A Belated Halloween History - Monsters Edition 24
uriah923 writes "Nick Dilmore has published the second edition in his Snarky Halloween History series, featured on Slashdot last year. This time around, he concentrates on movie monsters: vampires, werewolves and zombies. From the article: '[D]id you know the movie monsters we've all to come to know and love (in a platonic way, of course) have colorful histories stretching back to the earliest civilizations? What, you didn't think some Hollywood hack actually had enough imagination to invent vampires, werewolves, and zombies, did you? Silly, silly non-monster-trivia knowing person.'"
news for nerds? (Score:1, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
No no no, it's Slashdot's uptime is our downtime.
Wow! (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
What? You don't watch Robin Hood on TV? Just look what that evil sheriff does to his people!
Yes, we know (Score:4, Interesting)
Someone who did some basic research, rather than just reproducing what Wikipedia says, might could even have written an intersting article about the subject.
This article deserves to be eaten by the Snark [literature.org] - one monster that is not based on folklore!
Re:Yes, we know (Score:4, Interesting)
(defining) Halloween: [0catch.com] A pagan holiday perpetuated by the American Dental Assoc.
{insert obligatory HAIL ERIS ALL HAIL DISCORDIA
recommended reading (Score:2)
He makes a pretty good argument for the origin of the vampire legend being in the spread of tuberculosis in isolated farming households. The first victims die, then one by one other family members begin to waste away, often resulting in the extinction of the entire family. However, don't let this scientific explanation turn you off, the stories are creepy enough, only it's the living, not the dead, w
Re: (Score:2)
And then there's the whole TV news myths of inner city violence to keep people in the suburbs.
And welcome to SlashFark (Score:1, Insightful)
for those too lazy to read the entry (Score:1)
Meh ... belated (Score:2)
Lame and uninformative... (Score:1)
Do the editors think we are morons? (Score:3, Interesting)
Do the editors think we are morons? Or was this article just posted so anyone with an IQ > 60 could rip this loser a new one?
I think the fact that I'm about comment #13 on a seven-hour topic says it all...
But wait.... (Score:2)
The thing I find amazing is quite the contrary: the incredible number of people who seem to think that vampires are in some sense 'real.' Now, I don't mean that they seriously think that the most likely thing to have happen to them in a back alley after midnight is that they get their throats bitten, but in the sense that they will have arguments about whether vampires 'really' have reflections or are 'really' stopped by running water—as if there were at least a cultural tradition to refer to and disc
know and love (Score:2)
Speak for your self...