Card's Intergalactic Medicine Show 276
grammar fascist writes "Orson Scott Card's Intergalactic Medicine Show, a science fiction / fantasy webzine, went online just yesterday. Card, the editor-in-chief, has stayed true to his ideals: quality stories, author's rights, and trust in people's honesty. New stories are released quarterly, with new column installments added monthly to the current issue. New art is created for each story. There isn't even an attempt at draconian content control. Writers and artists give exclusive rights for one year - after that, limited rights. Card wants your stories and art, not your copyrights. I've finished the first issue now, and the stories are great. "Eviction Notice" made me cry, and I laughed out loud at "Loose in the Wires." I paid my $2.50 initially to support the business model, but the stories themselves are worth it."
Great for O.S. Card (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Great for O.S. Card (Score:2)
As far as the glory days of Sci-Fi, you really aren't going to get them back. Computers, Relativity and Quantumn Mechanics aren't vague incantations that authors can wave about and conjure stories from. These items that were science fiction back in the Golden Age, are today common place. Quantumn mechanics defines the size of computer chips. Our understanding of Relativity (special and general)
Re:Great for O.S. Card (Score:2)
Another way to support Independant Science Fiction (Score:5, Informative)
Another way to support independant sci-fi is to listen to Escape Pod [escapepod.info], the weekly science-fiction podcast magazine.
I'm not involved in this project, but I have been a frequent donor. I think EP is a very important project. To some extent, the sci-fi and fantasy genres are dominated by the feature film, the novel and the long-running series. The traditional vehicle for short stories, magazines, have a dwindling readership, and do not have the distribution that they once had at their peak.
EP seeks to create an audience, and perhaps one day a market for short, original science-fiction stories. I think this is a very noble and important cause.
Please tune in. I hope you enjoy it. You can find it listed on all good podcast directories.
Stresstesting server (Score:3, Funny)
Hey! (Score:2)
Pffft...Mormons (Score:5, Interesting)
Pffft. Leave it to a Mormon to actually implement a business model that respects the work's creator...
(I just spent last week in SLC. Can't say I agree with a lot of their views, but they are a very nice bunch of people.)
a very nice bunch of people (Score:2, Interesting)
Riiiiight. (Score:2, Insightful)
After my wife and I decided we'd had enough, we had nonstop unwanted calls and visits by guys in dark suits. Each and every time they came to our door we told them that we weren't interested, weren't coming back and that we wanted the harassment to stop. The bishop even told us that it was his "ecclesiastical duty" to continue the unwanted
Re:a very nice bunch of people (Score:4, Funny)
That's probably because they'll just convert you post-mortem.
But they sure are a lot nicer than Jehova's Witnesses.
I don't care what they do to me after I'm dead (Score:2)
Re:a very nice bunch of people (Score:2)
Had a lot of Mormon friends as a kid. I moved a lot and they always went out of their way to be very welcoming to new people. They made great friends. But when I got older and would talk to them about their beliefs I was totally freaked. "You REALLY believe all that stuff?", I'd ask. They'd just loo
Re:a very nice bunch of people (Score:2)
I think the Church has done a great job of making honestly good people out of most of its members, so in that they should be counted as quite effective and successful.
Re:Pffft...Mormons (Score:5, Funny)
Now we can get see the flood of anti-Mormon bigotry start flowing.
BTW The Mormon Churches website has instructions on how to view and or listen to their webcasts on Linux.
Thanks for saying that they are a nice bunch of people but just like every group you have some good and some bad. Frankly if you want to show your respect for them it is best too just not mention them.
Freedom of Religion is less welcome on Slashdot than a racially mixed wedding at a Klan meeting.
Re:Pffft...Mormons (Score:2, Troll)
Actually, most slashdotters are all about freedom of religion; which is why we tend to get so upset when people try to impose their religious beliefs on others. Mr. Card, for example, is well known for his belief that the government should outlaw homosexuality because god doesn't like it.
That is religious intolerance - when you try to force everyone else to behave the way your religion says they should b
Re:Pffft...Mormons (Score:3, Insightful)
He is voicing his opinion that he thinks that homosexual marriage is wrong and should be outlawed. That is called the democratic process. He is not declaring it to be illegal. There are people that have the opinion that children should have the "right" to have sex with adults. There are people that have the opinion that all sex outside of marriage should be illegal.
