Sony Pulls Spider-Man Out of the MCU Over Profit-Sharing Dispute With Disney (theverge.com) 182
Marvel Studios president Kevin Feige has pulled out of producing future Spider-Man movies. From a report: The news was first reported by Deadline and later confirmed by Sony Pictures. According to Deadline's reporting, the break is due to disputes between Sony -- which still holds the rights to the character -- and Marvel's parent company Disney over revenue sharing from films starring the web-slinging hero. The news means that Spider-Man's appearances in Disney's Marvel Cinematic Universe films -- as well as crossovers from characters like Robert Downey Jr.'s Iron Man or Samuel L. Jackson's Nick Fury in future Spider-Man films -- could end with Spider-Man: Far From Home, released earlier this summer.
Precursor (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Is this just a precursor to another reboot?
You mean Spiderman: This Time for Sure ?
The list of characters Disney doesn't own (no idea how out of date this is)
https://screenrant.com/marvel-... [screenrant.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The article is from 2017. Disney now has access to the characters it got with the Fox acquisition like x-men and fantastic four.
I've dug a coupe layers deep and it all seems to be from now. Can you lead me to the 2017 article?
Re: (Score:2)
The link he gave, https://screenrant.com/marvel-... [screenrant.com], says right at the top "by Tom Chapman â" on Jul 08, 2017 in SR Originals".
Re: (Score:2)
The link he gave, https://screenrant.com/marvel-... [screenrant.com], says right at the top "by Tom Chapman â" on Jul 08, 2017 in SR Originals".
Oh hell - my bad! Yup, I was looking at the wrong links.
Time for the Wednesday dumbshit award for me...
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry, that is reserved for whomever came up with the most recent Spider-Man reboot
Re: (Score:2)
The Andrew Garfield Spider-Mans (Spider-Men?) were forgettable.
Tom Holland seems to be pretty good in the role, and his movies are more interesting. It's nice to see Super Hero movies that aren't about saving the world, or galaxy, or universe. In the first movie, the villain is a former construction worker who just wants to steal some super-powered junk, wreckage left behind from the first Avengers movie. In the second, the villain is a scam artist who tricks everyone into thinking he's all that, when he do
Re: (Score:2)
Time for the Wednesday dumbshit award for me...
Wednesday is Hump Day. Just bend over and all the trolls will come running. ;)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: Look at Star Wars? No, thanks! (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
Hans Solo was slammed in all the reviews I saw
Yes, I remember the German version of Star Wars.
I think it was called "Nicht wars"
As well as Hans Solo, I really liked Jabba the Hun.
Disney wasn't after social justice (Score:2)
See, the fans were gonna go see the movie no matter what. Disney knows this. They're after the most valuable audience in history: Young Girls ages 9-14. Girls that age basically stop consuming. While boys are buying sports gear, guitars, video games, etc girls are just waiting to grow up. They're too old to play Barbie but not old enough to drive and wear makeup (and more importantly _buy_ make
Re:Precursor (Score:5, Insightful)
If you're going to pre-emptively complain about the X-Men franchise being "woke", given its long comic book history, then I don't know what to tell you. It's kind of its' whole thing. It's like saying "I don't like when Captain America punches Nazis," or "Superman is too much of a goodie-two-shoes," or "Batman always solves crimes - it's so predictable." Like, yeah.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
If you're going to pre-emptively complain about the X-Men franchise being "woke", given its long comic book history, then I don't know what to tell you.
"Long comic book history"? You must be young. I was around for the JFK assassination (no, I wasn't old enough to be a second shooter) and the Mercury space missions. X-Men is a Johnny-come-lately, particularly when you look at Superman, Wonder Woman, etc. and yes, compared to those far older characters and franchises, X-Men started relatively woke and is just getting progressively worse. And don't even get me started on what Disney and that stupid cunt they put in charge of the franchise did to Star Wars.
St
Relatively Woke? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
X-Men were woke as f*.
I meant "relatively" in comparison to super-woke crap like the recent Star Wars movies and spin-offs. Holy shit, talk about shoving the dreck down customer's throats! You're correct in comparison to traditional Superman, Captain America, etc., no argument.
Strat
Yes, but... (Score:2)
Are those characters more like plantation slaves OR more like prostitutes working for a pimp?
Is Spidey gonna get flogged or will Sony have to choke a bitch if he gets uppity?
