Babylon 5 - The Lost Tales Trailer Posted 140
Space writes "The trailer for the upcoming movie Babylon 5: The Lost Tales — Voices in the Dark has been posted at the official Babylon 5 site. The movie's pre-production was mentioned in a previous discussion. For more on the creation of the film, the CG Society has an ongoing series of articles about the production's effects development."
Hideous Web Site (Score:5, Informative)
Someone should send it to Z'ha'dum to die.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
The future is a dark and scare place
Offtopic? (Score:3, Informative)
Going -1 levels is not big deal, it is just something Slashdot is on wrong path with recent editorial policy changes. They are trying to be some site which copied it and it will really fail horribly. Looks like the reader profile already made their way and actually got moderation points.
Dear newbie moderators: "off topic" means something out of topic, completely off the base. It doesn't mea
Re:Hideous Web Site (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What is it with people ? There are very few places where using Flash is a good thing. Everyone and their cats now use javascript on their pages. People develop mathematical programs in Java.
What is the friking problem with those guys ?
Then again, maybe expecting them to use the correct tool for the correct job, or at least something other than "the hammer that is all you have" is a bit too much, hum ?
Re: (Score:2)
Babylon 5 was great... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Babylon 5 was great... (Score:5, Funny)
Quark was the best
Another Video Diary (Score:4, Informative)
Among other things you get a longer glimpse at the space battle scene shown in the trailer.
Link to Trailer (Score:2)
A direct link to a trailer mirror (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
@yg
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
B5 has a very rich universe and there is absolutely no need to keep rehashing those same old (some of them I really like) characters over and over again like they could create a story by themselves.
While JMS is no Tolkien (even with his own LOTR), he proved once he could write a very good story. Maybe he can do it again.
There's not much risk of that (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I wouldn't mind seeing a B5 TV movie with the old cast*, except that I *knew* JMS was not going to be able to resist throwing in his stupid technomages and was sadly proven right once I managed to find the trailer.
The technomages were an annoyance the first time around, but at least they were only in one episode.
Re: (Score:2)
It's an interesting group and, in the original series, I thought they could appear a little more.
Of
Babylon 5 - The Straight to DVD Tales (Score:2, Funny)
I'm also glad I'm able to notice the cheesy CG in an artifact ridden 300 x 400 flash movie. That means it'll be extra cheesy in it's full DVD glory.
Phew.
Re:Babylon 5 - The Straight to DVD Tales (Score:4, Insightful)
I didn't find the effects particularely cheesy there, I'm sorry if you did.
On the other hand, B5 always had to survive on a shoe string budget. One quoted number was that it at most for one episode, B5 got about 25% of what it cost to produce one Star Trek episode. With that in mind, I'm quite impressed with what they accomplished.
I always admired the designs and ideas of B5 and thought them to be inventive, ingenious and on the whole quite beautiful. Even if you're of course often more aware that you're watching CG, mostly due to the restrictive budget from what I can tell.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
This was one of the best things, in my mind, going on in Bab5. Yeah, the aliens had their anti-grav and super stuff, but Earth had the Starfuries with their opposing jets, the destroyers with the rotating sections. It was even better when they did the space battles with silence.
Loved that show. And my wife got me the complete series on DVD for Christmas last year!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Unfortunately, with a very few notable exceptions I don't think they've advanced where I'd like them to - in the "old days" it was puppets and cheesy special effects. The special effects got a lot better so the puppets looked silly, but what we got for the most part is aliens which all mysteriously are about 6 feet tall bipeds with two arms. If they're not, they're
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Who do you think is using said computers????
BTW, if I remember correctly, these B5 effects are done by same people who are doing BSG effects.
-Em
Richard Biggs a.k.a Dr. Frankelin (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Richard Biggs a.k.a Dr. Frankelin (Score:5, Informative)
Richard Biggs [wikipedia.org] tragically died at age 44 because of an aortic dissection.
Fortunately JMS has decided not to racast these roles.
Re:Richard Biggs a.k.a Dr. Frankelin (Score:5, Informative)
passion that cannot be described -- was diagnosed with lung cancer,
which by then had already spread to other areas. He quit smoking at
once and went on a healthy diet and vitamin program, but there was
little hope of a good resolution even though the new regimen was very
good for him. When we spoke about it, he laughed, and said, "Now that
I'm dying I've never felt better!"
