel special, and DEFFINATELY don't feel like they're worth more than 10x the price.
Now maybe if I broke the bank on a new bike I wouldn't be the only one with money to buy the beer after a good ride
Actually, if you wan't to get into a good useless waste of money tech discussion with a hardcore mountain-biker, pull out the v-brake vs disc-brake topic. Oh, I used to fall fully on the 'can't wait to have the cash to buy a nice set of disc-brakes' crowd...but a good slap with common sense brought me around.
Me: Gonna buy me a set of those real soon! (Disc Brakes)
Bike Shop Owner: Really? Why?
Me: Um, they're better...
Bike Shop Owner: Really? Why?
Me: Um, because they work better right?
Bike Shop Owner: Let me ask you this then, what problems are, or have you, had with your v-brake system?
Me: Um...
Bike Shop Owner: And of those problems, which will be solved by a higher price tag, more weight, more parts and generally more complexity?
Me: Since you put it like that, I guess I'm unsold thank you!
And as an interesting aside, the shop owner's success in _not_ selling me something has resulted in some darned solid customer loyalty.
Re:It gets a little overboard too (Score:2)
Recently scoped out new bikes (Score:5, Interesting)
Of course, with a bike that old, they would have had to replace, well, just about everything in order to put in a new derailer. In fact it would be only slightly more to simply buy a new bycycle!
So I started looking at bikes. I could get a nice road bike for $800 (US) that was far superior to my existing bike. Then I started looking at the carbon composite bikes, like the Roubaix series. I really didn't think I'd feel the difference until I test-rode one.
Holy S*it! If the $800 bike was an order of magnitude better then my existing one, the Roubaix Comp (at $2600) was an order of magnitude better then the $800 bike. All carbon-composite construction, vibration dampening... the works. Unbelievably light, I could lift the whole bike with my pinky pretty much! Smooth ride, ultra smooth shifting, huge gearing range. The technology is really amazing.
-Matt
Re:Recently scoped out new bikes (Score:2)
Of course?? I'm no expert, but I've never had trouble finding derailers for bikes from the 80's. I thought they were pretty standard. I'd shop around a little more if I were you....
--Bruce Fields
Mp3 Sunglasses (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Mp3 Sunglasses (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Mp3 Sunglasses (Score:2)
Re:Mp3 Sunglasses (Score:5, Funny)
LANCE LANCE LANCE!
LANCE LANCE LANCE!
LANCE LANCE LAAAAAANCE!
The rest of this post is non-capitalized filler to get past the lameness filter. The reason I used caps is because you can't do the guitar riff from Eye of the Tiger without yelling. It's un-American.
Let's see.. so far... (Score:2)
F1 Racing Technologies [slashdot.org]
Tour de France Technologies, particularly Lance Armstrong
To be expected:
NASCAR Technologies
Soap-box Derby Technologies
Re:Let's see.. so far... (Score:2)
Re:Let's see.. so far... (Score:2)
Plasters? (Score:3, Funny)
Still hurts when 50 'nodes' of the pelaton decide to crash all at the same time, in a cascade, rather like nodes on a M$ network. I wonder what this stuff was designed on...
As an aside, these guys are the best athletes in any event the world over.
Re:Plasters? (Score:2)
Subject: TDF vs. GDR
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 17:38:49 -0400
TOUR FACT SHEET
2107 miles
23 days total: 1 prologue, 20 stages and 2 rest days
11 flat stages
6 mountain stages
3 individual time trials
1 team time trial
21 nine-rider teams
$3,687,619.22 total prize money
$491,648.51 to the winner (winning team)
Great Divide Race Fact She
Unmentionned Tech (Score:2)
www.fossilfool.com/down-low-glow.htm
'course, you can just take any two cold cathode kits, cut the molex pin and splice a 9V battery connector, a 8xAA battery holder from Radio Shack, and a seat-bag to get a similar look for your bicycle.
With one pack of 8 NiMH 1800mA AAs powering two CCs, I get over 4.5 hours of neon light.
