Star Trek CBS Series To Be Streamed Internationally On Netflix (variety.com) 161
An anonymous reader writes: Netflix has announced that it has secured a deal to stream every episode of the new Star Trek TV series within 24 hours of its original network broadcast. However, neither the U.S. nor Canadian subscribers are included in the deal, which otherwise covers every territory that Netflix operates in worldwide. Stateside viewers will be able to stream the new show via CBS's own All Access digital subscription video-on-demand and live streaming service, with Canadian streaming provisions yet to be announced. The deal represents a potential major step forward in the company's determination to bypass regional licensing, and at one stroke eliminates the typical years of delay that occur when a U.S. program seeks foreign audiences.
One word: (Score:5, Insightful)
torrent
Re: (Score:1)
CBS Access sucks. Tried it last year and it is literally 6 minutes of commercials every 15 minutes. Commercials pop up in the middle of scenes. After 2 months, I couldn't take it anymore.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: One word: (Score:5, Insightful)
" people didn't watch it"
Which is why there are... 14 movies, 5-6 TV series, an animated series, at least a dozen games based on the franchise, etc.
Yup, Paramount/Desilu just said FUCK IT, WE'RE GOING TO DUMP MONEY DOWN THIS USELESS HOLE FOR NO GODDAMNED REASON!
Re: (Score:2)
Except that people did watch it. Religiously. For decades. I wasn't even around for the original run of the series, and I watched it every week when I was a kid.
In other words (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Because they created their own steaming service, and they think they can compete with Netflix in the U.S. with one original show.
Not so much bypassing regional restrictions.... (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Geo-barter. Plenty of Europeans are trying to bypass region lockouts on popular series not available to them, maybe you can work out a deal where they borrow your connection and you borrow theirs.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
But alas, as I'm in the U.S. I will have to wait till it comes out a year later on US Netflix. I will survive..somehow.
I'm not sure how you'll survive in the USA since apparently some dangerous, perhaps gun wielding, person is preventing you from seeing Star Trek for a year. After all you said you have to wait, which implies that you have no choice in matter. Now if you had said that you are choosing to wait because you don't want to pay to subscribe to CBS' online service, that would be one thing, but that's not what you said. You said you have to wait, so perhaps you should see what your legal remedies are agains
Re: (Score:2)
But alas, as I'm in the U.S. I will have to wait till it comes out a year later on US Netflix. I will survive..somehow.
I'm not sure how you'll survive in the USA since apparently some dangerous, perhaps gun wielding, person is preventing you from seeing Star Trek for a year. After all you said you have to wait, which implies that you have no choice in matter. Now if you had said that you are choosing to wait because you don't want to pay to subscribe to CBS' online service, that would be one thing, but that's not what you said. You said you have to wait, so perhaps you should see what your legal remedies are against these people who are preventing you from potentially subscribing to the service.
The OP used the term "have" correctly. To use it in the way you intend would be like saying nobody has to wait to go to the bathroom as they can always choose to go right where they are at. In short, it doesn't require one to be coerced with a gun until one has to wait for something. I bet you had to wait, just for this post and nobody was holding a gun on you to do so, or did you choose to wait?
Everyone but North America (Score:5, Insightful)
Stateside viewers will be able to stream the new show via CBS's own All Access digital subscription video-on-demand and live streaming service
That's a pretty credible attempt to unseat GoT as the most pirated TV show.
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, it's free for everyone who has a Netflix subscription except for those in the US? I'm not paying for another subscription; they're asking me to pirate it.
Its also free to anyone in the US who can receive CBS OTA, and available to anyone with cable.
Re: (Score:3)
"Its also free to anyone in the US who can receive CBS OTA, and available to anyone with cable."
No it's not. That is the whole problem. CBS is putting it ONLY on their stupid, proprietary streaming. Which means it won't work on TiVo, won't work on our smart TV's, won't work on our Linux computers, etc.
I mean F-that! I paid almost $1000 for a top-end TiVo and freaking $100 a month for cable with 99% channels I don't ever watch, AND I pay for a Netflix subscription. And they want me to do WHAT???