His spirits were always up and positive, putting everyone at ease about
his condition, because...well, that's the kind of person he was.
A couple of months ago, he and his wife convened a dinner with me,
Doug, and Peter Jurasik, which was filled with laughter and stories and
good food. He wanted to know all the stories we never told him
because, as he said, "Who am I going to tell?" So we did. Because we
knew we were saying goodbye, and there would not be a second chance.
Last night, in the company of his wife and family, Andreas closed his
eyes and went away.
He lived an amazing life...full of travel and wonder and good
work...was part of the world renowned Peter Brook company...he saw the
planet, loved and was loved, ate at great restaurants, smoked too many
cigarettes...he lived a life some people would die for.
And, sadly, due to the last part of that equation...he did.
Memorial arrangements are still being worked out, but will doubtless be
private.
Andreas is gone...and G'Kar with him, because no one else can ever play
that role, or ever will.
I will miss him terribly.
J. Michael Straczynski
and about Richard Biggs JMS wrote [jmsnews.com]
pass along the terrible news that this morning, Richard Biggs passed away.
We're still gathering information, so take none of this as firm word, but what
seems to have happened, happened quickly. He woke up, got up out of bed...and
went down. The paramedics who showed up suggested it was either an aneurysm or
a massive stroke.
His family members have been informed, and all of the the cast have, as far as
we can determine, also been informed.
This is a terrible loss for all of us. Richard was a consummate professional
but more than that he was an honorable, stand-up guy. If he gave you his word
on something, you never had to wonder about it afterward. He was always
helpful and supportive of all the cast, even those who only came in for one
episode, always with a ready smile and determined to do whatever it took to
make the scene work. He was, quite simply, a terrific guy, and everyone here
is just devastated at the news.
More word as this develops. We may try to have some kind of fund raiser to
help give whatever assistance may be helpful for his kids.
We all miss him terribly.
jms
Re:"Now that I'm dying I've never felt better!" (Score:3, Insightful)
Oddly enough, that unscripted statement happens to be *quintessential* G'Kar..
Re: (Score:3)
"When we spoke about it, he laughed, and said, "Now that I'm dying I've never felt better!""
Oddly enough, that unscripted statement happens to be *quintessential* G'Kar..
He also said he really liked the G'kar makeup and that he felt it made him look sleek and sexy. I'm not sure if that's from the heart or if he's just having a go at us. The practical jokes on the B5 set are the stuff of legends. On the set they used to call Andreas Two-Pack G'Kar on account of how much he smoked.
The practical joke battle I remember the most involved Andreas and Peter getting to a con presentation a little early. JMS hates public speaking and is always nervous. Those two rogues coached the
Re: (Score:2)
No one can ever replace G'Kar. Never.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
No indication that it's going to be aired, from what I saw, on Sci-Fi or TNT/TBS/Whoever had the series for most of it's run. That was
Re: (Score:2)
Dissection? (Score:2)
What? You mean somebody cut him open and took pieces of his heart out, like something out of "Hostel"? That's wild!!
Or do you maybe mean aortic distension ... or some other word?
Re: (Score:2)
Alternative working title (Score:2)
It was real drama (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:It was real drama (Score:5, Funny)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Choate [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
I want to believe he would like it
Re: (Score:2)
It oughta also be +1 insightful. What ol' Zathras said is absolutely true; it is easier to get things done when everyone else's forgotten about you.
I always like Zathras. But even more than that, I liked his younger brother Zathras, who reminded me of myself. I just wish I could get the hang of the pronounciation differences among the Zathras brothers' names.
