Nokia's iPhone, No Seriously 243
Several readers have written to tell us that Engadget has a look at Nokia's visions for the future. "It was presented during Nokia's GoPlay event this morning as a glimpse into the future of Nokia interface design. Oh, and it's due out next year. When pressed during the Q&A about the striking similarity to the little Cupertino device, Anssi Vanjoki — Nokia's Executive VP & General Manager of Multimedia — said, 'If there is something good in the world then we copy with pride.' Well, ok then."
I know I can't get a Nissan (Score:2, Funny)
But maybe I can mod this, and make a trade for a refurbed Segway.
Well, in any case, I'm holding out for the ZunePhone...
Re:I know I can't get a Nissan (Score:5, Funny)
Well sonny Jim, you're in luck! [youtube.com] Get squirting today!
This is S60 4.0 (Score:5, Informative)
Re:This is S60 4.0 (Score:5, Interesting)
For a more humorous take on what I'm talking about, check out http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=i
Re:This is S60 4.0 (Score:5, Insightful)
It's great that Nokia has such a wonderful phone for you, but isn't it even better that, coming soon, Nokia will have an iPhone-like device that will do everything you just described, AND work like an iPhone too?
Re:This is S60 4.0 (Score:5, Insightful)
Plus in the hey-day of MP3 player competition: Apple rolled out new models twice a year. I doubt that the iPhone won't be following the same aggressive product development cycle.
I'm not dissing Nokia for duplicating the iPhone interface (and definitely extending it with their handset experience.) What I am saying however is that Nokia will produce every kind of phone out there in their usual jack-of-all-trades-master-of-none design ethos.
They know that profitability is not about having the best phone out there, but having something comparable and half the price. (I.e consumer choice.)
Additionally one can argue that the two companies work in different markets: Nokia rarely cut out seldom used/confusing features in the fear that they'll strike off a possible buyer. Apple on the other hand will only include the most desired features and reinvent them with their particular experience in usability.
Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)
Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:This is S60 4.0 (Score:5, Insightful)
I think you're making his point for him.
I don't give a shit about how stylish my phone is.
I want one that lets me do what I need to do as efficiently as possible.
To date, Nokia kicks everyone else's ass in that regard. On average, the interface requires the fewest button presses to do the most common things, and it's relatively internally consistent compared to most other handset brands.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Nokia is the microsoft of mobile phones. Cheap, crappy and ubiques.
Re: (Score:2)
s/is/used to be/
There was a time Nokia kicked every other phone's but when it cam to robustness, usability and function.
Sadly that disappeared after the 6310i or thereabouts, coincidentally when they decided to move to S60/EPOC/Symbian...
I have a Nokia 70 right now, which I'd trade for any other Phone at the drop of a hat, including for Motorola even. And that is saying something.
The interface is
Re: (Score:2)
SMS integration into the Address Book would be nice. And being able to upgrade the firmware without having to go track down a Windows box...
But I will admit they made things a hell of a lot better now with "Nokia Media Transfer".
Re: (Score:2)
Phone interface (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Combine that with their full Intellisync package, and you've got the sexiest work phone ever.
I bet you were one of the people who were complaining about the iPhone lacking a keyboard, but now that someone else makes a touch-screen smart phone, it'll be the sexiest work phone ever.
Now I think Apple forbidding 3rd party development is about the worse move ever, but hey, it's happening anyway. Either way, the important thing isn't what features a phone has, but how well those features are implemented.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually it's the E70... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:This is S60 4.0 (Score:5, Interesting)
I'm an intern at Nokia Research right now. We all hate Symbian here. Symbian C++ is incredibly bizarre to program for, and this is coming from someone who thinks Haskell is a great language. You can make the phone OS either lock up or reset way too easily. If linux ever makes it into the flagship phones, I think you'll see a lot more innovation out of Nokia, because the developers and researchers will no longer be hobbled.
For example, Dlls are limited to a 1MB heap... unless you declare a new heap, then swap it out with User::SwapHeap. Of course if you call new on one heap and delete on another all hell breaks loose. Why have a hard limit on Dll heap size if you can just code around it?
Don't even get me started on the hacked together perl scripts that constitute the developer's kit (assuming you're a command line + emacs/vi person). Your SDK has to be in the root directory (or subst'd to be such), and your code has to live somewhere on the same drive - ie all projects live under the SDK.
The security model is a nightmare for researchers. You can't make the phone do anything genuinely new without flashing the phone firmware to a dev version, which means nothing you've written can ever be tried out by other people (nobody wants to flash their personal phone to the dev version), which means the idea will never make it out of the lab and dies from lack of exposure.
