

DC Studios Chief Says Movie Industry Is 'Dying,' Claims Disney 'Killed' Marvel With Output Mandates (rollingstone.com) 116
DC Studios co-head James Gunn argues that the movie industry is "dying" primarily because productions begin before screenplays are complete, while also delivering a sharp critique of his former employer Marvel Studios, which he claims Disney has "killed" through output mandates.
Gunn dismissed common explanations for Hollywood's struggles like declining theater attendance or improved home viewing experiences, telling Rolling Stone that "the number one reason is because people are making movies without a finished screenplay." The filmmaker has implemented a strict rule at DC Studios requiring finished scripts before production starts, recently scrapping a project because its screenplay wasn't ready.
The director, who previously helmed three "Guardians of the Galaxy" films for Marvel, said Disney's corporate directive to increase output destroyed the studio's creative process. "They were under a corporate mandate, yeah. That wasn't fair. It wasn't right. And it killed them," Gunn said, referring to Marvel's mandated production quotas for movies and television shows. By contrast, Gunn said DC Studios operates without numerical mandates. "We don't have the mandate to have a certain amount of movies and TV shows every year. So we're going to put out everything that we think is of the highest quality," he explained.
Gunn dismissed common explanations for Hollywood's struggles like declining theater attendance or improved home viewing experiences, telling Rolling Stone that "the number one reason is because people are making movies without a finished screenplay." The filmmaker has implemented a strict rule at DC Studios requiring finished scripts before production starts, recently scrapping a project because its screenplay wasn't ready.
The director, who previously helmed three "Guardians of the Galaxy" films for Marvel, said Disney's corporate directive to increase output destroyed the studio's creative process. "They were under a corporate mandate, yeah. That wasn't fair. It wasn't right. And it killed them," Gunn said, referring to Marvel's mandated production quotas for movies and television shows. By contrast, Gunn said DC Studios operates without numerical mandates. "We don't have the mandate to have a certain amount of movies and TV shows every year. So we're going to put out everything that we think is of the highest quality," he explained.
"What evil lurks in the hearts of Scrum?" (Score:5, Funny)
TIRED: "Shoot what? We don't even have a script!"
WIRED: "Show biz has embraced agile!"
Re:"What evil lurks in the hearts of Scrum?" (Score:4, Insightful)
Movie goers are the alpha testers.
Re: (Score:2)
I think we call that "early access release" these days. That's not even much of a joke. Just look at Alien Romulus, a great movie in many respects, but one that objectively had a post release change in VFX for the streaming / DVD release based on reviews from the theatrical release.
Re: "What evil lurks in the hearts of Scrum?" (Score:2)
A very fair point, indeed.
People just probably got smarter and developed more defenses against hype-creating film marketing departments and have had enough of paying money to see a cat in a bag.
Re: (Score:2)
The problem is Marvel movies are good, but increasingly creatively boring.
DC movies meanwhile, are completely random disconnected nonsense, like DC is more concerned with protecting IP than producing anything that might tarnish Superman or Batman.
Like "Arrowverse" CW TV was pretty good for what it was. "The Flash" was the best part of the DC Television universe.
But they also made all of it run too long. They should have made every season an adaption of one storyline from the comics, and left it that. This n
Re: (Score:2)
It's worth noting we haven't really seen a new generation DC movie. The DCEU thing was a failure, definitely. It remains to be seen what Gunn will do with the thing, the new Superman film looks potentially interesting and a step away from Snyder's Batman-fan take but, I mean, there have been at least three bad Superman films before the DCEU even came into being.
Anyway, point is we don't know what the new movies will be like.
Also, Legends of Tomorrow was the best Arrowverse, fight me! ;-) (OK, minus season 1
Re: "What evil lurks in the hearts of Scrum?" (Score:2)
Suicide Squad and Peacemaker were aces. A shame we canâ(TM)t get more like that.
Re: (Score:2)
AFAIK Peacemaker S02 comes out in August. Of this year!!
Marvel (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
But they're rebooting The Naked Gun franchise! With an all-new cast led by Liam Neeson! Oh, wait...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
The exception that proves the rule.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Deadpool & Wolverine was pretty great, and that's Marvel.
That's legacy Fox, with the Marvel label slapped on. The original Deadpool would never have gotten made inside of Disney proper.
