Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
AI Music

CEO of AI Music Company Says People Don't Like Making Music 68

An anonymous reader quotes a report from 404 Media: Mikey Shulman, the CEO and founder of the AI music generator company Suno AI, thinks people don't enjoy making music. "We didn't just want to build a company that makes the current crop of creators 10 percent faster or makes it 10 percent easier to make music. If you want to impact the way a billion people experience music you have to build something for a billion people," Shulman said on the 20VC podcast. "And so that is first and foremost giving everybody the joys of creating music and this is a huge departure from how it is now. It's not really enjoyable to make music now [...] It takes a lot of time, it takes a lot of practice, you need to get really good at an instrument or really good at a piece of production software. I think the majority of people don't enjoy the majority of the time they spend making music."

Suno AI works like other popular generative AI tools, allowing users to generate music by writing text prompts describing the kind of music they want to hear. Also like many other generative AI tools, Suno was trained on heaps of copyrighted music it fed into its training dataset without consent, a practice Suno is currently being sued for by the recording industry. In the interview, Shulman says he's disappointed that the recording industry is suing his company because he believes Suno and other similar AI music generators will ultimately allow more people to make and enjoy music, which will only grow the audience and industry, benefiting everyone. That may end up being true, and could be compared to the history of electronic music, digital production tools, or any other technology that allowed more people to make more music.

CEO of AI Music Company Says People Don't Like Making Music

Comments Filter:
  • What a shithead. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by YetanotherUID ( 4004939 ) on Monday January 13, 2025 @05:43PM (#65086383)
    How fucking out of touch can these tech CEOs get.

    The vast majority of people who make music do it only for the fun of it, not for remuneration or recognition.
    • by bill_mcgonigle ( 4333 ) * on Monday January 13, 2025 @05:54PM (#65086407) Homepage Journal

      He doesn't understand that people will do hard work for a meaningful result.

      It's not necessary to have fun the whole time.

      The way dopamine works, in the natural sense, is that you get more reward for climbing a mountain to see the view than if you take a bus up.

      Music making is also a proxy for sexual selection fitness, in terms of ability signals.

      People get kudos for building a dining room table from boards, not buying one on Overstock.

      Women will swoon for a singer/songwriter, not a guy with a 'killer' Spotify playlist.

      • Re:What a shithead. (Score:5, Interesting)

        by Darinbob ( 1142669 ) on Monday January 13, 2025 @06:17PM (#65086465)

        People like writing music because it's a skill they have that they can use. May as well say "people don't like to juggle, so we'll make a juggling machine." No, people do like juggling, it's fun. People like creating, it's fun. That includes creating music - and it's not just making up spontaneous sounds that sort of work together, composing is not easy. Even Jazz with all its improvisation is NOT easy. It's like asking why people paint when they can just take a photo.

        • by Rei ( 128717 )

          There are tedious parts. I'd like some good AI mastering tools, for example. Get rid of these pops. Fix this seam. Stabilize this voice. Change this vowel to a different one. Etc.

          The worst for me is when I feel like I'm fighting against my tool. I've been going through that a lot with Cinelerra lately. I know, it's not an ideal tool for mastering and I'm kind of asking for problems, but still...

      • by Tablizer ( 95088 )

        The way dopamine works, in the natural sense, is that you get more reward for climbing a mountain to see the view than if you take a bus up.

        You insensitive clod, I like the bus! [youtube.com]

      • by mjwx ( 966435 )

        He doesn't understand that people will do hard work for a meaningful result.

        There in lies the problem. Making music requires hard work, dedication and a lot of failure. Most folk don't have the patience or dedication for it. I didn't, I can play the guitar but not to any level where I'd be comfortable playing in front of others... Most people don't even get that far. Along with being tone deaf, I also think a lot of people are tempo deaf too.

        Women will swoon for a singer/songwriter, not a guy with a 'killer' Spotify playlist.

        This... Unfortunately we've reduced music to a point where "everyone can be a musician" regardless of if they have any musical talent. Hence w

    • by Brain-Fu ( 1274756 ) on Monday January 13, 2025 @05:55PM (#65086413) Homepage Journal

      I suspect this notion that "people don't enjoy making music" isn't coming from someone who is so out-of-touch that they believe this, but rather, from someone who is so interested in making money that they want us to believe it.

