Emulating 'Trolls', More Movies Try Bypassing Cinemas For On-Demand Releases (theguardian.com) 60
Trolls World Tour won't be the last major-studio release to bypass movie theatres altogether. An anonymous reader quotes the Guardian:
Universal gets a greater cut of revenue from digital services than at the box office, which means the film has made the same amount of profit in its first three weeks as the first Trolls film did during its entire five-month run in U.S. cinemas.... "Universal has cast the first stone," said Jeff Bock, an analyst at research firm Exhibitor Relations. "This is exactly what the theatrical exhibition world had always feared -- proof that bypassing theatres could be a viable model of distribution for studios.
"Like it or not, the floodgates have opened. This is just the beginning, and the longer it takes for theatres to open on a worldwide scale, we're going to see the premium-video-on-demand schedule become more and more populated."
That schedule is now filling up. Universal announced last week that Judd Apatow's new comedy The King of Staten Island would scrap its planned cinema release on 19 June and premiere on-demand instead. And Warner Bros is doing the same with Scoob!, the first full-length animated Scooby-Doo film, which was meant to hit cinemas on 15 May...
The straight-to-digital strategy is only considered to be viable for mid- and lower-budget films forecast to earn at most a few hundred million at the global box office.
"Like it or not, the floodgates have opened. This is just the beginning, and the longer it takes for theatres to open on a worldwide scale, we're going to see the premium-video-on-demand schedule become more and more populated."
That schedule is now filling up. Universal announced last week that Judd Apatow's new comedy The King of Staten Island would scrap its planned cinema release on 19 June and premiere on-demand instead. And Warner Bros is doing the same with Scoob!, the first full-length animated Scooby-Doo film, which was meant to hit cinemas on 15 May...
The straight-to-digital strategy is only considered to be viable for mid- and lower-budget films forecast to earn at most a few hundred million at the global box office.
Wait, Trolls? (Score:5, Funny)
You're telling me they made a movie for our kind?
Re:Wait, Trolls? (Score:5, Funny)
You must be from the sequels Insightful, Informative, Interesting, and Funny.
Inevitable. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
On that note, now that AMC blacklisted Universal, I guess they'll have to blacklist Warner Bros as well. Soon enough, AMC will have blacklisted every big movie studio out there.
Re: (Score:3)
AMC is in check and running out of movies...
Re:Inevitable. (Score:4, Interesting)
They can try presenting more foreign films. Finally there will be more cinema and less sequels and remakes.
Re: (Score:2)
Hopefully this will drive more theaters to show older movies, which are much cheaper for them. I'd rather watch an older better movie than whatever trash happens to be brand new. And the people who want brand new stuff can go get fleeced by on demand services.
Re: (Score:2)
That only works if a reasonable fraction of people are willing to go see older movies in theaters. You may be willing to pay to see older movies in theaters, but unless you go almost as often as other people go to see newer movies, the theaters will still lose money.
Old movies are already mostly viewed via streaming services.
Re: Inevitable. (Score:2)
The theater business isn't in ticket sales, it's in concessions. Their business is managing their local market to show the right movies and fill as many seats as possible for the studios while taking all the profit from $5 sodas sold to a largely captive audience.
What killed theaters is their proliferation. No one wants to go to old theaters, so new theaters are built, but adding more seats means less money per theater.
Re: Inevitable. (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
If theaters stopped charging so much for tickets (and given that theaters do exist that don't charge rip-off prices for tickets, doing so must be possible) then more people would go and they wouldn't need to keep upping the price on concessions.
Re: Inevitable. (Score:2)
If you are competing on ticket price, you're going to end up targeting the people who can't afford to buy concessions. It's a race to the bottom.
Re: (Score:2)
The theater I go to here in Australia (or did go to before the current mess started) not only charges lower ticket prices but also concession prices that aren't obscene.
They can be so cheap because they have low overheads (I believe they actually own the buildings their cinemas are in for the most part although I could be wrong on that).
So it IS possible to have a cinema that has both low ticket prices AND concession prices low enough to get even cheapskates to buy.
Going to a movie theater is such an ordeal (Score:5, Insightful)
So it takes me something like a half hour to get off my couch, dress up, and drive to the movie theater. Once I am there I need to stomach about 25 minutes of commercials and previews. Then the three hour long movie starts. And that's actually my big complaint with modern movies. What happened with smart exciting two hour long movies? Any movie with a pretension for greatness needs to run close to 3 hours, add or subtract. Once the film ends, you get out of the theater and realize, it's NEARLY 1AM. WTF? Now during those almost three hours of trying to pay attention to what's going on in the film, I am being distracted by people eating shit, unwrapping edible shit, going out to buy more shit to eat, people talking to each other loudly, and people going in and out to the restroom like all the time. And then the movie studious or distributors are wondering why so many people don't like to see film on the big screen.
