Netflix and Amazon Are Struggling To Win Over the World's Second-Largest Internet Market (cnbc.com) 29
An anonymous reader shares a report: As Netflix and Amazon search for new users abroad, they are increasingly looking to India as a big market. Once crippled by poor internet infrastructure and low household income, the world's second-largest internet market has exhibited tremendous potential in the recent years. It's proving, however, to be a tough nut to crack for the American streaming leaders.
Leading the pack in the nation is Hotstar. Owned by Star India, which is controlled by Twenty-First Century Fox, Hotstar had about 70 percent of the on-demand local streaming services market earlier this year, according to estimates by research firm Jana. The three-and-a-half-year-old service has 150 million monthly active users, CEO Ajit Mohan told CNBC in an interview. Netflix, by contrast, has fewer than one million subscribers in the country, according to industry estimates. Once considered a luxury, an increasingly growing number of Indians are giving online streaming services a try. Companies have taken notice: More than 35 streaming services have launched or expanded their businesses in India in the last three and a half years, with many more planning to enter Bollywood soon. [...] Analysts say sporting events and local content are proving crucial in bringing new users to video platforms and then keeping them online, two areas where international giants are struggling. Hotstar, which offers much of its content to users at no charge (instead relying on ads to make revenue), charges $3 for its premium offering. In contrast, Netflix charges Indians about $8 a month.
Sports streaming in particular is helping local firms gain new users, the report said. You might remember Hotstar, which entered the US and Canada markets, set a new global concurrent record in late April, and now it turns out SonyLiv is getting more concurrent viewers to the FIFA World Cup in India than Fox Sports is generating on its digital platform in the US.
Leading the pack in the nation is Hotstar. Owned by Star India, which is controlled by Twenty-First Century Fox, Hotstar had about 70 percent of the on-demand local streaming services market earlier this year, according to estimates by research firm Jana. The three-and-a-half-year-old service has 150 million monthly active users, CEO Ajit Mohan told CNBC in an interview. Netflix, by contrast, has fewer than one million subscribers in the country, according to industry estimates. Once considered a luxury, an increasingly growing number of Indians are giving online streaming services a try. Companies have taken notice: More than 35 streaming services have launched or expanded their businesses in India in the last three and a half years, with many more planning to enter Bollywood soon. [...] Analysts say sporting events and local content are proving crucial in bringing new users to video platforms and then keeping them online, two areas where international giants are struggling. Hotstar, which offers much of its content to users at no charge (instead relying on ads to make revenue), charges $3 for its premium offering. In contrast, Netflix charges Indians about $8 a month.
Sports streaming in particular is helping local firms gain new users, the report said. You might remember Hotstar, which entered the US and Canada markets, set a new global concurrent record in late April, and now it turns out SonyLiv is getting more concurrent viewers to the FIFA World Cup in India than Fox Sports is generating on its digital platform in the US.
Re: (Score:1)
Designated shitting streams! ...oh wait, that'd be the Ganges.
Look at what sells now (Score:2)
1. Find the experts who can create the same content, scripts, movies, series, plots, musicals, comedies, thrillers, political dramas.
Offer local experts with good ideas for their own market money to create content.
When an idea sells, offer more money for the next great idea.
2. Find the actors who are photogenic and who can make the above plots, ideas sell.
Glamour and prettiness with the ability to act.
3. Profit.
Local people with good
Re: (Score:2)
That plan doesn't make sense. They are selling an all you can stream service. And, there are probably only 1 orr 2 winners in India. So, spending on being 2nd, not 3rd, or 1st, not 2nd is worth far more than the additional revenue that it brings in.
Which is to say, shotgun money (since both have nigh-infinite cash) at anything that sounds interested, and then use metrics to renew shows or not.
Re: (Score:1)
Translated US SJW series might not sell well outside the USA.
Different markets may have different ideas as to what a plot is and what kind of plot arc sells.
What is funny. Who is photogenic. Local censorship laws. Local politics and what topics are not allowed.
What topics really sell and make millions over decades.
Buying decades of low cost older local content is not going to sell as local people have see
Re: (Score:2)
But it does make a lot of sense.
The entire obstacle of Netflix or Amazon is that people need to invest into a streaming device, a audio/video setup, find out about Netflix/Amazon, and then sign a subscription.
From what I remember in Scandinavia, as Netflix penetrated the marked, it was of big importance to have shows that already went on TV, and also have access to popular shows that where hard to find on DVD at the local consumer electrical retailer. So there was some 90s Disney cartoon series, X-Files, St
Re: (Score:2)
Netflix didn't do that at the start, they licensed a bunch of existing content. I don't know if they intended to make their own shows from the start, it seems like they decided they needed to do that because the incumbent content owners started making their own streaming platforms and wouldn't license to Netflix as much anymore.
USA FTW anyway (Score:2)
So what - it's two American companies competing with a third American company. No matter what, the USA seems to be winning.