more info, no spoilers (Score:5, Informative)
more information from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voices_in_the_Dark [wikipedia.org] for the lazy amongst us:
Voices in the Dark is the title of the first Lost Tales DVD to be published
Voices in the Dark will be set in 2272. It will feature two linked plotlines viewed separately one after the other but covering the same 72-hour timespan: the first follows ISA President John Sheridan on his way to B5 for a celebration of the 10th Anniversary of the formation of the Interstellar Alliance. During the journey he unexpectedly picks up the Centauri Prince Regent Vintari (third in line to the Centauri Imperial throne) on the edge of Centauri space, and receives a warning from Galen the techno-mage about coming events. The second will feature Colonel (formerly Captain during the series' run) Lochley on B5 awaiting Sheridan's arrival, who summons a priest from Earth space to help deal with a mysterious, seemingly supernatural problem.[14]
Straczynski has stated that predicated on the success of Voices in the Dark a second installment could be released as soon as early 2008.[24] Peter Jurasik has stated that he was contacted by Straczynski to reprise his role as Londo Mollari for a set of alien centric stories after the initial batch centered around humans. He has stated that he said yes to him, "if you [Straczynski] wrote it, I'd do it".[25] The second installment is also set to include a story centered around the character Michael Garibaldi, initially planned for the first installment.[15]
In response to a question about Harlan Ellison writing for the Lost Tales, who acted as conceptual consultant and writer for the original series, Straczynski has stated that he is "sure that down the road I can get Harlan to do something for us". However, for now the studio is pushing for just himself to work on the Lost Tales according to Straczynski, stating they "want this to be you [Straczynski]" because the studio already knows him and likes him.[12]
One of the big events in the Babylon 5 universe that the Lost Tales is set to explore eventually is the Telepath War.[12] Straczynski reportedly stated at the New York Comic-Con in February 2007 that he already has a concept for a possible direct-to-dvd Telepath War story in mind.[24][26]
Straczynski has stated that David Sheridan (John Sheridan and Delenn's son) will both be mentioned in Voices in the Dark, and that he will be seen somewhere else, "in the next DVD"
Re: (Score:2)
Babylon 5 was a miracle (Score:4, Insightful)
Between the poor quality of the successor projects and the difficulty of getting anything good on the air in today's television market, the success of the original series is all the more remarkable. If you simply look at the odds, this show never should have happened, a statistical fluke. But the impossible happened. I wonder if JMS can make the impossible happen twice.
Re: (Score:2)
JMS's Jeremiah series was incredible problem was the second season Showtime wanted to change the show and JMS told them to pound sand, showtime still had a contract for season two so they forced it and season two is 100% crap.
rent and watch the Season 1 of Jeremiah. It will suck you in with the same vigor that B5 did.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes he did.
JMS's Jeremiah series was incredible problem was the second season Showtime wanted to change the show and JMS told them to pound sand, showtime still had a contract for season two so they forced it and season two is 100% crap.
rent and watch the Season 1 of Jeremiah. It will suck you in with the same vigor that B5 did.
Well, that gets back to my point. Shows have two big challenges: first, be good; second, survive the meddling of the networks. Jeremiah sounds like it was killed not long after the cradle, the main difference between it and Crusade is that at least Jeremiah had an intact and good first season. I never got to watch Crusade but I heard what JMS had planned was very, very good and the unmeddled episodes bear that out. Babylon 5 easily could have snuffed it at the end of any of the first four seasons. The mira
Re: (Score:2)
Yes. This.
This is why B5 has such a fan base.
It's not because it's a perfect show. It's not because there haven't been characters or individual episodes in other sci-fi series that totally outshined those in B5.
It's because it just told a story. There are few or no episodes where you finish and think, "fucking writer
Re: (Score:2)
It's because it just told a story. There are few or no episodes where you finish and think, "fucking writers are just killing time before the cliffhanger season finale, which will be quickly and easily resolved in one episode of the next season, after which we'll likely get more of this crap!"
Exactly. Take what many consider to be the worst episode ever, TKO, season 1. The A plot was what everyone hated bt the b story involved susan coming to terms with the death of her father. That b plot was one of the best of the season. Even when the show is bad, it's great. :) If clauidia had not pulled her stunt after season 4, she would have had lyta's role in the whole telepath storyline. Powerful stuff.
Way, way too late (Score:5, Insightful)
The best thing about B5 was that, originally, it actually felt like you were in a big universe. The most brilliant scene in the entire show was when Catherine Sakai is telling G'Kar about the time her ship lost power when "something" -- an object so huge it blotted out the sun -- cruised by. Sakai describes what happened and asks G'Kar what the thing might have been. They're standing in the garden, and G'Kar sees an ant crawling up a flower stem. He puts his finger on the stem, the ant crawls onto it and onto his hand, and then after a few seconds he lets the ant crawl back onto the flower. He looks at Sakai and says, "That ant meets another ant and asks, what was that?..."