Re: (Score:1)
I would watch Harry Potter's cast read a telephone book aloud, so it was hard to go wrong.
There is a lot of good work being done today, even by Disney (Andor).
Re: (Score:2)
Emma Watson: Higgsley Squigglebotham. Five-nine-two Elkdale Terrace. Zero-two-zero, five-six-four-one, seven, seven, seven, seven.
Gives me the chills. :-D
Re: (Score:2)
Yea...
Except for Black Widow and Love & Thunder I just haven't been able to conjure or sustain much interest in Marvel post-Endgame. That seems to be the consensus of most of my friends who also like the genre. I don't know if we all underestimated just how much Chris Evans and RDJ were the "heart" of the franchise, or if the story just felt done after Endgame, or if there's just no way the bar set by Endgame will be topped anytime soon. But Marvel seems to be in "And oh, a bunch of this miscellaneou
Re: (Score:1)
Because none of that stuff ever existed in Hollywood before conservatives starting crying about woke stuff, right?
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Not to the extreme extent we're seeing these days...no.
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
Guess you never watched Dog Day Afternoon or Midnight Cowboy. To Kill A Mockingbird is even pretty woke in 2025.
Like people crying about new Star Trek being "woke". Were you even watching the same show? Star Trek is a socialist utopia where money isn't needed and the federation is all about inclusivity and peaceful means. It featured the first interracial kiss on tv and according to Shatner he intentionally flubbed all the other takes so the network was forced to use the scene. Characters have changed gende
Re: (Score:2)
Star Trek is a socialist utopia where money isn't needed and the federation is all about inclusivity and peaceful means.
Yes. It's also a universe where everything fits together and the focus is on the matter at hands. It's a universe filled with professionals, where protagonists respect each other, even when they don't agree with each other. Hell, even enemies respect each other, most of the time.
The new Star Trek flix and TV Series are anything but.
It's the difference between "how the natural order of things should be" and "how some insecure dude or dudette thinks things should be".
Star Trek: TNG felt natural, something we
Re: (Score:1)
Nope never heard of those shows which is fine, indie crap can do whatever it wants as long as it's not shoved down our throats in mainstream.
BUT BUT STAR TREK !!! That is always a retarded straw-man argument. The original show never shoved it's neo-lebral crap at us non-stop like the new shows does. Kirk romancing every couple of episodes was never a big deal that's why that kiss happened - no one cared even in the 70's.
Re: (Score:2)
Trek, at least up through TNG (and arguably DS9) was profoundly anti-transhumanist. The Borg were a cautionary tale about self-modification through cybernetics, while Khan and his crew were a cautionary tale about biological self-modification through genetic engineering or otherwise.
Trek was stodgily in favor of humanity remaining basically human, regardless of the circumstances.
A lot of what passed for "woke" these days is a thinly-veiled test platform for transhumanism. Roddenberry and his immediate foll
Re: Marvel (Score:3)
The 1959 classic Some Like It Hot was all about gender bending and was "woke" af.
Re: (Score:3)
Claude Rains and Peter Lorrie both played obviously homosexual men (Raines playing Renault in Casablanca and Lorrie playing Joel Cairo in The Maltese Falcon), telegraphed in such a way that it would make it past the Hayes Code. Heck, look at Johnny Guitar, with Joan Crawford playing as butch a character as you will find in the films.
But yeah, Some Like It Hot has so much straight and queer visual and dialogue innuendo running around it that it's absolutely nuts. When Tony Curtis's character blurts out in fr
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
To be fair, Disney making Captain Marvel a woman and Black Panther a black person, and Ms Marvel a Muslim, is just absurd pandering to the liberal marxist left wing homosexual agenda ;-)
Re:Marvel (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm sure the problems have nothing to do with ruining beloved characters.
Probably not, since Deadpool is pansexual, and frankly acts rather gay.
Re: (Score:3)
So you preferred David Hasselhoff's version of Nick Fury to Sam Jackson's? The best actor for a roll should get it, regardless of their race/gender/etc. Hiring someone based on their race is a "DEI hire" right? I thought you MAGA shits were against that?
Re: (Score:1)
Funny how no one brings up race batting shit until some progressive little asshat like you shows up.