      He wants to present his offering as something that is saving us unpleasant labor, not as something that is replacing us at something we like to do. It's just good marketing. Or at least an attempt at good marketing. So, that's the position he needs to take.

      It's still an outright ridiculous position to take. There will still be interest in live performances and obtaining music made by humans. And of course there will still be plenty of people interested in making music. Nobody is going to actually accept this silly notion that people don't like doing it.

      Just my suspicion though. I don' t know the guy. Maybe he really is this wrong.

      • by dstwins ( 167742 )
        In a strange way.. he's not entirely wrong..

        The reason singers and songwriters collaborate is a lot of people that sing/perform very well, can't write for shit.. (and ironically it goes the same in reverse where a lot of song writers are out of touch with singing/performing that they don't understand how it plays out in reality). There are a few singers that do their own dirty work (ie: write).. and they do it because writing is cathartic to them.. performing/singing is just for them, reading their diary al
    • It's auto-tune plus auto-compose, so what could possibly go wrong? But yes, in case you haven't noticed yet and are still a youngster, CEOs are never chosen for their job by being intelligent, insightful, or wise.

    • Re:What a shithead. (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Jahta ( 1141213 ) on Monday January 13, 2025 @06:18PM (#65086467)

      How fucking out of touch can these tech CEOs get. The vast majority of people who make music do it only for the fun of it, not for remuneration or recognition.

      Well, yes and no. Yes, the CEO is an idiot.

      But I think Gillian Welch [wikipedia.org] probably voices the view of the majority of musicians in this interview [theguardian.com] when she says:

      "... if you don’t enable musicians to make their living playing music, you won’t get to hear it. I am never going to stop playing music, but if I can’t make a living at it, then I will stop playing it outside my living room."

      • I don't see how there's any "but" about it. For every Gillian Welch, there are 10,000 musicians who never even make it past one or two open mic nights at their local bar. Just as for every athlete who can make a living playing sports, there are countless avocational athletes playing in local rec/amateur/beer leagues, not only for no pay, but often at significant personal expense.

        This guy claims to be making this software for "a billion people." That goes orders of magnitude beyond the reasonable scope of
        • Re: What a shithead. (Score:4, Interesting)

          by Bodrius ( 191265 ) on Monday January 13, 2025 @08:09PM (#65086713) Homepage

          He is not making a tool for a billion people to make music, he is making a tool for any "music creator" to reach a billion people... without going through the trouble of being a musician.

          If you take him at face value, he's not dumb or out of touch - his market is not the people who are making or enjoying music right now. Its business people who want to sell music - but wish they didn't have to hire and deal with "the talent".

          • He is not making a tool for a billion people to make music, he is making a tool for any "music creator" to reach a billion people... without going through the trouble of being a musician.

            If you take him at face value, he's not dumb or out of touch - his market is not the people who are making or enjoying music right now. Its business people who want to sell music - but wish they didn't have to hire and deal with "the talent".

            Except that's not taking him at face value at all He literally says in the quote in TFS:

            If you want to impact the way a billion people experience music you have to build something for a billion people," Shulman said on the 20VC podcast. "And so that is first and foremost giving everybody the joys of creating music "

            I know reading comprehension here on /. tends to suck donkey balls, but geez man, it's right there in black and white. Or are you just being disingenuous? The "billion" he's referring to are clearly the creators, not the consumers of the end product.

            Even if the second half of your post is true, which it very well may be in part, the whole point is that he wants to sell it to a billion creators. He wants to suckle fro

      • Key phrase in there is "outside my living room".

        She'll still create music, she just won't do the pitching to a music publisher, recording, etc part.

        Honestly, not endorsing his approach, but CEOs like this and the general culture they're a part of is why Luigi is so popular.

      • The real problem of music (and art, and writing) is that any new piece competes against millions of other contents that have been accumulating for decades. It's content post-scarcity, attention-scarce economy. This devalues any new work to the point that almost no creatives can make a living from royalties, and have to prostitute their art for advertising and attention grabbing.
    • No, you got it all wrong. What a fucking shithead!
    • by jythie ( 914043 )
      He really strikes me a hussle culture guy... nothing has value unless it is making you money so you can retire early, and the best way to make money is AI generated schlock, algorithmically designed to appeal to the largest most generic group possible since that is where money comes from.
    • Imagine that. I guess he's never heard of garage bands? Bar bands? A whole bunch of bands trying to strike it rich? Get discovered. We are in the age of idiocy.
    • The first thing you have to do is understand a dictionary definition of the word "fun". The CEO clearly doesn't understand it. For anybody reading my comment, quite seriously, try doing it yourself.
    • His target audience is music sellers not music lovers.