Sunglass mp3 player. (Score:2)
Re:Sunglass mp3 player. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Sunglass mp3 player. (Score:2)
MP3 (Score:4, Interesting)
We have a little addendum to our Tech from the Tour de France feature from a couple of weeks ago: this special pair of Oakley sunglasses with a built-in MP3 player that Lance Armstrong was spotted wearing [weblogsinc.com]. No idea whether they're planning to ever sell these or not, but a little bit of research reveals that the sunglasses only have enough room on them for 35 songs, which makes us think that they probably have somewhere around 128MB of storage somwhere in there.
True, but that doesn't mean Lance plays only 35 songs for the entire Tour. Does anyone know if the Tour rules prohibit changing electronic media and so forth? He could play a new set of 35 songs every day. At least that would be interesting trivia, what songs did Armstrong listen to every day of the Tour..
Re:MP3 (Score:2, Insightful)
What I'd like to know more about is what kind of technology is in place to protect those radio conversations. You'd have to bet that Saiz, Godefroot and Riis would love to listen in on Bruyneel and Armstrong. (directors sportif for Heras, Ullrich, Hamilton and Armstrong)
Re:MP3 (Score:4, Informative)
Re:MP3 (Score:5, Funny)
That's all he needs.
Let's just make one thing perfectly clear... (Score:2)
Slashdot bias towards bicycles (Score:5, Funny)
I would like to request that Slashdot drop it's discrimination/bias against unicyclists and tricyclists of the world. The poster assumes that everybody will think of two-wheeled "bicycles" when they think about cycles. This is not the case. I would also like to request all Girls to stop being biased against unicycle and tricycle riders. We are every bit as good as the so called "bicycle" riders.
Please join the fight against even-wheeled cycle fanatics.
Thank you.
Re:Slashdot bias towards bicycles (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Slashdot bias towards bicycles (Score:2)
Speaking of big-O - are you a one-wheeler? If so, what are you riding these days? I've been messing around on a trials uni recently... trying to mount picnic tables without violating local decency laws.
Possible Playlist (Score:4, Funny)
10. "The Cougar Fight Song": Nothing is quite as stirring as hearing the band break into "Rise and Shout" at the beginning of a sporting event.
9. "Olé": No, this is not the Ricky Martin World Cup song. It's the chant soccer fans around the world have been singing far longer that consists of just that one word: "Olé, olé, olé, olé... olé, olé."
8. "SportsCenter Theme": Every true sports fanatic now recognizes the familiar intro to a full hour of the best of the day's sports action. Most of us watch it two or three times a day.
7. "Chariots of Fire" - Vangelis: This classic theme music has defined track songs for over twenty years. The Olympic team training on the beach idealizes the essences of pushing yourself to the limit.
6. "The Hey Song": Who can resist the compelling, "duh-dun duh-dun duh-dun duh-dun duh-dun-dun . . . HEY!" during a game? We all know it . . . and we all yell just as loud when it's played.
5. "Eye of the Tiger" - Survivor: The most compelling sports stories come from the underdogs, the little guys (see March Madness and every sports movie ever made). This song epitomizes fighting against the odds.
4. "Take Me Out to the Ball Game": Any list on sports songs must include this classic. It conjures up images of lazy afternoons at the ballpark, of the seventh inning stretch, and of preserving the tradition and history of sports.
3. "You All Ready For This?": Sports action must be on tap whenever you hear this familiar opening music. It gets the blood boiling and the vocal cords limber for the excitement to follow.
2. "We Are the Champions" - Queen: Athletic competition means winners and losers, and no song better embodies that than this one. In extolling the journey, it honors the effort it takes to get to the top.
1. "We Will Rock You" - Queen: Stomp, stomp, clap. Stomp, stomp, clap. Everyone steps up to the challenge when the greatest sports song of all time is played. It's played at every level in every sport, making it easily #1.
Honorable Mention: "Sweet Georgia Brown" (Harlem Globetrotters theme), "Charge!", "Hey, Baby", "Jump Around."