Re: Going to a movie theater is such an ordeal (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
My only choice for a cinema that doesn't show 20 minutes of ads is the IMAX (not a cinema with IMAX technology, a full-on laser projection frequency multiplexed 3D, giant screen IMAX cinema). It's far too expensive to go regularly, and the selection of films is very limited.
Re: (Score:1)
My choice to miss 20 minutes of ads is to go to the 12:30 movie at 12:50, sit down, and watch the show start. Works almost every time. There's 3 movies in town, so selling out is fairly rare. Selling out the 1st movie of the day, say 12:30 PM, is really rare. Yeah, I'm retired and can do that. OTOH, I _do_ go about half an hour before the commercials start, as I rather enjoy being away from everything. Finish up my Words-with-Friends for the day, check the email, and then watch the ads. Hey, some
Re: (Score:2)
Unfortunately I don't think we are going to be able to avoid the 20 minutes of commercials before the stream starts.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Unfortunately I don't think we are going to be able to avoid the 20 minutes of commercials before the stream starts.
As someone else posted, you can use a strategy many of us use... buy your ticket (hopefully in pre-allocated seat) and just turn up 20min after start time.
Re:Going to a movie theater is such an ordeal (Score:4, Funny)
I am being distracted by people eating shit, unwrapping edible shit, going out to buy more shit to eat
When did they start catering to coprophages? Jeez, I can't even get a lousy beer at the theater.
Re: (Score:2)
I am being distracted by people eating shit, unwrapping edible shit, going out to buy more shit to eat
When did they start catering to coprophages? Jeez, I can't even get a lousy beer at the theater.
Why would you want lousy beer? Just buy a good beer.. (unless you live in a repressive hellhole of a country that doesn't allow that in cinemas)
Re: (Score:2)
Having to wait in the foyer while the previous audience is cleared out. Since they split one big cinema into four, you get to watch one movie while listening to the other three. Then when the movie is finished being bum-rushed out of the place to make room for the next audience. (I like reading the credits). Finally, being forced to buy stale confectionary, over-priced pop-corn and cola as they won't sell you a cola on its own.
Re: (Score:2)
Why go there at night time? It costs more, has more people, etc. I just go there in the morning hours especially on weekdays when possible. Also, go to a good theater with reserved seats with no annoying ads. (not movie trailers).
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I bet he hasn't been to a theater since the Bush administration. Maybe Clinton administration.
No longer any point to it (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: No longer any point to it (Score:4, Insightful)
Yeah, we know all about those who make movies into a social activity. They're the ones jabbering non-stop throughout the movie, making the rest of us want to strangle them in their sleep. Sure, the whole setup around going to a movie can be a social event but unless you're trying to snuggle up to a date I find the actual movie-watching to be relatively solitary and something that could well be replaced by some actually social activity. P.S. Humble-bragging about cooking better than professional chefs probably says more about where you go out to eat than your cooking.
Re: (Score:3)
The paradox of cinema: The only reason to go is to be social, but if you want to be social you cannot go. Either way, the cinema is pointless unless you really want to see a just-released film early on.
Re: (Score:2)
If you want to get out, then get a beer with friends. The only reason why I would go to a theater is to watch a movie I want to see before its release on other platforms. The screen quality is no longer a big argument (my TV at home is good enough to me), I don't care about THX and .. well I have kids.
All in all, the argument is that theaters serves a purpose that's reducing, and the exclusivity they have for certain period is not all that's left, but close. If that exclusivity goes away, it might be the e
American cinemas VS e.g. German cinemas. (Score:1)
I don't like that because American cinema managers fail to keep the idiots out and their cinemas clean, which caused Americans to dislike the cinema experience, ... grab the opportunity, and start a *nice* cinema too?
German cinemas, with are clean and nice and where people are quiet, will now receive a stoning aswell.
Can't you just
Then again it's more than a decade since I was last interested in any of that Hollywood crap. Only Nazi Übersoldat (translation: superhero) propaganda, US edition, and trash
Cinemas around me are fine (Score:3)
Sounds more like the theaters (and maybe people) in your part of the country suck. Where I live my theaters are always clean and I never have problems with noise disturbances. I probably go to 2-3 movies a year and I can't even think of the last negative experience I've had going to one.
I do remember the theaters around here (I still live in the town I grew up in) were gross when I was a child in the 80's with sticky floors and all that. Since the 90's though our theaters have all been quite nice.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe the German cinema owners should simply start their own movie studio. Although I fear Americans would hate their movies. ;)
Hans Gruber would get to shove John McClane out the window in the reboot.