But after the third season, all that was out the window, and all that was left was a bad space combat show.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Nonsense - nothing was rushed after season 3.
Several things were changed towards the end of season 4 because they weren't sure if they'd get a season 5 - which means season 5 feels more detached from the whole. But it was always the intention to show life after the war was over.
but how can it be great (Score:2)
I will listen to Ivanova.
I will not ignore Ivanova's recommendations.
Ivanova is god.
Where? (Score:2)
OOOOH! Here they are? Man, I've been looking for them forever.
Sufficiently high tech might as well be fantasy. (Score:5, Informative)
We are an arrogant people who for some reason think we know everything yet laugh at those who came before us for thinking the very same thing
Re:Sufficiently high tech might as well be fantasy (Score:5, Insightful)
People who think that 21st century science is the be-all and end-all of all knowledge display staggering amounts of hubris, especially since they are familiar with overzealous predictions like "everything that can be patented has been patented" and "there's a world market for maybe 5 computers".
Whether it's overused or not is another question -- that depends on the writer, and I think the B5 seasons treated techno-mages and psychics quite well. Especially compared to a certain Betazoid on TNG, whose sole purpose seemed to be, er, wear dresses and state the obvious.
But that does not a great show make! (Score:2, Funny)
If I want fantasy, I watch fantasy. Just because SciFi can masquerade as fantasy does not change that.
BTW, Dune 2 was horrible SciFi series with the ugliest actors I've ever seen. Especially that woman that was suppose to be "oh so beautiful" tha
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Out of all SciFi, baring Serenity, B5 is the best. But Technomages, prophets with flashes from the future and even time travel are used as storyline crutches. The whole mystery aspect of B5 is overblown and abused, the show would be much better if it was toned down.
"The passing of the techno mages" trilogy by Jeanne Cavelos does a lot to both explain and enhance the mystery around the techno mages.
:)
I too felt that there was a little too much magic and not enough SciFi surrounding the techno mages before I read those. Afterwards though, my feeling that most things in the b5-universe does have an explanation is stronger than ever. Within reason of course
Overall I'm extremely happy with the level of explanation versus mystery the show provides, but it does take quite
Technomages (Score:3, Informative)
.
.
.
The Technomage [book] trilogy which JMS has said is mostly canon, and an unfilmed Crusade script reveals much about the origins of the Technomages. They achieve their "magic" using organic implants provided by the Shadows. The Technomages' technology was originally used by the Shadows to create their ultimate warriors (in the same way that the Vorlons created a few "super weapons" like Lyta).
So it would look like magic to
Re: (Score:2)
B5 geek hat on:
Yeah, but the whole "Galen just happened to be in the Eye in time to disable the defenses with his zero-term equation so that the White Star could carry out Sheridan's commands" thing was just a little too con-veeeeeenient (said in my best Church Lady voice). JMS was definitely trying to spackle over a plot hole with that one.
Otherwise I loved that trilogy. And the Centauri one too. Okay, fine. I thought the Telepath trilogy pretty swell as well.
B5 geek hat off.
Wait, this won'
Re: (Score:2)
Fah! God Emporer of Dune was an excellent novel. It was simply different from the preceeding three. The remaining two books on the other hand, I would certainly agree with you about the quality issue. When I got to Chapterhouse Dune, the thrill was gone and I was just thinking "Blah! Blah! Look everyone, I think I'm a philosopher! Blah! Blah!"
Re: (Score:2)
Chapterhouse was also interesting, except for all the loose threads that it leaves hanging all over the place.
Re: (Score:2)
I approached the 5th book with a, "well, WTF is he going to write about now?" attitude, which may be why I hated it (and 6, which I could never bring myself to finish). Also, starting with 4, but really badly in 5, Herbert started sliding into the writing style which he used in seemingly every book other than Dune
Re: (Score:2)
True, but it's the best we have. It doesn't mean you can pass something off as "science fiction" when it has no basis in any sort of scientific knowledge or speculation. That's like saying, "Oh, in the future, we c
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
By idiot business people who can never see the future, you should know that.