I need that for the next time I talk with a six-year-old about intricacies of modern intellectual property and why a man on TV is now SupertrademarkmanTM and not that other man said child remembers in that role.
Also, when explaining the inevitable replacement of Tony Stark with a guy who doesn't have to wear phonebook shoes during press
Re: (Score:2)
please be both
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If it's a Sony reboot, fuck it, I pass.
So sick of this shit.
Re:Precursor (Score:5, Insightful)
They can reboot it as many times as they want. Spiderman still sucks. Possibly even more than Batman.
Re: (Score:3)
They can reboot it as many times as they want. Spiderman still sucks. Possibly even more than Batman.
+5 insightful
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I disagree. Batman was most awesome as its most serious. The Dark Knight was most definitely peak batman.
The days of bat nipples and Schwarzenegger spewing out one-liners while acrobats dance in the foreground are thankfully behind us.
Unfortunately seriousness is not the only criteria and the current batman ala DC Universe has been MAAARRRTHERED into a completely senseless parody of himself.
Re: (Score:2)
Christopher Nolan's Batman movies were fucking awful. Batman is supposed to be campy.
Re: (Score:2)
Opinions are like arseholes everyone has one. My own arsehole says that Batman's current iteration is absolute garbage, and Spiderman finally got a decent reboot, to say absolutely nothing of the incredible animated movie that came out at the start of the year.
Re: (Score:2)
Is this just a precursor to another reboot?
God I hope not.
Re: (Score:2)
Is this just a precursor to another reboot?
It's worse than that, Jim.
It's a reboot with a rootkit!
Re: (Score:2)
It's been about 45 minutes since the last reboot, so it's overdue.
Re: (Score:2)
Spiderman beats up Hong Kong Terrorists in new movie: "Taiwan is, and always will be, a province of China : Chinese Spiderman".
I mean going off the fact Sony made all it money on Venom from China, that would make sense.
You kind of have to reboot it every few years (Score:2)
What that means is your actor is going to outgrow the roll. And that means you're stuck with a reboot of some kind.
Myths are directly tied to our culture (Score:5, Interesting)
Myths are a reflection of the culture in which they are told. Our culture is post modernist and greedy, therefore, out myths are subject to change whenever profit moves around.
As a culture, we really should get better myths though.
Re: (Score:2)
As a culture, we really should get better myths though.
As myths go, Middle Earth is damn fine mythology. Of course it's nearing a century old, so it's not from modern culture...
The next movies based on strands of The Silmarillion could be excellent myths. Unfortunately they're bare-bones so the drooling morons at New Line Cinema will inevitably fuck them all up. Beren and Lúthien could be told as the most spectacular love story since Romeo and Juliet. New Line will see to it that it's as shitty as Did You Hear About the Morgans [rottentomatoes.com]. Shit, they'll probably
Does anyone over the age of 18 give a damn? (Score:2, Interesting)
Do any adults actually watch this superhero shit with wooden plots and actors dressed up in pseudo S&M gear?
Re:Does anyone over the age of 18 give a damn? (Score:4, Funny)
Do any adults actually watch this superhero shit with wooden plots and actors dressed up in pseudo S&M gear?
I do...mostly for the S&M gear.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
You can't pull those kind of numbers targeting a single demographic.
Of course you can. That demographic is called "China".
Agree 100% (Score:2)
I'd be so happy if this shit died off already. I didn't care for them as a kid and I certainly don't give a shit at this point.
Re: (Score:3)
I'd be so happy if this shit died off already. I didn't care for them as a kid and I certainly don't give a shit at this point.
Honest question here: Why would you be happy. Presumably something you don't care about going away would be neutral at best. In order for you to be happy about something dying off, it has to be actively or indirectly affecting you in a negative way, so in what way are you being negatively affected by the MCU?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Thanks for that really useful "Only pay $49 per month for access" link. Want to try again with something more useful?
Re: Does anyone over the age of 18 give a damn? (Score:2)
Re: Does anyone over the age of 18 give a damn? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And Disney made its billions making films for adults did it? Kids films clean up, but equally once you're older they become first boring then laughable. Superhero films fit firmly in the latter.
Re: Does anyone over the age of 18 give a damn? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, Disney made billions on kids movies, and YES Disney has made billions on adult movies... and they will continue to do so because their interest is in making money. Your opinion has nothing to do with the reality of that.