They are
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Oh who knows, maybe the article is wrong. Maybe CBS will change their minds and OTA it, maybe they can work out some other deal. It just certainly sounds like a really, really bad plan.
The Netflix deal for the entire world except USA and possibly Canada just seems like the ultimate slap in the face.
Re: (Score:2)
TiVo supports video on demand, encrypted channels (cable card), and SDV (tuning adapters)- I don't think a "PC" can do that, certainly not SDV when last I checked. Plus, that price was for lifetime service and also extended warranty, and with a REALLY nice RF remote and UI. Actually not an unreasonable for how much I use and enjoy it.
Re: (Score:2)
What is really needed is cable plans that allow selection of just the channels the person wants, or a Netflix that includes commercial-free programs from all the different channels and you can subscribe to what you want there, or have a micropayment system of paying for what you watch.
At that point the consumer gets what they want and companies are rewarded for what is actually being watched. It infuriates me that my money goes to companies like ESPN, BET, Discovery, etc when I have ZERO interest in their
Re: (Score:3)
It is not streaming only.
It will be streamed 1 day behind broadcast.
If you have CBS OTA (ex. via antenna), you can watch it there.
If you have CBS via a cable or sat provider, you can watch it there.
If you have CBS All Access (I'm not sure what all restrictions are there for that... I think you have to have an existing cable/sat account with it), you can stream from them in the US.
If you have Netflix and are not in the US or CA, you can stream it there.
IMO, I have no idea why they don't have all access open
Re: Everyone but North America (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Someone with a good monitor and good HD camcorder could record a telesync, which is a careful cam with line-dubbed audio. How is a telesync from an HD source not comparable to DVD quality?
Re: (Score:2)
I've wondered about intercepting the signal going to the LCD, but as a last resort your method should work good. You'd think subtlety on the highlights and shadows would be lost, but with the correct calibration and a decent modern sensor maybe the image could be captured raw and processed to DID-comparable quality. Or recorded in multiple passes with different light settings and likewise merged.
All the digital protections now going in to 4K could likewise lead to 'mere' HD rips of that content.
Re: Everyone but North America (Score:4, Informative)
A simple HDMI splitter also does the job along with an ElGato game capture device.
If you get the right kind of splitter on Amazon (B0089DSLMY), HDCP somehow gets lost along the way and you wind up with an unencrypted digital signal.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
The only OTA broadcast will be the PILOT. They've already said that all the other episodes will be streaming only.
I see that now, you are right. That sucks.
Re: (Score:2)
If the video publisher has chosen to require Protected Media Path, the recorder won't capture $#!+.
Why do us Canadians always get screwed? (Score:5, Funny)
"with Canadian streaming provisions yet to be announced".
What did we ever do to you Americans to always get screwed on streaming services? No SlingTV, no HBO Now, no Showtime, no Hulu, no CBS All Access, hell, we never even got Pandora, Netflix library is reduced, and now nobody can be bothered to even let us watch Startrek.
Did we not say sorry enough to you guys for something? Sorry.
You INVADED us! (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
I keep trying to take credit as a Canadian for that, but all of my American friends always insist it was the British who did it. Sorry either way, it's looking much nicer these days.
Re: (Score:1)
ooooh come back proud Canadians
To before you had TV
No hockey night in canada!
There was no CBC (oh my god)
In 1812 Maddison was mad
He was the president you know
well he thought he'd tell the British
Where they aught to go
He thought he'd invade canada
He thought that he was tough
Instead we went to washingon...
[chorus]
And burned down all his stuff!
And the white house burned burned burned down
And we're the ones that did it
It burned burned burned
while the president ran and cried
It burned burned burned down
And things
Re: (Score:1)
Controlled burns? (Score:4)
That isn't why we are upset, its the fact they forgot to burn down the the Senate building before they left.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, there is that whole burning down the White House thing...
Now you complain we burned down the White House. Then you'll have your next election. Then you'll be whining and complaining that we didn't come and burn down the White House. We just can't win.
Re: (Score:2)
"with Canadian streaming provisions yet to be announced".
What did we ever do to you Americans to always get screwed on streaming services?
