Miyazaki Talks to the Guardian 234
BrainGeyser writes to tell us The Guardian is running an interesting summary of an interview with Hayao Miyazaki, proclaimed 'God' of anime. In the interview Miyazaki discusses a wide range of issues from his distribution deal with Disney to the future of anime. From the article: 'There is a rumor that when Harvey Weinstein was charged with handling the US release of Princess Mononoke, Miyazaki sent him a samurai sword in the post. Attached to the blade was a stark message: "No cuts."' While it was actually Miyazaki's producer, Miyazaki did 'go to New York to meet this man, this Harvey Weinstein, and [..] was bombarded with this aggressive attack, all these demands for cuts. He [Miyazaki] smiles. "I defeated him."'
The REAL question is... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:The REAL question is... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:The REAL question is... (Score:4, Funny)
So... he's like Shakespeare?
Re:The REAL question is... (Score:2)
Re:The REAL question is... (Score:4, Insightful)
Your claim that Spirited Away doesn't have a plot isn't even worth comenting on.
Your assumptions are as stupid as everything else you say. People who like Miyazai don't necessarily like everything Japanese. I, for one, hate most Anime. Even the most thoughtful stuff, like Cowboy Bebop, bores me to tears, to say nothing of the mindless crap that most Japanese cartoon studios turn out. But Miyazaki is a class unto himself. He tells complex stories, creates a sense of place that outdoes even most live-action movies, and has a wonderful artistic eye.
By contrast Tarentino knows how to frame a shot, and I guess he's good with actors. But his stories are childish and not terribly logical. I guess his fight scenes must be impressive, because even directors I respect say they're good. But some us what more to movies than fight scene.
Bottom line: QT knows his audience, and has a talent of sorts, but creatively he's not even on the same planet as Miyazaki.
Renting (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Renting (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Renting (Score:5, Informative)
There are four volumes, so it develops the world and story to a much greater depth than in the movie. It's Tolkienesque in scope, as much an exercise in world-building as storytelling. Miyazaki creates maps, kingdoms, technology, religions, and ecology for the world.
At the same time, his character development is excellent. As always his villains are the most interesting ones, and he's got a ton of them. They're also much more developed than in the movie. Princess Kushana switches sides halfway through, there's an immortal king suffering from ennui who is just fantastic, and then there's the God Warrior. The God Warrior is a mindless killing machine in the movie; but in the comics it is sentient... which makes it much more creepy, and Nausicaa's relationship with it is weirdly touching, but mostly disturbing.
There are some parts that come off as overly sentimental in the third volume- probably my least favorite- but it picks up again, strong, in the fourth. The fourth volume is as dark as Miyazaki gets. The ending... not happy, not unhappy. Complex. Again, that makes it one of his stronger works.
I'm not a huge fan of Japanese entertainment, but this is hands-down my favorite comic.
Re:Renting (Score:3, Insightful)
you know you can find these all [imdb.com] via IMDB.
Re:Renting (Score:2, Informative)
Spirited Away requires some understanding of bath houses and kami to fully enjoy. Totoro also happens in Japan, but the story is more universal.
Kiki is his most disneyesque work, good for introducing others.
Nausicaa, Laputa, I'm sure I'm forgetting some.
Re:Renting (Score:5, Insightful)
Yeah, I was kind of surprised that someone else described that as the most western-friendly. To me, it's the one film that requires the most understanding of Japanese culture in general (not just bath houses and kami) to enjoy. You can still enjoy it without that understanding, but you won't really fully "get" it.
All of Miyazaki's films have an underlying theme or moral. I have yet to find an American who really understood what Spirited Away was saying on the first viewing... and I must admit the only reason I probably did was that I watched it first in Japan surrounded by Japanese speakers. (So I both had it explained to me - I didn't understand all the dialogue - and I got to hear the impressions of a lot of other people in the theater afterwards.) Most people in the west seem to describe it as a run-of-the-mill "coming of age" fantasy, which it most certainly is not.
So I wouldn't start with that one. I think it's actually kind of an advanced Miyazaki film - there's a lot of subtext, a lot of cultural specificity, and while the underlying theme is relatively simple (it's a film about gluttony and greed), it seems like the way it's presented is not all that easy for westerners to grasp.
Same is actually true of Nausicaa, which has a lot of Cold War stuff mixed in and that kind of gets lost in translation, and maybe even forgotten now that the cold war is over...