Bah. Posting anon for obvious reasons
Re:This is S60 4.0 (Score:5, Interesting)
How's the Visual Studio development toolkit going on? I was supposed to be project manager on that but they moved the whole project to Chezk if I remember correctly :)
I worked as Symbian coder for couple of years 2003-2004 and man it sucked. The whole development environment is absolutely horrible! But let's start from documentation. The whole documentation is directly generated from comments coming from .h and .c files. Often it lacked some necessary information which had to be googled or your software came crashing down. Sometimes it even gave wrong info and your software came crashing down. Documentation was almost useless.
And how about debuggin then? What's the idea with phone simulator (not emulator) that lacks of phone functionalities! There was some hack to get it to use Windows' TCPIP stack but no calls and no SMS. Simulator ran on X86 so you couldn't catch any of the ARM (or was it MIPS? Don't remember.) specific errors.
Building process was absolute mess! Perl scipts which had to be invoked from command line. Luckily I managed to create nice .bat file which compiled everything and packaged software to installation package. There was some weird thing with Perl also that you had to set some environment variables to get it working. Nothing of this was on the documentation of course. Just a notice, that you should not set this variable...
The whole architecture was pure shit. I've never seen a good C++ API and Symbian was/is no exception. Of course the lack of exception handling in the normal C++ way doesn't help either (yes, I know C++ didn't have exceptions when Symbian was first made but they was on experimental state and they could have added those later). I've heard a saying that if you need to inherit multiple classes (not interfaces or abstract classes but normal classes) there's something terrible wrong with your code. Well, I often ended up inheriting 3-5 classes and implementing 1-2 interfaces. Talking about good design...
And that's just the Symbian part. Add Nokia's Sxx or (Sony)Ericsson's UIQ above that with their braindead design and you get a very fucked up coder.
This reminds me when I was looking for a new job, I think it was -05, I got a phone call from London (I live in Finland) and they offered me a Symbian job. You know what I answered? "There's no company in the world that will pay me enough to get back to that horrible piece of ..." (I'm a gentleman, I don't curse when there's ladies around/in phone). Need I say that I didn't take the job? :)
Posting non-anon for karma whoring :P
Anssi Vanjoki (Score:3, Funny)
Re:This is S60 4.0 (Score:5, Insightful)
Because Apple were categorically the first company ever to release a pocket device with a touchscreen. History starts with them. The whole world of PDAs with network capabilities, picture viewers, mp3 players, web browsing capabilities didn't really happen. Companies like Palm who made small touchscreen devices, looked into the future, predicted the iPhone and copied the concept years before Apple did it first.
And I say that as a Mac Pro owner. Love their computers. Love their gear. Hate their fanbase.
Re:This is S60 4.0 (Score:5, Insightful)
One Word: Newton.
Yup, history certainly did start with Apple. If cell phones in 1992 didn't weigh 6-10 pounds, it probably would have had that inside as well.
The Newton Irony (Score:5, Interesting)
Q.E.D.
Re:The Newton Irony (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/history/q016
Please mod parent up (Score:3, Interesting)
The funny thing is that Nokia offers several great devices which should compete with the iPhone at half the price, but the iPhone defenders immediately point to the UI as justifying the cost. Once the UI is similar (and perhaps improved) in the Nokia product, what will the defense be then?
Apple didn't invent the smart phone. They didn't invent the MP3 player, or camera. You could argue that the Newton was a huge innovator, except it flopped.
Apple is not above
Re: (Score:2)
OTOH strike that - the demo doesn't show it can do multi-touch, so it must be better than the iPhone anyway.
Multi-touch (Score:5, Interesting)
The iPhone won't let me replace the battery, it isn't 3G, Flash doesn't work on the web, CSS doesn't display correctly, it has a low resolution, and the latest PC World (which normally loves Apple products) ranked it fifth out of the 5 smart phones they tested. They said video quality was shockingly low, and the only real praise they had for it was audio output.
As a typical cell phone, it lacks most of the features that free phones offer these days like song ringtones, multimedia messaging, etc.
For $600, some of the real basic missing features are just flat-out shocking. And when you compare it to smart-phones, I'd much rather have a phone where I can add apps, but maybe that is just me.
However, that multi-touch function sure makes it all worthwhile.
Re:Multi-touch (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Multi-touch (Score:4, Funny)
Thank you!
