Ultrawide Monitors Remind Us There's Still Much To Learn About OLED Burn-in 47
OLED monitors risk burn-in, especially with static images. Newer models combat this using improved materials, algorithms, efficiencies, features, and heat management. However, long-term data is minimal as quality selection is recent. An unexpected quirk applies to ultrawides: playing 16:9 content creates brighter center areas versus darker sides, quickening OLED degradation. In an extreme test by RTINGS, Samsung ultrawides developed heavy differential wear in just 700 hours. ArsTechnica adds: Even OLED monitors that have already been released can see their capabilities change in a way that could impact burn-in risk. For example, the Odyssey G8 monitor got a firmware update in August that removed the ability to use the Peak Brightness setting in SDR mode. While this is just one specific mode that, again, some users might not use, it's worth noting how this could change the amount of wear an OLED monitor could see. RTINGS' review said that after the firmware update, the monitor's max luminance "when displaying a bright highlight in an SDR scene" went from 331 nits to 230 nits. Samsung hasn't confirmed the reasons for this change, but such changes highlight how OLED monitor burn-in risk can change from use to use and from update to update, across different products.
Fuck the 1% (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Don't fuck them. Just kill and eat them. It's all they're good for.
In fact, we should kill and eat everyone worth more than us. Everyone should. Especially the 60% of the planet that is poorer than us.... oh, wait....
Re: (Score:2)
Win Win
Re: (Score:1)
Hint: you are the 1%.
Re: (Score:2)
Lmao, I love when raw hard facts get modded down.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Google yourself vs the globe. If you're not the 1% or really god damned close yet live in a western nation and have tech skills then you've made some seriously bad personal decisions along the way.
Re: (Score:2)
I DONT FUCKING LIVE THERE
Re: (Score:2)
You don't have to care. Your feelings are irrelevant. But you're still a 1%er if you have a techie job in the west.
You're just missing the fact that 99% of the planet lives a more miserable existence than you. You literally have first world problems.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
lol, I don't know him but I know people who do and they've talked. You definitely don't want to know where he's been if their stories are true.
Re: (Score:2)
He has ten kids (one deceased), and rarely stays with one woman long enough to have more than one, so we do know some of the answers to "where he's been".
Re: (Score:2)
Yup, that's just the beginning. I'd share their stories but the last thing I need is for a trigger happy billionaire to decide I'm going to be this week's example. You're definitely on the right path. Just keep going.
Re: (Score:2)
...so he bought Twitter and changed the name to X, which gives him the right to sexually harass anyone on the platform as he chooses? "It's called X for a reason, you twit."
Re: (Score:2)
I'm talking about his real life activity. Not Twitter silliness online.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
their
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Try Alabama public schools, '75-'86.
Screensavers are back baby! (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
If only. Recently, I tried getting the original After Dark working on my Linux machine, and using DosBox, it works pretty well, but only when I'm logged in and active; I can't get it working on the lock screen. I've googled how to fix it, but I have yet to find a page that has a good solution.
I think it would be pretty hilarious to get Totally Twisted working on my machine at work.
Re: (Score:2)
OLED gets persisted images because the pixels wear out during use. A typical screensaver will not help here as it is just more "use". The way to "undo" the wear is actually just to level out the remaining pixels to a similar wear level.
This is entirely a game of avoiding wear in the first place whenever possible (pixel shift), making the wear as uniform as possible (full-panel maintenance refresh), followed by being leaving some voltage buffer to boost the brightness of worn pixels to match original levels
Re: (Score:2)
I still use screen savers because they're fun! :D
Re: (Score:2)
Know your needs. (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
TFT panels (TN/VA/IPS) can suffer from ima
Re: Know your needs. (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I could never make an OLED work for me
People said the same about LCD. Talking about a singular technology is silly. You can't make the current generation and type of OLED panels on the market work for you. Never say never about any technology under continuous development.
Re: (Score:2)
There is an LCD technology that can rival OLED for deep blacks and colour accuracy, but it's very expensive. Sony do some reference monitors that use it. Basically two LCD panels, one which is monochrome and a colour one in front of it. The monochrome LCD helps increase the range of luminance possible.
Unfortunately it's a massive power hog, because the backlight has to be extremely bright.
So in the end, if you want extremely good blacks and accurate colours, one of the OLED types (like QD OLED for example)
Re: (Score:2)
I had a pair of VA panels for a very long time (2048x1152 displays basically became impossible to replace), and they exhibited what appeared to be "burn-in" but it was temporary. Give them an hour without the signal that was causing the problem, and the differences gradually disappeared. After more than a decade of use, it was the "front end" that went out on both, a few months apart. They just failed to decode incoming signals any longer, and it was evident over the last couple months of function that some
OLED is not good if you're OCD (Score:2)
My launch day iPhone 13 mini has some burn in when I display solid color test images. Like that old joke where where a man tells his doctor "It hurts when I do this", just don't do that if it bothers you.
During day-to-day actual use, I've never noticed the burn-in. In TFA, I'm having difficulty seeing what they're complaining about even after they blew out the contrast in the image of that woman in the dark, to supposedly make the burn-in more noticeable. Yeah, you can certainly see it in the test images
Re: (Score:2)
My Google Pixel 3 Pro had to be replaced by Google (nice of them - it was like 2 months out of warranty) because the battery decided to change occupations and become a spicy pillow.
The replacement Pixel 3 Pro had screen burn in - it was the exact same circular pattern as the recovery mode animation. You did
If you want things to last... (Score:2)
... do not be an early adopter. Kind of obvious, that.
Re: (Score:2)
NOLED for me (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
OLED is vastly superior. Particularly in the case of HDR content showing a bright object moving against a black background, and you can watch the fucking illumination squares following and trailing it.
Burn-in is a problem with OLED panels, but various levels of mitigation strategies work well.
These ultrawides present a new problem that their manufacturers are going to have to figure out.
I have no burn-in problems with an
Re: (Score:2)
Ha! That's why I use a 14" orange phosphor CRT with a Hercules graphics card!
320x200 FTW!!
Re: (Score:2)
Hercules graphics was 720x348 (or in text mode with 9x14 glyphs on a 80x25 screen = 720x350 px.)
Turn in your geek card. [tech-insider.org] =P
I have had (Score:1)
Meaning is recent as selection is minimal (Score:2)
OLED is dumb (Score:3)
We need microLED asap.
Re: (Score:2)
We need Super Turbo Ultra MicroLED, asaper.
Re: (Score:2)
uLED panels already exist. They cost money, though.
Re: (Score:2)
Doesn't MicroLED have burn in as well? Fundamentally, anything where each pixel is lit individually, is going to experience different levels of wear depending on the content displayed. LEDs do fade over time.
Quality control issues across the board (Score:2)
The only thing that is clear at this point is that there is an insane quality control variance across the board of displays. There are OLEDs that report burn-in in very few hours. There are those which appear to be working fine after an insanely long continuous use making you wonder if it burn-in is a problem at all. Then there's this story here which seems to be related to a design defect on a specific type of display.
Nothing is certain about the technology in general. Anyone saying "OLED" is bad and can n
I still don't have a use for the format. (Score:1)
I own three normal 4K monitors.
Arranged in portrait mode, and screen-merged.
I still spend an appreciable amount of time READING on my computer.
I don't spend much time watching movies in widescreen.
If I DO, I have no objection to black bars (Hello! 6480 x3840!)
If I could get a high res-16x10 or 4x3 setup, I could die happy.
But the entire market's skewed towards these silly-scroll-fests.