I do agree that Mononoke is a good place to start. It's pretty simple, but it doesn't seem simple as you're watching it. It's beautifully animated, it's still relevant, and the plot itself is pretty imaginative, though easy to follow. It's also not really culturally-specific - I mean there are a few things (like the little guys running around the forest, I can't even remember what they're called), but nothing that gets in the way of following the story or understanding the theme. And you can imagine a similar sort of plot set in the west at that time.
Kiki and Porco Rosso are good too, although they're a bit lighter and may give newcomers a bit of a skewed idea of what Miyazaki's really all about. Laputa I just didn't think held up all that well the last time I saw it; the animation is not his best, and the story doesn't flow as well as some of his later films.
Totoro might be the one of his films (well, other than Howl's Moving Castle) that I haven't seen, so I can't comment on it.
Re:Renting (Score:2)
When I went to see SA, I'd successfully decoded the central allegories of Nausicaa and Mononoke. I especially liked the latter's mapping to survival-of-the-fittest darwinism versus the mercy and excesses of science and "progress".
So when I went to see SA I was constantly trying to lock-on to the allegory, and came up blank. The parents turning into pigs looked like a big clue, especially as it was mirrored by the all-consuming black demonic e
Re:Renting (Score:3, Insightful)
The big clue is the scene on the train. As Chihiro rides, we see neon signs advertising businesses
Re:Renting (Score:2)
I'm not sure if you're saying that it is not a "coming of age" fantasy, or if you're stating that it is more than just a "coming of age" fantasy. But i'll toss my pennies out there for you.
Spirited Away, blew me away. It certainly is a "coming of age" fantasy. I think you're reading into the gluttony and greed aspects have merit, but Spirited Away is most certainly about a little girl g
Why are /.ers like this? (Score:2)
What are those oh so insightful cultural references in a movie where my greatest recollecion of it is of a vomiting (or was it shitting) mega worm?
Re:Renting (Score:2)
I recommend:
Lupin III: Castle of Cagliostro (not usa-released yet?)
Nausicaä of the Valley of Wind (not usa-released yet?)
Laputa: The Castle in the Sky
My Neighbor Totoro
Kiki's Delivery Service
Grave of the Fireflies (hardcore war film)
Porco Rosso
Ocean Waves [TV movie] (aka, I Can Hear The Ocean) (not usa-released yet?)
Pom Poko (not usa-released yet?)
On Your Mark [music video] (not usa-released yet?)
Whisper of the Heart (not usa-released yet?)
Princes
Re:Renting (Score:4, Insightful)
One great about his movies is that there is almost never the stereotypical bad guy that is just evil for no reason. Everyone is doing what they think the right thing is. Much closer to real life.
They are mostly for children though. If you'd rather get something more adult, Princess Mononoke is probably the one to get.
Re:Renting (Score:3, Insightful)
But it's so hard to choose between them. All of the Miyazaki movies have IMO been very good to superb. I can't say the same for all Studio Ghibli work (T
Re:Renting (Score:3, Informative)
Kiki's excellent, too, but almost purely a coming of age movie. Early-teen stuff, no war, no epic, no magic... except for the magic of a beautiful, idealistic European town, the magic of nice people, the magic of life, the magic of music and excellent storytelling. Oh, and some broom flights, too.
Re:Renting (Score:2)
I saw that for the first time two days ago, and it is very good. It's less dramatic than the others and there are no bad guys, but it is very good for other reasons. It has a slowly developing storyline so could probably be watched in parts, and could be watched by all ages despite the fact that it does not portray a perfect world with perfect people. Most adults would probably enjoy it too.
I enjoyed Totoro the first time, but think the second time I saw it was a di
Re:Renting (Score:2)
Kiki's Delivery Service is just as good, though it has a different flavor than most of his other movies (as other posters mention below).
I do have to say, however, that I was disappointed by Howl's Moving Castle; perhaps it's just that I've come to expect a higher standard from Miyazaki, but it really didn't live up to what I was looking forward to. (Not that it was a bad movie--just not Miyazaki quality.) I've never read the book it was based on so I can't make comparisons, but my feeling is that he do
Re:Renting (Score:2, Insightful)
Actually, I'd rent them both...
Re:Renting (Score:2)
I also highly recommend Laputa: Castle in the Sky and Porco Rosso.