Why should Apple decide if it is bad or not? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Multi-touch (Score:4, Interesting)
But it can play a song, or even a video, on demand. Does your stereo or TV switch to a random song when you get a call? I guess it's not a multimedia device either.
The iPhone won't let me replace the battery
Sure it will. In about three or four years, when the battery life starts to get to be a little low, you send it off and you get a new battery.
it isn't 3G
Nor is the US. It does have WiFi which is far faster.
Flash doesn't work on the web
Boy, you got that right - which is why it doesn't matter much that the iPhone browser doesn't support it. I have not missed it at all.
CSS doesn't display correctly
It's almost ACID2, and I have yet to use a page in real life that does not work on it.
it has a low resolution
Compared to what? A Desktop? Compared to any other smartphone the same size the resolution is quite excellent, I can read Slashdot text almost without zooming in on the page at all!
and the latest PC World (which normally loves Apple products) ranked it fifth out of the 5 smart phones they tested. They said video quality was shockingly low, and the only real praise they had for it was audio output.
That's odd, the only thing I could find on PC World covering the display was this [pcworld.com] fragment:
"The screen: Tom loved the iPhone's 3.5-inch widescreen 160 dpi display. "Simply incredible," he said. "The color, the clarity, and the sharpness of everything." Universally, this has been the reaction of everyone who's seen my iPhone. "Oh my, just look at that screen!" "That's incredible!" "Heck, that looks nicer than my TV, much less my cell phone!"
The videos on Apple's site really don't convey just how nice the display really is."
Unless you have some other link you'd care to share to make your point?
For $600, some of the real basic missing features are just flat-out shocking.
If you thought that was shocking you should try buying an unlocked RAZR and despair at what you just payed for. The iPhone is a bargain at twice the price.
WebKit and CSS (Score:2)
Other way round (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:This is S60 4.0 (Score:5, Informative)
Actually, the Casio PB-1000 was the first to have this feature in 1987.
Apple also had competition in the PDA market when it first introduced the Newton in 1993. The Casio Z-7000 "Zoomer"/Tandy Z-PDA were introduced a couple months later. These devices also featured a touch screen with handwriting recognition.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
The N80 has an absolutely bewilderingly terrible interface. It's as though they took a list of all of the configuration options, then randomly grouped them together, then randomly assorted those groups into a hierarchical set of menus three deep.
Yesterday, in fact, I wanted to change my ringtone to something loud and conspicuous so I could hear it outdoors. (I usually keep it on vibrate). I couldn't find a way to preview the ringers without actually calling the damn phone.
The N80 may have a zillion
Re:This is S60 4.0 (Score:5, Interesting)
Ouch. Never used one, but according to forum chatter that one was a lemon. On paper a great device, but way too slow CPU and gimped battery.
It has gotten better, though. The latest batch of 3rd ed phones are quite good (E90, N81, N95*).
* Make sure you get the second edition of the N95 (the soon-to-be-released US or the just released 8GB one), the first ed is a bit short on RAM and battery. I got one of the 1st ed myself, and it is almost a small laptop in my pocket; the functionality is mainly gimped by Nokia skimping on the RAM.
As has now become tradition, nokia will require that every single piece of software be signed before installation
It isn't quite that bad. "Please notice that Symbian Signed is not mandatory, if your application uses only unrestricted APIs or user-grantable capabilities." http://www.forum.nokia.com/main/technical_service
Still, the process for signing is too cumbersome for most freeware / FOSS devs to be bothered with. It's unfortunately a sad state, because smartphones really need a good open platform for 3rd party devs and Nokia seems to be going in the wrong direction here. And it is likely that we'll have to wait a long time for Apple to release an iPhone SDK, too. Once you unjail the thing there doesn't seem to be any sort of security at all; at the very least, Apple needs to sort out a security model first. WinMobile? Oh, don't get me started...
The only other ray of hope is Linux, it will be interesting to see if efforts like OpenMoko are successful. I really hope so, because as I said we need a good open platform for small mobile devices. Even a moderate success might cause Nokia and others to open up their platforms a bit more (just like the iPhone is causing them to revisit their UIs).
