

Amazon Doubles Prime Video Ads to 6 Minutes Per Hour 73
Amazon has quietly doubled the ad load on Prime Video to 4-6 minutes per hour, up from the 2-3.5 minutes initially discussed when ads launched in 2024. AdWeek reports: According to six ad buyers and documents reviewed by ADWEEK, the current ad load on Prime Video now ranges from four to six minutes per hour. And while that could bring down CPMs, buyers will be watching whether this impacts user experience. "Prime Video ad load has gradually increased to four to six minutes per hour," an Amazon representative wrote to an ad buyer in an email obtained by ADWEEK. The exchange occurred earlier this month.
The increase, which Amazon had telegraphed to investors but has not publicly acknowledged to consumers, gives the company significantly more inventory to sell across its rapidly expanding streaming business. "They told us the ad load would be increasing," said Kendra Tang, programmatic supervisor at Rain the Growth Agency. "That's been confirmed recently when we noticed more avails in the system."
The increase, which Amazon had telegraphed to investors but has not publicly acknowledged to consumers, gives the company significantly more inventory to sell across its rapidly expanding streaming business. "They told us the ad load would be increasing," said Kendra Tang, programmatic supervisor at Rain the Growth Agency. "That's been confirmed recently when we noticed more avails in the system."
The beatings will continue- (Score:4)
Remember? (Score:4, Insightful)
Remember when Cable TV offered an ad-free television viewing experience, for a monthly subscription fee?
Then the premium channels that you had to pay extra for on top of your monthly cable bill, in order to get an ad-free television viewing experience, because "regular" cable TV started showing ads?
Oops those show ads now too.
Same shit different decade different tech.
Re: (Score:2)
No. Remind me.
Re: (Score:3)
In the eighties, cable companies advertised, literally, "you'll never have to watch commercials again", and for some years, that was the case.
Until they started putting in ads.
Btw, in the seventies, where there was *only* broadcast tv, the FCC regulated it to something like five or seven minutes per HOUR. As opposed to whatever you watch now, where you get about 20min of commercials per hour.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
Remember when Cable TV offered an ad-free television viewing experience, for a monthly subscription fee?
Pepperidge Farms remembers.
Re: Remember? (Score:3)
Re: Remember? (Score:2)
Originally there were two tiers of cable channels: the "bundled" ones like ESPN, CNN, etc (those have pretty much always had commercials, they were just like additional tv stations), and "premium" channels like HBO and Showtime, which you specifically had to pay an additional monthly fee for. Those premium channels were free of external commercials (ie they would promo their own shows, etc but this was confined to between shows, never within them) until at least what the mid 90s? Later?
Re: (Score:2)
I recall there was "premium" cable and that was HBO, Showtime, Cinemax and probably a handful of has-beens and regional ones that got bought out. I recall regular cable being ~$32/mo and with premium cable (HBO) it jumped up to ~$75 but they only had a few shows and movies would rotate, not too different from how it is now except it's streaming over the internet.
Oh goody (Score:5, Insightful)
Soon it will be just like over-the-air TV, except you're paying Amazon $180/year for the privilege of watching their ads.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Oh goody (Score:4, Interesting)
That's why TV in my world went bye-bye 25 years go. I didn't want my kids bombarded with that shit. We chose what we watched, when we wanted to watch it, all ad free.
Re: Oh goody (Score:3)
There is decent commercial skip technology nowadays that brings the 15 minutes down to near zero with my DVR and OTA tuner. With Plex media server for example. Or Jriver MC with comskip. I mainly watch OTA and torrents as I'm not willing to put up with ads.
Re: (Score:2)
The old TiVos had this 15 years ago. Those things where great, well at least until they where abandoned (at least in australia, I heard somewhere they still exist in the US?) and we discovered for the first time why the cloud sucks.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, I used to have this with Windows Media Center on a custom HTPC with a Ceton CableCARD. Those were the good days. Everything recorded on a local single PVR, streamed to anywhere in the house, just one app, extremely responsive, zero ads in the UI, no cloud bullshit. I might still be using that system today if MS hadn't killed WMC.
Re: Oh goody (Score:5, Insightful)
Don't you worry. They'll get to 15 soon enough. It's all a part of the plan.
Re: (Score:3)
OTA and linear cable ad load is approximately 15min per hour.
You're not counting product placement in the "program" - which to my mind has become simply the primary ad of a endless stream of ads. Keeping in mind that I stopped watching any mainstream "entertainment" 25 years ago because of the damn ads, not just on OTA, but premium and 'exclusive' premium products. (I'm not counting being forced to go see a movie as a work 'team building' exercise). If there's a way to extract another dollar from any situation, you may be sure that the end stage capitalism we are in
Re: (Score:2)
I watch stuff thats ON-NOW and when ads come on I switch to another channel.
