'Super Mario Bros. Movie' Tops $1 Billion Globally, Highest-Grosser Ever For a Film Based on a Video Game (variety.com) 58
"The Super Mario Bros. Movie" is officially the first film of the year to cross the coveted $1 billion milestone at the global box office. From a report: As of Sunday, after 26 days of release, the animated video game adaptation, from Universal, Illumination and Nintendo, has grossed $490 million in North America and $532 million internationallly. It's only the fifth movie of pandemic times to join the $1 billion club, following "Spider-Man: No Way Home," "Top Gun: Maverick," "Jurassic World Dominion" and "Avatar: The Way of Water."
"The Super Mario Bros. Movie" opened in theaters on April 5 and generated a towering $204 million in its first five days of release, notching the biggest opening weekend of the year and the second-biggest debut ever for an animated movie. Since then, it has become the highest grossing movie domestically and globally of 2023, as well as the highest-grosser ever for a film based on a video game. Those records are especially encouraging because the last time that Mario and Luigi graced the big screen, in 1993's disastrous live-action "Super Mario Bros," became a legendary example of Hollywood's inability to adapt video games.
"The Super Mario Bros. Movie" opened in theaters on April 5 and generated a towering $204 million in its first five days of release, notching the biggest opening weekend of the year and the second-biggest debut ever for an animated movie. Since then, it has become the highest grossing movie domestically and globally of 2023, as well as the highest-grosser ever for a film based on a video game. Those records are especially encouraging because the last time that Mario and Luigi graced the big screen, in 1993's disastrous live-action "Super Mario Bros," became a legendary example of Hollywood's inability to adapt video games.
cool (Score:2)
Cool, now adjust the stats for inflation.
Re: (Score:2)
Nothing tops Gone with the Wind just yet but this will crack top 20 or even top 10 maybe after inflation
https://www.boxofficemojo.com/... [boxofficemojo.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Heh-I read that as "..top Guns with the Wind"
Re: (Score:3)
A Hollywood executive is going to read this comment and then youll feel silly when you see the trailer in a couple years
Inflation adjusted numbers (Score:3)
Even after adjusting for inflation, any movie that makes over a billion would still be in the top 20 of all time.
Rank / Title / Adjusted Lifetime Gross
1 Gone with the Wind $1,895,421,694
2 Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope $1,668,979,715
3 The Sound of Music $1,335,086,324
4 E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial $1,329,174,791
5 Titanic $1,270,101,626
6 The Ten Commandments $1,227,470,000
7 Jaws $1,200,856,389
8 Doctor Zhivago $1,163,149,635
9 The Exorcist $1,036,314
Re: (Score:2)
Interestingly, the number one spot is held by one of the oldest films on the list; Gone with the Wind came out in 1939. Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs was 1937. After that, you have to go down to The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse (1927) at 137 to find something that old. No film from this century made the top ten--The Force Awakens is the highest-ranking film from the 21st century.
Re: (Score:1)
Interestingly, the number one spot is held by one of the oldest films on the list; Gone with the Wind came out in 1939. Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs was 1937. After that, you have to go down to The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse (1927) at 137 to find something that old. No film from this century made the top ten--The Force Awakens is the highest-ranking film from the 21st century.
Remember, this is adjusted lifetime gross, so not surprising to find movies that have existed for 70 years more than their competitors to have made more, especially as there have been Betamax, VHS, probably Laserdisc, DVD, maybe HD-DVD, and Bluray versions of, "Gone with the Wind," not to mention streaming and downloads. And I'm sure there are people who have bought it multiple times.
Re: (Score:2)
Also the ticket sales numbers paint the picture also, with GWTW pulling a bonkers 202M compared to as you said, the much more recent TFW with a mere 108M
Guess you "had to be there" but GWTW really was a phenomenon
Re: (Score:2)
I certainly wasn't there but I'd guess it's down to there being much less competition for entertainment in 1939.
I thought the ticket prices would've gone down (after adjustment) but that's not the case, they were $0.23 in 1939, which would be around $5 now, vs $10 or so that they actually cost now. https://www.theatlantic.com/bu... [theatlantic.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You have to realize the landscape of entertainment today and yesterday are very different from each other.
