Samsung is Loading McAfee Antivirus Software On Smart TVs (techspot.com) 160
Samsung is adding bloatware to its 2019 TVs because McAfee is paying them to do so. From a report: There is arguably no reason at all for Samsung to offer a third-party antivirus software for an operating system that is developed in house. Partnering with software vendors is fairly common practice for large hardware manufacturers. Laptop makers frequently preinstall bloatware in return for some sizable payouts and smartphone OEMs are no different. Samsung is now installing McAfee antivirus software on its 2019 TV lineup.
Samsung is claiming something to the effect of wanting to protect users from malware. On the surface that makes sense, but Samsung is running its very own Tizen OS on all of its TVs. Instead of adding more junk to a TV, why not just improve the OS? The answer though is very self explanatory. Samsung would not receive a payout from McAfee if it did not install the unneeded software.
Samsung is claiming something to the effect of wanting to protect users from malware. On the surface that makes sense, but Samsung is running its very own Tizen OS on all of its TVs. Instead of adding more junk to a TV, why not just improve the OS? The answer though is very self explanatory. Samsung would not receive a payout from McAfee if it did not install the unneeded software.
hold on.. (Score:5, Funny)
Re: hold on.. (Score:2, Funny)
You get the award for not rtfa AND not rtfs.
Re: (Score:1)
Raise the price, please (Score:3)
The proles have arrived (Score:3, Insightful)
There was a golden age of tech (and of computing in particular), when only the intelligent, self-sufficient, industrious, unabashedly eccentric types were interested in it.
Then, gaming made tech fun.
Then, Apple made tech cool.
Then, Android made tech ubiquitous.
Now, tech is firmly in the sticky, unwashed hands of the proletariat, and it's time to move on to more secluded grounds. See you there!
Re: (Score:3)
Let them have their locked-in TVs and smartphones. It's not like we have to use them, and if it makes them happy, at least they don't stumble into our turfs.
Re: (Score:2)
No, but it is pretty trivial to lobotomize them.
Re: (Score:2)
"Error 4001: Please contact support."
It's 2019 and we are infatuated with software/hardware that must ask permission to even turn on. Which means you're not the owner of your own property.
Re: (Score:2)
As long as I have it in my possession, I can manipulate it to do my bidding. It might not be easy for everyone, but that doesn't mean that I cannot do it.
Re: (Score:2)
Where are these new secluded grounds? I've searched and searched but it seems all the world is filled
Re: (Score:1)
I remember the glory days of usenet, before AOL invaded...
Re: The proles have arrived (Score:2)
Re:Raise the price, please (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Very few. Most people buy a TV because it's a good deal for the size in a big box store. They don't understand any specs except buzzwords like HD, smart, and 4k.
I understand all that... I just don't want my TV to be "smart" or have "4K".
I have more Rokus and Firesticks than I have televisions (I didn't buy most of them)- and I'd much rather use a replaceable and upgradable external device of my choice to make my TV "smart" than have one prebaked.
As for 4K- seems superfluous to my demands, it would be nice, be don't need the extra cost, and the cable ISP that has a monopoly in my area isn't good enough to really support 4K straming so it's a waste on me anyway.
Just
Re: (Score:2)
How hard is this?
Pretty much impossible when your TV service is supplied via internet and/or wireless router.
Re: Raise the price, please (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Me too, but the TV won't act like a dumb display and just always default to hdmi input... The smart and tuner functions keep popping up and i have to switch it back to hdmi input.
Re: (Score:2)
Thankfully, my TV doesn't do this and defaults to last input that was used. HDMI in my case.
Re: Raise the price, please (Score:2)
That isn't hard. Use a Roku, Apple TV, or firetv as your source inout and the tb itself doesn't have to connect.
I use Roku. While Roku wants a credit card I used one that was expiring, and haven't updated it.
If I want new subscriptions I subscribe either directly or through Amazon.
Directly has the benefit of cancelling easier
Re: (Score:3)
Just do what I do. Don't connect your TV to WiFi. Instead, plug in a Roku stick (or Fire Stick or Chromecast) and connect THAT to your WiFi. The TV won't be exposed to the Internet at all.
Re: (Score:2)
HDMI actually has a network data channel, so the TV might yet have network access. Also, some TVs are promiscuous and connect to open WAPs without permission.