Re:Sufficiently high tech might as well be fantasy (Score:5, Funny)
Then pat yourself on the back for being ahead of the curve: you're arrogantly scoffing at your contemporaries instead of at people in the past. Ain't progress grand?
Re:Sufficiently high tech might as well be fantasy (Score:4, Insightful)
There is also arrogance where a writer says, "If they accuse me of writing about magic, I'll just point out that it is in fact just sufficiently advanced technology", and then proceeds to write something that is really fantasy in terms of genre.
While we cannot predict what will be possible in the far future, we do know a lot about the world now. The important thing here is that I'm not talking about technology, but rather the many and various forms of literature and movie genres, the history of many religions, tribes and cults, the marketing of corporations, the temptations that even the best writers can fall pray to, etc.
Taking all those factors into account, it seems fair to hold the point of view that Babylon 5 includes fantasy elements (wearing the makeup of Clarke's Third Law), that it is not really trying to be pure sci-fi or speculative fiction. I'm perfectly happy to admit it might all be possible, at the same time as saying that I don't really think that is the point the authors are making.
Yes, it is entirely possible they wanted to play around with the idea of technology-as-magic. But by the time they've thrown in all the rituals, the astral plane metaphors, etc, you have to ask:
Are they still asking, "What if this could be done?", or are they in fact asking, "Wouldn't it be cool if these guys were like wizards, yeah, we'll call them Techno-Mages, you know, play the advanced technology card, etc.. ?" It's an exaggeration, but I suspect that the GP is right, and they are in fact including fantasy in their show.
This is not a bad thing in and of itself; that's a matter of personal taste.
Re: (Score:2)
Sort of the same way with the Minbari, actually - and the rangers. I think JMS transplatend too many Renfest ideas into the future.
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed. I say Let Global Warming Win!
Re:It's SciFi damnit! (Score:4, Informative)
Most of what you see in B5 is explained along the way in one way or another, some isn't. The future is an interesting place don't you think?
There are many kinds of SciFi that aren't strict, *hard* SciFi. The writer has chosen his path, and it's your choice to stop watching if you find it unbearable.
If you don't find B5 unbearable, then just sit back and enjoy in the knowledge that there are things out there, bigger and more complex than our current understanding of science and the universe.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Quick! Run! It's the SciFi Police!
Look, "SciFi" just a marketing label designed to make it easy to compartmentalize media in order to maximize synergistic sales. There aren't rules, canons and precepts governed by some international SciFi Body. And there damn well should never be rules like that either. Nothing kills creativity more.
Episodes of Star Trek, for example, could just as easily be
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
It's curious that you should deliver such a rant against such a short and fairly light-hearted criticism. It's like a guilty conscience! You know the show has flaws, but you just don't want to admit them, do you?
Bullshit. Authors like Harlan Ellison happily associate themselves with sci-fi (and also write outside the genre) without treating it like a cheap marketing ploy. And there are valid reasons for appreciating that there is a sci-fi genre with different implications to
Re: (Score:2)
Authors like Harlan Ellison happily associate themselves with sci-fi (and also write outside the genre) without treating it like a cheap marketing ploy.
I believe it was in fact Harlan who once said that there is a huge difference between "science fiction" and "sci-fi" and as a writer he wanted nothing to do with the latter.
Ironically, Ellison is probably responsible for most "fantasy-ish" aspects of B5, I mean "Soul Hunters" are straight out of Ellison's writings. I don't know this for sure, but having read Ellison and seen B5, it seemed obvious, especially considering his heavy involvement with B5.
Another writer (Theodore Sturgeon I think) once said that
Re: (Score:2)
An interesting historical point. I wasn't aware of the distinction between science fiction and sci-fi - could you provide it?
I tend not to bother with distinctions that will have no meaning to people not part of the group that have chosen to make it; it's as bad as cheap marketing ploys. Wouldn't be surprised if the original poster was happily using SciFi as an abbreviation for science fiction, good or bad, great and small. I understand the idea of specualtive fiction, because you could discuss the differe
Re:It's SciFi damnit! (Score:4, Insightful)
An interesting historical point. I wasn't aware of the distinction between science fiction and sci-fi - could you provide it?