You have two choices.
1. You can as some-people like to put it declare that your scary skygod or FS
Re:Pffft...Mormons (Score:3, Insightful)
Yes. I'm sorry that you've endured brainwashing at the hands of no-doubt-well-meaning christian clerics, but the fact of the matter is that neither they nor any other spiritual shamen hold a monopoly on morality.
In fact, I'd go so far as to assert that any system of right and wrong based on the caprices of a god is in fact inferior. Such systems take the childish, "wrong is what daddy doesn't want me to do, and he'll punish me if I do it," paradigm and modify it to
Re:Pffft...Mormons (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Pffft...Mormons (Score:3, Insightful)
Bullshit. No real difference at all. Ask anyone married to someone of another race if the old laws should have been left in place. Also, it's not even subtle.
Re:Pffft...Mormons (Score:4, Insightful)
However, I *would* deny him the right to *criminalize" those who disagree with HIM.
To quote from Card,
"The goal of the polity is not to put homosexuals in jail. The goal is to discourage people from engaging in homosexual practices in the first place, and, when they nevertheless proceed in their homosexual behavior, to encourage them to do so discreetly"
IOW, the goal is to make sure that if you're bold enough to come out of the closet, you also must be bold enough to face arrest.
But there's a bigger issue here -- and that is the root policy of making sure *everyone* can be found in violation of SOME law, so that if they want to arrest you, they can do so. In Card's case it's being applied only to homosexuals. But what if the old laws still applied to (another poster's example) racially-mixed marriages? should those laws remain on the books too, just because someone disagrees with the practice?
Point being, any law that is *designed* to be *selectively* enforced is wrong.
Re:Pffft...Mormons (Score:3, Insightful)
You almost got it right. I don't think it's freedom of religion per se that is under attack. Rather, I see a consistent, pervasive demonization of religious people as a class. In short: prejudice, bigotry, condemnation of and hatred of people based on group affiliation.
And I find deeply disturbing some of the stuff that goes unchallenged around here.
Re:Pffft...Mormons (Score:3, Insightful)
Religion is not under attack, not on Slashdot and not in the United States. What HAS happened is that some evangeli
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job! (Score:2, Flamebait)
Such as giving the head of FEMA job to a qualified person instead of treating it as gift to hand over to his incompetant buddy.
But no, let's not blame the result of nepotism and incompetance on the guilty... obviously, no one could have anticipated that the levees would break, right? So it would have been the same mess no matter who had been in charge?
Man, seriously, when someone's incompetance costs people their lives, it MIGHT be time to st
Re:Pffft...Mormons (Score:2)
In your case yes it really would.
Omni magazine? (Score:2)
I'm definitely interested. My favorite magazine back when I was a kid was Omni. Loved the short story sci-fi they would always have there, and the creepy Giger artwork and all that. Totally bummed me out when they went all new-age.
I've been looking for a good magazine sci-fi fix ever since. This could be just what I've been looking for since I was a teenager, if they do it right.
Ummm... (Score:5, Informative)
Try Duotrope's digest [duotrope.com] to find them.
Daniel
Re:Ummm... (Score:5, Insightful)
We pay 6 cents a word up to $500. Stories can be longer, but the word rate drops with increasing length to always yield a total of $500.
With this payment we buy exclusive rights in any language or any medium throughout the world for one year from date of first publication in the magazine, and nonexclusive electronic and/or online rights in any language in perpetuity. We also buy nonexclusive print and audio rights throughout the world and in all languages for inclusion in multi-author anthologies based on the magazine, for which you will receive a pro rata share of the authors' share of advances and royalties, to be reported and paid when reports and payments are received by us from the publisher (or, if we are the publisher, every six months after one year after publication, if there are any earnings to report).
Though these rights are not outrageous, they are by no means extraordinary. In fact, they are more restrictive than your average magazine rights - usually they don't restrict your right to publish in other media for a year, like this does (eg, according to this you are not allowed to sell your story to any anthology for a year from the publication date...).
So essentially, whereas magazines normally only buy first rights (the rights to be the first to publish the story), this one wants to be the only one for at least a year. Respect for the author's rights? Really?
Daniel
Re:Ummm... (Score:2)
There aren't that many short-fiction magazines on the market today, so each additional one to be brought forth is worth celebrating.
