Soviet TV Version of Lord of the Rings Rediscovered After 30 Years (theguardian.com) 64
A Soviet television adaptation of The Lord of the Rings thought to have been lost to time was rediscovered and posted on YouTube last week, delighting Russian-language fans of JRR Tolkien. From a report: The 1991 made-for-TV film, Khraniteli, based on Tolkien's The Fellowship of the Ring, is the only adaptation of his Lord of the Rings trilogy believed to have been made in the Soviet Union. Aired 10 years before the release of the first instalment of Peter Jackson's movie trilogy, the low-budget film appears ripped from another age: the costumes and sets are rudimentary, the special effects are ludicrous, and many of the scenes look more like a theatre production than a feature-length film. The score, composed by Andrei Romanov of the rock band Akvarium, also lends a distinctly Soviet ambience to the production, which was reportedly aired just once on television before disappearing into the archives of Leningrad Television. Few knew about its existence until Leningrad Television's successor, 5TV, abruptly posted the film to YouTube last week [part one | part two], where it has gained almost 400,000 views within several days.
Re: (Score:2)
Reminds me of this... (Score:3)
Reminds me of this: Worker & Parasite [youtu.be].
Re: (Score:2)
One of my all time favorite Simpsons bits!
Re: (Score:2)
I can't help you with that but here's Milne's Winnie the Pooh [youtube.com].
Thank you - that is WAY better than the Lord of the Rings from the story.
Re: (Score:2)
Sure, just was Vlad Putin on tv
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Then maybe Comrade Detective [youtube.com] is for you.
Re: (Score:2)
Great idea, great casting, great acting, didn't quite jell for me. But I'm ok with the time it took to watch it, which is pretty much all you can say for entertainment.
Re: (Score:2)
It was too long, I think.
Re: (Score:2)
In Soviet Russia (Score:5, Funny)
Wait... Bugger.
Re: (Score:2)
Their version of Gollum is just golden.
I do not even know why they have a giant at a table with a Hobbit, was that a part I missed?
Re: (Score:2)
That's Tom Bombadil. [youtu.be]
Re: (Score:2)
Why Bombadil as a giant? I read all the Tolkien I could get my hands on and do not remember him as a giant?
Re: (Score:1)
He's probably 'normal human'â"sized and thus big compared to the hobbits.
Just inconsistent effects.
Re: (Score:2)
"Wait... Bugger."
Dildo or Frito?
Romanov (Score:2)
Sad what the Bolsheviks did to the Czar, he has been forced to make B-movies for late night television. Going from owning a collection of Faberge eggs to having to direct TV versions of second rate childrenâ(TM)s stories is sad.
Vladimir Putin (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Vladimir Putin (Score:5, Funny)
...and he didn't even need makeup!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Past tense?
Stage play, aye. (Score:5, Informative)
One of the comments on part 1 confirm the theatre stage play angle:
"To the foreign people in the comments - It is a theater stage play recorded in the format of tv film. Such kind of format was popular in Soviet Union."
Re: (Score:2)
That even this was recorded is almsot a minor miracle. At this point in history the USSR was more or less a failed state, rapidly crumbling from financing an arms race against the americans it had no hope of succeeding in.
About a year after this, the wall fell. The rest as they say, is history.
Re: (Score:2)
At least that would explain them filming corrupting Western works.
Re: (Score:2)
There was a Finnish Hobbit mini series in '93, which had production values above a stage play, but dismal by Hollywood standards. Wasn't bad what I saw but it vanished from youtube before I got far.
Re: (Score:2)
I saw a version by Ralph Bakshi, it was not possible to get high enough to enjoy it
Re: (Score:2)
Hobitit (The Hobbits, 1993) Mini Series, All 9 Episodes [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:1)
With Sir Ian McKellen (Score:2)
Amazingly, a Sir Ian McKellen lookalike plays a hobbit, and there's a Stephen Fry lookalike doing the narration. The production seems to run on almost zero budget, good for a few laughs.
If you are interested in more Soviet stuff, I suggest a look at the 1986 Kin-Dza-Dza!, which is intentionally funny (a comedy), but with a low budget has really good effects and a very interesting look & story.
Cheesy, but features Old Man Willow and Bombadil (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Did they read the Books at least once? If yes, they have a huge advantage over Peter Jackson right there.
Re: (Score:2)
Were you able to find subtitles
Re: (Score:1)
With Tom Bombadil (Score:2)
Voiceover/subtitles? (Score:1)
Jules Bass and Arthur Rankin sigh in relief. (Score:2)
"Well, at least we didn't do the worst version of The Lord of the Rings!"
