Netflix is Developing a Slate of Specials That Will Let Viewers Choose the Next Storyline in a TV Episode or Movie, Report Says (bloomberg.com) 125
Netflix is about to let you decide how your favorite show will end, Bloomberg reported Monday. From the report: The streaming service is developing a slate of specials that will let viewers choose the next storyline in a TV episode or movie, according to people familiar with the matter. The company expects to release the first of these projects before the end of this year, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the plans are still private.
Viewers will get to choose their own storylines in one episode of the upcoming season of "Black Mirror," the Emmy-winning science-fiction anthology series. The show is famous for exploring the social implications of technology, including an episode where humans jockey to receive higher ratings from their peers. The fifth season of the show is expected to be released in December.
The foray into choose-your-own-adventure programming represents a big bet on a nascent form of entertainment known as interactive TV. As Netflix expands around the world, it's looking for new ways to lure customers. By blending elements of video games with traditional television, the company could create a formula that can be applied to any number of series.
Viewers will get to choose their own storylines in one episode of the upcoming season of "Black Mirror," the Emmy-winning science-fiction anthology series. The show is famous for exploring the social implications of technology, including an episode where humans jockey to receive higher ratings from their peers. The fifth season of the show is expected to be released in December.
The foray into choose-your-own-adventure programming represents a big bet on a nascent form of entertainment known as interactive TV. As Netflix expands around the world, it's looking for new ways to lure customers. By blending elements of video games with traditional television, the company could create a formula that can be applied to any number of series.
All I can say is (Score:2)
"Twitch plays Pokemon" comes to TV.
Re:All I can say is (Score:4, Interesting)
This will be more "we filmed 3 endings", I expect. People's narrative choices tend to follow the 80/20 rule, so 3 endings will get you 99% of the audience. The exception to that is love triagles (or love dodecahedrons [tvtropes.org]) where you can get a more even spread. I suspect romances will be the focus if this takes off, not "choose your own adventure".
Re:All I can say is (Score:4, Interesting)
I'm reminded of the 1961 film "Mr. Sardonicus", where the producer William Castle promised two endings. Supposedly, the audience could vote to punish the villain at the end or spare him. Of course, the audience always voted to punish him. Good thing too, because Mr. Castle, being an astute observer of human nature, only actually made the "punish the villain" ending.
Re: (Score:2)
Most of the Black Mirror episodes haven't really been about romance. These are much more of a Twilight Zone feel with a technology or social media angle.
Reading adventure... (Score:2)
Turn to page 12. Turn to page 49. Turn to page 26. Turn to page 71. You are slayed by...
Re: (Score:2)
How do I get to the ending where the actors from Stranger Things are freed from their stage parents and get to live normal lives?
Haven't they learned anything? (Score:5, Insightful)
Haven't they learned anything from cases such as Boaty-McBoatface, Taylor Swifts Biggest Fan,or sending her to a school for the deaf, or sending Pitbull to Alaska
Leaving the choice up to the Internet, or even just Netflix subscribers isn't going to result in the best storylines, or even the storylines that necessarily reflect what actual people want to see.
Re: (Score:2)
My favorite was the new Mountain Dew flavor called Hitler Did Nothing Wrong.
Re: (Score:2)
https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/i... [kym-cdn.com]
Re: (Score:1)
This could actually lead to better writing, if the show writers had any capability of following logic cues. Unfortunately, at this point, most TV writers can't even follow their own plots. We really don't need to be handing them something as complicated as "viewer choice" to try and plot off of.
Re: (Score:3)
Worked fine for Sharknado (a series of movies that could be called stupid... then again... I like stupid B-movies)
Re: (Score:3)
Personally, I'd rather see a "kill a character" vote
Worked for removing the Jason Todd Robin from the Batman comics. DC offered a poll (with a 1-900 number) in 1988 to see if that particular robin should be killed, and the result was overwhelmingly for death. He stayed dead for quite a long time, too (forever, by comic book standards, it used to be said he was one of two characters who would actually stay dead, but they eventually brought him back).
