IAU Ad Hoc Committee Publishes Revised Set of Definitions For SETI Terms (arxiv.org) 28
RockDoctor writes: An ad hoc committee of the International Astronomical Union has been working for 5 months on revisions and clarifications to the definitions of various terms used in technical and popular discussions of SETI -- the Search For Extraterrestrial Intelligence. They've published their draft report.
The terms of reference -- to account for existing popular and technical uses of the terms -- should mean that no major changes in usage occur, but interesting points do emerge from the discussion paper. For example, in discussing the term "extraterrestrial," their proposed definition ("shorthand for life or technology not originating recently on Earth") includes cover for possibilities such as "panspermia" which may be popular in "popular science," but certainly are not popular in the technical discussions. They go on to discuss that "by this definition, life on another planet with a common origin to Earth life but which diverged billions of years ago would be extraterrestrial, but Earth life accidentally brought to Mars on a human-built lander would not." Waiting for the invasion of the pedants, clutching their feet in their hands.
The terms of reference -- to account for existing popular and technical uses of the terms -- should mean that no major changes in usage occur, but interesting points do emerge from the discussion paper. For example, in discussing the term "extraterrestrial," their proposed definition ("shorthand for life or technology not originating recently on Earth") includes cover for possibilities such as "panspermia" which may be popular in "popular science," but certainly are not popular in the technical discussions. They go on to discuss that "by this definition, life on another planet with a common origin to Earth life but which diverged billions of years ago would be extraterrestrial, but Earth life accidentally brought to Mars on a human-built lander would not." Waiting for the invasion of the pedants, clutching their feet in their hands.
O-key (Score:2)
”Waiting for the invasion of the pedants, clutching their feet in their hands.”
I suspect they’re all part of the committee already.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Hmmm (Score:2)
Unclear definition of recent. Recent as in X years or recent as in common phylum?
I'd prefer ETL (extra-terrestrial life) - which telescopes can now detect - to be defined and then have layers on that for various levels of complexity. Maybe even start with NTL (non-terrestrial life). Granularity allows distinction and analysis.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
And don't say "sperm", it triggers me.
Re: (Score:2)
You're trying to be funny, but fail miserably. Don't try to riff off issues you don't comprehend by playing to words you don't understand.
Simple Definition (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Life on a planet other than Earth which did not get there as a result of human activity.
Good defiinition, but unless you're extraterrestrial I'm pretty sure you didn't type that while clutching your feet in your hands.
Re: (Score:2)
I like that one, but you could still get some odd edge case where a recent impact splashes life-bearing rocks to the Moon or Mars.
Not that I can think of any big enough to have done that recently. Even the Canyon Diablo (Meteor Crater, Arizona) impact, about 40,000 years ago, probably wasn't big enough.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I like that one, but you could still get some odd edge case where a recent impact splashes life-bearing rocks to the Moon or Mars.
Actually, that is what I really did not understand about the lengthy definition. If such an impact happened "recently" then it has almost certainly happened before and probably lots of times. If so then you really have no idea where life originated and so the only definition that makes any sense is based on planet of residency because that's all you can determine.
NERDS! (Score:2)
in discussing the role of "Han" their proposed definition ("shorthand for a character created by George Lucus") includes cover for having "shot second" which may be popular in "popular science-fiction," but is certainly not popular in technical discussions.
NERDS! [imgur.com] ;)
Hmm, is 65 mya "recent"? (Score:2)
They go on to discuss that "by this definition, life on another planet with a common origin to Earth life but which diverged billions of years ago would be extraterrestrial,
Interesting. My T-Space books and stories (currently the Alpha Centaur trilogy and several others, more to come) posit terraformed planets whose life diverged about 65 million years ago (post Cretaceous). I wonder if under this definition that would be considered extraterrestrial. (I generally don't -- but I haven't gotten to the real
Re: (Score:2)
Argh. Alpha Centauri, not Alpha Centaur. I even previewed. :(
Re: (Score:2)
Is there even any particular reason it would need to be fertile? There's an awful lot of chemovore bacteria living deep inside rocks after all, that might not care where the meteor buried itself so long as the ambient temperature was tolerable and the atmosphere non-toxic enough to allow them to migrate to the local rocks. And once you have life of some sort, evolution will bring it to the surface eventually if it's even remotely feasible - there's all that space and energy-gradient available with no comp
Re: (Score:2)
A bacterial spore splashed out last year or a billion years ago would be pretty unlikely to then independently invent the mechanisms and chemistry of the eukaryotic cell which is used by all multicellular organisms. So, just at the level of biochemistry, long before you get to trying
Re: (Score:2)
Seti vs crypto mining (Score:2)
I wonder what would forward the search for intelligent extraterrestrial life more, using SETI to analyze radio telescope data or using that compute power to mine crypto-currency and giving that money to researchers?
Re: (Score:2)