Re: Raise the price, please (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3)
I share your prediction. Good thing I'm handy with a soldering iron.
Honestly, I'd be shocked if there weren't already agreements between the TV manufacturers and companies like Comcast to let their TVs have unfettered access to the Xfinity WiFi that their modems are pumping out. My Vizio monitor is required to be connected to WiFi in order to control anything about the TV beyond basic on/off functions. I just relegated the damn thing to it's own "guest" network that doesn't get access to the internet. Fu
Re: (Score:2)
I share your prediction. Good thing I'm handy with a soldering iron.
Just wait until you get sued under the DMCA for "circumvention"
Re: Raise the price, please (Score:2)
> in a very short time they will come with a 5G radio that you dont control
And, what? You think they won't have a HDMI port? Jesus, even the worst bargain-priced Black Friday piece of shit in electronics history came with a HDMI port, composite+stereo, and an antenna input. Most have multiple HDMI, a component port or two, at least one s-video plus multiple composite & stereo inputs, Toslink and/or S/PDIF input (and usually, one for output, see note).
Many even have a useless VGA port ("useless", beca
Re: Raise the price, please (Score:4, Insightful)
"And, what? You think they won't have a HDMI port? "
You are Missing the point.
If it has a 5g radio built in, with its cellular network access cost worked out as some combination of an advertising deal with facebook, a bulk volume bandwidth pre-purchase from your local ISP. Then YOU won't need to hook it up to the internet, because when you turn it on out of the box, it already has an internet connection, ready to send all the telemetry while downloading software updates and advertising from the word go.
It doesn't need to be on your network, so it doesn't need to go through your firewall.
What possible security or control do you hope to gain from it having an hdmi port?
Maybe, if you are lucky, there will an option in settings to turn it off, and maybe if your are lucky they will honor that setting. Otherwise, unless you live in a concrete subbasement basement, a faraday cage, or the artic circle... your TV will be online.
Re: (Score:2)
> What possible security or control do you hope to gain from it having an hdmi port?
Er.... being able to completely ignore the remainder of the TV's alleged capabilities, and use it as a dumb video display to watch content using devices that ARE under my own control? With a means of directly feeding video into my TV and using it directly as a dumb video display, everything else becomes largely moot.
> your TV will be online.
Big. Fscking. Deal. If it's not on my home network, and I'm using it as a dumb
Re: (Score:2)
"Worst-case, your 7 year old smart TV someday connects to a 5G network without your permission, gets bricked by hackers"
Worst case? You lack imagination friend.
Worst case hackers grab it via shodan etc; and turn it into a cryptocoin miner, so it cranks at full cpu usage 24x7 on you, while they allocate the rest of the available flash storage on it (since it needs to be able to download new apps and app updates) to serve child porn, while using the built in camera and mic (it came with skype video calls as
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, please. An average "smart" TV is dumber than a 4 year old Roku. An average gaming mouse probably has more onboard flash than an average "smart" TV.
Cryptocoin mining? Give me a break. The "smart" TVs I've seen huff and puff just trying to display a fsck'ing MENU on the screen. Their ability to decode h.264 on the fly is an illusion... it's all done by limited-purpose hardware, stapled together by a "computer" that's about as powerful as a SNES.
Serving child porn? Via some mystical 5G free data that was f
Re: (Score:2)
"Oh, please. An average "smart" TV is dumber than a 4 year old Roku."
Extrapolate to a future where its got a 5g radio, and it'll have at least a mediocre mobile SoC like you'd see in an android or iphone, a couple GB ram, and enough SSD. You can already get android tvs.
"Even IF (big IF) future "smart" TVs include "free" 5G data service for some purpose"
You can already get lots of devices that include cellular data at no extra charge. Where 'lifetime data' has been prepaid in an arrangement with carriers; ye
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Wrap that rascal!!!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Raise the price, please (Score:4, Interesting)
Why would they waste money on a 5G modem and on-going cellular data costs when the user is very likely to connect it to their wifi for free anyway?
Also it would be pointless in Europe because the user could just decline he mandatory opt-in permission request, and agreement cannot legally be forced by making it mandatory to use the functions of the TV.
Re: (Score:2)
If you donâ(TM)t want a smart TV, donâ(TM)t connect it to the internet. How hard is this?