*Yeah, I know Rankin is dead. His shade sighed in relief...
Re: (Score:1)
Did Sauron win? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There was a post-Soviet Russian novel about the Orcs being the good guys in an industrial society, always being oppressed by elves. "The Last Ringbearer." Probably reflects somewhat the Soviet era view (possibly North Korea view) of being high oppressed by the evil empires of America, Europe, etc.
Re: (Score:1)
Now that is a curious interpretation of "The Last Ringbearer".
In my opinion it's mostly pro-scientific as opposed to magical thinking.
Budget (Score:2)
I skimmed through it. Most of the scenes look very cramped like it was filmed in a closet. What the hell man, Russia has the most land of any country and they had to film most if not all of it (including outdoor scenes) in a closet? The blue screen scenes -- many of which were just outdoor shots .. look terrible. Couldn't the KGB steal western blue screen technology or maybe they could have asked for it on a humanitarian basis I'm sure we would have obliged. Only the costumes seem like somebody put some car
Re: Budget (Score:4, Interesting)
In 1989 when Americans were enjoying cordless telephones, cable and satellite TVs, and cars with keyless entry and automatic transmission, my university-educated professional parents' apartment in the capital of Ukraine had a single rotary dial telephone shared on a party line, a single tube television that recieved at most 8 channels, and (in a ratity), my father owned an automobile...with a manual transmission, no rear differential and a backup hand crank in case the battery discharged after sitting too long and couldn't get the engine to turn over.
No matter how much space or mineral wealth or arable land there was, the place was a shithole country up and down.
Re: (Score:3)
In the UK during 1989 it was more like the Ukraine in terms of technology than the US - rotary phones were still very much a feature, although party lines were less so and touch tone phones were starting to come in, satellite was something for rich people, everyone else had to make do with BBC 1, BBC 2, ITV and Channel 4 (I didn't know one person with either cable or satellite growing up, no one at my school had either). We got Channel 5 in the late 1990s. Keyless entry cars were something for the extreme
Re: Budget (Score:2)
Different places adopted different consumer technologies differently I suppose. But to say Western Europeans prefer manuals now and back then doesn't erase the fact that those sporty manuals don't need hand cranks, or batteries that require the owner to top them off every few months.
To be sure, sealed batteries didn't materialize overnight and most people carry jumper cables in their cars, but I have never used mine in 14 years of owning my car and can count on one hand the number of times I've seen them us
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe the USA was like that, but the rest of "the West" wasn't. Rotary dial phones, manual transmissions, and, where I lived, TWO TV channels...
But many of those trappings of 80s affluence were crap anyway. Early cordless phones had interference, short battery life, and were trivially easy to eavesdrop on (OK, maybe not quite as easy as a party line phone!). 80s automatic transmissions were woeful. Etc... Maybe your university educated professional parents just decided not to pay the "early adopters" penalt
Re: Budget (Score:2)
The metro and the trolley cars were quite nice. It was built as a communist vanity project. Not as ornate as the moscow metro but on par with the dc metro in aesthetics.
Food availability was poor by Western standards. Not starvation (at least not in my day, but before then...), but much less variety, much more seasonality, and much less convenience. Separate shops for dairy, butcher, baker, vegetables, dry goods. Long lines. Without a free market to tickle it, there was no incentive to make convenience fron
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
No matter how much space or mineral wealth or arable land there was, the place was a shithole country up and down.
Working in IT I get to meet lots of former Eastern Bloc citizens who have since immigrated or their children, and the story is exactly the same every_single_time. Whether Ukraine, Poland, Czech, Hungary etc Socialism brought inhuman conditions on millions and millions on of people, why do the American Left just pretend this never happened? Why do they chase this with such ignorance?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
TV-play (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Still, we had Kin-Dza-Dza. It was possible, but only with great effort, and, generally, not in central Russia. cf. https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Wow, that is incredibly bad. (Score:3)
It's really bad.
It's amazingly, mind-numbingly bad.
It's one of the worst things I've ever seen.
It's so bad, that is just might end up being a classic.
Re: (Score:2)
It's so bad, that is just might end up being a classic.
For some perhaps, but not others. You may watch "Plan 9 from Outer Space" and find it so bad that it's good. Or you may find it simply bad. A waste of time that you will never get back.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The fireworks were pretty spectacular (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
re: (Score:1)