In 1937, you were i
Re: (Score:2)
In terms of a market of eyeballs think of a world population of a little over 2 billion in the 1930's versus nearly 8 billion today should give modern films an advantage on these sorts of box office record lists. So I think there is a fair amount going on beyond inflation, number of movie goers, and there not being anything better to do back then than watch the same film a dozen times.
Re: (Score:3)
Population is way higher now so ticket sales is not a fair comparison even after inflation. Access to movies worldwide is also much higher today as are translated versions. People now consume more media than is even healthy or wise. More options doesn't diffuse things a great deal; word of mouth and marketing are better today as well.
Long term reruns brings in some money over time; however, I doubt the modern movies have much replay value in comparison...
Re: (Score:1)
That's all we really want - stop trying to hijack our pre-teens mind's. I'm glad you agree.
Re: (Score:2)
If a movie can hijack someone's mind then we're all in trouble. More like this movie disagrees with my opinion and makes me scared.
Re: (Score:2)
In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
They just made a story, not preaching an agenda.
If you're always looking for an agenda, then you're certain to find one.
How would you rate these movies on the woke scale?
1) Tootsie https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0... [imdb.com]
2) Dog Day Afternoon https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0... [imdb.com]
3) Midnight Cowboy https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0... [imdb.com]
4) To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0... [imdb.com]
5) The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0... [imdb.com]
Re: (Score:3)
If you're always looking for an agenda, then you're certain to find one.
How would you rate these movies on the woke scale?
There are terrible movies and then there is the next level sewage in ArchieBunker's collection.
Re: (Score:2)
The first three in the list are all Oscar winners, Midnight Cowboy for best picture.
I beg to disagree (Score:3)
Sell more Nintendo consoles and Mario games.
And honestly, that agenda works for me. If the rumored Switch 2 comes out this year, I'll probably buy it.
Re: (Score:2)
But they only want our kids' money, they don't want them to think, only to spend. That's fine.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Think of it as a long term investment to get people to think that your products are in general the best and that trust being put in you is well placed. That pays off with interest in the long run because you don't have to hawk your crap one by one, people will actually go out of their way to find out whether you have any new crap they MUST have NOW.
For reference, see Apple. Or any computer game franchise for that matter.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
its no even a good movie....
predictable story line - and having to shoehorning game play of jumping on blocks where it obviously wasn't needed...
take that out - just another boring movie...
Take that all out and it's not a Mario Bro movie
Re: (Score:2)
I was just telling my wife last night that I know it's not going to be very good, but I kind of want to see it anyway because Mario. I played Mario games growing up and kids are still playing Mario now. There's a lot of cross-generational appeal for this one and a lot of international appeal (less than half of the box office gross is domestic). There's just a lot of fondness for the characters and that's what allows them to make a lot of money, even if the quality of the story is meh.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not very good, but it's still entertaining. The story is incredibly stupid. You'd expect it to be Mario goes on an adventure to rescue Princess Peach from Browser, as that's the generic story in the majority of Mario games, but it isn't. I guess I won't really spoil things other than point out that Donkey Kong is voiced by Seth Rogan so you already know he's involved, which doesn't really make sense with the "Mario canon," such as it exists.
Instead, it's just 90 minutes of Mario references. Pretty much
Re: (Score:3)
I recently watched it with my pre-teen kid. The kid LOVED it. And then I realized why I didn't like the Phantom Menace: I wasn't the target age for it when it came out.
This movie strikes me as that kind of movie. The story may be lacking as many are saying, but for it's target audience, particularly as Nintendo has always skewed younger than competing consoles and franchises? This movie quite honestly feels
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting example. I saw Phantom Menace when I was in elementary school or middle school and thought it was really great. But by the time I was in my 20s, I couldn't enjoy any of the prequel trilogy.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
This! I HATED the new star wars movies. I saw Episode 7 and it felt like a really bad rehash of episode 4. I enjoyed 1-3 but they were not as good as 4-6.
I read something the other day about the amount of kids today that LOVE episode 7 and it clicked in my head. Of course they did. It was geared towards them.