Not that OSC would read slashdot (that would require an ability to listen to viewpoints other than your own), but as an open comment to him anyway: I, for one, welcome our new... oh
You arer kidding, right? (Score:3, Insightful)
nope (Score:2)
(I'm not suggesting Card's magazine doesn't have good content - but so do many free webzines out there, if only because they pay roughly the same rates)
Daniel
Re:nope (Score:2)
Re:nope (Score:2)
Daniel
Card's Ideals (Score:3, Informative)
Card, the editor-in-chief, has stayed true to his ideals: quality stories, author's rights, and trust in people's honesty...
...and flagrant homophobia [about.com].
Re:Card's Ideals (Score:5, Insightful)
You mean like equal protection under the law for the way they happen to be born? Or did you mean to marry who they want because they love that person?
When people talk about the political goals of a group they usually mean that they don't want that group to have the same rights as they do.
Take your pick. The anti-slavery groups, womens suffrage, womens rights, the people in these groups were denouced at one time or another (and to some extent still are) because these groups wanted the same rights for their members as the rest of the people had (usually white men).
exhibiting lewd behavior on "gay pride" day you're branded a homophobe.
So it's okay when heterosexual women flash their breasts (lewd behavior) during Mardi Gras or get felt up by their studmuffin while sitting on the park bench.
Re:Card's Ideals (Score:2, Insightful)
The Church is against this too. I am a Mormon, I have *many* homosexual friends, and we agree to disagree about it. They know how I stand, I know how they stand, and we are okay with that. They do their marches, and I send letters. I don't agree with the idea of same sex "marriages", and calling couples "families", but you know something? Neit
Re:Card's Ideals (Score:3, Insightful)
Heh. Yes, you've put your finger nicely on the problem there. Sometime in the last two-three decades the definition of "tolerance" has changed from 'tolerating', as you display here, to the necessity to actively approve the behaviour in question. A rather intriguing proposition when the behaviour in question is multiculturalism, to say the least; note that nobody ever criticizes Muslims for their anti-homosexual stances, for instance.
Am I a bigot?
Re:Card's Ideals (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm in favor of cutting the Gordian knot. I think there should be no (not any, zero) State sanctioning or involvement with marriage. No tax breaks (except for children, whose legal guardianship can be established). No tax hikes.
Want survivor benefits? Sign a contract. Want child support if the relationship dissolves? Sign a contract. Want social security benefits? (yeah, right...it's pretty to think...) Sign a contract.
The State should not be
Re:Card's Ideals (Score:2, Informative)
To the contrary, one can read Weinberg's express reasons for coining the word in interviews such as this one. [badpuppy.com]
Re: (Score:2)
More Independent Sci-Fi (Score:5, Informative)
Strange Horizons [strangehorizons.com] - a weekly e-magazine, donation-supported.
Futurismic [futurismic.com] - a monthly e-magazine (focused on futuristic stories and articles about future technology), also donation-supported.
I've been reading both of these for a few months now, and the stories are great! I'm planning to donate in their fund drives, because I think the quality is superb.
Author's rights WHAT? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Author's rights WHAT? (Score:2)
Yes, and the same as can happen with film rights (and frequently does -- studios often buy film rights to a story and then never produce the film, whereas it's rarer for a magazine).
And would this be resolved by the one year deal because if they don't publish it after a year you get your story back?
Yes. Most contracts have a time limit on the period during
spEnder's Game (Score:2)
PS the book 'Ender's Game' by Orson Scott Card is excellent, I recommend it to anyone.
LINK: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/081
Alternatives (Score:2, Interesting)
The man knows quality. (Score:5, Insightful)
OSC also is very active compared to other SFF writers in teaching the next generation to write. He's taught creative writing classes (and he's much more qualified than most who teach those usually worthless classes). He's written a book on how to write SFF, and a book on characterization. And, believe it or not, both books have solid advice...I taught myself how to write before I picked up his books on characterization and SFF, and I pretty much was nodding, going, "Yes, this is right...I do that already...yep, he's got it right..." What I had learned independantly on my own was confirmed in them. They're the only books on writing I've read so far that actually know what they're talking about...I've laughed a few others out the window for being absurdly incorrect on a lot of points.