Something good in the world? (Score:4, Funny)
Technology demo... (Score:2)
Turn it on its head (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Turn it on its head (Score:5, Informative)
Noah Wylie, while playing Steve Jobs said that "good artists copy, great artists steal"
That quote is stolen from Picasso, I believe.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Turn it on its head (Score:5, Insightful)
You forget, Apple is leveraging decades of ideas in cell phone technology for their product that they never thought of. Sure they have a lot of great new ideas, but I don't see other folks using their ideas as stealing. No more than I see Apple building a cell phone as stealing.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm actually pretty excited to see iPhone features make their way into non Apple products. Sure it is blatant idea theft. Sure Nokia is leeching whatever "coolness" they can from Apples form factor. Who cares? We have PCs that aren't proprietary because of blatant idea theft. Hell, we really wouldn't have spinning cubes in Linux were it not for ideas presented in other operating systems. Noah Wylie, while playing Steve Jobs said that "good artists copy, great artists steal". I do not mind getting quality (if Apple like) features at a lower price than Apple is willing to offer.
The problem is that most just copy and don't actually "steal". "Looking just like the original" isn't enough, it has to act like it too. And the fact that they didn't show any multi-touch features means Nokia is merely a "good" artist.
Can't anyone see it's a joke/hoax? (Score:2, Insightful)
It's clearly a poke at Nokia saying, "They are simply going to rip off Apple after the iPhone, and we think they'd go this far". Come on people! Apple DID file a handful of patents on this.
Re: (Score:2)
It's clearly a poke at Nokia saying, "They are simply going to rip off Apple after the iPhone, and we think they'd go this far". Come on people! Apple DID file a handful of patents on this.
Re:Can't anyone see it's a joke/hoax? (Score:4, Informative)
Nokia had a huge launch event in London on the 29th to announce a US 3G version of the N95, the N81, the new version of the N-Gage platform, the Ovi brand (maps, games, & other services), as well as to demonstrate the touchscreen S60 interface mentioned in this article.
Re:Can't anyone see it's a joke/hoax? (Score:5, Informative)
Probably a marketing ploy (Score:4, Insightful)
Nokia's high-end products have always been head and shoulders above the rest. Its current top of the range models are arguably better than the iPhone, possibly excepting the design and touchscreen. When Nokia do launch this device, or a similar one, I've no doubt it will support technologies such as HSDPA (3.5G), multimedia messages, uPnP media sharing, third party (unsigned) applications and all the multimedia functions us Europeans have come to expect from Nokia's "multimedia computers".
There is no doubt in my mind that Apple are the proverbial Rolls Royce of desktop computing, however I'm not too sure of their credentials in the global mobile telephony market - I just don't believe they "get it".
Re: (Score:2)
You're kidding, surely?
They don't support that now, intentionally. I know developers hate the whole SymbianSigning thing, but are you really suggesting that they'll listen to developers and stop that somehow?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The N70 is 2nd edition device, so that will run unsigned applications, but the other two are 3rd edition and won't. Of course, I'm talking about native applications (ie written in C++), not java/etc.
This has been the main problem for developers targeting S60 3rd edition. Even freeware needs to be signed (a slow, slow, slow process). You can sign them yourself, as a developer, so they'll run only on your own phone (or a small selection) but they've been cracking down on that over the
Re: (Score:2)
This is especially a problem for freeware / FOSS because many of them need their applications signed. It is supposed to be a quick and non-painful process, but many devs are frustrated at the moment. http://mobile.antonypranata.com/2007/08/09 [antonypranata.com]
Re: (Score:2)
And still rather crap. I've got a Nokia Symbian phone with all the features I could ever want; a 3.2 megapixel camera with a decent point and shoot lens, video chat, 3G, radio, mp3-player, PDF reader, video player, web browser, blue tooth, irda, etc. etc.
But it is still shit. Every single feature feels like loosely connected applications rather than a part of an integrated whole. Every feature is just a little bit awkward, making
Apple iPhone Patents? (Score:3, Insightful)
How long before we see Apple's lawyers get on Nokia for patent infringement?
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
That'd be a really long time. I don't think anyone, Apple least of all, believes that the iPhone wouldn't accidentally tread on at least one Nokia patent. A lawsuit would no doubt result in a codified arrangement that's otherwise equivalent to the current tacit agreement. Basically, a cross-licensing agreement that allows both companies to use both sets of patents.
It's really not worth it for either company to spend the money on law
Re: (Score:2)
There's copying... (Score:4, Insightful)
So not dubious - shameless. Yeesh.
Re: (Score:2)
So what do you want instead? Do you want Apple to patent, trademark, copyright, and encrypt, the hell out of the entire iAlphabet range of potential products and how they might work just so nobody can copy them? Why are patents used to prevent copying of innovative ideas judged to be bad when they are owned by certain companies, while copying a great idea is judged to be bad when the item being copied was engineered by some "holy grail" company or nerd god?