I tend not to bother with distinctions that will have no meaning to people not part of the group that have chosen to make it; it's as bad as cheap marketing ploys. Wouldn't be surprised if the original poster was happily using SciFi as an abbreviation for science fiction, good or bad, great and small. I understand the idea of specualtive fiction, because you could discuss the difference between "science" and "speculation" to your average or intelligent person and still make sense. Even so, that's just to acknowledge someone's perspective - I don't think the term adds much value except for insider discussions.
I think Harlan Ellison created that "distinction in terms" when he made that statement. Not to say the distinction itself was not there, he just gave it name (however good or bad). What he was trying to point out is that what we now label as "sci-fi" got away from what "science fiction" was about. In general usage "sci-fi" came to mean stories that are about laser guns, robots, and women in bizarrely impractical tin foil outfits.Its stories that use "science" as a magical way to resolve issues without really dealing with them. It is stories that are more about the gadgets than people. It is about escaping the reality into world that has nothing to do with our own.
Science fiction on other hand is not about those things. It is about people and the world we live in. No matter how alien the setup is and what aliens, robots, etc are the subject of the story, good science fiction is always relevant to us here and now. All the standard "sci-fi" items are not the point of the story, they are just tools to set up the story in a way that may not be possible (or at least easy) with straight fiction.
There are many good examples of the distinction in recent movies - "I, Robot" the "science fiction" book was a deep examination of human behavior by extracting the idealized behavior and overlaying it on a machine and then viewing it from a human perspective (among many other things) - "I,Robot" - the "sci-fi" movie supposedly based on the book, but really about killer robots. Or "Mimsy were the Borgroves" - a brilliant short story about "nature vs nurture" and the effect of the toys on the way the mind develops - "The Last Mimzy" - a "sci-fi" movie based on the story that castrates any sort of meaning from original work and instead does a random children's adventure with even more random environmental message (where did that come from?)
B5, Firefly, etc all were good science fiction because if you take out the space ships and laser guns and aliens, you still got a strong story about something. I mean B5's big conflict of "community" vs "individual" is universal and applies just as well to "Vorlons" vs "Shadows" as it does to "USSR" vs "USA" in cold war or "socialism" vs "capitalism" in general. It is a fundamental conflict that's as old as time and instead of rehashing it again from one side or another, B5 shows what it is like to be the little guy caught in the middle.
Now, I just want to add, there is definitely a place for "sci-fi" out there and truth be told, I enjoyed both movies mentioned above - but there is no way I can call them good science fiction.
Although I see you have no problem making such subtle distinctions .. I'm wondering whether the definition of Sci-Fi will be a tautology that excludes the possibility of it ever being great fiction.
As I tried to explain above, I don't see this distinction as all that subtle. "Sci-Fi" as we come to know it is not meant to be good fiction - instead it meant to be the opposite - escapism and distraction.
But rather than dwell on trivia about the us
Re: (Score:2)
The most important point:
I'm a bit surprised you raise the question now, after it has been the entire thrust of my argument so far. Let me copy it from a dictionary: "stereotype noun 1 a an over-generalized and preconceived idea or impression of what characterizes someone or something, especially one that does not allow for any individuality or variation". The bit about not allowing for any individuality or variation is why I lost interest in B5 - it didn't fee
Re: (Score:2)
I'm a bit surprised you raise the question now, after it has been the entire thrust of my argument so far. Let me copy it from a dictionary: "stereotype noun 1 a an over-generalized and preconceived idea or impression of what characterizes someone or something, especially one that does not allow for any individuality or variation".The bit about not allowing for any individuality or variation is why I lost interest in B5
I raised that question not so much that I did not know what the word meant, but that I was not sure if you did. There are many things positive and negative I heard about B5, but this is the first time someone mentioned "the lack of individuality or variation". I really don't see that, in fact it quite the opposite - the show thrives on individuality. Its the first science fiction show where one alien cannot be easily substituted for another of same species.
Can you please give me some examples of what you a
Re: (Score:2)
-Em
Re: (Score:2)
Science fiction isn't mutually exclusive to these genres. It is mutually exclusive to fantasy. I guess that makes me the bad analogy police.
Re: (Score:2)
Exactly the thing I do not want to see in a sci-fi show. That's why I loved ST-TNG.
Re: (Score:2)
And the Minibari believe in refreshing cocktails one small bottle at a time.