I have the feeling that the new webzine is just another step in making a high-quality market for the next generation of writers. I wouldn't be surprised if this turned into the next, oh, I don't know...Azimov's, or something like Marion Zimmer Bradley's anthologies, or other SFF 'zine that was backed by a highly talented author, back in the "Good 'ol days".
Re:The man knows quality. (Score:3, Insightful)
cool! but can i get it in print?! (Score:4, Insightful)
It's great that Orson Scott Card is doing his own magazine! I've read some anthologies that he's edited, and they were very good. However, I'd really love to order this in PRINT, if I could, or head over to the magazine store to pick up the latest issue.
As much as we'd like websites to take over the print market, I just don't see it happening. I still want a piece of paper in my hand when it comes to reading. Even if it was on one of those nice new paper-like LCD screens, I can't imagine it would be an equal experience to holding a book in your hand. I think it's not resolution that is the defining factor here. It is something about the permanence of ink on paper that wins me over. When I finish reading a great story, I never want to lose it. I want to put it on my shelf so I know where it is. The harddrive is such a volatile place to store memories that you don't want to lose...
Current Best Souce of Science ficiton (Score:2)
Re:Yeah. PayPalPowered (Score:2, Troll)
Re:Yeah. PayPalPowered (Score:2, Insightful)
Uhhh.... no. My PayPal account was frozen when I sold something on eBay and there was a dispute between myself and the bu
Re:Yeah. PayPalPowered (Score:2)
Re:Yeah. PayPalPowered (Score:2)
Actually, of all the anti-paypal stuff I've read so far, none involved a fraud.
Plus, people commiting frauds tend to keep a low profile, because we're talking a crime punishable by law. You don't see whole public web-sites of people advertising that they've commited fraud against, say, a bank, any more than you see web sites full of peo
Re:Yeah. PayPalPowered (Score:2)
By comparison, PayPal is... what?
I don't know where people got the idea that PayPal was anything like a bank in the f
Re:Yeah. PayPalPowered (Score:2)
Thank you. That was actually the whole point: yes, it's nothing like a bank, which is precisely _why_ I don't trust them with my money.
Re:Yeah. PayPalPowered (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Yeah. PayPalPowered (Score:2)
Re:i'm sorry (Score:2)
Re:i'm sorry (Score:2)
Re:The guy is a fascist (Score:5, Insightful)
So you'd have to say that Tom Cruise never put out an enjoyable movie, that you never sang along to a Michael Jackson song in the 80s, that OJ simpson wasn't a great football player. People are different, some of the most talented are flawed.
What there's no room for in the 21st century are the black/white reactionary actions you espouse. If you disagree with Card's politics, fine. If you don't want to buy or even keep his books, fine. But stating that there's no room for "animals" like him? Way to paint yourself into that extremist corner and lose any validity for your argument. Try formulating an argument, support it with facts, and allow your reader to determine whether this is someone they want to support.
Re:The guy is a fascist (Score:3, Insightful)
he did know his target audience though -- angsty teens. ender's game appeals strongly to teens, because it's a story about getting ultimate revenge on bullies. what angsty bullied teen doesn't love a story like t
Re:The guy is a fascist (Score:2)
Re:In general we agree, but this gets to his work (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:In general we agree, but this gets to his work (Score:2)
On the topic of the Ender/Hitler thing, all we can do is ackno
You're safe with L. Ron, anyway (Score:2)
My brother bought a few of L Ron's together as remainder hardcovers, and Steve's pretty bread and butter as a Sci Fi fan. Eve
Re:The guy is a fascist (Score:5, Insightful)
Dude, me too. (Score:2, Interesting)
Recently I read some right-wing lunatic, post-9/11 columns by him. No attempt at reasoning, only 'must follow the leader; dissent is treason' kind of diatribe. That's when I noticed that he is an authoritarian.
Did you notice that in his books, democracies are the weaklings and loosers, and the strong (or shrewd) win? And what's with this fascination with genocide?
Re:Dude, me too. (Score:4, Insightful)
In fact lots of military Sci-Fi falls in that category. Check out David Weber's works for instance. Democracy is just something that gets in the way of chain of command in those books, and it usually does whatever the worst thing possible would be. He primarily uses it as a way to inject "bad" characters into the chain of command so his darling heros can show them up and look better in the eyes of the higher-ups.