I think you miss the point. Of course I can just not set up the smart parts of the TV... I just don't want them. Or the extra costs involved in making the smart TV. Why pay extra for a feature I have no use for?
$20 you can get a superior external device that you can replace- why would I want an inferior product, that I can't replace, and have to pay more for it as a result?
Re: (Score:2)
As for 4K- seems superfluous to my demands, it would be nice, be don't need the extra cost, and the cable ISP that has a monopoly in my area isn't good enough to really support 4K straming so it's a waste on me anyway.
Console games are SOOO much better in 4k, though! That's what I use it for.
Re: (Score:3)
The really unfortunate part, based on how some "apps" are coming out on smart TV stores before th
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Raise the price, please (Score:4, Insightful)
If vendors would offer that as an option I expect they would be surprised how many people would take it.
I'd be surprised if many did take it. Almost everything I know about marketing says that the segment of the market that cares that much about this is minuscule. The ones that don't will continue to use price as a prime criterion for their purchase decision.
Re: (Score:2)
If vendors would offer that as an option I expect they would be surprised how many people would take it.
I'd be surprised if many did take it. Almost everything I know about marketing says that the segment of the market that cares that much about this is minuscule. The ones that don't will continue to use price as a prime criterion for their purchase decision.
People that are using price as criterion are going to the cheaper brands, especially the ones that in CRT era were famous for their quality, like Telefunken, Nordmende, Saba or Akai.
On the other hand most people don't understand all the TV features, I know people that have bought a new TV with terrestrial and satellite tuner without having a satellite dish because it was a special offer and was cheap, same thing goes for smart options or similar things.
Most people are ok with normal TV and actually don'
Re: (Score:2)
But ... but ... but ... CHECKBOX TICK!
Because that's what steers buyer decisions. People don't understand what their TVs can do. To them, HDMI is about the same as DLNA, four letters that their TV "has". Or doesn't have. But having is better than not having. So what these people do is to compare TVs by the little cards that are attached to them, and by the checkboxes that are ticked on each of them. And if there's one TV with 6 checkboxes ticked it's better than the one with 5 checkboxes ticked. Which check
Re: (Score:2)
I would much rather pay a higher price and be without all that crap. If vendors would offer that as an option I expect they would be surprised how many people would take it.
They do offer that. Buy a commercial display intended for digital signage in a conference center. They are dumb, and usually have lots of inputs.
Re: (Score:3)
Unfortunately, since McAfee is likely paying per TV it's installed in, the price might actually drop the more garbage they load in. Then, customers might tend to buy the cheaper (more bloat-ridden) TVs and this could become the norm.
I really hope not, though. I don't even connect my TV to my WiFi. I use a Roku stick to stream. I'd buy a "dumb TV" if they offered them anymore. I definitely don't need an anti-virus program on my TV.
Re: (Score:2)
So-called "smart" anything are cancer. (Score:1)
They are literally cancer. They spread and ruin everything in their way. Dystopian nightmare of total surveillance.
Re: (Score:2)
Beats using stacks of AOL CDs
Re:Not that simple (Score:5, Insightful)
mcafee is one of the worst violators of consumer privacy. their antivirus crap sends a whole metric ton of information back to the mother ship which is then sold to analytics firms for tracking consumer behavior.
This move has next to nothing about actually using the software as an antivirus; it's entirely about harvesting that sweet sweet data.
Re: It's a conglomerate, writer? (Score:2, Insightful)
Each part of a business has to make money in order, someone, somewhere in Samsung cares about the extra money
Re: (Score:1)
Really, Samsung is heavy industry. Their consumer crap is like a hobby. But they have to fill the ships they build with something so that they're not empty when going out to bring in more raw materials. I mean, you shouldn't see the waitress walking around empty handed.
Re: (Score:2)
The TV division, or whatever that bit is called, no doubt have their own budget and revenue goals. If things are not going well they'll come under scrutiny from the mothership.
There is ofcourse cooperation across divisions to satisfy company goals, like correlating consumer TV habits with everything they know about people from Phones and Bigsby.
Re: (Score:2)
This would require smart customers. Have you ever met one?