I rather enjoy the MCU movies... they are filled with action, good actors, humor, and are a nice way to spend a couple hours where i don't have to think much. Nothing wrong wit
Re: (Score:2)
I rather enjoy the MCU movies... they are filled with action, good actors, humor, and are a nice way to spend a couple hours where i don't have to think much. Nothing wrong with that at all.
Exactly. If I want to watch something cerebral, depressing, or will make me think I'll watch something like Downfall or Conspiracy (which Conspiracy can literally be described as the meeting from hell). Sometimes I just want to mindlessly watch a bunch of shit blow up, and the Marvel movies have good acting, good production values, and coherent stories.
Not another Spiderman origin story and new actor (Score:2)
Sony will give us another Spiderman origin story but adding in the pg13 Venom and a pg13 Carnage for ultimate watered down sewer sludge. The cgi will look like Jurassic Part part 2 quality, and may as well be directed by Roger Corman.
In other news... (Score:3)
Pig To Human Heart Transplants 'Possible Within Three Years'
It seems that it was already successfully done a few times. The people in this story cannot be said to have a human heart.
With apologies to all the pigs, off course.
Enough! (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Enough! (Score:4, Insightful)
Do they still make a half billion dollars a piece? Then clearly the answer is no.
Re: (Score:2)
after stan lee died disney needed to cash in.
Re: (Score:2)
No, we've only had 2. Unless you count the whiny bitch or the one who can't look a girl in the eyes.
Also why is it that people complain about a bunch of movies totaling all up less than 15 hours of runtime but will happily enjoy 70+ hours of Game of Thrones. Why complain about 7 movies no one is forcing you to watch but not the 238 episodes of Friends?
At least with the most recent reboot has been universally good rather than shitting on the series with emo-man in the first version or girl in the refrigerato
Screw Disney, they are ruining everything (Score:2)
Most recent issue, last weekend, UFC was $80, $50 to join ESPN+ (I don't watch the regular channel) then $30 for the fights. Skipped it, read the results Sunday morning.
The Disney conglomerate represents about 40% of every cable bill (Disney, ESPN, ABC, Marvel, LucasFilm/Star Wars).
I compare and contrast against Netflix, which built it's way to the top of the streaming market, rather that just buying other people's content.
I'm pissed that there will only be two seasons of Iron Fist on Netflix, it's an amaz
Re: (Score:2)
> I compare and contrast against Netflix, which built it's way to the top of the streaming market, rather that just buying other people's content.
Netflix worked its way to the top by
1) Renting out DVDs of other peoples content via mail, which turned out far better than blockbuster
2) Building on that to stream other peoples movies, because they understood the future and the beomouths didn't
However now the content producers are catching up, Netflix has to pay more for the streaming rights, and has a lot of
Re: (Score:2)
A bit of a mixed bag Netflix, at least here in .au there are some very good Netflix produced shows, and a load of very average ones.
However, it’s still easier to find free/ad supported streaming sites that have a far greater range of content.
Re: (Score:2)
It always starts with one show, why wouldn't you include that?
Re: (Score:2)
It was one film, to test the waters. A pilot if you will. Netflix didn't really start heavily investing in shows until they had made it big by buying other shows.
Re: (Score:2)
I compare and contrast against Netflix, which built it's way to the top of the streaming market, rather that just buying other people's content.
HAHHHHAHHHHAHHAHAHHHAHHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA. Sorry, i had to assume you were trying to be funny. Built with EVERYONE ELSE'S content.
Re: (Score:2)
ESPN alone accounts for 40%.
Iron fist is only a good show if you realize them main character is as dumb as a brick.
The choreography is terrible and nonsensical, especially in Season 1.
I'm no Sony fan (Score:3)
And they're my least favorite of the two. But this seems like it's completely justified.
If anything, more like another example of Disney's tiring reach.
Sony's just pouting (Score:2)
Somebody asked "Haven't we had enough Spider-Man movies?" with the answer being "If they're still making $500M each than the answer is no."
Well, they're not quite making $500M a pop (https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=spiderman.htm) but what you can see is that the Sony non-MCU films have been dropping off over the years. No surprise because they keep bringing out the same product with what I consider more boring actors - Tobey Maguire did an adequate job if you were only looking at the '60
Re: (Score:2)
Didn't Sony do "Into the spiderverse"?
Yes, yes they did.
Do you even think about what you post?