Actually, they're all damn good, but these three are my favourites.
Re:Renting (Score:2)
Hmmm... I just realized, all of Miyazaki's movies have that spirited, willful teenage girl in there somewhere. It even goes back to Castle of Cagliostro! (That was, for those playing along at home, a Lupin the 3rd movie.)
Which is not to imply any kind of Japanese-stereotypical pedophile association, mind you. If anything, his movies are pre-sexual, e.g., "For God's sake Alvy, even Freud
Re:My suggestions: (Score:2)
Re:So many defenders of Porco Rosso! (Score:2)
It's also, like a lot of HM films, about the problems of an age falling into the past, but in this case it is replete with references to Italian fascism (including the aesthetics and mores of Italian futurism, who called their writers "aeropoets.")
No cut (Score:4, Informative)
Weinstien. Cuts? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Weinstien. Cuts? (Score:3, Informative)
Cuts are made for many reasons. (Score:2)
Miyazaki for Disney CEO! (Score:3, Insightful)
No cuts? (Score:3, Interesting)
It just played on campus last Wednesday. The film quality was pretty bad and the sound was absolutely horrible (I blame the distributer). The drawing had to be the best I think I've ever seen in any anime or Disney flick.
There was one major plot hole that pretty much the whole audience fell through though. At a point late in the movie, after they've alluded to one character having had a curse put on him, the main girl kisses this character and with a *pop* he turns into a real person and exclaims: "I'm the prince from the kingdom next door!"
The audience roared with laughter at that. There was absolutely no mention in the beginning of the movie about this missing prince (that we could hear, maybe it was the shitty sound) and at the very end we realized that he was the whole reason for the war that was the major plot element of the story.
I really hope there was something cut from the Miyazaki version. Or at least that there was something said that we collectively managed to miss.
Re:No cuts? (Score:2)
To be fair, the last movie Disney Animation made before it closed forever was Brother Bear.
Re:No cuts? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:No cuts? (Score:2)
Re:No cuts? (Score:2)
Compared to other Miyazaki movies (which I consider to be near the top of the world's cultural heritage) I was thoroughly disappointed by the plot and pacing. I really hope Miyazaki will be able to match the genius he imparted on Mononoke and Spirited Away, because Howl falls far short of a grand finale.
Re:No cuts? (Score:2)
?
Re:No cuts? (Score:2)
Too subtle? I though "At one point in the movie..." was a pretty good hint too.
The state of the industry... (Score:4, Insightful)
I swear, if the industry was in charge of the mona lisa and marketing told them more people would buy prints if she was showing her pearly whites they'd paint right over the friggin thing!
Just import or pirate anime, at least that way you can avoid the marketroid version of whatever you're watching. Sadly, that is actually pretty much what is happening. And the companies wonder why they're hated and fansubs are loved.
Double Standard (Score:2)
That's a bit of a double standard, isn't it?
He certainly "screwed with" Howl's Moving Castle so that it was barely recognizable. Maybe he did it for idiological
Re:The state of the industry... (Score:2)
He didn't have to fly in at all. His contract with Disney famously denies them the right to make any cuts whatsoever. He was flying in to discuss the project anyway, so Weinstein asked him to make exceptions and give permission for cuts to be made. All he had to do was say no, and had he stayed in Japan during that time, all he would have to do was fax, email, or telephone a "no". Or jus
He RUINED Howl's Moving Castle! (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:He RUINED Howl's Moving Castle! (Score:4, Insightful)
The following quote comes from http://ansible.co.uk/Ansible/a210.html [ansible.co.uk] and refers to a personal screening of Howl's Moving Castle that Miyazaki hosted for Mrs. Jones near her home in Bristol:
`Miyazaki came in person, carrying with him a tape of the film, an interpreter and sundry other shadowy figures (all this was supposed to be secret for fear of the Japanese media, who then descended on me afterwards, so I couldn't mention it beforehand) and we had a private showing at the Watershed cinema. The film is goluptuously splendid with breathtaking animation. I had grown used to young ladies regularly writing to me to say that they wanted to marry Howl. Now, Howl in the film is so plain stunning and sexy that I think I have joined them. And after the showing and the scamper through Bristol I had a long talk with Mr Miyazaki and it began to seem that we were soulmates.'