I also subscribe to add-on channels like BritBox and Acorn and they dont show in-show ads there.
Re: (Score:3)
I'm not paying any company that forces ads on me jack shit. I really don't understand why anyone would pay for that - the only reason to pay for Prime right now is the fast delivery, not the TV service. If you're paying for TV from Amazon, and not the delivery thing, you're being ripped off. You are literally subsidizing advertising. Not just directly, but also by helping fund content that's been blessed by our corporate overlords and preventing content from being made that isn't.
FWLIW, the only streaming s
Re: (Score:2)
Soon it will be just like over-the-air TV, except you're paying Amazon $180/year for the privilege of watching their ads.
One of the reasons Prime Video Ads hastened my departure from Amazon Prime is that I was having an issue with them ... finding my apartment. I live in a pre-WW2 building and for reasons I still cannot figure out they can get their packages here but not groceries. It is not fun scooping up a bunch of bags of groceries from in front of the wrong apartment and lugging them all the way up to mine. Unfortunately for Amazon a broken foot enflamed it into a big issue.
What's that have to do with ads on Prime?
I'm sure.... (Score:5, Interesting)
I'm sure this they'll use all this extra revenue to produce even more original content too https://cordcuttersnews.com/am... [cordcuttersnews.com] .
This is why I pirate Amazon content. (Score:5, Informative)
Even though I have a subscription. I cannot stand having to sit through ads anymore.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
You know, you can give them your money and have ad free streaming. It's under "accounts and settings", "ad free". That would fall under the first option in your either/or. Since that fulfills your demand I'll wait while you go sign up. :)
The introduction of ads for the reduced tier is long done. While the frequency is changing they aren't starting anything new.
If your complaint extends all the way back to the change in the service as thrown in with prime delivery... well, I get it... but why stop there? I'm
Re:This is why I pirate Amazon content. (Score:5, Insightful)
The problem you miss is that some of us would rather not even pay for the addled video. Prime didn't change its fee when they added video, so give me a video-free alternative at a lower price. I resent paying for something I don't use.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
That's another way of saying they gave you the video service for free with your delivery service. You aren't really paying for it. The advertisements are.
Re:This is why I pirate Amazon content. (Score:4, Informative)
You are paying for it, otherwise the ad supported service would be available to everyone.
Re: (Score:2)
Good point. I'd never thought of it that way.
Re: (Score:2)
The problem you miss is that some of us would rather not even pay for the addled video. Prime didn't change its fee when they added video, so give me a video-free alternative at a lower price. I resent paying for something I don't use.
They raised my fee. And kept raising it. That's why I cancelled. I have no desire to pay extra for video I don't watch, Music I don't listen to or whatever else "free" media they want to bundle into my price.
Re: (Score:1)
What I will do is pirate copies of Amazon shows I want to see so I don't have to put up with the ads. And I won't feel bad about it because I'm already paying for them.
Re: (Score:3)
This is exactly what happened with cable. It started off as the "ad free" alternative to over the air, and since you paid for it, it helped offset the ads. Then they started sneaking them in little bit little and upping them.
We've come full circle.
Re: (Score:2)
I just don't watch their stuff any longer. In truth, there wasn't a whole lot on there that was actually good. I quite liked Reacher as a pass-time, but I haven't bothered with the second series because it's got ads (I got as far as clicking on it, the ads started, and then I gave up - didn't even get through one whole ad). There was something else that came up on the home screen which looked like it might be okay too, but it too fell by the wayside.
All the telemetry they're getting from me says "Started Am
Saw an ad after paying for ad free (Score:5, Interesting)
Dropped the ad free sub and just stopped watching prime video entirely.
Re: (Score:2)
I have a PC right next to me in my TV room. When an ad comes on from any source, I mute the sound, and read Slashdot or any other tech site I like to visit. Been doing this for years. I watch very few ad's unless they are funny.
Re: (Score:1)
Assholes at Amazon will find a way to detect TV on mute and...turn it off, or pause the ad.
So far, my analog ad blocker has mostly worked; haven't heard or seen an ad except a brand name on accident. But it wastes my time and ruins viewing. Eventually Assholes at Amazon will eliminate the ad timer in the corner.
Re: (Score:1)
I would pay, even though I fucking hate Bezos, to watch Fallout without ads.
But since that's not an option, I will not pay. Whether I watch the series is irrelevant... to Amazon, anyway, since they will not derive any revenue from the activity either way.