Re: (Score:2)
Fuck off-The only thing that matters is story (Score:2)
I'm sure the problems have nothing to do with ruining beloved characters...race and gender swapping, and more interested in promotion of "the message" rather than true to the cannon story telling.
If the story was good, you'd LOVE anything with race/gender swapped. Make Deadpool a trans afrolatina with high functioning autism and just as funny and make the story even better, you'd embrace it. This whole "canon" discussion is pure bullshit. All that matters is if it's entertaining. Any race/gender swapping failed because you were bored.
Miles Morales was a much better spiderman than Andrew Garfield's Spiderman. Most prefer the Spiderverse spiderman because it was simply a better story.
Most p
Re: (Score:2)
Comics aren't even sacred to themselves. Probably the most parodied aspect of superhero comics is just how frequently "canon" is thrown into a blender, thrown out, and how new writers will just ignore established canon. Every decade or two, the publishers will make a big deal of reuniting timelines, and act as if it was part of some grand plan. The complexity of the textual history of Green Lantern, as an example, rivals the New Testament.
Re: (Score:2)
You pick an existing story or character for that appeal and existing fanbase. You don't then go shit on it in front of the fans while trying to appeal to the masses who were never fans by trying to bring them into whatever hack story made from a PLOT BOOK you randomly picked on a deadline. Now, you can use an AI to do that crap writing and it'll probably come out better simply because it's highly flawed output actually creates interesting ideas.
I think AI will surpass humans at doing popular appeal; but th
Re: (Score:2)
The phenomena are likely related. If you're on a breakneck release schedule, schlock that might not make it past test audiences slips through the cracks. Careers that maybe never should have happened, happened.
eh (Score:2)
"So we're going to put out everything that we think is of the highest quality"
Let us know when you start.
Re: (Score:2)
Ouch.
Re: (Score:2)
You know they haven't put out any movies yet, right?
Gunn is in charge of a full reboot of the DC stuff. The DCEU were the "previous guys".
It's arguably not even the same corporation any more, given Discovery bought WB.
Can't say he's wrong. (Score:1)
It isn't "dying"... go make new stuff... (Score:4, Interesting)
The movie industry isn't dying. People are just tired of the same old, washed up, grim, IP over and over again. Bring back the 80s with new, fantasy IP that isn't connected to some existing universe or is a spin-off. Bring back stuff that doesn't have the same Hollywood ending. Create IP that can have one standalone movie and not need sequels or reboots.
For DC, enough with the darker and grittier aspects. Do something campy as an alternate timeline, bring back a less lethal, but annoying Joker, perhaps a Joker who is chaotic neutral rather than an elemental force of chaotic evil. We could use a 2 minute, 30 minute bomb disposal scene again.
These are grim times. Time for the movie industry to realize that, and bring back more comedies. Naked Gun is a step in the right direction. Perhaps a Star Wars: Lower Decks?
Re: (Score:2)
Dark is less predictable.
It's really not.
I thought for sure tom cruise's character would die. He didn't. Totally ruined the movie for me. It felt like such a waste of time.
lol sounds like "unpredictable" isn't what you are looking for.
Time for some introspection, see who you really are. Which isn't someone seeking unpredictability.
Re: (Score:1)
He wasn't dumb. He just didn't have experience with starships and 3D combat.
Lack of experience doesn't equate to stupidity.
He went up against one of the best captains in Star Fleet (backed up by Spock and an highly experienced crew) and almost beat him! He probably would have too, if his insanity didn't get in the way.
If it had been scored like a football game, Kahn definitely would have covered the spread, even if he lost the match.
The real solution is cheaper movies (Score:5, Insightful)
There are many issues with the movie industry at the moment...but I think that many of them can be addressed simply by making cheaper movies.
If a studio commits to spending half a billion dollars on a movie, they're going to enforce extremely rigid parameters. If Gunn wants to get half-billion dollar budgets, he's going to have to deal with the fact that he won't be the director - the Board of Directors will be.
The more practical approach is to pursue less expensive movies - $10M-$50M is a much better ground to work with, because the suits won't be as rigid on their direction. More creativity can flourish because there won't be as much pressure to be a paint-by-numbers film. There won't be expectations of making a billion dollars; if five $20M movies get made and one makes $200M and the other four only break even, the studio covered their costs and still doubled their money.
So, yeah, apparently James is discovering that big piles of money come with rules. News at 11.