I personally think that Sofie wasn't merely just any anime chick - she's a Miyazaki anime chick! Like Nausicaa, Fio (Kurenai no Buta/Porco Rosso), Shizuku (Whispers of the Heart/Mimi wo Sumaseba), and the other great Ghibli female leads, Sofie has more spunk, curiosity, complexity, and compassion than the vast majority of heroines of just about any genre.
As for the air raid scenes - this is a war we're talking about. Unfortunately, air raids on civilians are an inevitability of any modern war. But seeing it from the perspective of the victim in such explicit horrible detail really emphasis to the viewer that this war really really sucks.
I personally think that Miyazaki has a pretty good record of book/story adaptations:
- Gauche the Cellist (Miyazawa Kenji) had a wonderful soundtrack, the right "feel", and is a very faithful adaptation.
- Whispers of the Heart (Hiraagi Aoi) unfortunately removed a lot of poetic elements, and made some significant changes to the plot, but retains the overall "feel", while the character development of Shizuku is just wonderful. And the magic of the very last scene with the bicycle is beyond words.
- Ironically, Miyazaki's most disappointing adaptation, in my opinion, is Nausicaa. For me, the manga was an extradordinarily complex landmark work. The movie, although wonderful, just couldn't compare. The entire environmental theme (can man ever live in harmony with nature?) was only scratched at in the movie.
Re:He RUINED Howl's Moving Castle! (Score:2)
Diana Wynne Jones, the author herself, was reportedly very pleased with the movie.
What's she supposed to say? Very few authors have the luxury (like JK Rowling) of having script approval. And I agree with her that the animation was great and Howl was a hunk. I note that she appears to have said nothing about what happened to Sofie's character.
Sofie has more spunk, curiosity, complexity, and compassion than the vast majority of heroines of just about any genre.
In the book,
WHAT war? (Score:2)
Well, yes -- except that in the book there was no war! Miyazaki-san took a perfectly good story and, rather than tell it, forced it into his own obsession.
You can't justify the air raids as a necessary consequence of
Repeat after me. (Score:2)
And again.
Movies may be based on books, that does not mean they should be textually accurate.
And agian.
Movies
Cuts vs. Grafts (Score:2)
Trite. There is a difference between the kind of editing dictated by the length (LOTR, for instance) and format constraints [1] of a movie and what Miyazaki-san did. Cuts are necessary -- but he inserted a completely foreign theme, warped the plot around it, and cut most of the original story to make room.
That is not the kind of "adaptation" that is compatible with any kind of artistic integrity.
[1] Catch-22 relies s
Huge "improvement" (Score:2)
As in the book, except that in the book she developed, not just changed spontaneously.
He cut a bunch of details that didn't touch with the deeper moral issues; his gratuitis air raid scenes hammered the theme "war is bad";
Hammering a theme that wasn't in the book to begin with isn't exactly something to be proud of.
Or perhaps should Spirited Away also have had an antiwar theme grafted on and "hammered" hom
SOB director = director with artistic control (Score:2, Interesting)
Some of the most brilliant directors have been the ones who are the biggest control freaks. Kubrick, for example, demanded extremely exacting control over every facet of his movies' creation. That's how he managed to keep his art intact and coherent.
Ridley Scott's work on Blade Runner shows a similar link between hard-nosed directorial oversight and strong art.
Miyazaki is, I think, one of the few Japanese directors who really gets to make the whole production his. If he needs a spare half-million for som
Re:Miyazaki makes Pixar look like (Score:2)
Disney isn't worthy to learn anything from anyone. They have been a animation sweatshop from day one and old walt was a scrooge.
Re:Miyazaki makes Pixar look like (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Miyazaki makes Pixar look like (Score:2)
That seems like a kind of nit-picky point.
Plenty of points to pick at... you chose that a childrens movie produced in the 60's or 70's didn't have full-frontal nudity.
Re:Miyazaki makes Pixar look like (Score:5, Insightful)
Now of course if you dramatize the Greek Myths, there are details [pantheon.org] a modern audience isn't going to accept. Naturally, you can't show these details. But you have to be true to the spirit of the story you're trying to tell. If there are parts of the story [pantheon.org] you can't tell honestly, you shouldn't tell them at all.
Re:Miyazaki makes Pixar look like (Score:2)
That seems like a kind of nit-picky point.