As I get older, I'm realizing more and more things are not being geared towards me in any way, shape or form. It's somewhat odd because I have disposable income and would love something to be so awesome
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
On the other hand though the original trilogy appealed to all ages. It wasn't just something that appealed to children which is why they are considered actually good movies.
I mean, when I was a kid I was very firmly of the opinion that the movie Monster Squad https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0... [imdb.com] was an amazing movie. That doesn't mean it was actually any good.
Re: (Score:2)
Kids love The Force Awakens because they aren't comparing it to nostalgic memories of the earlier movies. They take it at face value, and it's not a bad movie by any means.
Last Jedi is probably top 2-3 Star Wars movies ever made, with Rogue One being another. The main issue with the prequels is that they portrayed the Jedi as uncaring bastards, responsible for driving Anakin to the Dark Side. That really was crapping on the legacy of the original movies, if you care about that.
Loosely based on a very popular video game (Score:2)
Because its not "based" on the game (Score:1)
It's not so much based on a game, as based in the game(s) Universe. And its a good story, that even those non gamers can enjoy. Well done.
Re: (Score:2)
Hollywood has been notorious for a very long time in not respecting source material. They do it to books all the time as well. Just completely trash the story line, skin it and wear it as a skin suit.
This is why Super Hornio Brothers [youtube.com] is the only video game adaptation I can watch.
formulaic family movie (Score:4, Informative)
I took the kids to see it. It was exactly what you would expect from a modern animated family movie. Parts of the storyline are straight out of Shrek (adventure with uninvited sidekick). We enjoyed it but it was not memorable.
Re: (Score:3)
I took the kids to see it. It was exactly what you would expect from a modern animated family movie. Parts of the storyline are straight out of Shrek (adventure with uninvited sidekick). We enjoyed it but it was not memorable.
It was safe and it did what fans wanted: it stuck pretty close to the source material. There's definitely room the improve on the humor; maybe Nintendo will lengthen the leash on the sequel.
Re: (Score:3)
Nintendo views Mario as a franchise for young children. It's as family friendly as you can possibly imagine, even tamer than Disney these days. This movie was written for under 10s to enjoy.
A lot of older people enjoy Mario games too, having grown up with them. Actually I didn't have a NES or SNES when growing up, by Mario Maker got me into the games about 5 years ago. For adults it's mostly user-generated content, like ROM hacks and more difficult Mario Maker courses. Nintendo doesn't do much for us.
Re: (Score:2)
A good kids movie (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:A good kids movie (Score:4, Insightful)
It's a movie for under 10s. To them every joke is fresh.
It's interesting how the outrage merchants had to do a 180 on this one. Before release they were saying that the movie would bomb because it was too "woke". Princess Peach is no longer a damsel in distress, she is a girlboss and Mario is the incompetent bumbling idiot. As if that's something exceptional, and not the formula for every adventure movie in the last 20 years.
Then it came out and was incredibly successful, so they had to u-turn and say its popularity was because it isn't woke. No LGBT characters, no moral messages, no Mary Sue characters.
In reality it's just a very simple, and very competent movie. Nintendo never does anything controversial, at least not intentionally. Being a movie for under 10s, you could understand what's happening even with the sound muted. And that's fine, there is a place for that kind of entertainment and it's enjoyable.
Movie plots (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I really do Marvel at the low lows they've reached.
I don't think it was a video game as much (Score:2)
I've never played a single game of Mario anything and yet went to see it just because it looked fun, not some gloomy, angst-ridden voyage of shallow self-discovery.
Re: (Score:2)
That is a great description for a great many modern movies:
gloomy, angst-ridden voyage of shallow self-discovery
Will they release the other movies now? (Score:2)
Nintendo is notorious for holding rights to movies that are fully produced, but not released. Good examples are the live action movies. Only one of them "Super Mario Brothers" got properly released. The other 2, "Super Hornio Brothers" and "Super Hornio Brothers 2", only got a limited release on VHS, and are hidden away by Nintendo since then.
Now with the movie they _did_ release gaining them a billion, they might re-consider releasing the other movies they have.
One billion? (Score:2)
Eat your heart out, Uwe Boll!
Oh, it sounds awesome (Score:1)