    • by AvitarX ( 172628 )

      Sure, but most people don't enjoy creating music (I assume this because most people (as in more than half, though music is a quite large hobby) have other hobbies).

      I don't think that being true means that all the sudden everyone is going to love making music because AI makes it easy.

      But it's also disingenuous to subset people to people that make music and then extrapolate that most people love making music (or feel compelled to however they feel about it).

    • Exactky. Yes I'd absolutely love to make a living doing it, and I'll fight tooth and nail for the right to make money doing it, I create music because I was fucking born to write music. Its all I think about and about 80% of what I spend my spare time on.

      "Dont enjoy making music" my arse. What an absolute knob gobbler this guy is. I hope the people who are suing him utterly bankerupt this motherfucker. I really do.

    • by Askmum ( 1038780 )
      You don't understand. He is catering for the vast group of talentless "creators" that only want to get rich fast. People with no ideas of their own who think having a video camera or a keyboard is all that it takes to get them to fame and financial excess. AI is the new religion. Mediocracy the new medium outcry.

      A better man with more talent than me once said

      But sometimes I think it's all over
      Sometimes I think it's all over
      No more Coltrane, no more Duke
      No more Monk, Jimi, Otis, Aretha or Sly
      And no one seems to stop and wonder why
      And I turn on the radio and it makes me wanna cry
      Because I know it's never gonna come around again
      And it makes me cry because I know that there's so many people
      Who'll never get to hear Mahalia Jackson, Mississippi Fred McDowell
      Lightning, Lemmon, Curtis, Marvin, and the Reverend Al Green
      The airways are clogged and it's not looking good
      In fact it's looking pretty mediocre out there
      But I digress

    • How fucking out of touch can these tech CEOs get.

      They aren't out of touch, they probably don't believe a word of what they say. Their literal job is to promote their companies, and spewing bullshit about why it's so awesome is right at the top of the job requirements.

  • I think he is taking a management perspective. No more annoying divas. Just tweak the music by ordering an AI around...
  • Really? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Savage-Rabbit ( 308260 ) on Monday January 13, 2025 @05:53PM (#65086405)

    CEO of AI Music Company Says People Don't Like Making Music

    Yet again one of these CEO types opens his mouth, says something and proves just how stupid the CEO class really is.

    • by Misagon ( 1135 )

      He does not have to be stupid, necessarily, he is just being condescending for the sake of being condescending.

    • by dstwins ( 167742 )
      No, just understand what management wants.. they want..... *drum roll kids*.

      MONEY!!!!

      That's it.. full stop.. Which means anything that speeds along the creation process and gets to the area THEY care about which is how many songs can that thing s churn out and even if its "crap".. if its crap people buy.. so what.. (its the "netflix effect" but for music).

      The netflix effect is where you flood the market on relatively mediocre movies and show.. (not necessarily bad... just not good).. but people don't care b
    • by jythie ( 914043 )
      Not stupid, just speaking to their audience. The kind of people who enjoy making music or other artistic expressions just don't matter in his world, so why craft a message that appeals to them? On the other hand, hussle culture bros who dream of automating a whole schlock pipeline and generate passive income, those are the people he wants to appeal. Those are his people.
    • He did it to get attention. It's an outrageous statement and now people are talking about it. If he'd just announced the product, almost nobody would be saying anything.
  • Lie like hell. This is Juicero 2.0.
  • Another CEO of company promoting AI vastly misunderstands the reasons humans exist, and thinks his vision of the future isn't somehow shockingly dystopian.

    "Computer, I'd like to start a band called RUSH. I want the singer to sound like a chipmunk on Amphetamines. I want the drum parts to be unique and amazing all by themselves. Have the lyrics not be about the same tripe on the radio all the time, but instead meaningful in a way that makes you really think about things from a philosophical and human stand
  • by Big Hairy Gorilla ( 9839972 ) on Monday January 13, 2025 @06:02PM (#65086431)
    No need to actually "make" music... says CEO of Not Very Much

    *Doing* things is so 20th century. Now we just type a bit and wow! You're a musician!

    Que the usual suspects defending this dickwad and the notion that you're an artist when you type into a command line.