Re: (Score:2)
Economies of scale means that manufacturers don't want to make dumb TVs as a distinct product line. They were probably already being kickbacks from Netflix et. al. long before McAfee, so smart TVs are probably cheaper all around.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, some CEO said recently that profit on hardware sales was around 7% he admitted it was their own fault but in any case it's now necessary to boost profit in other ways. Selling information about consumer TV habits is no 1 (gathered through internet connected Smart TVs), getting a few kickbacks is probably welcomed as well.
AV on TV (Score:2)
I hate AVs in computers itself so never install it. But I guess we won't be able to uninstall it from TV.
Lets look at potential issues with this
Performance issues with TV
More internet usage for AV updates [That goes from our bill ]
Random removal of TV apps which are considered as virus by AV
Annoying messages for AV updates
Annoying messages for upgrading to premium version
What else?
Re:AV on TV (Score:5, Insightful)
Yeah, I'm curious... how this is going to work? Is it going to work like the McAfee bloatware on retail PC, where I'm going to get pestered to upgrade to the "Pro" version every time I turn on the TV?
Also, do I have the option to uninstall the software? If not, I'm pretty sure that they're going to lose some customers over this.
(Frankly, I'm amazed that Microsoft hasn't allowed AntiVirus programs for the XBox yet. It's much more like a PC than a SmartPC is.
Re: (Score:1)
Right, because tv consumers care about "bloatware." It is less than 1% of the consumer market that would care. Most tv consumers are LOOKING for these apps on their tv's to make it easier.
Re: (Score:3)
If it affects the TV operation the way it does a PC, consumers will care. They'll have to run the TV on fast forward all the time to compensate for the slow-down, and fast forward usually disables the sound.
Re: (Score:2)
According to McAfee you can actually delete it: https://service.mcafee.com/web... [mcafee.com]
I guess you "need" it because Tizen OS has an app store and like all app stores it sometimes gets malware in it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yet strangely the news were more informative and the programming was generally better...
Re: (Score:2)
The difference is that this was two incidences over a decade. Today you get that a magnitude larger before the evening news are even being invented.
I like my TVs the way I like my toasters... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Frakkin Cylons!
You kiddin' me? (Score:4, Funny)
Welp (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Right.. Next will be LG coming with TVs with Nortan AV installed
Malware as standard (Score:5, Informative)
Off sourcing a core function? (Score:1, Interesting)
If the so called anti virus is just a digital signature verification system to make certain that the firmware and so called apps are legit then it makes sense. Could be that MacAfee is just taking over what is becoming an essential function of their software control quality control. I guess that all the experience of years spent building a software digital signature checking system that run at high priority make it so that it is cheaper for Samsung to outsource the essential process rather than do the essen
Sven Toolie (Score:2)
I'm afraid to buy a new TV. It's bad enough the cable company and Netflix know exactly what I am watching. Now the TV company does, too?
Putting the cart before the horse? (Score:3)
I can see the need for AV on general-purpose devices like computers where user input can be VERY difficult to predict and it's hard to keep users from screwing everything up by starting a program they shouldn't. But how in the world is this possible in a walled-off environment like a TV where you can literally ONLY run whatever the maker lets you?
Samsung, if you have a security problem in your walled garden, YOU screwed up. Fix the problem instead of slapping a band-aid on it!
Re: (Score:2)
It's because TV vendors make overly complicated Smart TVs to do anything. Sometimes they are essentially general purpose PCs hobbled to only show videos. This wouldn't be an issue if the manufacturer addressed security concerns, but then they don't supply updates because they've released a new model and would rather you buy that one. (Because everyone is going to by a new $500 TV every year, right?) So what you get is a computer inside your TV, connected to WiFi, and which doesn't get updates. It's a recip
Yet another reason not to buy a Samsung TV (Score:4, Interesting)
I mean why should I pay for a TV from a company that sees me as its product?
My Synology NAS has antivirus, why not a SmartTV? (Score:3)
Yup. They Offer two tiers.
A free antivirus provided by Synology based on ClamAV, and a paid one by McAfee. Both are optional to install. I installed the ClamAV one.
After all, the Synology is, at its core, a Linux Box connected to the net, and therefore suceptible to viruses and worms. Granted, less susceptible than, let's say, a windows box, but susceptible nonetheless. So, an antivirus is a nice addition to the defense in depth*, multiple layers of defense, whathaveyou.