Plenty of points to pick at... you chose that a childrens movie produced in the 60's or 70's didn't have full-frontal nudity.
HEres a better point. Disney has made animation onyl for kids. Disney has presented a neutered view of fairy tales and the world aroudn us. Disney is a souless corporation seeking to pay artists as little as possible for their talents as well as a IP tyrant. They claim IP to works th
Re:Miyazaki makes Pixar look like (Score:2)
Only americans don't want things to have genetals. The asians and europeans are fine with genetals. Many kid oreinted shows show male genetalia in those cultures because there isn't the same conservative taboo against sex. IT's a part of life get oevr it.
Re:Miyazaki makes Pixar look like (Score:2)
You see a lot of panty shots in anime or shots of girls in the shower, but in Japan all genitals are blacked out/fuzzed out/pixellated out.
-1 Redundant (Score:2)
Re:-1 Redundant (Score:2)
Yeah, his comment was way funnier than mine too. I am pretty sure that I started my post before his went up, but I was working on something else and it took me a long time to post.
Re:-1 Redundant (Score:2)
Anyway, I was never saying that kiddie movies should have full frontal nudity! But if Walt couldn't show satyrs without turning them into eunuchs, he shouldn't show them at all. In Fantasia, he pretending to educate his audience (including adults, which were actually the main audience for cartoons in the 30s) about clasical culture. Of course there are parts he has to skip over. But when he shows castrated satyrs, he's not skipping over the racy bits, he sugar-coating them into nothing
Re:Miyazaki makes Pixar look like (Score:2)
Re:Miyazaki makes Pixar look like (Score:2)
Just show them Akira and they should be freed from such assumptions. Or Magic Woman M or some episodes of Cool Devices and Cream Lemon or Ninja Scroll - I haven't seen Urotsukidoji myself, but I have heard it's pretty efficient for this kind of work too.
Milder cases might be persuaded by some choice episodes of Powerpuff Girls - the fu
Re:Miyazaki makes Pixar look like (Score:2)
On the other hand it's hard to get people to sit through an entire showing of Grave of the Fireflies, it's just so relentlessly depressing.
Re:Miyazaki makes Pixar look like (Score:2)
What could Lasseter learn from him? (Score:5, Insightful)
I think Miyazaki has creativity in spades, but I'm curious why you're bashing on Lasseter. I've been impressed by his creativity ever since the early days of Pixar, and I've been even more impressed by his ability to bring interesting and nuanced stories to the big screen. Getting anything even remotely intelligent through the Hollywood system is extremely difficult.
So is your criticism of Lasseter based on the plot of his stories, or the animation of Pixar films, or something else? Maybe I'm missing something. Miyazaki is obviously fantastic, but I don't think that means there can't be any other creative people in mainstream animation.
Re:Miyazaki makes Pixar look like (Score:5, Interesting)
What makes you think he doesn't? Check this article [animationmagazine.net]:
Lasseter noted: "Miyazaki is one of the greatest filmmakers of our time and he has been a tremendous inspiration to generations of animators. At Pixar, when we have a problem and we can't seem to solve it, we often look at one of his films in our screening room. Toy Story owes a huge debt of gratitude to the films of Mr. Miyazaki.
Re:Miyazaki makes Pixar look like (Score:2, Interesting)
Any criticism of Lasseter in this sense is totally wrong headed imo.
Re:Miyazaki makes Pixar look like (Score:2)
Re:Miyazaki makes Pixar look like (Score:2)
It's been a couple years since I saw Spirited Away, and I still chuckle if anything reminds me of a scene from it. Can't say the same for any Pixar movie. They only make me thing of trite cuteness and over-the-top voice actors hired for their name, not their talent.
The "no cuts" story is interesting. Had no idea Miyazaki was such a tough S.O.B. But I guess that goes with being a great filmmaker.
Re:Miyazaki makes Pixar look like (Score:4, Informative)
You should definitely read his description [nausicaa.net] in the words of Mamoru Oshii of the "Ghost In The Shell" fame:
My first impression was that he was a really light hearted person. But when the conversation got heated, he was really merciless, and I was told many harsh things. -laughs- So it ended with the impression like "what a SOB!"
Miyazaki and Oshii: two of a kind. (Score:2)
I didn't get a chance to see Howl yet, but Sen to Chihhiro aka Spirited Away and Innocence: Ghost In The Shell II are both incredible artistic statements.