    Note: music is a type of art for the pedants who read this.
    • But it's hard! How are we going to get the new crop of 14 year old pop music stars and monetize them if they have to waste time learning how to compose?

  • Or GAS. If you have a loved one who is a musician you've experienced this. It typically begins in old age when the victim no longer has time or energy to play. So they switch to buying gear. Lots and lots of gear.

    They will still play when they can, but since they seldom can they buy gear instead. Relative of mine has rooms filled with amps & instruments and other various grewgaws related to their craft. In their youth they'd practice obsessively 8-10 hours a day making reams of music nobody would ev
    • by ctilsie242 ( 4841247 ) on Monday January 13, 2025 @06:26PM (#65086491)

      I have seen this with "jam bands". People playing in their garages with friends, who have GAS, perhaps having practice space somewhere for their Mac Pros and racks of old school rack-mounted synths. They rock out all the time, and of course, none of their stuff is going to be published anywhere. They do it because they don't have to worry about being on cue at a gig or having to get the drummer a ton of channels worth of mics in order to have a decent mix [1].

      I see this in other things as well. Have a friend who spins his own boards for his custom light show control boxes, and at most, he might stream what goes on to a few friends.

      This is partially why I see a ton of people hitting renaissance and medieval faires. For example, the Pennsylvania faire always runs out of tickets. People want to see live people doing stuff on stage... unplugged, or with minimal amplification. Even faires that run for a couple weekends wind up standing room only, just because people want to get away from the electronics.

      I have a feeling the pushback against this stuff is only beginning.

      [1]: Top, bottom, snares, hi-hat, bass... usually 24 channels, minimum, just for the drumset.

      • Try either the "Recorder Man" (2 mics) or "Glyn Johns'" (3 mics) techniques. When done properly, a GREAT drum sound. (hint led Zeppelin, Rolling Stones and the Who all used Glyn Johns')

    • Now I do believe corporations don't like *paying" for music. That I believe.

      I'm pretty sure that people don't like paying for it either (cough Napster cough).

  • Of all the idiotic things I've read, this is the most idiotic. What a fucking shit-brained dullard.

  • by cstacy ( 534252 ) on Monday January 13, 2025 @06:10PM (#65086449)

    "It takes a lot of time, it takes a lot of practice, you need to get really good at an instrument... "

    I wonder which instrument his parents demanded that he take lessons at, despite the fact that he has no musical talent or ability. Or is he just generalizing from his general failure at life: It seems hard and you have to DO things. Can't someone just invent a button I can push? Maybe the button can just steal the work that those stupid chumps are wasting their life producing? And better yet, I should own the button. I'm entitled to the good life! Not those idiot musicians wasting their lives. Music is just background for the true creatives, who are busy making videos that can be monetized.

    When do we get to the part where he owns the copyright for all possible sequence of notes that can be computed?

  • According to TFS what he said was

    It's not really enjoyable to make music now [...] It takes a lot of time, it takes a lot of practice, you need to get really good at an instrument or really good at a piece of production software. I think the majority of people don't enjoy the majority of the time they spend making music."

    which is not at all the same as TFH, "People Don't Like Making Music"

    It's true that a lot of people don't love practicing, and that for a lot of musicians the majority of your music time, especially early on, is spent practicing.

  • I really like the idea of AI making very rough demos into decent demos. A have gazilion song ideas, but am slow at digitally notating & sequencing all the parts together. If anyone knows a good product for such, please let me know.

    There is:

    C -> R -> G -> P

    C = composing idea
    R = rough demo
    G = good demo
    P = publishable version

    It might a while before AI does all these steps well, but R to G seems a relatively simple goal; just follow the patterns of gazillion pop-tunes (assuming pop music).