Wrong wrong wrong, (Score:2)
Cuz that is who is warming the bed after the race.
Re:Wrong wrong wrong, (Score:2)
http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/sherylcrow/crashan
But I guess we know who's strong enough to be her man.
http://www.lyricsdepot.com/sheryl_crow/strong-eno
Come on Armstrong! (Score:2, Interesting)
Trek 5200 (Score:3, Interesting)
But the bike is a joy to ride. I owned a crappy Schwinn most of my road bike riding days and so I splurged a bit and got some Sidi shoes and this bike. I enjoy riding it, esp. going up hills.
Maybe I overspent, but I enjoy the bike. The OLCV Carbon is damn light. And if I enjoy riding, I'll ride more. I had my fill of heavy steel bikes, this really is a whole different league. I've read a few responses that mock people for spending too much on the bike. Most of those people have a iPod and a $500 video card just to play counterstrike.
It's still about the riders (Score:5, Insightful)
Lance has a cool bike, but all the Tour de France riders have good bikes. There is a limit to how much benefit you can get with a better bike, and all the tour guys have bikes that are close to this limit.
The slowest of the Tour riders, on a bad day, could ride me into the ground on a 20-year-old piece-of-junk bike, even if I were on my good bike. Sure I could climb Alpe d'Huez, but it would take me at least a couple of hours, and the Tour guys race up it in 40 minutes or so, as just part of a 5 or 6 hour day of racing!
The most important tech to Lance is the tech he uses in training. He trains and trains. They measure his power output in Watts, how many Calories he burns, how much wind drag he has on his time trial bike. It's his training that will win the race, his training and good tactics (both his and his team director, Johan Bruyneel).
P.S. The Tour rules have a lower limit on how much a bike can weigh. I think this is a good idea. There is a point at which "light" becomes "stupid light"; where the too-light components aren't strong enough and things start to break. The minimum weight will keep the bikes from getting into a stupid-light arms race.
The Tour rules also now require helmets, and the helmets have to actually be able to protect the riders' heads. Last year riders wore lightweight helmets for the time trial stages, and the lightweight helmets were basically just streamlined shells that wouldn't protect them at all in a crash. This year even the time trial helmets are required to meet crash safety standards. I'm in favor of the idea.
steveha
Don't forget the coverage tech (Score:5, Interesting)
Add to that GPS transmitters on every bike, which brings instant results at the end of the race to the 100th of a second, and (this year on OLN) up-to-the-second time gaps among the groups on the road (this'll really shine when they hit the mountains).
All this, plus entertaining commentary, live worldwide.
Re:Too bad (Score:2, Funny)
I'm assuming that you probably have both... And I'll also assume that his one-nutted ass could also kick your ass.
Re:Has Lance started trying yet? (Score:2, Informative)
Its also a mother to put in correctly
Re:Has Lance started trying yet? (Score:2)
Re:Has Lance started trying yet? (Score:5, Informative)
They have made it so that the most you can lose is 3:00
It's true that this keeps a well-trained team like Team Postal from tearing up the General Classification, but that's all it's doing. Their goal was to keep so many teams from being out of it due to one team trial.
As Lance said, it's their race, their rules. They knew about the changes in advance, and the rules apply to everyone, so he just has to ride it.
Besides, it's the mountains that make the biggest difference in overall time, and is also where Lance excels at.
Re:Has Lance started trying yet? (Score:3, Informative)
steveha
Re:Has Lance started trying yet? (Score:2)
However, I'm sure there's plenty to make most of them cry :)
Re:Has Lance started trying yet? (Score:2)
Last year we watched Ullrich do nothing during the last few days. He 'knew' he couldn't make a difference, even though he really wasn't that far off. You know Lance would have made a breakaway attempt if he needed to... even on the last day.