Probably anyone here posting on this thread has seen Spirited Away, bu
Re:Miyazaki makes Pixar look like (Score:5, Informative)
It stems from a 1980's North American release of Nausicaa that had been licensed by some fly-by-night American company. Re-titled "Warriors of the Wind", it was severely cut (running less than 66% of the original's time), utterly incomprehensible, and a total disaster. Miyazaki and Studio Ghibli were so pissed off that they asked fans to forget the existence of the film and adopted a strict "no edits" clause for any future foreign licensing deals.
Re:Miyazaki makes Pixar look like (Score:2)
Re:Miyazaki makes Pixar look like (Score:2)
That was one thing that suprised me about the Miyazaki interview -- him professing that the English soundtracks were perfectly fine. Perhaps he doesn't speak enough English to realize how much crap Disney adds.
Re:Miyazaki makes Pixar look like (Score:2)
Which is unfortunate.
Re:Miyazaki makes Pixar look like (Score:2)
Fuck Disney up the ASS with a chainsaw. (Score:3, Insightful)
The asshole main character is shooting essentially nuclear blasts at the ocean under Laputa, and in the dubbed and "hearing impaired" version of the subtitles, Shita says "No matter how many weapons you have... no matter how great your technology might be... the world cannot live without love." What a bunch of bullshit pablum, written by and for suburban born agai
Mononoke's dubbing sucks as well (Score:4, Interesting)
There are heaps of differences between the correctly translated subtitles and the dubbed version in Princess Mononoke as well. For example when Moro is speaking of the attack of the boars, in the dubbed version Moro says something like:
"It's a trap. And a stupid one. But Okkoto won't listen. None of them will."
Whereas the correct translation is:
"It's a foolish trap. But Okkoto is no fool. He knows its a trap. But he will attack anyway."
Furthermore, the Japanese version has many silent scenes which are blabbered over in the dubbed version.
These and many other seemingly subtle differences give quite a different feel to the movie.
I acknowledge that dubbing is not an easy task. A direct translation would give very unnatural sounding dialogue. But my suspicion is that Disney's dumbing down on Miyazaki's movies is driven by the arrogant assumption that the audience is stupid and the story needs to be Americanised to make it accessible (and profitable.) They don't imagine that people may enjoy the story in its unaltered form, or that we may be interested in the perspectives on another culture. Yet its Miyazaki's Studio Ghibli, which puts creative integrity first (before profit) that is successful, while Disney is in a downward spiral.
Re:Warriors of the Wind (Score:2)
Re:Warriors of the Wind (Score:2)
Re:Miyazaki makes Pixar look like (Score:2)
Re the vice-versa, it's interesting to speculate if and when Miyazaki will do something in CGI. (If I'm not mistaken, Howl's Moving Castle used a few automated techniques that contrasted visibly with his usual low-frame-rate hand drawings.)
Re:Miyazaki makes Pixar look like (Score:4, Interesting)
Miyazaki has been using CGI since at least Mononoke Hime, if not before. He just doesn't go overboard with it, and he uses it in a way such that it's not noticeable unless you're specifically looking for it.
Again, something I think Hollywood could learn from. Even in live-action films, CGI effects have taken on a life of their own. It used to be that special effects were used to make something look real that otherwise couldn't be done. Nowadays, CGI effects are used for the sake of the effect - there's not even any intent to make something look real, the intent is instead to draw attention to the effect.
In animation, the idea has always been to make something beautiful but to use the animation to tell a story. The visuals are subservient; the better they look, the better for the film, but the whole reason the visuals exist is to help tell a story. Once the visuals start distracting from that story, and people start paying attention more to the look of a film than the story it's telling, then the film is a failure. Miyazaki is one of the few remaining animation directors that seem to understand that animation is no different than live action in this regard - that film, including animation, is a medium for telling stories. It is not a CGI showcase. (Hollywood seems to have forgotten this fact in live-action films lately too.)
This is the way I feel about at least some of Pixar's films. I saw Toy Story and I just didn't get it. The comedy was way over-broad in that bad TV sitcom sort of way, and it seemed to me that the only real unique thing about the film was its all-CGI visuals. Most of the reviews I saw at the time spent a lot of time talking about the visuals and very little talking about the story, except for the comedy, which I just didn't even think was very funny.