Re: (Score:2)
Personally, I'd rather see a "kill a character" vote
Worked for removing the Jason Todd Robin from the Batman comics. DC offered a poll (with a 1-900 number) in 1988 to see if that particular robin should be killed, and the result was overwhelmingly for death. He stayed dead for quite a long time, too (forever, by comic book standards, it used to be said he was one of two characters who would actually stay dead, but they eventually brought him back).
Didn't they bring back the other one too?
Re: (Score:3)
Haven't they learned anything from cases such as Boaty-McBoatface, Taylor Swifts Biggest Fan,or sending her to a school for the deaf, or sending Pitbull to Alaska
Leaving the choice up to the Internet, or even just Netflix subscribers isn't going to result in the best storylines, or even the storylines that necessarily reflect what actual people want to see.
Sounds like it's Choose Your Own Adventure style ... the storylines and branches should already be created by the writers?
Re:Haven't they learned anything? (Score:5, Insightful)
Give people a pre defined list of options and let them choose from. Have contingency plans for every option they can choose.
This principle has been working for Choose Your Own Adventure books and video games since the 80's.
Re: (Score:2)
ecause murder and war about differences in opinion over entertainment media have been such huge historical issues in the past...
Depends on how one looks at religion.
Re: (Score:2)
Lots of people claim "Jedi" as their religion. I know people who follow the sorta-religion started by Stranger in a Strange Land (much to Heinlein's horror). The Mormons' holy book pretty much admits Joseph Smith was just making stuff up (not that it calls attention to it).
People are just looking for a value structure that seems to work for them. Doesn't matter at first whether it claims to be the One True Faith. Organizations tend to go bad over time though.
Re: (Score:3)
Give people a pre defined list of options and let them choose from. Have contingency plans for every option they can choose.
Can we have at least ONE /. story that doesn't descend into politics?
Re:Haven't they learned anything? (Score:5, Funny)
No. VI forever!
Re: (Score:3)
I never understood why people would want to use a text editor called "six".
Re: (Score:2)
Malcom Two? What a ridiculous name.
Re: (Score:3)
After all the principle of letting people choose from limited options isn't inherently tied to politics and can be found in many technical fields as well.
I immediately thought of video games as a practical application of these principles. A form of media which is based upon the premise that players have a set of pre-defined choices. Some games give more choices and others. Some games feature simulations that allow players to do a lot of things, that can also have
Re: (Score:2)
Of course, the "choose your route" method can flub even in videogames. Mass Effect 3 was an instructive example of how the illusion of choice in videogames collided head-on with reality, not to mention a few bad design & storytelling decisions. The entirety of all the difficult choices and decisions made along the way in three games ended up as a rather anemic A/B/C choice.
Re: (Score:2)
From a story telling perspective Mass Effect 3 made a faux pas by basically disconnecting the ending from all the plot that was going on before. I mean even if you want a twist ending, that surprises everyone, you have to craft it in a way that makes it arise logically from everything that happened before that, even though they may not have paid attention to all the little breadcrumbs that you left for them while you were going. If your ending doesn't follo
Re: (Score:2)
Givee people a pre defined list of options and let them choose from. Have contingency plans for every option they can choose.
Optimistically, there would be a few filmed endings, and you could watch whichever took your fancy. Cynically, this is the new reality TV, and there won't even be writers.
Re: (Score:2)
In my experience with Choose Your Own Adventure books, the contingency for every option I chose was a gruesome death. So, following that model, they could prepare for many contingencies with just one plan!
Depends (Score:2)
Re:Haven't they learned anything? (Score:5, Informative)
Leaving the choice up to the Internet, or even just Netflix subscribers isn't going to result in the best storylines, or even the storylines that necessarily reflect what actual people want to see.
My favorite example of this is Imgur Let's play: Top comment decides what action Luke does next [imgur.com]
Re: (Score:2)
* or equivalent
Re: (Score:2)
While I do see your point in what the "hive mind" tried to do there, it actually turned into something hilarious. It is so retarded and funny at the same time because the writer salvaged what they tried to destroy.
Obviously this would never work on a large scale, with commercial interests calling the shots, but still...
Re: (Score:2)
Oh my, this is fun. Thanks for sharing!
Re: (Score:2)
This sounds like a “choose your own adventure” plot selection, akin to what was done with Mosaic [wikipedia.org], rather than the “viewer’s choice” style plot selection you seem to be thinking of. As such, your concern is rather moot, since it’s each person making a personal choice about how to view the story.