Re: (Score:2)
Apparently Andor cost $625 million for two seasons, and it's excellent. The Guardians of the Galaxy movies were around $250 million each to make, and are generally regarded as some of the best Marvel movies.
While the corporate bean counters can ruin movies, to really succeed they just need to get good creative people and trust them.
I'm still amazed that Andor was made. A lot of it was clearly based on current events, including the situation in Gaza and the first Trump presidency, and the second season is ba
Re: (Score:2)
Apparently Andor cost $625 million for two seasons, and it's never going to make that money back.
FTFY.
Note: I have no problem with products costing more money than they can make back, but I bet your left nut against your right nut Andor will be canceled. Very low chance there will be a Season 3.
I was joking about your nuts. Not about Andor being very likely canceled, though.
Re: (Score:2)
> but I bet your left nut against your right nut Andor will be canceled. Very low chance there will be a Season 3.
Nonexistent, given it was only supposed to be two seasons.
Re: (Score:2)
Considering that they already announced a month ago that there would not be a Season 3, that's not a difficult call.
Re: (Score:2)
They said before season 2 started that there would be no season 3. The story is finished.
Stop milking the superhero movies (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
Oh, you have a power? I have power + 1! Oh yeah?! I have power + 5! Oh yeah?!! Turns out, I have power + infinity!
This is basically every super hero movie I have ever seen.
Re: (Score:2)
I'd love to see a movie set in the Sanderson's Reckoners universe. It's a universe where the super-heroes (called "epics") are actively evil.
Re: (Score:2)
You forgot to resolve all conflict with time travel at the endgame.
Re: (Score:2)
My favourite superheroes, such as Batman and Black Widow, have no superpowers, so there are at least a few exceptions to that. But yeah, that is generally the problem with the genre.
Re: (Score:2)
I didn't like twisted sickness that infected the Deadpool movies; couldn't even finish the 1st one. However, in the 2nd one they should have done more with that lady with the power of LUCK! That was perfect to be satirical on no-power superheroes.
Batman totally has a super power; although, a few movies get close to removing his luck powers. Black Widow is even more lucky.
Re: (Score:2)
My biggest problem with the Marvel (sans Spiderman) and DCEU stuff was the insistence on a format that made it hard, if not impossible, to explore what the actual consequences of the superpower was.
The original Superman films (at least, one and two, maybe three if it hadn't been badly written), and the first Wonder Woman, were examples of the genre done right. Likewise the Ms Marvel TV show which added both a "I have powers" and a "Culture you're not familiar with" thing to make it genuinely interesting. Wh
Re: (Score:2)
You can do the same thing in SF with :"technobabble gizmo + 1", or in fantasy with magic systems, or war movies with secret weapons. How you resolve the action is just a macguffin, what actually matters is how deep and interesting are your characters and do you have an interesting story to tell. If those things are true, the plot can be as goofy as you want and people will still connect to it.
Re: (Score:2)
They should just stop doing the superhero crap. It's boring, you can play that only a few times before you start repeating the same tropes over and over again. It's just basically Greek god stories but with the modern entourage.
Superhero movies make up a tiny minority of releases, and are definitely not the worst of what Disney is pushing. Good superhero movies still make decent money and are still entertaining. What you can do about this is: go watch something else. There were a handful of superhero movies released in 2024, out of 569 total movies in the USA alone. There's something out there for you if you want to go look.
Re:Stop milking the superhero movies (Score:4, Interesting)
There are still interesting stories to tell. Suicide Squad and Peacemaker were both pretty good, and I'm hopeful that his new Superman movie is similarly interesting.
The issue is the saturation of the market with crap superhero stuff, with second rate characters and a focus on introducing new ones and setting up the next movie, rather than telling a complete and interesting story.
I like how Gun leans into the comic book silliness in his works. They aren't parodies, but they do acknowledge how silly it all is. Peacemaker, the character, is basically a satire of US foreign policy, and that's something that we have only really scratched the surface of. I do wonder how far he could take it, like could he do a Bananaman movie where the whole basis of the character and villains is parody, or is there a limit to it? Certainly the movies that have set out to be funny, like Shazam, have been fairly uninspiring.
Re: (Score:2)
There are still interesting stories to tell. Suicide Squad and Peacemaker were both pretty good
Eh. Still pretty stereotypical, even with a freaking secret Nazi base.