Re:Dude, me too. (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Dude, me too. (Score:2)
Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: No, I don't think I do, sir, no.
General Jack D. Ripper: He said war was too important to be left to the generals. When he said that, 50 years ago, he might have been right. But today, war is too important to be left to politicians. They have neither the time, the training, nor the inclination for strategic thought. I can no longer sit back and allow Communist infiltration, Communist indoctrinat
Re:Dude, me too. (Score:3, Informative)
The cold manipulation of Ender in "Ender's Game" is hardly high praise for militarism. And the following three books in the series are actually even more anti-war and "liberal". (It is revealed that annihilating the "bugs" was wrong, for example, and Ender goes from being famous to being infamous.)
Not that I'd describe Card as authoritarian anyways.
Re:Dude, me too. (Score:2)
-David
Re:Dude, me too. (Score:2)
Re:Dude, me too. (Score:2)
Re:Dude, me too. (Score:2)
I certainly would say that you're reading his books on a pretty shallow level to see Democracies as all "weak": re-read the "homecoming" series, and for that matter, reread "Ender's Game" - you'll notice that the Formics are NOT-democratic (being a hive mind and all), and they fall against the superior talents of a group of people.
-David
Re:Deal With It (Score:2)
From the article you quote: The fanatical Left will insist that anyone who upholds the fundamental meaning that marriage has always had, everywhere, until this generation, is a "homophobe" and therefore mentally ill.
Sounds like you're on your way to proving that statement true. You don't by any chance contribute to MoveOn.org, do you?
Of course, I jest, but your assessment may be a tad extreme. Religious he is, but insa
Re:Deal With It (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Deal With It (Score:2)
Re:Deal With It (Score:2)
The "tolerance" of the right is just another myth like their support of states rights, their love of small government, their ability to be fiscally capable, the left wing bias
Re:Deal With It (Score:3, Funny)
Yes. Hitler was a marvelous painter, and we should praise his creativity. Maybe put up a statue, or contribute to a memorial fund in his name.
You can't mod me down for this. Godwin's Law must be followed.
Re:Deal With It (Score:2)
My beliefs are pretty "out there" myself and I learned at an early age to accept entertainment and knowledge from many different sources, even those who are opposed to my beliefs. The secret is to consider the material in its own light and realize that diversity of viewpoints is a good thing to be exposed to. Without diversity of viewpoint
Re:Deal With It (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Deal With It (Score:3, Interesting)
I think he's neither.
He's a writer who's done some good work, and he's a right-wing believer, but I don't think he's great, nor is he a fanatic as far as I've seen.
The last I read of his was the "Worthing Saga", which featured a race of ubermen recognised by their blue eyes... yeah, er, that's nice Orson, reeeeal nice.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Deal With It (Score:5, Insightful)
The Taliban are religious fanatics. Pat Roberson is a religious fanatic. Orson Scott Card is not a religious fanatic, he is someone who simply has views that differ with yours.
At one time in the Western world it was considered enlightened to have free an open discussion amoung people with differing views. You respected those you disagreed with, if they respected you, even if you had political disagreements. Even if there was NO ONE who would argue a certain point of view, someone would be the "devil's advocate", and argue that point of view - because to not expose yourself to a certain point was considered the height of ignorance!
How low we have sunk, to where one questions the sanity of anyone who disagrees with them, and will not have anything to do with them... and now, increasingly they want to throw people who disagree with them in prison, or at least make it illegal for them to speak in public.
Oh, bloody please (Score:2, Interesting)
So where should I start? He's a "rightwing religious fanatic"? Well
Re:Oh, bloody please (Score:3, Insightful)
The dark secret of homosexual society - the one that dares not speak its name - is how many homosexuals first entered into that world through a disturbing seduction or rape or molestation or abuse, and how many of them yearn to get out of the homosexual community and live normally.
Someone with this belief is pretty much the definition of a homophobe. It seems that Card believes being homosexually raped somehow
Re:Oh, bloody please (Score:2)
Well, yes, but from there to "insane rightwing religious fanatic" there's a bit of a difference. Someone can be one without being either religious or right wing.