Netflix is realizing that as a company that owns its own content delivery clients, they’re in an ideal position to try to leverage this sort of content. In contrast, HBO had t
Re: (Score:2)
Haven't they learned anything from cases such as Boaty-McBoatface, Taylor Swifts Biggest Fan,or sending her to a school for the deaf, or sending Pitbull to Alaska
Leaving the choice up to the Internet, or even just Netflix subscribers isn't going to result in the best storylines, or even the storylines that necessarily reflect what actual people want to see.
I agree, they will present a limited number of choices scripted in advance, with viewers voting on which one to follow. It is intended to be a hook to draw viewers in, although the losing voters may lose interest as well. Personally, I refer a story to be well written and engaging, and not merely another version of Colossal Cave.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, but it could still be incredibly entertaining.
Re: (Score:2)
No, it will result in storylines Netflix subscribers want to see.
This is an important point - Netflix is not creating content randomly - they are creating content that appeals to their subscribers. Doing this they hope to retain subscribers to their service, like other subscription TV channels like HBO do.
This it
Everybody dies. (Score:2)
Or how about a character break character while filming and accuse someone of doing something. (It's got to be a female though, since they don't lie.)
And then we could follow the cast and crew spread to the winds while the accused producer loses everything and ends up on the street, disheveled and homeless.
Re: (Score:2)
how about a character break character while filming and accuse someone of doing something. (It's got to be a female though, since they don't lie.)
And then we could follow the cast and crew spread to the winds while the accused producer loses everything and ends up on the street, disheveled and homeless.
Just so you know, there's an existing genre of "drama breaks out of character into conflict between actors, and we follow both sets of events". It's called "modern professional wrestling".
"Black Mirror" is not a "series" (or "TV show") (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
So by this weird logic "The Twilight Zone" wasn't a TV series?
Re: (Score:2)
By that definition probably rather an "Anthology".
Re: (Score:1)
No, pretty much everyone just calls it a TV series.
Re: (Score:2)
as pretty much everyone calls an accumulator a battery.
I mean that's absolutely OK if you define a series as something that is on TV every week.
Re: (Score:1)
Sure, but being a TV series does not mean it has to be a serialized story. A TV series can also be episodic. This is not anything new or groundbreaking. Episodic TV series have been a thing for many decades.
Re: (Score:2)
And as pretty much everyone calls it a battery instead of a cell.
Re: (Score:2)
So by this weird logic "The Twilight Zone" wasn't a TV series?
Ooooh spooky twist there.
Re: (Score:2)
It's an anthology series [wikipedia.org]. And, if you watch through the end of series four, you'll discover that many of the episodes actually are in an interconnected world, with previous characters or events being referenced in at least one later episode [wikipedia.org].
Re: "Black Mirror" is not a "series" (or "TV show" (Score:1)
it's very true (a didn't know the concept)
Yeah, everything old is new again. (Score:2)
Didn't someone try that sort of thing with DVDs many years ago? How'd that work out?
Re: (Score:1)
Swimmingly, of course. Hehe...
Re: (Score:2)
Shit, when I was a kid in the 80s, and cable companies realized they could have hundreds of channels, this is one of the things they considered doing. "To have KITT rescue Michael, go to channel 500. To have KITT rescue the hostage, go to channel 501."
By the way, hurry up and bring back Captain Power.
Re: (Score:3)
Didn't someone try that sort of thing with DVDs many years ago? How'd that work out?
Depended on which choices you made
Re: (Score:2)
I chose VHS, you insensitive clod!
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe in the USA. I'm Canadian and I'm really fucking sick of all the useless violence and deaths.
Re: (Score:2)
People want car chases, guns guns guns, nudity, and no story.
Judging by novel sales [wikipedia.org], what people what most is a good mystery, followed by romance. Adventure is a distant third, followed by children's stories.
Re: (Score:2)
Sky RedButton (Score:2)
Didn't Sky already do this in Britain? They even had a Doctor Who special that let you use Sky RedButton to point out stuff to the Doctor during the episode, and if you missed the cues, the scene unfolded differently (but did not affect the overall plot).