Re: (Score:2)
They should just stop doing the superhero crap. It's boring, you can play that only a few times before you start repeating the same tropes over and over again. It's just basically Greek god stories but with the modern entourage.
I agree. It was amazing when they first started coming out. Now I'm tired of it. I'm tired of time travel stories too.
Here's the thing though: the beauty of free markets is Disney is free to try one approach, DC is free to try another. We'll see in the end which one works out better. I don't really care which approach they use as long as great content eventually shows up on my screen. I personally can't keep up with all the Star Wars and Marvel content Disney is cranking out so I'd be pretty happy if they s
Maybe the Industry is Dying? (Score:2)
Maybe the movie industry is dying because it became obsessed with feasting on its own rot. Case in point, if you think Disney/Marvel played a significant role in killing the movie industry, the industry itself could be blamed for allowing one studio to control that much of the industry.
That said, maybe the movie industry needs to die. And maybe, just maybe, some of those really good indie films that get produced year after year but barely get any recognition can start being recognized for being as good as t
The "content" industry will adapt. (Score:4, Informative)
When westerns fell out of favour in the late '70s and early '80s, the content industry was able to adapt across radio, TV and full lenght film.
and westerns were MUCH MORE prevalent than superhero has been.
do not worry, the content industry will adapt once more...
The problem is... (Score:2)
... endless superhero movies.
It's also a lack of creativity with remakes, reboots, "franchises" and other endless retelling of old stories.
Theaters are dinosaurs that deserve to die. They were once necessary because of the tech of the time, but today there is nothing pleasant about the theater experience
The real reason (Score:2)
The real reason is that they issued so many superhero movies that people got bored. How many times can you watch someone save the world over and over again? It's like they only know one plot line.
Audiences want a dopamine payoff, not a plot. (Score:2)
James Gunn gave a revealing interview this week about the state of Hollywood, blaming "output mandates"—studio demands to meet yearly content quotas regardless of script readiness—for the industry's ongoing collapse. He’s not wrong, but let’s be honest: this isn’t a new problem. It’s a return to form. Hollywood has always been about quantity over quality. What’s different now is that the illusion of quality no longer holds.
The average audience member isn’t dem
Instant cassettes! (Score:2)
everything woke turns to shit (Score:1)
most movies nowadays are nothing but a vehicle for propaganda. stop stuffing ur gay race communism into films and focus on the story. the studios don't care about losing money cause this propaganda is like a religion to them, they will have to go out business so something can emerge from its ashes. i have stopped paying attention to movies for the most part, i only see a half a dozen movies a year at most and i torrent them. not gunna risk $15/ticket to see something that'll i'll probably have to suffer thr
Re:Nah (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes, we get it. Everything is about the culture war. Thanks for reminding us all about this because the rest of us love hearing about it all the fucking time.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
I'm always baffled by conservative claims of the omnipresence of social messaging in todays media.
A bad movie is a bad movie whether it has social messaging in it or not and we're getting plenty of turds nowadays that have nothing to do with messaging.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
There have been entire movies dedicated to "girl power" for decades. It's only ever a problem if it's poorly done.
Re: Nah (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I saw that movie in the theatre, and discussing it afterwards even the women in our group said they rolled their eyes at that. It was just so difficult to maintain your "suspension of disbelief" when they do stuff like that.
Comic book movies, suspension of disbelief. Right. But that moment was too much. How on earth did you ever cope with Charlie's Angels or Wonder Woman?
Re: (Score:2)
Charlie's Angels was cheesy AF, but they were honest about it. It mixed organically with the action.
Wonder Woman (I don't remember which one I watched) actress meant business. She looked and acted in a way that yelled "do NOT mess with me".
Here's another favorite of mine: Xena, the Warrior Princess. Lucy Lawless was top-tier. She gave you the impression she could casually stroll towards you, rip one of your feet off your body and beat you to death with it, without breaking a sweat. Perfectly in line with th
Re: Nah (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, even the best film is hard to watch when it gets too preachy, or when the political message is a cheap, out of place afterthought mandated by some corporate bigwig who knows next to nothing about story writing and breaks the suspension of disbelief.