Re:It's SciFi damnit! (Score:4, Insightful)
It's SciFi damnit!
As for questions of the soul, that's an area of pure speculation, same with prophecy. So long as JMS keeps what he presents self-consistent, all is good. Personally, I hate prophecy storylines because they've been done to fucking death. I think it's poor storytelling. But I have seen good stories with precognition. For some stories the precognition goes along the lines of extremely educated guesses, like a chess master considering the state of the board eight moves ahead, only in this case there are a million more variables to consider. In that case, the turning points upon which the future rests become matters of extreme importance and there's always the danger of the Influential Man, the wildcard that can throw off all predictions. I've also seen good stories that use a more mystical means of showing the future. The worst ones have the future written in stone with fate and destiny shackling everyone to a fixed course of action. The better ones have precognition show a web of potentialities for the future, the seer catching quantum ripples chasing down from future to past. All and none of these futures exist and only the present exists to make those potentials real, cementing them into past.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
B5 was a pretty boring show, running in endless loops of setup and premise about the grand story and only actually getting to the plot for a few episodes where everything would happen at once, then back to more premonition about the Shadows....frankly I find the idea of a direct to DVD movie about as appealing as stepping back in a time machine into the 1990's and watching it all over again.
You know what? I never really dug Farscape. I'm always open to new scifi and gave it a chance but the show just never worked for me. It's a damn shame, I'd much rather have enjoyed it. But do you see me going into Farscape threads and bagging on their show? Nope. Why? It's called courtesy. Try it sometime.
Re: (Score:2)
It gets a lot better if you think of it as Friends in space.
Farscape: great comedy, just-better-than-completely-shitty sci-fi.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I liked Farscape, Lexx, Stargate, X-files, First Wave, Earth Final Conflict, Outer Limits, etc..., but for a lot of B5 people the world seems confined to a B5 / Star Trek dichotomy.
It seems like at times B5 is "starter Sci-Fi" for people who never read much sci-fi or whose only exposure on TV was Star Trek.
B5 vs. Star Trek (Score:2)
Looking back at the 1990s sci-fi scene, what I remember is that people who read a lot of sci-fi tended to be the ones who jumped from Star Trek to Babylon 5. Partly because there was finally something on TV that wasn't just Trek (were there any other space-based shows in the late 80s/early 90s that
Re: (Score:2)
In the realm of television series, B5 was kind of a change of pace, but not compared to books and movies (B5
Re: (Score:2)
And in my experience, while many B5 fans looked down at Trek, Trek fans were more likely to be outright hostile, as if watching this upstart show would somehow be betraying Star Trek. Maybe it was a matter of the relative sizes of the fan bases, but if you picked a random B5 fan, chances were that he had seen (and maybe even enjoyed) a significant amount of Star Trek, but if you picked a random Trek fan, chances were that he had seen one episode, or had avoided it on principle.
Speaking for myself and my circle of friends when B5 came about, we were all huge trekkies who had gotten restless and disappointed with the direction the show had taken. The dramatic conventions and writing had grown stale, stilted. B5 may not have been anything new in the general realm of scifi (including books, comics, radio drama, etc) but it was certainly unusual for the small screen. The entire show was a breath of fresh air. A suitable Slashdot comparison would be the jump from Windows to OSX or Lin
Re: (Score:2)
I'm pretty lenient and can watch most tv sci-fi. I watched all of Enterprise. On the other hand, I watched only about one season of Voyager, then another few episodes when they had the Borg. I watched two seasons or so of Andromeda before giving up.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not perfect, but it's refreshing.
Please, if you're in a position to advance the cause of non-ADD-inspired, multi-season story archs with a definite ending, do so. Then me and the other pe
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I think that you give the game away with that sentence. The fact that you describe it as boring suggests that you've not watched many episodes, after all if it is 'boring' then why would you? This is further born out by focusing on the 'psi power' element of the show, which although very much present isn't the only game in town. Even here your assertion that psi power has never worked too well too well in sf seems slightly dubious in the light of how many creators have bundled it
Re: (Score:2)
Assuming, of course, you don't consider religion to be spiritual, given that religion actually seems to be increasing in societal importance over the last decade...
Re: (Score:2)