I'm guessing it's one of two things. Either the CBC or the government is causing this (I have no idea exactly how TV in Canada works, so just a guess here) or you're being punished for supposedly having "weak" laws regarding intellectual property.
Re: (Score:2)
It really has to do with the owners licensing the broadcast rights to different people up here, and those people don't seem to interested in providing streaming services, and/or giving up streaming rights.
Re: (Score:3)
So, in other words, American studios are getting fucked over simply because they're not putting conditions like streaming into distribution contracts.
But yeah, it's like totally the viewer's fault if they don't want to buy an entire cable package to watch one fucking show.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
The premier episode will be on CTV, after which no more episodes will air.
No other episodes will be available OTA anywhere in Canada or anywhere else in the world. Bell Canada's Z (in French) and Space (in English) channels will carry them for cable/satellite, and the episodes will be available on Bell Canada's iCraveTV at some later date.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/television/new-star-trek-series-to-premiere-on-ctv-then-air-on-space-and-z/article30954899/
At least the fact they are airing in a non-
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm pretty sure you're wrong on both fronts, from what another poster put up, Bell Canada has licensed the show for their stations and included exclusive digital distribution rights in the contract. No CBC or government involvement at all, just plain old corporate greed and one-upmanship.
Re: (Score:2)
I expect it will be one of the Canadian streaming services, CraveTV or Shomi. It's also possible it will be broadcast on Space.
Re: (Score:1)
Confirmed by the Globe and Mail Today:
CTV to air the premiere episode.
Space and Z to air the rest of the episodes.
will be on CraveTV as well, along with all 727 episodes of the other series.
Re: (Score:2)
When it is going to be streaming only around the world, I'm surprised that they made an exception for Canada. I'm sure CraveTV could use a show to boost subscribers.
Re:Why do us Canadians always get screwed? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
justin bieber nuff said
Not nearly enough. Did you forget Celine Dion?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
It just happens that Canada is the closest neighbor to their headquarters.
Even here in the US they expect us to pay for YET ANOTHER pay service JUST to watch Star Trek.
It's amazing how much they keep pushing the public off the dock into the deep waters of the pirate bay while crying how awful it is that so many people are swimming in that same water.
Re: (Score:2)
Here's what we did, we created the protectionist CRTC, that's what we did. Plus we annoyingly decided to be a separate country.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
>"the show will be broadcast on cbs there only talking streaming."
Not in the USA it won't. Why do you think everyone is upset? No OTA, no Netflex, and no Cable. It is pay up for their proprietary streaming crap that doesn't work with ANYTHING most of us own.
Re: (Score:2)
>What did we ever do to you Americans
Celine Dion and Justin Bieber.
>Did we not say sorry enough to you guys for something? Sorry.
It's going to take a LOT more sorry's to make up for that. Maybe a few more Bryan Adamses and you can start calling it even.
Re: Why do us Canadians always get screwed? (Score:3)
Stargate SG1 seems a fair trade for this yet unseen new Trek show.
As a Canadian (Score:2)
Big ST fan here (Score:5, Interesting)
I am a big ST fan and while TNG is still my favorite I even like the reboot movies (yes they are not "Trek" in the traditional sense, but the actors & dialogue are good entertainment). So I was quite happy to hear about a new series... Then they published the fan film guidelines and suddenly it all turned sour for me. Sure, I always knew Paramount/CBS are doing it for the money, but performing what is analogous to kicking their fans in the face? And I was never a big fan of fan-made films, but I always took it for granted that they added value to ST not take away from it...
Nope, the way I feel right now I'll just re-watch my already paid-for TNG, TOS etc disks and hope someone else will make some decent non-ST sci-fi.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, the fan film guidelines will put a BIG dent in some of the best fan films out there. I have been watching Star Trek Continues, and they have very good TOS episodes, which will not be possible under the new guidelines (50-minute (or there-about) episodes). This will be a loss for the ST community.
Re:Big ST fan here (Score:5, Insightful)
Star Trek Continues (fan work) is some of the best Trek ever made. Better than 95% of everything official, easily. I think they are worried that fans are doing a better job than they are.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Big ST fan here (Score:2)
No intention to subscribe for one show (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:No intention to subscribe for one show (Score:5, Interesting)
Well we also had such flops like.