All the Russo brothers did was make Spider-man an ironman with webs.
Re: (Score:2)
Take a look at the link I included.
Into the spiderverse made $190M, which is the lowest of the eight Spider-Man movies, which is exactly my point.
I have no problem with this (Score:3)
Since the just want to turn Spider-Man into an Ironman clone in the MCU, I have no problem with this.
Re: (Score:2)
It kinda makes sense individually, but it doesn't work when you do it for all of them.
Re: (Score:2)
Iron Man? Iron Man suit.
War Machine? Iron Man suit.
Spider Man? Iron Man suit, but if you need the suit in order to do Iron Man suit things, you don't deserve to have it.
Vision? Iron Man suit but it's sentient I guess?
Black Panther? Iron Man suit but vibranium lol.
Bruce Banner with ED? Iron Man suit!
Hulk with glasses? Iron Man suit!
Endgame sucked ass, and the MCU is effectively over.
The Mouse needs to die (Score:3)
Every franchise Disney has gotten hold of has degenerated into crap. I'd have thought it was impossible to make two-dimensional characters even MORE two dimensional while simultaneously reducing the stories they appear in to formulaic cookie-cutter drek. Somehow they've managed.
This is what happens when bean counters wind up in charge, and every single aspect of an entertainment enterprise is viewed through the lens of emptying consumers' wallets as comprehensively as possible.
I don't think a lot of people expected that movies based on comic books and westerns moved into space would win any heavy-duty literature/arts awards, but at least they had soul, and a certain sense of wonder. Disney has managed to suck all that out, leaving nothing behind but the empty shell.
In this wonder-proof, corpora-tainment world where everything has a price but nothing has value, I suddenly have a new appreciation for "Invasion of the Body Snatchers".
Re: (Score:2)
I would think it is closer to "They Live".
I wonder if he meant old uncle Obi-wan (Score:2)
With great power comes great greed.
Re: (Score:3)
Like Star Wars Galaxies....
Re: (Score:3)
Man, that still hurts me... Such a great game ruined by Sony Online Entertainment.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No, Disney want to change the deal so that they provide 50% of the funding in exchange for 50% of the "first dollar box office gross", and that it will allow Kevin Feige to work with Sony.
Apparently the current deal is that Disney get 5% of the first dollar box office gross and contribute Kevin Feige (giving an idea of how much he's worth).
Re: (Score:3)
No, Disney want to change the deal so that they provide 50% of the funding in exchange for 50% of the "first dollar box office gross", and that it will allow Kevin Feige to work with Sony.
Apparently the current deal is that Disney get 5% of the first dollar box office gross and contribute Kevin Feige (giving an idea of how much he's worth).
Keep in mind that Disney has all the money from the merchandising rights so they have plenty of ways that Sony does not to make money from those movies. It used to be that Sony had those rights but they sold the rights back to Marvel [comicbook.com] which was a foolish move on their part at the time.
Re: (Score:2)
Disney isn't blameless here either. Their Bill Gates style market grab for everything from BluRay, Ultraviolet, Movie Studios, Streaming Services, ABC, Marvel Comics, Star Trek, Star Wars, its all excessive greed. They probably own a couple newspapers I don’t know about too.
Damn near everything you see here or touch in the entertainment industry is practically owned by Disney now. You get to see what they want you to see and have the story told the way they want the story told in order to dra
Re: (Score:2)
Damn near everything you see here or touch in the entertainment industry is practically owned by Disney now.
If only we had actual antitrust enforcement. This has been a long time in the making, both parties have been asleep at the antitrust wheel for ages.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"left-wing" FTFA - they were socialists who didn't believe in the free market.
Oh please- read a book and stop spouting such obvious bullshit.
Let me guess- the "Gott mit uns ("God with us") phrase on the Nazis belt buckles really meant they were actually closet atheists, right?
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed. Hitler was authoritarian with policies that, on average, place him about the middle of the left-right span. That average, though, came from widely disparate policies implemented to further his goals of racial purity and German dominance, and he could and did radically change his policies if he felt something different would achieve those goals. For example, contrary to common right-wing propaganda, Hitler actually expanded gun ownership, but not for Jews or other "undesirables." He also called for c
Re: (Score:2)
Anyone who tries to place Hitler or the NSDAP squarely within the left or right sphere doesn't know what they're talking about.