Re:Has Lance started trying yet? (Score:4, Informative)
Last year, Jan wanted to make up time on the last time trial, but the sloppy weather did him in. He slid out on a turn and thus lost 8-10 seconds; there was no way he could make up enough time to win. (One of the OLN commentators said that Lance slowed to 5 MPH on the part where Jan slid out, and his rear wheel still skidded a bit. Dangerous! All Lance had to do was ride very carefully and not crash, to secure the win... he already had a time advantage.)
On flat road stages, there is no way for Lance to get a time advantage on Jan, or for Jan to get an advantage on Lance. If either of them gets in a breakaway, the peloton will reel them in immediately. They both know it. Jan didn't "do nothing" during the last few days; he did what he could, which wasn't enough to pull out the win.
steveha
Re:Has Lance started trying yet? (Score:5, Informative)
Lance and his guys have incredible focus on just one thing: Lance finishes the race with the fastest time. They have been doing an excellent job of tracking that goal.
They don't waste energy trying to win stages needlessly, but when riding hard will give them an advantage, they do it (e.g. stage 3, they rode hard and fast to stay ahead of the crashes expected on the cobblestones). When Lance got the yellow jersey after stage 4, they let everyone know he wouldn't work to defend it because he didn't need it that early, and they let it go.
Part of winning the Tour de France is simply enduring the abuse. If you burn yourself out on one stage, you may find yourself in trouble on the next stage. That's okay if all you care about is winning one stage, but Lance absolutely needs to avoid burning himself out. He needs to out-ride everyone, and part of that is not wasting energy. Use it when you need it, and when you don't need it, save it for later.
On flat road stages, it's basically impossible for any of the GC contenders (Lance, Jan, Tyler, etc.) to gain any significant time advantage. The peloton is faster than any single bicyclist. Since the race is structured this year with a whole bunch of flat road stages up front, we have been watching Lance and his guys spend their time riding mostly defensively. That's okay.
If you look at the race standings, Lance seems far from a win. But the guys ahead of him will lose big time in the mountains! And his real rivals, the guys he worries about (Jan, Tyler, etc.) are all behind him on time. Jan is almost a minute behind him.
Lance's big chances to gain a time advantage are time trial stages and mountain stages. When he hits those stages, expect him to really pour on the effort. But it's just not true that he's slacking now.
what the hell is the name of the thing that connects the crank arms?
The bottom bracket, which has a shell containing some bearings and a spindle. If that doesn't answer your question, try googling for "bottom bracket parts" or some such.
steveha
Re:Has Lance started trying yet? (Score:2)
Re:Has Lance started trying yet? (Score:2)
Bullshit.
Re:If they really wanted to go faster (Score:4, Insightful)
The point is, bike racing is a lot more complicated than going faster than anyone else alone in a straight line on the flats. Sprints, climbinb, break aways, team strategy all play a roll.
Re:If they really wanted to go faster (Score:2)
Re:If they really wanted to go faster (Score:4, Insightful)
-the entire bicycle must weigh at least 6.8 kg
-the frame must be of the 'double diamond' design (this rules out recumbents)
-no fairings
-all competitors are encouraged to use performance enhancing drugs (and their masking agents), as long as the team manager's girlfriend's doctor's cousin carries them.
Is there a rule? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Queue the... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Queue the... (Score:2)
Still, I'd be a lot more impressed with these sports if the rules required standard equipment. In the Olympics, you don't get to use your technical know how to create a lighter shot put so you can throw it further. Equipment standardization should be the first chapter of any rule book.
Standard Equipment (Score:3, Insightful)
I seriously doubt that standard equipment will make it into the UCI rules. Mainly, there are too many variables for proper bike fit. Something minor, like pedal style, can make a big positive or negative impact on a rider. Other things, like leg to torso to arm proportions, make geometry standardization totally unfair.
Re:Standard Equipment (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Not just tech... (Score:2)
As far as chemical enhancements go, that's of course rampant but it's par
Re:Er, one missing (Score:2)
futuristic tomato by fertilizing it with anabolic steroids.
Bart: The kind that help our Olympic athletes reach new peaks of
excellence?
Lisa: The very same.