The Motion Picture,
The Search for Spock
The Final Frontier
Voyager
Generations
Insurrection
Nemesis
Enterprise
Trek has been in a steady decline for a while.
The problem is it was a show for the 1960's trying to reboot it for the new generation while keeping its nostalgic charm is getting harder and harder.
The successes in the list.
Wrath of Kahn - Allowed a nostalgic response to an existing story, added with the character development of an older Kirk trying to retire.
The Voyage Home - Wasn't a Star Trek movie, but a Romance Comedy with Star Trek Characters.
The Undiscovered country - once again playing on the older Kirk who was to retire.
First Contact - While popular at the time, I don't feel it will hold up. However that was more of an action flick than star trek.
For the shows.
TNG in essence ignored the TOS for most of the plots and created a show independant.
The same with DS9 very different.
Voyager and Enterprise failed because they tried to remake the TOS and TNG with different characters with a decade apart.
Re: (Score:1)
I found all the movies you list to be quite entertaining. If they flopped at the box office, that may be another matter, but the movies themselves I thought to be quite interesting.
Re:No intention to subscribe for one show (Score:5, Insightful)
I actually enjoy The Motion Picture now. The problem is that if you watch TOS and then jump to TMP, it's pretty jarring. Still, it's an exposition-heavy film that seems more akin to 2001 than to TOS.
Wrath of Khan is obviously the best, but TMP isn't bad at all.
Re: (Score:2)
Voyager failed because the writers could never really decide what it was about at all. Between that lack of focus, the worst excesses of the TNG world, and a lot of characters no one could give a damn about it, it never clicked.
Enterprise failed precisely because it didn't try to replicate TOS at all. Well, I hear the final season was alright, but by that point I'd lost all interest and really couldn't be bothered even now to check it out. Enterprise could have been a very interesting show, and the few epis
Re: (Score:2)
Enterprise: Vulcans as bitchy hypocrites didn't help the show either.
Re: (Score:2)
About where I lost all desire to watch any more episodes was when it was "revealed" (retconned) that all the spiritualistic and telepathic Vulcans were some sort of cult a century before TOS. It was absurd to imagine that by the TOS period, a culture of ritualized logic had arisen from a small rump of what would have been in the Enterprise era a pack of hippy kooks was absurd. I'm thinking about the importance of the High Priestess T'Pau in TOS and her successors in the later ST shows and films and just can
Re: (Score:3)
Both Voyager and Enterprise share one other thing in common, they were largely run by two Paramount executives Rick Berman and Brannon Braga [stardestroyer.net]. Not even Manny Coto [wikipedia.org]'s surprising good final season of Enterprise could pull the show out of the nosedive that Berman and Braga had put it into.
Personally Enterprise failed because it got everything wrong. Wrong tone, wrong characters, wrong plots, wrong settings, wrong acting, wrong characterization, wrong logic, wrong common sense.
My personal pet peeve is episode
No loss there. (Score:1)
Back to pirating (Score:1)
All Access == Pay TV == Nonstarter (Score:1)
After already shelling out about $300 to my cable company for TV, many premium channels, internet access, and telephone service, I draw the line. Either they get it on my cable for no extra charge, or they can forget it. They don't have anything, nor will they, that I'm going send any additional $$$ anywhere for. This is getting ridiculous.
CBS Fail. (Score:3)
Let's see how long that lasts.
Re: (Score:2)
You are choosing to NOT be on Netflix (US/Canada)|Hulu|Amazon|YouTube RED...hmmm yeah Let's see how long that lasts.
Maybe longer than you realize. CBS has never been part of Hulu and I think no part of those other services either. At present they believe that they can make more money by getting people to pay for their own streaming service which they don't have to share with anybody else. We'll see how that works with Star Trek.
We are not all back waters (Score:2)
and at one stroke eliminates the typical years of delay that occur when a U.S. program seeks foreign audiences.
Weeks, and months, but seldom is it years, and, if it is, this is likely because the Networks here did not see a potential audience for it.