(There are Pixar films I think are pretty good - I liked Finding Nemo, for example - but in general they just spend way too much time worrying about the technical aspects of their films and not nearly enough on telling a good story.)
But there have been CGI scenes in at least the last several of Miyazaki's films, when he's wanted to do something that couldn't be done by traditional hand-drawn techniques. He just doesn't believe in doing things for the sake of doing it, he believes in doing what needs to be done to tell the story he wants to tell. Miyazaki's films are great because he first of treats them as films and not simply as "anime" (or "animation", which is all that word means in Japan), and second of all because he understands what filmmaking is really all about.
Re:Miyazaki makes Pixar look like (Score:2)
Nowadays, CGI effects are used for the sake of the effect - there's not even any intent to make something look real, the intent is instead to draw attention to the effect.
Re: (Score:2)
OT: one example of CGI used correctly (Score:2)
It used to be that special effects were used to make something look real that otherwise couldn't be done. Nowadays, CGI effects are used for the sake of the effect - there's not even any intent to make something look real, the intent is instead to draw attention to the effect.
Although in general I very much agree with the sentiment above, it is also a rather sobering to discover that at least some directors manage to use computer graphics properly. In Hollywood, no less. The best case in point: Gattaca [imdb.com]
Re:Miyazaki makes Pixar look like (Score:2)
Re:Miyazaki makes Pixar look like (Score:2)
One could even theorize that a deliberate rejection of "perfection" is further evidenced in the continued jerkiness of his 6-frames/second(?) animation... even though he could now probably afford denser 'tweening'. (For a pronounced usage of roughness for effect, see/remember the Xmas short The Snowman ...and the numerous tv
Re:Please God let me ignore the 'Anime' section (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Please God let me ignore the 'Anime' section (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Fatalism (Score:2)
I do believe the roots of this fatalism are way deeper than such recent history (and besides, what else is history anyway than a passing wind?). If anything, then a couple of atom bombs will only make a true fatalist shrug and say "told you so."
Re:Fatalism (Score:2)
Ah yes, those naughty blacks, looting while the nice white people "found" food in shops, staying in the superdome while the nice white people were "smuggled" out by the NG, even trying to save their lives by walking into nice white Gretna county until the brave sherrifs department fired over their heads, forcing them back into the flooded city.
Hint: maybe people in Kobe behaved better because their government a
Re:Fatalism (Score:2)
Still repeating that stupid loot vs. find hoax? AFP != AP, you know. Please find the white version of black police officers looting the local Walmart of color TVs after a natural disaster and get back to me. Looting, rape, murder, and mayham is not normal behavior after a natural disaster. Gretna started turning people away after looting began and one fire had already been started. Sorry, but if you're going to s
Re:Fatalism (Score:2)
Huge city, something like thirty million people, and pretty much guaranteed to get a complete pasting from an earthquake sooner or later. When the big one hits Tokyo, well... New Orleans will look like Boscastle.
Not to mention the complete wreck the USAF left of the place, and the repeated levellings of the city by Gojira and his comrades.
I disagree (Score:4, Insightful)
The one thing that many Miyazaki cartoons have in common, though, is that kids can watch them. This is especially true for Kiki's Delivery Service, Totoro, Spirited Away, and Castle in the Sky Laputa.
This is why I say Miyazaki reminds me of the old Disney in that he's creating stories that people will remember.
Re:I disagree (Score:2)
Old disney films was alright, Old walt disney was not. He was a pretty miserly old man who prolly would sell your kids for a buck.
Re:I disagree (Score:2)
Tigers Covered in Mud was pretty cool, though.
Re:No way (Score:2)
Re:God of Anime??? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:God of Anime??? Well... (Score:2)
Re:Tell me about it. (Score:2, Insightful)
Well, I started to watch anime because I find 'real' movies becoming increasingly disappointing. You also have to understand that not all anime
Re:I worry about Miyazaki... (Score:2, Informative)
He was interviewed about this once:
Question: Why do you always choose a girl as your theme?
Miyazaki: I don't logically plan it that way. When we compare a man in action and a girl in action, I feel girls are more gallant. If a boy is walking with a long stride, I don't think anything particular, but if a girl is walking gallantly, I feel "that's cool." Maybe that's because I'm a man, and women may think it's cool when they see a young man striding. At first, I thought "this is no longer the era of men