Waterworld does a much better job of hiding the political message (climate change) in a sci-fi action movie. I hope we will see more like that as the world descends into authoritarianism and misses climate goals. Then the ride down will be at least a little
Re: (Score:2)
Twelve Angry Men must have driven you insane
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
They are hyper sensitive to it now, because of years of conservative politicians trying to convince them that they are under attack and in need of saving from the do-gooders, the Cultural Marxists, the woke blob, or whatever it's called this year.
Re: (Score:2)
Boy are they hypersensitive about it!
What you've said are my thoughts on it as well. I miss the days of people just calling a bad movie bad.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm always baffled by conservative claims of the omnipresence of social messaging in todays media.
They miss the simple, social message free films of old like Citizen Kane, The Great Dictator, Mr Deeds Goes To Town, 12 Angry Men. . .
Re: (Score:2)
When Spaceballs 2 came up on Slashdot I came across someone complaining that it wouldn't be good because it would probably be "woke". I reminded them that one only needs to watch 10 minutes of Blazing Saddles to know Brookes has always been "woke".
As youve pointed out, tons of great movies are all about the message.
Re: (Score:2)
Hollywood has been woke and pandering throughout all of its existence. The problem has nothing to do with woke, it's got to do with bad writing and bad acting. The problem has got to do with dumb audiences who know they don't like something but can't articulate why and therefore just default to "OMG WOKE" as a result. There's many problems with films. The worst take of them is woke pandering, the intelligent among us can actually articulate the real problems in the script / acting / production.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
If it were that simple and all about everything being too woke then we should clearly see many new "non woke" movies appearing and generating massive success?
Looking forward to the box office smash featuring James Woods, Kevin Sorbo, the chick from the Mandalorian, Rob Schneider, ummm.. hold on there's more. Melissa Joan Hart, and oh yes Scott Baio!
Re: (Score:3)
... OMG. Great idea for a MCU movie: avengers & co as congressmen and senators try to pass a bill.
Iron Man can filibuster as long as it takes!* while Tony sleeps in the suit and Jarvis speaks for him.
Re:Nah (Score:5, Insightful)
The problem is the modern formula where the only point of the story is to string together fan references and memes in a shotgun approach to go viral on social media. Its no wonder these movies are trash. They have to make them super long to get as many viral moments as possible, and the stories are bad because they take a back seat to 30 second memes. Woke bullshit has a chance to go viral, so it gets put in. Its not to push an agenda, its to go viral. Same reason they strip mine your beloved franchises for memeable moments.
You're half right, Identity doesn't matter. (Score:1)
Hiring talentless writers and actors because of their orientations, politics, and skin color and then pushing woke bullshit in the movies sunk the franchise Nobody would care if all the movies were good.
All that matters is if it's entertaining. If it was well written enough, you'd watch anything that was "woke." The issue is simple...companies produce shit that's not entertaining...it was like this before we had this level of diversity. Studios push shitty movies all the time. Talented directors produce duds. You can shoehorn your stupid politics into it...but it doesn't matter....a good story is a good story...whether it was written by a white Mormon or a polyamorous, tri-racial, non-binary drug enth
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: Nah (Score:2)
Is your comment not doing the same thing?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You know, I don't have a panic attack if Macbeth is set in 1920, or if they recast Hamlet as a woman. I'll complain if the acting is shitty, but if the actors, whatever their gender or skin color, can pull off a good King Lear, then that's the only thing that counts.
Re: (Score:3)
When the movie is too boring to even suck, the audience will entertain itself.
Re: (Score:2)
What is killing movie theaters is the audience.
That is one good reason. Another good reason is that the sound system is WAY too loud. The last time I went to the theater/cinema, I wished I had brought my ear plugs. The sound was far into hearing-damage territory.
Re: (Score:1)
I agree, way too loud.
On the other hand, they have to turn it up so you can hear it over all the audience talking.
Re: (Score:2)
I hate to break this for you, but Hollywood has always been woke (your terms). Andy Griffith is even woke because he didn't want to carry a gun.
Re: (Score:2)
We've always had "preaching" stories. What do you think the Bible nearly entirely is?
90% of stuff is crap. Survivorship bias means that you don't see the crap produced hundreds of years ago and forget about the crap produced dozens of years ago.
The problem with "woke" stuff is that they lose track of needing to "tell a good story" in order to successfully sell their morality play.