Fuck them, and fuck anyone who gives them money to be shown ads, fucking class traitors. They are literally paying for the enshittification of society.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah that's what did it for me. Was just once, I don't know if it would keep happening or not, but the level of fuck that when I even paid for them not the fucking do it. I'm likely done with their service for good.
Suit yourself, Amazon (Score:5, Interesting)
Don't worry, there is a limit (Score:5, Insightful)
Prime Video ad load has gradually increased to four to six minutes per hour
Fear not, they will stop increasing the minutes per hour when they hit 60. Not sure if they will also stop increasing the subscription cost then too.
Re: (Score:3)
When the ads are up to 60 minutes per hour the next step if to surround you with drones all chanting Buy, Buy, Buy as they swoop in and out and circle around you.
Remember the consumer economy supports both Chinese industry and your local landfill company.
Re: Don't worry, there is a limit (Score:1)
Picture in picture ads.
Broadcast TV does it sometimes.
Whew! (Score:4, Funny)
So glad they got this figured out and make the experience worse!
Re: (Score:1)
Did anyone do the math? (Score:2)
When are advertisers going to learn that too many ads run people away from their product. That has been a great deal of technical market research that proves that. The bottom line after increases in ad spend also proves it. I guess the people buying ads haven't collectively figured out that the only people who are falling for the ad agency's BS is the ad buyers, not the end customers. There is plenty of data showing only 2 commercials in a typical sitcom work which is the 1st one past the end and the on
Re: Did anyone do the math? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I wonder if anyone has ever done studies of ad effectiveness vs frequency. If they had half the ads which were twice as effective, they could charge twice as much and have the same revenue and happier customers. There must be some sort of Laffer curve. No ads == no revenue but more watchers. 100% ads == no watchers and no revenue. Where is the sweet spot? Some old TV shows were 55 minutes long with 5 minutes of ads, then they switched to 50 minutes and 10 minutes, so they have to chop out 5 minutes to
Re: (Score:3)
I suspect there are a LOT of us out here who, if a commercial is too stupid, or too repetitive or is just too f-ing annoying (like those ENDLESS drug commercials), we make sure we NEVER buy their product/use their service... My mute control gets a real workout when I watch tv..
Bait and switch (Score:2)
When they first bundled video with Prime, I figured it wouldn't be too long before it went south. It did. Series would include the first season only, they dropped a few I was in the middle of watching, they shifted some shows to Britbox and others which had been included.
Then they announced the ads, and I stopped watching. You're going to charge me for something I didn't ask for and can't get a reduction for not using, AND you're going to interrupt it with ads? No thanks. Stopped watching. Well, I was
Enshittification (Score:2)
27 posts (so far), and nobody...
Re: (Score:2)
All words are made up.
Ad free is 2.99 per month. Worth it. (Score:4, Informative)
Ad free is 2.99 per month. As long as there is an ad-free tier and it is not too terribly expensive, I don't really care if Amazon uses ads on their "Included with Prime" tier. When I first subscribed to Amazon Prime they didn't even have a streaming business. So I still kind of feel like the Included With Prime streaming is "free" in some sense.
What irritates me is Freevee. Last time I checked, even though Freevee is an Amazon streaming service, there is no way to use it ad free. So far I have not watched anything on Freevee for that reason.
Re: (Score:1)
Do you want piracy? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Fuck Prime (Score:2)
Shitty interface, ho-hum programming.
I advise rip and cancel tactics.
Race to the Bottom (Score:2)
Yet another example of the Race to the Bottom, exemplified by Jack Welch running GE into the ground.
Take great brands that people trust, and slowly erode quality to increase profits until you've sucked up all the money and you're left with a dried-up husk of a company.
YT as well (Score:2)
YT has also increased their "ad load" on users -- yes yes i know, use an adblocker and i do. but sometimes its too convenient to put it on an ipad and move around with it, at which point you realize, HOLY FUCK this is unbearable.
Re: YT as well (Score:2)
Yeah YouTube is unwatchable without an ad blocker. Absolutely full of ads
Re: (Score:1)
Yarr! (Score:2)
"Why is piracy so popular!!" laments the clueless executive.
You don't suppose it's because people don't like having to subscribe to 5 different services to view the content that they want AND need to suffer through ads on top of it as well, do you? How often do you see a preview for something or are searching for a specific movie/show, only to realize that it's not on the service you're paying for?
Ad Blockers are now a MUST (Score:2)
Good for them (Score:2)
Good for them. I stopped watching before, so I don't care.
There are no ads (Score:1)
Torrent (Score:1)
I wouldn't mind seeing adverts: I like beer/babes/bikes/bacon - flood me with ads!!