  • CEO Chatbot Bro (Score:5, Insightful)

    by rabun_bike ( 905430 ) on Monday January 13, 2025 @06:26PM (#65086493)
    So let's just do what is natural and replace them with CEO Chatbot. Let's face it. Most CEOs hate the people that work for them and their job. Let's free the shackles from those CEOs so they can enjoy themselves without the burden of actually running a company. Some of the plus sides include scripted harassment that will be lawyer tested unlike a human CEO which can get into serious trouble. Plus CEO Chatbot can respond to events 24/7 without the need of private jets or a large security detail saving millions. The benefits are just boundless with CEO Chatbot and CEO Chatbot Bro trained specficially for the tech industry. With CEO Chatbot Bro which is specifically designed to be an asshat, the tech bros no longer have to spend countless hours coming up with absurd futuristic sound bytes all on their own. CEO Chatbot Bro will do all hard lifting such as arrogant comments, an amazing yet highly inflated resume and infinite name dropping and future prediction. CEO Chatbot Bro is trained on countless tweets and tech manifestos from the best minds in the industry such as Elon Musk, Marc Andreessen, and Ted Kaczynski. CEO Chatbot Bro - the future is here now!
    • by Rujiel ( 1632063 )
      mod parent up
    • by jythie ( 914043 )
      Given how CEOs are increasingly becoming little more then hype men or other outward facing PR people, I would not be surprised if various boards are considering it. They are doing less and less, and are pretty expensive from the perspective of the people who actually steer a company.
    • "Most CEOs hate the people that work for them and their job."
      When the UNH CEO was murdered, my first thought was that it was a disgruntled employee. This is because I used to work there and I know what the environment is like there. I know some CEOs are clueless hype machines. Maybe this CEO is just a chatbot.

      I love playing music. I've learned 3 instruments (brass, woodwind, string) fairly well, but even so, when I play, the people in my house either leave or just tolerate my goofiness. Rarely I'll get

  • ... it would never cross my mind to think that there are not millions of other people who very much like to make music. If anything, we have an issue with too many (untalented) people wanting to make music, rather than too few people wanting to make music.
  • So, he's obviously wrong.
  • because Suno is, shall we say, subpar
  • "It takes three-to-five rockers to produce a rock album. With this, you don't need anyone. One machine can do all those things they send men to the studio to do now. Men no longer need die choking on their own vomit. Men can live and go on to achieve greater things than music-making and fucking groupies, which are neither ours to give or to take. They can't understand. We don't want to destroy rock, we want to save it!" -- Dr. Richard Daystrom

  • I'm not going to jump on the "what an idiot" train, but this guy is being quoted out of context. At the end of the day, making original music is hard work. Yeah, you might dream up a catchy riff or hook, but that doesn’t make it a song. It seems like he means most amateur musicians either aren't good at transposing inspiration into music or they want immediate gratification without having to put in the effort to learn an instrument and perfect a composition. For those people, an AI tool is an option i

  • ..shouldn't!
    (excluding people w/ disabilities of course)

  • CEOs and MBAs have been dreaming of the day when they could reap all the money that creativity brings without having to deal with any of those pesky artists with their "principles", or "need to experiment" or "artistic vision".

    Should be interesting to see this fail.
  • I'd love to make great music, and I play piano and it takes me months to learn a song. I also love messing with AI music things like Suno for fun, I can create silly songs I send to my friends that I could never make in real life, as I didn't dedicate my career to becoming that good. But I'd never try to sell it or replace real artists with it.

    I think people still generally regard human-created art as higher quality. It's like how people still put immense value in seeing and buying real art despite every ph

  • by Uldis Segliņš ( 4468089 ) on Monday January 13, 2025 @10:33PM (#65086879)
    Is this a deliberate stream of AI advertisements lately or people choosing what gets posted are so clueless? Can't you see this as doing marketing work for them? Please stop. Sounds as ridiculous as: Dog breeding farm director says "soon nobody will be allowed on street without a dog".
  • AI music is ephemeral. You generate, listen once, move on. Maybe one in 100 is worth saving, and 1:10,000 is ever heard by another person. It's not for publication, it's more like a game or a form of augmented imagination - private and personal most of the time. Nobody got time to listen to your shit, if they wanted to listen they can choose from millions of organic songs or generate their own AI shit.
    • by JustNiz ( 692889 )

      As someone that makes a 2nd income playing in a band that includes our own written songs (not using AI) that we've played 100's of times to just as many different large audiences, I think you're clearly missing something.

  • I don't see AI taking over truly creative work any time soon.

    A few days ago, an acquaintance (in IT like me) posted a story on social media that he asked a recently released chatbot to come up with as a test - he specified some not-too-mainstream historical, political and religious parameters and a non-English language in his prompt.

    While the story in outline looked a good fit for his ask, the language itself was very much in what must be the literary equivalent of the Uncanny Valley [wikipedia.org]. It was stilted like

What this country needs is a good five cent ANYTHING!

Working...