I can only speak for New Zealand, We receive a high amount of out programming the same week and the same day as the U.S/U.K (especially for the most popular shows).
If not that quick, many others are being played before the series has run its course in the U.S.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Nope, its not going to be on the air, only on internet for a price. OBTW, its still a "FU" for the price - I'm not paying.
Re: (Score:2)
Or, more likely, the first episode will be watched by hundreds of thousands of Canadians roughly 30 to 45 minutes after the premier on TV via Bittorrent.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, ST was never the same since it started showing equality among the races! Curse you, you hippy bastard Roddenberry!
Re: Don't care (Score:2)
Nihilism is not a color.
Re: (Score:2)
Ah, I do feel sorry for you and your obsessive hatred of homosexuals. Well, look at it this way, you'll be dead in a few decades, and they won't bother you with their existence any more.
In the meantime, I recommend watching reruns of 1950s and 1960s television shows, you know, where people do the proper thing and have sex via two beds separated by three feet and no one ever has an attraction to someone of their gender. You're clearly too immature and reactionary to deal with the real world, so I recommend y
Re: Don't care (Score:2)
You mean, back when creating the next generation of mankind was considered to have social value?
When marriage was a mechanism by which society supported this valuable task?
Before the economic support of marriage became something people are simply entitled to?
Before the important role of wives and mothers was completely devalued, and treated as offering no more social value than a young man who takes it up the bum?
You know what? I think I will.
Re: (Score:2)
Here's a tip. Gays can have children, and they can even raise them.
The rest is just fevered nonsense. Homosexuals at best represent 10% of the population, so they're not a threat to the future. You're just looking for reasons to support your hatred.
Re: (Score:2)
>What did we ever do to you American
And they often do it to a larger extent. I have a lesbian friend who donates eggs four times a year. She has well over 19 biological children by now.
Re: (Score:2)
You mean, back when creating the next generation of mankind was considered to have social value?
No, in the 1970's, there was neo-Malthusianism which worried about overpopulation. Creating too many of the next generation was a worry and all sorts of crazy people had crazy ideas about how to fix it. Except that there's no need. Educating women and developing the nation staves off the birth rates and all the developed nations without sizable immigration now actually have a worry about declining population.
When marriage was a mechanism by which society supported this valuable task?
That's still in effect. A lot of people still marry and have kids.
And the divorce rat [google.com]
Re: Don't care (Score:2)
Insult me all you want. I'm not going to change, except inasmuch as I become more hostile from being instigated.
Self serving sophist.
Re: (Score:2)
Ask for details instead of vague hate-mongering and I typically get two things: They run away like this coward, or they dive off the deep end of crazy.
"It's all the GAYS fault!"
"What's the gay's fault?"
*poof gone*
And very occasionally I get an insightful critic. I've come to accept that treating women like real people and equals is the cause for the raise in divorces. And this is a consequence of the sexual revolution and hippies and women's rights movement. A "casulty" would be an accurate description. An
Re: Don't care (Score:2)
Why are you people wasting mod points on a statement of personal intent, and treating it like something subject to debate?
Try just, expressing your own position.
Re: Don't care (Score:1)
Funny, MENSA doesn't think so.
Re: (Score:2)
Well now you're definitely an idiot for making an appeal to THAT particular authority.
Re: Don't care (Score:2)
I don't know you any better than you know me, so, I don't know if you're an idiot.
But the fact that you're comfortable making assertions from a position of ignorance certainly implies it...
Re: (Score:2)
An organisation who calls themselves geniusses yet spend their time in an organisation of self proclaimed geniusses.
Actual geniusses don't join MENSA - they are too busy trying to make the world a better place. They are in research laboratories painstakingly trying to unravel the mysteries of the universe, working on vaccines for deadly diseases, finding ways get more energy out of cleaner technologies, digging through miles of dirt to learn more about our ancient ancestors and their cousins and the history
Re: Don't care (Score:2)
You are irrelevant
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That's OK, there are better sci-fi out there anyways to watch in the meantime:
* Battlestar Galactica (2004)
* Continuum
* Dark Matter
* Fringe
* Futurama
* Lost
* Red Dwarf