For $DEITY's sake, what Nokia may not be very or
Re: (Score:2)
More likely, Nokia w
Re: (Score:2)
You misunderstood my message. The game I'm refering to has only one outcome: "patents are bad". Until, that is, this stance suddenly doesn't fit the /. dogmas after all, because then it suddenly has multiple ones. Hence the cookie applies, even if I don't say so at all.
Note that it's not the game I personally play, as I don't agree that patents are either bad or panacea, but it's the game that many people on /. play when the whole attacking concept of IP.
Yawn... (Score:2, Insightful)
High-end phone interfaces lapping Microsoft (Score:2, Interesting)
It's not the hardware that makes this an iPhone clone, it's the look and feel of the interface. Hell from that poor quality video they posted even the UI colours seem to be the same.
Also Apple have patents on the UI behaviour up the wazoo.
On the other hand Nokia won't lock their device to particular networks, make it unlockable, and sell
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
There is not a Nokia phone made today that the Apple iPhone doesn't blow out off the water "value-proposition-wise" with it's first iteration. The very bankruptcy of Nokia's idea mill is shown by the very subject of this thread; the announcement that they are going to try to copy the iPhone.
What do you mean by "Nokia's more mature interface"?
Isn't that just spin for "old-fashioned?" Also the iPhone runs OS-X a variant of Unix. I think that Unix
Talk about "strong bias"... (Score:5, Insightful)
The iPhone might look very impressive in the USA, where cell phones seem to have been stuck in the early 90s (your theory that Motorola was ever "the cellphone of choice" confirms this), but it's a joke compared to any modern european or asian smartphone. Why do you think Apple is limiting it to the US? Because that's the only place where they'll be able to sell something so underpowered for such a high price. Sure, there are some Apple fanbois in Europe too, but there's also real competition (phones come unlocked, and there are lots of operators). The iPhone needs to go through at least three iterations until it is ready to be sold in Europe and Asia, and the competition (Nokia, Qtek, Sony-Ericsson, etc.) aren't exactly sitting still.
You don't understand how Nokia works (Score:4, Insightful)
It seems that you don't understand how Nokia works. Nokias competitive advantage isn't design or superior technology, it's main competitive advantage is mass production of phones and phone models. Yes, Nokia doesn't just produce massive amounts of phones, it produces massive amounts of different phone models. The idea is simple, produce as many phone models as quickly as you can, and hope that at least few will be big hits and the others will just do.
It also seems that you really don't have a grasp of mobile phone markets. Nokia isn't just top at the moment, they have been for almost the last 10 years at the top. They currently have 37% market share globally. They are the most profitable mobile phone company not just now, but have been for the long time being. When we look at technology, production and marketing abilities, there really isn't any other phone company as Nokia.
On technology wise Symbian is the number one mobile OS. It was originally developed for the handhelds and has been powering them from the days of Psion. Most of the smart phones in the world are powered by Symbian and the platform has support not just from Nokia and Sony-Ericsson, but from other handset manufacturers also. As what comes to interface, yes the iPhone has a pretty interface which polished to death, but news flash, that same polishing can be found from the newer phones. Also it should be noted, it just isn't one interface Nokia is catering, they have Series 60, they are Series 40, they customize and try quite a lot. They may not be as innovative as Apple, but why be when they can just copy, imitate and mass produce.
As to your question about what happens when and if Apple will produce its low market version of iPhone, the answer to that one is easy: Nokia will just copy it, produce handful of new models, drop margins if needed for those phones and make sure that there is no way for Apple to succeed in the market. Actually I would argue that for now it's even impossible for Apple to try to gain any strong foothold from the markets, they have shown their cards are they are being copied and out imitated. It should also be noted that Apple isn't known to play in the mass production league, they are a company serving niche segments and are to do that with a bigger gross margin.
I would suggest that you take a visit to a Nokia NYCs Store or maybe visit their European pages to see on just what and how much they offer. Nokias European homepage [nokia.com]
Re: (Score:2)
There is a very mysterious form of logic at work here.
I own an expensive Nokia. Do I therefore "know" that "the majority of Nokia's sales" are high-end phones?
Until Apple comes up with a keyboard and an open apps platform, they're not blowing Nokia out of the water
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
By all accounts I'm an Apple fanboy, but reading your post I think you have me down as a Nokia/Symbian fanboy or Apple hater! I guess I tried too hard to be balanced or reasonable. Or pessimistic.