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds like dragon's lair with out the death if you miss the button.
Re: (Score:2)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:3)
Why doesn't Netflix go back to what was working? This internal created programing is mostly crap, can't imagine its cheaper then buying really good produced shows and movies. Amazon has basically done the same thing, spending a ton of money on internal productions. Both need to go back to being a content streamer not a production house making failed original content.
Due to:
1) Price gouging by content owners
2) Content owners pulling their content and making competing services
It is probably not only a great deal safer in the long run, but probably cheaper in both the short and long-term to make their own content
Not to mention
3) different constraints on streaming vs broadcast
As this lets them make episodes that do not need to exactly match the current broadcast episode length, or even the length of previous episodes for the same series.
(including explicit material for som
Could be disapointing for the viewer (Score:5, Interesting)
If you are presented with 5 different ways a story ends, people would want to know how it really ends or which one is correct.
Those "choose your adventure" books always had one real ending (killing the princess and rescue the dragon.. whatever.. there's a reason why they work well with plain vanilla fantasy) and you had to get to that ending.
Re: (Score:1)
While I'd love it if they would go ahead and make the one path you chose become the one and only path you can see, if they don't do that, then you could do like you used to with those books and re-watch until you get the ending you want.
Re: (Score:2)
killing the princess and rescue the dragon
Is that from the Bowsette meme that's been going around? Sounds like an interesting plot twist actually.
Re: (Score:2)
Or it'll be like watching Clue (1985). You'll want to see all the endings.
Re: (Score:2)
That gives me the shits about people. People refuse to accept their own interpretation and insist on knowing what the "true" ending means, what the "lore" is.
It ruins some otherwise classic endings, like the ending of Inception, was he dreaming, was he awake, does it matter? I HAVE TO KNOW WHAT THE DIRECTOR WAS THINKING!
Re: (Score:3)
On the contrary, it would allow for story paths for the lowest common denominator AND story paths for the rest of us.
Netflix is available world-wide, so the lowest common denominator story path would be zero nudity, 200% guns, 300% car chases and 400% gruesome deaths for the USA while the rest of the planet could watch something with tasteful nudity, 1000% less violence and an ending that actually makes sense.
Re: (Score:2)
You know nothing about the USA. We actually love watching nudity. We just don't want other Americans to see nudity. Those people can't control themselves.
Recipes (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Shows like Game of Thrones.....have a distinct identity ; none of their creators would let anyone decide the next storyline.
You do realize the show GoT outpaced the books long enough ago that yes, the show actually has been deciding it's storyline. Of course, they did get buy-in from GRR Martin, but they have said that the show storyline could and probably would differ from the book storyline.
Roman Gladiators? (Score:1)
Been done before, everyone in the audience, THUMBS DOWN.
Re: (Score:2)
That could be the basic ending of the branches.
Another idea would be to follow the story on one side instead of the other. See the bad guys point of view, etc.
It's inevitable (Score:2)
All roads lead to bigotry, scatological humor, and sex.
Because taken as a whole, the Internet is a 12-year-old boy who has no filters, wants to see boobies, and thinks fart jokes are hilarious.
Ob futurama (Score:3)
There already is an interactive story medium. (Score:2)
It's called "gaming", and its bound to do it better than anything like this can.
Somehow I doubt any basically linear form like a movie or a TV show or a novel can offer enough interactivity to matter without undermining the uniquely valuable aspects of traditional storytelling. But it's not surprising that people -- corporate people -- keep trying.
Movies and special TV shows are massive collective undertakings which take immense logistical ingenuity and financial risk just to bring to the screen. Just sit
Re: (Score:2)
Philips CD-i brought interactive videos to the masses in the 1990's. And our reaction was: meh.
Sega CD games like Night Trap were novel in that it's terribleness at least could be interpreted as an amusing cult movie / video game.
(in the 80's there were several arcade systems that were basically interactive videos - Sega's Astro Belt, Cinematronic's Dragon's Lair & Space Ace, Stern Pinball's Cliff Hanger. These aged better than CD-i, probably because of their significantly higher production values)
Letting the mob write Netflix's series... (Score:2)
Can't be worse than letting Adam Sandler write a series.
Nascent form of entertainment? (Score:2)