The Samsung TV is, at its core, a box running a Linux/BSD core (Bada, which is what samsung uses, can use either) connected to the net, so it should use an Antivirus. Defense in depth, multiple layers of defense and all that...
Having it Pre-Installed is a way to simplify things for less sophisticated users, and (sadly) monetize them post sale as well.
Let alone the publicity for McAfee: my SmartTV uses McAfee antivirus, when time comes to chose an antivirus for my new PC/company/small business, may use McAfee as well (or so goes the thinking of the marketeers).
JM2C
* Some of the defenses for my Syno are, in no particular order:
1.) Use 9.9.9.9 as the DNS of the Syno.
2.) Activate the FW on the Ingress Router of NW.
3.) Activate SW Firewall on the Syno itself.
4.) Keep Syno Updated on Patches. Also patch syno packages.
5.) Run AV on Syno.
6.) Periodicaly run Security Advisor on Syno.
7.) Disable SMB 1 on Syno.
8.) Secure the WiFi network as much as possible.
Re:My Synology NAS has antivirus, why not a SmartT (Score:4, Interesting)
AV on your NAS is not designed to protect the NAS itself, its designed to detect windows malware being put onto the storage device and thus spread to other windows clients that are accessing it.
Re: (Score:2)
It does protect against Linux malware too. It's a Linux box running an older kernel with numerous services exposed, and periodically exploits are found.
For example, this flaw in Samba was pretty severe: https://nakedsecurity.sophos.c... [sophos.com]
Still not convinced that McAfee is the best solution, but a Linux based NAS is not immune to malware either.
Re: (Score:2)
Ensuring the kernel and those services are patched and hardened would do far more good than running an av scan...
Last i checked the state of linux av it couldnt pick up old stuff like lrk (linux rootkit) or the various variants like t0rnkit or modified versions of sshd etc... Also most linux rootkits tend to be manually installed rather than automatically spreading, so if someone semi competent compromises the host and installs a rootkit, they will also notice the scheduled scans and work out how to evade t
Re: (Score:2)
Nope, It also checks the Syno partition looking for Linux viruses. As a matter of fact, the default check is to check only the system partion every day, as a full NAS check would take way too much time.
Amyjojo already explained it.
Re: (Score:2)
You do know that ClamAV is intended to find Windows malware on Linux hosted email servers or samba shares? And that's it?
Nope, It also checks the Syno partition looking for Linux viruses. As a matter of fact, the default check is to check only the system partion every day, as a full NAS check would take way too much time.
Amyjojo already explained it.
Oblig xkcd (Score:5, Funny)
https://xkcd.com/463/ [xkcd.com]
Er ... (Score:3)
... hopefully I don't actually have to break tradition and read the fine article.
Isn't this a closed system? WTH would you need antivirus for? Poltergeists?
useless (Score:3)
Oh good lord, are they putting McAfee Security Scan Plus on their TVs? That thing doesn't do anything useful. It just natters at you and promotes their for-pay product. It's the first thing I uninstall.
Is it *possible* to uninstall it from your TV?
Tizen is Linux (Score:2)
With Linux basically running on all our TVs now, it seems very reasonable to consider AV on our embedded computers with large displays.
Samsung should stick to hardware (Score:1)
There are reasons for this (Score:2)
I saw an article around a year ago - and I think it was on this site - claiming that the OS Samsung use for TVs was hopelessly insecure, and that whoever had written it simply did not have a clue about security. I believe that OS was Tizen, it was certainly something Samsung wrote themselves.
Assuming the article was accurate, Samsung should have had a serious go at fixing it. That costs money. What we see here is something that raises the bar a little and is actually revenue-positive. Win win from Samsu
Illegal under GDPR? (Score:2)
So, if the purpose of the antivirus-software is gathering information to phone home, without the users knowledge (explicit and informed consent), those tvs would be illegal to be sold in the EU due to the GDPR (privacy laws).
Why does McAfee pay? (Score:2)
Why does McAfee pay to have his antivirus installed? They would not do that without a plan to recover the cost and make money
Are we ahead of another privacy scandal, with data sucked from smartTV by a rogue antivirus?
what's next? (Score:2)
nike putting mcafee on their shoes?!
Re: (Score:2)
mod parent as spam