Mature simply means that they've been doing phone UIs for years. Of course that does mean they were set in their ways and concepts, whereas Apple could come straight in an refine the current state of the art into the iPhone's UI, which is smooth and exce
But it's not OpenMoko! (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Engadget called (Score:2, Redundant)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
While copying virtually the entire story into the summary seems a bit much I don't really think your statement is profound or informative. Thanks for the link though, it would have been useful if I'd missed the great big blue one in the article.
Copying is OK (Score:2)
Remember, kids. Copying someone's "intellectual property" is A-OK if you're a mega-corporation, but a crime if you're trading MP3's in your basement. Got that? Good.
Re: (Score:2)
Why is everyone so hard on iPhone (Score:5, Insightful)
Frankly, for the last two years I've kept a Razr and a video iPod crammed in my pocket, and I'm happy to have one device, that also gives me internet when I need it, in a single device. I wish it had 3G and some other things, but it's also a first generation device. The first iPod kinda sucked too, but not so bad it didn't make a big impact.
Regarding price, AT&T, and other 'problems' people talk about, get over it. If T-mobile is better for you, go with 'em. Nobody is forcing you to use an iPhone if you don't want to.
By analogy: When I was shopping for a car recently I looked at cool 50K sports car that only seats 2. Well, I drive around with friends a lot and a 4 seater is much more my speed, and I got one with lots of power for about $30K. I could say, as some do with the iPhone, "It only seats two and costs $50K! I can get a 4 seater for half that." So get the freakin' 4 seater.
The iPhone is clearly a luxury device designed for a certain market, but not all markets. Is all the griping over this to protect a moron from going into and Apple store, dropping $600 and saying, "WAit, this isn't what I wanted at all." People aren't that dumb, and if they are and have that kind of money, let 'em. Frankly, no cell phone could be perfect, especially with this group. Someone did an analysis on Slashdot I think of the 'ideal' mobile device and then proved it couldn't be made by any one manufacturer because of patent and licensing issues. Go get the phone with the features you want. I showed my iPhone to my parents and they said, "Hmm, we just need a phone that makes phone calls." So I helped them find a simple phone with big buttons because that's what they needed.
Or is all the griping because you secretly want an iPhone and are frustrated because you can't justify the cost because it doesn't have a feature you truly need. Hmm. I think a lot of the bitching about the AT&T lockout is becuase people still have contracts they can't cancel and really want one. Life's not fair (and yeah, as an AT&T customer for some time now they kinda suck, but what tradeoffs are you willing to make?) IF you're not willing, nobody is forcing you to.
model proliferation (Score:2)
That is not the whole story. Take a look at Nokia's product lineup, a really close look, and you discover something very curious. They have dozens of phones at any given time, and dozens of features, all mixed around in ways that don't make sense to consumers. I know, I tried for two years prior to iPhone to find a phone that would annoy m
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
The argument has usually been applied to hardware. It is better to have less hardware choice - graphics card, keyboards, processors. In the present case it is being applied to features.
It ignores the way markets and products actually work. Nokia or whoever produces all these different
Reality distortion field (Score:2, Insightful)
But the fact is, pretty much any Qtek PDA or Nokia "tablet" cellphone beats it in specifications, fea
Um Allo?! (Score:2)
The GPhone! [last100.com]
Too bad Slashdot didn't run this, it would have made an interesting conversation even if it was fake
My current phone is free (totally) so buying an expensive one kind of sucks, the prices are massively inflated (as evidenced by their lake of VOIP software), the Gphone doesn't seem to have these problems as much as it has advertising problems (which might be solved with sa
Nokia have been closer for quite some time (Score:2)
Anyone doing a hinged dual-screen phone? (Score:2)
Smith & Wesson to join the convergence market (Score:3, Funny)
Shooting ranges will be equipped with devices that communicate with the firearm to inhibit the calling of 911 and instead log the information to your PDA or other portable computing device to analyze your shooting proficiency.
Of course. the !Phone can also be used to make phone calls. The keypad will be located on the left side of the grip (or right side for the left-handed model), the microphone at the base of the grip, and the speaker just below the tip of the barrel. Flipping the safety answers the call.
The !Phone accepts multiple batteries which are loaded in the clip. You can install more batteries for longer charge duration at the expense of ammunition at launch, but they are continuing development of a dual-purpose battery-bullet that can be fired once fully discharged.
A variety of !Phone holsters will be available.
Re:well duh (Score:4, Funny)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N-Gage [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Hype (Score:4, Insightful)
(*digits of pi in base 4)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Hell, I don't even have to own an iPhone to test it.
http://www.testiphone.com/ [testiphone.com]