There's a reason why a real political spectrum has both an X and Y axis. For example an ideologically left state (USSR) and an ideologically right state(Nazi Germany) on opposite ends of the X axis both had a highly state-controlled economy, putting them both in the authoritarian (top) end of the Y axis. A pure socialist state-in the strict sense of true, full communal ownership of production and property, would fall at the bottom end of the Y axis, but could theoretically fall on either end of the X axis
Re: (Score:2)
You need to get educated. Hitler was a fascist. Hitler and the NAZI party was right wing. Fascism is right wing. You pick apart small things he did and suggest that some are left wing, when you ignore WHY he did them and HOW he did them. He didn't have a welfare safety net for the people, he had one for his Aryans and the woman who produced more blond haired/blue eyes children. Context matters.
ANYONE who suggest Hitler or the NAZI party was left wing socialist is
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
> (most) comic book movies are formulaic, because their source material is. I've enjoyed the MCU for what is.
Me too. Turn you brain off, sit back, and just enjoy the experience -- they have been mostly entertaining. Although lately some of them have been meh to just out right bad.
Pro: It's a Marvel movie
Con: It's a Marvel movie
With a Marvel movie you know _exactly_ what you are getting: X% action, Y% humor, Z% love interest, W% world building. Unfortunately they are also extremely formulaic with numerou
Re: (Score:2)
Why Jurassic Park Looks Better Than Its Sequels [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Fantastic analysis! It's amazing that a 25+ year old movie holds up extremely well.
What do you think of Steven Spielberg's 80's & 90's films versus his latest stuff? Has he jumped the shark?
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe he realized that making crappy movies still made him mountains of cash anyway, so why bother?
Re: (Score:2)
But Ready Player One was such a masterpiece! /sarcasm
I think there might be something to your theory -- along with relying on Form over Function -- but maybe that is just Hollywood resorting to an over abundance of CGI to make up for a shitty story these days? I mean this is an industry that made a such "quality" movies such as "Battleship" and "Emoji". LOL. **Double Facepalm**
It appears that he just stopped caring / trying at this point. :-/
Looks like others thought it sucked [youtube.com] as well.
Oh well. With all the
Re: (Score:2)
A friend once apty referred to such movies as “chewing gum for the mind”.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, aren't you THE expert...
(note: I don't read comic books but at the same time I despise those who categorize them like that)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Another Cinematic universe attempt? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Another Cinematic universe attempt? (Score:4, Insightful)
You're aware you forgot to click the "Post Anonymously" checkbox before stating falsehoods as fact, right?
The closest I could find to anything of the sort was a comment made by J.R.R. Tolkien's eldest son—a Catholic priest accused of sexually abusing children—saying after the allegations were levied against him that a friend of his father likely did things to him when he was a child, though he never named names or alleged anything specific.
Mind you, there's no evidence that a crime ever occurred; the son admits that he was asleep the entire time, that he's not sure anything actually happened, and only made his claim after he was accused of sexually abusing children; there are numerous, plausible explanations for what he described that don't involve abuse in the first place (e.g. he wet the bed); and that in all of this, the one and only tie to C.S. Lewis is that he was a friend of J.R.R. Tolkien's. One of many friends. That's literally the only connection.
Even if we accept that Tolkien's son was abused, which is far from being a given, I don't see how you can make the leap to assuming Lewis was the guy.
Re: (Score:2)
I think the OP is likely confusing C.S. Lewis with Lewis Carroll:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
(although these allegations are contested too)
Re: (Score:2)
Comic books and superheroes are for nine year old boys.
Well, comic books and superheroes aren't my thing, but if other people like them then I'm happy to see them find some enjoyment in it.
Of all the things I could criticize people for doing, enjoying comic books and superheroes aren't on the list.
Re: (Score:2)
Well to be fair, if Sony hadn't done the first Spider-man movies (i.e the. Sam Raimi trilogy) the MCU may never have been a thing either. It was the success of the first Spider-man movie that kicked off the current comic book movie genre (at least on the Marvel side of things).
I guess you could argue it was the X-men or Blade movie that kicked things off but I think it was the massive box office opening of Spider-man that proved that comic book movies were/are profitable.
Re: (Score:2)
And yet you posted. You read this story, claimed you don't care about it, but HAD to come here and tell us about it. I think you're just trying to look cool whereas in reality your own little inner child was just torn apart and this is your coping mechanism.