Studios need to realize, however...... (Score:5, Insightful)
I think once things have settled down and we can start going back to normal, I don't expect that direct to streaming movies are going to be as successful as they are at the moment. While I know there's clearly a market for it, speaking for myself, when I go to the theater, I am going for the experience that the theater will offer which I cannot replicate at home, even though I actually do have a fairly large TV with surround sound in my living room. And if I'm going to have to pay to stream it anyways, I might as well just wait and buy the DVD when that's available because the experience will be the same.
Re: (Score:2)
At some point releases won't go to DVD and BD. It will be streaming only for home watching.
Re: (Score:2)
At which point I shall likely stop buying movies altogether.
Not that I expect that will make the slightest difference... but I buy DVDs because I want to *own* them, not because I want to rent them until the streaming service decides not to carry it anymore.
Re: (Score:2)
Yep, and the rich people have DMR in their homes already.
Re: (Score:1)
Theater model is (mostly) broken anyway (Score:3, Interesting)
There used to, a LONG time ago, be a compelling reason to go to the theater. It was a reasonably priced way to see a feature film on a big bright screen, with great audio, and readily available tasty snacks. There was an air of excitement. People were smiling. It was fun!
Today you go to the theater simply because you don't want to wait to see the film. The theaters have a dark and dingy feel. Some smell like mildew (maybe just here, we've had a few hurricanes and floods). A tub of popcorn and a drink is almost as pricey as a new car. Staff are barely awake. You now go begrudgingly, rather than getting excited to go. Home theaters now have certainly good enough quality to enjoy the movie, and buffs probably have just as good a setup as the theater does. So other than "I don't want to wait" what do theaters have to offer?
The only theaters I've seen innovating, and this is definitely where we go, is a place like Studio Movie Grill or Star Cinema where you can get real food, real drinks, table service, and the place doesn't smell like an old shoe. Their model is so significantly different, we find ourselves again choosing to go to the theater first and checking out which film second. It's more along the lines of "lets get dinner and a couple drinks and be entertained for a couple hours while we're at it." It's great for a quick night out. I can spend $50 or $60 at AMC and leave feeling like I spent a lot of money and not be very happy about it. Or I can go to one of the other places, spend $100+ but leave feeling like I got something for my money.
So for AMC to dig their heels against Universal? Good luck with that, they're likely digging their own grave.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not just the cinema getting any worse: It's the alternative getting better. We've gone from tiny, low-resolution CRTs to big DLPs to giant flat screens showing HD videos. Throw in some good speakers - perfectly affordable consumer technology - and you've got a home cinema: A viewing experience every bit as good as the cinema can provide. The difference in experience between what the home viewer could afford and what the cinema could provide has narrowed.
The next logical step (Score:4, Interesting)
Theatres dying would be sad (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't care how huge a TV set you buy, it's never the same as going to a movie theatre, and never will, not even if you were hideously rich and had a movie theatre built inside your house.
It doesn't need to be. I can watch it on my 720p or 1080i TV with a soundbar and not leave the house, start the film whenever is convenient for me - not at a time dictated by the theatre, pause it whenever I want to use the bathroom, and not spend a fortune on a drink and something to eat.
If you still want to go to a theatre because you think it's a superior experience, by all means, have a blast - but not all of us agree and should be shoehorned in to your way of watching a movie.
Re: (Score:1)
I watched 2001: A Space Odyssey last year, and there is absolutely no way you're going to experience that at home. In the theater, it was grand. I have a great stereo at home, but I'd never reproduce that audio. And of course the size of the screen is grand, this was the IMAX theater, and I don't have to be 5 feet from a 100 inch screen to fill my peripherals.
Otherwise, the movie theater has many advantages. Nobody's going to come into the room and start talking to you, screwing up your immersion. Th
Re: (Score:2)
So, what will AMC do? (Score:2)
Will they simply quit playing Western made movies and go to Chinese made only? After all, AMC is a Chinese owned company.
Government caused the problem (Score:2)
Cinemas validity (Score:1)
Great New Model (Score:1)
On-Demands Today, On The Pirate Bay Tomorrow.
ads (Score:2)
But won't the streaming services force us to watch annoying ads in order to view their content?
Oh wait...
I hate going to the movies. Maybe I'm just old. I hate picking out my seats ahead of time, I hate the annoying kids running around the lobby, I hate the drunks in the theater, i hate the 45 minutes of ads, I hate the people on their cell phones, I hate the stupid kids sneaking in halfway through from another theater that wont shut up and sit down, I hate $13 popcorn and $5 pop, and I hate being out of