"The rest of the article, as you point out, is a bunch of strictly speaking correct but irrelevant technicalities. Less objectionable I suppose, but the only reason one would want to raise them in the first place is because one is a homophobe --- it's similar to Neo-nazis raisin
Re:Oh, bloody please (Score:2)
No. In many places, including the territory of Utah, polygamy has been practiced, so it was not between a man and a woman.
2. That you did have the exact same rights as heterosexual people, including, yes, the right to a heterosexual marriage.
Would you say that blacks had the same right in 1940's
Re:Oh, bloody please (Score:2)
Just wondering, have you or anyone in your immediate family ever:
My wife & I have done all of these things, and I don't keep that fact in the privacy of my home. Why should other r
Re:Deal With It (Score:2)
now, "rightwing" is certainly true, and of course a "fanatic" is anyone who has strong opinions with which one disagrees, right?
-David
Re:Deal With It (Score:2)
Umm... no (Score:2)
The dark secret of homosexual society - the one that dares not speak its name - is how many homosexuals first entered into that world through a disturbing seduction or rape or molestation or abuse, and how many of them yearn to get out of the homosexual community and live normally.
Re:Deal With It (Score:2)
You might enjoy First Meetings In the Enderverse [amazon.com]. My local (Charlottesville, VA) B&N had the hardcover in the bargain/clearance books area for ~$5. It consists of four novellas, at least two published previously in Analog SF [analogsf.com] Magazine, and the other two perhaps published elsewhere. Don't pay even full Amazon cover price for it, though. Check for a used or bargain bin-copy, or patronize your local library.
The main reason I think you might fi
Re:Deal With It (Score:2)
I approve of going after writers for poor HTML... they're violating Niven's rule of "if you have something to say, say it clearly."
-David
Re:2 OSC stories in as many weeks? (Score:5, Insightful)
Have you actually ever read his work? Lots of fascinating ideas in there. Some are getting dated...ie, in Ender's Game there's a scene where Ender fools the other kids by basically signing up for a second account and IMing everyone, and while that stuff didn't exist when the book was written, it's common nowdays so probably doesn't have the same effect as it did not 10 years ago...but others are still interesting.
His feuding brothers are getting annoying, though. For some reason half of his brothers like to hate the other halfs' guts. But that's another topic alltogether...
and inane social commentary
Well, I find it nice that he's so involved with his community. Perhaps you find contributing to community inane, but I respect it.
The man is a racist homophobic bigot
Racist? Obviously you've never read his stuff. As for homophobic...perhaps, I don't like his opinions there myself. I don't think he's a bigot, though. A bigot is someone who never considers anyone else's view. I think he's someone who has thought about it, and has chosen his path, much like I've considered things, and I've chosen my path. Not everyone who is not all for gay rights or who supports Bush is a narrow-minded bigot, as much as I'd like to jump on that bandwagon myself and say they are. (wouldn't that be a form of bigotry itself?)
who deserves scorn and scrutiny
In that order? The scorn before the scrutiny? ::grin:: Perhaps reverse that...take a good look at what he's saying, then decide if you want to scorn everything, or not.
I'm not saying everyone should lovy-dovy-love him, just that I've found in my own following of his columns that he has more interesting, worthwhile ideas than not, and I've found I respect someone who contributes to his communties--SFF literature, and his local hometown--more than someone who bitches and complains but doesn't try to pitch in to help in their own communities. I do find his views on homosexuality to be a shame, though. And Bush. Bleh. I don't read his political columns anymore, because I know I don't agree.
(Heh, I'm such a moderate...damned because I'm not left-wing enough, damned because I'm not right-wing enough.)
Re:2 OSC stories in as many weeks? (Score:3, Insightful)
Freedom of speech means you don't even have to churn out second rate overblown sci-fi to have this right. "Bash, discredit, and spread hate" is your spin on what he is doing, others have other opinions.
Of course, on Slashdot, your opinion is the only Approved opinion, and all others should be mercilessly suppressed. Oh, well, unless they also pr
Re:2 OSC stories in as many weeks? (Score:2)
After all, there is no need for one to make personal judgements. Anyone who doesn't take your word for things is obviously a hate criminal who needs to be sent to the gulags!
Re:2 OSC stories in as many weeks? (Score:2)
Have you read his Memory of Earth series...? I thought
he treated homosexual characters well -- in fact, I was
surprised to even see them mentioned.
Re:Orson Scott Card is an asshat. (Score:3, Funny)